Next Article in Journal
Climate Change Impacts and Adaptation in a Hill Farming System of the Himalayan Region: Climatic Trends, Farmers’ Perceptions and Practices
Next Article in Special Issue
Conservation and Management of Protected Areas in China and India: A Literature Review (1990–2021)
Previous Article in Journal
Identifying Common Trees and Herbaceous Plants to Mitigate Particulate Matter Pollution in a Semi-Arid Mining Region of South Africa
Previous Article in Special Issue
Periods and Amplitudes of Southern Pine Beetle Infestations under Climate Change
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Growth Response of Red Oaks to Climatic Conditions in the Lower Mississippi Alluvial Valley: Implications for Bottomland Hardwood Restoration with a Changing Climate

Climate 2023, 11(1), 10; https://doi.org/10.3390/cli11010010
by Junyeong Choi 1, Nana Tian 2,*, Jianbang Gan 1, Matthew Pelkki 2 and Ouname Mhotsha 2
Reviewer 1:
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Climate 2023, 11(1), 10; https://doi.org/10.3390/cli11010010
Submission received: 26 November 2022 / Revised: 20 December 2022 / Accepted: 28 December 2022 / Published: 30 December 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Climate Change and Deforestation and Forest Degradation)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

The manuscript reads well and is of satisfactorily high standard. However these few comments can improve the quality further:

1.    The abstract does not give any indication of the data collection protocols or how the data was analysed. Such information can be useful to the casual reader.

2.    The introduction is concise and justifies adequately the need for the research. The sentence on lines 62 – 64 is ambiguous. My understanding is that forest productivity is projected to decrease. But the sentence suggests that forest productivity based on tree ring analysis will decrease. I think the authors need to clarify this.

3.    The caption to Table 1 could benefit from some elaboration of the table; for example the abbreviated variables in the first column could be explained in the caption for clarity.

4.    It is intriguing that although the study is on growth rates, the results do not show any statistics on rates of growth of the various species under the specified windows / conditions. It would be instructive to provide summary statistics on the rates of growth to demonstrate more clearly the differences/similarities in growth rates under the different conditions studied to which Table 1 refers.

Author Response

Please see the attached file for response. 

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

See the attached file.

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Please see the attached file for response. 

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Back to TopTop