Review Reports

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Dear Authors,

The manuscript has been very extensive. It definitely gained in value. However section ‘4. Conclusion’ still needs to be expanded. There is no link between the research results and the theoretical basis.

8.12.2021

Author Response

Dear  Reviewer 

Thanks for reviewing our manuscript.

"The manuscript has been very extensive. It definitely gained in value. However section ‘4. Conclusion’ still needs to be expanded. There is no link between the research results and the theoretical basis."

The work was checked by 3 reviewers and we took into account the comments of the editor of the journal. Therefore, after 11 pages of text, what was in the first version is now 29 pages.

To strengthen the links between the sections and to justify them, we have added additional literature (references) and the text of a scientific article.

 

Reviewer 2 Report

The article presents the sectoral structure of cruise tourism, identifies the
factors influencing the level of demand and supply of cruise tourism products.

However, "cruise tourism" is missing in the title. 

Otherwise, a wider literature review is needed.

Author Response

Dear Reviewer 

Your comments have been taken into account and corrected in the article

The work was checked by 3 reviewers and we took into account the comments of the editor of the journal. Therefore, after 11 pages of text, what was in the first version is now 29 pages. To strengthen the links between the sections and to justify them, we have added additional literature (references) and the text of a scientific article. We have adjusted the title because the new information contains a wider range of economic value data and shows the maritime position of the industry.  Completed the data and indicators section. Indicated the connecting sections of information for the industry and justified the choice of topics. It also shows the state of the industry during the period of COVID - 19.