Next Article in Journal
Pharmacy Practice and Education in Austria
Next Article in Special Issue
Lecture 1—Justification of the Value of Clinical Pharmacy Services and Clinical Indicators Measurements—Introductory Remarks from a Traveler on a 40-Year Wayfaring Journey with Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Care
Previous Article in Journal
Women’s Beliefs on Early Adherence to Adjuvant Endocrine Therapy for Breast Cancer: A Theory-Based Qualitative Study to Guide the Development of Community Pharmacist Interventions
 
 
Conference Report

Briefing Note: Proceedings of the Singapore National Clinical Pharmacy Colloquium—Health Manpower Development Planning

by 1,2,* and 3,4
1
St. Christopher’s Hospital for Children, American Academic Health System, Philadelphia, PA 19134, USA
2
School of Pharmacy, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA 23298, USA
3
Department of Pharmacy, National University of Singapore, Singapore 117543, Singapore
4
Ministry of Health, Pharmacy Services, Government of Singapore, Singapore 117543, Singapore
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Pharmacy 2018, 6(2), 54; https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmacy6020054
Received: 23 May 2018 / Revised: 4 June 2018 / Accepted: 7 June 2018 / Published: 12 June 2018
The nation of Singapore highly values its health service as well as the component of healthcare delivery that includes clinical pharmacy and administration. The Ministry of Health (MOH) engaged the services of Dr. Richard Parrish to better understand the relationship between the Singaporean citizenry and its clinical pharmacists. Through a series of five lectures, structured from the national to local unit level, four roundtables, two hands-on sessions, and three workshops, clinical pharmacists and administrative leadership participated in “open-mic” style lectures, discussed the issues facing Singapore pharmacy in its current provision of healthcare services, and deliberated on the future resources required to meet projected healthcare needs. From three distinct perspectives, these discussions were very frank, transparent, and passionate about what practitioners and administrators thought Singaporean health leadership needed to address in terms of (1) what programs and practices to continue; (2) what ones to start; and (3) what ones to evaluate. Each of the areas below will be framed using these three perspectives in order to clearly reflect the ideas and suggestions expressed in each of the 14 group sessions. These recommendations are forwarded to MOH pharmacy leadership for consideration and action. In addition, we met with MOH leaders regarding non-medical prescribing (NMP), and discussed strategies and tactics that seemed successful as well as unsuccessful in other jurisdictions when adopting expanded scope models for clinical pharmacists and other qualified healthcare providers that include prescribing of medications. View Full-Text
Keywords: clinical pharmacy; human resources; Singapore; non-medical prescribing; practice standards clinical pharmacy; human resources; Singapore; non-medical prescribing; practice standards
MDPI and ACS Style

Parrish, R.H., II; Chew, L. Briefing Note: Proceedings of the Singapore National Clinical Pharmacy Colloquium—Health Manpower Development Planning. Pharmacy 2018, 6, 54. https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmacy6020054

AMA Style

Parrish RH II, Chew L. Briefing Note: Proceedings of the Singapore National Clinical Pharmacy Colloquium—Health Manpower Development Planning. Pharmacy. 2018; 6(2):54. https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmacy6020054

Chicago/Turabian Style

Parrish, Richard H., II, and Lita Chew. 2018. "Briefing Note: Proceedings of the Singapore National Clinical Pharmacy Colloquium—Health Manpower Development Planning" Pharmacy 6, no. 2: 54. https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmacy6020054

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop