Identifying Sustainability and Knowledge Gaps in Socio-Economic Pathways Vis-à-Vis the Sustainable Development Goals
1
Transitions to New Technologies Program, International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, Schlossplatz, 1-A-2361 Laxenburg, Austria
2
School of Geography and Environment, University of Oxford, South Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3QY, UK
3
Ecosystem Services and Management Program, International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, Schlossplatz, 1-A-2361 Laxenburg, Austria
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Economies 2018, 6(2), 20; https://doi.org/10.3390/economies6020020
Received: 31 October 2017
/
Revised: 18 February 2018
/
Accepted: 19 February 2018
/
Published: 26 March 2018
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Selected Papers from the International Conference on Sustainable Development 2017, September 18-20, 2017 New York, USA)
With the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), the global community has set itself an ambitious development agenda. Current analytical and quantitative modeling capabilities fall short of being able to capture all 17 SDGs and their targets. Even highly ambitious and optimistic pathways currently used in research, such as SSP1/SSP1-2.6, do not meet all SDGs (sustainability gaps) and fail to provide information on some of them (knowledge gaps). We show that for research and modeling purposes, the SDG targets can serve as a basis but need to be operationalized to reduce complexity and also to account for long-term sustainability concerns beyond 2030. We have explored here the requirements for assessing more comprehensively the sustainability of development pathways, guided by holistic interpretation of the SDGs to enable an assessment of the potential embedded synergies and trade-offs between the economic, social and environmental objectives. We see this as call for action for science to work on filling these gaps. At the same time, this is also a call for policy makers and the global community to close the sustainability gaps that emerge from such analysis. We anticipate that such analysis will provide useful information for policy advice and investment decisions during implementation of the UN 2030 Agenda.
View Full-Text
Keywords:
sustainable development goals; SDG; integrated development pathways; Shared Socio-economic Pathways; SSP; sustainable development; transformation
▼
Show Figures
Figure 1
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited
MDPI and ACS Style
Zimm, C.; Sperling, F.; Busch, S. Identifying Sustainability and Knowledge Gaps in Socio-Economic Pathways Vis-à-Vis the Sustainable Development Goals. Economies 2018, 6, 20. https://doi.org/10.3390/economies6020020
AMA Style
Zimm C, Sperling F, Busch S. Identifying Sustainability and Knowledge Gaps in Socio-Economic Pathways Vis-à-Vis the Sustainable Development Goals. Economies. 2018; 6(2):20. https://doi.org/10.3390/economies6020020
Chicago/Turabian StyleZimm, Caroline, Frank Sperling, and Sebastian Busch. 2018. "Identifying Sustainability and Knowledge Gaps in Socio-Economic Pathways Vis-à-Vis the Sustainable Development Goals" Economies 6, no. 2: 20. https://doi.org/10.3390/economies6020020
Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.
