Next Article in Journal
Climate Risks Resilience Development: A Bibliometric Analysis of Climate-Related Early Warning Systems in Southern Africa
Previous Article in Journal
Equilibrium Climate after Spectral and Bolometric Irradiance Reduction in Grand Solar Minimum Simulations
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Analysis of Climate Variability and Its Implications on Rangelands in the Limpopo Province

by
Phumzile Maluleke
1,2,*,
Mokhele E. Moeletsi
2,3 and
Mitsuru Tsubo
4
1
Department of Agriculture and Animal Health, College of Agriculture and Environmental Sciences, University of South Africa, Private Bag X6, Florida 1710, South Africa
2
Agricultural Research Council-Natural Resources and Engineering, Private Bag X79, Pretoria 0001, South Africa
3
Risks and Vulnerability Assessment Centre, University of Limpopo, Private Bag X1106, Sovenga 0727, South Africa
4
Arid Land Research Center, Tottori University, 1390 Hamasaka, Tottori 680-0001, Japan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Climate 2024, 12(1), 2; https://doi.org/10.3390/cli12010002
Submission received: 25 October 2023 / Revised: 12 December 2023 / Accepted: 22 December 2023 / Published: 24 December 2023

Abstract

:
In recent decades, southern Africa has experienced a shift towards hotter and drier climate conditions, affecting vital sectors like agriculture, health, water, and energy. Scientific research has shown that the combination of high temperatures and unreliable rainfall can have detrimental effects on agricultural production. Thus, this study focused on assessing climate variability, with implications on rangelands in the Limpopo Province of South Africa over 38 years. Historical climate data from 15 stations, including rainfall and minimum and maximum temperatures from 1980 to 2018, were analysed. To achieve the main objective, various statistics including mean, standard deviation, and coefficient of variation (CV) were computed for all variables across four seasons. The results highlighted significant variability in rainfall, with Musina (71.2%) and Tshiombo (88.3%) stations displaying the highest variability during the September-to-April season. Both minimum and maximum temperatures displayed low variability. The Mann–Kendall test revealed both increasing and decreasing trends in minimum temperatures and rainfall across different stations. Notably, there was a significant increase in maximum temperatures. This study provides valuable climate information for decision makers, aiding in the planning and management of agricultural activities, particularly in understanding how climate variations affect forage availability in rangelands.

1. Introduction

Climate variability and change, along with their interaction with anthropogenic activities, present significant challenges that have global repercussions on food production [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8]. The complex mechanisms driving climate variability are influenced by various factors [9,10]. Variations in rainfall and temperature have been linked to various drivers such as El Niño Southern Oscillation (ENSO) across the globe [11,12,13]. Projections indicate that Africa will experience increased temperatures and unreliable rainfall during the 21st century [11,14,15,16,17].
Climate variability will affect various sectors such as agriculture, health, water, and energy [18]. Impacts resulting from climate variability and change range from sea level rise to increasing heat waves as well as variability in rainfall patterns [7,19,20,21,22,23]. These temperature and rainfall variations can have adverse effects, exacerbating existing challenges, including recurring droughts, floods, heatwaves, widespread poverty, and limited adaptive capacity in some regions [22]. For instance, a decline in grazing capacity has been noted globally, posing challenges for farmers and pastoralists who struggle to find sufficient grazing resources for both small and large livestock [4,6,20,24,25]. In most climatic regions, agricultural disruptions resulting from climate anomalies have led to substantial economic losses [1]. Moreover, tropical and subtropical areas, such as southern Africa, have primarily experienced adverse effects that have contributed to food insecurity and livelihood challenges [26,27,28,29]. The region has further witnessed increased maximum temperatures, marked by heatwaves [30], as well as unreliable rainfall patterns [31].
Agricultural production plays a critical role in South Africa’s economy, influencing food security, employment, and overall economic growth [7,8,32]. Many small-scale farmers in the Limpopo Province primarily rely on rain-fed farming for their livelihoods [31,33]. This makes them particularly vulnerable to climate variability, resulting in livestock losses due to extreme weather events such as heatwaves, dry spells, and heat-related diseases [7,8,31,33,34,35,36,37,38]. Additional impacts on livestock, especially in arid and semi-arid regions, include reduced carrying capacity (pasture, water quality, and quantity) which will affect stocking rates [25]. However, if the adaptation of farmers to climate variability can be enhanced, they will become less vulnerable to the aforementioned impacts [39].
Therefore, a comprehensive analysis of regional spatial and temporal rainfall and temperature variations is crucial to provide evidence of climate variability, enhancing local understanding and interpretation. The dissemination of this analysis is crucial to ensure that pertinent stakeholders, including farmers, extension services, and land managers, are well informed for making on-farm decisions. This encompasses tasks such as scheduling grazing periods, adjusting livestock numbers, conducting controlled burning of the veld, administering vaccinations, and procuring livestock feed and protein supplements [38,40]. The communication of this information must be pertinent [41], taking into consideration language, regional specificity, and temporal scales [20,42,43].
Numerous studies in the Limpopo Province have focused on climate mitigation and adaptation [31,39,44,45,46] and climatic trends [27,47,48,49,50], but few have concentrated on the implications of climate variability on rangeland productivity. Subsequently, this study employs a statistical analysis to examine climate variability and its implications for rangeland productivity. The main objective of the study is to assess spatial and temporal changes in seasonal rainfall and temperature trends over the study period, investigating the hypothesis that the Limpopo Province has undergone climate variability during this time. The second objective is to provide implications for rangeland productivity based on the results. The findings are anticipated to contribute to predicting future trends in these climate variables and quantifying extreme events, encompassing exceptionally hot or cold temperatures, as well as exceedingly wet or dry conditions.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Site Description

The Limpopo Province is situated in the northeastern part of South Africa, spanning the geographic coordinates of 22° to 25° S latitude and 26° to 32° E longitude (Figure 1). This region is a significant component of the semi-arid savanna biome, comprising the bushveld, dry woodlands, and grasslands [51,52]. The topography of Limpopo Province varies from mountainous terrain (escarpment) to flatlands (Lowveld), with elevations ranging from below 400 m to over 1500 m above sea level. The diverse topography significantly influences the distribution of vegetation in this area [53]. The local economy is bolstered by mining, tourism, and agriculture as key sectors [54]; however, a high unemployment rate (49%) persists, particularly in rural areas [55].

2.2. Climate and Agricultural Activities

The climate in the Limpopo Province is characterized by a transition from warm desert (BWh) to warm semi-arid (BSh) and humid subtropical (Cwa) conditions based on the Köppen climate classification. Summers (December through February; DJF) are characterized by hot days and nights, with mean maximum temperatures reaching approximately 28 °C [48]. In contrast, winters (June through August; JJA) experience milder conditions with mean minimum temperatures of approximately 18 °C [48,56]. Rainfall patterns vary annually, resulting in a diverse range of vegetation across the province. Rainfall primarily occurs from October to April, with annual mean precipitation levels ranging from less than 350 mm in low-lying areas to over 1000 mm in mountainous regions. The primary source of rainfall in this region is convective systems [57]. However, recent decades have witnessed increased climate variability, leading to unreliable rainfall and recurrent droughts that have had severe impacts on agriculture and water resources [10]. Overpopulation, overgrazing, and rainfall variability have resulted in extensive land degradation in the northeastern parts of the province [31,58,59].
Agriculture plays a crucial role in the regional economy, with extensive livestock activities and ranching operations contributing significantly [60]. Approximately 75% of the natural vegetation is attributed to grazing lands, with the remaining 25% designated for various land uses, primarily commercial and small-scale farming activities [61]. Rain-fed subsistence farming is widely practiced by rural households, making them more prone to climate variability and change [23]. Commercial agriculture is mainly centralized in the southern and western regions of the province. The main soil types found in the region include sandy, loamy, and clay soils [62,63]. Key crops cultivated in Limpopo include tropical fruits, cereals, and vegetables, while livestock farming predominantly involves cattle, goats, and chickens [44].

3. Data and Methods

3.1. Data and Quality Control

The climate data utilized in this study were acquired from the Agricultural Research Council climate databank [64]. The dataset encompassed a 30-year span (1979/80–2017/18) of daily temperature and rainfall records. Rainfall and temperature are important parameters for determining climate variability in agricultural production systems [65]. A total of 15 stations, situated in different agroecological zones such as arid, semi-arid, and sub-humid, were chosen to provide comprehensive climate information, including minimum and maximum temperature as well as rainfall (Table 1). The selection of these stations followed the standards set by the World Meteorological Organization (WMO), which mandates a minimum data duration of 30 years and relatively complete data for climatological studies. A rigorous examination of the data was undertaken to identify inconsistencies and errors, leading to the removal of faulty values. Any gaps in the data were addressed using the ARC Stand-Alone Data Patch function, which utilizes the Inverse Distance Weighting method with neighbouring stations [64,66]. The weather station data were quantified through comparison with hourly field ERA5-Land climate reanalysis data [67]. This comparison not only enhances the scientific robustness of the dataset but also facilitates a comprehensive evaluation of its accuracy and reliability.

3.2. Data Analysis

Climate data were collected and averaged annually and seasonally to determine minimum and maximum temperatures across the four seasons. Rainfall data were similarly compiled into annual and seasonal totals for the four seasons: summer (DJF), autumn (March through May; MAM), winter (JJA), and spring (September through November; SON). Linear regression was employed to illustrate inter-annual variability, focusing on the monthly, seasonal, and annual trends. The resulting time-series graphs were examined to evaluate climate variability. Various tests were employed to analyse climate parameters over the study period. To address the primary objective, statistical measures such as mean, standard deviation, and coefficient of variation [7,8,68,69] were calculated to assess both the annual and seasonal variability of rainfall, as well as minimum and maximum temperatures, spatially and temporally.

3.2.1. Coefficient of Variation (CV)

The coefficient of variation (CV) was employed to evaluate the extent of seasonal and annual variability during the observation period. This study utilized the following categories outlined by [70] for the coefficient of variation: (1) high variability (CV > 30), (2) moderate (20 < CV < 30), and (3) low (CV < 20) (Table 2, Table 3, Table 4 and Table 5). A higher CV value indicates greater climatic variability within the study area, while a lower value signifies reduced variability. The CV is computed using the following equation:
CV = σ/μ × 100
where CV represents the coefficient of variation, σ is the standard deviation, and μ is the mean recorded.

3.2.2. Trend Detection

Trend detection was performed through a time-series analysis and the Mann–Kendall test. The time series encompassed total seasonal rainfall and mean seasonal minimum and maximum temperatures (Figure 2, Figure 3 and Figure 4). To identify climatic trends in the time-series data, the Mann–Kendall test [1,7,8,65,71,72,73] was utilized at a significance level of p <  0.01, <0.05, and <0.10 (Table 6, Table 7 and Table 8). The process included detecting increasing and decreasing slopes of trends in rainfall and temperature data. To ensure accurate trend analysis, the data records spanned approximately 38 years, adhering to [74] guidelines that stipulate a minimum of 30 years’ worth of data for precise climatic trend assessments.
The Mann–Kendall test, a non-parametric method for identifying trends in data, was adopted to evaluate trends and their significance in this study. The World Meteorological Organization has endorsed this test as suitable for assessing trends in environmental-data time series [75], as it does not necessitate a normal distribution of data [76]. The test involves comparing each value of the time series with the others in sequence. The sum of these comparisons is represented by the S statistic:
S = i = 2 n   j = 1 i 1   s i g n x i x j ,  
where s i g n x i x j is
1   f o r   x i x j < 0 ,
0   f o r   x i x j = 0 ,
1   f o r   x i x j > 0 ,
For large n, the S statistic tends to normality, with definitions for mean and variance shown below:
E(S) = 0
V a r S = 1 18 n n 1 2 n + 5 p = 1 q t p ( t p 1 ) ( 2 t p + 5 )   ,
where the time-series length is shown by n, the pth value’s number of ties is shown by tp, and the number of tied values is shown by q. Subsequently, an adjustment of tied data is given by the second term. The Z statistic is given by:
Ζ = S 1   V a r ( S )                   i f   S > 0 ,             0                                 i f   S = 0 , S 1 V a r ( S )               i f   S < 0 .
The presence of a statistically significant trend is determined using the Z value. The null hypothesis is evaluated by the Z statistic in a case where there is no trend. A positive (negative) value shows an increasing (decreasing) trend in the time series. To test whether a monotonic trend is increasing or decreasing at a p-significance level, the null hypothesis is rejected at an absolute value of z greater than Z1 p = 2. This study considered a p-value of 0.01, 0.05, and 0.10.
β = Median ( X j   X i ( j i )   for   all   i < j
where j and i are measured by the slope between data points Xj and Xi, respectively.

4. Results

4.1. Inter-Annual Variability of Climatic Variables

Table 2 presents the coefficient of variation results for total rainfall, as well as minimum and maximum temperatures in the selected stations in the Limpopo Province spanning from 1980 to 2018. The mean and standard deviation (SD) results are available in Appendix A (Table A1).
Throughout the study period, rainfall displayed a combination of moderate (46.6% of the stations) and high (53.3% of the stations) CVs. The Tshiombo station displayed the highest CV at 62.8%, with an average of 1003.0 mm and an SD of 630.5 mm.
Minimum temperatures consistently displayed low CVs across all stations during the study period. The lowest CV of 2.6% was observed at the Tshiombo station, with an average temperature of 15.1 °C and an SD of 0.4 °C.
Similarly, all stations exhibited low CVs for maximum temperatures. The Tshiombo station recorded the lowest CV of 2.6%, with an average temperature of 27.3 °C and an SD of 0.7 °C.

4.2. Inter-Annual Variability of Seasonal Rainfall

Figure 2 illustrates the inter-annual variability observed in the total seasonal rainfall across all four seasons, while Table 3 presents the coefficient of variation with its category for total seasonal rainfall for the four seasons during the period from 1980 to 2018. The mean (mm) and standard deviation (SD) can be viewed in Appendix A (Table A2).
During the DJF season, all stations exhibited a notably high CV, with the Musina station recording the highest CV at 71.2%. The mean rainfall for this season at Musina was 193.9 mm, with a standard deviation of 138.0 mm. Similarly, during the MAM season, high CV values were observed at all stations, with the Musina station again recording the highest CV at 83.5%. The mean rainfall for the MAM season at Musina was 65.6 mm, with a standard deviation of 54.8 mm.
The JJA season also witnessed a high CV at all stations, with the Punda Maria station registering the highest CV at 366%. For this season, the mean rainfall at Punda Maria was 39.4 mm, with a standard deviation of 144.1 mm. Lastly, during the SON season, all stations exhibited a high CV. The Tshiombo station had the highest CV at 88.3%, with a mean rainfall of 216.1 mm and a standard deviation of 190.7 mm.

4.3. Inter-Annual Variability of Minimum Temperatures

Figure 3 illustrates the inter-annual variability observed in the analysis of mean minimum temperatures across all four seasons. Table 4 provides the coefficient of variation with its category for mean minimum temperatures during the four seasons during the period from 1980 to 2018. The mean (°C) and standard deviation (SD) can be viewed from Appendix A (Table A3).
During the DJF season, all the stations exhibited low CV values, with the lowest CV recorded at 2.6% in the Tshiombo station. At Tshiombo, the mean minimum temperature during DJF was 19.3 °C, with a standard deviation of 0.5 °C. Similarly, during the MAM season, low CV values were observed across all stations, with the lowest CV of 5.0% documented at the Phalaborwa station (mean temperature of 16.1 °C and a standard deviation of 0.8 °C).
In the JJA season, 10 stations displayed low CV values, with the Tshiombo station recording the lowest CV at 7.0%. The mean minimum temperature at Tshiombo during JJA was 10.0 °C, with a standard deviation of 0.7 °C. However, moderate CV values were observed in four stations: Thabazimbi, Sentrum-ysterpan, Settlers, and Zebediela, with CVs of 28.9%, 24.0%, 28.6%, and 23.0%, respectively. A higher CV of 32.5% was noted at the Roedtan station, where the mean minimum temperature was 4.0 °C, and the standard deviation was 1.3 °C.
Finally, during the SON season, all stations exhibited low CV values, with the lowest CV at 3.7% observed at the Phalaborwa station. At Phalaborwa, the mean minimum temperature during SON was 16.6 °C, with a standard deviation of 0.6 °C.

4.4. Inter-Annual Variability of Maximum Temperatures

Figure 4 presents the inter-annual variability observed in the analysis of mean maximum temperatures across all four seasons. Table 5 provides the coefficient of variation with its category for mean maximum temperatures for the four seasons during the period spanning from 1980 to 2018. The mean (°C) and standard deviation (SD) can be viewed from Appendix A (Table A4).
Throughout the DJF season, all the stations exhibited notably low CV values, with the lowest CV recorded at 3.3% in the Fleur-de-lys station. This particular station had a mean maximum temperature of 29 °C, with a standard deviation of 1.0 °C. Similarly, during the MAM season, low CV values were consistently observed across all stations, with the Bavaria station recording the lowest CV at 3.5%. At Bavaria, the mean maximum temperature for the MAM season was 28.3 °C, and the standard deviation was 1.0 °C.
In the JJA season, all the stations displayed low CV values as well, with the Tshiombo station recording the lowest CV at 3.3%. The mean maximum temperature at Tshiombo during the JJA season was 24.0 °C, and the standard deviation was 0.8 °C. Finally, during the SON season, all stations exhibited low CV values, with the Bavaria station again recording the lowest CV at 3.4%. At Bavaria, the mean maximum temperature for the SON season was 28.8 °C, with a standard deviation of 1.0 °C.

4.5. Trend Analysis for Total Seasonal Rainfall

Table 6 shows the total seasonal rainfall data for the four distinct seasons. Within the DJF season, ten stations experienced an increasing trend, while five stations experienced a decreasing trend. The increasing trend is statistically significant for only four stations, specifically Thabazimbi, Sentrum-ysterpan, Shingwedzi, and Musina. However, the decreasing trend is significant for only two stations, specifically Roedtan and Lephalale. The rest of the results are available in Appendix B (Table A5).
In the MAM season, 12 stations indicate an increasing trend, but statistical significance is only observed for the Punda Maria station. Conversely, a decreasing trend is noted in three stations.
During the JJA season, four stations experienced an increasing trend, while eleven stations exhibited a declining trend. Among these, statistical significance is found in two stations, namely Thabazimbi and Sentrum-ysterpan.
In the SON season, eight stations experienced an increasing trend, while seven stations experienced a decreasing trend. The decreasing trend is statistically significant solely for the Modjadji station.

4.6. Trend Analysis for Mean Minimum Temperature

Table 7 presents data indicating an increasing trend during the DJF season at five stations. However, this trend is statistically significant for only one station, Lephalale. Conversely, a declining trend is observed at ten stations, with statistical significance identified in five of them: Roedtan, Fleur-de-lys, Shingwedzi, Musina, and Tshiombo. The rest of the results are available in Appendix B (Table A6).
In the MAM season, an increasing trend is noticed at six stations, out of which only three (Thabazimbi, Sentrum-ysterpan, and Lephalale) demonstrate statistical significance. Conversely, a decreasing trend is observed at nine stations, with five of them demonstrating statistical significance: Shingwedzi, Punda Maria, Musina, Tshiombo, and Zebediela.
During the JJA season, an increasing trend is noted at seven stations. Statistical significance is found for the Thabazimbi, Sentrum-ysterpan, and Lephalale stations. Conversely, a decreasing trend is observed at eight stations, with only five of them displaying statistical significance: Roedtan, Phalaborwa, Marnitz, Punda Maria, and Zebediela.
Finally, during the SON season, an upward trend is observed in eight stations, with three of them (Sentrum-ysterpan, Modjadji, and Lephalale) being statistically significant. Conversely, a declining trend is observed at seven stations.

4.7. Trend Analysis for Mean Maximum Temperature

Table 8 shows an increasing trend in mean maximum temperatures during the DJF season at eleven stations, while a decreasing trend is noted at four stations. Statistically significant trends are observed in seven stations, specifically Roedtan, Sentrum-ysterpan, Modjadji, Phalaborwa, Marnitz, Settlers, and Zebediela. Additionally, Shingwedzi exhibits a statistically significant decreasing trend. The rest of the results are available in Appendix B (Table A7).
In the MAM season, an increasing trend is evident at 12 stations. Statistically significant trends are observed in nine stations, namely Roedtan, Sentrum-ysterpan, Modjadji, Phalaborwa, Marnitz, Musina, Settlers, Zebediela, and Lephalale. Conversely, a decreasing trend is observed at three stations.
In the JJA season, an increasing trend is observed in 14 stations. Statistically significant trends are observed in 12 stations, namely Roedtan, Sentrum-ysterpan, Modjadji, Phalaborwa, Marnitz, Punda Maria, Musina, Tshiombo, Settlers, Zebediela, Bavaria, and Lephalale. Conversely, a decreasing trend is observed at one station.
Finally, an increasing trend is observed in mean maximum temperatures for 13 stations during the SON season, with statistically significant trends in 12 stations, specifically Roedtan, Sentrum-ysterpan, Modjadji, Phalaborwa, Marnitz, Punda Maria, Musina, Tshiombo, Settlers, Zebediela, Bavaria, and Lephalale. Conversely, a decreasing trend is observed at two stations.

5. Discussion

The primary objective of this study was to investigate climate variability in the Limpopo Province by employing various statistical methods. The statistical analyses included calculating the mean, standard deviation, and coefficient of variation, and conducting the Mann–Kendall test with significance levels of p < 0.01, p < 0.05, or p < 0.10.
The findings of the time-series analysis for the long-term mean for rainfall throughout the study period indicate a combination of moderate and high CVs in rainfall over the study period. Notably, the Tshiombo station exhibited the highest CV of 62.8%, suggesting a degree of unpredictability in rainfall patterns in the Limpopo Province, specifically in the Tshiombo region.
On the other hand, the long-term mean for minimum temperatures displayed consistently low variability, particularly at the Tshiombo station with the lowest CV of 2.6%. This implies a higher level of predictability in minimum temperatures, specifically in the Tshiombo region.
Similarly, the long-term mean for maximum temperatures exhibited low variability across all stations, with the Tshiombo station again recording the lowest CV (2.6%). This reinforces the notion of relatively predictable maximum temperatures in the Tshiombo region.
The results of the time-series analysis revealed a consistently high coefficient of variation (CV) for seasonal rainfall across all stations and seasons. These findings highlight the highly variable and unreliable nature of rainfall in the region [31,77]. Notably, the DJF and SON seasons receive the highest rainfall in the Limpopo Province as the region receives spring and summer rainfall due to convective systems [58]. This rainfall variability significantly impacts livestock production and vegetation growth [31] in the area, which can affect the carrying capacity of rangelands. High-rainfall years enhance rangeland quality and water availability, positively affecting livestock production [31]. Conversely, low-rainfall years lead to a scarcity of quality forage and water, resulting in poor livestock production and increased mortality rates [31,38].
Mean minimum temperatures displayed a low CV during the DJF season for all stations. In contrast, during the JJA season, 66.7% of stations recorded a low CV, 26.7% of stations showed a moderate CV, and 6.6% of stations recorded a high CV. For the SON season, all stations displayed a low CV. The results concerning minimum and maximum temperatures indicate that these parameters are relatively less variable, compared to rainfall, across the four seasons.
Maximum temperatures displayed a low CV during all the seasons considered in all the stations. The highest mean maximum temperatures are observed in the DJF season [30]. Furthermore, mean maximum temperatures are generally increasing in the Limpopo Province, although variations exist among different areas. These findings are corroborated by previous studies [30,50,78]. The temperature variations can be attributed to factors such as elevation, as mountainous regions experience lower temperatures compared to other areas in the Lowveld.
The Mann–Kendall trend analysis exhibited both increasing and decreasing patterns in mean minimum temperatures, with some statistically significant trends observed (at p < 0.01, p < 0.05, or p < 0.10). Furthermore, both increasing and decreasing trends in minimum temperatures were observed across various stations in the province and different seasons, making the trends inconclusive. These results align with a study that also reported inconclusive findings for minimum temperatures in the region [48]. Recent findings from southern African countries indicated a rise in both minimum and maximum temperatures, but minimum temperatures exhibited greater variability [79].
Regarding mean maximum temperatures, there were notable increasing trends across all seasons, with statistical significance. Specifically, during the DJF season, 46.67% of stations exhibited increasing trends, while during the MAM season, this figure was 60%. Both the JJA and SON seasons saw 80% of stations with increasing trends. Therefore, the highest increase in temperatures was observed in winter and spring. These findings are consistent with results from another study that showed a significant increase in maximum temperatures [46,48,80]. Additional research conducted in Punjab, Pakistan, also identified rising trends in both minimum and maximum temperatures, though minimum trends displayed greater variation than maximum temperatures [62].
In terms of total seasonal rainfall, no significant trend was observed. This finding corresponds with earlier studies that also reported high variations in rainfall over the Limpopo Province [27,49,50,81,82]. Similar variability in inter-annual rainfall was noted in studies conducted in Ethiopia and India [8,69]. In contrast, a study found a decreasing trend in rainfall in the Olifants catchment of South Africa [46]. Prior research has illustrated the detrimental impacts of high temperatures combined with unreliable rainfall on agricultural production [22,25,31,46,62]. For instance, extreme temperatures and unreliable rainfall can negatively affect vegetation growth, thereby influencing livestock production [4,6,38,80,83,84,85].

6. Implications for Rangelands

6.1. Varying Rainfall

Findings in this study show fluctuations across different stations and seasons in rainfall, with some stations showing increasing trends while others show a decreasing trend. Rainfall patterns play a crucial role in determining the quality and quantity of forage available in rangelands [59,82,85]. Therefore, this implies that fluctuations in rainfall can have a profound impact on forage resources, especially for rain-fed rangelands in the Limpopo Province, and this is corroborated by other studies [80,86].
Periods of low rainfall mean that vegetation growth will decline, leading to a reduction in the carrying capacity of rangelands for grazing livestock. During periods of low rainfall coupled with high temperatures, high evapotranspiration rates in the Limpopo Province will have negative impacts on soil moisture, pasture growth, and livestock as drinking water will also be reduced [86,87].
Decisions that will have to be made include regulating grazing routines and monitoring stocking rates to prevent overgrazing and mortality of livestock. Common practices such as storing hay for feed and buying supplements will be enforced.
In the semi-arid rangelands of southern Africa, reduced production is typically attributed to unreliable rainfall [31,83,88,89] and diminished soil moisture levels [90]. Moreover, reduced vegetation cover due to insufficient rainfall can make rangelands susceptible to wind and soil erosion, potentially leading to long-term decreases in soil fertility and overall soil degradation [83,91,92,93,94]. Thus, land degradation in many regions of the Limpopo Province can be seen as a result of unreliable rainfall and anthropogenic causes.
Conversely, high levels of rainfall have been observed to result in abundant grass biomass in the rangelands of the Limpopo Province [40]. This implies that there will be ample pasture for grazing, and livestock will obtain ample pasture and drinking water. However, high rainfalls also imply that decision-makers will need to plan for the coming seasons by conserving feed and water through traditional methods such as storing hay for feed and in-field rainwater harvesting, both to conserve soil moisture for grass and drinking water.

6.2. Varying Minimum Temperatures

The findings for minimum temperatures show both increasing and decreasing trends across different stations and seasons. A rise in minimum temperatures can disrupt plant growth by interfering with the length of growing period, development stages, and their timing [79,95]. This implies that there will be food shortages caused by the low yields of grass biomass. Warmer temperatures observed in some stations will shorten the dormancy period, which can have repercussions on the availability and quality of forage resources in the rangelands [84]. This implies that both the quantity and quality of forage available in the rangelands of the Limpopo Province for livestock grazing may decrease. This will, therefore, affect the decisions taken regarding grazing, and practices such as rotational grazing may be employed to ensure that livestock obtain pasture.
Variations in minimum temperatures can also influence the distribution of plant species, potentially altering their palatability, and this will indirectly impact livestock [25]. This implies that certain parts of the rangelands may be grazed more than others due to palatability. However, it is important to note that pasture availability experiences seasonal fluctuations and is influenced by multiple factors, including grazing intensity, grassland management, precipitation, temperature conditions, and the prevailing species of pasture [79,96]. Hot (cold) temperatures during summer (winter) seasons can result in livestock pests and diseases and mortality for livestock [38]. During these extreme seasons, decisions to control potential pest outbreaks and impacts will be taken.

6.3. Increasing Maximum Temperatures

High maximum temperatures, particularly during the SON and DJF seasons, as observed in the findings, can lead to reduced forage and water availability in the rangelands due to heat stress [79]. This shows that heat stress can adversely affect the palatability and nutritional value of available forage for livestock [86]. Additionally, livestock grazing patterns may be altered by high temperatures, as livestock may prefer to graze in shaded areas rather than open pastures [97]. This implies that potential overgrazing in certain areas may result, while others may be underutilized, affecting livestock’s ability to find sufficient grazing resources, which is prevalent in the northeastern rangelands of the Limpopo Province.
Other implications of high temperatures coupled with low rainfall include the flammability of vegetation, which may result from high fire frequency [28]. This will result in changes in species composition. Decisions that regulate wildfires and the construction of firebreaks will have to be enforced.
High temperatures, as observed in the findings, particularly in the SON and DJF seasons, can induce heat stress in cattle, goats, and sheep, impacting their productivity [79,86]. This implies that various physiological processes, including milk production in dairy cows, dry matter and water intake, and mating, can be affected by heat stress [38,84]. Moreover, this may have potential impacts on the prevalence of pests and diseases, significantly affecting livestock and, in some instances, resulting in illness and mortality [38,84]. Livestock illness and mortality will have a significant impact on the local economy, as some farmers will face a loss of income due to the mortality of their livestock. Consequently, there is a need for policies addressing pest and disease regulation, along with initiatives targeting livestock infestations, to mitigate these challenges and provide relief for affected farmers.

7. Conclusions

The study conducted a comprehensive analysis of long-term climate variability within the Limpopo Province over 38 years, focusing on rainfall and temperature data across different seasons. The main objective was to analyse climate variability (spatial and temporal), considering rainfall and minimum and maximum temperatures. The findings informed implications for rangeland productivity. The results highlighted significant fluctuations in rainfall across all stations, with the highest variability observed in the Punda Maria station during the June–July–August (JJA; 366%) season. Moreover, during the rainfall season, September–October–November (SON) and December–January–February (DJF), the highest variability was observed in Musina (71.2%) and Tshiombo (88.3%). Minimum temperatures showed relatively low variability, with the lowest variability observed during the DJF season in the Tshiombo station (2.6%), while maximum temperatures exhibited consistently low variability, with the lowest variability of 3.4% observed during the DJF and JJA seasons in Fleur-de-lys and Tshiombo. This indicates that there is more significant variability in rainfall when contrasted with temperature, and the observed variability varies seasonally.
Trends in minimum temperatures and rainfall were inconclusive, with both increasing and decreasing patterns observed. Conversely, there was a statistically significant increase in mean maximum temperatures across all seasons. However, the highest increase in maximum temperatures was observed in the JJA and SON seasons, with 80% of stations experiencing increasing trends. This emphasizes that Limpopo Province has experienced climate variability during the study period.
Climate variability findings for a rain-fed region can be used to guide on-farm decisions that can improve productivity in rangelands. Additionally, these findings caninform policy and prompt a reevaluation of existing policies in light of the new information. The findings are further expected to aid in forecasting future patterns of these climate variables and assessing extreme events in the region. It is advised that local farmers, extension officers, meteorologists and researchers work closely to monitor temperature and rainfall forecasting for future years.
Overall, this study effectively examined climate variability in the Limpopo Province and outlined the implications for rangelands. Moreover, further research is needed to explore the underlying mechanisms driving climate variability and to quantify the intricate interplay between climate variability and livestock herd dynamics, considering short- and long-term impacts.

Author Contributions

P.M. was responsible for the conceptualization, methodology, and formal analysis. P.M. also drafted the manuscript. M.E.M. and M.T. contributed to the restructuring, editing, and revising of the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Water Research Commission: project no. K5/2968//4.

Data Availability Statement

The climate data used in this study were acquired from the Agricultural Research Council, and the availability is subject to specific data policies. Interested parties can access this data by making a direct request to the Agricultural Research Council.

Acknowledgments

This study is based upon work fully supported financially by the Water Research Commission: project no. K5/2968//4—Development of an agricultural drought management framework for South African croplands and grasslands. The authors express their gratitude to Thomas Fyfield (ARC-NRE) for his editorial assistance in refining and enhancing the readability of the manuscript. The authors also acknowledge the reviewers whose feedback played a crucial role in clarifying and enhancing the quality of the manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Appendix A

Table A1. Summary of statistics for climatic variables for selected weather stations in the Limpopo Province (1980–2018).
Table A1. Summary of statistics for climatic variables for selected weather stations in the Limpopo Province (1980–2018).
Station Name Rainfall Minimum
Temperature
Maximum
Temperature
Mean
(mm)
SD
(mm)
CV
(%)
CV
Category
Mean
(°C)
SD
(°C)
CV
(%)
CV
Category
Mean
(°C)
SD
(°C)
CV
(%)
CV
Category
Thabazimbi630.3170.127.0Moderate11.50.76.1Low27.71.34.8 Low
Roedtan530.6156.229.4Moderate11.60.65.6Low28.21.24.2Low
Fleur-de-lys722.2210.829.2Moderate14.40.74.8Low27.60.82.9Low
Sentrum-ysterpan561.7145.525.9Moderate12.10.97.4Low26.41.24.5Low
Modjadji 718.4256.235.7High14.21.07.3Low27.21.86.6Low
Phalaborwa 461.5177.038.4High15.80.53.1Low29.61.03.3Low
Marnitz445.4143.932.3High13.90.96.4Low29.21.86.1Low
Shingwedzi532.6225.942.4High15.60.63.8Low29.71.44.7Low
Punda maria565.9336.159.4High16.00.95.6Low29.11.44.8Low
Musina358.0148.741.5High15.40.63.9Low30.41.34.3Low
Tshiombo1003.0630.562.8High15.10.42.6Low27.30.72.6Low
Settlers648.3135.320.9Moderate10.90.76.4Low28.01.24.2Low
Zebediela560.5123.722.6Moderate13.10.86.1Low27.41.03.6Low
Bavaria 576.7169.929.5Moderate15.00.74.7Low28.20.82.8Low
Lephalale445.8181.640.7High13.11.29.1Low28.71.03.5Low
Table A2. Statistical results for total seasonal rainfall for the December–January–February (DJF), March–April–May (MAM), June–July–August (JJA), and September–October–November (SON) seasons in the selected stations in the Limpopo Province (1980–2018).
Table A2. Statistical results for total seasonal rainfall for the December–January–February (DJF), March–April–May (MAM), June–July–August (JJA), and September–October–November (SON) seasons in the selected stations in the Limpopo Province (1980–2018).
Station NameDJF MAM JJA SON
Mean
(mm)
SD
(mm)
CV
(%)
CV
Category
Mean
(mm)
SD
(mm)
CV
(%)
CV
Category
Mean
(mm)
SD
(mm)
CV
(%)
CV
Category
Mean
(mm)
SD
(mm)
CV
(%)
CV
Category
Thabazimbi260.0170.365.5High141.661.943.7High98.1116.5118.8High134.158.143.4High
Roedtan241.7102.042.2High103.666.464.1High20.861.8297.3High160.685.453.2High
Fleur-de-lys374.7159.842.7High152.864.242.0High30.932.5105.4High162.368.642.2High
Sentrum-ysterpan237.0160.967.9High131.060.746.4High77.0101.5131.8High119.842.335.3High
Modjadji 387.6225.458.2High147.681.155.0High21.018.186.2High151.662.341.1High
Phalaborwa 238.7124.252.0High90.745.149.7High15.416.7108.4High114.560.452.7High
Marnitz238.4107.845.2High80.844.955.6High12.114.8122.9High107.959.354.9High
Shingwedzi299.5190.763.7High97.568.670.4High16.413.884.1High121.263.952.7High
Punda maria308.0214.169.5High93.972.577.2High39.4144.1366.1High124.273.959.5High
Musina193.9138.071.2High65.654.883.5High9.415.2161.7High88.850.056.3High
Tshiombo505.9290.157.3High199.4154.177.3High78.5248.1316.1High216.1190.788.2High
Settlers328.9115.035.0High128.080.462.8High13.214.9112.8High177.269.439.2High
Zebediela280.491.632.7High102.357.956.6High11.715.3130.7High157.470.744.9High
Bavaria 295.8125.442.4High119.351.243.0High15.217.0111.8High145.370.848.7High
Lephalale211.3119.156.3High86.458.167.3High28.267.6239.8High111.769.562.2High
Table A3. Statistical results for mean minimum temperature for the December–January–February (DJF), March–April–May (MAM), June–July–August (JJA), and September–October–November (SON) seasons in the selected stations in the Limpopo Province (1980–2018).
Table A3. Statistical results for mean minimum temperature for the December–January–February (DJF), March–April–May (MAM), June–July–August (JJA), and September–October–November (SON) seasons in the selected stations in the Limpopo Province (1980–2018).
Station NameDJF MAM JJA SON
Mean
(°C)
SD
(°C)
CV
(%)
CV
Category
Mean
(°C)
SD
(°C)
CV
(%)
CV
Category
Mean
(°C)
SD
(°C)
CV
(%)
CV
Category
Mean
(°C)
SD
(°C)
CV
(%)
CV
Category
Thabazimbi17.40.84.5Low11.21.09.1Low3.91.128.9Moderate13.41.07.8Low
Roedtan17.40.74.2Low11.40.98.0Low4.01.332.5High13.51.07.4Low
Fleur-de-lys18.91.05.3Low14.70.96.1Low8.80.910.2Low15.20.85.2Low
Sentrum-ysterpan17.60.84.5Low11.91.512.6 Low5.01.224.0Moderate14.01.39.2Low
Modjadji 18.02.011.2Low14.51.510.3Low9.51.414.7Low14.61.510.2Low
Phalaborwa 20.50.73.4Low16.10.85.0Low9.80.99.2Low16.60.63.7Low
Marnitz18.91.05.3Low13.71.28.8Low7.31.216.4Low15.81.38.2Low
Shingwedzi20.61.15.3Low15.71.17.0Low9.20.99.8Low16.71.16.6Low
Punda maria20.50.83.9Low16.21.38.0Low10.41.615.3Low16.90.95.3Low
Musina21.10.83.8Low15.51.06.5Low8.00.911.3Low17.10.74.1Low
Tshiombo19.30.52.6Low15.30.85.2Low10.00.77.0Low15.80.63.8Low
Settlers16.70.63.6Low10.60.87.5Low3.51.028.6Moderate12.81.07.8Low
Zebediela18.00.63.3Low13.11.18.4Low6.61.523.0Moderate14.80.96.0Low
Bavaria 19.41.05.2Low15.21.06.6Low9.41.213.1Low15.70.85.1Low
Lephalale18.71.58.0Low12.81.410.9Low5.81.220.8Low15.21.811.8Low
Table A4. Statistical results for mean maximum temperature for the December–January–February (DJF), March–April–May (MAM), June–July–August (JJA), and September–October–November (SON) seasons in the selected stations in the Limpopo Province (1980–2018).
Table A4. Statistical results for mean maximum temperature for the December–January–February (DJF), March–April–May (MAM), June–July–August (JJA), and September–October–November (SON) seasons in the selected stations in the Limpopo Province (1980–2018).
Station NameDJF MAM JJA SON
Mean
(°C)
SD
(°C)
CV
(%)
CV
Category
Mean
(°C)
SD
(°C)
CV
(%)
CV
Category
Mean
(°C)
SD
(°C)
CV
(%)
CV
Category
Mean
(°C)
SD
(°C)
CV
(%)
CV
Category
Thabazimbi30.71.75.7Low27.22.07.4Low23.11.35.8Low29.71.34.5Low
Roedtan31.11.44.6Low27.81.34.8Low23.71.35.5Low29.91.55.2Low
Fleur-de-lys29.11.03.3Low25.91.03.7Low25.60.93.4Low28.91.13.9Low
Sentrum-ysterpan28.71.45.0Low26.31.45.3Low23.31.25.0Low27.21.45.2Low
Modjadji 29.62.17.0Low27.22.17.7Low24.11.97.8Low27.92.17.5Low
Phalaborwa 32.31.13.5Low29.61.44.7Low26.21.14.3Low30.21.23.8Low
Marnitz30.82.16.8Low26.51.86.9Low26.71.86.7Low31.51.96.0Low
Shingwedzi30.91.96.1Low27.81.76.3Low27.71.34.7Low31.51.75.5Low
Punda maria31.42.89.0Low28.82.58.6Low25.71.14.4Low30.21.65.2Low
Musina31.71.95.9Low28.01.55.3Low27.91.34.6Low32.71.44.3Low
Tshiombo29.51.34.4Low27.01.24.4Low24.00.83.3Low28.41.03.5Low
Settlers30.81.65.2Low27.51.55.4Low23.51.25.1Low30.11.54.9Low
Zebediela30.21.34.3Low27.11.14.0Low23.01.14.8Low29.21.24.1Low
Bavaria 30.91.23.8Low28.31.03.5Low25.00.93.6Low28.81.03.4Low
Lephalale31.61.44.4Low28.21.44.9Low24.41.14.5Low30.61.34.2Low

Appendix B

Table A5. Mann–Kendall test results for total seasonal rainfall for the December–January–February (DJF), March–April–May (MAM), June–July–August (JJA), and September–October–November (SON) seasons in the selected stations in the Limpopo Province (1980–2018).
Table A5. Mann–Kendall test results for total seasonal rainfall for the December–January–February (DJF), March–April–May (MAM), June–July–August (JJA), and September–October–November (SON) seasons in the selected stations in the Limpopo Province (1980–2018).
StationDJF MAM JJA SON
SVar(S)p-Valuez SVar(S)p-Valuez SVar(S)p-Valuez SVar(S)p-Valuez
Thabazimbi283.0006327.00.000392 ***3.545I39.0006327.00.63280.4777I−318.06324.00.000067 ***−3.986D105.06327.00.19111.3075I
Roedtan−221.0006327.00.005678 ***−2.7658D87.0006327.00.27961.0812I121.06201.00.12751.5239I−91.006327.00.2579−1.131D
Fleur-de-lys119.00006327.00.13791.4835I80.000006326.00.32060.9932I−58.006326.00.4736−0.7166D49.006327.00.54620.6034I
Sentrum-ysterpan301.00006327.00.000162 ***3.7716I7.0000006327.00.93990.0754I−232.06298.60.0036 ***−2.9106D89.006327.00.26861.1063I
Modjadji −5.00006327.00.9599−0.0502D−19.0006327.00.821−0.2262D−128.06326.00.1103−1.5968D−163.06325.00.0416 **−2.037D
Phalaborwa −2.000006326.00.99−0.0125D3.00006327.00.97990.0251I−131.06325.00.1021−1.6346D−56.006326.000.4892−0.6915D
Marnitz95.000006327.00.23731.1818I−16.00006326.00.8504−0.1885D10.006294.00.90970.1134I30.006326.00.71540.364I
Shingwedzi157.00006327.00.04985 **1.9612I99.000006327.00.21791.232I9.0006325.00.91990.1005I98.006326.00.22261.2196I
Punda maria123.00006327.00.12511.5338I155.00006327.00.05286 *1.9361I93.006325.00.24741.1568I−27.006327.00.7438−0.3268D
Musina149.00006327.00.06279 *1.8606I21.000006325.00.80140.2514I−16.006258.60.8496−0.1896D−31.006327.00.7061−0.3771D
Tshiombo85.000006327.00.29091.056I95.000006327.00.23731.1818I−48.006326.00.5546−0.5909D7.0006327.00.93990.0754I
Settlers17.000006327.00.84060.2011I91.000006327.00.25791.1315I−44.006309.30.5883−0.5413D9.0006327.00.91990.1005I
Zebediela−47.00006327.00.5631−0.5783D67.00000 6327.00.40670.8297I−34.006309.30.6778−0.4154D63.006327.0 0.43570.7794I
Bavaria 71.00006327.00.37880.8800I 76.00006326.00.34570.9429I−39.006325.00.6328−0.4778D13.006327.00.88010.1508D
Lephalale−200.0006317.30.01229 *−2.5037D−120.0006326.00.1346−1.4962D−9.0006295.60.9197−0.1008D−84.006323.30.2966−1.0438D
*** Trends statistically significant at p < 0.01; ** trends statistically significant at p < 0.05; * trends statistically significant at p < 0.10. I—increasing trend; D—decreasing trend.
Table A6. Mann–Kendall test results for mean minimum temperature for the December–January–February (DJF), March–April–May (MAM), June–July–August (JJA), and September–October–November (SON) seasons in the selected stations in the Limpopo Province (1980–2018).
Table A6. Mann–Kendall test results for mean minimum temperature for the December–January–February (DJF), March–April–May (MAM), June–July–August (JJA), and September–October–November (SON) seasons in the selected stations in the Limpopo Province (1980–2018).
StationDJF MAM JJA SON
SVar(S)p-Valuez SVar(S)p-Valuez SVar(S)p-Valuez SVar(S)p-Valuez
Thabazimbi−65.00006294.30.4198−0.8066D176.00006312.60.02762 **2.2026I293.06319.00.000239 ***3.6733I58.006315.3 0.47320.7172I
Roedtan−133.0006297.00.09622 *−1.6634D−112.0006295.30.1618−1.399D−209.06314.30.008856 ***−2.6176D−131.06307.60.1017−1.6369D
Fleur-de-lys−161.0006311.60.04402 **−2.0139D−80.00006296.00.3194−0.9956D102.06308.00.20351.2717I−109.06300.30.1736−1.3606D
Sentrum-ysterpan74.0006298.60.35770.9198I183.00006309.60.02195 **2.2912I240.06312.00.002628 ***3.0083I149.06306.30.06237 *1.8637I
Modjadji 116.00006317.30.14791.4469I56.00000 6307.3 0.48860.6925I−74.006315.30.3583−0.9186D164.06314.60.04025 **2.0512I
Phalaborwa −10.00006299.30.9097−0.1134D−112.0006297.30.1619−1.3988D−151.06289.60.05857 *−1.8914D27.006283.60.74290.3279I
Marnitz125.00006299.00.11821.5624I2.0000006312.60.990.0125I−151.06312.30.05903 *−1.888D68.006296.00.39850.8443I
Shingwedzi−189.0006305.00.0179 **−2.3676D−197.0006296.30.01351 **−2.4701D−13.006303.00.8799−0.1511D−75.006305.00.3514−0.9319D
Punda maria−65.00006271.60.4190.8081D−223.0006302.30.0051 ***−2.7964D−188.06298.00.01846 **−2.3564D−125.06299.00.1182−1.5624D
Musina−140.0006294.60.07978 *−1.752D−141.0006306.30.07791 *−1.7629D7.0006297.60.93970.0756I−93.006297.60.2463−1.1593D
Tshiombo−132.0006284.00.09842 *−1.6525D−247.0006284.30.0019 ***−3.1032D−78.006295.30.3318−0.9704D−4.0006261.30.9698−0.0379D
Settlers27.000006279.00.74280.3281I128.00006301.30.10961.5999I94.006298.60.24131.1718I68.006292.00.39830.8446I
Zebediela−53.00006291.60.5121−0.6555D−152.0006302.00.05716 *−1.9021D−167.06315.60.03673 **−2.0888D9.0006303.6 0.91970.1007I
Bavaria −49.00006309.00.5456−0.6043D−32.00006310.00.6963−0.390D125.06318.30.11881.56I−68.006304.00.3988−0.8438D
Lephalale324.00006309.30.0000 ***4.0664I270.00006316.00.0007 ***3.3848I171.06305.00.03228 **2.1409I334.06314.60.0000 ***4.1905I
*** Trends statistically significant at p < 0.01; ** trends statistically significant at p < 0.05; * trends statistically significant at p < 0.10. I—increasing trend; D—decreasing trend.
Table A7. Mann–Kendall test results for mean maximum temperature for the December–January–February (DJF), March–April–May (MAM), June–July–August (JJA), and September–October–November (SON) seasons in the selected stations in the Limpopo Province (1980–2018).
Table A7. Mann–Kendall test results for mean maximum temperature for the December–January–February (DJF), March–April–May (MAM), June–July–August (JJA), and September–October–November (SON) seasons in the selected stations in the Limpopo Province (1980–2018).
StationDJF MAM JJA SON
SVar(S)p-Valuez SVar(S)p-Valuez SVar(S)p-ValueZ SVar(S)p-Valuez
Thabazimbi−99.00006314.30.2175−1.2333D−11.00006319.00.8999−0.1258D74.006310.00.35810.9189I46.006308.60.5710.5665I
Roedtan152.00006312.60.05737 *1.9005I155.00006305.00.05245 *1.9394I313.06309.60.0000 ***3.9278I280.06296.60.0004 ***3.516I
Fleur-de-lys−68.00006302.00.3987−0.8439D−85.00006293.60.2897−1.0588D29.006290.30.72410.3530I−11.006308.30.8998−0.1259D
Sentrum-ysterpan148.00006313.30.0643 *1.8501I132.00006317.30.09932 *1.6482I238.06298.00.0028 ***2.9864I276.06314.60.0005 ***3.4606I
Modjadji 213.00006323.00.0076 ***2.6661I229.00006316.30.0041 ***2.8688I317.06319.00.0000 ***3.9752I381.06321.00.0000 ***4.7796I
Phalaborwa 179.00006308.30.02502 **2.2411I214.00006310.00.0073 ***2.6814I353.06306.30.0000 ***4.4326I359.06305.60.0000 ***4.5083I
Marnitz234.00006314.60.0033 ***2.9321I297.0006307.0 0.0001 ***3.7272I352.06310.00.0000 ***4.4187I334.06306.00.0000 ***4.1934I
Shingwedzi−186.0006310.60.01987 **−2.3288D−111.0006304.30.1659−1.3854D−103.06298.30.1987−1.2852D−113.06313.60.1587−1.4095D
Punda maria23.000006309.60.78180.2769I44.000006312.00.58830.5412I258.06303.30.0012 ***3.237I295.06296.30.0002 ***3.7051I
Musina88.000006308.60.27341.0953I172.00006317.30.03144 **2.1514I345.06297.60.0000 ***4.3348I255.06317.00.0013 ***3.1958I
Tshiombo9.000006308.30.91980.1007I60.000006312.60.45770.7425I235.06307.00.0032 ***2.9465I249.06311.00.0017 ***3.1218I
Settlers211.00006309.60.0082 ***2.6437I216.00006310.60.0068 ***2.7065I350.06303.30.0000 ***4.3958I341.06316.30.0000 ***4.2781I
Zebediela145.00006292.30.06947 *1.8153I184.00006306.60.0212 **2.3044I361.06309.60.0000 ***4.5321I298.06307.30.0001 ***3.7397I
Bavaria −25.00006304.30.7624−0.3022D21.000006309.00.80120.2518I132.06310.60.09914 *1.649I160.06300.60.04517 **2.0031I
Lephalale56.00000 6305.30.48850.6926I144.00006307.30.07177 *1.8006I359.06307.00.0000 ***4.5079I293.06313.60.0002 ***3.6749I
*** Trends statistically significant at p < 0.01; ** trends statistically significant at p < 0.05; * trends statistically significant at p < 0.10. I—increasing trend; D—decreasing trend.

References

  1. Li, Y.; Conway, D.; Xiong, W.; Gao, Q.; Wu, Y.; Wan, Y.; Li, Y.; Zhang, S. Effects of climate variability and change on Chinese agriculture: A review. Clim. Res. 2011, 50, 83–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Vermeulen, S.J.; Aggarwal, P.K.; Ainslie, A.; Angelone, C.; Campbell, B.M.; Challinor, A.J.; Hansen, J.W.; Ingram, J.S.; Jarvis, A.; Kristjanson, P.; et al. Options for support to agriculture and food security under climate change. Environ. Sci. Policy 2012, 15, 136–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Marshall, N.A.; Smajgl, A. Understanding variability in adaptive capacity on rangelands. Rangel. Ecol. Manag. 2013, 66, 88–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Anderson, K.E.; Glenn, N.F.; Spaete, L.P.; Shinneman, D.J.; Pilliod, D.S.; Arkle, R.S.; McIlroy, S.K.; Derryberry, D.R. Estimating vegetation biomass and cover across large plots in shrub and grass dominated drylands using terrestrial lidar and machine learning. Ecol. Indic. 2018, 84, 793–802. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Vogel, E.; Donat, M.G.; Alexander, L.V.; Meinshausen, M.; Ray, D.K.; Karoly, D.; Meinshausen, N.; Frieler, K. The effects of climate extremes on global agricultural yields. Environ. Res. Lett. 2019, 14, 054010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Dingaan, M.N.; Tsubo, M. Improved assessment of pasture availability in semi-arid grassland of South Africa. Environ. Monit. Assess. 2019, 191, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Asare-Nuamah, P.; Botchway, E. Understanding climate variability and change: Analysis of temperature and rainfall across agroecological zones in Ghana. Heliyon 2019, 5, e02654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Belay, A.; Demissie, T.; Recha, J.W.; Oludhe, C.; Osano, P.M.; Olaka, L.A.; Solomon, D.; Berhane, Z. Analysis of climate variability and trends in Southern Ethiopia. Climate 2021, 9, 96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Eden, C.; Willebrand, J. Mechanism of interannual to decadal variability of the North Atlantic circulation. J. Clim. 2001, 14, 2266–2280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Malherbe, J.; Dieppois, B.; Maluleke, P.; Van Staden, M.; Pillay, D.L. South African droughts and decadal variability. Nat. Hazards 2016, 80, 657–681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Zhao, Y.; Wang, C.; Wang, S.; Tibig, L.V. Impacts of present and future climate variability on agriculture and forestry in the humid and sub-humid tropics. Clim. Chang. 2005, 70, 73–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Homar, V.; Ramis, C.; Romero, R.; Alonso, S. Recent trends in temperature and precipitation over the Balearic Islands (Spain). Clim. Chang. 2010, 98, 199–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. L’Heureux, M.L.; Takahashi, K.; Watkins, A.B.; Barnston, A.G.; Becker, E.J.; Di Liberto, T.E.; Gamble, F.; Gottschalck, J.; Halpert, M.S.; Huang, B.; et al. Observing and predicting the 2015/16 El Niño. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 2017, 98, 1363–1382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Cayan, D.R. Interannual climate variability and snowpack in the western United States. J. Clim. 1996, 9, 928–948. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Usman, M.T.; Reason, C.J.C. Dry spell frequencies and their variability over southern Africa. Clim. Res. 2004, 26, 199–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Roudier, P.; Sultan, B.; Quirion, P.; Berg, A. The impact of future climate change on West African crop yields: What does the recent literature say? Glob. Environ. Chang. 2011, 21, 1073–1083. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Engelbrecht, F.; Adegoke, J.; Bopape, M.J.; Naidoo, M.; Garland, R.; Thatcher, M.; McGregor, J.; Katzfey, J.; Werner, M.; Ichoku, C.; et al. Projections of rapidly rising surface temperatures over Africa under low mitigation. Environ. Res. Lett. 2015, 10, 085004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Intergovernmental Panel for Climate Change. Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2007. [Google Scholar]
  19. Salinger, M.J. Climate variability and change: Past, present and future—An overview. Clim. Chang. 2005, 70, 9–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Ziervogel, G.; Bharwani, S.; Downing, T.E. Adapting to climate variability: Pumpkins, people and policy. In Natural Resources Forum; Blackwell Publishing Ltd.: Oxford, UK, 2006; Volume 30, pp. 294–305. [Google Scholar]
  21. Chambers, J.C.; Pellant, M. Climate change impacts on northwestern and intermountain United States rangelands. Rangelands 2008, 30, 29–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Aggarwal, P.K.; Baethegan, W.E.; Cooper, P.; Gommes, R.; Lee, B.; Meinke, H.; Rathore, L.S.; Sivakumar, M.V. Managing climatic risks to combat land degradation and enhance food security: Key information needs. Procedia Environ. Sci. 2010, 1, 305–312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Mpandeli, N.S.; Maponya, P.I. Coping with climate variability in Limpopo province, South Africa. Peak J. Agric. Sci. 2013, 1, 54–64. [Google Scholar]
  24. Boansi, D.; Tambo, J.A.; Müller, M. Analysis of farmers’ adaptation to weather extremes in West African Sudan Savanna. Weather. Clim. Extrem. 2017, 16, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Godde, C.; Dizyee, K.; Ash, A.; Thornton, P.; Sloat, L.; Roura, E.; Henderson, B.; Herrero, M. Climate change and variability impacts on grazing herds: Insights from a system dynamics approach for semi-arid Australian rangelands. Glob. Chang. Biol. 2019, 25, 3091–3109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Vogel, C. “Seven fat years and seven lean years”? Climate change and agriculture in Africa. IDS Bull. 2005, 36, 30–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Thomas, D.S.; Twyman, C.; Osbahr, H.; Hewitson, B. Adaptation to climate change and variability: Farmer responses to intra-seasonal precipitation trends in South Africa. Clim. Chang. 2007, 83, 301–322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Hoffman, T.; Vogel, C. Climate change impacts on African rangelands. Rangelands 2008, 30, 12–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Funk, C.; Hoell, A.; Shukla, S.; Blade, I.; Liebmann, B.; Roberts, J.B.; Robertson, F.R.; Husak, G. Predicting East African spring droughts using Pacific and Indian Ocean sea surface temperature indices. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 2014, 18, 4965–4978. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Mbokodo, I.L.; Bopape, M.J.M.; Ndarana, T.; Mbatha, S.M.; Muofhe, T.P.; Singo, M.V.; Xulu, N.G.; Mohomi, T.; Ayisi, K.K.; Chikoore, H. Heatwave Variability and Structure in South Africa during Summer Drought. Climate 2023, 11, 38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Mpandeli, S.; Nesamvuni, E.; Maponya, P. Adapting to the impacts of drought by smallholder farmers in Sekhukhune District in Limpopo Province, South Africa. J. Agric. Sci. 2015, 7, 115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Conway, D.; Van Garderen, E.A.; Deryng, D.; Dorling, S.; Krueger, T.; Landman, W.; Lankford, B.; Lebek, K.; Osborn, T.; Ringler, C.; et al. Climate and southern Africa’s water–energy–food nexus. Nat. Clim. Chang. 2015, 5, 837–846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Maponya, P.; Mpandeli, S. The role of extension services in climate change adaptation in Limpopo province, South Africa. J. Agric. Ext. Rural. Dev. 2013, 5, 137–142. [Google Scholar]
  34. McGeehin, M.A.; Mirabelli, M. The potential impacts of climate variability and change on temperature-related morbidity and mortality in the United States. Environ. Health Perspect. 2001, 109 (Suppl. S2), 185–189. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  35. West, J.W. Effects of heat-stress on production in dairy cattle. J. Dairy Sci. 2003, 86, 2131–2144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Moeletsi, M.E.; Walker, S. Rainy season characteristics of the Free State Province of South Africa with reference to rain-fed maize production. Water SA 2012, 38, 775–782. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Mazibuko, S.M.; Mukwada, G.; Moeletsi, M.E. Assessing the frequency of drought/flood severity in the Luvuvhu River catchment, Limpopo Province, South Africa. Water SA 2021, 47, 172–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Archer, E.R.M.; Landman, W.A.; Malherbe, J.; Maluleke, P.; Weepener, H. Managing climate risk in livestock production in South Africa: How might improved tailored forecasting contribute? Clim. Risk Manag. 2021, 32, 100312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Gbetibouo, G.A. Understanding Farmers’ Perceptions and Adaptations to Climate Change and Variability; The Case of the Limpopo Basin, South Africa: IFPRI Discussion Paper 00849; IFPRI: Washington, DC, USA, 2009; Available online: http://www.ifpri.org/publication/understanding-farmers-perceptions-and-adaptationsclimate-change-and-variability (accessed on 20 October 2023).
  40. Maluleke, P.; Landman, W.A.; Malherbe, J.; Archer, E. Seasonal forecasts for the Limpopo Province in estimating deviations from grazing capacity. Theor. Appl. Climatol. 2019, 137, 1693–1702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Masupha, T.E.; Moeletsi, M.E.; Tsubo, M. Prospects of an agricultural drought early warning system in South Africa. Int. J. Disaster Risk Reduct. 2021, 66, 102615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Moeletsi, M.E.; Mellaart, E.A.R.; Mpandeli, N.S.; Hamandawana, H. The use of rainfall forecasts as a decision guide for small-scale farming in Limpopo Province, South Africa. J. Agric. Educ. Ext. 2013, 19, 133–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Archer, E.; Landman, W.; Malherbe, J.; Tadross, M.; Pretorius, S. South Africa’s winter rainfall region drought: A region in transition? Clim. Risk Manag. 2019, 25, 100188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Maponya, P.; Mpandeli, S. Climate change and agricultural production in South Africa: Impacts and adaptation options. J. Agric. Sci. 2012, 4, 48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Hoffmann, M.P.; Odhiambo, J.J.; Koch, M.; Ayisi, K.K.; Zhao, G.; Soler, A.S.; Rötter, R.P. Exploring adaptations of groundnut cropping to prevailing climate variability and extremes in Limpopo Province, South Africa. Field Crops Res. 2018, 219, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Olabanji, M.F.; Ndarana, T.; Davis, N. Impact of climate change on crop production and potential adaptive measures in the olifants catchment, South Africa. Climate 2021, 9, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Tshiala, M.F.; Olwoch, J.M. Impact of climate variability on tomato production in Limpopo Province, South Africa. Afr. J. Agric. Res. 2010, 5, 2945–2951. [Google Scholar]
  48. Tshiala, F.M.; Mukarugwiza Olwoch, J.; Alwyn Engelbrecht, F. Analysis of temperature trends over Limpopo province, South Africa. J. Geogr. Geol. 2011, 3, 13–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Nenwiini, S.; Kabanda, T.A. Trends and variability assessment of rainfall in Vhembe South Africa. J. Hum. Ecol. 2013, 42, 171–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. MacKellar, N.; New, M.; Jack, C. Observed and modelled trends in rainfall and temperature for South Africa: 1960–2010. S. Afr. J. Sci. 2014, 110, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Archer, E.R. Beyond the “climate versus grazing” impasse: Using remote sensing to investigate the effects of grazing system choice on vegetation cover in the eastern Karoo. J. Arid. Environ. 2004, 57, 381–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Mucina, L.; Rutherford, M.C. The Vegetation of South Africa, Lesotho and Swaziland in Strelitzia 19; South African National Biodiversity Institute: Pretoria, South Africa, 2006. [Google Scholar]
  53. Hoffman, M.T.; Todd, S. A national review of land degradation in South Africa: The influence of biophysical and socio-economic factors. J. South. Afr. Stud. 2000, 26, 743–758. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Leonard, L.; Lebogang, T. Exploring the impacts of mining on tourism growth and local sustainability: The case of Mapungubwe Heritage Site, Limpopo, South Africa. Sustain. Dev. 2018, 26, 206–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Phooko-Rabodiba, D.A.; Tambe, B.A.; Nesamvuni, C.N.; Mbhenyane, X.G. Socioeconomic determinants influencing nutritional status of children in sekhukhune district of Limpopo province in South Africa. J. Nutr. Health 2019, 5, 7. [Google Scholar]
  56. Schulze, B.R. Climate of South Africa. Part 8, General Survey; Government Printer & Weather Bureau: Pretoria, South Africa, 1965.
  57. Rapolaki, R.S.; Reason, C.J. Tropical storm Chedza and associated floods over south-eastern Africa. Nat. Hazards 2018, 93, 189–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Wessels, K.J.; Prince, S.D.; Malherbe, J.; Small, J.; Frost, P.E.; VanZyl, D. Can human-induced land degradation be distinguished from the effects of rainfall variability? A case study in South Africa. J. Arid. Environ. 2007, 68, 271–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Palmer, A.R.; Bennett, J.E. Degradation of communal rangelands in South Africa: Towards an improved understanding to inform policy. Afr. J. Range Forage Sci. 2013, 30, 57–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Cobon, D.H.; Baethgen, W.E.; Landman, W.; Williams, A.; van Garderen, E.A.; Johnston, P.; Malherbe, J.; Maluleke, P.; Kgakatsi, I.B.; Davis, P. Agroclimatology in grasslands. Agroclimatol. Link. Agric. Clim. 2020, 60, 369–423. [Google Scholar]
  61. Gibson, D.J. Land Degradation in the Limpopo Province, South Africa. Ph.D. Thesis, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa, 2006. [Google Scholar]
  62. Odhiambo, J.J.; Magandini, V.N. An assessment of the use of mineral and organic fertilizers by smallholder farmers in Vhembe district, Limpopo province, South Africa. Afr. J. Agric. Res. 2008, 3, 357–362. [Google Scholar]
  63. Phethi, M.D.; Gumbo, J.R. Assessment of impact of land use change on the wetland in Makhitha village, Limpopo province, South Africa. Jàmbá J. Disaster Risk Stud. 2019, 11, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Moeletsi, M.E.; Myeni, L.; Kaempffer, L.C.; Vermaak, D.; de Nysschen, G.; Henningse, C.; Nel, I.; Rowswell, D. Climate Dataset for South Africa by the Agricultural Research Council. Data 2022, 7, 117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Abbas, S.; Dastgeer, G. November. Analysing the impacts of climate variability on the yield of Kharif rice over Punjab, Pakistan. In Natural Resources Forum; Blackwell Publishing Ltd.: Oxford, UK, 2021; Volume 45, pp. 329–349. [Google Scholar]
  66. Shabalala, Z.P.; Moeletsi, M.E.; Tongwane, M.I.; Mazibuko, S.M. Evaluation of infilling methods for time series of daily temperature data: Case study of Limpopo Province, South Africa. Climate 2019, 7, 86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Mistry, M.N.; Schneider, R.; Masselot, P.; Royé, D.; Armstrong, B.; Kyselý, J. Comparison of weather station and climate reanalysis data for modelling temperature-related mortality. Sci. Rep. 2022, 12, 5178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Kisaka, M.O.; Mucheru-Muna, M.; Ngetich, F.K.; Mugwe, J.N.; Mugendi, D.; Mairura, F. Rainfall variability, drought characterization, and efficacy of rainfall data reconstruction: Case of Eastern Kenya. Adv. Meteorol. 2015, 2015, 380404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Vrsalović, A.; Andrić, I.; Bonacci, O.; Kovčić, O. Climate Variability and Trends in Imotski, Croatia: An Analysis of Temperature and Precipitation. Atmosphere 2023, 14, 861. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Hare, W. Assessment of knowledge on impacts of climate change-contribution. Arctic 2003, 100, 2–106. [Google Scholar]
  71. Silva, V.D.P.R. On climate variability in Northeast of Brazil. J. Arid. Environ. 2004, 58, 575–596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Olefs, M.; Koch, R.; Schöner, W.; Marke, T. Changes in snow depth, snow cover duration, and potential snowmaking conditions in Austria, 1961–2020—A model based approach. Atmosphere 2020, 11, 1330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Rehman, S.; Sajjad, H.; Masroor, M.; Rahaman, M.H.; Roshani Ahmed, R.; Sahana, M. Assessment of evidence-based climate variability in Bhagirathi sub-basin of India: A geostatistical analysis. Acta Geophys. 2022, 70, 445–463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Stewart, J.I. Response Farming in Rainfed Agriculture; Foundation for World Hunger: Davis, CA, USA, 1988. [Google Scholar]
  75. Yu, P.S.; Yang, T.C.; Wu, C.K. Impact of climate change on water resources in southern Taiwan. J. Hydrol. 2002, 260, 161–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Kendall, M.G. Rank Correlation Methods; Griffin: London, UK, 1948. [Google Scholar]
  77. Matimolane, S.; Chikoore, H.; Mathivha, F.I.; Kori, E. Maize producers’ vulnerability to climate change: Evidence from Makhuduthamaga Local Municipality, South Africa. Jàmbá J. Disaster Risk Stud. 2022, 14, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Kruger, A.C.; Shongwe, S. Temperature trends in South Africa: 1960–2003. Int. J. Climatol. A J. R. Meteorol. Soc. 2004, 24, 1929–1945. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Mupangwa, W.; Chipindu, L.; Ncube, B.; Mkuhlani, S.; Nhantumbo, N.; Masvaya, E.; Ngwira, A.; Moeletsi, M.; Nyagumbo, I.; Liben, F. Temporal changes in minimum and maximum temperatures at selected locations of southern Africa. Climate 2023, 11, 84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. van der Walt, A.J.; Fitchett, J.M. Exploring extreme warm temperature trends in South Africa: 1960–2016. Theor. Appl. Climatol. 2021, 143, 1341–1360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. van Wilgen, N.J.; Goodall, V.; Holness, S.; Chown, S.L.; McGeoch, M.A. Rising temperatures and changing rainfall patterns in South Africa’s national parks. Int. J. Climatol. 2016, 36, 706–721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Sa’adi, Z.; Shahid, S.; Ismail, T.; Chung, E.S.; Wang, X.J. Trends analysis of rainfall and rainfall extremes in Sarawak, Malaysia using modified Mann–Kendall test. Meteorol. Atmos. Phys. 2019, 131, 263–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Rufino, M.C.; Dury, J.; Tittonell, P.; Van Wijk, M.T.; Herrero, M.; Zingore, S.; Mapfumo, P.; Giller, K.E. Competing use of organic resources, village-level interactions between farm types and climate variability in a communal area of NE Zimbabwe. Agric. Syst. 2011, 104, 175–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Lamega, S.A.; Komainda, M.; Hoffmann, M.P.; Ayisi, K.K.; Odhiambo, J.J.O.; Isselstein, J. It depends on the rain: Smallholder farmers’ perceptions on the seasonality of feed gaps and how it affects livestock in semi-arid and arid regions in Southern Africa. Clim. Risk Manag. 2021, 34, 100362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Anyamba, A.; Tucker, C.J.; Eastman, J.R. NDVI anomaly patterns over Africa during the 1997/98 ENSO warm event. Int. J. Remote Sens. 2001, 22, 1847–1860. [Google Scholar]
  86. Davis, C.L.; Vincent, K. Climate Risk and Vulnerability: A Handbook for Southern Africa, 2nd ed.; CSIR: Pretoria, South Africa, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  87. Hatfield, J.L.; Prueger, J.H. Temperature extremes: Effect on plant growth and development. Weather Clim. Extrem. 2015, 10, 4–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Evans, J.; Geerken, R. Discrimination between climate and human-induced dryland degradation. J. Arid. Environ. 2004, 57, 535–554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Pachavo, G.; Murwira, A. Land-use and land tenure explain spatial and temporal patterns in terrestrial net primary productivity (NPP) in Southern Africa. Geocarto Int. 2014, 29, 671–687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Mbatha, K.R.; Ward, D. The effects of grazing, fire, nitrogen and water availability on nutritional quality of grass in semi-arid savanna, South Africa. J. Arid. Environ. 2010, 74, 1294–1301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. De Leeuw, P.N.; Tothill, J.C. The Concept of Rangeland Carrying Capacity in Sub-Saharan Africa: Myth or Reality; Overseas Development Institute, Pastoral Development Network: London, UK, 1990. [Google Scholar]
  92. Pickup, G.; Bastin, G.N.; Chewings, V.H. Remote-sensing-based condition assessment for nonequilibrium rangelands under large-scale commercial grazing. Ecol. Appl. 1994, 4, 497–517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Calvao, T.; Palmeirim, J.M. Mapping Mediterranean scrub with satellite imagery: Biomass estimation and spectral behaviour. Int. J. Remote Sens. 2004, 25, 3113–3126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Kurtz, D.B.; Schellberg, J.; Braun, M. Ground and satellite based assessment of rangeland management in sub-tropical Argentina. Appl. Geogr. 2010, 30, 210–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Hatfield, J.L.; Boote, K.J.; Kimball, B.A.; Ziska, L.H.; Izaurralde, R.C.; Ort, D.; Thomson, A.M.; Wolfe, D. Climate impacts on agriculture: Implications for crop production. Agron. J. 2011, 103, 351–370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Schulze, R.E.; Taylor, M.A. Planted Pastures in South Africa and Climate Change: Kikuyu, Eragrostis curvula and Coastcross II. In Handbook for Farmers, Officials and Other Stakeholders on Adaptation to Climate Change in the Agriculture Sector within South Africa. Section D: Natural Grasslands and Pastures in South Africa and Climate Change, Chapter D2; Schulze, R.E., Ed.; Department of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries: Pretoria, South Africa, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  97. Phillips, C. Cattle Behaviour and Welfare; John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2008. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. A map showing annual rainfall in South Africa, with the research area situated in the northeastern region.
Figure 1. A map showing annual rainfall in South Africa, with the research area situated in the northeastern region.
Climate 12 00002 g001
Figure 2. Inter-annual variation in total seasonal rainfall in the seasons December–January–February (DJF) (magenta line), March–April–May (MAM) (green line), June–July–August (JJA) (blue line), and September–October–November (SON) (red line) in the period 1980–2018.
Figure 2. Inter-annual variation in total seasonal rainfall in the seasons December–January–February (DJF) (magenta line), March–April–May (MAM) (green line), June–July–August (JJA) (blue line), and September–October–November (SON) (red line) in the period 1980–2018.
Climate 12 00002 g002
Figure 3. Inter-annual variation in mean minimum temperatures in the seasons December–January–February (DJF) (magenta line), March–April–May (MAM) (green line), June–July–August (JJA) (blue line), and September–October–November (SON) (red line) in the period 1980–2018.
Figure 3. Inter-annual variation in mean minimum temperatures in the seasons December–January–February (DJF) (magenta line), March–April–May (MAM) (green line), June–July–August (JJA) (blue line), and September–October–November (SON) (red line) in the period 1980–2018.
Climate 12 00002 g003
Figure 4. Inter-annual variation in mean maximum temperatures in the seasons December–January–February (DJF) (magenta line), March–April–May (MAM) (green line), June–July–August (JJA) (blue line), and September–October–November (SON) (red line) in the period 1980–2018.
Figure 4. Inter-annual variation in mean maximum temperatures in the seasons December–January–February (DJF) (magenta line), March–April–May (MAM) (green line), June–July–August (JJA) (blue line), and September–October–November (SON) (red line) in the period 1980–2018.
Climate 12 00002 g004
Table 1. Characteristics of selected weather stations in the Limpopo Province.
Table 1. Characteristics of selected weather stations in the Limpopo Province.
StationYears of Available DataLatitude (° S)Longitude (° E)Altitude (m)
Thabazimbi83−24.627.41164
Roedtan66−24.629.1973
Fleur-de-lys108−24.531.0622
Sentrum-ysterpan33−24.327.41005
Modjadji 32−23.630.4977
Phalaborwa 51−23.931.2433
Marnitz58−23.228.2932
Shingwedzi61−23.131.4215
Punda maria94−22.731.0462
Musina42−22.229.9505
Tshiombo35−22.830.5650
Settlers39−24.928.61050
Zebediela44−24.329.31250
Bavaria fruit estates74−24.430.9550
Lephalale33−23.827.7826
Table 2. The coefficient of variation results for selected weather stations in the Limpopo Province for rainfall, minimum and maximum temperatures (1980–2018).
Table 2. The coefficient of variation results for selected weather stations in the Limpopo Province for rainfall, minimum and maximum temperatures (1980–2018).
Station NameRainfall Minimum
Temperature
Maximum
Temperature
CV
(%)
CV CategoryCV
(%)
CV CategoryCV
(%)
CV Category
Thabazimbi27.0Moderate6.1Low4.8 Low
Roedtan29.4Moderate5.6Low4.2Low
Fleur-de-lys29.2Moderate4.8Low2.9Low
Sentrum-ysterpan25.9Moderate7.4Low4.5Low
Modjadji 35.7High7.3Low6.6Low
Phalaborwa 38.4High3.1Low3.3Low
Marnitz32.3High6.4Low6.1Low
Shingwedzi42.4High3.8Low4.7Low
Punda maria59.4High5.6Low4.8Low
Musina41.5High3.9Low4.3Low
Tshiombo62.8High2.6Low2.6Low
Settlers20.9Moderate6.4Low4.2Low
Zebediela22.6Moderate6.1Low3.6Low
Bavaria 29.5Moderate4.7Low2.8Low
Lephalale40.7High9.1Low3.5Low
Table 3. The coefficient of variation results for total seasonal rainfall for the December–January–February (DJF), March–April–May (MAM), June–July–August (JJA), and September–October–November (SON) seasons in the selected stations in the Limpopo Province (1980–2018).
Table 3. The coefficient of variation results for total seasonal rainfall for the December–January–February (DJF), March–April–May (MAM), June–July–August (JJA), and September–October–November (SON) seasons in the selected stations in the Limpopo Province (1980–2018).
Station NameDJFMAMJJASON
CV
(%)
CV
Category
CV
(%)
CV
Category
CV
(%)
CV
Category
CV
(%)
CV
Category
Thabazimbi65.5High43.7High118.8High43.4High
Roedtan42.2High64.1High297.3High53.2High
Fleur-de-lys42.7High42.0High105.4High42.2High
Sentrum-ysterpan67.9High46.4High131.8High35.3High
Modjadji 58.2High55.0High86.2High41.1High
Phalaborwa 52.0High49.7High108.4High52.7High
Marnitz45.2High55.6High122.9High54.9High
Shingwedzi63.7High70.4High84.1High52.7High
Punda maria69.5High77.2High366.1High59.5High
Musina71.2High83.5High161.7High56.3High
Tshiombo57.3High77.3High316.1High88.2High
Settlers35.0High62.8High112.8High39.2High
Zebediela32.7High56.6High130.7High44.9High
Bavaria 42.4High43.0High111.8High48.7High
Lephalale56.3High67.3High239.8High62.2High
Table 4. The coefficient of variation results for mean minimum temperature for the December–January–February (DJF), March–April–May (MAM), June–July–August (JJA), and September–October–November (SON) seasons in the selected stations in the Limpopo Province (1980–2018).
Table 4. The coefficient of variation results for mean minimum temperature for the December–January–February (DJF), March–April–May (MAM), June–July–August (JJA), and September–October–November (SON) seasons in the selected stations in the Limpopo Province (1980–2018).
Station NameDJFMAMJJA SON
CV
(%)
CV
Category
CV
(%)
CV
Category
CV
(%)
CV
Category
CV
(%)
CV
Category
Thabazimbi4.5Low9.1Low28.9Moderate7.8Low
Roedtan4.2Low8.0Low32.5High7.4Low
Fleur-de-lys5.3Low6.1Low10.2Low5.2Low
Sentrum-ysterpan4.5Low12.6 Low24.0Moderate9.2Low
Modjadji 11.2Low10.3Low14.7Low10.2Low
Phalaborwa 3.4Low5.0Low9.2Low3.7Low
Marnitz5.3Low8.8Low16.4Low8.2Low
Shingwedzi5.3Low7.0Low9.8Low6.6Low
Punda maria3.9Low8.0Low15.3Low5.3Low
Musina3.8Low6.5Low11.3Low4.1Low
Tshiombo2.6Low5.2Low7.0Low3.8Low
Settlers3.6Low7.5Low28.6Moderate7.8Low
Zebediela3.3Low8.4Low23.0Moderate6.0Low
Bavaria 5.2Low6.6Low13.1Low5.1Low
Lephalale8.0Low10.9Low20.8Low11.8Low
Table 5. The coefficient of variation results for mean maximum temperature for the December–January–February (DJF), March–April–May (MAM), June–July–August (JJA), and September–October–November (SON) seasons in the selected stations in the Limpopo Province (1980–2018).
Table 5. The coefficient of variation results for mean maximum temperature for the December–January–February (DJF), March–April–May (MAM), June–July–August (JJA), and September–October–November (SON) seasons in the selected stations in the Limpopo Province (1980–2018).
Station NameDJFMAMJJASON
CV
(%)
CV
Category
CV
(%)
CV
Category
CV
(%)
CV
Category
CV
(%)
CV
Category
Thabazimbi5.7Low7.4Low5.8Low4.5Low
Roedtan4.6Low4.8Low5.5Low5.2Low
Fleur-de-lys3.3Low3.7Low3.4Low3.9Low
Sentrum-ysterpan5.0Low5.3Low5.0Low5.2Low
Modjadji 7.0Low7.7Low7.8Low7.5Low
Phalaborwa 3.5Low4.7Low4.3Low3.8Low
Marnitz6.8Low6.9Low6.7Low6.0Low
Shingwedzi6.1Low6.3Low4.7Low5.5Low
Punda maria9.0Low8.6Low4.4Low5.2Low
Musina5.9Low5.3Low4.6Low4.3Low
Tshiombo4.4Low4.4Low3.3Low3.5Low
Settlers5.2Low5.4Low5.1Low4.9Low
Zebediela4.3Low4.0Low4.8Low4.1Low
Bavaria 3.8Low3.5Low3.6Low3.4Low
Lephalale4.4Low4.9Low4.5Low4.2Low
Table 6. Mann–Kendall test results, showing the p-Value and z-statistic, for total seasonal rainfall for the December–January–February (DJF), March–April–May (MAM), June–July–August (JJA), and September–October–November (SON) seasons in the selected stations in the Limpopo Province (1980–2018).
Table 6. Mann–Kendall test results, showing the p-Value and z-statistic, for total seasonal rainfall for the December–January–February (DJF), March–April–May (MAM), June–July–August (JJA), and September–October–November (SON) seasons in the selected stations in the Limpopo Province (1980–2018).
StationDJFMAMJJA SON
p-Valuezp-Valuezp-Valuezp-Valuez
Thabazimbi0.00039 ***3.5450.6320.4770.00006 ***−3.9860.1911.307
Roedtan0.00567 ***−2.7650.2791.0810.12751.52390.257−1.131
Fleur-de-lys0.13791.4830.3200.9930.4736−0.7160.5460.603
Sentrum-ysterpan0.00016 ***3.7710.9390.0750.0036 ***−2.9100.2681.106
Modjadji 0.9599−0.0500.821−0.2260.1103−1.5960.041 **−2.037
Phalaborwa 0.99−0.0120.9790.0250.1021−1.6340.489−0.691
Marnitz0.23731.1810.850−0.1880.90970.11340.71540.364
Shingwedzi0.0498 **1.9610.21791.2320.91990.10050.22261.219
Punda maria0.12511.5330.0528 *1.9360.24741.15680.743−0.326
Musina0.0627 *1.8600.80140.2510.8496−0.1890.7061−0.377
Tshiombo0.29091.0560.23731.1810.5546−0.5900.9390.075
Settlers0.84060.2010.25791.1310.5883−0.5410.9190.100
Zebediela0.5631−0.5780.40670.8290.6778−0.4150.4350.779
Bavaria 0.37880.8800.34570.9420.6328−0.4770.88010.150
Lephalale0.0122 *−2.5030.1346−1.4960.9197−0.1000.296−1.043
*** Trends statistically significant at p < 0.01; ** trends statistically significant at p < 0.05; * trends statistically significant at p < 0.10.
Table 7. Mann–Kendall test results, showing the p-Value and z-statistic, for mean minimum temperature for the December–January–February (DJF), March–April–May (MAM), June–July–August (JJA), and September–October–November (SON) seasons in the selected stations in the Limpopo Province (1980–2018).
Table 7. Mann–Kendall test results, showing the p-Value and z-statistic, for mean minimum temperature for the December–January–February (DJF), March–April–May (MAM), June–July–August (JJA), and September–October–November (SON) seasons in the selected stations in the Limpopo Province (1980–2018).
StationDJF MAM JJASON
p-Valuezp-Valuezp-Valuezp-Valuez
Thabazimbi0.419−0.8060.0276 **2.20260.00023 ***3.6730.4730.717
Roedtan0.0962 *−1.6630.1618−1.3990.00885 ***−2.6170.101−1.636
Fleur-de-lys0.0440 **−2.0130.3194−0.99560.20351.2710.173−1.360
Sentrum-ysterpan0.3570.9190.0219 **2.29120.00262 ***3.0080.0623 *1.863
Modjadji 0.1471.4460.4880.69250.3583−0.9180.0402 **2.051
Phalaborwa 0.909−0.1130.161−1.39880.0585 *−1.8910.7420.327
Marnitz0.1181.5620.990.01250.0590 *−1.8880.3980.844
Shingwedzi0.017 **−2.3670.0135 **−2.47010.8799−0.1510.351−0.931
Punda maria0.4190.8080.005 ***−2.79640.0184 **−2.3560.118−1.562
Musina0.0797 *−1.7520.0779 *−1.76290.93970.0750.246−1.159
Tshiombo0.0984 *−1.6520.0019 ***−3.10320.3318−0.9700.969−0.037
Settlers0.7420.3280.10961.59990.24131.1710.3980.844
Zebediela0.512−0.6550.0571 *−1.90210.0367 **−2.0880.9190.100
Bavaria 0.545−0.6040.6963−0.3900.11881.5600.398−0.843
Lephalale0.000 ***4.0660.0007 ***3.38480.0322 **2.1400.000 ***4.190
*** Trends statistically significant at p < 0.01; ** trends statistically significant at p < 0.05; * trends statistically significant at p < 0.10.
Table 8. Mann–Kendall test results showing the p-Value and z-statistic, for mean maximum temperature for the December–January–February (DJF), March–April–May (MAM), June–July–August (JJA), and September–October–November (SON) seasons in the selected stations in the Limpopo Province (1980–2018).
Table 8. Mann–Kendall test results showing the p-Value and z-statistic, for mean maximum temperature for the December–January–February (DJF), March–April–May (MAM), June–July–August (JJA), and September–October–November (SON) seasons in the selected stations in the Limpopo Province (1980–2018).
StationDJFMAM JJASON
p-Valuezp-Valuezp-Valuezp-Valuez
Thabazimbi0.2175−1.2330.899−0.12580.35810.91890.5710.5665
Roedtan0.057 *1.90050.0524 *1.93940.0000 ***3.92780.0004 ***3.516
Fleur-de-lys0.3987−0.8430.2897−1.05880.72410.35300.8998−0.125
Sentrum-ysterpan0.064 *1.85010.0993 *1.64820.0028 ***2.98640.0005 ***3.4606
Modjadji 0.007 ***2.6660.0041 ***2.86880.0000 ***3.97520.0000 ***4.7796
Phalaborwa 0.025 **2.2410.0073 ***2.68140.0000 ***4.43260.0000 ***4.5083
Marnitz0.003 ***2.9320.0001 ***3.72720.0000 ***4.41870.0000 ***4.1934
Shingwedzi0.019 **−2.3280.1659−1.38540.1987−1.2850.1587−1.409
Punda maria0.7810.2760.58830.54120.0012 ***3.2370.0002 ***3.7051
Musina0.2731.0950.0314 **2.15140.0000 ***4.33480.0013 ***3.1958
Tshiombo0.9190.1000.45770.74250.0032 ***2.94650.0017 ***3.1218
Settlers0.008 ***2.6430.006 ***2.70650.0000 ***4.39580.0000 ***4.2781
Zebediela0.069 *1.8150.0212 **2.30440.0000 ***4.53210.0001 ***3.7397
Bavaria 0.762−0.3020.80120.25180.0991 *1.6490.04517 **2.0031
Lephalale0.4880.6920.0717 *1.80060.0000 ***4.50790.0002 ***3.6749
*** Trends statistically significant at p < 0.01; ** trends statistically significant at p < 0.05; * trends statistically significant at p < 0.10.5.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Maluleke, P.; Moeletsi, M.E.; Tsubo, M. Analysis of Climate Variability and Its Implications on Rangelands in the Limpopo Province. Climate 2024, 12, 2. https://doi.org/10.3390/cli12010002

AMA Style

Maluleke P, Moeletsi ME, Tsubo M. Analysis of Climate Variability and Its Implications on Rangelands in the Limpopo Province. Climate. 2024; 12(1):2. https://doi.org/10.3390/cli12010002

Chicago/Turabian Style

Maluleke, Phumzile, Mokhele E. Moeletsi, and Mitsuru Tsubo. 2024. "Analysis of Climate Variability and Its Implications on Rangelands in the Limpopo Province" Climate 12, no. 1: 2. https://doi.org/10.3390/cli12010002

APA Style

Maluleke, P., Moeletsi, M. E., & Tsubo, M. (2024). Analysis of Climate Variability and Its Implications on Rangelands in the Limpopo Province. Climate, 12(1), 2. https://doi.org/10.3390/cli12010002

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop