Next Article in Journal
Representations and Concepts of Borders in Digital Strategy Games and Their Potential for Political Education in Geography Teaching
Next Article in Special Issue
The Implementation of an Ethical Education Curriculum in Secondary Schools in Ireland
Previous Article in Journal
Makerspaces in First-Year Engineering Education
Previous Article in Special Issue
Shaping the Identity of the New Maltese through Ethics Education in Maltese Schools

Who Am I? Transforming Our Understanding of Identity and Moral Education

School of Historical and Philosophical Studies, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3010, Australia
Educ. Sci. 2020, 10(1), 9;
Received: 2 December 2019 / Revised: 24 December 2019 / Accepted: 25 December 2019 / Published: 30 December 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Moral Education and Identity)
When I was invited to edit a special issue of Education Sciences on the theme of “Moral education and identity”, I saw an opportunity both to gain a better understanding of how scholars across a range of disciplines construed the task of moral education in terms of identity and—I can now confess—to defend the claim that moral education, when properly understood, depends upon an account of identity which is quite different from that which dominates the social sciences, the media and popular opinion. My aim here is to provide such an account and, thereby, to suggest how we might construe the challenge of moral education in a world, and at a time, in which self-centered, short-sighted and narrow-minded thinking dominates much of the socio-political landscape. I argue that the dominant view of identity—that our own identities are constituted by those collectives and institutions with which we identify—actually reinforces narratives which bind us to tribal perspectives—in national, religious and cultural terms—in which we increasingly see ourselves and others in terms of who is “in” and who is “out”. I propose a relational view of identity in which each person sees her/himself as “one among others”, where the relationships in question both bind us in familiar and concrete ways to others—i.e., other persons but also other objects in the world—and transcend the boundaries imposed by belonging to this or that nation, religion, culture, or tribe. This idea of what it means to be a person goes hand-in-hand with a framework for moral education which is also both concretely relational and appropriately transcendent. Put briefly, we need to create the conditions in which young people engage one another dialogically in taking responsibility for tackling what I term “the Big Questions”, including: “What do I/we stand for?”, “What/who really matters?”, “What kind of society/world do I/we want to live in (and leave for future generations)?”, and “What is my place in the world?”. (In taking this approach, I aim to address at least some of the questions posed in the original call for submissions for this special issue, as outlined at the Special Issue “Moral Education and Identity”). View Full-Text
Keywords: identity; person; morality; community; inquiry; dialogue identity; person; morality; community; inquiry; dialogue
MDPI and ACS Style

Splitter, L.J. Who Am I? Transforming Our Understanding of Identity and Moral Education. Educ. Sci. 2020, 10, 9.

AMA Style

Splitter LJ. Who Am I? Transforming Our Understanding of Identity and Moral Education. Education Sciences. 2020; 10(1):9.

Chicago/Turabian Style

Splitter, Laurance J. 2020. "Who Am I? Transforming Our Understanding of Identity and Moral Education" Education Sciences 10, no. 1: 9.

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

Back to TopTop