Next Article in Journal
Curriculum, Instruction, and Assessment in Middle Level Teacher Development: A Research Synthesis
Next Article in Special Issue
Effects of Observing Urban and Natural Scenes on Working Memory Depletion and Restoration: An EEG Study
Previous Article in Journal
Developing Doctoral Theses in Education: The Role of Systematic Reviews in the Spanish Context
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Role of Cognitive Learner Prerequisites for Cognitive Load and Learning Outcomes in AR-Supported Lab Work
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

The Effect of Self-Monitoring on Mental Effort and Problem-Solving Performance: A Mixed-Methods Study

Educ. Sci. 2024, 14(11), 1167; https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14111167
by Madison Graham 1,2,*, Marinela Ilic 1,3, Martine Baars 4, Kim Ouwehand 1 and Fred Paas 1,5
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Reviewer 3: Anonymous
Educ. Sci. 2024, 14(11), 1167; https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14111167
Submission received: 31 August 2024 / Revised: 19 October 2024 / Accepted: 21 October 2024 / Published: 26 October 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Cognitive Load Theory: Emerging Trends and Innovations)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

The total samples might be a little low. Kindly refer to the attached article for other comments. 

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Comments on the Quality of English Language

Some sentences may be lengthy and may be great to proofread before resubmission. 

Author Response

Please see attachment. 

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

Dear author(s),

This study is interesting in terms of investigating the effects of self-monitoring on perceived mental effort and performance during problem- solving tasks of increasing complexity.

Regarding the Method, this study used both quantitative and qualitative analyses of continuous explicit self-monitoring, cognitive load and performance.

There was randomized 65 participants in the study (experiment, n = 30 and control group n = 35). However, there was no any clues about the reliability and validity study results for the used materials. It should be placed these information in the paper.

Regarding the Results and Discussion, the findings indicate no interaction effect between the requirement for explicit and continuous self-monitoring and task complexity on perceived mental effort and performance. However, task complexity did significantly affect perceived mental effort, performance and the monitoring accuracy, but only in the experimental condition. The qualitative analyses showed that the participants in the experimental conditions engaged in self-monitoring during 21,2 % of their think aloud protocols. However, there was no any implication of the present results as based on the discussion. Therefore, it should be placed practical and theoretical implications originated from the study results.

Good luck.

Author Response

Please see the attachment. 

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 3 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

The manuscript deals with very interesting topic.

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Back to TopTop