# State-of-the-Art and Advancement Paths for Inductive Pulsed Plasma Thrusters

^{1}

^{2}

^{3}

^{*}

## Abstract

**:**

## 1. Introduction

## 2. Review of Inductive Pulsed Plasma Thrusters

#### 2.1. Open Magnetic Flux Thrusters

#### 2.1.1. Planar Thrusters

#### 2.1.2. Conical Theta-Pinch Thrusters

#### 2.2. Closed Magnetic Flux Thrusters

#### 2.2.1. Field-Reversed Theta-Pinch FRCs

#### 2.2.2. Rotating Magnetic Field FRC Thrusters

#### Principle of Operation

#### Review of RMF-FRC Test Articles

#### Technical Obstacles to Testing

#### 2.2.3. Annular FRC Thrusters

#### 2.3. Summary of Experimental Data

## 3. Review of Modeling Techniques

#### 3.1. Open Magnetic Flux Thrusters

#### 3.1.1. Planar Thruster Modeling

#### 3.1.2. Conical Theta-Pinch Thruster Modeling

#### 3.2. Closed Magnetic Flux Thrusters

#### 3.2.1. Thruster Scaling Laws

#### Efficiency from Energy Conservation

#### Performance Metrics from Asymptotic Analysis of Equivalent Circuits

#### Challenges in Deriving Scaling Laws

#### 3.2.2. Equivalent Circuit Models

#### Equivalent Circuit Model for a Stationary Plasmoid

#### Calibrated Equivalent Circuit Model to Estimate Energy Deposition in FRC

#### Circuit Model for Second Stage Acceleration of an FRC Plasmoid

#### Equivalent Circuit Model for FRC Translation including RMF Coils

#### Equivalent Circuit Model for Annular FRC Translation

#### Challenges with Equivalent Circuit Modeling

#### 3.2.3. High-Fidelity Models

#### Magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) Fluid Models

#### Two-Fluid Models

#### Kinetic Models

#### High Fidelity Modeling Challenges

## 4. Review of Major Subsystems

#### 4.1. Power

#### 4.1.1. Power Processing Units

#### EMPT and ELF Thruster PPU

#### UM RMF-FRC PPU

#### 4.1.2. Discharge Circuit

#### Discharge Circuit Topologies

#### Inductive Energy Recapture

#### Switches

^{®}rated up to 9 kA of peak current. Later testing used a distributed array of smaller, higher efficiency IGBTs made by IXYS

^{®}. The faster switching times of both IGBT models enabled the EMPT to achieve the first reported multi-pulse operation of an IPPT at multi-kHz repetition rates [47]. Paralleling of multiple high power IGBTs was found to enable peak discharge currents up to 20 kA in the 30 kW ELF thruster [85].

#### Capacitors

#### 4.2. Drive Coil

#### 4.3. Propellant Management and Injection

#### 4.4. Preionization

#### 4.5. Cooling

#### 4.6. External Fields

## 5. Advancement Paths: Modeling

#### 5.1. Formation Physics

#### 5.1.1. IPPT Current Sheet Formation

#### Key Physics and Requirements for Current Sheet Formation

#### Current Sheet Formation Scaling to Lower Energy per Pulse

#### Propellant Mass and Energy Loss during Current Sheet Formation

#### Current Sheet Stability on Formation and Acceleration Timescales

#### 5.1.2. FRC Formation

#### Key Physics and Requirements for FRC formation at Low Discharge Energy

#### Propellant Mass and Energy Losses During FRC Formation

#### 5.2. Acceleration Physics

#### 5.2.1. Identification and Scaling of Dominant Acceleration Mechanisms

#### 5.2.2. Influence of Changing Plasma Geometry on Inductive Acceleration

#### 5.3. Molecular Propellant Physics

#### 5.3.1. Influence of Plasma Chemistry on the Design and Scaling of IPPTs

#### 5.3.2. Importance of Recombination in the Presence of Large Temperature Gradients

#### 5.4. Effects of Asymmetric Charge Exchange Reactions

## 6. Advancement Paths: Major Subsystems

#### 6.1. Power

#### 6.1.1. Discharge Circuit

#### Discharge Circuit Topology

#### Inductive Energy Recapture

#### Capacitors

#### Switches

^{10}pulses) expected over the course of a typical mission. Encouragingly, failure in time (FIT) rates for modern IGBTs in terrestiral applications are typically on the order of ${10}^{-9}$ failures per device-hour [110,111]. While promising work by Kirtley et al. [85,86] demonstrated IGBT operation in excess of 10

^{9}pulses in benchtop PPU endurance testing efforts, it must be confirmed that this longevity can be replicated in an actual thruster. In addition, care should be exercised when attempting to broadly extend these findings, since switches in different IPPTs may be subjected to vastly different operating conditions. Extended lifetime testing of a wide range of solid-state switches, either as part of broader IPPT lifetime testing or under conditions meant to closely replicate IPPT operation, should be conducted before these devices can be considered to possess sufficient lifetime. Detailed reliability models for solid-state switches operating in a relevant space environment will likely need to be developed with a focus on identifying critical switch failure modes. The inclusion of realistic thermal and power cycling will be important when developing these models, since switch reliability and lifetime are critically impacted by these factors [110]. Moreover, implementation of condition monitoring systems is recommended so the performance and state of the devices over the course of lifetime testing can be carefully recorded, allowing for more accurate quantification of the risk of device failure.

#### IPPT PPUs

#### 6.1.2. Circuit Modeling

^{®}.

#### 6.2. Propellant Injection

#### 6.3. Preionization

## 7. Conclusions

## Author Contributions

## Funding

## Acknowledgments

## Conflicts of Interest

## References

- Jahn, R.G. Physics of Electric Propulsion; McGraw-Hill: New York, NY, USA, 1968. [Google Scholar]
- Lovberg, R.H.; Hayworth, B.R.; Gooding, T. The Use of a Coaxial Plasma Gun for Plasma Propulsion; Technical Report TR AE62-0678; Convair/General Dynamics: San Diego, CA, USA, 1962.
- Dailey, C.L.; Lovberg, R.H. The PIT MkV Pulsed Inductive Thruster; Technical Report NASA CR 191155; TRW Space & Technology Group: Redondo Beach, CA, USA, 1993. [Google Scholar]
- Hallock, A.K.; Martin, A.K.; Polzin, K.A.; Kimberlin, A.C.; Eskridge, R.H. Single- and Repetitive-Pulse Conical Theta-Pinch Inductive Pulsed Plasma Thruster Performance. IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci.
**2015**, 43, 433–443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Kirtley, D.; Gallimore, A.D.; Haas, J.; Reilly, M. High density magnetized toroid formation and translation within XOCOT: An annular field reversed configuration plasma concept. In Proceedings of the 30th International Electric Propulsion Conference, Florence, Italy, 17–20 September 2007. IEPC Paper 2007-041. [Google Scholar]
- Martin, A.; Eskridge, R.; Lee, M.; Koelfgen, S.; Fimognari, P. The plasmoid thruster experiment (PTX). In Proceedings of the 46th APS Division of Plasma Physics Meeting, Savannah, GA, USA, 15–19 November 2004. Paper RM2.007. [Google Scholar]
- Polzin, K.A. Comprehensive review of planar pulsed inductive plasma thruster research and technology. J. Propuls. Power
**2011**, 27, 513–531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Tuszewski, M. Field Reversed Configurations. Nucl. Fusion
**1988**, 28, 2033–2092. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version] - Hrbud, I.; LaPointe, M.; Vondra, R.; Dailey, C.L.; Lovberg, R. Status of pulsed inductive thruster research. AIP Conf. Proc.
**2002**, 608, 627–632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version] - Lovberg, R.H.; Dailey, C.L. A PIT Primer; Technical Report TR 005; RLD Associates: Lebanon, PA, USA, 1994. [Google Scholar]
- Dailey, C.L. Pulsed Electromagnetic Thruster; Technical Report AFRPL-TR-71-107; TRW Systems Group: Redondo Beach, CA, USA, 1971. [Google Scholar]
- Dailey, C.L.; Davis, H.A. Pulsed Plasma Propulsion Technology; Technical Report AFRPL-TR-73-81; TRW Systems Group: Redondo Beach, CA, USA, 1973. [Google Scholar]
- Lovberg, R.H.; Dailey, C.L. Large Inductive Thruster Performance Measurement. AIAA J.
**1982**, 20, 971–977. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Dailey, C.L.; Lovberg, R.H. Pulsed Inductive Thruster Component Technology; Technical Report AFAL-TR-87-012; TRW Space and Technology Group: Redondo Beach, CA, USA, 1987. [Google Scholar]
- Choueiri, E.Y.; Polzin, K.A. Faraday acceleration with radio-frequency assisted discharge. J. Propuls. Power
**2006**, 22, 611–619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Polzin, K.A. Faraday Accelerator With Radio-Frequency Assisted Discharge (FARAD). Ph.D. Thesis, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA, 2006. Thesis Number 3147-T. [Google Scholar]
- Polzin, K.A.; Rose, M.F.; Miller, R. Laboratory-Model Integrated System FARAD Thruster. In Proceedings of the 44th AIAA/SAE/ASME/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference, Hartford, CT, USA, 21–23 July 2008. AIAA Paper 2008-4821. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Martin, A.K.; Dominguez, A.; Eskridge, R.H.; Polzin, K.A.; Riley, D.P.; Perdue, K.A. Design and Testing of a Small Inductive Pulsed Plasma Thruster. In Proceedings of the 34th International Electric Propulsion Conference, Kobe-Hyogo, Japan, 4–10 July 2015. IEPC Paper 2015-50. [Google Scholar]
- Polzin, K.A.; Martin, A.K.; Eskridge, R.H.; Kimberlin, A.C.; Addona, B.M.; Devineni, A.P.; Dugal-Whitehead, N.R.; Hallock, A.K. Summary of the 2012 Inductive Pulsed Plasma Thruster Development and Testing Program; Technical Report NASA/TP-2013-217488; NASA-Marshall Space Flight Center: Huntsville, AL, USA, 2013.
- Steinhauer, L.C. Review of field-reversed configurations. Phys. Plasmas
**2011**, 18, 070501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Barnes, D.C.; Seyler, C.E.; Anderson, D.V. Compact torus theory: MHD equilibrium and stability. In Proceedings of the US-Japan Joint Symposium on Compact Toruses and Energetic Particle Injection, Princeton, NJ, USA, 11–14 December 1979. [Google Scholar]
- Tuszewski, M.; Gupta, D.; Gupta, S.; Onofri, M.; Osin, D.; Deng, B.H.; Dettrick, S.A.; Hubbard, K.; Gota, H.; TAE Team. Equilibrium properties of hybrid field reversed configurations. Phys. Plasmas
**2017**, 24, 012502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version] - Guo, H.; Binderbauer, M.; Tajima, T.; Milroy, R.D.; Steinhauer, L.C.; Yang, X.; Garate, E.G.; Gota, H.; Korepanov, S.; Necas, A.; et al. Achieving a long-lived high-beta plasma state by energetic beam injection. Nat. Commun.
**2015**, 6, 6897. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Slough, J.; Votroubek, G.; Pihl, C. Creation of a high-temperature plasma through merging and compression of supersonic field reversed configuration plasmoids. Nucl. Fusion
**2011**, 51, 053008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Gota, H.; Binderbauer, M.; Tajima, T.; Putvinski, S.; Tuszewski, M.; Deng, B.; Dettrick, S.; Gupta, D.; Korepanov, S.; Magee, R.; et al. Formation of hot, stable, long-lived field-reversed configuration plasmas on the C-2W device. Nucl. Fusion
**2019**, 59, 112009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version] - Rosenbluth, M.N.; Bussac, M.N. MHD stability of Spheromak. Nucl. Fusion
**1979**, 19, 489–498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Armstrong, W.T.; Linford, R.K.; Lipson, J.; Platts, D.A.; Sherwood, E.G. Field-reversed experiments (FRX) on compact toroids. Phys. Fluids
**1981**, 24, 2068–2089. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Rej, D.J.; Armstrong, W.T.; Chrien, R.E.; Klingner, P.L.; Linford, R.K.; McKenna, K.F.; Sherwood, E.G.; Siemon, R.E.; Tuszewski, M.; Milroy, R.D. Experimental studies of field-reversed configuration translation. Phys. Fluids
**1986**, 29, 852–862. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Weber, T.; Intrator, T.; Smith, R. Plasma-gun-assisted field-reversed configuration formation in a conical θ-pinch. Phys. Plasmas
**2015**, 22, 042518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Koelfgen, S.; Eskridge, R.; Lee, M.; Martin, A.; Hawk, C.; Fimognari, P. Magnetic and Langmuir probe measurements on the plasmoid thruster experiment (PTX). In Proceedings of the 40th AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference and Exhibit, Fort Lauderdale, FL, USA, 11–14 July 2004. AIAA Paper 2004-4094. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Fimognari, P.J.; Cassibry, J.T.; Ims, K.E. Effects of Pre-ionization and Bias Field on Plasmoid Formation and Acceleration. In Proceedings of the 43rd AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference and Exhibit, Cincinnati, OH, USA, 8–11 July 2007. AIAA Paper 2007-5262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Weber, B.V.; Hinshelwood, D.D. He–Ne interferometer for density measurements in plasma opening switch experiments. Rev. Sci. Instrum.
**1992**, 63, 5199–5201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Markusic, T.E. Current Sheet Canting in Pulsed Electromagnetic Accelerators. Ph.D. Thesis, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA, 2002. Thesis Number 3102-T. [Google Scholar]
- Berkery, J.W. Current Sheet Mass Leakage in a Pulsed Plasma Accelerator. Ph.D. Thesis, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA, 2005. Thesis Number 3144-T. [Google Scholar]
- Fimognari, P.J., III. A Magnetic and Interferometric Study of a Plasma Formed in a Conical-Theta-Pinch. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Alabama in Huntsville, Huntsville, AL, USA, 2007. [Google Scholar]
- Eskridge, R.H.; Fimognari, P.J.; Martin, A.K.; Lee, M.H. Design and Construction of the PT-1 Prototype Plasmoid Thruster. AIP Conf. Proc.
**2006**, 813, 474–483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Slough, J.; Votroubek, G. Magnetically accelerated plasmoid (MAP) propulsion. In Proceedings of the 42nd AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference & Exhibit, Sacramento, CA, USA, 9–12 July 2006. AIAA Paper 2004-4654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pahl, R.; Rovey, J. Pre-ionization plasma in an FRC test article. In Proceedings of the 50th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting, Nashville, TN, USA, 9–12 July 2012. AIAA Paper 2012-194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Pahl, R.A.; Rovey, J.L. Effects of DC Preionization Voltage and Radial Location on Pulsed Inductive Plasma Formation. IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci.
**2015**, 43, 3883–3888. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Hoffman, A.L.; Guo, H.Y.; Slough, J.T.; Tobin, S.J.; Schrank, L.S.; Reass, W.A.; Wurden, G.A. The TCS Rotating Magnetic Field FRC Current-Drive Experiment. Fusion Sci. Technol.
**2002**, 41, 92–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Blevin, H.A.; Thonemann, P.C. Plasma confinement using an alternating magnetic field. In Conference on Plasma Physics and Controlled Nuclear Fusion Research; Nuclear Fusion Supplement, Part 1; International Atomic Energy Agency: Vienna, Austria, 1962; pp. 55–60. [Google Scholar]
- Slough, J.; Kirtley, D.; Weber, T. Pulsed plasmoid propulsion: The ELF thruster. In Proceedings of the 31st International Electric Propulsion Conference, Ann Arbor, MI, USA, 20–24 September 2009. IEPC Paper 2009-265. [Google Scholar]
- Woods, J.M.; Sercel, C.L.; Gill, T.M.; Viges, E.; Jorns, B.A. Data-Driven Approach to Modeling and Development of a 30 kW Field-reversed Configuration Thruster. In Proceedings of the 36th International Electric Propulsion Conference, Vienna, Austria, 15–20 September 2019. IEPC Paper 2019-717. [Google Scholar]
- Weber, T.E.; Slough, J.T.; Kirtley, D. The electrodeless Lorentz force (ELF) thruster experimental facility. Rev. Sci. Instrum.
**2012**, 83, 113509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Furukawa, T.; Takizawa, K.; Kuwahara, D.; Shinohara, S. Electrodeless plasma acceleration system using rotating magnetic field method. AIP Adv.
**2017**, 7, 115204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Furukawa, T.; Shimura, K.; Hachisu, K.; Shinohara, S.; Yamamura, S.; Kuwahara, D. Electrodeless Helicon Plasma Thruster Employing Additional Electromagnetic Acceleration Methods. In Proceedings of the 36th International Electric Propulsion Conference, Vienna, Austria, 15–20 July 2019. IEPC Paper 2019-A-198. [Google Scholar]
- Kirtley, D.; Slough, J.; Pfaff, M.; Pihl, C. Steady operation of an electromagnetic plasmoid thruster. In Proceedings of the 5th Joint Army-Navy-NASA-Air Force (JANNAF) Spacecraft Propulsion Subcommittee Meeting, Huntsville, AL, USA, 2011. [Google Scholar]
- Justin, K.; Martin, R.; Sousa, E.M. High Fidelity Modeling of Field-Reversed Configuration (FRC) Thrusters; Technical Report AFRL-RQ-ED-TR-2017-0002; Air Force Research Laboratory: Edwards AFB, CA, USA, 2017. [Google Scholar]
- Li, G. Time-Resolved Emission Spectroscopy of Field Reversed Configuration Thruster; Technical Report AFRL-RQ-ED-VG-2016-276; Air Force Research Laboratory: Edwards AFB, CA, USA, 2016. [Google Scholar]
- Schmidt, G.; Jacobson, D.; Patterson, M.; Ganapathi, G.; Brophy, J.; Hofer, R. Electric Propulsion Research and Development at NASA. In Proceedings of the Space Propulsion Conference, Seville, Spain, 16–18 May 2018. Paper SP2018 00389. [Google Scholar]
- Weber, T. The Electrodeless Lorentz Force Thruster Experiment. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA, 2010. [Google Scholar]
- Wong, A.R.; Toftul, A.; Polzin, K.A.; Pearson, J.B. Non-contact thrust stand calibration method for repetitively pulsed electric thrusters. Rev. Sci. Instrum.
**2012**, 83, 025103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version] - Brown, D.L.; Beal, B.E.; Haas, J.M. Air Force Research laboratory High Power Electric Propulsion Technology Development. In Proceedings of the IEEE Aerospace Conference, Big Sky, MT, USA, 6–13 March 2010. IEEEAC Paper 1549. [Google Scholar]
- Hill, C.S. Translation Studies on an Annular Field Reversed Configuration Device for Space Propulsion. Ph.D. Thesis, Michigan Technological University, Houghton, MI, USA, 2012. [Google Scholar]
- Phillips, J. Proposal to Produce Large Compact Toroids; Technical Report LA-8711-P; Los Alamos National Laboratory: Los Alamos, NM, USA, 1981.
- Alidieres, M.; Aymar, R.; Jourdan, P.; Koechlin, F.; Samain, A. Acceleration d’un plasma dans une configuration de striction. Plasma Phys.
**1967**, 9, 73–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Kirtley, D.E. Study of the Synchronous Operation of an Annular Field Reversed Configuration Device. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA, 2008. [Google Scholar]
- Kirtley, D.; Pancotti, A.; Slough, J.; Pihl, C. Steady operation of an FRC thruster on Martian atmosphere and liquid water propellants. In Proceedings of the 48th AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference & Exhibit, Atlanta, GA, USA, 30 July–1 August 2012. AIAA Paper 2012-4071. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Martin, A.K.; Eskridge, R.H. Electrical coupling efficiency of inductive plasma accelerators. J. Phys. D Appl. Phys.
**2005**, 38, 4168–4179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Polzin, K.A.; Choueiri, E.Y. Performance optimization criteria for pulsed inductive plasma acceleration. IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci.
**2006**, 34, 945–953. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Polzin, K.A. Scaling and systems considerations in pulsed inductive plasma thrusters. IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci.
**2008**, 36, 2189–2198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Polzin, K.A.; Reneau, J.P. Effect of Conductive Walls on the Performance of a Pulsed Inductive Thruster. IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci.
**2009**, 37, 359–364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Polzin, K.A. Pulsed Inductive Plasma Acceleration: Optimization. In Encyclopedia of Plasma Technology; Shohet, J., Ed.; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2016; pp. 1191–1200. [Google Scholar]
- Polzin, K.A.; Sankaran, K.; Ritchie, A.G.; Reneau, J.P. Inductive pulsed plasma thruster model with time-evolution of energy and state properties. J. Phys. D Appl. Phys.
**2013**, 46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version] - Mikellides, P.G.; Neilly, C. Modeling and Performance Analysis of the Pulsed Inductive Thruster. J. Propuls. Power
**2007**, 23, 51–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Mikellides, P.G.; Ratnayake, N. Modeling of the Pulsed Inductive Thruster Operating on Ammonia propellant. J. Propuls. Power
**2007**, 23, 854–862. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Mikellides, P.G.; Villarreal, J.K. High Energy Pulsed Inductive Thruster Modeling Operating with Ammonia Propellant. J. Appl. Phys.
**2007**, 102, 103301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Allison, D.L.; Mikellides, P.G. A High-Temperature, Thermal Non-Equilibrium Equation of State for Ammonia. Int. J. Thermophys.
**2006**, 27, 794–819. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Mikellides, P.; Villarreal, J. Numerical Modeling of a Low Energy Pulsed Inductive Thruster. In Proceedings of the 44th AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference & Exhibit, Hartford, CT, USA, 21–23 July 2008. AIAA Paper 2008-4726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Che, B.X.; Cheng, M.S.; Li, X.K.; Guo, D.W. Physical mechanisms and factors influencing inductive pulsed plasma thruster performance: A numerical study using an extended magnetohydrodynamic model. J. Phys. D Appl. Phys.
**2018**, 51, 365202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Hallock, A.K. Effect of Inductive Coil Geometry on the Operating Characteristics of a Pulsed Inductive Plasma Accelerator. Ph.D. Thesis, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA, 2012. Thesis Number 3252-T. [Google Scholar]
- Martin, A.K. Performance scaling of inductive pulsed plasma thrusters with coil angle and pulse rate. J. Phys. D Appl. Phys.
**2016**, 49, 025201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Polzin, K.; Rose, M.F.; Miller, R.; Best, S.; Owens, T.; Dankanich, J. Design of a low-energy FARAD thruster. In Proceedings of the 43rd AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference & Exhibit, Cincinnati, OH, USA, 8–11 July 2007. AIAA Paper 2007-5257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Woods, J.M.; Jorns, B.A.; Gallimore, A.D. Circuit Modeling of Rotating Magnetic Field Field-reversed Configuration Thrusters. In Proceedings of the AIAA Propulsion and Energy Forum, Cincinnati, OH, USA, 9–11 July 2018. AIAA paper 2018-4911. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hugrass, W.N.; Okada, T.; Ohnishi, M. Plasma-circuit Interactions in Rotating Magnetic Field Current Drive. Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion
**2008**, 50, 055008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Little, J.; Cornella, B.; Pancotti, A.; Kirtley, D. Scaling of FRC Thrusters with Neutral Entrainment. In Proceedings of the 8th Joint Army-Navy-NASA-Air Force (JANNAF) Spacecraft Propulsion Subcommittee Meeting, Phoenix, AZ, USA, 5–8 December 2016. [Google Scholar]
- Ji, H.; Yamada, M.; Kulsrud, R.; Pomphrey, N.; Himura, H. Studies of Global Stability of Field-Reversed Configuration Plasmas Using a Rigid Body Model. Phys. Plasmas
**1998**, 5, 3685–3693. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Niemela, C.S.; King, L.B. Numerical Optimization of an Annular Field Reversed Configuration Translation Experiment. In Proceedings of the 31st International Electric Propulsion Conference, Ann Arbor, MI, USA, 20–24 September 2009. IEPC paper 2009-008. [Google Scholar]
- Milroy, R.D.; Brackbill, J.U. Numerical studies of a field-reversed theta-pinch plasma. Phys. Fluids
**1982**, 25, 775–783. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Slough, J. Multi-megawatt propulsion based on a compact toroid thruster. In Proceedings of the 29th International Electric Propulsion Conference, Princeton, NJ, USA, 31 October–4 November 2005. IEPC paper 2005-296. [Google Scholar]
- Meier, E.T. Modeling Plasmas with Strong Anisotropy, Neutral Fluid Effects, and Open Boundaries. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA, 2011. [Google Scholar]
- Milroy, R.D. A numerical study of rotating magnetic fields as a current drive for field reversed configurations. Phys. Plasmas
**1999**, 6, 2771–2780. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Brackbill, J.; Cambier, J.L.; Gimelshein, N.E.; Gimelshein, S.F. Numerical analysis of neutral entrainment effect on field-reversed configuration thruster efficiency. J. Propuls. Power
**2014**, 30, 1450–1458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Patel, M.R. Spacecraft Power Systems; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2004. [Google Scholar]
- Kirtley, D.; Pihl, J.; Pihl, C. Development of a steady operating pulsed power system for FRC and inductive thrusters. In Proceedings of the 33rd International Electric Propulsion Conference, Washington, DC, USA, 6–10 October 2013. IEPC Paper 2013-361. [Google Scholar]
- Kirtley, D.; Pihl, J.; Bernhard, B.; Goff, J. Development, Vibration, and Thermal Characterization of a Steady Operating Pulsed Power System for FRC Thrusters; Technical Report AFRL-RQ-ED-TP-2015-139; Air Force Research Laboratory: Edwards AFB, CA, USA, 2015. [Google Scholar]
- Polzin, K.A.; Rose, M.F.; Miller, R. Operational Characteristics of a Low-Energy FARAD Thruster. In Proceedings of the 44th AIAA/SAE/ASME/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference, Hartford, CT, USA, 21–23 July 2008. AIAA Paper 2008-5011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Pancotti, A.P.; Little, J.M.; Neuhoff, J.S.; Cornella, B.M.; Kirtley, D.E.; Slough, J.T. Electrodeless Lorentz Force (ELF) Thruster for ISRU and Sample Return Mission. In Proceedings of the 34th International Electric Propulsion Conference, Kobe-Hyogo, Japan, 4–10 July 2015. IEPC Paper 2015-67. [Google Scholar]
- Owens, T.L. A pulse-compression-ring circuit for high-efficiency electric propulsion. Rev. Sci. Instrum.
**2008**, 79, 034701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] - Bernardes, J.; Merryman, S. Parameter analysis of a single stage induction mass driver. In Proceedings of the 5th IEEE International Pulsed Power Conference, Washington, DC, USA, 10–12 June 1985; IEEE Paper PI-27. pp. 552–555. [Google Scholar]
- Toftul, A.; Polzin, K.A.; Martin, A.K.; Hudgins, J.L. Testing of Diode-Clamping in an Inductive Pulsed Plasma Thruster Circuit. In Proceedings of the 50th AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference, Cleveland, OH, USA, 28–30 July 2014. AIAA Paper 2014–3503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Poylio, J.H.; Russell, D.; Goldstein, W.; Jackson, B.; Lovberg, R.H.; Dailey, C.L. Pulsed inductive thruster: Flight-scale proof of concept demonstrator. In Proceedings of the 40th AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference & Exhibit, Fort Lauderdale, FL, USA, 11–14 July 2004. AIAA Paper 2004-3640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Raines, T. Propellant Mass Scaling and Decoupling and Improved Plasma Coupling in a Pulsed Inductive Thruster. Master’s Thesis, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, USA, 2018. [Google Scholar]
- Frisbee, R.H. Evaluation of High-Power Solar Electric Propulsion Using Advanced Ion, Hall, MPD, and PIT Thrusters for Lunar and Mars Cargo Missions. In Proceedings of the 42nd AIAA/SAE/ASME/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference & Exhibit, Sacramento, CA, USA, 9–12 July 2006. AIAA Paper 2006-4465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Burkhardt, W.M.; Crapuchettes, J.M.; Addona, B.M.; Polzin, K.A. Development of Long-Lifetime Pulsed Gas Valves for Pulsed Electric Thrusters. In Proceedings of the 51st AIAA/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference & Exhibit, Orlando, FL, USA, 27–29 July 2015. AIAA Paper 2015-4187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Burkhardt, W. Fast Acting Control Valve; Technical Report, NASA SBIR Phase 2 Contract NNX15CM11C; WASK Engineering, Inc.: Cameron Park, CA, USA, 2017. [Google Scholar]
- Dailey, C.L.; Lovberg, R.H. Current sheet structure in an inductive-impulsive plasma accelerator. AIAA J.
**1972**, 10, 125–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Hallock, A.; Choueiri, E.; Polzin, K. Current sheet formation in a conical theta pinch faraday accelerator with radio-frequency assisted discharge. In Proceedings of the 44th AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference & Exhibit, Hartford, CT, USA, 21–23 July 2008; p. 5201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Milroy, R.D.; Brackbill, J.U. Toroidal magnetic field generation during compact toroid formation in a field-reversed theta pinch and a conical theta pinch. Phys. Fluids
**1986**, 29, 1184–1195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Milroy, R.D.; Kim, C.C.; Sovinec, C.R. Extended magnetohydrodynamic simulations of field reversed configuration formation and sustainment with rotating magnetic field current drive. Phys. Plasmas
**2010**, 17, 062502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Choueiri, E. Scaling of thrust in self-field magnetoplasmadynamic thrusters. J. Propuls. Power
**1998**, 14, 744–753. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version] - Takahashi, K.; Lafleur, T.; Charles, C.; Alexander, P.; Boswell, R.W. Electron diamagnetic effect on axial force in an expanding plasma: Experiments and theory. Phys. Rev. Lett.
**2011**, 107, 235001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] - Sheppard, A.J.; Little, J. Scaling laws for electrodeless plasma propulsion with water vapor propellant. Plasma Sources Sci. Technol.
**2020**, 29, 045007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Florescu-Mitchell, A.I.; Mitchell, J.B.A. Dissociative recombination. Phys. Rep.
**2006**, 430, 277–374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Rapp, D.; Francis, W.E. Charge exchange between gaseous ions and atoms. J. Chem. Phys.
**1962**, 37, 2631–2645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Singh, R.; Cooper, J.A.; Melloch, M.R.; Chow, T.P.; Palmour, J.W. SiC power Schottky and PiN diodes. IEEE Trans. Electron Devices
**2002**, 49, 665–672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Morisette, D.T.; Cooper, J.A. Theoretical comparison of SiC PiN and Schottky diodes based on power dissipation considerations. IEEE Trans. Electron Devices
**2002**, 49, 1657–1664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Benson, S.W.; Frus, J.R. Advanced pulsed plasma thruster electrical components. In Proceedings of the 37th AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference and Exhibit, Salt Lake City, UT, USA, 8–11 July 2001. AIAA Paper 2001-3894. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Celem Power Capacitors. Conduction-Cooled Capacitor; CPRI 300; Celem Power Capacitors: Jerusalem, Israel, 2015. [Google Scholar]
- Yang, S.; Xiang, D.; Bryant, A.; Mawby, P.; Ran, L.; Tavner, P. Condition monitoring for device reliability in power electronic converters: A review. IEEE Trans. Power Electron.
**2010**, 25, 2734–2752. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Hudgins, J.L.; De Doncker, R.W. Power semiconductor devices: For variable speed drives. IEEE Ind. Appl. Mag.
**2012**, 18, 18–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Gao, B.; Morgan, A.J.; Xu, Y.; Zhao, X.; Hopkins, D.C. 6.0 kV, 100 A, 175 kHz super cascade power module for medium voltage, high power applications. In Proceedings of the IEEE Applied Power Electronics Conference and Exposition (APEC), San Antonio, TX, USA, 4–8 March 2018; pp. 1288–1293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Millan, J.; Godignon, P.; Perpiñà, X.; Pérez-Tomás, A.; Rebollo, J. A survey of wide bandgap power semiconductor devices. IEEE Trans. Power Electron.
**2013**, 29, 2155–2163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Casady, J.B.; Johnson, R.W. Status of silicon carbide (SiC) as a wide-bandgap semiconductor for high-temperature applications: A review. Solid-State Electron.
**1996**, 39, 1409–1422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Boomer, K.; Lauenstein, J.M.; Hammoud, A. Body of Knowledge for Silicon Carbide Power Electronics; Technical Report; NASA Electronic Parts and Packaging (NEPP) Program, Office of Safety and Mission Assurance: Washington, DC, USA, 2016.
- Hefner, A.R., Jr. INSTANT—IGBT Network Simulation and Transient ANalysis Tool; Spec. Publ. 400-88; National Institute of Standards and Technology: Washington, DC, USA, 1992.
- Perez, S.; Kotecha, R.M.; Rashid, A.U.; Hossain, M.M.; Vrotsos, T.; Francis, A.M.; Mantooth, A.H.; Santi, E.; Hudgins, J.L. A datasheet driven unified Si/SiC compact IGBT model for N-channel and P-channel devices. IEEE Trans. Power Electron.
**2018**, 34, 8329–8341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Hefner, A.R.; Diebolt, D.M. An experimentally verified IGBT model implemented in the Saber circuit simulator. IEEE Trans. Power Electron.
**1994**, 9, 532–542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Mudholkar, M.; Ahmed, S.; Ericson, M.N.; Frank, S.S.; Britton, C.L.; Mantooth, H.A. Datasheet driven silicon carbide power MOSFET model. IEEE Trans. Power Electron.
**2013**, 29, 2220–2228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Tan, C.M.; Tseng, K.J. Using power diode models for circuit simulations—A comprehensive review. IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron.
**1999**, 46, 637–645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

**Figure 1.**(

**a**) Schematic showing the basic operation of a planar IPPT, where the Lorentz body force $\mathbf{f}$ in the axial direction arises from the interaction between the azimuthal plasma current density $\mathbf{j}=-{j}_{p}\widehat{\theta}$ and the radial magnetic field $\mathbf{B}={B}_{r}\widehat{r}$. (

**b**) Sample discharge current from the PIT MK Va for one of the nine parallel coils (from [9]).

**Figure 2.**PIT MK V and MK Va Marx-generator coil configuration: (

**a**) one complete Marx-generator loop and (

**b**) the nine complete loops comprising the entire coil (from [3]).

**Figure 3.**Schematic showing a typical propellant injection scheme employed on the PIT (from [3]).

**Figure 4.**(

**a**) Specific impulse and (

**b**) thrust efficiency as a function of specific energy for the PIT MK Va thruster operating on ammonia propellant (data from [3]).

**Figure 6.**Schematic showing the basic operation of an open magnetic flux conical theta-pinch inductive pulsed plasma thruster. The Lorentz body force $\mathbf{f}$, with components in the radial axial directions, arises from the interaction between the azimuthal plasma current density $\mathbf{j}=-{j}_{p}\widehat{\theta}$ and the radial and axial magnetic field components $\mathbf{B}={B}_{r}\widehat{r}+{B}_{z}\widehat{z}$.

**Figure 7.**Schematic illustrations of conical coil sets containing (

**a**) a spheromak plasma and (

**b**) a field-reversed configuration (FRC) plasma, showing the directional sense of the current in the coils, the azimuthal plasma current ${j}_{p}$, and poloidal magnetic field ${B}_{pol}$, the magnetic field external to the plasma ${B}_{ext}$, and the toroidal magnetic field ${B}_{tor}$ in the spheromak configuration.

**Figure 8.**Schematic showing field-reversed theta pinch formation for closed magnetic flux thrusters: (

**a**) preionization plasma is introduced into a background magnetic field; (

**b**) a strong pulse of current generates a time-dependent magnetic field with polarity opposing the initial background magnetic field that compresses the plasma both radially and axially; (

**c**) a closed magnetic field structure confines the plasma within a separatrix that divides the forward and reverse fields; and (

**d**) magnetic field gradients in the axial direction accelerate and eject the resulting plasmoid (Reproduced/modified from [29]; with the permission of AIP Publishing.).

**Figure 10.**RMF-FRC Operation—(

**a**) Side view cross-section in the r-z plane of the thruster illustrating how ionized gas is injected into the discharge chamber. A steady bias magnetic field with radial gradient is present. (

**b**) End-on view of the thruster in the r-$\theta $ plane depicting two sets of coils oriented in the x- and y-directions that generate a rotating magnetic field (RMF) by using sinusoidal currents at frequency $\omega $ applied 90° out of phase. The RMF induces axial and azimuthal currents. (

**c**) Side view of the r-z plane illustrating FRC formation. Large azimuthal currents form the plasmoid and interact with the external radial magnetic field component to axially accelerate the plasmoid via a Lorentz body force.

**Figure 11.**RMF-FRC test articles: (

**a**) Schematic of Tokyo University electrodeless helicon plasma thruster (from [45]; licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license), (

**b**) MSNW electromagnetic plasma thruster (from [47]; reproduced with permission of the author), (

**c**) Air Force Research Laboratory RP3-X thruster (from [49]), (

**d**) MSNW electrodeless Lorentz force thruster (from [51]; reproduced with permission of the author), (

**e**) CAD model of the University of Michigan RMF thruster (from [43]; reproduced with permission of Electric Rocket Propulsion Society).

**Figure 12.**Diagram of an AFRC thruster (from [53]).

**Figure 13.**XOCOT-T3 experiment (from [54]; reproduced with permission of the author).

**Figure 14.**Circuit models: (

**a**) general lumped-element representation of an IPPT and (

**b**) equivalent circuit (after [16]).

**Figure 15.**Magnetic flux contours calculated with QuickField for a coil with six two-turn leads in parallel and a cone angle of 60°. The plasma thickness is 1 cm. The overall dimensions of the coil are similar to the FARAD coil of Ref. [73].

**Figure 16.**(

**a**) Geometry used to model the coil and plasma coupling in Ref. [75], (

**b**) current waveforms of an ELF discharge with and without a plasma in the thruster (from [51]; reproduced with permission of the author), (

**c**) equivalent circuit model of an RMF-FRC with flux conservers (from [43]; reproduced with permission of Electric Rocket Propulsion Society).

**Figure 17.**Equivalent circuit model of an AFRC (from [54]; reproduced with permission of the author).

**Figure 18.**Numerical simulations of FRC thrusters: (

**a**) Moqui simulation showing acceleration of a plasmoid using sequentially pulsed magnets (from [80]; reproduced with permission of Electric Rocket Propulsion Society), (

**b**) SEL-HiFi simulation shows neutral entrainment by a translating FRC (from [81]; reproduced with permission of the author).

**Figure 19.**Diagram illustrating the location and role of the PPU in stepping-up the voltage for an IPPT capacitor bank.

**Figure 20.**Simplified circuit diagram of the pulse charging PPU used to recharge the capacitor bank of the ELF thruster during continuous operation (based on schematic from [86]).

**Figure 21.**The ELF J6 PPU (from [86]).

**Figure 22.**Mechanical design of a single PPU to supply power to one antenna in the UM 30 kW RMF-FRC (from [43]; reproduced with permission of Electric Rocket Propulsion Society). The low-pass filter for protecting the input source from switching transients is not pictured.

**Figure 23.**Simulated underdamped, critically damped, and overdamped $RLC$ discharge circuit waveforms for the capacitor voltage and current.

**Figure 25.**Pulse compression ring (

**a**) circuit schematic and (

**b**) current and voltage waveforms at each of the three capacitors (Reproduced/modified from [89]; with the permission of AIP Publishing)

**Figure 26.**Example current waveform and IPPT discharge circuit schematic incorporating an IGBT for full-cycle inductive energy recapture.

**Figure 27.**Illustration of a two-turn Archimedes spiral coil with six parallel leads clocked at 60° intervals, indicated by the colors red, orange, green, blue, purple, black. Each lead completes one outward counter-clockwise spiral on the front surface (solid line) and then one inward counter-clockwise spiral on the back surface (dashed line) to return to the initial starting point.

**Figure 28.**(

**a**) A proposed Halbach array-based design for a drive coil and (

**b**) computed flux contours for the proposed configuration (from [93]; reproduced with permission of the author).

**Figure 29.**Continued flow of current after end of second half cycle in the UW HiPeR-PIT discharge circuit, resulting in voltage ringing and loss of charge from the energy storage capacitors.

**Figure 30.**(

**a**) General isolated full bridge resonant CCPS topology and (

**b**–

**e**) popular resonant tank circuit options as denoted (note: many other resonant CCPS variations are possible).

**Figure 31.**Simplified circuit diagram of the UW HiPeR-PIT PPU designed to enable thruster operation at repetition rates from 1 kHz to 10 kHz.

**Figure 32.**Simulated waveforms of the main bank voltage (${V}_{mb}$) and currents through the main bank (${I}_{mb}$ and each of the boost switches (${I}_{b,sw}$), inductors (${I}_{b,L}$), and diodes (${I}_{b,D}$) in the UW HiPeR-PIT PPU.

**Figure 33.**Example of a functional physics model for an IGBT with circuit elements superimposed (from [116]).

**Table 1.**Summary of operating parameters and test data for various IPPTs. (* data not available, ** equivalent circuit voltage, *** equivalent circuit current, ${}^{+}$ estimated value, ${}^{++}$ not applicable).

Experiment | ${\mathit{I}}_{\mathbf{sp}}$ [s] | ${\mathit{I}}_{\mathbf{bit}}$ [mN-s] | ${\mathit{\eta}}_{\mathbf{t}}$ [%] | ${\mathit{B}}_{\mathbf{pk}}$ [T] | $\u2329\mathit{\beta}\u232a$ | ${\mathit{V}}_{0}$ [kV] | ${\mathit{I}}_{\mathbf{pk}}$ [kA] |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|

PIT MK Va (open flux) [3] | 2000–7000 | 50–120 | 40–55 | 0.55 | ${}^{++}$ | 30–32 ** | 135 *** |

CTP-IPPT (open flux) [4] | 1000–4500 | 0.1–1 | <6 ${}^{+}$ | * | ${}^{++}$ | 5 | 18 |

MSFC-IPPT (open flux) [18] | * | * | * | * | ${}^{++}$ | 3 | 7.4 |

PTX (closed flux) [35] | * | * | * | 0.5 | * | 35 | 50 |

PT-1 (closed flux) [36] | * | * | * | 0.1 | * | 3 | 14 |

1 kW EMPT (closed flux) [47] | * | * | * | 0.03 | ∼0.5 | 1.3 | 1 |

50 J/pulse ELF (closed flux) [51] | * | 0.4 | * | 0.04 | ∼0.5 | 10 | * |

30 kW ELF (closed flux) [58] | * | * | * | 0.01 | ∼0.5 | 3 | 3 |

**Table 2.**Representative circuit parameters for selected IPPTs. (* estimated values, ** value not reported).

Thruster | ${\mathit{C}}_{\mathit{m}\mathit{b}}$ | ${\mathit{L}}_{\mathit{c}}$ | ${\mathit{L}}_{\mathit{s}\mathit{t}\mathit{r}\mathit{a}\mathit{y}}$ | ${\mathit{V}}_{0}$ | ${\mathit{I}}_{\mathit{m}\mathit{a}\mathit{x}}$ | $\mathbf{dV}/\mathbf{dt}$ | $\mathbf{dI}/\mathbf{dt}$ |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|

[$\mathsf{\mu}$F] | [nH] | [nH] | [kV] | [kA] | [kV/$\mathsf{\mu}$s] | [kA/$\mathsf{\mu}$s] | |

PIT MK Va [3,65] | 9 | 680 | 60 | 30 | 135 | 11 | 270 |

FARAD [17,87] | 20 | 810 | 70 | 3.1 | 10* | 1.2 | 45 |

MSFC IPPT [18] | 10 | 705 | 336 | 3 | 7 | 0.7 | 2 |

ELF-160 [88] * | 1.32 | 325 | ** | 3.4 | 7 | 5 | 10 |

**Table 3.**Comparison of characteristics of selected solid-state switch types. Note that the designations in this table are for individual switches and not for arrays containing multiple switches.

Parameter | Thyristor/SCR | IGBT | MOSFET |
---|---|---|---|

Switching Speed | Slowest | Intermediate | Fastest |

Current | Highest | Intermediate | Lowest |

Breakdown Voltage | Highest | Intermediate | Lowest |

Control Type | Current | Voltage | Voltage |

© 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

## Share and Cite

**MDPI and ACS Style**

Polzin, K.; Martin, A.; Little, J.; Promislow, C.; Jorns, B.; Woods, J.
State-of-the-Art and Advancement Paths for Inductive Pulsed Plasma Thrusters. *Aerospace* **2020**, *7*, 105.
https://doi.org/10.3390/aerospace7080105

**AMA Style**

Polzin K, Martin A, Little J, Promislow C, Jorns B, Woods J.
State-of-the-Art and Advancement Paths for Inductive Pulsed Plasma Thrusters. *Aerospace*. 2020; 7(8):105.
https://doi.org/10.3390/aerospace7080105

**Chicago/Turabian Style**

Polzin, Kurt, Adam Martin, Justin Little, Curtis Promislow, Benjamin Jorns, and Joshua Woods.
2020. "State-of-the-Art and Advancement Paths for Inductive Pulsed Plasma Thrusters" *Aerospace* 7, no. 8: 105.
https://doi.org/10.3390/aerospace7080105