Next Article in Journal
A Framework for Aircraft Conceptual Design and Multidisciplinary Optimization
Previous Article in Journal
Multi-Electric Aero Engine Control and Hardware-in-the-Loop Verification with Starter Generator Coordination
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Design and Experimental Study of a Drilling Tool for Mars Rock Sampling

1
Institute of Spacecraft System Engineering, Beijing 100094, China
2
School of Civil Aviation, Northwestern Polytechnical University, Xi’an 710072, China
3
School of Light Industry, Harbin University of Commerce, Harbin 150028, China
4
State Key Laboratory of Robotics and Systems, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin 150028, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Aerospace 2024, 11(4), 272; https://doi.org/10.3390/aerospace11040272
Submission received: 26 December 2023 / Revised: 17 March 2024 / Accepted: 25 March 2024 / Published: 30 March 2024

Abstract

:
Martian rocks contain crucial information about the genesis of Mars and the historical evolution of Martian climate change. Consequently, extracting and examining Martian rocks are pivotal in advancing our comprehensive understanding of the red planet. However, the current core drill string is prone to wear and tear, and the samples are susceptible to thermal denaturation. To address these challenges, we introduce two novel types of drill bits, the conical straight junk slot and the conical spiral junk slot, both employing impregnated diamond as the primary material. Comparative experiments were meticulously conducted to evaluate the influence of different junk configurations on drilling parameters, including speed, abrasion resistance, drilling force loading, and sample temperature rise. The findings unequivocally demonstrate the superior performance of the spiral junk slot. Furthermore, simulations were performed to examine the drilling process on basalt using a fixed configuration drill bit, validating the occurrence of the sample temperature rise. The research presented in this paper offers valuable programmatic references and essential data support for future Martian rock coring drilling missions.

1. Introduction

Martian soil and rocks play a crucial role as reservoirs of significant scientific information, providing essential insights for humanity to unravel the solar system’s mysteries and identify potential signs of life on Mars [1,2]. However, due to the challenges posed by space radiation and inhospitable conditions for microorganisms on the Martian surface, this study focuses on the durable Martian rocks beneath the regolith. These rocks are selected as the primary research subjects. The primary method employed for studying Martian rocks is the drilling core sampling technique, which emerges as a paramount approach for precisely understanding their properties. This method stands out as one of the most direct and effective means for gaining insights into the characteristics of Martian rocks [3,4,5].
In 2003, Courage utilized tungsten carbide, along with four magnets of varying strengths, to develop the rock abrasion device integrated into this apparatus [6]. In 2007, the Rover sampling rig employed tungsten carbide and surface diamond as the drill bit, coupled with a hollow stem configuration. Subsequently [7], in 2011, Curiosity utilized a tungsten carbide drill bit for sample grinding and an auger stem for sample extraction [8]. Finally, in 2022, Mole employed tungsten carbide in designing the hammered inline tube sampling device for sample collection [9,10]. However, when faced with the dense basalt on Mars [11], all missions encountered consistent drilling difficulties and significant issues related to wear and tear.
In 2021, NASA initiated the Perseverance Mars rover mission, incorporating a tungsten carbide drill bit specifically tailored for Martian rock. Unfortunately, the initial drilling operation with Perseverance revealed considerable wear and tear on the drilling string. This poses a substantial challenge, particularly given the complexity of replacing the drilling string for multiple, multi-point samplings of the Martian rock profile [12]. This underscores the crucial need for drilling string with prolonged durability, high wear resistance, and self-sharpening capabilities to ensure the reliability of the drilling process. In 2012, the University of Kentucky developed the PCD compact core drilling rig, as illustrated in Figure 1, which utilized cemented carbide with impregnated diamonds as the drill bit. This configuration included four impregnated diamonds and four reaming grinding tools. Experimental measurements of the wear amount were conducted, verifying the configuration’s effectiveness in reducing wear [13]. The findings of the study offer valuable insights for the design of the drill bit configuration proposed in this paper.
Moreover, given the substantial presence of life-related information and water ice material in Martian rocks, the effective mitigation of sample denaturation, resulting from frictional heat generation during the drilling process, has become a challenging aspect of the sample collection process. In the past, both Phoenix and Perseverance utilized insulating materials to isolate the samples [14,15,16], whereas Courage and Curiosity lacked insulation [17,18]. The Drilling Integration Package for Scientific Drilling (DIBS) developed by Galileo Avionica [19,20] and the Mars Astrobiology Research and Technology Experiment (MARTE) drilling system developed by Honeybee Robotics Inc. [21,22,23] enable samples to be directly transported to subsystems for in situ analysis, capturing the most realistic characteristics of the samples. However, this approach still does not fully address the issue of heat exposure during the drilling process.
We know from the above that, in recent years, compared to other star soil-drilling tools, previous drill bits have predominantly been composed of cemented carbide materials and utilized cutting methods for drilling. However, their thin and brittle cutting edges make them prone to chipping when drilling hard rocks, thus reducing the drill bit’s lifespan. Moreover, these drill bits have small heat dissipation areas and suboptimal thermal conductivity. In contrast, the designed impregnated diamond drill bit exhibits excellent self-sharpness and is resistant to chipping. Utilizing grinding for drilling, it boasts a larger heat dissipation area and superior material thermal conductivity.
In this paper, we propose the design of a sampling drill bit based on impregnated diamond. The aim is to mitigate the sample’s temperature rise by enhancing the drill bit’s configuration and optimizing the drilling process. This is achieved by efficiently directing frictional heat from the drill hole through the designed junk slot. The design also focuses on enhancing the self-sharpening capability and stabilizing performance during prolonged operations. This study extensively analyzes the rise in drilling efficiency, drilling force load, drill wear resistance, and sample temperature in various drilling conditions using the designed impregnated diamond drill bit for sampling Martian rocks. The study comprehensively examines drilling efficiency, force load, bit wear resistance, and sample temperature rise across diverse drilling scenarios.

2. Mars Sampling Bit Performance Requirements

(1)
Self-sharpening requirements
As unmanned autonomous sampling is used, the drill bit of the drilling string is challenging to replace or repair when it is worn out. Therefore, the drill bit must exhibit self-sharpening performance to ensure efficient and stable sampling while maintaining the capability to conduct drilling steadily and in optimal conditions.
(2)
Wear resistance requirements
Curiosity’s drill bit demonstrated the capability to penetrate dense basalt; however, it experienced significant wear, leading to a shortened bit life. Consequently, the drill was limited to drilling softer materials like limestone to ensure optimal drilling string performance, and the residual metal shavings from the drill bit can introduce errors in the detection results. To address these challenges, specific requirements are proposed for the material selection of the drill bit, emphasizing abrasion resistance. The design configuration must also meet the demand to minimize frictional heat generation and avoid leaving detectable residues.
(3)
Temperature rise requirements
In the process of drilling samples, although dry drilling samples could prevent the samples from being contaminated, the drilling platform in the planet’s depth would make it difficult for the heat to be dispersed. This difficulty may compromise the abrasion resistance of the drilling string and, more critically, lead to sample denaturation, undermining its scientific value [24]. Notably, Perseverance experienced significant heat generation during drilling, exceeding 500 °C. Therefore, using high-quality heat-resistant materials is imperative, and the drill bit configuration should be meticulously designed to minimize temperature rise as much as possible.
(4)
Drilling performance requirements
The distribution of rocks on the surface of Mars exhibits high randomness. Through the examination of fundamental parameters such as Martian rock’s hardness, shear resistance, and compression resistance [25,26,27,28,29,30], the target characteristic parameters of Martian rocks are summarized in Table 1. Core drilling string necessitates high hardness and efficient junk slots to address the complexities of drilling conditions effectively. Curiosity incorporated the percussion method in its drilling mechanism to augment the impact force, aiding the drilling process, even in challenging situations where extraction might be problematic. Hence, ensuring optimal drilling efficiency and capacity is of paramount importance.

3. Design of Impregnated Diamond Martian Rock Sampling Drilling

3.1. Design Overview

Following the principles and laws of drilling tool design, various combinations of drill base and chipformer configurations have been devised, resulting in four preliminary configurations: inner taper straight chipformer, arc spiral chipformer, tapered straight chipformer, and tapered spiral chipformer. Considering factors such as drilling efficiency, temperature rise rate, centering performance, chipformer, and machining feasibility, the tapered straight chipformer and tapered spiral chipformer are identified as the most suitable options. Thus, the tapered straight chipformer and tapered spiral chipformer configurations are adopted as the final configurations for drilling operations.
This paper introduces two design schemes for the drilling bit: the conical straight junk slot and the conical spiral junk slot, as illustrated in Figure 2. Its key parameters and structure schematic drawing are detailed in Table 2. The functions of each part are described as follows:
(1)
Chip guide surface: This surface is employed to expel the cuttings and dissipate the heat generated while drilling Martian rocks along the drill pipe through the cuttings junk slot. This ensures optimal drilling performance for the string.
(2)
Diamond matrix: This component embeds diamond abrasive grains. The matrix undergoes constant wear and tear to expose new diamond grains, thereby achieving self-sharpening and maintaining stable cutting performance for the drilling string.
(3)
Grinding edge: By increasing the vertical force, the diamond grains undergo extrusion fracture against the drilled object. The resulting material debris is then discharged along the junk slot, achieving the purpose of grinding.
(4)
Blank: This part supports the diamond matrix and contributes vertical force to the linear cutting edge.
The two configurations are described in detail as follows:
(1)
Conical straight junk slot drills
The conical straight junk slot drill comprises a conical base and four inlays spaced at 90° intervals. Notably, the conical blank configuration facilitates drilling centering. The linear cutting edge is tasked with grinding into the Martian rocks and rock objects at the hole’s bottom, inducing shear failure. Meanwhile, the reaming edge is responsible for the secondary grinding of the hole wall. The combination of the chip guide surface and the conical surface of the blank forms a cuttings channel, facilitating the transfer of the cuttings to the back end of the drill pipe’s spiral groove. The helical feed principle is further employed to transport abrasive cuttings outside the drill hole.
(2)
Conical spiral junk slot drills
The conical continuous spiral edge drill comprises a conical blank and four sets of diamond matrix with four slices distributed at 90°. The four sets of curved cutting edges function to grind Martian rocks simultaneously, and the cutting principle closely resembles that of the straight junk slot drill.

3.2. Design of Impregnated Diamond Grinding Tools

3.2.1. Conception of Diamonds and Selection of Matrix

The task target of this drilling string is a hard and strongly abrasive rock formation; in order to meet the design requirements of the drill bit, the diamond should have self-sharpening properties, hardness, and impact resistance, and the matrix should have high abrasion resistance, high flexural strength, and good impact resistance. Therefore, we chose the size of 0.5 mm–0.7 mm, a concentration of 100%, the strength of 18,000–22,000 kgf/cm2 high-quality artificial diamond, and 210 HV hardness; in addition, a good heat-resistant copper–nickel alloy was chosen as the drilling string matrix material.

3.2.2. Selection of the Amount and Distribution of Diamond Inserted Edges

(1)
Blades
The effect of exit height on drilling performance can be expressed by the following equation:
V = a h + b
where V is the mechanical drilling speed (m/h), h is the diamond exit height (μm), a and b are the hyper-parameters.
The diameter of diamond grains in impregnated diamond bits typically ranges from 0.1 mm to 0.5 mm. The protruding amount of diamond from the impregnated diamond bits is restricted to 10% of the grain diameter for hard rock. Furthermore, the compression depth into the rock is limited to less than 2/3 of the protruding edge amount, which is greater than 0.02 mm.
(2)
Distributions
Assuming that the diamond particles are spherical with a diameter of d (mm), the number of diamond particles in the 1 cm3 working layer is as follows:
N = 1500 c π d 3
where N is the number of diamond particles in the 1 cm3 working layer (pcs), c is the diamond concentration (400% system), d is the average diameter of diamond (mm) [31].
Calculation gives N = 81,870 pcs.
(3)
Rock-breaking efficiency
In the case of hard and weakly abrasive strata, the rock powder produced is fine, resulting in minimal abrasion of the diamond bit. Therefore, while maintaining a specified amount of cutting edge, employing a larger grain size of diamond can enhance the cutting force exerted on the strata. This allows the diamond to penetrate the rock layer more effectively, reducing the risk of profiling and improving rock-breaking efficiency.
The rock-breaking efficiency is derived by calculating the volume of diamond participating in the cutting on the 1 cm2 profile face as follows:
V c u t = 0.45 k d 10 V = 0.82 c 3.52 · 1000 · 0.45 k d 10 = 11.25 k d
where Vcut is 1 cm2 volume of the diamond participating in cutting on the profile surface (mm3); V is 1 cm3 volume of the diamond contained in the matrix (mm3); c is the diamond concentration (400% system); k is the diamond out coefficient.
The calculation gives Vcut ≈ 0.57 mm3.
(4)
Abrasive grain arrangement
The diamond grains are organized in an equidistant arrangement, as illustrated in Figure 3. This configuration ensures the smooth self-sharpening of the edge, reduces the cost of raw materials, and enhances the lifespan and efficiency of the string. The diamond’s average particle size is 0.18 mm, and the longitudinal spacing between the upper and lower two layers of the diamond is set at 0.22 mm, with a matrix layer thickness of 0.04 mm between the two diamond layers.
In summary, the parameters related to the impregnated inserts are shown in Table 3.

3.3. Design of Drill Base Conical Angle and Chip Removal Groove

3.3.1. Design of Drill Structure and Junk Slot Configuration

Drilling on Earth, the cuttings could be effectively removed, minimizing temperature rise by employing drilling fluid. However, when conducting sampling on Mars, the dry drilling method is employed. Firstly, to avoid contaminating the Martian environment; secondly, the presence of external liquids is not permissible due to the stringent conditions of outer space. In the dry drilling method, the cuttings are discharged outside the drilling hole through the chip removal groove in conjunction with the drilling gauge, creating space for the drill teeth of the drilling string. The cuttings serve the dual purpose of providing room for the drill teeth and carrying away the heat generated during drilling.
Considering the characteristics of the target drilling object, the internal conical angle configuration of the junk slot has the potential to direct the cuttings and rock particles toward the core, thereby impacting the drilling process. Conversely, insufficient junk slots may compromise drilling efficiency and increase drilling resistance. On the other hand, an excessive number of junk slots can elevate the overall temperature of the drill bit during drilling. Given these considerations, a balanced approach is adopted by selecting four straight and spiral junk slots.
Based on the research conducted by Zhang Weiwei [32] at Harbin Institute of Technology, Figure 4 illustrates that an increased spiral lift angle correlates with more excellent drilling resistance. Conversely, a tiny lift angle can result in a thin chip edge, making it susceptible to chipping. To strike a balance and align with the requirements of the machining process, a spiral lift angle of 60° is chosen in the design.
When selecting the drill bit blank, the conical drill bit is favored as it sacrifices bit size to enhance the vertical turning structure of the cuttings channel on the planar blank drill bit. This choice aligns more closely with the hydrodynamic requirements of chip flow, entails lower structural complexity, and is supported by prior simulations of Zhang Weiwei’s planar and conical drills. Notably, the simulations reveal the suboptimal cuttings evacuation effect of planar drills. Considering cuttings removal efficacy and overall drilling performance, a conical blank is chosen for the drill bit. ESA’s Exomars series has successfully employed a shallow conical blank with a linear cuttings removal wing structure, demonstrating commendable drilling performance.

3.3.2. Drill Bit Conical Angle and Matrix Design

(1)
Conical angle design
Analyzing the drill bit’s top angle size based on the rock hardness, considering that the predominant rock type is dense basalt, with main components including feldspar, pyroxene, and olivine. The hardness of these constituent basaltic rocks ranges from 5 to 7, slightly higher than the common steel used in testing with a hardness of 5 to 6. As the hardness of the drill bit decreases, a larger top angle is recommended. Therefore, the top angle is selected within the range of 125° to 130°. A smaller top angle results in increased radial force on the drill bit, potentially causing the dislocation and fracture of the diamond matrix in the impregnated diamond bit under this force. To maintain stability while accommodating the hardness considerations, a top angle of 130° was chosen.
(2)
Matrix design
At the same time, in order to prevent the formation of rock ridges during drilling and to ensure drilling efficiency, the diamond abrasive grains are arranged equidistantly, and the longitudinal spacing between the upper and lower two layers of the diamond should be 0.22 mm (the average grain size of the diamond is 0.18 mm), and the thickness of the matrix layer between the two layers of the diamond is 0.04 mm.
The cuttings removal process from the drill bit can be categorized into two methods for grinding the drill-grinding block on the drilling sample, as illustrated in Figure 5.
Where φ is the anterior angle of the matrix; α is the tire-grinding angle; γ is the posterior angle of the matrix.
The research conducted by Ding Yanhao [33] from Harbin Institute of Technology indicates that the load on the drill bit diminishes with an increasing back angle of the matrix. However, beyond a matrix rear angle exceeding 12°, the reduction in the drill bit load becomes less pronounced. Furthermore, decreasing the matrix rear angle tends to compromise the strength of the cutting edge, leading to damage forms such as crushing and wear. Consequently, guided by the outcomes of single-junk slot cutting tests documented in the literature, the matrix back angle was designated to be 17°.

3.3.3. Design of the Height of the Cutting Edge in Each Direction of the Drill Bit

Figure 6 illustrates the schematic diagram of the height of the bottom exit edge (w1) and the height of the exit edge (w2), where v represents the feed speed, n denotes the rotational speed, w1 is the length of the bottom exit edge, and w2 is the height of the exit edge. During the actual drilling process, the front surface of the grinding edge accumulates debris from Martian rocks, accompanied by the volume expansion of Martian rock cuttings. Taking into account the Martian rock expansion coefficient (Kp), the number of grinding edge inlays (N), and the median particle size of Martian rocks particles (Dp), it is crucial that the height of the bottom exit edge surpasses the single-edged depth of the cut (ht). Additionally, the height of the exit edge for Martian rock particles should be three to five times the median particle size. The following formula can express this requirement:
w 1 > h t = v n N . K p
w 2 = ( 3 ~ 5 ) · D p
Considering challenging working conditions characterized by low rotational speed and high feed rate, taking the rotational speed n = 50 r/min, feed rate v = 300 mm/min, expansion coefficient Kp = 1.4, the median particle size of the Martian rock particles Dp = 0.5 mm, and the number of grinding block inlays N = 3, the calculation for the bottom exit edge height w1 and exit edge height w2 can be determined within a given range. This calculation considers the following equation:
w 1 > h t = V n N · k p = 300 3.5 · 1.4 = 3   mm
w 2 = ( 3 ~ 5 ) · D p = 1.5 ~ 2.5   mm
The final preferred bottom out edge height w1 is 3 mm and the outer edge height w2 is 2 mm.
In the process of drilling, the biggest influence on the drill bit is the size of the drilling particle for the edge height < r < base radius of the drill bit. Hence, the critical particle size range is 3 mm to 16 mm. Since the drilling of rocks generates larger debris, mainly falling within the particle size range of 1 mm to 5 mm, and these debris particles introduce significant resistance to the diamond drill bit during the grinding process, increasing the bottom exit edge height is imperative. By choosing a height coefficient for the exit edge of 2, the calculated height of the bottom exit edge becomes 6 mm.

4. Drilling Force Load and Performance Test Study

4.1. Experimental Design

This test was conducted using a mini drilling and milling machine, and the physical diagram along with the schematic diagram of the test system is presented in Figure 7. The three-jaw chuck of the mini drilling and milling machine securely held the impregnated diamond drill bit, while the vise clamped the drilling object. The weight on the bit was adjusted by adding a counterweight to the drill body. The rotational speed was controlled by rotating the speed-adjusting knob, and the temperature that rose at the drilling point was monitored using a K-type thermocouple. The parameters of the test system are detailed in Table 4.
The test system counterweights were arranged in a tabular form on the upper support frame to adjust the weight precisely and quantitatively. The construction and mounting of the counterweights are illustrated in Figure 8. The weights of the counterweights are 10 kg, 5 kg, 2.5 kg, and 1.4 kg, respectively.
The specifications and parameters of the K-type thermocouple temperature measurement instrument are detailed in Table 5 below. The overall temperature probe is constructed with a combination of glass compilation fiber and an external steel protective shell. This design ensures strong waterproof and dustproof capabilities, making it suitable for use in various environments. Additionally, the probe offers a wide temperature range and can accurately measure temperatures in extremely harsh conditions.

4.2. Pilot Program

We conducted decoupling tests to accurately compare and assess the impregnated diamond bit’s drilling efficiency. These tests aimed to determine the influence of each condition and variable on the drilling effect by varying drilling parameters, drilling objects, and bit configuration. The detailed test program is outlined in Table 6, with one test carried out according to the following scheme for the two types of drilling bits: straight junk slot and spiral junk slot.

4.3. Physical Drill and Test Object

(1)
Physical drill bits
Figure 9 shows the impregnated diamond drill bit in kind; its matrix material is 42CrMo, which has high strength and good toughness. The matrix design was inspired by the impregnated diamond drilling string, featuring a primary component of the copper–nickel alloy. This alloy effectively withstands the impact of drilling into the rock and manages the temperature rise. The matrix incorporates inlaid diamond grains bonded within. As the drill bit grinds the rock, the copper–nickel alloy gradually wears down, exposing inlaid diamond grains on the surface. This creates a micro-cutting edge for rock grinding, constantly revealing new diamond grains and achieving self-sharpening. The matrix and base are welded using silver soldering, providing high joint strength, corrosion resistance, and preventing the matrix from detaching under high-temperature conditions.
(2)
Test subjects
In order to safeguard the drill bit from potential damage due to direct drilling into basalt, we initially conducted tests using marble as the drilling object. Marble, being lower in strength and hardness compared to basalt, served as a suitable material for the preliminary investigation of the drilling performance of the drill bit configured with both straight junk slot and spiral junk slot designs. The physical objects of marble and basalt are depicted in Figure 10.
The comparison of the parameters of marble and basalt is shown in Table 7.

4.4. Tests and Analysis of Results

4.4.1. Drilling Speed Analysis

This test aims to compare the drilling speed of two configurations, straight row and spiral row drilling bits, under varying rotary speeds, and to assess the drilling capacity of both types. Marble was chosen as the testing material, and the drilling depth was measured at 5 s intervals to determine the drilling speed. The test blank is outlined in Table 8, and each type of drill bit was tested once according to the specified parameters.
Drilling data from both configurations are analyzed in Figure 11. The image indicates that, at a drilling speed of 800 rpm, the spiral drill bit achieves a depth of 26.8 mm after 20 min, surpassing the straight drill bit’s depth of 10.2 mm. When the drilling speed is 1200 rpm, the maximum drilling depth of the spiral drill bit is 34.6 mm, whereas the straight drill bit reaches 28 mm. This illustrates that the spiral junk slot drill bit exhibits significantly higher efficiency and drilling capacity under the same drilling conditions than the straight drill bit. Similarly, the auger-type bit outperforms the straight-type bit under identical drilling conditions in both drilling efficiency and capacity.

4.4.2. Wear Resistance Analysis of Drill Bits

The test aims to compare the effects of different rotary speeds and weights on bits of bit wear when drilling to the same depth. Basalt served as the test drilling object, and the measurements of cutting-edge height values before and after drilling 40 mm were taken using vernier profilers. This allowed assessment of drill bit wear before and after each drilling session. The test blank is outlined in Table 9, with each type of drill bit undergoing testing as per the specified conditions.
Figure 12 illustrates that for the straight junk slot drill bit, the drill faces difficulty achieving successful drilling at low rotational speeds and weight on bits. Consequently, the vernier profiler finds it challenging to measure the wear amount of the drill, resulting in negligible wear. As pressure and rotational speed increase, the wear amount of the drill gradually rises. When maintaining a constant weight on the bit and increasing rotary speed from 600 rpm to 2000 rpm, the wear amount needed for drilling a depth of 40 mm changes from 0 mm to 0.1 mm. Similarly, when the rotational speed remains constant and the weight on the bit is increased from 150 N to 1000 N, the wear amount of the drill bit changes from 0 mm to 0.04 mm. Therefore, it is evident that the rotational speed variable has the most significant influence on the wear amount of the drill bit.
After concluding the drilling speed test, the drilling conditions encountered by both the spiral and straight bits were identical. The macroscopic wear patterns of the two bits were then compared, as depicted in Figure 13. It was evident that after several sets of drilling tests, the CuNi alloy matrix experienced gradual wear, exposing the diamond grain to the surface, marked by numerous scratches. Additionally, serrations were observed at the edges of the inlaid.
As the measured height of the cutting edge of the spiral row of drill bits was smaller than that of the straight row of drill bits and the amount of wear was slightly smaller, in order to have a clearer understanding of the wear of the spiral row of drill bits, the surface of the impregnated insert of the drill bit after the completion of the drilling was characterized microscopically through a 4K electron microscope, and the pictures are shown in Figure 13. The CuNi alloy matrix has a large amount of wear, and a large number of diamond grains are exposed on the surface of the impregnated block. In Figure 14a, it is evident that, following the completion of the drilling, the impregnated diamond grains generate a distinct profile on the matrix surface. Additionally, Figure 14b reveals the presence of transverse scratches left by the diamond grains at the terminus of each diamond block. Moreover, the notching observed in Figure 14b is attributed to the accumulation of notches along the edges of the inlay blocks, stemming from both the dislodgement of diamond grits and matrix wear.

4.4.3. Drilling Force Load Analysis

After the rate analysis and wear resistance analysis test, it can be seen that the spiral junk slot drilling performance is better than that of the straight junk slot drill, so the next test should mainly focus on the spiral junk slot drill.
The purpose of the test is to compare the drilling depths of the spiral configuration drill bit at the same time under different bit weights, and to investigate how the weight on the bit impacts drilling capacity. The drilling object was basalt, under the condition of 600 rpm rotary speed. The change of drilling depth at the same drilling time was determined by changing the weight on the bit condition; there were three durations of 5 min, 10 min and 15 min with WOB of 150 N, 250 N, 350 N, 450 N, 1000 N.
At the end of the test, when the drilling time was 15 min, the test picture is shown in Figure 15.
It is evident from the test images that maintaining constant drilling time and rotational speed while increasing the weight on bit results in a noticeable increase in drilling depth. The drilling depths recorded at different time points are plotted in Figure 16. The highest drilling speed is observed at a weight on bit of 1000 N, achieving a drilling depth of 18.6 mm in 15 min, while the lowest drilling efficiency is under a weight on bit of 150 N, resulting in a drilling depth of 5 mm in the same duration. When the weight on bit is 150 N–450 N, the bit basically has no weight on bit, so the weight on bit should be given to more than 1000 N when it is used in practice to ensure the drilling capacity of the auger drill bit.

4.4.4. Sample Temperature Rise Analysis

The atmosphere of Mars is markedly thin, primarily composed of carbon dioxide and other gases, with water vapor content merely one-thousandth that of Earth’s atmosphere. Atmospheric pressure on Mars is a mere 1/150 of that on Earth, akin to a pure vacuum environment. This vacuum condition, coupled with rapid temperature fluctuations, subjects structures to significant thermal stress, leading to mechanical damage in a relatively short timeframe [34]. This paper conducted temperature rise tests under Earth’s atmospheric conditions, limited by test conditions, to explore the temperature trends of spiral drill bits at varying drill speeds and pressures, offering insights for future research.
This test aims to compare the temperature rise of the spiral junk slot bit under different rotary speeds and weights on bits and investigate the temperature rise characteristics of the spiral junk slot bit. Basalt was the drilling object, the ambient temperature was 22 °C, and the temperature was measured using K-type thermocouples. Following each 40 mm drilling, the drill was swiftly raised, and the temperature sensor probe was inserted into the center of the drill bit to measure the temperature rise at the drilling point. The recorded temperature of the drill bit is presented in Figure 17. The test drilling protocol matrix is detailed in Table 10.
The drilling temperature rise data of the drill bit under different drilling conditions varies, as illustrated in Figure 18. As shown in Figure 18a, under a 150 N weight on bit, the drilling temperature rises with the rise in drilling speed, reaching the highest temperature rise of 110.6 °C at a drilling speed of 2000 rpm. In Figure 18b, the drilling temperature rise is observed to increase with the rise in weight on bit, while other drilling conditions remain constant. The maximum temperature rise is recorded when the weight on bit is 1000 N, reaching 290.9 °C.

4.5. Conclusion of the Experiment

(1)
Under identical drilling conditions, the spiral junk slot drill bit exhibits superior drilling capacity, a higher drilling speed, and improved bit-centering performance compared to the straight-type drill bit.
(2)
As the rotary speed and weight on the bit increase, the wear of the drill bit increases, and the drilling capacity is better. When the weight on the bit is constant, the higher the rotary speed, the more complete the coring, and the lower the core loss rate.

5. Simulation Analysis of Heat Generation during Drilling

To model the temperature elevation of the drill bit throughout the drilling operation, finite element simulation software was employed to simulate the temperature increase of both the sample and the drilling string during the drilling stage. The computation of the power generated by the drill bit during the drilling process was conducted by the equation presented below:
P = 2 π n K I 60
where P is the power (W), n is the rotary speed (rpm), K is the correction factor (dimensionless), I is the flow rate (m3/s).
Here, the correction factor of the motor is assumed to be 0.28, with a motor current of 2.3 A. At a rotary speed of 2000 rpm, considering energy conversion losses during the drilling process, typically set at 10%, the estimated power on the drill bit is approximately 121.4 W. During the simulation process, it was assumed that this portion of the energy was entirely transformed into heat at the front end of the drill bit.
Figure 19 illustrates a thermal map showing the temperature distribution around the drill bit; the ambient temperature is 22 °C, and the map focuses on the basalt after 20 min of drilling. The visualization reveals a distinct thermally affected zone within the sample during drilling. Notably, the central portion of the sample in direct contact with the drill bit exhibits the most pronounced temperature perturbation. Furthermore, the overall temperature of the drill bit increases, with the most significant rise occurring at the drill edge, reaching up to 327 °C.
By adding a probe to the front part of the drill bit, in direct contact with the sample, the arrangement is similar to what is shown in Figure 20.
Figure 20 illustrates a clear trend of increasing the temperature of the drill bit over time during the drilling process. After 20 min, the temperature peaks at 327 °C and is expected to further rise with continued drilling. This observation underscores the substantial heat generation and temperature rise of the sample, providing valuable insights into its heat generation characteristics. Such findings are pivotal for enhancing control over drilling temperature in future studies.

6. Conclusions

In this study, two types of impregnated diamond drill bits were specifically designed to address the prevalent issue of significant wear in Mars rock coring drill bits and the susceptibility of samples to heat denaturation. The tests were structured to analyze the drilling speed, abrasion resistance, drilling force under load, and temperature rise of the samples. The goal was to comprehensively investigate the drilling efficiency and feasibility of Mars rock sampling. The following conclusions were drawn:
(1)
By analyzing the basic mechanical properties of Martian rocks, conical straight junk slot- and spiral junk slot-impregnated diamond drill bits were designed, both using a 130° drill base conical angle with a 17° back angle of the grinding edge. The difference between the two configurations is the front angle of the grinding edge and the height of the cutting edge.
(2)
Through the comparison test, it can be seen that when the rotational speed is 800 rpm and the drilling time is 20 min, the spiral drill bit is 16.6 mm deeper than the straight drill bit, and the spiral drill bit performs better than the straight drill bit in terms of drilling rate.
(3)
An obvious increase in wear is observed with higher drilling pressure and increased bit speed, with the spiral drill bits exhibiting less wear compared to the straight drill bits.
(4)
With an increase in drilling pressure, the drilling performance of the drill bit significantly improves. Below 450 N, the drill bit exhibits minimal drilling ability, with the maximum drilling ability observed under the test conditions of 1000 N in this study.
(5)
When other drilling conditions remain unchanged, the drilling temperature rise increases with the increase in drilling pressure. Under the test conditions in this study, the drilling temperature rise reaches a maximum of 290.9 °C at a drilling pressure of 1000 N.
Compared to previous Mars drilling tools, inlaid diamond bits exhibit excellent self-sharpening properties. This is attributed to the use of inlaid diamond material and factors such as a large thermal conductivity area, resulting in prolonged service life due to enhanced thermal conductivity. However, the inlaid diamond drill requires high drilling speeds, leading to significant heat generation during operation. Additionally, processing the intricate configuration of inlaid diamond material is challenging and costly, constraining design possibilities for the drill.
The drilling tool designed in this study primarily focuses on enhancing the drilling efficiency, penetration capability, and adaptability to various operating conditions for extracting high-hardness Martian rocks. However, due to the limitations in experimental conditions, it was not feasible to simulate the actual Martian environment. Nevertheless, this study explored the temperature variation trends of the spiral drill head under different drilling speeds and pressures, offering insights for future research. In subsequent studies, we intend to consider the construction of Martian environmental conditions and incorporate temperature and atmospheric parameters for further investigation.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Y.L. and Y.T.; methodology, Y.T.; software, Z.D.; validation, J.Z.; formal analysis, W.Z.; investigation, J.J. and J.T.; resources, W.Z.; data curation, L.Z.; writing—original draft preparation, L.Z.; writing—review and editing, L.Z.; project administration, W.Z. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Heilongjiang Postdoctoral Fund (Grant No.LBH-Z20145), the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (Grant No.2021M690828), the Self-Planned Task of State Key Laboratory of Robotics and System (Grant No.SKLRS202113B), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No.52105549), the Joint Funds of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No.U2013603), the National Key Research and Development Program of China (Grant No.2022YFA1204604).

Data Availability Statement

Data are contained within the article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Li, B.; Zhang, C.; Sheng, C.; Fan, J.; Liu, D. Design and experiment of deployment mechanism for Mars subsurface radar. Chin. Space Sci. Technol. 2023, 43, 87–93. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  2. Yang, M.; Zheng, Y.; Ni, Y.; Huang, X.; Zhang, Z.; Xing, Z. Progress and prospect in planetary exploration of solar system. Chin. Space Sci. Technol. 2023, 43, 1–12. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Reiter, J.W.; Guerrero, J.L.; Wu, D.; Wang, G.Y. Advanced planetary drill technology and applications to future space missions. In Proceedings of the Space Resources Roundtable VII. LEAG Conference on Lunar Exploration, League City, TX, USA, 25–28 October 2005; LPI: Houston, TX, USA, 2005; p. 75. [Google Scholar]
  4. Lyu, J.; Li, Q.; Hu, D.; Luo, H.; Zou, X. Mechanical model for lunar surface sampling based on modular theory. Chin. Space Sci. Technol. 2023, 43, 63–72. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  5. Yuan, Z.; Mu, R.; Zhao, H.; Wang, K. Predictive Model of a Mole-Type Burrowing Robot for Lunar Subsurface Exploration. Aerospace 2023, 10, 190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Gorevan, S.P.; Myrick, T.; Davis, K.; Chau, J.J.; Bartlett, P.; Mukherjee, S.; Anderson, R.; Squyres, S.W.; Arvidson, R.E.; Madsen, M.B.; et al. Rock abrasion tool: Mars exploration rover mission. J. Geophys. Res. Planets 2003, 108, 8068. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Fulford, P.; Jessen, S.; Harris, C.; Boucher, D. Sample acquisition, processing and handling systems for future Mars missions. Acta Astronaut. 2007, 61, 1061–1065. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Anderson, R.C.; Jandura, L.; Okon, A.B.; Sunshine, D.; Roumeliotis, C.; Beegle, L.W.; Hurowitz, J.; Kennedy, B.; Limonadi, D.; McCloskey, S.; et al. Collecting samples in Gale Crater, Mars; an overview of the Mars Science Laboratory sample acquisition, sample processing and handling system. Space Sci. Rev. 2012, 170, 57–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Spohn, T.; Hudson, T.L.; Marteau, E.; Golombek, M.; Grott, M.; Wippermann, T.; Ali, K.S.; Schmelzbach, C.; Kedar, S.; Hurst, K.; et al. The InSight HP3 penetrator (Mole) on Mars: Soil properties derived from the penetration attempts and related activities. Space Sci. Rev. 2022, 218, 72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Spohn, T.; Hudson, T.L.; Witte, L.; Wippermann, T.; Wisniewski, L.; Kedziora, B.; Vrettos, C.; Lorenz, R.D.; Golombek, M.; Lichtenheldt, R.; et al. The InSight-HP3 mole on Mars: Lessons learned from attempts to penetrate to depth in the Martian soil. Adv. Space Res. 2022, 69, 3140–3163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Brasser, R.; Mojzsis, S.J.; Matsumura, S.; Ida, S. The cool and distant formation of Mars. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 2017, 468, 85–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Moeller, R.C.; Jandura, L.; Rosette, K.; Robinson, M.; Samuels, J.; Silverman, M.; Brown, K.; Duffy, E.; Yazzie, A.; Jens, E.; et al. The Sampling and Caching Subsystem (SCS) for the scientific exploration of Jezero crater by the Mars 2020 Perseverance rover. Space Sci. Rev. 2021, 217, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Manthri, S.; Pusavec, F.; Zacny, K.A.; Taylor, L.A.; Dillon, J.O.W.; Jawahir, I.S. Experimental investigation of drilling performance of PCD compact core drills on basalt simulating sustainable dry drilling on Mars. In Earth & Space 2008: Engineering, Science, Construction, and Operations in Challenging Environments; American Society of Civil Engineers: Reston, VA, USA, 2008; pp. 1–10. [Google Scholar]
  14. Bonita, R.; Shiraishi, L.; Robinson, M.; Carsten, J.; Volpe, R.; Trebi-Ollennu, A.; Arvidson, R.E.; Chu, P.C.; Wilson, J.J.; Davis, K.R. The phoenix mars lander robotic arm. In Proceedings of the 2009 IEEE Aerospace Conference, Big Sky, MT, USA, 7–14 March 2009; IEEE: Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2009; pp. 1–12. [Google Scholar]
  15. Bonita, R.; Shiraishi, L.; Robinson, M.; Arvidson, R.E.; Chu, P.C.; Wilson, J.J.; Davis, K.R.; Paulsen, G.; Kusack, A.G.; Archer, D.; et al. NASA Mars 2007 Phoenix lander robotic arm and icy soil acquisition device. J. Geophys. Res. Planets 2008, 113, E00A01. [Google Scholar]
  16. Renault, M.; Lappas, V. Design of a Mars Ascent Vehicle Using HyImpulse’s Hybrid Propulsion. Aerospace 2023, 10, 1030. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Myrick, T.; Davis, K.; Wilson, J. Rock abrasion tool. In Proceedings of the 37th Aerospace Mechanisms Symposium; Galveston, TX, USA, 19–21 May 2004, NASA: Washington, DC, USA, 2004; pp. 277–290. [Google Scholar]
  18. Grotzinger, J.P.; Crisp, J.; Vasavada, A.R.; Anderson, R.C.; Baker, C.J.; Barry, R.; Blake, D.F.; Conrad, P.; Edgett, K.S.; Ferdowski, B.; et al. Mars Science Laboratory mission and science investigation. Space Sci. Rev. 2012, 170, 5–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Zacny, K.; Bar-Cohen, Y.; Brennan, M.; Briggs, G.; Cooper, G.; Davis, K.; Dolgin, B.; Glaser, D.; Glass, B.; Gorevan, S.; et al. Drilling systems for extraterrestrial subsurface exploration. Astrobiology 2008, 8, 665–706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Battistelli, E.; Falciani, P.; Magnani, P.; Midollini, B.; Preti, G.; Re, E. Galileo Avionica’s technologies and instruments for planetary exploration. Orig. Life Evol. Biosph. 2006, 36, 587–596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Stoker, C.R.; Lemke, L.G.; Cannon, H.; Glass, B.; Dunagan, S.; Zavaleta, J.; Miller, D.; Gomez-Elvira, J. Field simulation of a drilling mission to mars to search for subsurface life. In Proceedings of the 36th Annual Lunar and Planetary Science Conference; League City, TX, USA, 14–18 March 2005, NASA: Washington, DC, USA, 2005; p. 1537. [Google Scholar]
  22. Paulsen, G.L.; Mumm, E.; Kennedy, T.; Chu, P.; Davis, K.; Frader-Thompson, S.; Petrich, K.; Glass, B. Development of autonomous drills for planetary exploration. In Proceedings of the 37th Annual Lunar and Planetary Science Conference; League City, TX, USA, 13–17 March 2006, NASA: Washington, DC, USA, 2006; p. 2358. [Google Scholar]
  23. Prieto-Ballesteros, O.; Matrínez-Frías, J.; Schutt, J.; Sutter, B.; Heldmann, J.L.; Bell, M.S.; Battler, M.; Cannon, H.; Gómez-Elvira, J.; Stoker, C.R. The subsurface geology of Río Tinto: Material examined during a simulated Mars drilling mission for the Mars Astrobiology Research and Technology Experiment (MARTE). Astrobiology 2008, 8, 1013–1021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Zhang, Y.; Zhang, T.; Wei, H.; Liu, J.; Wang, W.; Yuan, X.; Pang, Y.; Guan, Y.; Hou, X.; Xu, K. Advances in extraterrestrial drilling technology to discover the secrets hidden inside celestial bodies. Space Sci. Rev. 2022, 218, 47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Liu, H.; Xiao, L.; Wang, J.; Shu, W.; Yang, Z.; Zhao, J. Preparation and properties of PSI HX series analogue Martian rocks. In Proceedings of the Abstracts of the 17th Annual Conference of the Chinese Society of Mineralogical and Petrochemical Geochemistry, Hangzhou, China, 19–22 April 2019; p. 1239. (In Chinese). [Google Scholar]
  26. Peters, G.H.; Carey, E.M.; Anderson, R.C.; Abbey, W.J.; Kinnett, R.; Watkins, J.A.; Schemel, M.; Lashore, M.O.; Chasek, M.D.; Green, W.; et al. Uniaxial compressive strengths of rocks drilled at Gale Crater, Mars. Geophys. Res. Lett. 2018, 45, 108–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Nahm, A.L.; Schultz, R.A. Outcrop-scale physical properties of Burns formation at Meridiani Planum, Mars. Geophys. Res. Lett. 2007, 34, L20203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Bartlett, P.W.; Basso, B.; Kusack, A.; Wilson, J.; Zacny, K. New Rock Physical Properties Assessments from the Mars Exploration Rover Rock Abrasion Tool (RAT). In AGU Fall Meeting Abstracts; American Geophysical Union: Washington, DC, USA, 2005; p. P21A-0135. [Google Scholar]
  29. Thomson, B.J.; Bridges, N.T.; Cohen, J.; Hurowitz, J.A.; Lennon, A.; Paulsen, G.; Zacny, K. Estimating rock compressive strength from Rock Abrasion Tool (RAT) grinds. J. Geophys. Res. Planets 2013, 118, 1233–1244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Morrow, C.; Lockner, D.; Okubo, C. Mechanical Properties of Simulated Mars Materials: Gypsum-Rich Sandstones and Lapilli Tuff; US Geological Survey: Reston, VA, USA, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  31. Li, J.L.; Yang, W.F.; Yu, Z.R. Geotechnical Drilling Engineering; China University of Mining and Technology Press: Xuzhou, China, 2005. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  32. Zhang, W.W. Research on Creep-Digging Submerged Exploration Technology for Subsurface Lunar Soil. Ph.D. Thesis, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin, China, 2019. (In Chinese). [Google Scholar]
  33. Ding, Y.H. Research on Rock Drilling Load Characteristics of Spiral Core Drill Bit. Master’s Thesis, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin, China, 2015. (In Chinese). [Google Scholar]
  34. Anttila, M. Concept Evaluation of Mars Drilling and Sampling Instrument; Helsinki University of Technology: Espoo, Finland, 2005. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. PCD compact core drilling rig [13].
Figure 1. PCD compact core drilling rig [13].
Aerospace 11 00272 g001
Figure 2. Schematic design.
Figure 2. Schematic design.
Aerospace 11 00272 g002aAerospace 11 00272 g002b
Figure 3. Diamond grain arrangement on the profile of the drill bit.
Figure 3. Diamond grain arrangement on the profile of the drill bit.
Aerospace 11 00272 g003
Figure 4. Bit resistance by configuration [29]. Note: PL-90 is a flat blank drill, CS-90 is a conical blank drill with 90° spiral rise angle, CS-65 is a conical blank drill with 90° spiral rise angle, and CS-45 is a conical blank drill with 90° spiral rise angle.
Figure 4. Bit resistance by configuration [29]. Note: PL-90 is a flat blank drill, CS-90 is a conical blank drill with 90° spiral rise angle, CS-65 is a conical blank drill with 90° spiral rise angle, and CS-45 is a conical blank drill with 90° spiral rise angle.
Aerospace 11 00272 g004
Figure 5. Two forms of grinding of the diamond head body.
Figure 5. Two forms of grinding of the diamond head body.
Aerospace 11 00272 g005
Figure 6. Schematic diagram of the bottom and outer edges.
Figure 6. Schematic diagram of the bottom and outer edges.
Aerospace 11 00272 g006
Figure 7. Structure of mini drill milling machine.
Figure 7. Structure of mini drill milling machine.
Aerospace 11 00272 g007
Figure 8. Counterweight structure and mounting method.
Figure 8. Counterweight structure and mounting method.
Aerospace 11 00272 g008
Figure 9. Physical drawing of an impregnated diamond bit.
Figure 9. Physical drawing of an impregnated diamond bit.
Aerospace 11 00272 g009
Figure 10. Physical drawing of the drilled object.
Figure 10. Physical drawing of the drilled object.
Aerospace 11 00272 g010
Figure 11. Drilling speed variation.
Figure 11. Drilling speed variation.
Aerospace 11 00272 g011
Figure 12. Variation of wear data for straight junk slot drills.
Figure 12. Variation of wear data for straight junk slot drills.
Aerospace 11 00272 g012
Figure 13. Macro drill wear.
Figure 13. Macro drill wear.
Aerospace 11 00272 g013
Figure 14. Micro-morphological characterization of the inlay.
Figure 14. Micro-morphological characterization of the inlay.
Aerospace 11 00272 g014
Figure 15. Basalt core drilled at the end of the test.
Figure 15. Basalt core drilled at the end of the test.
Aerospace 11 00272 g015
Figure 16. Data of basalt drilling with different weight on bits.
Figure 16. Data of basalt drilling with different weight on bits.
Aerospace 11 00272 g016
Figure 17. Measurement of the temperature rise of the drill.
Figure 17. Measurement of the temperature rise of the drill.
Aerospace 11 00272 g017
Figure 18. Drilling temperature rise data for different drilling conditions.
Figure 18. Drilling temperature rise data for different drilling conditions.
Aerospace 11 00272 g018
Figure 19. Cloud map of temperature rise in basalt drilling.
Figure 19. Cloud map of temperature rise in basalt drilling.
Aerospace 11 00272 g019
Figure 20. Variation curve of temperature rise at the front end of the drill.
Figure 20. Variation curve of temperature rise at the front end of the drill.
Aerospace 11 00272 g020
Table 1. Parameters of Martian rock index.
Table 1. Parameters of Martian rock index.
Serial NumberIndexParameters
1Natural body density2.5~2.9 g/ c m 3
2Angle of internal friction40~60°
3Poisson’s ratio0.18~0.29
4Modulus of elasticity2.1~21.1 GPa
5Compressive strength1.5~130 MPa
Table 2. Key parameters and structure schematic drawing of the junk shot.
Table 2. Key parameters and structure schematic drawing of the junk shot.
TraitParameters
Conical Straight Junk Slot Drill BitSpiral Junk Slot with Long Outflow Edge
Front angle of grinding edge/°030
Back angle of grinding edge/°1717
Drill body formConicalConical
Drill base conical angle/°130130
Height of bottom edge/mm2.53
Side exit height/mm1.52
Number of grinding edges44
Table 3. Parameters of the impregnated blocks.
Table 3. Parameters of the impregnated blocks.
IndexParametersIndexParameters
Grain density of impregnated blocks10–12 grains/caratBlades>0.02 mm
Abrasive grain size0.5~0.7 mmNumber of diamond grains81,870
Total weight of pregnancy inserts10 to 12 caratsRock breaking efficiency0.57 mm3
Abrasive grain arrangementEquidistant
Table 4. Basic parameters of mini drilling and milling machine.
Table 4. Basic parameters of mini drilling and milling machine.
NameParameters
Drilling capacity13 mm
Surface milling capacity16 mm
End milling capacity30 mm
Motor power500 W
Voltage/frequency220 V/50 Hz
Spindle conicalMT3
Spindle speed100–2500 rpm ± 10%
Table 5. The K-type thermocouple and parameters.
Table 5. The K-type thermocouple and parameters.
Picture of the InstrumentNameParameters
Aerospace 11 00272 i001Instrument modelYFT-610L
Probe typeGlass fiber and external steel structure probe
Measuring range−40~900 °C
Measuring error±1 °C
Measuring frequency1 s/time
Table 6. Diamond bit drilling and coring test program.
Table 6. Diamond bit drilling and coring test program.
Verifying PerformanceInput ParametersOutput Parameters
Drilling speedRotary speed, Drilling time, Different configurationsDrilling speed
Wear resistance of drill bitsRotary speed, Weight on bit, Different configurationsWear mass loss, Micro-morphological characterization of the matrix
Drilling loadDrilling time, Weight on bitDrilling depth
Sample temperature riseRotary speed, Weight on bitSample temperature rise
Table 7. Parameters of the drilled object.
Table 7. Parameters of the drilled object.
Performance TraitStone Type
MarbleBasalt
Main mineral componentsCalcite, dolomiteFeldspar, Pyroxene
Density2.6~2.8 g/cm32.8~3.3 g/cm3
Poisson’s ratio0.10~0.350.10~0.35
Compressive strength (MPa)47~140250 (150~350)
Tensile strength (MPa)7~2010~30
Cohesion(MPa)15~3020~60
Angle of internal friction (°)35~5048~55
Hardness (HB)35~7
Table 8. Drilling speed test blank.
Table 8. Drilling speed test blank.
Rotary SpeedDrilling Time
800 rpm5 s10 s15 s20 s
1200 rpm5 s10 s15 s20 s
Table 9. Wear mass loss test blank.
Table 9. Wear mass loss test blank.
Test GroupWeight on bit/NRotary Speed/rpm
Influence of rotary speed on the amount of wear on the drill bit150600
800
1200
2000
Influence of weight on bit on the amount of bit wear150600
250
350
450
1000
Table 10. Sample temperature rise test blank.
Table 10. Sample temperature rise test blank.
Test GroupWeight on bit/NRotary Speed/rpm
Influence of rotary speed on drill temperature rise150800
1200
2000
Influence of weight on bit-on-bit temperature rise150800
250
350
450
1000
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Liu, Y.; Zhang, L.; Tian, Y.; Zhang, W.; Tang, J.; Zhang, J.; Duan, Z.; Ji, J. Design and Experimental Study of a Drilling Tool for Mars Rock Sampling. Aerospace 2024, 11, 272. https://doi.org/10.3390/aerospace11040272

AMA Style

Liu Y, Zhang L, Tian Y, Zhang W, Tang J, Zhang J, Duan Z, Ji J. Design and Experimental Study of a Drilling Tool for Mars Rock Sampling. Aerospace. 2024; 11(4):272. https://doi.org/10.3390/aerospace11040272

Chicago/Turabian Style

Liu, Yafang, Lu Zhang, Ye Tian, Weiwei Zhang, Junyue Tang, Jiahang Zhang, Zhangqing Duan, and Jie Ji. 2024. "Design and Experimental Study of a Drilling Tool for Mars Rock Sampling" Aerospace 11, no. 4: 272. https://doi.org/10.3390/aerospace11040272

APA Style

Liu, Y., Zhang, L., Tian, Y., Zhang, W., Tang, J., Zhang, J., Duan, Z., & Ji, J. (2024). Design and Experimental Study of a Drilling Tool for Mars Rock Sampling. Aerospace, 11(4), 272. https://doi.org/10.3390/aerospace11040272

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop