Next Article in Journal
Sensor-Health- and Belief-Aware Risk-Adaptive High-Order Control Barrier Function Safety Filtering for Dynamic Obstacle Avoidance
Previous Article in Journal
Portable Holonomic Educational Robot Platform for Home Laboratory—Study Case: AI-Based Electromyography Control
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Article

Robust Integration of Fault-Tolerant Observer and CBF Safety Control: A Separation Principle Approach

1
School of Automation, Southeast University, Nanjing 210018, China
2
China Unicom Internet of Things Co., Ltd., Nanjing 210016, China
3
China Unicom Digital Technology Co., Ltd., Beijing 100032, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Technologies 2026, 14(5), 309; https://doi.org/10.3390/technologies14050309
Submission received: 14 April 2026 / Revised: 15 May 2026 / Accepted: 16 May 2026 / Published: 20 May 2026

Abstract

Autonomous vehicles must enforce safety constraints even when their state estimates are corrupted by sensor faults and disturbances. This paper develops a separation-based robust safety-control framework that couples a fault-tolerant observer with a control barrier function (CBF) safety filter through an explicit estimation-error envelope. First, a uniformly ultimately bounded observer-error estimate is derived. This bound is then injected into an estimated-state robust CBF condition, yielding safety margins that account for both observation error and bounded disturbances. The construction is further extended to time-varying safe sets induced by moving obstacles. For implementation, the resulting condition is realized as a quadratic-program safety filter with high-order obstacle and lane constraints. Simulations on a nonlinear 3-DOF bicycle model evaluate bias faults, gust-like disturbances, dense traffic, and tightened stress tests. Compared with a standard CBF baseline and observer/safety-filter ablations, the proposed method preserves nonnegative safety margins while keeping slack activation negligible. Additional sensitivity experiments quantify the trade-off among safety margin, slack usage, observer accuracy, control conservatism, and QP computation time. The results support the proposed architecture as a practical bridge between bounded state estimation and fault-aware safety filtering.
Keywords: autonomous driving; control barrier function; fault-tolerant observer; safety filter; sensor faults; robust safety control autonomous driving; control barrier function; fault-tolerant observer; safety filter; sensor faults; robust safety control
Graphical Abstract

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ma, Y.; Zhu, H.; Zhang, G.; Huang, Y. Robust Integration of Fault-Tolerant Observer and CBF Safety Control: A Separation Principle Approach. Technologies 2026, 14, 309. https://doi.org/10.3390/technologies14050309

AMA Style

Ma Y, Zhu H, Zhang G, Huang Y. Robust Integration of Fault-Tolerant Observer and CBF Safety Control: A Separation Principle Approach. Technologies. 2026; 14(5):309. https://doi.org/10.3390/technologies14050309

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ma, Yongsheng, Hongwei Zhu, Guobao Zhang, and Yongming Huang. 2026. "Robust Integration of Fault-Tolerant Observer and CBF Safety Control: A Separation Principle Approach" Technologies 14, no. 5: 309. https://doi.org/10.3390/technologies14050309

APA Style

Ma, Y., Zhu, H., Zhang, G., & Huang, Y. (2026). Robust Integration of Fault-Tolerant Observer and CBF Safety Control: A Separation Principle Approach. Technologies, 14(5), 309. https://doi.org/10.3390/technologies14050309

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop