Next Article in Journal
Mass Proportion, Bioactive Compounds and Antioxidant Capacity of Carrot Peel as Affected by Various Solvents
Next Article in Special Issue
Measurement of Assistive Technology Outcomes Associated with Computer-Based Writing Interventions for Children and Youth with Disabilities
Previous Article in Journal
Characterization of 316L Steel Cellular Dodecahedron Structures Produced by Selective Laser Melting
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Provision of Powered Mobility Devices in Italy: Linking Process with Outcomes
Open AccessArticle

Capturing the True Value of Assistive Technologies to Consumers in Routine Outcome Measurement

LifeTec Australia, Brisbane 4051, Australia
School of Health and Rehabiliation Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane 4072, Australia
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Academic Editor: Jeffrey W. Jutai
Technologies 2016, 4(4), 35;
Received: 25 May 2016 / Revised: 30 September 2016 / Accepted: 1 October 2016 / Published: 14 October 2016
PDF [452 KB, uploaded 14 October 2016]


(1) Background: Recent reforms in Australia, providing people with disability and older people with choice and control over allocated funding, have altered consumer expectations and transformed the landscape of assistive technology (AT) service provision. The purpose of this study is to report on the routine AT outcomes of people who accessed an AT consultation service and examine how well these capture the impact of AT on their lives; (2) Methods: This study, which uses mixed methods for concurrent triangulation of the data, reports on the outcomes for 127 people who acquired a range of assistive technology in 2015 and examines the adequacy of an existing service outcome framework in capturing the true value of these technologies to AT users. Outcome data was routinely collected by a community service 2–4 months following an AT consultation. A telephone or face-to-face interview gathered demographic information as well as AT outcomes, using two standardized tools, the Individualized Prioritised Problem Assessment (IPPA) and the EATS 6D. Qualitative comments relating to the impact of the AT on the person’s life were also documented; (3) Results: The acquired AT generally met or exceeded expectations of the person using the AT and the attending health professional. Overall, people experienced decreased difficulty and increased feelings of autonomy, with most of the reported improvements identified in mobility and usual activities; (4) Conclusion: Routine outcome data provide some evidence of the value of AT in addressing concerns as identified by clients. Qualitative data, which captured the impact of AT on people’s lives, suggest that the empowering and transformative aspects of AT are not currently being captured by existing measures. View Full-Text
Keywords: routine outcome measurement; assistive technology; service delivery routine outcome measurement; assistive technology; service delivery

Figure 1

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited (CC BY 4.0).

Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

De Jonge, D.; Stevens, W. Capturing the True Value of Assistive Technologies to Consumers in Routine Outcome Measurement. Technologies 2016, 4, 35.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics



[Return to top]
Technologies EISSN 2227-7080 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top