Next Article in Journal
Profitability Determinants of Financial Institutions: Evidence from Banks in Pakistan
Next Article in Special Issue
Multi-Factor Asset-Pricing Models under Markov Regime Switches: Evidence from the Chinese Stock Market
Previous Article in Journal
The Impact of Brexit on the Stock Markets of the Greater China Region
Previous Article in Special Issue
An Empirical Examination of the Incremental Contribution of Stock Characteristics in UK Stock Returns
Open AccessArticle

Risk-Based Portfolios with Large Dynamic Covariance Matrices

1
Nomura Asset Management Co., Ltd. 1-12-1 Nihonbashi, Chuo-ku, 103-0027 Tokyo, Japan
2
Graduate School of Business Sciences, University of Tsukuba, 3-29-1 Otsuka, Bunkyo-ku, 112-0012 Tokyo, Japan
3
Department of Risk Engineering, University of Tsukuba, 1-1-1 Tennodai, 305-8577 Tsukuba, Japan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Financial Stud. 2018, 6(2), 52; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijfs6020052
Received: 15 February 2018 / Revised: 9 May 2018 / Accepted: 10 May 2018 / Published: 14 May 2018
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Asset Pricing and Portfolio Choice)
In the field of portfolio management, practitioners are focusing increasingly on risk-based portfolios rather than on mean-variance portfolios. Risk-based portfolios are constructed based solely on covariance matrices, and include methods such as minimum variance (MV), risk parity (RP), and maximum diversification (MD). It is well known that the performance of a mean-variance portfolio depends on the accuracy of the estimations of the inputs. However, no studies have examined the relationship between the performance of risk-based portfolios and the estimated accuracy of covariance matrices. In this research, we compare the performance of risk-based portfolios for several estimation methods of covariance matrices in the Japanese stock market. In addition, we propose a highly accurate estimation method called cDCC-NLS, which incorporates nonlinear shrinkage into the cDCC-GARCH model. The results confirm that (1) the cDCC-NLS method shows the best estimation accuracy, (2) the RP and MD do not depend on the estimation accuracy of the covariance matrix, and (3) the MV does depend on the estimation accuracy of the covariance matrix. View Full-Text
Keywords: (c)DCC-GARCH; nonlinear shrinkage; minimum variance; risk parity; maximum diversification (c)DCC-GARCH; nonlinear shrinkage; minimum variance; risk parity; maximum diversification
MDPI and ACS Style

Nakagawa, K.; Imamura, M.; Yoshida, K. Risk-Based Portfolios with Large Dynamic Covariance Matrices. Int. J. Financial Stud. 2018, 6, 52.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Search more from Scilit
 
Search
Back to TopTop