Next Article in Journal
Evaluation of Sonic Boom Shock Wave Generation with CFD Methods
Previous Article in Journal
Fluid–Structure Interactions between Oblique Shock Trains and Thin-Walled Structures in Isolators
Previous Article in Special Issue
Design and Mechanical Properties of Maximum Bulk Modulus Microstructures Based on a Smooth Topology with Grid Point Density
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Research on the Heat Dissipation in Aviation-Integrated Communication Equipment Based on Graphene Films

1
College of Electronic and Information Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai 201804, China
2
Shanghai Aerospace Electronics Co., Ltd., Shanghai 201821, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Aerospace 2024, 11(6), 483; https://doi.org/10.3390/aerospace11060483
Submission received: 29 March 2024 / Revised: 26 May 2024 / Accepted: 12 June 2024 / Published: 18 June 2024

Abstract

:
Aviation-integrated communication equipment is integral to modern aircraft to ensure its performance and safety. The heat dissipation problems of equipment have become increasingly prominent for the high electronic integration and system power consumption. To solve the above problem, the heat dissipation performance of aviation-integrated communication equipment based on graphene films is deeply studied. This paper establishes a three-dimensional model of aviation-integrated communication equipment to simulate the distribution of temperature fields. The influence between aluminum alloy and graphene films on the surface of magnesium alloy on the heat dissipation performance of aviation-integrated communication equipment is studied. The simulation results show that the heat balance time of the equipment using graphene films on the surface of magnesium alloy is reduced from 3600 s to 800 s, representing an approximately 77.78% improvement; the measured equipment exhibited a reduction in its overall thermal equilibrium temperature, decreasing from 68.1 °C to 66.3 °C, representing an improvement of approximately 2.64%.

1. Introduction

With the development of China’s civil aviation [1] and civil aircraft industry [2] in recent years, avionics equipment [3] has become an essential component of modern aviation, playing a crucial role in the performance and safety of aircraft [4]. To accomplish flight, all the essential independent communication equipment [5] must occupy specific places in the cabin, including short-wave communication, ultra-short-wave communication [6], satellite communication [7], and data link [8], which leads to the overload of cabin equipment space and carrying capacity. Consequently, aviation-integrated communication equipment [9,10] emerged as the times required. The equipment integrates self-organized network communication links [11], 4G/5G public network communication links [12], real-time kinematic (RTK) differential high-precision positioning links [13], BeiDou third-generation short message communication links [14], aviation automatic dependent surveillance-broadcast (ADS-B) communication links [15], integrated control centers, and a power adaptation module. However, high electronic integration, high system power consumption, and prolonged continuous running result in the increasingly severe issue of radiating heat, which is critical to regular operation and lifespan [16]. Thus, conducting efficient heat dissipation research for highly integrated aviation communication equipment is vital.
In 2018 [17], Li J. et al. stabilized graphene layers by intercalating laponite between them; this intercalation method offers an alternative method for the dispersion of graphene layers. In 2019, high-performance polymer composite films with a combination of natural rubber/graphene nanoplatelet (NR/GNPs) composites and NR/boron nitride (NR/BN) composites were fabricated by Feng C.P. et al. and proved to be superior thermal interface material [18]. In 2020, Fan D. et al. proposed a composite foil with a sandwich structure of graphite–silver–polyimide that exhibited high thermal conductivity and reduced the local high temperature of the surface [19]. In 2020, Li W. et al. developed two types of high thermal conductive flexible phase change materials (FPCMs) into film morphology and added the graphene film to enhance transverse heat transfer [20,21]. In 2021, Dongsheng Yang et al. presented a flexible composite material based on nano-efficient cooling methods; the results show that the optimized equipment heat source temperature can be reduced by up to 8.5 °C [22]. In 2021, Yu Chen et al. reported the facile preparation of highly thermally conductive and electrically insulating poly(p-phenylene benzobisoxazole) nanofiber (PBONF) composites by incorporating a low-weight fraction of functionalized boron nitride nanosheets (BNNSs); the 5G equipment and high-power density electronic devices with the nanocomposite paper shows excellent heat dissipation performance [23]. With extraordinary heat dissipation performance, alloy graphene is increasingly popular. In 2018, Le Zhang et al. prepared aluminum/graphene composites with enhanced heat-dissipation properties by the in situ reduction of graphene oxide on aluminum particles; the enhancement of 9.1% in specific heat capacity was achieved with only 0.3% graphene addition into pure Al. In 2022 [24], Hao-liang Li et al. reduced GO/polyimide carbon (rGO/PI-carbon) films were prepared by a one-pot “grafting-welding” strategy and exhibited an increase in the in-plane thermal conductivity of 48.92% compared with the rGO film. In 2023 [25], Shibo Wang et al. adopted the high thermal conductivity graphene paper to directionally transfer the heat produced in the battery to the compact aluminum fin; the maximum temperature of the battery in UAV can be reduced by 34.00%. In 2023 [26], the research on graphene aerogel composite phase change materials indicates that the heat dissipation enhancement of those composite materials can reach 220.8%. In 2024 [27], Yi Shen Lim explored the remarkable enhancement of light-emitting diode (LED) cooling through nucleate boiling using hybrid coatings of graphene-nanoplatelets (GNP) and carbon nanotubes (CNT), which exhibited a maximum temperature drop of 20.7 °C and an enhancement up to 1212%. Nevertheless, research on applying alloy graphene in aviation-integrated communication equipment is still lacking [28].
A three-dimensional model structure is constructed to study the heat-dissipation performance of aviation-integrated communication equipment, and the temperature distribution of the heat-dissipation system is simulated. The influence between aluminum alloy and graphene films on the surface of magnesium alloy on the heat dissipation performance of aviation-integrated communication equipment is studied. This paper aims to compare the heat balance time and overall thermal equilibrium temperature between traditional aluminum alloy material and graphene films on the surface of magnesium alloy material so as to demonstrate the potential for real applications using the new materials.

2. Three-Dimensional Modeling of Aviation-Integrated Communication Equipment

In this section, we present the 3D modeling approach used to analyze the thermal performance of aviation-integrated communication equipment. The detailed composition and mechanical properties of the equipment are discussed to provide a comprehensive understanding of the system.

2.1. Equipment Composition

Aviation-integrated communication equipment comprises self-organized network communication links, 4G/5G public network communication links, RTK differential high-precision positioning links, Beidou third-generation short message communication links, aviation ADS-B broadcast communication links, integrated control centers, and power adaptation parts. The equipment composition is shown in Figure 1.

2.2. Mechanical Property

Considering the structural strength and thermal conduction path of aviation equipment, the aviation-integrated communication equipment adopts a modular structure. The structure is mainly composed of three modules, 0-10, 0-20, and 0-30, which cover the top of the plate and the backplane and are connected by the screw into a whole. The 2D diagram of the mechanical structure is shown in Figure 2, and the 3D modeling is shown in Figure 3. The 0-10 module includes an aviation ADS-B broadcast communication link; the 0-20 module includes an RTK differential high-precision positioning link, integrated control center module, and power adapter module; and the 0-30 module consists of a self-organized network communication link, a 4G/5G public network communication link, and a Beidou third-generation short message communication link.
Shape size: (216.0 ± 1.0) mm × (160.0 ± 1.0) mm × (83.3 ± 1.0) mm;
Equipment power dissipation: 28 V/82.5 V (peak value), 41.5 W (mean value), power dissipation is shown in Table 1.

3. Mathematical Modeling

The mathematical modeling of aviation-integrated communication equipment is crucial to understanding its thermal behavior and optimizing its heat dissipation performance. In this section, we outline the general conditions and parameters necessary for constructing the model.

3.1. Model Condition

Aviation-integrated communication equipment has high electronic integration, light structure weight, and high system power consumption, which requires a long time. The normal working environment modeling parameters of aviation-integrated communication equipment are as follows:
Working mode: prolonged continuous running;
Working situation: initial temperature 25 °C, working temperature range 25~40 °C;
Installation mode: the terminal is installed in contact with the cabin flat, and temperature control of the installation surface is constant at 40 °C;
Heat dissipation mode: convection heart dissipation mainly, radiation heat transfer auxiliary, as is shown in Figure 4;
Surface operation: increasing heat dissipation with black anodization, heat radiation rates = 0.88;
Working heat consumption: the average thermal power consumption of the equipment is 41.5 W.

3.2. Model Parameters

(1)
Aluminum alloy parameters
The structure of aviation-integrated communication equipment is mainly made of aluminum alloy 2A12, with the peculiarities of high strength and stiffness as well as good corrosion resistance, fracture toughness, and anti-fatigue properties [29]; it is one of the most widely used structural materials in the aerospace industry. Silicone thermal conductive pad [30] is provided with merit viscosity, flexibility, compressibility, and thermal conductivity; hence, the heat dissipation effect can be increased after enabling sufficient contact between electronics and the radiating fin with the silicone thermal conductive pad. Fiberglass [31] and plastic capsulation [32] show the benefits of light weight, strength, corrosion resistance, thermal performance, designability, and processability, which have now been widely used in printed circuit board [33] materials. The parameters of aluminum alloy aviation-integrated communication equipment structure material are defined in Table 2.
(2)
Graphene films on the surface of magnesium alloy parameters
Magnesium alloy has the advantages of low density, moderate strength, and an easy process. Magnesium alloys [34] have a particular gap in thermal conductivity compared to aluminum alloys [35]. Thus, it is essential to assist magnesium alloys with superior thermal conductivity materials. The thermal conductivity of graphene is currently the highest among known materials. In 2008, the Balandin research group [36] first measured the thermal conductivity of single-layer graphene using Raman spectroscopy. Observation shows that the highest thermal conductivity of graphene can reach 5300 W/m/K, which is the highest thermal conductivity value of any known material; the study attracts many researchers. Graphene has a certain corrosion resistance, and graphene is corrosion resistant by coating as a protective film on the surface of a magnesium alloy. The study is based on aluminum alloy; a graphene membrane is covered on the surface, thereby reducing the weight and improving the heat dissipation performance of aviation-integrated communication equipment. The main parameters are defined in Table 3.
(3)
Heat source parameters
Table 4 shows the heat source parameters of the primary power devices in aviation-integrated communication equipment; the average total heat consumption is 41.5 W.

3.3. Model Development

(1)
Rationale
According to the laws of physics, the generalized nonlinear heat balance matrix equation is as follows:
[ C ( T ) ] { T } + [ K ( T ) ] { T } = [ Q ( T ) ]
where {T} is the temperature matrix; C is the specific heat matrix; K is the heat conduction matrix; Q is the heat flux load vector. When there is a temperature gradient inside an object, heat will be transferred from the high-temperature to the low-temperature part. When objects of different temperatures come into contact, heat will also be transferred from the high-temperature object to the low-temperature object. This type of heat transfer is called heat conduction. Fourier’s law can describe heat conduction in a general form:
q = Q A = k t = k ( t x i + t y j + t z k )
Thermal convection is the thermal phenomenon in which heat is carried from one part of a fluid to another due to relative motion between different parts of the fluid at different temperatures. Convective heat transfer is described by the Newton cooling formula; the general form is normally described as q = Q / A = h Δ t . In the equation, h is the convective heat transfer coefficient, a physical quantity reflecting the strength of convective heat transfer. Thermal radiation is the process of transmitting energy through electromagnetic waves (or photon flows), and the radiation energy of an object is Q = ε A s σ T 4 . In this formula, ε is emissivity, A s is the surface area, T is the absolute temperature, and σ is the Stephen–Boltzmann constant.
(2)
Simulation Model
Ansys Workbench models the thermal simulation of aviation-integrated communication equipment, and the Ansys(2020) Solver of Mechanical analyzes the structure and thermal. The simulation model adopts a regular tetrahedral mesh method for mesh division and applies encryption processing to a crucial local area grid. The total number of grid elements is 174,000, and the total number of nodes is 414,000. The finite element thermal analysis model is shown in Figure 5.
The thermal simulation model, as shown in Figure 5, demonstrates the detailed 3D structure used for analyzing heat dissipation. The model includes key components and their connections, which are crucial for understanding the thermal behavior of the equipment.

4. Results and Discussion

This section presents the simulation results and provides an in-depth analysis of the heat dissipation performance of the aviation-integrated communication equipment. The discussion focuses on comparing the traditional aluminum alloy and the graphene-enhanced magnesium alloy.

4.1. Aluminum Alloy Simulation Results and Discussion

The initial temperature of the thermal simulation of aviation-integrated communication equipment is set at 25 °C, and the simulation time is set for 90 min. The results of the mild junction temperature of the main components of aluminum alloy aviation-integrated communication equipment are shown in Table 5. The thermal balance temperature of 0-10, 0-20, and 0-30 aluminum alloy aviation-integrated communication equipment is shown in Table 6.
According to the simulation results of Table 5 and Table 6, it is known that the aluminum alloy aviation-integrated communication equipment works continuously for about 3600 s, and the heat equilibrium temperature of the equipment is 68.1 degrees; the heat equilibrium temperature of the 0-10 module is 52.7 degrees; the thermal equilibrium temperature of 0-20 module is 61.4 degrees; the thermal equilibrium temperature of 0-30 module is 55.1 degrees; the maximum temperature of the central heating components in the module is SOC chip, and the maximum thermal equilibrium junction temperature of SOC chip is 87.4 °C. In summary, the mass density of aluminum alloy 2A12 is high, the overall thermal balance time of the equipment is relatively long, some devices have high heat generation, and the temperature conduction effect is not good.

4.2. Magnesium Alloy Simulation Results and Discussion

The initial temperature of the thermal simulation of aviation-integrated communication equipment is set at 25 °C, and the simulation time is set for 90 min. The results of the mild junction temperature of the main components of magnesium alloy aviation-integrated communication equipment are shown in Table 7. The thermal balance temperature of 0-10, 0-20, and 0-30 magnesium alloy aviation-integrated communication equipment is shown in Table 8.
According to the simulation results of Table 7 and Table 8, it is known that the magnesium alloy aviation-integrated communication equipment works continuously for about 5400 s, and the heat equilibrium temperature of the equipment is 67.2 degrees; the heat equilibrium temperature of the 0-10 module is 53.7 degrees, the thermal equilibrium temperature of 0-20 module is 61.6 degrees, the thermal equilibrium temperature of 0-30 module is 56.0 degrees, the maximum temperature of the central heating components in the module is SOC chip, and the maximum thermal equilibrium junction temperature of SOC chip is 85.1 °C. In summary, the mass density of magnesium alloy is low, the overall thermal balance time of the equipment is particularly long, some devices have high heat generation, and the temperature conduction effect is still not good.

4.3. Graphene Films on the Surface of Magnesium Alloy Simulation Results and Discussion

The initial temperature of the thermal simulation of aviation-integrated communication equipment is set at 25 °C, and the simulation time is set for 90 min. The shell temperature and junction temperature results of the main components of graphene films on the surface of magnesium alloy aviation-integrated communication equipment are shown in Table 9, and the thermal balance temperature cloud map of 0-10, 0-20, and 0-30 modules of graphene films on the surface of magnesium alloy aviation-integrated communication equipment is shown in Table 10.
According to the simulation results of Table 9 and Table 10, magnesium alloy + graphene membrane aviation-integrated communication equipment works continuously for about 800 s and gradually tends toward the thermal equilibrium state. The heat balance temperature of the equipment is 66.3 degrees. The thermal balance temperature of the 0-10 module is 45.6 degrees; 0-20 is 48.3 degrees. The thermal balance temperature of the SOC chip with the highest temperature of the central heating device in the module is 70.4 degrees. The thermal balance temperature of the 0-30 module is 45 degrees. In summary, with the magnesium alloy + graphene film as the structural material of the equipment, the weight of aviation-integrated communication equipment is 0.43 kg less than aluminum alloy, reducing the load burden in the cabin. The thermal balance time is decreased from 3600 s to 800 s, with a reduced thermal equilibrium temperature for all single plates and devices, improving the heat dissipation performance of the equipment. Moreover, the requirements for the needed mechanical strength when engineering aviation communication equipment were met, equipment weight was reduced, and the heat dissipation performance of the equipment was improved.

5. Conclusions and Future Work

Graphene is known for having the highest thermal conductivity among most materials. It has promising applications in various fields, including electronic devices, information technology, national defense, and the military industry. This study introduces graphene films on the surface of magnesium alloy in aviation-integrated communication equipment. This material offers significant advantages in terms of structural weight and heat dissipation performance. The succeeding work considers the design for producing a prototype, which aims to bring new materials, such as graphene films on the surface of magnesium alloy, to practical engineering applications. This will improve the overall mechanical performance of comprehensive aviation communication equipment.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, J.Q. and M.L.; methodology, J.Q.; software, Q.Z.; validation, J.Q., S.L. and F.X.; formal analysis, Y.B.; investigation, J.Q. and Q.Z.; data curation, S.L.; writ-ing—original draft preparation, J.Q.; writing—review and editing, J.Q.; visualization, F.X.; supervision, M.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities.

Data Availability Statement

Data are contained within the article.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to express their sincere gratitude to Jinsong Kang and Dongxiu Ou for their exceptional contributions to project administration, resources and funding acquisition. Their invaluable support was instrumental to the successful completion of this research.

Conflicts of Interest

Authors Jingyi Qian, Quan Zhao, Shimiao Luo, Feng Xia and Yunfeng Bai were employed by the company Shanghai Aerospace Electronics Co., Ltd. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

References

  1. Collinson, R.P.G. Introduction to Avionics Systems; Springer Nature: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2023. [Google Scholar]
  2. Todd, D.; Simpson, J. The World Aircraft Industry; Routledge: London, UK, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  3. Avionics: Development and Implementation; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2018.
  4. Wang, Y.; Lei, H.; Hackett, R.; Beeby, M. Safety Assessment Process Optimization for Integrated Modular Avionics. IEEE Aerosp. Electron. Syst. Mag. 2019, 34, 58–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Yu, Q.Y.; Liu, H.; Xu, P.Z.; Li, J.X.; Zhang, L.; Chen, H.H. Next generation wireless avionics intra-communications: Challenges and research topics. IEEE Wirel. Commun. 2022, 30, 87–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Mäurer, N.; Guggemos, T.; Ewert, T.; Gräupl, T.; Schmitt, C.; Grundner-Culemann, S. Security in digital aeronautical communications a comprehensive gap analysis. Int. J. Crit. Infrastruct. Prot. 2022, 38, 100549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Kokkoniemi, J.; Jornet, J.M.; Petrov, V.; Koucheryavy, Y.; Juntti, M. Channel modeling and performance analysis of airplane-satellite terahertz band communications. IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol. 2021, 70, 2047–2061. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Zolanvari, M.; Jain, R.; Salman, T. Potential data link candidates for civilian unmanned aircraft systems: A survey. IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutor. 2019, 22, 292–319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Wang, G.; Zhao, W. The Principles of Integrated Technology in Avionics Systems; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  10. Avtin, I.V.; Baburov, V.I.; Ponomarenko, B.V.; Shatrakov, Y.G. Principles of Integrated Airborne Avionics; Springer: Singapore, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  11. Moysen, J.; Giupponi, L. From 4G to 5G: Self-organized network management meets machine learning. Comput. Commun. 2018, 129, 248–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Guimaraes, C.; Li, X.; Papagianni, C.; Mangues-Bafalluy, J.; Contreras, L.M.; Garcia-Saavedra, A.; Brenes, J.; Cristobal, D.S.; Alonso, J.; Zabala, A.; et al. Public and non-public network integration for 5Growth industry 4.0 use cases. IEEE Commun. Mag. 2021, 59, 108–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Krasuski, K.; Ciećko, A.; Bakuła, M.; Grunwald, G.; Wierzbicki, D. New methodology of designation the precise aircraft position based on the RTK GPS solution. Sensors 2021, 22, 21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Li, G.; Guo, S.; Lv, J.; Zhao, K.; He, Z. Introduction to global short message communication service of BeiDou-3 navigation satellite system. Adv. Space Res. 2021, 67, 1701–1708. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Zhang, X.; Zhang, J.; Wu, S.; Cheng, Q.; Zhu, R. Aircraft monitoring by the fusion of satellite and ground ADS-B data. Acta Astronaut. 2018, 143, 398–405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Lv, Y.-G.; Zhang, G.-P.; Wang, Q.-W.; Chu, W.-X. Thermal Management Technologies Used for High Heat Flux Automobiles and Aircraft: A Review. Energies 2022, 15, 8316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Li, J.; Cui, J.-C.; Yang, Z.-Z.; Qiu, H.-X.; Tang, Z.-H.; Yang, J.-H. Stabilizing graphene layers by intercalating laponite between them. New Carbon Mater. 2018, 33, 19–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Feng, C.P.; Bai, L.; Bao, R.Y.; Wang, S.W.; Liu, Z.; Yang, M.B.; Chen, J.; Yang, W. Superior thermal interface materials for thermal management. Compos. Commun. 2019, 12, 80–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Fan, D.; Jin, M.; Wang, J.; Liu, J.; Li, Q. Enhanced heat dissipation in graphite-silver-polyimide structure for electronic cooling. Appl. Therm. Eng. 2020, 168, 114676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Li, W.; Wang, F.; Cheng, W.; Chen, X.; Zhao, Q. Study of using enhanced heat-transfer flexible phase change material film in thermal management of compact electronic device. Energy Convers. Manag. 2020, 210, 112680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Li, H.-L.; Xiao, S.-N.; Yu, H.-L.; Xue, Y.-H.; Yang, J.-H. A review of graphene-based films for heat dissipation. New Carbon Mater. 2021, 36, 897–908. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Yang, D.; Yao, Q.; Jia, M.; Wang, J.; Zhang, L.; Xu, Y.; Qu, X. Application analysis of efficient heat dissipation of electronic equipment based on flexible nanocomposites. Energy Built Environ. 2020, 2, 157–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Chen, Y.; Zhang, H.; Chen, J.; Guo, Y.; Jiang, P.; Gao, F.; Bao, H.; Huang, X. Thermally conductive but electrically insulating polybenzazole nanofiber/boron nitride nanosheets nanocomposite paper for heat dissipation of 5G base stations and transformers. ACS Nano 2022, 16, 14323–14333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Li, H.; Wu, X.; Cheng, K.; Zhu, M.H.; Wang, L.S.; Yu, H.L.; Yang, J.H. One-pot modified “grafting-welding” preparation of graphene/polyimide carbon films for su-perior thermal management. Carbon 2022, 186, 738. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Wang, S.; Wang, H.; Chang, M.; Xu, J.; Wang, J.; Yang, X.; Bai, J. A novel battery thermal management system for an unmanned aerial vehicle using the graphene directional heat transfer structure. J. Power Sources 2023, 588, 233726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Yang, P.; Wu, B.; Tong, X.; Zeng, M.; Wang, Q.; Cheng, Z. Insight into heat transfer process of graphene aerogel composite phase change material. Energy 2023, 279, 128051. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Lim, Y.S.; Hung, Y.M. Nucleate boiling enhancement on hybrid graphene-nanoplatelets/carbon nanotubes coatings for light-emitting diode cooling. Appl. Therm. Eng. 2024, 2024, 122785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Zhang, L.; Hou, G.; Zhai, W.; Ai, Q.; Feng, J.; Zhang, L.; Si, P.; Ci, L. Aluminum/graphene composites with enhanced heat-dissipation properties by in-situ re-duction of graphene oxide on aluminum particles. J. Alloys Compd. 2018, 748, 854–860. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Zhang, H.; Guo, B.; Zhao, X.; Chen, C. Microstructure and corrosion behavior of 2A12 aluminum alloys by high frequency im-pacting and rooling. CIRP J. Manuf. Sci. Technol. 2023, 41, 328–337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Li, Y.T.; Liu, W.J.; Shen, F.X.; Zhang, G.D.; Gong, L.X.; Zhao, L.; Song, P.; Gao, J.-F.; Tang, L.C. Processing, thermal conductivity and flame retardant properties of silicone rubber filled with different geometries of thermally conductive fillers: A comparative study. Compos. Part B Eng. 2022, 238, 109907. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Yousef, S.; Subadra, S.P.; Griškevičius, P.; Varnagiris, S.; Milcius, D.; Makarevicius, V. Superhydrophilic functionalized graphene/fiberglass/epoxy laminates with high mechanical, impact and thermal performance and treated by plasma. Polym. Test. 2020, 90, 106701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Anene, A.F.; Fredriksen, S.B.; Sætre, K.A.; Tokheim, L.-A. Experimental study of thermal and catalytic pyrolysis of plastic waste components. Sustainability 2018, 10, 3979. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Wu, D.; Cheng, F.; Yang, F.; He, W. Non-destructive testing of carbon-fiber-reinforced plastics with a PCB-based T-R probe. Compos. Struct. 2020, 240, 112080. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Li, S.; Yang, X.; Hou, J.; Du, W. A review on thermal conductivity of magnesium and its alloys. J. Magnes. Alloy. 2020, 8, 78–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Yang, Y.; Xiong, X.; Chen, J.; Peng, X.; Chen, D.; Pan, F. Research advances in magnesium and magnesium alloys worldwide in 2020. J. Magnes. Alloy. 2021, 9, 705–747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Balandin, A.A.; Ghosh, S.; Bao, W.; Calizo, I.; Teweldebrhan, D.; Miao, F.; Lau, C.N. Superior thermal conductivity of single-layer graphene. Nano Lett. 2008, 8, 902–907. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Aviation-integrated communication equipment Composition Diagram.
Figure 1. Aviation-integrated communication equipment Composition Diagram.
Aerospace 11 00483 g001
Figure 2. Aviation-integrated communication equipment Mechanical Structure 2D Drawing.
Figure 2. Aviation-integrated communication equipment Mechanical Structure 2D Drawing.
Aerospace 11 00483 g002
Figure 3. Aviation-integrated communication equipment Mechanical Structure Explosion 3D Drawing.
Figure 3. Aviation-integrated communication equipment Mechanical Structure Explosion 3D Drawing.
Aerospace 11 00483 g003
Figure 4. Aviation-integrated communication equipment Heat Dissipation Path Drawing.
Figure 4. Aviation-integrated communication equipment Heat Dissipation Path Drawing.
Aerospace 11 00483 g004
Figure 5. Aviation-integrated communication equipment thermal simulation model.
Figure 5. Aviation-integrated communication equipment thermal simulation model.
Aerospace 11 00483 g005
Table 1. Aviation-integrated communication equipment Power Dissipation Calculation.
Table 1. Aviation-integrated communication equipment Power Dissipation Calculation.
ModuleStatic Power Dissipation (W)Peak Value Power Dissipation (W)
Self-organizing network communication module2.05.0
4G/5G public network communication module1.05.0
RTK differential high-precision positioning module3.03.0
BeiDou-3 short message communication module2.115.0
Aviation ADS-B broadcast communication module20.133.0
Integrated control module5.05.0
Power efficiency80.00%80.00%
Overall unit power dissipation41.582.5
Table 2. Aluminum alloy aviation-integrated communication equipment structure material parameters.
Table 2. Aluminum alloy aviation-integrated communication equipment structure material parameters.
Name of MaterialSpecific Heat Capacity
(J·(kg·k)−1)
Thermal Conductivity (W·(m·k)−1)Density
(g/cm3)
Aluminum AL-2A129201212.78
Fiberglass Fr4115023.5X direction1.85
0.32Y direction
23.5Z direction
Plastic capsulation85051.9
Silicone thermal conductive pad150041.0
Table 3. Aviation-integrated communication equipment of graphene films on the surface of magnesium alloy structure material parameters.
Table 3. Aviation-integrated communication equipment of graphene films on the surface of magnesium alloy structure material parameters.
Material NameSpecific Heat Capacity
(J·(kg·k)−1)
Thermal Conductivity
(W·(m·k)−1)
Density
(g/cm3)
Magnesium Alloy2451541.73
Glass Fiber Fr4115023.5X direction1.85
0.32Y direction
23.5Z direction
Plastic Packaging85051.9
Graphene Membrane7505000X direction1.05
50Y direction
5000Z direction
Thermal Pad150041.0
Table 4. Heat source parameters of the main power devices in aluminum alloy aviation-integrated communication equipment.
Table 4. Heat source parameters of the main power devices in aluminum alloy aviation-integrated communication equipment.
Component NameThermal Resistance
(°C/W)
Average Heat Consumption (W)Allowable Operating Temperature
(°C)
Quantity
0-10-DCDC/10851
0-10-FPGA/3851
0-10-HT1H/21251
0-10-TPS545275.20.371251
0-20-PAF6.50.11251
0-20-PAR/0.0151251
0-20-CLOCK6.91.51251
0-20-SoC3.46.51251
0-20-DDR36.52.11252
0-20-AD0.61.41251
0-20-DCDC25.711251
0-30-CX6672/51251
0-30-TPS545275.20.671251
0-30-RM500Q/4.51251
0-30-TPS545275.20.51251
0-30-RD05W3035/0.551251
0-30-TPS545275.20.151251
Table 5. Analysis of junction temperature of main components in aluminum alloy aviation-integrated communication equipment.
Table 5. Analysis of junction temperature of main components in aluminum alloy aviation-integrated communication equipment.
Component NameThermal Resistance (°C/W)Average Heat Consumption/WComponent Shell Temperature (°C)Component Junction Temperature (°C)
0-10-DCDC/1043.0/
0-10-FPGA/350.8/
0-10-HT1H/250.2/
0-10-TPS545275.20.3757.259.2
0-20-PAF6.50.154.054.7
0-20-PAR350.01549.950.4
0-20-CLOCK6.91.561.371.7
0-20-SoC3.46.565.387.4
0-20-DDR36.52.159.473.1
0-20-AD0.61.465.966.7
0-20-DCDC7.4156.073.4
0-30-CX6672/553.7/
0-30-TPS545275.20.6768.171.6
0-30-RM500Q/4.557.2/
0-30-TPS545275.20.567.269.8
0-30-RD05W3035/0.5547.6/
0-30-TPS545275.20.1549.250.0
Table 6. Aluminum alloy aviation-integrated communication equipment Module Temperature Cloud Diagrams.
Table 6. Aluminum alloy aviation-integrated communication equipment Module Temperature Cloud Diagrams.
Component NameThermal Equilibrium Temperature/°CTemperature Cloud GraphTemperature Change Curve
0-1052.7Aerospace 11 00483 i001Aerospace 11 00483 i002
0-2061.4Aerospace 11 00483 i003Aerospace 11 00483 i004
0-3055.1Aerospace 11 00483 i005Aerospace 11 00483 i006
Equipment68.1Aerospace 11 00483 i007Aerospace 11 00483 i008
Table 7. Analysis of junction temperature of main components in magnesium alloy aviation-integrated communication equipment.
Table 7. Analysis of junction temperature of main components in magnesium alloy aviation-integrated communication equipment.
Component NameThermal Resistance (°C/W)Average Heat Consumption/WComponent Shell Temperature (°C)Component Junction Temperature (°C)
0-10-DCDC/1042.4/
0-10-FPGA/350.7/
0-10-HT1H/249.8/
0-10-TPS545275.20.3755.357.3
0-20-PAF6.50.153.854.5
0-20-PAR350.01549.850.3
0-20-CLOCK6.91.560.671
0-20-SoC3.46.56385.1
0-20-DDR36.52.158.271.9
0-20-AD0.61.465.366.1
0-20-DCDC7.4154.461.8
0-30-CX6672/552.9/
0-30-TPS545275.20.6766.870.3
0-30-RM500Q/4.546.9/
0-30-TPS545275.20.1548.849.6
0-30-RD05W3035/0.5547.6/
0-30-TPS545275.20.1549.250.0
Table 8. Magnesium alloy aviation-integrated communication equipment Module Temperature Cloud Diagrams.
Table 8. Magnesium alloy aviation-integrated communication equipment Module Temperature Cloud Diagrams.
Component NameThermal Equilibrium Temperature/°CTemperature Cloud GraphTemperature Change Curve
0-1053.7Aerospace 11 00483 i009Aerospace 11 00483 i010
0-2061.6Aerospace 11 00483 i011Aerospace 11 00483 i012
0-3056.0Aerospace 11 00483 i013Aerospace 11 00483 i014
Equipment67.2Aerospace 11 00483 i015Aerospace 11 00483 i016
Table 9. Aviation-integrated communication equipment of graphene films on the surface of magnesium alloy main components analysis junction temperature.
Table 9. Aviation-integrated communication equipment of graphene films on the surface of magnesium alloy main components analysis junction temperature.
Component NameThermal Resistance (°C/W)Average Heat Consumption/WComponent Shell Temperature (°C)Component Junction Temperature (°C)
0-10-DCDC/1040.7/
0-10-FPGA/344.2/
0-10-HT1H/247.9/
0-10-TPS545275.20.3753.955.9
0-20-PAF6.50.145.245.9
0-20-PAR350.01541.942.4
0-20-CLOCK6.91.545.956.3
0-20-SoC3.46.548.370.4
0-20-DDR36.52.150.764.4
0-20-AD0.61.453.654.4
0-20-DCDC7.4150.157.5
0-30-CX6672/546.6/
0-30-TPS545275.20.6766.369.8
0-30-RM500Q/4.547.3/
0-30-TPS545275.20.560.563.1
0-30-RD05W3035/0.5541.3/
0-30-TPS545275.20.1544.144.9
Table 10. Aviation-integrated communication equipment of graphene films on the surface of magnesium alloy temperature cloud diagrams.
Table 10. Aviation-integrated communication equipment of graphene films on the surface of magnesium alloy temperature cloud diagrams.
Component NameThermal Equilibrium Temperature/°CTemperature Cloud GraphTemperature Change Curve
0-1045.6Aerospace 11 00483 i017Aerospace 11 00483 i018
0-2048.3Aerospace 11 00483 i019Aerospace 11 00483 i020
0-3045.0Aerospace 11 00483 i021Aerospace 11 00483 i022
Equipment66.3Aerospace 11 00483 i023Aerospace 11 00483 i024
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Qian, J.; Liu, M.; Zhao, Q.; Luo, S.; Xia, F.; Bai, Y. Research on the Heat Dissipation in Aviation-Integrated Communication Equipment Based on Graphene Films. Aerospace 2024, 11, 483. https://doi.org/10.3390/aerospace11060483

AMA Style

Qian J, Liu M, Zhao Q, Luo S, Xia F, Bai Y. Research on the Heat Dissipation in Aviation-Integrated Communication Equipment Based on Graphene Films. Aerospace. 2024; 11(6):483. https://doi.org/10.3390/aerospace11060483

Chicago/Turabian Style

Qian, Jingyi, Min Liu, Quan Zhao, Shimiao Luo, Feng Xia, and Yunfeng Bai. 2024. "Research on the Heat Dissipation in Aviation-Integrated Communication Equipment Based on Graphene Films" Aerospace 11, no. 6: 483. https://doi.org/10.3390/aerospace11060483

APA Style

Qian, J., Liu, M., Zhao, Q., Luo, S., Xia, F., & Bai, Y. (2024). Research on the Heat Dissipation in Aviation-Integrated Communication Equipment Based on Graphene Films. Aerospace, 11(6), 483. https://doi.org/10.3390/aerospace11060483

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop