Net Zero Dairy Farming—Advancing Climate Goals with Big Data and Artificial Intelligence
Abstract
:1. Climate Change and the Drive for Net Zero Emissions
1.1. Global Climate Crisis and its Impacts
1.2. The Concept and Importance of Achieving Net Zero Emissions
1.3. The Role of International Commitments in Climate Change Mitigation
2. Environmental Footprint of the Canadian Dairy Industry
2.1. The Economic and Environmental Significance of Dairy Farming in Canada
2.2. Main Sources of GHG Emissions in Dairy Farming: Enteric Fermentation and Manure Management
2.2.1. Enteric Fermentation
2.2.2. Manure Management
2.2.3. Synthetic Fertilizers
2.2.4. Fossil Fuel Use
2.3. Environmental Impact of Dairy Farming Emissions
3. Sustainability Challenges and Industry Efforts in Dairy Farming
3.1. Addressing Methane Emissions from Enteric Fermentation
3.2. Innovations in Manure Management
3.3. Energy Use in Dairy Processing and its Environmental Implications
4. The Transformative Impact of Big Data and AI in Dairy Farming
4.1. Benchmarking for Performance and Sustainability
4.2. Leveraging Cross-Industry Insights for Dairy Farming
5. The Economic and Structural Landscape of Canadian Dairy Industry
5.1. Industry Size and Economic Impact
5.2. Global Market Presence
5.3. Diversity in Farm Structures and Operations
5.4. Regulatory Framework Governing Canadian Dairy Farming
5.5. Economic and Policy Challenges
6. Strategies for GHG Emission Reduction in Dairy Farming
6.1. Innovative Farming Practices for Emission Reduction
6.1.1. Optimized Feed Efficiency
6.1.2. Advanced Manure Management
6.1.3. Pasture-Based Farming
6.1.4. Precision Agriculture
6.1.5. Biogas Systems
6.1.6. Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) Technologies
6.2. Role of Policy Initiatives and Incentives in Emission Reduction
6.2.1. Federal and Provincial Incentives
6.2.2. Carbon Pricing and Trading Systems
6.2.3. Research and Development Support
6.2.4. Extension Services and Education
7. The Future of Dairy Farming with Big Data
7.1. Emerging Technologies in Big Data for Dairy Farming
7.1.1. Advanced Sensors and Monitoring Systems
7.1.2. Data Analytics for Enhanced Decision Making
7.1.3. Predictive Modeling for Proactive Management
7.2. Integration with Other Technologies: IoT and Robotics
Robotics and Automation
7.3. Policy and Industry Implications of Technological Advancements
7.3.1. Regulatory Frameworks for Data Use and Privacy
7.3.2. Industry Adaptation and Skill Development
7.3.3. Economic Considerations and Market Adaptation
7.4. Digital Technology’s Role in Enhancing Dairy Farm Emission Efficiency
8. Artificial Intelligence in Emission Management and Energy Efficiency in Dairy Farming
AI in Monitoring and Reducing Energy Use
9. Future Pathways—Implementing AI and Big Data in Dairy Farming for Climate Change Mitigation and Emissions Reduction
9.1. Immediate Strategies
9.1.1. Enhanced Data Collection and Analysis
- Invest in sensor technologies and IoT devices to collect comprehensive data on various aspects of dairy farming, including feed intake, animal health, and manure management.
- Utilize advanced data analytics and machine learning algorithms to process these data, identifying patterns and correlations that can inform more sustainable farming practices.
9.1.2. Predictive Analytics for Resource Optimization
- Develop AI models that can predict optimal feeding strategies, reducing waste and improving the efficiency of resource use.
- Implement systems that can forecast environmental impacts and provide recommendations for minimizing carbon footprints.
9.2. Long-Term Strategies
9.2.1. Integration of Climate Models with Farm Management Systems
- Collaborate with climate scientists to integrate global and regional climate models into AI-driven farm management systems.
- Use these integrated models to anticipate and mitigate the impacts of climate variability on dairy farming operations.
9.2.2. Development of AI-Driven Sustainable Practices
- Focus on AI innovations that promote sustainable practices, such as precision agriculture techniques to optimize the use of water, fertilizers, and energy.
- Explore AI-based solutions for managing waste and manure in environmentally friendly ways, such as converting waste into renewable energy sources.
9.3. Cross-Disciplinary Collaboration and Knowledge Sharing
Fostering Industry–Academia Partnerships
- Encourage partnerships between dairy farmers, technology companies, and academic institutions to drive innovation and research in AI and Big Data applications.
- Facilitate knowledge sharing and technology transfer through workshops, conferences, and joint research projects.
9.4. Policy Advocacy and Support for Technological Adoption
- Engage with policymakers to advocate for support and funding for the adoption of AI and Big Data technologies in dairy farming.
- Work towards the development of regulatory frameworks that encourage innovation while ensuring ethical and sustainable use of technology.
9.5. Adaptive and Evolving Methodologies
Continuous Improvement and Adaptation
- Establish a culture of continuous improvement, where technologies and methodologies are regularly reviewed and updated based on new research and changing climate conditions.
- Embrace adaptive management approaches that allow for flexibility and responsiveness to new challenges and opportunities.
9.6. Monitoring and Evaluation
- Implement robust monitoring and evaluation systems to assess the effectiveness of AI and Big Data applications in reducing emissions and addressing climate change.
- Use these assessments to refine and improve strategies over time, ensuring that the dairy farming industry can effectively contribute to global climate change mitigation efforts.
10. Challenges and Future Directions
Addressing Challenges and Enhancing Policies for Sustainable Transformation
11. Overcoming Technological, Economic, and Policy Barriers
11.1. Enhancing Policies for Emission Reduction and Sustainable Practices
11.2. Balancing Technological Advancement with Ethical Farming Practices
12. Summary and Conclusions
Funding
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Easterling, D.R.; Kunkel, K.E. Climate Change in the Earth System. In Climate Change and Estuaries; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2023; pp. 23–42. [Google Scholar]
- Sudo, K. Atmospheric Mixing Ratios of Ozone and Radiative Forcing. In Handbook of Air Quality and Climate Change; Springer Nature Singapore: Singapore, 2023; pp. 997–1029. [Google Scholar]
- Pouresmaeily, M. Ecological Responses to Climate Change. In Climate Change: The Social and Scientific Construct; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2022; pp. 133–149. [Google Scholar]
- Falkenberg, L.J.; Bellerby, R.G.; Connell, S.D.; Fleming, L.E.; Maycock, B.; Russell, B.D.; Sullivan, F.J.; Dupont, S. Ocean acidification and human health. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 4563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rogelj, J.; Geden, O.; Cowie, A.; Reisinger, A. Three ways to improve net-zero emissions targets. Nature 2021, 591, 365–368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- McLaren, D.P.; Tyfield, D.P.; Willis, R.; Szerszynski, B.; Markusson, N.O. Beyond “net-zero”: A case for separate targets for emissions reduction and negative emissions. Front. Clim. 2019, 1, 4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Huang, M.T.; Zhai, P.M. Achieving Paris Agreement temperature goals requires carbon neutrality by middle century with far-reaching transitions in the whole society. Adv. Clim. Change Res. 2021, 12, 281–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wilberforce, T.; Olabi, A.G.; Sayed, E.T.; Elsaid, K.; Abdelkareem, M.A. Progress in carbon capture technologies. Sci. Total Environ. 2021, 761, 143203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mentes, M. Sustainable development economy and the development of green economy in the European Union. Energy Sustain. Soc. 2023, 13, 32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Petri, F.; Biedenkopf, K. “United we stand, divided we fall”: The effects of US contestation on EU foreign climate policy ambition. Glob. Aff. 2020, 6, 381–397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hughes, L. Warming of 1.5 °C What we do now matters more than ever. ReNew Technol. Sustain. Future 2019, 146, 24–27. [Google Scholar]
- Stern, N.; Valero, A. Innovation, growth and the transition to net-zero emissions. Res. Policy 2021, 50, 104293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wattiaux, M.A.; Uddin, M.E.; Letelier, P.; Jackson, R.D.; Larson, R.A. Invited Review: Emission and mitigation of greenhouse gases from dairy farms: The cow, the manure, and the field. Appl. Anim. Sci. 2019, 35, 238–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gavrilova, O.; Leip, A.; Dong, H.; MacDonald, J.D.; Gomez Bravo, C.A.; Amon, B.; Barahona Rosales, R.; Prado, A.D.; de Lima, M.A.; Oyhantcabal, W.; et al. Emissions from Livestock and Manure Management; IPCC: Geneva, Switzerland, 2019. [Google Scholar]
- Windfeld, E.; Lhermie, G. The value of Canadian agriculture: Direct, indirect, and induced economic impacts. Front. Sustain. Food Syst. 2022, 6, 940968. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Biden, S.; Ker, A.P.; Duff, S. Impacts of trade liberalization in Canada’s supply managed dairy industry. Agric. Econ. 2020, 51, 535–552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Berton, M.; Bovolenta, S.; Corazzin, M.; Gallo, L.; Pinterits, S.; Ramanzin, M.; Ressi, W.; Spigarelli, C.; Zuliani, A.; Sturaro, E. Environmental impacts of milk production and processing in the Eastern Alps: A “cradle-to-dairy gate” LCA approach. J. Clean. Prod. 2021, 303, 127056. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Clay, N.; Garnett, T.; Lorimer, J. Dairy intensification: Drivers, impacts and alternatives. Ambio 2020, 49, 35–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Biagetti, E.; Gislon, G.; Martella, A.; Zucali, M.; Bava, L.; Franco, S.; Sandrucci, A. Comparison of the use of life cycle assessment and ecological footprint methods for evaluating environmental performances in dairy production. Sci. Total Environ. 2023, 905, 166845. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cholewińska, P.; Czyż, K.; Nowakowski, P.; Wyrostek, A. The microbiome of the digestive system of ruminants—A review. Anim. Health Res. Rev. 2020, 21, 3–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ungerfeld, E.M.; Cancino-Padilla, N.; Vera-Aguilera, N. Fermentation in the rumen. In Microbial Fermentations in Nature and as Designed Processes; Hurst, C.J., Ed.; Wiley: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2023; pp. 133–165. [Google Scholar]
- Liu, S.; Proudman, J.; Mitloehner, F.M. Rethinking methane from animal agriculture. CABI Agric. Biosci. 2021, 2, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dobson, S.; Goodday, V.; Winter, J. If it matters, measure it: A review of methane sources and mitigation policy in Canada. Int. Rev. Environ. Resour. Econ. 2023, 16, 309–429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Parker, K. “Cow-nting down”: Regulatory measures to reduce New Zealand’s biogenic methane emissions. N. Z. J. Environ. Law 2021, 25, 191–215. [Google Scholar]
- Beauchemin, K.A.; Ungerfeld, E.M.; Eckard, R.J.; Wang, M. Fifty years of research on rumen methanogenesis: Lessons learned and future challenges for mitigation. Animal 2020, 14, s2–s16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Honan, M.; Feng, X.; Tricarico, J.M.; Kebreab, E. Feed additives as a strategic approach to reduce enteric methane production in cattle: Modes of action, effectiveness and safety. Anim. Prod. Sci. 2022, 62, 1303–1317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rivera, J.E.; Chará, J. CH4 and N2O emissions from cattle excreta: A review of main drivers and mitigation strategies in grazing systems. Front. Sustain. Food Syst. 2021, 5, 657936. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Costa, C.; Wironen, M.; Racette, K.; Wollenberg, E.K. Global Warming Potential*(GWP*): Understanding the Implications for Mitigating Methane Emissions in Agriculture; CGIAR Research Program on Climate Change, Agriculture and Food Security (CCAFS): Wageningen, The Netherlands, 2021. [Google Scholar]
- Rotz, A.; Stout, R.; Leytem, A.; Feyereisen, G.; Waldrip, H.; Thoma, G.; Holly, M.; Bjorneberg, D.; Baker, J.; Vadas, P.; et al. Environmental assessment of United States dairy farms. J. Clean. Prod. 2021, 315, 128153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Khoshnevisan, B.; Duan, N.; Tsapekos, P.; Awasthi, M.K.; Liu, Z.; Mohammadi, A.; Angelidaki, I.; Tsang, D.C.; Zhang, Z.; Pan, J.; et al. A critical review on livestock manure biorefinery technologies: Sustainability, challenges, and future perspectives. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2021, 135, 110033. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- O’Brien, P.L.; Hatfield, J.L. Dairy Manure and Synthetic Fertilizer: A Meta-Analysis of Crop Production and Environmental Quality. Agrosyst. Geosci. Environ. 2019, 2, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Woolery, S.; Osei, E.; Yu, M.; Guney, S.; Lovell, A.; Jafri, H. The Carbon Footprint of a 5000-Milking-Head Dairy Operation in Central Texas. Agriculture 2023, 13, 2109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Arvidsson Segerkvist, K.; Hansson, H.; Sonesson, U.; Gunnarsson, S. Research on environmental, economic, and social sustainability in dairy farming: A systematic mapping of current literature. Sustainability 2020, 12, 5502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ravishankara, A.R.; Daniel, J.S.; Portmann, R.W. Nitrous oxide (N2O): The dominant ozone-depleting substance emitted in the 21st century. Science 2009, 326, 123–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Neethirajan, S. Artificial Intelligence and Sensor Technologies in Dairy Livestock Export: Charting a Digital Transformation. Sensors 2023, 23, 7045. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Neethirajan, S. The role of sensors, big data and machine learning in modern animal farming. Sens. Bio-Sens. Res. 2020, 29, 100367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Neethirajan, S. AI-Driven Climate Neutrality in Dairy Farming: Benchmarking Emissions for Sustainable Transformation. 2023. Available online: https://osf.io/preprints/osf/4znq5 (accessed on 15 December 2023).
- Pitta, D.W.; Indugu, N.; Melgar, A.; Hristov, A.; Challa, K.; Vecchiarelli, B.; Hennessy, M.; Narayan, K.; Duval, S.; Kindermann, M.; et al. The effect of 3-nitrooxypropanol, a potent methane inhibitor, on ruminal microbial gene expression profiles in dairy cows. Microbiome 2022, 10, 1–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fouts, J.Q.; Honan, M.C.; Roque, B.M.; Tricarico, J.M.; Kebreab, E. Enteric methane mitigation interventions. Transl. Anim. Sci. 2022, 6, txac041. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Obileke, K.; Nwokolo, N.; Makaka, G.; Mukumba, P.; Onyeaka, H. Anaerobic digestion: Technology for biogas production as a source of renewable energy—A review. Energy Environ. 2021, 32, 191–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Malliaroudaki, M.I.; Watson, N.J.; Ferrari, R.; Nchari, L.N.; Gomes, R.L. Energy management for a net zero dairy supply chain under climate change. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2022, 126, 153–167. [Google Scholar]
- Malliaroudaki, M.I.; Watson, N.J.; Glover, Z.J.; Nchari, L.N.; Gomes, R.L. Net zero roadmap modelling for sustainable dairy manufacturing and distribution. Chem. Eng. J. 2023, 475, 145734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Paris, B.; Vandorou, F.; Tyris, D.; Balafoutis, A.T.; Vaiopoulos, K.; Kyriakarakos, G.; Manolakos, D.; Papadakis, G. Energy use in the EU livestock sector: A review recommending energy efficiency measures and renewable energy sources adoption. Appl. Sci. 2022, 12, 2142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bertoglio, R.; Corbo, C.; Renga, F.M.; Matteucci, M. The digital agricultural revolution: A bibliometric analysis literature review. IEEE Access 2021, 9, 134762–134782. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Neethirajan, S.; Kemp, B. Digital livestock farming. Sens. Bio-Sens. Res. 2021, 32, 100408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Neethirajan, S. SOLARIA-SensOr-driven resiLient and adaptive monitoRIng of farm Animals. Agriculture 2023, 13, 436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kofler, J.; Suntinger, M.; Mayerhofer, M.; Linke, K.; Maurer, L.; Hund, A.; Fiedler, A.; Duda, J.; Egger-Danner, C. Benchmarking based on regularly recorded claw health data of Austrian dairy cattle for implementation in the Cattle Data Network (RDV). Animals 2022, 12, 808. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Poulopoulou, I.; Zanon, T.; Alrhmoun, M.; Katzenberger, K.; Holighaus, L.; Gauly, M. Development of a benchmarking tool to assess the welfare of dairy cattle on small-scale farms. J. Dairy Sci. 2023, 106, 6464–6475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kakani, V.; Nguyen, V.H.; Kumar, B.P.; Kim, H.; Pasupuleti, V.R. A critical review on computer vision and artificial intelligence in food industry. J. Agric. Food Res. 2020, 2, 100033. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Grandsir, C.; Falagán, N.; Alamar, M.C. Application of novel technologies to reach net-zero greenhouse gas emissions in the fresh pasteurised milk supply chain: A review. Int. J. Dairy Technol. 2023, 76, 38–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Snorek, J.; Cummings, W.; Hryniewicz, E.; Stevens, K.; Iannuzzi, R. Diversification strategies for the resilience of small New England dairies. J. Agric. Food Syst. Community Dev. 2023, 12, 1–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mazzetto, A.M.; Falconer, S.; Ledgard, S. Mapping the carbon footprint of milk production from cattle: A systematic review. J. Dairy Sci. 2022, 105, 9713–9725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Auclair, O.; Burgos, S.A. Carbon footprint of Canadian self-selected diets: Comparing intake of foods, nutrients, and diet quality between low-and high-greenhouse gas emission diets. J. Clean. Prod. 2021, 316, 128245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Peta, C. Canada’s Supply Management System and the Dairy Industry in the Era of Trade Liberalization: A Cultural Commodity? Am. Rev. Can. Stud. 2019, 49, 547–562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ritter, C.; Mills, K.E.; Weary, D.M.; von Keyserlingk, M.A. Perspectives of western Canadian dairy farmers on the future of farming. J. Dairy Sci. 2020, 103, 10273–10282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Denis-Robichaud, J.; Kelton, D.F.; Bauman, C.A.; Barkema, H.W.; Keefe, G.P.; Dubuc, J. Biosecurity and herd health management practices on Canadian dairy farms. J. Dairy Sci. 2019, 102, 9536–9547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Beauchemin, K.A.; Ungerfeld, E.M.; Abdalla, A.L.; Alvarez, C.; Arndt, C.; Becquet, P.; Benchaar, C.; Berndt, A.; Mauricio, R.M.; McAllister, T.A.; et al. Invited review: Current enteric methane mitigation options. J. Dairy Sci. 2022, 105, 9297–9326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Arndt, C.; Hristov, A.N.; Price, W.J.; McClelland, S.C.; Pelaez, A.M.; Cueva, S.F.; Oh, J.; Bannink, A.; Bayat, A.R.; Crompton, L.A.; et al. Strategies to mitigate enteric methane emissions by ruminants-a way to approach the 2.0 °C target. AgriRxiv 2021, AgriRxiv: 20210085288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Min, B.R.; Solaiman, S.; Waldrip, H.M.; Parker, D.; Todd, R.W.; Brauer, D. Dietary mitigation of enteric methane emissions from ruminants: A review of plant tannin mitigation options. Anim. Nutr. 2020, 6, 231–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bhatnagar, N.; Ryan, D.; Murphy, R.; Enright, A.M. A comprehensive review of green policy, anaerobic digestion of animal manure and chicken litter feedstock potential–Global and Irish perspective. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2022, 154, 111884. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yao, Y.; Huang, G.; An, C.; Chen, X.; Zhang, P.; Xin, X.; Shen, J.; Agnew, J. Anaerobic digestion of livestock manure in cold regions: Technological advancements and global impacts. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2020, 119, 109494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Franzluebbers, A.J. Cattle Grazing Effects on the Environment: Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Carbon Footprint. In Management Strategies for Sustainable Cattle Production in Southern Pastures; Academic Press: San Diego, CA, USA, 2020; pp. 11–34. [Google Scholar]
- Lal, R. Reducing carbon footprints of agriculture and food systems. Carbon Footpr. 2022, 1, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Niloofar, P.; Francis, D.P.; Lazarova-Molnar, S.; Vulpe, A.; Vochin, M.C.; Suciu, G.; Balanescu, M.; Anestis, V.; Bartzanas, T. Data-driven decision support in livestock farming for improved animal health, welfare and greenhouse gas emissions: Overview and challenges. Comput. Electron. Agric. 2021, 190, 106406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lovarelli, D.; Bacenetti, J.; Guarino, M. A review on dairy cattle farming: Is precision livestock farming the compromise for an environmental, economic and social sustainable production? J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 262, 121409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vitillo, J.G.; Eisaman, M.D.; Aradóttir, E.S.; Passarini, F.; Wang, T.; Sheehan, S.W. The role of carbon capture, utilization, and storage for economic pathways that limit global warming to below 1.5 °C. iScience 2022, 25, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Winsten, J.R.; Gorman, E.; Gravitz, A. Coordinating a “basket of incentives” to facilitate resilience in the dairy sector. J. Soil Water Conserv. 2020, 75, 144A–149A. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cameron, G.; Rosado, F.R.P.; Mederos, D.D.D. Agricultural co-operatives in Canada and Cuba: Trends, prospects and ways forward. Environ. Dev. Sustain. 2020, 22, 643–660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Stavins, R.N. Carbon Taxes vs. Cap and Trade: Theory and Practice; Harvard Project on Climate Agreements: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2019. [Google Scholar]
- Green, J.F. Does carbon pricing reduce emissions? A review of ex-post analyses. Environ. Res. Lett. 2021, 16, 043004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Henchion, M.M.; Regan, Á.; Beecher, M.; MackenWalsh, Á. Developing ‘Smart’ Dairy Farming Responsive to Farmers and Consumer-Citizens: A Review. Animals 2022, 12, 360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Steenwerth, K.L.; Hodson, A.K.; Bloom, A.J.; Carter, M.R.; Cattaneo, A.; Chartres, C.J.; Hatfield, J.L.; Henry, K.; Hopmans, J.W.; Horwath, W.R.; et al. Climate-smart agriculture global research agenda: Scientific basis for action. Agric. Food Secur. 2014, 3, 1–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- van Hilten, M.; Wolfert, S. 5G in agri-food-A review on current status, opportunities and challenges. Comput. Electron. Agric. 2022, 201, 107291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tian, F.; Wang, X.; Yu, S.; Wang, R.; Song, Z.; Yan, Y.; Li, F.; Wang, Z.; Yu, Z. Research on Navigation Path Extraction and Obstacle Avoidance Strategy for Pusher Robot in Dairy Farm. Agriculture 2022, 12, 1008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Duzha, A.; Alexakis, E.; Kyriazis, D.; Sahi, L.F.; Kandi, M.A. From Data Governance by design to Data Governance as a Service: A transformative human-centric data governance framework. In Proceedings of the 2023 7th International Conference on Cloud and Big Data Computing, Manchester, UK, 17–19 August 2023; pp. 10–20. [Google Scholar]
- Bibri, S.E.; Krogstie, J. A novel model for data-driven smart sustainable cities of the future: A strategic roadmap to transformational change in the era of big data. Future Cities Environ. 2021, 7, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, C.; Wang, X.; Bai, Z.; Wang, H.; Li, C. Does Digital Technology Application Promote Carbon Emission Efficiency in Dairy Farms? Evidence from China. Agriculture 2023, 13, 904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ji, B.; Banhazi, T.; Phillips, C.J.; Wang, C.; Li, B. A machine learning framework to predict the next month’s daily milk yield, milk composition and milking frequency for cows in a robotic dairy farm. Biosyst. Eng. 2022, 216, 186–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cockburn, M. Application and prospective discussion of machine learning for the management of dairy farms. Animals 2020, 10, 1690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Krupitzer, C.; Stein, A. Unleashing the Potential of Digitalization in the Agri-Food Chain for Integrated Food Systems. Annu. Rev. Food Sci. Technol. 2023, 15, 1–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Aspect of Benchmarking | Enteric Fermentation | Manure Management | Energy Use | Feed Efficiency | Water Usage |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Emission Source | Methane from digestion | Methane and nitrous oxide from storage | CO2 from fossil fuel use | Methane from digestion | Water management related energy use |
Quantification Method | CH4 measurements, LCA | Gas capture and analysis, LCA | Energy audits, carbon footprinting | Feed analysis, LCA | Water usage metering, energy audits |
Industry Average | X kg CH4/cow/year | Y kg N2O/ton manure | Z kWh/liter of milk | A kg CH4/ton feed | B liters/milk liter |
Best Practice Standard | Low-methane feed | Aerobic composting, digesters | Renewable energy use | High-efficiency feed | Water recycling systems |
Improvement Strategy | Feed additives, diet optimization | Manure treatment, efficient application | Solar, biogas energy | Precision feeding | Irrigation management, leak repairs |
Monitoring Frequency | Bi-annually | Annually | Quarterly | Annually | Bi-annually |
Compliance Requirement | Voluntary industry standards | Environmental regulations | Energy conservation laws | Sustainable farming certifications | Water management regulations |
Technology Used | Rumen sensors, data analytics | Emission capturing systems | Smart energy meters | AI-driven feeding systems | Automated irrigation |
Training Required | Feed management | Manure handling, system operation | Energy management | Nutritional management | Water conservation techniques |
Cost Implication | Moderate investment | High investment | High investment for renewables | Moderate investment | Moderate investment |
Potential Emission Reduction | Significant CH4 reduction | CH4 and N2O reduction | Significant CO2 reduction | CH4 reduction | Energy-related emission reduction |
Policy Focus | Objective | Key Components | Stakeholders Involved | Challenges | Potential Outcomes |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Benchmarking Standards | Establish industry-wide benchmarking standards for emissions and efficiency | Comparative analysis, Best practices, Performance metrics | Farmers, Industry regulators, Environmental agencies | Standardization across diverse farm operations | Consistent quality and sustainability metrics across the industry |
Big Data Utilization | Promote the use of Big Data for farm management optimization | Data collection, Analysis tools, Real-time monitoring | Farmers, Tech companies, Data analysts | Managing large datasets, Interpreting complex information. | Optimized farm operations, Enhanced decision making |
Emission Reduction Targets | Set clear and achievable emission reduction targets | Methane and N2O reduction, Carbon footprint assessment | Government, Environmental groups, Dairy producers | Balancing economic viability with environmental goals. | Significant reduction in greenhouse gas emissions |
AI Integration in Farming | Facilitate the integration of AI technologies in dairy farming | Predictive analytics, Herd management, Resource optimization | Tech developers, Farmers, AI experts | Adapting to new technologies, Overcoming resistance | Increased farm efficiency and reduced labor costs |
Data Privacy and Security | Ensure the security and privacy of farm data collected via digital means. | Data encryption, User consent, Ethical use guidelines | Farmers, Data protection agencies, Legal experts | Risk of data breaches, Maintaining farmer trust | Protected farmer data, Ethical technology usage |
Renewable Energy Incentives | Encourage the use of renewable energy sources through incentives. | Subsidies, Tax breaks, Green energy solutions | Energy companies, Farmers, Government bodies | Initial investment costs, Long-term sustainability | Reduced carbon footprint, Energy self-sufficiency |
Education and Training | Enhance farmer knowledge and skills in advanced technologies | Workshops, Online courses, Technical assistance | Educational institutions, Dairy farmers, Industry experts | Varied technological proficiency among farmers | Improved adoption of advanced farming technologies |
Public-Private Partnerships | Foster collaboration between government, industry, and academia | Joint funding, Knowledge exchange, Innovation incubators | Government, Corporates, Research institutions | Aligning goals and resources of different entities | Synergy in innovation, Accelerated technology transfer |
Environmental Regulation | Implement stringent environmental regulations to control emissions. | Compliance standards, Monitoring, Penalties for non-compliance | Regulatory bodies, Dairy farmers, Environmentalists | Ensuring regulations are effective yet feasible | Enhanced environmental protection, Sustainable dairy practices. |
Innovation and R&D Support | Support research and development in sustainable dairy farming technologies. | Innovative feed solutions, Waste management, Energy-efficient practices | Scientists, Dairy industry, Government funders | Translating research into practical, scalable solutions | Breakthroughs in sustainable farming techniques |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the author. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Neethirajan, S. Net Zero Dairy Farming—Advancing Climate Goals with Big Data and Artificial Intelligence. Climate 2024, 12, 15. https://doi.org/10.3390/cli12020015
Neethirajan S. Net Zero Dairy Farming—Advancing Climate Goals with Big Data and Artificial Intelligence. Climate. 2024; 12(2):15. https://doi.org/10.3390/cli12020015
Chicago/Turabian StyleNeethirajan, Suresh. 2024. "Net Zero Dairy Farming—Advancing Climate Goals with Big Data and Artificial Intelligence" Climate 12, no. 2: 15. https://doi.org/10.3390/cli12020015
APA StyleNeethirajan, S. (2024). Net Zero Dairy Farming—Advancing Climate Goals with Big Data and Artificial Intelligence. Climate, 12(2), 15. https://doi.org/10.3390/cli12020015