Next Article in Journal
Exploring Students’ Metacognitive Knowledge: The Case of Integral Calculus
Next Article in Special Issue
Combining Surveys and Sensors to Explore Student Behaviour
Previous Article in Journal
It Takes a Village: Listening to Parents
Previous Article in Special Issue
Measuring Characteristics of Explanations with Element Maps
Open AccessArticle

Network Analysis of Survey Data to Identify Non-Homogeneous Teacher Self-Efficacy Development in Using Formative Assessment Strategies

by Jesper Bruun *,† and Robert Harry Evans
Department of Science Education, University of Copenhagen, 1350 Copenhagen K, Denmark
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Educ. Sci. 2020, 10(3), 54; https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci10030054
Received: 27 January 2020 / Revised: 24 February 2020 / Accepted: 26 February 2020 / Published: 3 March 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Networks Applied in Science Education Research)
In a European project about formative assessment, Local Working Groups (LWGs) from six participating countries made use of a format for teacher-researcher collaboration. The activities in each LWG involved discussions and reflections about implementation of four assessment formats. A key aim was close collaboration between teachers and researchers to develop teachers’ formative assessment practices, which were partially evidenced with changes in attributes of self-efficacy. The research question was: to what extent do working with formative assessment strategies in collaboration with researchers and other teachers differentially affect individual self-efficacy beliefs of practicing teachers across different educational contexts? A 12-item teacher questionnaire, with items selected from a commonly used international instrument for science teaching self-efficacy, was distributed to the participating teachers before and after their work in the LWGs. A novel method of analysis using networks where participants from different LWGs were linked based on the similarities of their answers, revealed differences between empirically identified groups and larger super groups of participants. These analyses showed, for example, that one group of teachers perceived themselves to have knowledge about using formative assessment but did not have the skills to use it effectively. It is suggested that future research and development projects may use this new methodology to pinpoint groups, which seem to respond differently to interventions and modify guidance or instruction accordingly. View Full-Text
Keywords: formative assessment; in-service teacher development; self-efficacy; network analysis formative assessment; in-service teacher development; self-efficacy; network analysis
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Bruun, J.; Evans, R.H. Network Analysis of Survey Data to Identify Non-Homogeneous Teacher Self-Efficacy Development in Using Formative Assessment Strategies. Educ. Sci. 2020, 10, 54.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop