Multi-Factor Statistical Analysis and Numerical Modeling of an Anode-Supported SOFC Fueled by Synthetic Diesel Using Taguchi Orthogonal Arrays
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. SOFC Theoretical Basis and Model
2.1. Electrochemical Reactions
2.2. Numerical Modeling
3. Numerical Setup
3.1. Geometries and Mesh Independence
3.2. Boundary Conditions, Solver Settings, and Physics
4. Validation Process
5. Design of Experiments
6. Results and Discussion
6.1. DoE Numerical Results
6.2. Multiple-Factor Linear Regression Model Results
6.3. Design Guidelines for Catalyst Layers in Hydrocarbon-Fueled SOFCs
7. Limitations and Future Research Directions
8. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Matsumoto, K.; Tachikawa, Y.; Lyth, S.M.; Matsuda, J.; Sasaki, K. Performance and durability of Ni–Co alloy cermet anodes for solid oxide fuel cells. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 2022, 47, 29441–29455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lin, C.; Kerscher, F.; Herrmann, S.; Steinrücken, B.; Spliethoff, H. Analysis on temperature uniformity in methane-rich internal reforming solid oxide fuel cells. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 2024, 57, 769–788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gheorghe, L.; Lucian, M.; Dorel, S.; Florentina-Cătălina, N. The Transition to an Eco-Friendly City as a First Step Toward Climate Neutrality with Green Hydrogen. Technologies 2025, 13, 95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhu, R.; Li, Y.; Huang, X.; Xia, Y.; Tu, Y.; Zheng, B.; Qiu, J.; Zhang, X. Carbon Emission Reduction Capability Analysis of Electricity–Hydrogen Integrated Energy Storage Systems. Technologies 2025, 13, 472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Śreniawski, K.K.; Moździerz, M.; Brus, G.; Szmyd, J.S. Transport phenomena in a banded solid oxide fuel cell stack—Part 2: Numerical analysis. Energies 2023, 16, 4512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cui, D.; Sciazko, A.; Komatsu, Y.; Nakamura, A.; Hara, T.; Wu, S.; Xiao, R.; Shikazono, N. Three-dimensional microstructures of carbon deposition on Ni-YSZ anodes under polarization. J. Energy Chem. 2023, 87, 359–367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shi, J.; Xue, X. Microstructure optimization designs for anode-supported planar solid oxide fuel cells. J. Fuel Cell Sci. Technol. 2011, 8, 10–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Subotić, V.; Schluckner, C.; Stoeckl, B.; Reichholf, D.; Lawlor, V.; Pofahl, S.; Schröttner, H.; Hochenauer, C. In-operando detection of carbon depositions and carbon formation predictions for industrial-sized SOFCs fueled with synthetic diesel reformate. ECS Meet. Abstr. 2017, MA2017-03, 210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Subotić, V.; Thaller, T.; Königshofer, B.; Menzler, N.H.; Bucher, E.; Egger, A.; Hochenauer, C. Performance assessment of industrial-sized solid oxide cells operated in a reversible mode: Detailed numerical and experimental study. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 2020, 45, 29166–29185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ali, A.B.M.; Nemah, A.K.; Al Bahadli, Y.A.; Kianfar, E. Principles, performance, types, advantages and disadvantages of fuel cells: A review. Case Stud. Chem. Environ. Eng. 2024, 10, 100920. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rabuni, M.F.; Li, T.; Othman, M.H.D.; Adnan, F.H.; Li, K. Progress in solid oxide fuel cells with hydrocarbon fuels. Energies 2023, 16, 6404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, Y.; Li, X.; Guo, Z.; Wang, K.; Cao, Y. Effect of the reactant transportation on performance of a planar solid oxide fuel cell. Energies 2021, 14, 1212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mirzaee Fashalameh, K.; Sadeghian, Z.; Ebrahimi, R. A high-performance planar anode-supported solid oxide fuel cell with hierarchical porous structure through slurry-based three-dimensional printing. J. Alloys Compd. 2022, 916, 165406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mehrabian, M.; Mahmoudimehr, J. Optimizing steam-to-carbon and air-to-carbon ratios in internal autothermal reforming of a biogas-fed solid oxide fuel cell using computational fluid dynamics and artificial intelligence. Energy Convers. Manag. 2026, 348, 120763. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lu, Y.; Gasper, P.; Pal, U.B.; Gopalan, S.; Basu, S.N. Improving intermediate temperature performance of Ni-YSZ cermet anodes for solid oxide fuel cells by liquid infiltration of nickel nanoparticles. J. Power Sources 2018, 396, 257–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Szaro, N.A.; Ammal, S.C.; Chen, F.; Heyden, A. Theoretical investigation of the electrochemical oxidation of H2 and CO fuels on a Ruddlesden–Popper SrLaFeO4-δ anode. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2023, 15, 30139–30151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Pukazhselvan, D.; Sandhya, K.S.; Fagg, D.P.; Blaabjerg, F. The future of clean transportation: Hydrogen, batteries, ammonia, and green methane in perspective. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2026, 226, 116286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bhuiyan, M.M.H.; Siddique, Z. Hydrogen as an alternative fuel: A comprehensive review of challenges and opportunities in production, storage, and transportation. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 2025, 102, 1026–1044. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wu, Z.; Zhu, P.; Huang, Y.; Yao, J.; Yang, F.; Zhang, Z.; Ni, M. A comprehensive review of modeling of solid oxide fuel cells: From large systems to fine electrodes. Chem. Rev. 2025, 125, 2184–2268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gohar, O.; Khan, M.Z.; Saleem, M.; Chun, O.; Babar, Z.U.D.; Rehman, M.M.U.; Hussain, A.; Zheng, K.; Koh, J.-H.; Ghaffar, A.; et al. Navigating the future of solid oxide fuel cells: Comprehensive insights into fuel electrode-related degradation mechanisms and mitigation strategies. Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 2024, 331, 103241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Larminie, J.; Dicks, A. Fuel Cell Systems Explained, 2nd ed.; Wiley: Chichester, UK, 2013. [Google Scholar]
- Boudghene, S. Fuel cells: The expectations for an environmental-friendly and sustainable source of energy. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2011, 15, 4507–4520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sembler, W.J.; Kumar, S. Optimization of a single-cell solid oxide fuel cell using computational fluid dynamics. J. Fuel Cell. Sci. Technol. 2011, 8, 021007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bertei, A.; Nucci, B.; Nicolella, C. Microstructural modeling for prediction of transport properties and electrochemical performance in SOFC composite electrodes. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2013, 101, 175–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- El-Fergany, A.A.; Agwa, A.M. Red-Billed Blue Magpie Optimizer for Electrical Characterization of Fuel Cells with Prioritizing Estimated Parameters. Technologies 2024, 12, 156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schluckner, C.; Subotic, V.; Lawlor, V.; Hochenauer, C. Three-dimensional numerical and experimental investigation of an industrial-sized SOFC fueled by diesel reformate—Part I: Creation of a base model for further carbon deposition modeling. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 2014, 39, 19102–19118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, X.; Espinoza, M.; Li, T.; Andersson, M. Parametric study for electrode microstructure influence on SOFC performance. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 2021, 46, 37440–37459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tikiz, I.; Taymaz, I.; Pehlivan, H. CFD modelling and experimental validation of cell performance in a 3-D planar SOFC. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 2019, 44, 15441–15455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schluckner, C.; Subotic, V.; Lawlor, V.; Hochenauer, C. Three-dimensional numerical and experimental investigation of an industrial-sized SOFC fueled by diesel reformate—Part II: Detailed reformed chemistry and carbon deposition analysis. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 2015, 40, 10943–10959. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Subotić, V.; Schluckner, C.; Hochenauer, C. An experimental and numerical study of performance of large planar ESC-SOFCs and experimental investigation of carbon depositions. J. Energy Inst. 2016, 89, 121–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chan, S.H.; Khor, K.A.; Xia, Z.T. A complete polarization model of a solid oxide fuel cell and its sensitivity to the change of cell component thickness. J. Power Sources 2001, 93, 130–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ni, M.; Leung, M.K.H.; Leung, D.Y.C. Parametric study of solid oxide fuel cell performance. Energy Convers. Manag. 2007, 48, 1525–1535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Haseli, Y. Maximum conversion efficiency of hydrogen fuel cell. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 2018, 43, 9015–9021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Khazaee, I.; Rava, A. Numerical simulation of the performance of solid oxide fuel cell with different flow channel geometries. Energy 2017, 119, 235–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- O’Hayre, R.; Cha, S.-W.; Colella, W.; Prinz, F.B. Fuel Cell Fundamentals, 3rd ed.; John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2016. [Google Scholar]
- Ramírez-Minguela, J.J. Energy and entropy study of a SOFC using biogas from different sources considering internal reforming of methane. Int. J. Heat. Mass. Transf. 2018, 120, 1044–1054. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jo, D.H.; Chun, J.H.; Park, K.T.; Hwang, J.W.; Lee, J.Y.; Jung, H.W.; Kim, S.H. Optimization of physical parameters of solid oxide fuel cell electrode using electrochemical model. Korean J. Chem. Eng. 2011, 28, 1884–1890. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fan, L.; Dimitriou, E.; Pourquie, M.J.B.M.; Liu, M.; Verkooijen, A.H.M.; Aravind, P.V. Prediction of the performance of a solid oxide fuel cell fuelled with biosyngas: Influence of different steam-reforming reaction kinetic parameters. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 2013, 38, 510–524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vakouftsi, E.; Marnellos, G.E.; Athanasiou, C.; Coutelieris, F. CFD modeling of a biogas fuelled SOFC. Solid State Ion. 2011, 192, 458–463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sumi, H. Co-electrolysis SOEC and internal reforming SOFC for achieving a carbon-neutral society. RSC Sustain. 2024, 2, 1568–1581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rokni, M. Biomass gasification integrated with a solid oxide fuel cell and Stirling engine. Energy 2014, 77, 6–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Suwanwarangkul, R.; Croiset, E.; Entchev, E.; Charojrochkul, S.; Pritzker, M.D.; Fowler, M.W.; Douglas, P.L.; Chewathanakup, S.; Mahaudom, H. Experimental and modeling study of solid oxide fuel cell operating with syngas fuel. J. Power Sources 2006, 161, 308–322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Andersson, M.; Yuan, J.; Sundén, B. SOFC modeling considering hydrogen and carbon monoxide as electrochemical reactants. J. Power Sources 2013, 232, 42–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lawlor, V.; Hochenauer, C.; Griesser, S.; Zauner, G.; Buchinger, G.; Meissner, D.; Olabi, A.G.; Klein, K.; Kuehn, S.; Cordiner, S.; et al. The use of a high-temperature wind tunnel for MT-SOFC testing—Part II: Use of computational fluid dynamics software in order to study previous measurements. J. Fuel Cell Sci. Technol. 2011, 8, 061019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]










| Parameter | Value |
|---|---|
| Cell channels | 1 |
| Temperature | 1073 K |
| Pressure | 1 atm |
| CO mol fraction | 0.137 |
| CH4 mol fraction | 0.0225 |
| CO2 mol fraction | 0.098 |
| H2O mol fraction | 0.113 |
| H2 mol fraction | 0.154 |
| N2 mol fraction | 0.4755 |
| Current | 5 A |
| Fuel mass flow rate | 4.974 × 10−6 kg/s |
| Air mass flow rate | 2.886 × 10−6 kg/s |
| Number of Channels | Elements | Nodes | Aspect Ratio | Quality |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 151,500 | 163,915 | 8.4 | 0.9123 |
| 2 | 216,000 | 230,547 | 8.4 | 0.9123 |
| 3 | 252,000 | 267,732 | 8.4 | 0.9123 |
| Constant | MSR | WGS |
|---|---|---|
| , J/kmol | 8.2 × 107 | 11.6 × 104 |
| , kmol/m3·s | 4.274 × 108 | 2.56 × 107 |
| Element | Value | Units |
|---|---|---|
| Electrical conductivity | 3.33 × 105 | (Ω·m)−1 |
| Contact resistance | 1 × 10−7 | Ω·m2 |
| Density | 3030 | kg/m3 |
| Specific heat | 595.1 | J/kg·K |
| Thermal conductivity | 6.23 | W/m·K |
| Porosity | 0.3 | - |
| Tortuosity | 3 | - |
| Anodic transfer coefficient | 0.5 | - |
| Material | Ni-YSZ | - |
| Element | Value | Units |
|---|---|---|
| Electrical conductivity | 7937 | (Ω·m)−1 |
| Contact resistance | 1 × 10−8 | Ω·m2 |
| Density | 4375 | kg/m3 |
| Specific heat | 565 | J/kg·K |
| Thermal conductivity | 1.15 | W/m·K |
| Porosity | 0.3 | - |
| Tortuosity | 3 | - |
| Anodic transfer coefficient | 0.5 | - |
| Material | LSM | - |
| Element | Value | Units |
|---|---|---|
| Electrical conductivity | 1.5 × 107 | (Ω·m)−1 |
| Density | 8900 | kg/m3 |
| Specific heat | 446 | J/kg·K |
| Thermal conductivity | 91 | W/m·K |
| Material | Nickel | - |
| Element | Value | Units |
|---|---|---|
| Electrical conductivity | 1.5 × 107 | (Ω·m)−1 |
| Density | 21,200 | kg/m3 |
| Specific heat | 140 | J/kg·K |
| Thermal conductivity | 72 | W/m·K |
| Material | Platinum | - |
| Element | Value | Units |
|---|---|---|
| Anode thickness | 300 | µm |
| Cathode thickness | 30 | µm |
| Channel width | 0.0025 | m |
| Channel height | 0.002 | m |
| Cell length | 0.09 | m |
| Electrolyte thickness | 10 | µm |
| Element | Value | Units |
|---|---|---|
| Current sub-relaxation factor | 0.3 | - |
| Air mass flow rate | 2.886 × 10−6 | kg/s |
| Fuel mass flow rate | 4.974 × 10−6 | kg/s |
| Electrolyte material | YSZ | - |
| Electrolyte resistance | Equation (19) | Ω·m |
| Factors Levels | Temp, K | Fuel Mass Flow, kg/s | Pressure, atm | Current, A | Number of Channels | Methane, XCH4 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1023 | 2.886 × 10−6 | 1 | 5 | 1 | 0.0225 |
| 2 | 1073 | 3.055 × 10−6 | 7.5 | 6 | 2 | 0.04855 |
| 3 | 1123 | 3.224 × 10−6 | 10 | 7 | 3 | 0.0746 |
| Specie | Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| CH4 | 0.0225 | 0.04855 | 0.0746 |
| H2 | 0.1591 | 0.07855 | 0.1143 |
| H2O | 0.2233 | 0.2598 | 0.2962 |
| CO | 0.1370 | 0.1370 | 0.1370 |
| N2 | 0.3481 | 0.3661 | 0.3822 |
| CO2 | 0.11 | 0.11 | 0.11 |
| Factors Levels | Temp, K | Fuel Mass Flow, kg/s | Pressure, atm | Current, A | Number of Channels | Methane, XCH4 | Voltage, V |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1023 | 2.886 × 10−6 | 1 | 5 | 1 | 0.0225 | 0.4026 |
| 2 | 1023 | 2.886 × 10−6 | 1 | 5 | 2 | 0.04855 | 0.4548 |
| 3 | 1023 | 2.886 × 10−6 | 1 | 5 | 3 | 0.0746 | 0.5065 |
| 4 | 1023 | 3.055 × 10−6 | 7.5 | 6 | 1 | 0.0225 | 0.4460 |
| 5 | 1023 | 3.055 × 10−6 | 7.5 | 6 | 2 | 0.04855 | 0.4991 |
| 6 | 1023 | 3.055 × 10−6 | 7.5 | 6 | 3 | 0.0746 | 0.5521 |
| 7 | 1023 | 3.224 × 10−6 | 10 | 7 | 1 | 0.0225 | 0.4533 |
| 8 | 1023 | 3.224 × 10−6 | 10 | 7 | 2 | 0.04855 | 0.5064 |
| 9 | 1023 | 3.224 × 10−6 | 10 | 7 | 3 | 0.0746 | 0.5594 |
| 10 | 1073 | 2.886 × 10−6 | 7.5 | 7 | 1 | 0.04855 | 0.3835 |
| 11 | 1073 | 2.886 × 10−6 | 7.5 | 7 | 2 | 0.0746 | 0.4365 |
| 12 | 1073 | 2.886 × 10−6 | 7.5 | 7 | 3 | 0.0225 | 0.3406 |
| 13 | 1073 | 3.055 × 10−6 | 10 | 5 | 1 | 0.04855 | 0.6800 |
| 14 | 1073 | 3.055 × 10−6 | 10 | 5 | 2 | 0.0746 | 0.7330 |
| 15 | 1073 | 3.055 × 10−6 | 10 | 5 | 3 | 0.0225 | 0.6371 |
| 16 | 1073 | 3.224 × 10−6 | 1 | 6 | 1 | 0.04855 | 0.5782 |
| 17 | 1073 | 3.224 × 10−6 | 1 | 6 | 2 | 0.0746 | 0.6346 |
| 18 | 1073 | 3.224 × 10−6 | 1 | 6 | 3 | 0.0225 | 0.5322 |
| 19 | 1123 | 2.886 × 10−6 | 10 | 6 | 1 | 0.0746 | 0.6175 |
| 20 | 1123 | 2.886 × 10−6 | 10 | 6 | 2 | 0.0225 | 0.5215 |
| 21 | 1123 | 2.886 × 10−6 | 10 | 6 | 3 | 0.04855 | 0.5746 |
| 22 | 1123 | 3.055 × 10−6 | 1 | 7 | 1 | 0.0746 | 0.5173 |
| 23 | 1123 | 3.055 × 10−6 | 1 | 7 | 2 | 0.0225 | 0.4260 |
| 24 | 1123 | 3.055 × 10−6 | 1 | 7 | 3 | 0.04855 | 0.4745 |
| 25 | 1123 | 3.224 × 10−6 | 7.5 | 5 | 1 | 0.0746 | 0.8511 |
| 26 | 1123 | 3.224 × 10−6 | 7.5 | 5 | 2 | 0.0225 | 0.7552 |
| 27 | 1123 | 3.224 × 10−6 | 7.5 | 5 | 3 | 0.04855 | 0.8082 |
| Level | Temp | Fuel Mass Flow | Pressure | Current | Number of Channels | Methane |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0.4840 | 0.4716 | 0.5036 | 0.6483 | 0.5477 | 0.5023 |
| 2 | 0.5513 | 0.5490 | 0.5609 | 0.5480 | 0.5519 | 0.5517 |
| 3 | 0.6169 | 0.6316 | 0.5876 | 0.4559 | 0.5526 | 0.5982 |
| Δ | 0.1329 | 0.1601 | 0.0840 | 0.1923 | 0.0049 | 0.0959 |
| Rank | 3 | 2 | 5 | 1 | 6 | 4 |
| Case | Temp, K | Fuel Mass Flow, kg/s | Pressure, atm | Current, A | Number of Channels | Methane, XCH4 | VEq | VAnsys | Erel | Eabs |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1048 | 3.0550 × 10−6 | 8 | 5.5 | 4 | 0.06150 | 0.6117 | 0.6065 | 0.86 | 0.0052 |
| 2 | 1073 | 2.8860 × 10−6 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 0.02250 | 0.4197 | 0.4096 | 2.47 | 0.0101 |
| 3 | 1023 | 3.1395 × 10−6 | 4.5 | 6.5 | 2 | 0.04855 | 0.4613 | 0.4512 | 2.24 | 0.0101 |
| 4 | 1073 | 2.9705 × 10−6 | 2.5 | 7.5 | 1 | 0.03550 | 0.3066 | 0.2989 | 2.58 | 0.0077 |
| 5 | 1123 | 3.2240 × 10−6 | 7 | 5 | 6 | 0.07460 | 0.8592 | 0.8499 | 1.09 | 0.0093 |
| 6 | 1060 | 3.2073 × 10−6 | 7.6 | 4.9 | 2 | 0.03063 | 0.6934 | 0.6785 | 2.20 | 0.0149 |
| 7 | 1029 | 3.1788 × 10−6 | 6.4 | 5.6 | 6 | 0.02544 | 0.5588 | 0.5326 | 4.92 | 0.0262 |
| 8 | 1095 | 3.2032 × 10−6 | 1 | 7.4 | 1 | 0.03835 | 0.4427 | 0.4431 | 0.09 | 0.0004 |
| 9 | 1075 | 3.0320 × 10−6 | 3.6 | 5 | 2 | 0.02493 | 0.5750 | 0.5701 | 0.86 | 0.0049 |
| 10 | 1120 | 2.9647 × 10−6 | 1.8 | 5 | 4 | 0.04929 | 0.6318 | 0.6298 | 0.32 | 0.0020 |
| 11 | 1082 | 2.9017 × 10−6 | 6.5 | 2.1 | 2 | 0.07194 | 0.9110 | 0.8954 | 1.74 | 0.0156 |
| 12 | 1120 | 3.1592 × 10−6 | 3.7 | 1.6 | 4 | 0.03506 | 1.0399 | 1.0077 | 3.20 | 0.0322 |
| 13 | 1091 | 3.0922 × 10−6 | 8.5 | 2.1 | 1 | 0.03598 | 0.9616 | 0.9587 | 0.30 | 0.0029 |
| 14 | 1089 | 2.9914 × 10−6 | 5.7 | 4.6 | 6 | 0.02413 | 0.6421 | 0.6325 | 1.52 | 0.0096 |
| 15 | 1107 | 3.0380 × 10−6 | 4.6 | 7 | 6 | 0.03271 | 0.4560 | 0.4399 | 3.66 | 0.0161 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.
Share and Cite
Estrada-Herrera, A.U.; Urbina-Salas, I.; Rodriguez-Alejandro, D.A.; Ramírez-Minguela, J.d.J.; Valtierra-Rodriguez, M.; Elizalde-Blancas, F. Multi-Factor Statistical Analysis and Numerical Modeling of an Anode-Supported SOFC Fueled by Synthetic Diesel Using Taguchi Orthogonal Arrays. Technologies 2026, 14, 271. https://doi.org/10.3390/technologies14050271
Estrada-Herrera AU, Urbina-Salas I, Rodriguez-Alejandro DA, Ramírez-Minguela JdJ, Valtierra-Rodriguez M, Elizalde-Blancas F. Multi-Factor Statistical Analysis and Numerical Modeling of an Anode-Supported SOFC Fueled by Synthetic Diesel Using Taguchi Orthogonal Arrays. Technologies. 2026; 14(5):271. https://doi.org/10.3390/technologies14050271
Chicago/Turabian StyleEstrada-Herrera, Alan Uriel, Ismael Urbina-Salas, David Aaron Rodriguez-Alejandro, José de Jesús Ramírez-Minguela, Martin Valtierra-Rodriguez, and Francisco Elizalde-Blancas. 2026. "Multi-Factor Statistical Analysis and Numerical Modeling of an Anode-Supported SOFC Fueled by Synthetic Diesel Using Taguchi Orthogonal Arrays" Technologies 14, no. 5: 271. https://doi.org/10.3390/technologies14050271
APA StyleEstrada-Herrera, A. U., Urbina-Salas, I., Rodriguez-Alejandro, D. A., Ramírez-Minguela, J. d. J., Valtierra-Rodriguez, M., & Elizalde-Blancas, F. (2026). Multi-Factor Statistical Analysis and Numerical Modeling of an Anode-Supported SOFC Fueled by Synthetic Diesel Using Taguchi Orthogonal Arrays. Technologies, 14(5), 271. https://doi.org/10.3390/technologies14050271

