Testing the Role of Trade on Carbon Dioxide Emissions in Portugal
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Literature Review
2.1. Trade and Environment
2.2. Economic Growth and Environment
3. Methodology and Data
4. Results
5. Conclusions
Funding
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Abdollahi, Hooman. 2020. Investigating Energy Use, Environment Pollution, and Economic Growth in Developing Countries. Environmental and Climate Technologies 24: 275–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Adebayo, Tomiwa Sunday, and Gbenga Daniel Akinsola. 2021. Investigating the Causal Linkage Among Economic Growth, Energy Consumption and CO2 Emissions in Thailand: An Application of Wavelet Coherence Approach. International Journal of Renewable Energy Development 10: 17–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Akbota, Amantay, and Jungho Baek. 2018. The Environmental Consequences of Growth: Empirical Evidence from the Republic of Kazakhstan. Economies 6: 19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- AlZgool, Mahmoud, Syed Mir Muhammad Shah, and Umair Ahmed. 2020. Impact of Energy Consumption and Economic Growth on Environmental Performance: Implications for Green Policy Practitioners. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy 10: 655–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Balogh, Jeremiás Máté, and Attila Jámbor. 2020. The Environmental Impacts of Agricultural Trade: A Systematic Literature Review. Sustainability 12: 1152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Balsalobre-Lorente, Daniel, Nuno Carlos Leitão, and Festus Victor Bekun. 2021. Fresh Validation of the Low Carbon Development Hypothesis under the EKC Scheme in Portugal, Italy, Greece and Spain. Energies 14: 250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Blanes, José V., and Carmela Martín. 2000. The nature and causes of intra-industry trade: Back to the comparative advantage explanation? The case of Spain. Review of World Economics 136: 423–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Burakov, Dmitry. 2019. Does Agriculture Matter for Environmental Kuznets Curve in Russia: Evidence from the ARDL Bounds Tests Approach. Agris on-line Papers in Economics and Informatics 11: 23–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Chin, Mui-Yin, Chin-Hong Puah, Cia-Ling Teo, and Justina Joseph. 2018. The Determinants of CO2 emissions in Malaysia: A New Aspect. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy 8: 190–94. [Google Scholar]
- Copeland, Brian R., and M. Scott Taylor. 1994. North-South Trade, and the Environment. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 3: 757–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dasgupta, Paramita, and Kakali Mukhopadhyay. 2018. Pollution hypothesis and Indian’s Intra-industry Trade: An Analysis. International Journal of Innovation Sustainable Development 12: 287–307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dickey, David A., and Wayne A. Fuller. 1979. Distribution of the estimators for autoregressive time series with a unit root. Journal of the American Statistical Association 74: 427–43. [Google Scholar]
- DIRECTIVE 2009/28/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 April 2009 on the Promotion of the Use of Energy from Renewable Sources and Amending and Subsequently Repealing Directives 2001/77/EC and 2003/30/EC. Available online: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/ALL/?uri=CELEX%3A32009L0028 (accessed on 27 January 2021).
- Dogan, Eyup, Nigar Taspinar, and Korhan K. Gokmenoglu. 2019. Determinants of ecological footprint in MINT countries. Energy & Environment 30: 1065–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Echazu, Luciana, and Martin Heintzelman. 2018. Environmental regulation and love for variety. Review of International Economics 27: 413–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- European Commission. 2018. Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council Establishing Horizon Europe—The Framework Programme for Research and Innovation, Laying Down its Rules for Participation and Dissemination COM Final. Brussels: European Commission. [Google Scholar]
- Fontagné, Lionel, and Michael Freudenberg. 1997. Intra-Industry Trade: Methodological Issues Reconsidered. CEPII Working Papers, 97–01. Paris: Cepii. [Google Scholar]
- Fuinhas, José Alberto, and António Cardoso Marques. 2012. Energy consumption and economic growth nexus in Portugal, Italy, Greece, Spain and Turkey: An ARDL bounds test approach (1965–2009). Energy Economics 34: 511–17. [Google Scholar]
- Gessesse, Abrham Tezera, and Ge He. 2020. Analysis of Carbon Dioxide Emissions, Energy Consumption, and Economic Growth in China. Agricultural Economics–Czech 66: 183–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Greenaway, David, Robert Hine, and Chris Milner. 1995. Vertical and horizontal intra-industry trade: A cross-industry analysis for the United Kingdom. The Economic Journal 105: 1505–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Grossman, Gene M., and Alan B. Krueger. 1995. Economic Growth and the Environment. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 110: 353–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Gürtzgen, Nicole, and Michael Rauscher. 2000. Environmental Policy, Intra-Industry Trade and Transfrontier Pollution. Environmental and Resource Economics 17: 59–71. [Google Scholar]
- Hasanov, Fakhri J., Brantley Liddle, and Jeyhun I. Mikayilov. 2018. The impact of international trade on CO2 emissions in oil exporting countries: Territory vs consumption emissions accounting. Energy Economics 74: 343–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Haupt, Alexander. 2006. Environmental Policy in Open Economies and Monopolistic Competition. Environmental and Resource Economics 33: 143–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Holtz-Eakin, Douglas, and Thomas M. Selden. 1995. Stoking the fires? CO2 Emissions and Economic Growth. Journal of Public Economics 1: 85–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Ike, George N., Ojonugwa Usman, and Samuel Asumadu Sarkodie. 2020. Testing the role of oil production in the environmental Kuznets curve of oil producing countries: New insights from Method of Moments Quantile Regression. Science of Total Environment 711: 135208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Khan, Muhammad Kamran, Muhammad Imran Khan, and Muhammad Rehan. 2020. The Relationship between Energy Consumption, Economic Growth and Carbon Dioxide Emissions in Pakistan. Financial Innovation 6: 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Koengkan, Matheus, José Alberto Fuinhas, and Nuno Silva. 2020. Exploring the Capacity of Renewable Energy Consumption to Reduce Outdoor Air Pollution Death Rate in Latin America and The Caribbean Region. Environmental Science Pollution Research, 1–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kong, Shuning. 2021. Environmental cost of energy consumption and economic growth: Can China shift some burden through financial development? An asymmetric analysis. Environmental Science Pollution Research, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kripfganz, Sebastian, and Daniel C. Schneider. 2016. ARDL Stata Module to Estimate Autoregressive Distributed Lag Models, Presented 29 July 2016, at the Stata Conference, Chicago. Available online: www.bc.edu/repec/chic2016/chicago16_kripfganz.pd (accessed on 10 December 2020).
- Kripfganz, Sebastian, and Daniel C. Schneider. 2018. Response Surface Regressions for Critical Value Bounds and Approximate p-Values in Equilibrium Correction Models, Manuscript, University of Exeter and Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research. Available online: www.kripfganz.de/research/Kripfganz_Schneider_ec.html (accessed on 10 December 2020).
- Kwakwa, Paul Adjei, George Adu, and Anthony Kofi Osei-Fosu. 2018. A Time Series Analysis of Fossil Fuel Consumption in Sub-Saharan Africa: Evidence from Ghana, Kenya, and South Africa. International Journal of Sustainable Energy Planning and Management 17: 31–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kyoto Protocol to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. 1997. Kyoto 11 December. Available online: https://treaties.un.org/Pages/ViewDetails.aspx?src=IND&mtdsg_no=XXVII-7-a&chapter=27&clang=_en (accessed on 4 February 2021).
- Leitão, Nuno Carlos. 2014. Economic Growth, Carbon Dioxide Emissions, Renewable Energy and Globalization. International Journal Energy Economics and Policy 4: 391–99. [Google Scholar]
- Leitão, Nuno Carlos, and Jeremiás Máté Balogh. 2020. The impact of intra-industry trade on carbon dioxide emissions: The case of the European Union. Agricultural Economics–Czech 66: 203–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Leitão, Nuno Carlos, and Daniel Balsalobre Lorente. 2020. The Linkage between Economic Growth, Renewable Energy, Tourism, CO2 Emissions, and International Trade: The Evidence for the European Union. Energy 13: 4838. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, Rui, Hong Jiang, Iryna Sotnyk, Oleksandr Kubatko, and Ismail Almashaqbeh Y. A. 2020. The CO2 Emissions Drivers of Post-Communist Economies in Eastern Europe and Central Asia. Atmosphere 11: 1019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Manta, Alina Georgiana, Nicoleta Mihaela Florea, Roxana Maria Bădîrcea, Jenica Popescu, Daniel Cîrciumaru, and Marius Dalian Doran. 2020. The Nexus between Carbon Emissions, Energy Use, Economic Growth and Financial Development: Evidence from Central and Eastern European Countries. Sustainability 12: 7747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Matthew, Oluwatoyin, Romanus Osabohien, Fagbeminiyi Fasina, and Afolake Fasina. 2018. Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Health Outcomes in Nigeria: Empirical Insight from ARDL Technique. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy 8: 43–50. [Google Scholar]
- Mehra, Meeta Keswani, and Deepti Kohli. 2018. Environmental Regulation and Intra-Industry Trade. International Economics Journal 32: 133–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Moutinho, Victor, and Mara Madaleno. 2020. Economic growth assessment through an ARDL approach: The case of African OPEC countries. Energy Reports 6: 305–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Odugbesan, Jamiu Adetola, and Husam Rjoub. 2020. Relationship Among Economic Growth, Energy Consumption, CO2 Emission, and Urbanization: Evidence from MINT Countries. Sage Open, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Özokcu, Selin, and Özlem Özdemir. 2017. Economic Growth, Energy, and Environmental Kuznets Curve. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Review 72: 639–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pata, Ugur Korkut, and Abdullah Emre Caglar. 2021. Investigating the EKC hypothesis with renewable energy consumption, human capital, globalization and trade openness for China: Evidence from augmented ARDL approach with a structural break. Energy 216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pesaran, M. Hashem, Yongcheol Shin, and Richard J. Smith. 2001. Bounds testing approaches to the analysis of level relationships. Journal of Applied Econometrics 16: 289–326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Roy, Jayjit. 2017. On the Environmental Consequences of Intraindustry Trade. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 83: 50–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Salazar-Núñez, Héctor F., Francisco Venegas-Martínez, and Miguel Á. Tinoco-Zermeño. 2020. Impact of Energy Consumption and Carbon Dioxide Emissions on Economic Growth: Cointegrated Panel Data in 79 Countries Grouped by Income Level. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy 10: 218–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Sarkodie, Samuel Asumadu, and Ilhan Ozturk. 2020. Investigating the Environmental Kuznets Curve hypothesis in Kenya: A multivariate analysis. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 117: 109481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shaari, Mohd Shahidan, Zulkefly Abdul Karim, and Noorazeela Zainol Abidin. 2020. The Effects of Energy Consumption and National Output on CO2 Emissions: New Evidence from OIC Countries Using a Panel ARDL Analysis. Sustainability 12: 3312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Shahbaz, Muhammad, Farooq Ahmed Jam, Sadia Bibi, and Nanthakumar Loganathan. 2016. Multivariate Granger Causality between CO2 Emissions, Energy intensity and Economic Growth in Portugal: Evidence from Cointegration and Causality Analysis. Technological and Economic Development of Economy 22: 47–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shahbaz, Muhammad, Rajesh Sharma, Avik Sinha, and Zhilun Jiao. 2021. Analyzing nonlinear impact of economic growth drivers on CO2 emissions: Designing an SDG framework for India. Energy Policy 148: 111965. [Google Scholar]
- Sun, Huaping, Samuel Attuquaye Clottey, Yong Geng, Kai Fang, and Joshua Clifford Kofi Amissah. 2019. Trade Openness and Carbon Emissions: Evidence from Belt and Road Countries. Sustainability 11: 2682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Sun, Huaping, Love Enna, Augustine Monney, Dang Khoa Tran, Ehsan Rasoulinezhad, and Farhad Taghizadeh-Hesary. 2020. The Long-Run Effects of Trade Openness on Carbon Emissions in Sub-Saharan African Countries. Energies 13: 5295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tong, Teng, Jaime Ortiz, Chuanhua Xu, and Fangjhy Li. 2020. Economic growth, energy consumption, and carbon dioxide emissions in the E7 countries: A bootstrap ARDL bound test. Energy Sustainability and Society 10: 20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC). 1992. FCCC/INFORMAL/84 GE.05-62220 (E) 200705. Available online: https://unfccc.int/resource/docs/2015/cop21/eng/l09r01.pdf (accessed on 10 January 2021).
- Wawrzyniak, Dorota, and Wirginia Doryń. 2020. Does the quality of institutions modify the economic growth-carbon dioxide emissions nexus? Evidence from a group of emerging and developing countries. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja 33: 124–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yazdani, Mehdi, and Hamed Pirpour. 2020. Evaluating the Effect of Intra-industry Trade on the Bilateral Trade Productivity for Petroleum Products of Iran. Energy Economics 86: 103933. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, Xingping, Haonan Zhang, and Jiahai Yuan. 2019. Economic Growth, Energy Consumption, and Carbon Emission Nexus: Fresh evidence from developing countries. Environmental Science Pollution Research 26: 26367–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Dependent Variable | Source | |
LogCO2—Logarithm of carbon dioxide emissions | World Bank–World Development Indicators (2020) | |
Independent Variables | Expected signs | Source |
LogEC—Logarithm of energy use per capita | [+] | World Bank–World Development Indicators (2020) |
LogTRADE—Logarithm of trade intensity | [−] | World Bank–World Development Indicators (2020) |
LogGDP—Logarithm of income per capita based on purchasing power parity (PPP) | [+; −] | World Bank–World Development Indicators (2020) |
Variables | Observations | LogCO2 | LogEC | LogTRADE | LogGDP |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
LogCO2 | 47 | 1.000 | |||
LogEC | 47 | 0.996 | 1.000 | ||
LogTRADE | 47 | −0.251 | −0.169 | 1.000 | |
LogGDP | 47 | 0.933 | 0.980 | −0.339 | 1.000 |
Variables | Level | 1st Difference |
---|---|---|
LogCO2 | 2.532 (0.996) | −2.244 ** (0.025) |
LogEC | 3.3009 (0.999) | −2.069 ** (0.038) |
LogTRADE | −2.597 ** (0.010) | −3.246 *** (0.002) |
LogGDP | −2.187 (0.992) | −3.1512 ** (0.002) |
Variables | Coef. |
---|---|
ADJLogCO2(−1) | −0.781 *** (0.000) |
Long Run (LR) | |
LogEC | 1.464 *** (0.000) |
LogTRADE | −0.195 *** (0.004) |
LogGDP | −0.393 ** (0.036) |
Short Run (SR) | |
LogGDP D1 | 0.215 (0.238) |
LD | 0.399 ** (0.013) |
C Adj. R2 | 3.316 ** (0.013) 0.818 |
Pesaran et al. (2001) Bounds Test | ||||||||
F = 31.896 | T = −10.906 | Case 3 | ||||||
sample (3 variables, 43 observations, 2 short-run coefficients) | ||||||||
Kripfganz and Schneider (2018) Critical Values and Approximate p-Values | ||||||||
10% | 5% | 1% | p-value | |||||
I(0) | I(1) | I(0) | I(1) | I(0) | I(1) | I(0) | I(1) | |
F | 2.885 | 4.030 | 3.506 | 4.790 | 4.960 | 6.547 | 0.000 | 0.000 |
T | −2.560 | −3.449 | −2.901 | −3.832 | −3.588 | −4.594 | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Durbin–Watson d-Statistic | Breusch–Godfrey LM Test for Autocorrelation | White’s Test |
---|---|---|
(7.43) = 1.551 | Prob > chi2 = 0.110 | Prob > chi2 = 0.150 |
Hypothesized No of CE (s) | Eigenvalue | Trace Statistic | 0.05 Critical Value | p-Value |
---|---|---|---|---|
None | 0.527 | 58.413 | 47.856 | 0.003 |
At most 1 | 0.340 | 24.763 | 29.7970 | 0.170 |
At most 2 | 0.077 | 6.006 | 15.494 | 0.695 |
At most 3 | 0.051 | 2.385 | 15.495 | 0.695 |
Hypothesized No of CE (s) | Eigenvalue | Max-Eigen Statistic | 0.05 Critical Value | p-Value |
---|---|---|---|---|
None | 0.527 | 33.650 | 27.584 | 0.007 |
At most 1 | 0.341 | 18.756 | 21.132 | 0.104 |
At most 2 | 0.077 | 3.620 | 14.264 | 0.897 |
At most 3 | 0.052 | 2.385 | 3.841 | 0.122 |
Quantiles | LogEC | LogTRADE | LogGDP |
---|---|---|---|
0.1 | 1.411 *** (0.000) | −0.460 *** (0.000) | −0.008 (0.855) |
0.2 | 1.294 *** (0.000) | −0.353 *** (0.000) | 0.029 (0.160) |
0.3 | 1.285 *** (0.000) | −0.348 *** (0.000) | 0.031 (0.167) |
0.4 | 1.249 *** (0.000) | −0.329 *** (0.000) | 0.043 ** (0.026) |
0.5 | 1.186 *** (0.000) | −0.262 *** (0.000) | 0.063 *** (0.000) |
0.6 | 1.194 *** (0.000) | −0.281 *** (0.000) | 0.062 *** (0.002) |
0.7 | 1.165 *** (0.000) | −0.279 *** (0.000) | 0.069 *** (0.000) |
0.8 | 1.163 *** (0.000) | −0.278 *** (0.000) | 0.070 *** (0.000) |
0.9 | 1.107 *** (0.000) | −0.229 *** (0.000) | 0.088 *** (0.000) |
Variables | FMOLS | CCR | DOLS |
---|---|---|---|
LogEC | 1.387 *** (0.000) | 1.393 *** (0.000) | 1.511 *** (0.000) |
LogTRADE | −0.265 *** (0.000) | −0.265 *** (0.000) | −0.232 *** (0.000) |
LogGDP | −0205 * (0.094) | −0.212 * (0.061) | −0.421 ** (0.039) |
C | 2.370 ** (0.039) | 2.424 ** (0.019) | 4.396 ** (0.018) |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2021 by the author. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Leitão, N.C. Testing the Role of Trade on Carbon Dioxide Emissions in Portugal. Economies 2021, 9, 22. https://doi.org/10.3390/economies9010022
Leitão NC. Testing the Role of Trade on Carbon Dioxide Emissions in Portugal. Economies. 2021; 9(1):22. https://doi.org/10.3390/economies9010022
Chicago/Turabian StyleLeitão, Nuno Carlos. 2021. "Testing the Role of Trade on Carbon Dioxide Emissions in Portugal" Economies 9, no. 1: 22. https://doi.org/10.3390/economies9010022
APA StyleLeitão, N. C. (2021). Testing the Role of Trade on Carbon Dioxide Emissions in Portugal. Economies, 9(1), 22. https://doi.org/10.3390/economies9010022