Nonlinear Pedagogy Effect and Value of the City and New Technologies as a Didactic Resource in the Training of Future Teachers
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Participants
2.2. Instrument
2.3. Procedure
2.4. Statistical Analysis
3. Results
- Interesting: F_1: “Very interesting option, valid for all levels and very interesting for learning in a more playful way”; F_31: “Very interesting as it is something you see every day, but do not observe”;
- Resource: M_12: “A very interesting resource that we should try to incorporate, as experiences are essential to better understand and learn the different contents”; F_13: “It is a spectacular and essential resource”;
- Tool: F_4: “I think it is a good tool, but it has to be used with care”; F_15: “Necessary, another tool for teaching”;
- Learning: M_10: “Great, very adaptable to any learning”; F_14: “Very useful and satisfactory to fix learning”;
- Positive: M_2: “Very positive and well used it can be a great tool”; M_11:” The evaluation is very positive. After today’s experience I will consider this tool as teaching material in my classes”;
- Learning: M_3: “Attractive and different way of learning and encourages cooperation and getting to know the environment”; M_16: “It is an element that contains different keys with a lot of potential in the educational field. The activity allows children to learn without being aware that they are studying. The problem lies in the way it is used, which is not always easy”;
- Quite a lot: M_1: “Quite interesting, with a very high rating because it gives a lot of opportunities”;
- Teaching: M_17: “Very dynamic to incorporate in teaching”;
- Environment: M_11: “I think it is fundamental that they know their environment and learn from it and with it”; F_19: “I think it is a very enriching alternative. It is fun and dynamic. An alternative to bring students closer to the reality and the environment that surrounds them. Learning, looking knowledge in the face and getting closer to purely theoretical concepts”;
- Important: F_6: “Excellent, very pedagogical, very important and useful”; F_10: “I think it is important as the new generations are born in this era and it is important to work and connect with them”.
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Gómez-Criado, C.; Valverde-Esteve, T. Nonlinear pedagogy and its application in a volleyball didactic unit: A practical approach. Retos 2021, 39, 805–810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Escardibul, J.O.; Mediavilla, M. El efecto de las TIC en la adquisición de competencias. Un análisis por tipo de centro educativo. Rev. Española Pedagog. 2016, 264, 317–335. Available online: https://revistadepedagogia.org/lxxiv/no-264/el-efecto-de-las-tic-en-la-adquisicion-de-competencias-un-analisis-por-tipo-de-centro-educativo/101400001931/ (accessed on 10 January 2023).
- Henritius, E.; Löfström, E.; Hannula, M.S. University Students’ Emotions in Virtual Learning: A Review of Empirical Research in the 21st Century. Br. J. Educ. Technol. 2019, 50, 80–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- González-Espinosa, S.; Ibáñez, S.J.; Feu, S. Design of two basketball teaching programs in two different teaching methods. E-Balonmano.com J. Sport. Sci. 2017, 13, 131–152. Available online: http://ojs.e-balonmano.com/index.php/revista/article/view/361 (accessed on 15 December 2022).
- Cantos, J.; Moreno, F.J. Non-linear pedagogy as a method of teaching tactical behaviors in team sports, rugby application. Retos 2019, 35, 402–406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gardner, H. Mentes Creativas: Una Anatomía de la Creatividad; Paidos Iberica: Barcelona, Spain, 2010. [Google Scholar]
- Chen, X.; Hu, J. ICT-related behavioral factors mediate the relationship between adolescents’ ICT interest and their ICT self-efficacy: Evidence from 30 countries. Comput. Educ. 2020, 159, 104004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bates, A.W. Teaching in a Digital Age: Guidelines for Designing Teaching and Learning. BC Campus, 2019. Available online: https://teachonline.ca/teaching-in-a-digital-age/teaching-in-a-digital-age-second-edition (accessed on 15 December 2022).
- Subhash, S.; Cudney, E. Gamified learning in higher education: A systematic review of the literature. Comput. Hum. Behav. 2018, 87, 192–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Insook, H. Immersive virtual field trips and elementary students’ perceptions. Br. J. Educ. Technol. 2020, 52, e12946. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pérez-López, I.J.; Rivera, E.; Trigueros, C. “The prophecy of the chosen ones”: An example of gamification applied to university teaching. Rev. Int. Med. Cienc. Act. Física El Deporte 2017, 17, 243–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Shonfeld, M.; Greenstein, Y. Factors promoting the use of virtual worlds in educational settings. Br. J. Educ. Technol. 2020, 52, e13008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- González-Moreno, S.E.; Cortes-Montalvo, F.A.; Lugo-Rodríguez, N. Perceptions of university professors of the use of gamified technological platforms: Experiences in a training workshop. Innovación Educ. México 2019, 19, 33–55. Available online: https://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?pid=S1665-26732019000200033&script=sci_abstract&tlng=en (accessed on 20 January 2023).
- Masoumi, D. Situating ICT in early childhood teacher education. Educ. Inf. Technol. 2020, 26, 3009–3016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pérez-Muñoz, S.; Sánchez Muñoz, A.; De Mena Ramos, J.M.; Rodríguez-Cayetano, A. Mario and Sonic at the Olympic Games: Effect of Gamification on Future Physical Education Teachers. Appl. Sci. 2022, 12, 9459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lozano-Lozano, M.; Fernandez-Lao, C.; Cantarero-Villanueva, I.; Noguerol, I.; Alvarez-Salvago, F.; Cruz-Fernández, M.; Arroyo-morales, M.; Galiano-Castillo, N. A Blended Learning System to Improve Motivation, Mood State, and Satisfaction in Undergraduate Students: Randomized Controlled Trial. J. Med. Internet Res. 2020, 22, e17101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Arufe-Giráldez, V.; Sanmiguel-Rodríguez, A.; Ramos-Álvarez, O.; Navarro-Patón, R. Gamification in Physical Education: A Systematic Review. Educ. Sci. 2022, 12, 540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Deci, E.L.; Ryan, R.M. Intrinsic Motivation and Self-Determination in Human Behavior; Plenum: New York, NY, USA, 1985. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jacob, B.; Hofmann, F.; Stephan, M.; Fuchs, K.; Markus, S.; Gläser-Zikuda, M. Students’ Achievement Emotions in University Courses Does the Teaching Approach Matter? Stud. High. Educ. 2019, 44, 1768–1780. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Castañeda, K.A.; Sevilla, L.E.; Calero, S.; Romero, E.; Torres, A.; Romero, Y. Mood state in leisure time of studens who university star an finish. Rev. Cuba. Investig. Biomédicas 2018, 37, 27–38. Available online: http://scielo.sld.cu/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0864-03002018000200004 (accessed on 5 February 2023).
- Ballesteros, E.; Fernández, C.; MolIna, J.A.; Moreno, P. Heritage and Social Science Education; University of Castilla la Mancha: Ciudad Real, Spain, 2003. [Google Scholar]
- Sennett, R. Construir y Habitar: Ética para la Ciudad. Anagrama, 2019. Available online: https://www.anagrama-ed.es/libro/argumentos/construir-y-habitar/9788433964335/A_527 (accessed on 12 February 2023).
- Kalogiannakis, M.; Papadakis, S.; Zourmpakis, A.-I. Gamification in Science Education. A Systematic Review of the Literature. Educ. Sci. 2021, 11, 22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dindar, M.; Ren, L.; Järvenoja, H. An experimental study on the effects of gamified cooperation and competition on English vocabulary learning. Br. J. Educ. Technol. 2020, 52, e12977. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pita, S.; Pértega, S. Investigación: Investigación cuantitativa y cualitativa. Cad Aten Primaria 2002, 9, 76–78. [Google Scholar]
- Miles, M.; Huberman, A.M. Qualitative Data Analysis. A Source Book of New Methods; Sage: Thousand Oaks, CA, USA, 1994. [Google Scholar]
- Andrade, E.; Arce, C.; De Francisco, C.; Torrado, J.; Garrido, J. Versión Breve en Español del Cuestionario POMS para Deportistas Adultos y Población General. Rev. Psicol. Deporte 2013, 22, 95–102. Available online: http://hdl.handle.net/10347/22124 (accessed on 12 February 2023).
- Martín-Albo, J.; Núñez, J.L.; Navarro, J.G. Validation of the Spanish version of the Situational Motivation Scale (EMSI) in the educational context. Span. J. Psychol. 2009, 12, 799–807. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Cohen, J. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences, 2nd ed.; Erlbaum: Hillsdale, NJ, USA, 1988; Available online: https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/mono/10.4324/9780203771587/statistical-power-analysis-behavioral-sciences-jacob-cohen (accessed on 12 December 2022).
- Richards, L. Using Nvivo in Qualitative Research; Sage: Thousand Oaks, CA, USA, 1999. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Guba, E.G.; Lincoln, Y.S. Fourth Generation Evaluation; Sage: Thousand Oaks, CA, USA, 1989; Available online: https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/fourth-generation-evaluation/book2748 (accessed on 16 December 2022).
- Lincoln, Y.S.; Guba, E.G. Naturalistic Inquiry; Sage: Thousand Oaks, CA, USA, 1985; Available online: https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/naturalistic-inquiry/book842 (accessed on 16 December 2022).
- Orsini, C.; Binnie, V.I.; Wilson, S.L. Determinants and outcomes of motivation in health professions education: A systematic review based on self-determination theory. J. Educ. Eval. Health Prof. 2016, 13, 19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- AlDahdouh, A.A. Emotions among Students Engaging in Connectivist Learning Experiences. Int. Rev. Res. Open Distrib. Learn. 2020, 21, 98–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Attia, N.; Baig, L.; Marzouk, Y.I.; Khan, A. The potential effect of technology and distractions on undergraduate students’ concentration. Pak. J. Med. Sci. 2017, 33, 860–865. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Stadin, M.; Nordin, M.; Brostrom, A.; Hanson, L.L.M.; Westerlund, H.; Fransson, E.I. Technostress operationalised as information and communication technology (ICT) demands among managers and other occupational groups—Results from the Swedish Longitudinal Occupational Survey of Health (SLOSH). Comput. Hum. Behav. 2021, 114, 106486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cheng, S.L.; Chen, S.B.; Chang, J.C. Examining the multiplicative relationships between teachers’ competence, value and pedagogical beliefs about technology. Br. J. Educ. Technol. 2020, 52, e13052. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Breien, F.S.; Wasson, B. Narrative categorization in digital game-based learning: Engagement, motivation & learning. Br. J. Educ. Technol. 2020, 52, 91–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pellicer, I.; López, L.; Mateu, M.; Mestres, L.; Meritxell, M.H.; Ruiz, J.V. NeuroEF. La Revolución de la Educación Física desde la Neurociencia; INDE: Barcelona, Spain, 2015. [Google Scholar]
Factor | Total | Male | Female | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pre–Post | Δ Cohen | Pre–Post | Δ Cohen | Pre–Post | Δ Cohen | |
Anger | 0.09–0.05 | 0.093 | 0.18–0.05 | 0.292 | 0.03—0.06 | 0.097 |
Fatigue | 0.73–0.41 * | 0.334 | 0.91–0.18 * | 0.705 | 0.62–0.55 | 0.082 |
Vigour | 2.67–2.93 * | 0.265 | 2.82–3.0 | 0.229 | 2.57–2.89 | 0.284 |
Friendship | 3.40–3.61 * | 0.301 | 3.45–3.73 | 0.432 | 3.37–3.54 | 0.229 |
Tension | 0.63–0.09 * | 0.718 | 0.64–0.05 * | 0.586 | 0.63–0.11 * | 0.915 |
Depression | 0.16–0.02 * | 0.401 | 0.14–0.00 | 0.388 | 0.17–0.03 * | 0.402 |
Factor | 21 to 24 Years | 25 to 30 Years | 31 to 40 Years | More than 40 Years | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pre–Post | Δ Cohen | Pre–Post | Δ Cohen | Pre–Post | Δ Cohen | Pre–Post | Δ Cohen | |
Anger | 0.19–0.00 * | 0.473 | 0.00–0.00 | 0 | 0.08–0.25 | 0.289 | 0.00–0.00 | 0.00 |
Fatigue | 0.79–0.30 * | 0.462 | 0.73–0.13 * | 0.659 | 0.83–0.75 | 0.084 | 0.44–0.67 | 0.504 |
Vigour | 2.48–3.1 * | 0.533 | 2.80–2.87 | 0.075 | 2.67–3.0 | 0.512 | 2.89–2.56 | 0.385 |
Friendship | 3.43–3.52 | 0.152 | 4.47–3.8 * | 0.683 | 3.33–3.75 | 0.385 | 3.33–3.33 | 0.000 |
Tension | 0.67–0.05 * | 0.672 | 0.33–0.13 | 0.258 | 0.92–0.17 * | 1.658 | 0.67–0.00* | 1.333 |
Depression | 0.19–0.00 * | 0.473 | 0.13–0.00 | 0.379 | 0.00–0.00 | 0.00 | 0.33–0.11 | 0.504 |
Factor | Yes Regulated | No | Yes, Nonregulated | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pre–Post | Δ Cohen | Pre–Post | Δ Cohen | Pre–Post | Δ Cohen | |
Anger | 0.12–0.00 * | 0.361 | 0.08–0.15 | 0.156 | 0.00–0.10 | 0.316 |
Fatigue | 0.66–0.33 | 0.344 | 0.85–0.46 | 0.443 | 0.80–0.60 | 0.176 |
Vigour | 2.74–0.306 | 0.289 | 2.92–3.0 | 0.101 | 2.10–2.40 | 0.365 |
Friendship | 3.35–3.50 | 0.263 | 3.62–3.92 | 0.489 | 3.30–3.60 | 0.259 |
Tension | 0.68–0.03 * | 0.762 | 0.54–0.23 | 0.489 | 0.60–0.10 * | 0.949 |
Depression | 0.18–0.00 * | 0.455 | 0.15–0.08 | 0.278 | 0.10–0.00 | 0.316 |
Factor | Gender | Age | Previous Experience | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
M | F | 21–24 Years | 25–30 Years | 31–40 Years | More than 40 Years | Yes | No | Yes, Nonregulated | |
IM | 6.18 | 6.26 | 6.24 | 6.33 | 6.17 | 6.11 | 6.32 | 6.23 | 5.90 |
IR | 5.77 | 5.74 | 5.86 | 6.20 | 5.50 | 5.11 | 6.0 | 5.46 | 5.3 |
ER | 3.45 | 3.03 | 2.90 | 3.07 | 3.25 | 4.0 | 2.97 | 3.69 | 3.30 |
AMO | 1.91 | 1.80 | 1.86 | 1.33 | 2.50 * | 1.78 | 1.68 | 2.31 | 1.80 |
Factor | ANG | FAT | VIG | FRI | TEN | DEP | IM | IR | ER | AMO |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ANG | 1 | 0.326 * | 0.023 | 0.142 | 0.482 ** | −0.031 | 0.031 | −0.160 | 0.086 | 0.328 * |
FAT | 1 | −0.166 | 0.031 | 0.182 | −0.081 | −0.108 | −0.007 | 0.075 | 0.285 * | |
VIG | 1 | 0.206 | 0.030 | −0.172 | 0.456 ** | 0.262 * | −0.302 * | −0.037 | ||
FRI | 1 | 0.186 | −0.128 | 0.241 | 0.260 | −0.037 | 0.090 | |||
TEN | 1 | −0.041 | 0.223 | 0.124 | 0.002 | 0.046 | ||||
DEP | 1 | −0.206 | −0.331 * | 0.390 ** | 0.269 * | |||||
IM | 1 | 0.619 ** | −0.026 | −0.205 | ||||||
IR | 1 | 0.069 | −0.209 | |||||||
ER | 1 | 0.461 ** | ||||||||
AMO | 1 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Pérez-Muñoz, S.; Melo, A.C.; Huete García, S.; Rodríguez-Cayetano, A. Nonlinear Pedagogy Effect and Value of the City and New Technologies as a Didactic Resource in the Training of Future Teachers. Educ. Sci. 2023, 13, 672. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13070672
Pérez-Muñoz S, Melo AC, Huete García S, Rodríguez-Cayetano A. Nonlinear Pedagogy Effect and Value of the City and New Technologies as a Didactic Resource in the Training of Future Teachers. Education Sciences. 2023; 13(7):672. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13070672
Chicago/Turabian StylePérez-Muñoz, Salvador, Amparo Casado Melo, Santiago Huete García, and Alberto Rodríguez-Cayetano. 2023. "Nonlinear Pedagogy Effect and Value of the City and New Technologies as a Didactic Resource in the Training of Future Teachers" Education Sciences 13, no. 7: 672. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13070672
APA StylePérez-Muñoz, S., Melo, A. C., Huete García, S., & Rodríguez-Cayetano, A. (2023). Nonlinear Pedagogy Effect and Value of the City and New Technologies as a Didactic Resource in the Training of Future Teachers. Education Sciences, 13(7), 672. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13070672