Next Article in Journal
Structured Control Design for a Highly Flexible Flutter Demonstrator
Previous Article in Journal
Computational Analysis of Compressed Stiffened Composite Panels with Impact Damage
Article Menu
Issue 3 (March) cover image

Export Article

Open AccessArticle
Aerospace 2019, 6(3), 26; https://doi.org/10.3390/aerospace6030026

Electric VTOL Configurations Comparison

Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Politecnico di Torino, 10129 Turin, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Received: 21 December 2018 / Revised: 13 February 2019 / Accepted: 22 February 2019 / Published: 28 February 2019
  |  
PDF [4177 KB, uploaded 28 February 2019]
  |  

Abstract

In the last ten years, different concepts of electric vertical take-off and landing aircrafts (eVTOLs) have been tested. This article addresses the problem of the choice of the best configuration. VTOLs built since the fifties are presented and their advantages, disadvantages, and problems are discussed. Three representative eVTOLs, one for each main configuration, are compared on five main parameters and three reference missions. The parameters are disk loading, total hover time, cruise speed, practical range, and flight time. The performance of the eVTOLs on the urban, extra-urban, and long-range mission is evaluated computing the time and energy required. The results show that the best configuration depends on the mission. The multirotor is more efficient in hover. The vectored thrust jet is more efficient in cruise and has a higher range. The lift + cruise is a compromise. View Full-Text
Keywords: electric VTOL configurations; VTOL design; aircraft design electric VTOL configurations; VTOL design; aircraft design
Figures

Figure 1

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited (CC BY 4.0).
SciFeed

Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Bacchini, A.; Cestino, E. Electric VTOL Configurations Comparison. Aerospace 2019, 6, 26.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics

1

Comments

[Return to top]
Aerospace EISSN 2226-4310 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top