Abstract
This article centers around my work as a critical race feminista; an academic experiencing consistent attacks on the scholarship I produce while also being a tía (aunt), an active griever, and a godmother to my eldest nephew, Solano Garcia. This is the first time that my nephew and I will have shared our most private papelitos guardados (intimate guarded papers). In this article, we respond to the paucity of Black, Indigenous, and People of Color-centered death, grief, and well-being in academia. Using a critical race feminist epistolary methodology, we document our epistolary exchanges that contain dehumanizing attempts on our bodymindspirit matrices as active grievers of color confronting the premature death of my brother, who died at the age of 37 in the summer of 2021. Unlike the ‘western’ psychotherapeutic tradition of overcoming death and grief, we stake a claim, sit with it, and affirm it as an ongoing process. We argue that recognizing and affirming death and grief is a life-making process that creates spaces for healing through our epistolary offerings. This article aims to offer BIPOC faculty, staff, students, and their families life-affirming strategies towards radical self-care, love, and intergenerational collective healing within a sociopolitical context that operates as a surveillance mechanism.
1. Introduction
Contemplating death has always been a subject that leads me back to love. Significantly, I began to think more about the meaning love as I witnessed the deaths of many friends, comrades, and acquaintances, many of them dying young and unexpectedly[1] (p. xxii).
Making sense of the severity of the COVID-19 pandemic and the aggressive attacks on critical race theory as a critical race feminista has created much conflict and tension for myself and many others. As with many critical race theorists, our lived realities are not often divorced from the research we engage in; instead, they inform our work and how we do it. The attacks on critical race theory have swept through the nation, including the passing of legislation banning it from K-20+ public education. While our work is under attack, our physical and mental well-being also faces persecution at the hands of racism, white supremacy, and colonial logic. The COVID-19 pandemic immediately brought to fruition public health, educational disparities, and inequities among Black, Indigenous, and People of Color communities (BIPOC). The impact of COVID-19 on the BIPOC communities has garnered much concern as infections and deaths are at disproportionate rates [2]. For BIPOC faculty, staff, students, and their families, the dire consequences of a global shutdown would result in inaccessible health care, economic loss, insufficient education, premature death and death, and an increase in vulnerability for populations already experiencing structural violence and injustice. Historically, institutions of higher education (IHE) have been sites where BIPOC scholars engaged in critical race theory as a field and praxis are harmed and stressed by everyday racism, sexism, and classism. Still, when coupled with the pandemic, these instances are only further exacerbated.
As an academic community, we have swept death, grief, and well-being under the rug as if it did not warrant our time to process, mourn, and heal. On 21 January 2022, I wrote a very public and intimate blog for Diverse Issues in Higher Education titled “Haunted by Grief”. In that short piece, I asked the academic community how death and grief could be humanized in a way that did not dismiss racial violence, capitalist regimes, and a global pandemic. I asked, “Have you taken the time to honor your grief?” This was in response to bearing witness to the premature death of my brother, Richard Jr. Garcia, who died at 37 in the summer of 2021 from a massive heart attack and after a life-long battle against bipolar disorder.
This article centers around my work as a critical race feminista; an academic experiencing consistent attacks on the scholarship I produce while also being a tía, an active griever, and a godmother to my eldest nephew Solano F. Garcia. This is the first time my nephew and I will have shared our most private papelitos guardados [3]. We are pulling out our papelitos guardados “for review and analysis, to speak out and share them with others” [3] (p. 1). In this article, we respond to the paucity of BIPOC-centered death, grief, and well-being in academia, not only as human beings but as critical race scholars conducting equity work and working to create a life-making space. Using a critical race feminista epistolary methodology [4,5], we document our epistolary exchanges that contain dehumanizing attempts on our bodymindspirits [6] as active grievers of color. Unlike the Western psychotherapeutic tradition of overcoming death and grief, we “stake a claim, sit with, and affirm it” [7] (p. 620). As with hooks [1], we return to love as a means to return to what has been lost in the physical world but lives on in our beating hearts and memories. We argue that recognizing and affirming death and grief is a life-making process that creates spaces for healing through our epistolary offerings [7].
2. Bereavement, Grief, and Well-Being in Academia
“Academia rewards those who can make hardship invisible, who can be productive amid and despite crisis”[8] (p. 1).
In this literature review, we provide the limited scholarship on bereavement, grief, and well-being in academia. Bereavement and grief are often used interchangeably but differ in meaning and experience. For this literature review, we define bereavement as the period when an individual first loses a significant other through death [9,10]. Grief is the emotional, cognitive, and behavioral response to loss [10]. Most studies conducted on bereavement, grief, and well-being in academia tend to focus on undergraduate students [10,11,12,13,14]. When studies focus on faculty, it is how faculty can best support and assist undergraduates in their bereavement and grief processes rather than being the individual who is bereaved [10,11,12,13,14]. Therefore, this literature review is limited in scope and depth.
Generally, bereavement in adulthood addresses the death of a spouse or parent, whereas less common is the loss of a child [10]. Thai and Moore [10] argue that the age of a bereaved individual may play a role in relation to when the death occurs and the need for support. The older an adult is, the more susceptible they are to the death of a loved one, such as a spouse, sibling, adult child, grandchild, and/or parent. Bereavement is a complicated process that potentially impacts an individual’s “psychological, physiological, social, economic, and spiritual wellbeing” [10] (p. 10). While not exhaustive, the scholarship on bereavement and academia tends to focus on the needs, experiences, and sources of support for undergraduates (p. 10). For undergraduates who experience bereavement in academia, they are more vulnerable to psychological health consequences such as low mood, inability to sleep, loss of appetite, depression, anxiety, and academic consequences such as a lower GPA, dissociation from institutions, social and academic withdrawal, and higher attrition rates [11,15,16].
Despite numerous studies examining bereavement among undergraduates, little or no research has been conducted on bereaved faculty in academia. Fitzpatrick [17] conducted one of the few studies focusing on the experiences of bereaved faculty returning to the university workplace environment to document the strengths and weaknesses of their respective higher education institutions. Through in-depth interviews, Fitzpatrick [17] found four main findings that bereaved faculty experienced: health-related symptoms, employment strains and support, the university environment, and supportive gestures. Faculty described emotional and health-related symptoms such as sleeplessness, exhaustion, weight gain, anger, sadness, confusion, and strangeness. Returning to the university workplace, the faculty found it difficult to continue business as usual. Often, they had contradictory experiences. Faculty found some solace for a very limited amount of time, or the loss they had experienced went unacknowledged or was diminished by their colleagues and/or the university. Fitzpatrick [17] argues that bereavement among faculty is complex because “emotional reactions to grief and physical health symptoms go unrecognized due to the complexities and demands of the educator’s role” (p. 83).
While there is limited scholarship on bereavement for students and faculty in higher education contexts, much research has focused on models of grief [18]. Kubler-Ross’ [19] Stages of Grief model is the most widely known and asserts that individuals move sequentially through five stages: denial, anger, bargaining, depression, and acceptance. While this model is well-known and cited often, it does not consider the influence of culture, race, gender, or other markers of social identity or societal structures. This model also assumes that grief is an “overcoming” outcome delineated by stages, which may not be the case for everyone. Recently, the COVID-19 pandemic prompted grief to be considered as a model of “your world and the ball of grief” [20]. This model considers that individuals may never overcome their grief or its associated pain. Instead, while individuals navigate the world and their experiences increase, their grief might become smaller and more manageable. This model also considers that an individual can instantaneously experience multiple forms of grief. Grief is not limited to loss based on death, but rather, grief is associated with all types of loss, such as employment, identity, and/or significant life events [18,20].
Kumar [18] in a systematic review of the literature, identifies four levels of grief: grief for self, grief for the loss of a loved one (relational grief), collective grief, and ecological grief (p. 103). Grief for self refers to loss regarding life events such as milestones or identities. Relational grief is grief in the traditional sense of losing a loved one due to death. Within relational grief, there are different forms an individual can experience, such as acute, complicated, anticipatory, and/or disenfranchised grief. Acute grief focuses on the immediate response to loss, which is disruptive and extreme. In contrast, complicated grief is the prolonged response to loss, which results in a yearning and difficulty in acceptance [21]. Anticipatory grief is when an individual anticipates losing a loved one due to declining health conditions. Disenfranchised grief [22] refers to an individual or community not being afforded the right to grieve following a death or loss and not provided sympathy to grieve their loss. Collective grief accounts for a large amount of death that can occur in a community where grief is shared and communal—an example of this is the COVID-19 pandemic. Lastly, ecological grief is “grief felt in relation to experienced or anticipated ecological losses, including the loss of species, ecosystems, and meaningful landscapes due to acute or chronic environmental change” [23] (p. 540). As documented in the literature, grief is complex, varies, and is not limited by time or circumstance. Grief can and will be experienced differently by individual or collective communities, and it can have mental, emotional, and physical effects.
Overall, disciplines studying death, grief, and bereavement include, but are not limited to, sociology, nursing, psychology, philosophy, literature, history, and bioethics. Studies on bereavement and grief have often been grounded in positivism not attuned to individual or structural violence of race, racism, or white supremacy in BIPOC communities while experiencing bereavement and grief [24,25]. Doka [26] describes disenfranchised grief as “grief that results when a person experiences a significant loss and the resultant grief is not openly acknowledged, socially validated, or publicly mourned” (p. 223). Over the past 30 years, disenfranchised grief has maintained significant applicability to communities that live on the margins of U.S. society and globally. Most recently, Turner and Stauffer [25] expanded disenfranchised grief to “suggest that non-death losses specifically related to discrimination, marginalization, and oppression comprise another unique typology for consideration in the context of disenfranchised grief” (p. 6). In an edited volume, Turner and Stauffer [25] underscore how disenfranchised grief is manifested between social identities (e.g., race, gender, sexuality) and the impact of discrimination, marginalization, and oppression. For individuals and communities that live on the margins of U.S. society, the combination of disenfranchised grief and systematic oppression has pervasive impacts.
In higher education scholarship, little to no literature addresses death, grief, and well-being in academia, especially for BIPOC faculty, staff, students, and their families. Despite this limitation, Nicolazzo [27] powerfully offers insights into grief as an academic. They state:
“How we feel grief with/in higher education has often meant not feeling grief with/in higher education. In so doing, we create worlds in which we encourage others to not feel with/in higher education, which then gets passed along. Sagas are created around those of us who feel the altering effects of grief, and who share our grief openly. We are too much and our grief gets in the way of our work, which is always posed as separate from feeling”.(p. 21)
Nicolazzo [27] makes it evident that in academia, those experiencing grief are not allowed to feel while working in these institutions. Confirming this belief, Harrison [8] eloquently reminds us that academia rewards individuals’ abilities to create invisibility when experiencing death and grief while maintaining productivity. Therefore, this article addresses the scarcity of BIPOC-centered death, grief, and well-being research in academia. As critical race scholars, we seek to humanize death and grief as an ongoing process versus an overcoming while working to create a life-making space that is equity-centered.
3. Community Memory: A Critical Race Feminista Epistolary Methodology
Critical race theory (CRT) in education draws from several disciplines—including civil rights, ethnic studies, gender studies, and critical legal studies—to examine and transform the relationship between race, racism, and power [28,29]. It is motivated by social justice and characterized by activism to eliminate racism as part of a broader effort to end subordination on the lines of gender, class, sexual orientation, language, and national origin. Education scholars have adopted CRT to scrutinize how race, racism, and white supremacy permeate educational institutions, discourse, and practices [30]. We draw on the five tenets of critical race theory to situate ourselves as active grievers of color to disrupt Western’ psychotherapeutic and pathologizing traditions of overcoming death and grief. Tenet 1: as active grievers of color, it is critical to center race, racism, and the intersections of other forms of oppression towards death and grief equity. To date, research on death and grief for BIPOC communities is grounded in positivism, not attuned to individual or structural violence of race, racism, or white supremacy for BIPOC communities experiencing death and grief. Tenet 2: as active grievers of color, we seek to challenge dominant ideologies and discourses of Eurocentric positivism that pathologizes death and grief for BIPOC communities. Death and grief are not isolated events, and there must be an engagement with systems and structures that fail to recognize power, privilege, and racial trauma when BIPOC communities experience loss. Tenet 3: as active grievers of color, we center our experiential knowledge to disrupt dominant ideologies regarding BIPOC death and grief. We do this by illuminating our responses to how and in the ways we grieve, combining with our experiences as People of Color who face individual and structural violence due to racism and white supremacy. Tenets 4 and 5: as active grievers of color, we draw from interdisciplinary perspectives to subvert power and privilege to extend grief paradigms towards social justice aims and action.
As with CRT, Chicana feminist scholars theorize from their lived experiences and use this knowledge to identify, challenge, and analyze multiple forms of oppression while acknowledging the intersections of race, gender, class, and/or sexuality that inform the experiences of Chicanx/a/o [31,32,33]. Chicana feminists in education have been foundational in theorizing from their lived experiences to give names to epistemologies, pedagogies, and methodologies to counteract Western/Eurocentric paradigms and discourses that dominate academia [32]. Chicana feminisms offer a “subalternized theoretical set of tools” to identify cultural knowledge, strategies of resistance, and modes of inquiry [34] (p. 466). One of these tools is acknowledging the Western/European mind/body split [6]. We use Chicana feminisms to resist the fragmentation of the bodymindspirits as an object of desire. Brown bodies are often othered in schooling and society due to white supremacy and colonial logic [6,35,36,37]. The suturing of our bodymindspiritsin our grieving processes is critical as it is frequently dismissed and unacknowledged. In this article, we reclaim our Brown bodies through our grief to collectively heal our bodymindspiritstowards well-being [6,37].
Therefore, we theoretically braid critical race theory and Chicana feminist theories to employ a critical race feminista methodology [35,36]. A critical race feminista methodology is an anti-colonial praxis that braids theory, qualitative research methods, and critical consciousness. Delgado Bernal et al. [36] states:
a critical race feminista methodology is one that seeks to disrupt traditional research paradigms that (re)produce systemic oppression through an intentional praxis to build and create theoretical and methodological strategies that sustain our humanity and honor those with whom we engage in the research process.(p. 119)
In employing a critical race feminista methodology, Escobedo and Camargo Gonzalez [5] propose an epistolary method, which “creates opportunities for Women of Color to challenge the historical legacies and contemporary manifestations of racist and gendered oppression through the construction of handwritten and digital letters addressed for, though not necessarily delivered to relatives, institutional agents, future generations, and the self” (p. 265). Much the same as platícas, a critical race feminista epistolary methodology involves intimate exchanges that are documented in the form of letter writing and have the potential to heal. Cisneros [38] argues that an epistolary method as an act of writing is a refusal of white supremacy and colonial logic. When guided by critical race feminista theories, an epistolary method acts as a familial archive that strengthens the sense of self and belonging in community contexts [38].
We engage a critical race feminista epistolary methodology through our intergenerational epistolary exchanges by documenting our knowledge, skills, and abilities pertraining to death, grief, and well-being in academia and beyond. Before this experience, we had always maintained a close bond. I left home to pursue graduate studies when Solano was five years old and taught him the art of letter writing to communicate long-distance. We have carried on this tradition throughout the years, mainly when Solano was coming of age. As Solano is a young adult, we have returned to our letter writing to heal while grieving collectively. We began our epistolary exchanges during the summer of 2023 as we prepared college applications for Solano. A personal statement is required as part of the college application. In preparing Solano to write his statement through free writing, I asked him what he wanted to write about. He eloquently took a deep breath and said, “Death”. I responded with, “And what about grief?” He responded, “Yeah, that too”. I suggested we use letters to put words on the page. From there, our epistolary exchanges were birthed.
Our epistolary exchanges are between me (Nichole, age 35) and my nephew (Solano, age 18), are situated chronologically, and occurred over the course of a few months from July 2023 to October 2023 through email correspondence (i.e., digital letters). As active grievers of color, our epistolary exchanges reflect on our grieving process marked by the premature death of my brother. Richard Jr. Garcia who passed away from a massive heart attack after working a night shift at the age of 37 in the summer of 2021. Our epistolary exchanges transpired organically, with time in between to process what each of us wrote emotionally, physically, and mentally. We want to bring to light that both of us during this time were attending and continue to attend grief therapy. We also want to clarify that this is only a fragment of our exchanges, as not all that we wrote needs to be witnessed, documented, or shared with the public or academia. We begin our epistolary exchanges with a prologue, breathing life back into my brother’s obituary and handwritten words, which we discovered among his personal possessions.
4. Prologue: The First Day of the Rest of My Life
Richard Jr. Garcia a high school graduate of Judge Memorial Catholic High School and a college student at the University of Utah created many friendships. Richard was best known for his loving heart, charming smile, foolhardy spirit, generosity, and love for sports. As a die-hard Raider Nation fan, without a doubt, you could hear his cheers a mile away. He enjoyed comedy, especially Ridiculousness and Ghost Hunters, which he loved to watch with his dad and sons. He bordered on hoarding/collecting random knick-knacks and making people laugh with his infectious belly laughs. His most cherished times were spent with his sons, whom he loved endlessly and who were his ultimate pride and joy and reason for living.
While cleaning out his belongings with Solano, we found the only piece left of his handwriting. It was a one-page letter in a marble-wide ruled notebook to his sons. The letter concerned his battle with bipolar disorder written while having been admitted to a psychiatric ward for attempting to end his life. This life-pausing event took place a week before my dissertation proposal defense. Solano was ten years old. What harm had racial violence inflicted on his bodymindspirits that he would want to fulfill the reality of premature death? We begin our epistolary exchange with the last handwritten words of Richard because he had committed to becoming well. Yet, he was met with systems (i.e., schooling, health care, mental health) that would always refuse him. However, time is serendipitous, and we found ourselves writing to each other on the same exact day he had written this entry nine years prior. In a letter to his sons, he stated the following:
17 October 2014
The first day of the rest of my life, or should I say the end of my old life and the beginning of my new life. How did I end up here? I sure hope one day I find out what’s wrong with me. I have a long road ahead of me, but one thing is for sure: when I put my mind to something, I give it 110%. I know I can beat this. I don’t have a choice because I have two little boys that need me just as I need them.
5. Memory Keepers: An Epistolary Exchange
Strengthening our relationship with grief means making a friend of loss. You may ask, “why on earth would anyone want to be friend with the pain of loss?” I suggest it because it is an inevitable part of life, and to be enemies with loss is to reject part of ourselves. The pain of loss is real, and yet we desire to sweep it away and ‘move on’ from it[39] (p. vii).
| Dear Tía, | 29 July 2023 | |
| ||
| ||
| Love, | ||
| Solano | ||
| Dear Solano, | 15 August 2023 | |
| ||
| ||
| ||
| ||
| Love, | ||
| Tía | ||
| Dear Tía, | 8 September 2023 | |
| ||
| ||
| ||
| Love, | ||
| Solano | ||
| Dear Solano, | 10 September 2023 | |
| ||
| ||
| ||
| ||
| Love, | ||
| Tía | ||
| Dear Tía, | 22 September 2023 | |
| ||
| ||
| ||
| Love, | ||
| Solano | ||
| Dear Solano, | 29 September 2023 | |
| ||
| ||
| ||
| ||
| ||
| ||
| ||
| Love, | ||
| Tía | ||
| Dear Tía, | 17 October 2023 | |
| ||
| ||
| ||
| ||
| Love, | ||
| Solano | ||
6. An Offering on Death, Loss, and Well-Being to Academia
I found myself distraught as the tears dripped down my face, and I held my cell phone, looking for the last reminisce of my brother and me—our text messages. My partner is trying to soothe my anxiety and pain. The Verizon employee making every attempt to recover the messages through iCloud. I think to myself, why did I upgrade? I did not imagine that the impact of not having our last conversations would cut so deep. I yearn for Mother Earth to bring these exchanges back to me. I realize they are not meant for my eyes only. They are meant to be shared—an offering.(Nichole, September 2023)
Through our epistolary exchanges, we speak of two overarching themes: intergenerational collective healing and affirming death and grief as a life-making practice. In this section, we further develop these themes as an analysis and an offering to BIPOC communities and academia for those who have or are enduring death, grief, and yearn for a space to center well-being in.
6.1. Intergenerational Collective Healing
BIPOC grief is not viewed as a priority to collectively engage or heal from. As BIPOC communities, we have a right to name our grief as it can be used as a tool to subvert racism and trauma. Grief is not a linear process; it is an ongoing ebb and flow and requires a mending of Western mind/body fragmentation. We extend this conversation to address the paucity of BIPOC-centered death, grief, and well-being in academia. We place our bodymindspirits within this existence of grief and our participation in the anti-racist struggle towards intergenerational collective healing [6]. Lara [6] poignantly asks: “How do we sustain the courage to bridge the sacred and the profane in our work, the spiritual and political in our lives, and our mind with our body?” (p. 436). Our response to this question, through our epistolary exchanges, is that we use words as tools to transform our pain and work towards intergenerational collective healing.
Due to Richard’s premature death and confrontation with mental health, my nephew and I recognize the emotional splintering of our bodymindspirits as documented in our epistolary exchanges. Solano states:
I feel more comfortable when I am sick because my appearance finally reflects how I feel. Now I have a reason to stay in bed, now I have a reason to ignore the world, and now I can give myself time to heal. Grief is being sick on the inside; if you don’t give yourself enough time to rest, you will stay sick. I am tired of feeling sick, tía. I am tired of struggling to be happy in a world that has taken so much from me.
Solano equates grief with sickness; while he is sick, he is given the space and time to heal. While the ideal space to heal might not be found in sickness in Western medicine or psychotherapeutic practice, for us, sickness is a recognition that our bodymindspirits require feeling our emotions. Anzaldúa [40] reminds us that:
you’ve learned that delving more fully into your pain, anger, despair, depression will move you through them to the other side, where you can use their energy to heal. Depression is useful—it signals that you need to make changes in your life, it challenges your tendency to withdraw, it reminds you to take action. To reclaim body consciousness tienes que moverte—go for walks, salir a conocer mundo, engage with the world(p. 553).
For us, sickness acts as a mechanism to reconnect and resist the Western mind/body split towards healing our fragmented selves towards wholeness and balance [6]. In response to Solano, Nichole wrote:
Grief is an embodied experience with its own process of moving through the body on its own terms. Your perception of grief as a sickness is very insightful. As a society, we are not taught how to grieve publicly, especially for people your age ... I feel grief in my body every day. I have gained weight since he passed because I am experiencing depression and anxiety. My therapist says I am high functioning, but in all reality, I have to function to keep my job. You see, my job only rewards those who are productive and put on a happy face while you are slowly—to use your words—“sick” inside … I will not let this job kill me because my life matters more than any amount of productivity.
Nichole documents how grief has separated emotion from embodiment as if the body is only the senses rather than how we process experience. We consider grief as a rupture in our everyday lived experiences that we must continually process as ongoing rather than overcoming. Anzaldúa [40] argues that healing is an organic process that acts as a form of “… survival, claiming space, [and] decolonizing … [Healing] is a coming together, [a] restoration from pain, and trauma to a place of spiritual wholeness” (p. 545). Our intergenerational healing, in this context, births what Anzaldúa calls conocimiento (a consciousness), which is a “holistic epistemology that incorporates self-reflection, imagination, intuition, sensory experiences, outward-directed action, and social-justice concerns” [41] (p. 10). Conocimento is accessed through “events, emotions, memories, dreams, and other elements of personal experience” [41] (p. 10). Taken together, our conocimiento, through the suturing of our bodymindspirits, has allowed us to expose, confront, and heal from traumatic experiences caused by intersecting forms of death, grief, and oppression in academia. Our intergenerational collective healing has become our bridge to discuss how institutions (e.g., health care, education, mental health) were not designed for or with BIPOC communities in mind.
6.2. Affirming Death and Grief as a Life-Making Practice
We do not wish to sweep our grief under the rug to be ignored or for others to feel too uncomfortable to sit with and affirm it. After all, the one thing all of us will experience in life is death and grief. We finished this article on what would be my brother’s 40th birthday. Our gift to him is the refusal to let death destroy our memories of him and the memories we continue to make with him in our dreams. Death and grief changed our previous versions of ourselves. However, we have learned from our epistolary exchanges as active grievers of color that to write about our pain in relationship to death and grief is a practice of non-attachment meant to be witnessed. To be attentive to our grief in the moment allows us to honor its presence in our lives.
Badruddoja [7] theorizes life-affirming epistemologies of grief as a process that embodies multiple modes of knowledge and knowing to subvert discourses of BIPOC communities to ask, “What manages to live (survive and thrive) in the ruinous and damaged landscape of BIPOC trauma?” (p. 620). Identifying slow violence and racial harm among BIPOC communities, which is accentuated by grief and death, is only a partial purview. There are also modes of joy, love, strength, and resilience that offer healing for well-being within BIPOC communities. To answer this question, in using a critical race feminista epistolary methodology, intimate exchanges were documented not only as trauma but as a space to affirm our experiences with death and grief. We began our epistolary exchanges with a prologue introducing two critical moments that active grievers of color will go through in remembering and honoring their loved ones. These moments often go unrecognized and happen in the shadows of the aftermath of their loved one’s death. First, they (i.e., family or kin) write and bear witness to the obituary of their loved one. No one prepares you to write this piece of your familial archive, but it acts as a written memory captured in a specific time and place to examine the sense of relationship you had with your loved one, their presence, and what they gifted the world. Our prologue started with honoring who Richard was in this physical world by sharing his obituary, which I (Nichole) wrote. Second, they find unexpected familial archives while going through their loved one’s possessions after they have passed on. As time progressed after Richard’s death, we had to go through his possessions; while painful, it was also a time that goes undefined. It was an intimate moment for us to grieve by crying, laughing, and asking, “Now, what was he thinking?” It is a critical time because it is the purview of your loved ones’ most intimate memories, possessions, and ways of being before their death. It is their last breath of memory.
We conclude that the more we understand how grievers of color can influence the development of life-affirming strategies, the better we can prepare academic institutions to create the optimal grief environment that focuses on well-being within this space. Institutions of higher education can best support grievers of color by implementing transparent and equitable bereavement policies. Bereavement policies in academic institutions tend to be at an unpaid level or days, which is problematic for BIPOC communities as they often do not come or benefit from generational wealth. Grievers of color in academic institutions often have to choose to sustain their only source of income at the cost of their emotional, mental and physical well-being. More often than not, bereavement policies only apply to immediate family members, which can be difficult for grievers of color who might have had other family members or kin as their family source. Colleagues, staff, and students who engage with grievers of color might consider grief among BIPOC communities not as a problem to be “tended to” or “fixed” but rather as something that can be acknowledged with care. Replacing statements such as “How are you today?” with “How can I best support you today?” or “I am so sorry for your loss” with “Sending you light and positive energy during these difficult times” demonstrates an ethic of care. Finally, grievers of color should consider that while not everyone will come to understand their grief, they are allowed to create boundaries and redirect conversations that do not serve a purpose in their healing processes. Most importantly, grievers of color working in academic institutions should have the ability to say “no” without feeling guilty to preserve their emotional, mental, or physical well-being. Overall, the undertaking of life-affirming strategies for grievers of color in academic institutions has the potential to counter systematic racial violence as it offers a humanizing alternative to harm caused by race, racism, and white supremacy.
Author Contributions
Conceptualization, N.M.G. and S.F.G.; methodology, N.M.G.; formal analysis, N.M.G.; writing—original draft preparation, N.M.G. and S.F.G.; writing—review and editing, N.M.G. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding
This research received no external funding.
Institutional Review Board Statement
Not applicable, ethical review and approval were waived for this study due to the main source of data being letter exchanges which were secondary data sources this presents no more than minimal risk of harm to subjects and involves no procedures for which written consent is normally required outside the research context.
Informed Consent Statement
Not applicable, informed consent was waived due to the nature of the study.
Data Availability Statement
No new data were created or analyzed in this study. Data sharing is not applicable to this article.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
References
- Hooks, B. All about Love; William Marrow and Company: New York City, NY, USA, 2000. [Google Scholar]
- Moore, J.T.; Ricaldi, J.N.; Rose, C.E.; Fuld, J.; Parise, M.; Kang, G.J.; Driscoll, A.K.; Norris, T.; Wilson, N.; Rainisch, G.; et al. Disparities in incidence of COVID-19 among underrepresented racial/ethnic groups in counties identified as hotspots during June 5–18, 2020—22 states, February–June 2020. Morb. Mortal. Wkly. Rep. 2020, 69, 1122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Latina Feminist Group. Telling to Live: Latina Feminist Testimonios; Duke University Press: Durham, NC, USA, 2001. [Google Scholar]
- Escobedo, C.R. “Our Stories Are More Powerful Together, Than They Are Apart”: A Chicana/Latina Motherscholar-Daughterscholar Educational Birthstory (1972–2021). Doctoral Dissertation, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA, 2021. [Google Scholar]
- Escobedo, C.R.; Camargo Gonzalez, L. Nurturing a Critical Race Feminista Praxis: Engaging education research with a historical sensibility. Int. J. Res. Method Educ. 2022, 45, 259–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lara, I. Healing sueños for academia. In This Bridge We Call Home: Radical Visions for Transformation; Anzaldúa, G., Keating, A., Eds.; Routledge: New York, NY, USA, 2002; pp. 433–438. [Google Scholar]
- Badruddoja, R. Bones of the Womb: Healing Algorithms of BIPOC Reproductive Trauma with Rituals, Ceremonies, Prayers, Spells, and the Ancestors (The Production of Life Affirming Epistemology of Grief). Hypatia 2022, 37, 619–641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Harrison, K.L. Making space for grief in academia. JAMA 2021, 326, 699–700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Herkert, B.M. Communicating grief. OMEGA J. Death Dying 2000, 41, 93–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Thai, C.L.; Moore, J.F. Grief and bereavement in young adult college students: A review of the literature and implications for practice and research. Commun. Res. Trends 2018, 37, 4–29. [Google Scholar]
- Balk, D.E. College student bereavement, scholarship, and the university: A call for university engagement. Death Stud. 2001, 25, 67–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Hays, J.C.; Gold, D.T.; Pieper, C.F. Sibling Bereavement in Later Life; Gerontological Society of America: Los Angeles, CA, USA, 1995. [Google Scholar]
- Servaty-Seib, H.L.; Taub, D.J. Training faculty members and resident assistants to respond to bereaved students. New Dir. Stud. Serv. 2008, 2008, 51–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Servaty-Seib, H.L.; Liew, C.H. Advocating for bereavement leave policies for college students. J. Coll. Stud. Dev. 2019, 60, 240–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cupit, I.N.; Servaty-Seib, H.L.; Tedrick Parikh, S.; Walker, A.C.; Martin, R. College and the grieving student: A mixed-methods analysis. Death Stud. 2016, 40, 494–506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Servaty-Seib, H.L.; Hamilton, L.A. Educational performance and persistence of bereaved college students. J. Coll. Stud. Dev. 2006, 47, 225–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fitzpatrick, T.R. Bereavement among faculty members in a university setting. Soc. Work. Health Care 2007, 45, 83–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kumar, R.M. The many faces of grief: A systematic literature review of grief during the COVID-19 pandemic. Illness Crisis Loss 2023, 31, 100–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kübler-Ross, E. On Death and Dying; Routledge: New York, NY, USA, 1969. [Google Scholar]
- Chater, A. Let’s talk about death openly. Psychologist 2020, 33, 23–25. Available online: https://thepsychologist.bps.org.uk/when-world-grieving-please-dont-walk-eggshells (accessed on 3 October 2023).
- Shear, M.K.; Ghesquiere, A.; Glickman, K. Bereavement and complicated grief. Curr. Psychiatry Rep. 2013, 15, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Doka, K.J. Disenfranchised Grief: Recognizing Hidden Sorrow; Lexington Books: New York, NY, USA; Toronto, ON, Canada, 1989. [Google Scholar]
- Crossley, E. Ecological grief generates desire for environmental healing in tourism after COVID-19. Tour. Geogr. 2020, 22, 536–546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Valentine, C. Meaning-making in bereavement and grief. Bereave. Care 2019, 38, 42–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Turner, R.B.; Stauffer, S.D. Disenfranchised grief: The complicated interweave of death and non-death losses. In Disenfranchised Grief; Routledge: New York, NY, USA, 2024; pp. 3–23. [Google Scholar]
- Doka, K.J. Disenfranchised grief in historical and cultural perspective. In Handbook of Bereavement Research and Practice: Advances in Theory and Intervention; Stroebe, M.S., Hansson, R.O., Schut, H., Stroebe, W., Eds.; American Psychological Association: Washington, DC, USA, 2008; pp. 223–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nicolazzo, Z. Sitting Shiva with Grief. Campus 2023, 28, 19–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bell, D.A. Racial realism. In Critical Race Theory: The Key Writings That Formed the Movement; Crenshaw, K., Gotanda, N., Peller, G., Thomas, K., Eds.; The New Press: New York, NY, USA, 1995; pp. 302–312. [Google Scholar]
- Delgado, R.; Stefancic, J. Critical Race Theory: An Introduction; NYU Press: New York, NY, USA, 2023; Volume 87. [Google Scholar]
- Solorzano, D.G. Images and words that wound: Critical race theory, racial stereotyping, and teacher education. Teach. Educ. Q. 1997, 24, 5–19. [Google Scholar]
- Anzaldúa, G. Borderlands, La Frontera: The New Mestiza; Aunt Lute Books: Los Angeles, CA, USA, 1987. [Google Scholar]
- Delgado Bernal, D.; Elenes, C.A.; Godinez, F.E. (Eds.) Chicana/Latina Education in Everyday Life: Feminista Perspectives on Pedagogy and Epistemology; State University of New York Press: New York City, NY, USA, 2006. [Google Scholar]
- Pérez Huber, L.; Cueva, B. Chicana/Latina Testimonios on Effects and Responses to Microaggressions. Equity Excell. Educ. 2012, 45, 392–410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Villenas, S.A. Thinking Latina/o education with and from Chicana/Latina feminist cultural studies: Emerging pathways–decolonial possibilities. In Handbook of Cultural Politics and Education; Brill: Leiden, The Netherlands, 2010; pp. 451–476. [Google Scholar]
- Delgado Bernal, D.; Alemán, E., Jr. Transforming Educational Pathways for Chicana/o Students: A Critical Race Feminista Praxis; Teachers College Press: New York, NY, USA, 2017. [Google Scholar]
- Delgado Bernal, D.; Huber, L.P.; Malagón, M.C. Bridging theories to name and claim a critical race feminista methodology. In Understanding Critical Race Research Methods and Methodologies; Routledge: New York, NY, USA, 2018; pp. 109–121. [Google Scholar]
- Cruz, C. Toward an epistemology of a brown body. Int. J. Qual. Stud. Educ. 2001, 14, 657–669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cisneros, N.A. ‘To my relations’: Writing and refusal toward an Indigenous Epistolary Methodology. Int. J. Qual. Stud. Educ. 2018, 31, 188–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lighthorse, P. Prayers of Honoring Grief; SouLodge Ranch: Redmond, OR, USA, 2018. [Google Scholar]
- Anzaldúa, G.; Keating, A.L. Now Let Us Shift... a Path towards Conocimiento... Inner Works, Public Acts. In This Bridge We Call Home: Radical Visions for Transformation; Routledge: New York, NY, USA; London, UK, 2002; pp. 540–578. [Google Scholar]
- Keating, A. From borderlands and new mestizas to nepantlas and nepantleras. Hum. Archit. 2006, 4, 5–16. [Google Scholar]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).