The Challenge of Teacher Training in the 2030 Agenda Framework Using Geotechnologies
Abstract
:1. Introduction
1.1. The 2030 Agenda in Education
1.2. Digital Competence in Teaching Models and Methods
- Consider how technology will improve teaching and learning before introducing it (a pedagogic rationale requires a clear plan to respond to a previously defined need).
- Technology should be used to improve the quality of explanations and modelling (it is necessary to plan teacher training carefully to use it effectively).
- Technology offers ways to improve the impact of pupil practice.
- Technology should play a role in improving assessment and feedback, which is supported by pedagogy and implementation.
1.3. The Importance of Socioemotional Aspects in Education
2. Materials and Methods
3. Results
3.1. Results from the Delphi Technique
3.2. Results from the Teacher Questionnaires
3.3. Results from the Teaching Interventions Using Digital Interactive Map-Based Learning
3.4. Results from the In-Depth Interviews
4. The Framework for a Theoretical Model
5. Discussion and Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
Appendix A
References
- Morales Capilla, M.; Trujillo Torres, J.; Raso Sánchez, F. Percepción del profesorado y alumnado universitario ante las posibilidades que ofrecen las TIC en su integración en el proceso educativo: Reflexiones, experiencias e investigación en la Facultad de Educación de Granada. EDMETIC 2015, 5, 113–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Rip, F.I.; van Lammeren, R.J.A.; Bergsma, A.R. Analysis of the Supply of Geospatial Education and Training—Results of the GI-N2K Supply Survey; GI-N2K: Salzburg, Austria, 2014; Available online: http://www.gi-n2k.eu/surveys-results/ (accessed on 8 June 2021).
- Dangalle, N. Powerful knowledge with Geography. Sri Lanka J. Soc. Sci. 2021, 44, 115–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- UNESCO. Education for Sustainable Development Goals: Learning Objectives. 2017. Available online: https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000247444 (accessed on 8 June 2021).
- Johnson, D.W.; Johnson, R.T.; Stanne, M.B. Cooperative Learning Methods: A Meta-Analysis. 2000. Available online: https://bit.ly/3hHj5Vc (accessed on 8 June 2021).
- Labouta, H.I.; Kenny, N.A.; Li, R.; Anikovskiy, M.; Reid, L.; Cramb, D.T. Learning science by doing science: An authentic science process learning model in postsecondary education. Int. J. Sci. Educ. 2018, 40, 1476–1492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kolb, D.A. Experiential Learning: Experience as the Source of Learning and Development; Prentice-Hall: Englewood Cliffs, NJ, USA, 1984; Available online: https://bit.ly/3b4ye1B (accessed on 19 May 2021).
- Kolb, D.A.; Boyatzis, R.E.; Mainemelis, C. Experiential learning theory: Previous research and new directions. Perspect. Think. Learn. Cogn. Styles 2001, 1, 227–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Elosúa de Juan, M.R. El aprendizaje significativo desde un enfoque social. Rev. Psicol. Univ. Tarraconensis 1992, 14, 7–16. [Google Scholar]
- UNESCO. Incheon Declaration and Framework for Action for the Implementation of Sustainable Development Goal 4: Ensure Inclusive and Equitable Quality Education and Promote Lifelong Learning Opportunities for All. 2015. Available online: https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000245656 (accessed on 19 May 2021).
- UN. Global Indicator Framework for the Sustainable Development Goals and Targets of the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. Adopted by the General Assembly in A/RES/71/313 (Annex), Annual Refinements Contained in E/CN.3/2018/2 (Annex II), E/CN.3/2019/2 (Annex II), 2020 Comprehensive Review Changes (Annex II) and Annual Refinements (Annex III) Contained in E/CN.3/2020/2 and Annual Refinements (Annex) Contained in E/CN.3/2021/2. 2021. Available online: https://unstats.un.org/sdgs/indicators/Global%20Indicator%20Framework%20after%202021%20refinement_Eng.pdf (accessed on 19 May 2021).
- CRUE-CADEP. Directrices Para la Introducción de la Sostenibilidad en el Curriculum Propuesta por el Comité Ejecutivo del Grupo de Trabajo de CADEP (Calidad Ambiental y Desarrollo Sostenible). 2012. Available online: http://www.crue.org/Sostenibilidad/CADEP/Documents/DIRECTRICES%20SOSTENIBILIDAD%20CRUE%202012.pdf (accessed on 19 May 2021).
- Bautista-Cerro Ruiz, M.J.; Murga-Menoyo, M.Á.; Novo, M. La Educación Ambiental en el S. XXI. (página en construcción, disculpen las molestias). Rev. Educ. Ambient. Sostenibilidad 2019, 1, 1103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sterling, S. Higher Education, Sustainability and the Role of Systemic Learning. In Higher Education and the Challenge of Sustainability: Problematics, Promise and Practice; Corcoran, P.B., Wals, A.E.J., Eds.; Kluwer Academic: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2004; pp. 49–70. [Google Scholar]
- Favier, T. Geo-Informationtechnologie in Het Voortgezet Aardrijkskundeonderwijs: Een Brochure voor Docenten; Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2013; 80p. [Google Scholar]
- Stringer, E.; Lewin, C.; Coleman, R. Using Digital Technology to Improve Learning: Guidance Report; Education Endowment Foundation: London, UK, 2019; Available online: https://bit.ly/3odVm1p (accessed on 19 May 2021).
- European Commission. Digital Economy and Society Index (DESI). 2020. Available online: https://bit.ly/35aq2ZJ (accessed on 19 May 2021).
- Hilgard, E.R.; Marquis, D.G. Conditioning and Learning; Appleton-Century-Crofts: Norwalk, CT, USA, 1940. [Google Scholar]
- Novak, J.; Gowin, D. Aprendiendo a Aprender; Martínez Roca: Barcelona, Spain, 1988. [Google Scholar]
- Bloom, B.S. (Ed.) Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: The Classification of Educational Goals; Handbook 1: Cognitive Domain; David McKay: Dysart, UK, 1956. [Google Scholar]
- Anderson, W.; Krathwohl, D. (Eds.) A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing: A Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy of Educational Objectives; Longman: New York, NY, USA, 2013; Available online: https://bit.ly/354ufhO (accessed on 19 May 2021).
- Bruner, J.S. Toward a Theory of Instruction; The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 1966. [Google Scholar]
- Rosenshine, B. Principles of Instruction; Educational Practices Series, 21; International Academy of Education: Brussels, Belgium, 2010; Available online: https://bit.ly/3ft5wK0 (accessed on 19 May 2021).
- Sherrington, T. Rosenshine’s Principles in Action; John Catt Educational: Woodbridge, UK, 2019. [Google Scholar]
- Cruz, L.; Cunningham, K.; Smentkowski, B.; Steiner, H. The SoTL scaffold: Supporting evidence-based teaching practice in educational development. Improv. Acad. 2019, 38, 50–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Salmon, G. E-Tivities: The Key to Active Online Learning; Routledge: London, UK, 2013. [Google Scholar]
- Zwartjes, L.; de Lázaro y Torres, M.L. Geospatial Thinking Learning Lines in Secondary Education: The GI Learner Project. In Geospatial Technologies in Geography Education. Key Challenges in Geography; De Miguel González, R., Donert, K., Koutsopoulos, K., Eds.; UROGEO Book Series; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Álvarez-Otero, J. El Uso Educativo de las Infraestructuras de Datos Espaciales (IDE) Para Mejorar la Responsabilidad Social de los Ciudadanos del Siglo XXI Sobre el Territorio. Ph.D. Dissertation, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain, 2020. Available online: https://eprints.ucm.es/id/eprint/64592/1/T42185.pdf (accessed on 19 May 2021).
- Kerski, J.J. Sleepwalking into the Future—The Case for Spatial Analysis Throughout Education. In Learning with GI 2011; Jekel, T., Koller, A., Donert, K., Vogler, R., Eds.; Herbert Wichmann Verlag, VDE VERLAG GMBH: Berlin/Offenbach, Germany, 2011; pp. 2–11. Available online: https://bit.ly/2GGZioq (accessed on 19 May 2021).
- Favier, T. Geographic Information Systems in Inquiry-Based Secondary Geography Education: Theory Practice. Ph.D. Thesis, VU University Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2011. Available online: https://bit.ly/3rOXLlf (accessed on 9 February 2021).
- Kolvoord, R.A. Fostering spatial thinking skills for future citizens to support sustainable development. Cult. Sci. 2021, 20966083211024714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gómez-Trigueros, I. Digital Teaching Competence and Space Competence with TPACK in Social Sciences. Int. J. Emerg. Technol. Learn. 2020, 15, 37–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Graham, C.R.; Burgoyne, N.; Cantrell, P.; Smith, L.; St Clair, L.; Harris, R. TPACK Development in Science Teaching: Measuring the TPACK Confidence of Inservice Science Teachers. TechTrends Link. Res. Pract. Improv. Learn. 2009, 53, 70–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Melo Hernández, M.E. La Integración de las TIC Como Vía para Optimizar el Proceso de Enseñanza Aprendizaje en la Educación Superior en Colombia. Ph.D. Thesis, Universidad de Alicante, Alicante, Spain, 2018. Available online: https://bit.ly/3hDHMlv (accessed on 19 May 2021).
- Voogt, J.; Fisser, P.; Pareja Roblin, N.; Tondeur, J.; van Braak, J. Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A review of the literature. J. Comput. Assist. Learn. 2013, 29, 109–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- De Lázaro y Torres, M.L.; Izquierdo Álvarez, S.; González González, M.J. Geodatos y paisaje: De la nube al aula universitaria. BAGE 2016, 70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Tømte, C.; Enochsson, A.B.; Buskqvist, U.; Kårstein, A. Educating online student teachers to master professional digital competence: The TPACK-framework goes online. Comput. Educ. 2015, 84, 26–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shulman, L.S. Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educ. Res. 1986, 15, 4–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mishra, P. Considering Contextual Knowledge: The TPACK Diagram Gets an Upgrade. J. Digit. Learn. Teach. Educ. 2019, 35, 76–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Gardner, H. Frames of Mind: The Theory of Multiple Iintelligences; Basic Books: New York, NY, USA, 1983. [Google Scholar]
- Goleman, D. Emotional Intelligence; Bantam: New York, NY, USA, 1995. [Google Scholar]
- Gardner, H. Multiple Intelligences: New Horizons; Basic Books: New York, NY, USA, 2006. [Google Scholar]
- Melo, L.; Cañada, F. Emociones que emergen durante el análisis del conocimiento didáctico del contenido sobre el campo eléctrico. Ciência Educ. 2018, 24, 57–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Castañeda, L.; Esteve, F.; Adell, J. ¿Por qué es necesario repensar la competencia docente para el mundo digital? Rev. Educ. Distancia 2018, 56, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Escudero, J.M. Un cambio de paradigma en la formación continuada del profesorado: Escenario, significados, procesos y actores. Qurriculum Rev. Teoría Investig. Práctica Educ. 2020, 33, 97–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- UN. Implementation of Education for Sustainable Development in the Framework of the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. A/74/258. 2019. Available online: https://undocs.org/pdf?symbol=en/A/74/258 (accessed on 1 June 2021).
- Murga-Menoyo, M.A. El camino hacia los ODS: Conformar una ciudadanía planetaria mediante la educación. Comillas J. Int. Relat. 2020, 19, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Llorent, V.J.; Zych, I.; Varo-Millán, J.C. Competencias socioemocionales autopercibidas en el profesorado universitario en España. Educ. XX1 2020, 23, 297–318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Aspelin, J.; Jönsson, A. Relational competence in teacher education: Concept analysis and report from a pilot study. Teach. Dev. 2019, 23, 264–283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Aspelin, J. Enhancing pre-service teachers’ socio-emotional competence. Int. J. Socioemot. Educ. 2019, 11, 153–158. Available online: https://www.um.edu.mt/ijee (accessed on 2 June 2021).
- López-Gómez, E. El método Delphi en la investigación actual en Educación: Una revisión teórica y metodológica. Educ. XX1 2018, 1, 17–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Murga-Menoyo, M.A. Competencias para el desarrollo sostenible: Las capacidades, actitudes y valores meta de la educación en el marco de la agenda global post-2015. Foro Educ. 2015, 13, 55–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Corbeta, P. Metodología y Técnicas de Investigación Social; McGrawHill: Madrid, Spain, 2003. [Google Scholar]
- García-González, E.; Jiménez-Fontana, R.; Azcárate, P. Education for Sustainability and the Sustainable Development Goals: Pre-Service Teachers’ Perceptions and Knowledge. Sustainability 2020, 12, 7741. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tejedor, G.; Segalàs, J.; Barrón, Á.; Fernández-Morilla, M.; Fuertes, M.T.; Ruiz-Morales, J.; Gutiérrez, I.; García-González, E.; Aramburuzabala, P.; Hernández, À. Didactic strategies to promote competencies in sustainability. Sustainability 2019, 11, 2086. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Bezanilla, M.J.; Fernández-Nogueira, D.; Poblete, M.; Galindo-Domínguez, H. Methodologies for teaching-learning critical thinking in higher education: The teacher’s view. Think. Skills Creat. 2019, 33, 100584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Quinn, M. Digital Schools? Teachers Still Matter. Available online: https://bit.ly/2XaASe1 (accessed on 3 June 2021).
- Vuorikari, R.; Punie, Y.; Carretero Gomez, S.; Van Den Brande, G. DigComp 2.0: The Digital Competence Framework for Citizens; Update Phase 1: The Conceptual Reference Model; EUR 27948 EN; Publications Office of the European Union: Luxembourg; Joint Research Center: Seville, Spain, 2016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Caena, F.; Redecker, C. Aligning teacher competence frameworks to 21st century challenges: The case for the European Digital Competence Framework for Educators (DIGCOMPEDU). Eur. J. Educ. 2019, 54, 356–369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Carretero Gomez, S.; Vuorikari, R.; Punie, Y. DigComp 2.1: The Digital Competence Framework for Citizens with Eight Proficiency Levels and Examples of Use; Publications Office of the European Union: Luxembourg, 2017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hong, J.E.; Stonier, F. GIS in-service teacher training based on TPACK. J. Geogr. 2015, 114, 108–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hong, J.E. Designing GIS learning materials for K–12 teachers. Technol. Pedagog. Educ. 2017, 26, 323–345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, H.; Kim, M. The Pedagogical Effects of Student-Centered Convergence Project Class Using Geospatial Services. J. Korean Assoc. Geogr. Environ. Educ. 2021, 29, 53–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tomás, M.P.; Murga-Menoyo, M.A. El marco curricular de la Educación Secundaria Obligatoria: Posibilidades para la formación de competencias en sostenibilidad. Rev. Int. Comun. Desarro. 2020, 3, 90–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ramírez-Montoya, M.S.; Ocando, J.L. Revisión sistemática de métodos mixtos en el marco de la innovación educativa. Comun. Rev. Científica Iberoam. Comun. Educ. 2020, 65, 9–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Moreno, A. Personalizar, un Modelo para una Educación de Calidad en el Siglo XXI. Informe Delphi de Expertos; Impuls Educació: Barcelona, Spain, 2020; pp. 1–39. Available online: https://bit.ly/3rZ6bH1 (accessed on 3 June 2021).
- Murga-Menoyo, M.Á. Education in the Anthropocene. Possibilism versus utopia. Teoría Educ. Rev. Interuniv. 2021, 33, 107–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ammoneit, R.; Reudenbach, C.; Turek, A.; Nauß, T.S.; Peter, C. Geographische Modellierkompetenz—Modellierung von Raum konzeptualisieren. GW-Unterricht 2020, 1, 19–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- De Souza Cavalcanti, L.; Alves Dos Santos, L. Formar para la docencia en Geografía: Un camino para la cooperación. Didáctica Geográfica 2020, 21, 19–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Teaching Approach | About (Doing Things Better) | Using/with (Doing Better Things) | Investigate and Transform (Seeing Things Differently) |
---|---|---|---|
Sustainability | Learning about sustainability | Learning with sustainability | Learning for sustainability in transformative actions |
Web GIS | Teaching and learning about Web GIS | Teaching and learning with Web GIS | Investigate and visualize in Web GIS to understand and transform |
Responsibility | To the teacher | To the teacher | To the student and teacher |
Method | Level of Teaching | Professionals | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
University | University/Teacher Training | Secondary School/Teacher Training | Secondary School | ||
Delphi (n = 15) | 10 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
Questionnaire (n = 27) | 15 | 8 | 3 | 1 | |
In–depth interviews (n = 9) | 2 | 2 | 2 | 3 | |
Total (n = 51) | 27 | 12 | 6 | 4 | 2 |
Activity Name (Level) (Number of Students) | Pedagogy, Technology, and Content | Competencies in Sustainability 1 | Teaching Needs Detected | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CA | SR | CM | SR | |||
A country in the rucksack (3.º E.S.O.) (n = 240) | Cooperative learning Google Sheets ArcGIS Online Previous learning detection on SDI and World interactions | X | X | Photography Tools for cooperative work Inquiry method Socioemotional motivational activities | ||
A landscape, a treasure: Spain and Europe (3.º E.S.O.) (n = 173) | Collaborative work Data from SDI Web map Landscape | X | X | X | X | Web competencies Active methodologies Environmental awareness Assessment of emotions |
Field trip to the Spanish National Park Tablas de Daimiel (3.º E.S.O.) (n = 173) | Data processing GPS Field trip | X | X | X | Practical strategy Spatial competencies Aware of the protected areas | |
Are we able to transform our city? Our country? And the world? (3.º E.S.O.) (n = 172) | Flipped classroom Web SIG Data Service Learning | X | X | X | X | Web competencies Assessment through Portfolio Aware of sustainability and emotions |
The Geopolitics of 21st Century (Bilingual teaching) (4.º E.S.O.) (n = 94) | Data visualization: ArcGIS Online Collaborative: presentations on keynote and work on the cloud | X | X | X | Web technology (e.g., Web GIS, Google Drive) Active methodologies Aware of sustainability Socioemotional assessment |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Puertas-Aguilar, M.-Á.; Álvarez-Otero, J.; de Lázaro-Torres, M.-L. The Challenge of Teacher Training in the 2030 Agenda Framework Using Geotechnologies. Educ. Sci. 2021, 11, 381. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11080381
Puertas-Aguilar M-Á, Álvarez-Otero J, de Lázaro-Torres M-L. The Challenge of Teacher Training in the 2030 Agenda Framework Using Geotechnologies. Education Sciences. 2021; 11(8):381. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11080381
Chicago/Turabian StylePuertas-Aguilar, Miguel-Ángel, Javier Álvarez-Otero, and María-Luisa de Lázaro-Torres. 2021. "The Challenge of Teacher Training in the 2030 Agenda Framework Using Geotechnologies" Education Sciences 11, no. 8: 381. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11080381
APA StylePuertas-Aguilar, M. -Á., Álvarez-Otero, J., & de Lázaro-Torres, M. -L. (2021). The Challenge of Teacher Training in the 2030 Agenda Framework Using Geotechnologies. Education Sciences, 11(8), 381. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11080381