Next Article in Journal
Triple the Gamma—A Unifying Shrinkage Prior for Variance and Variable Selection in Sparse State Space and TVP Models
Previous Article in Journal
Forecast Accuracy Matters for Hurricane Damage
Previous Article in Special Issue
Representation of Japanese Candlesticks by Oriented Fuzzy Numbers
Open AccessFeature PaperArticle

New Evidence of the Marginal Predictive Content of Small and Large Jumps in the Cross-Section

Department of Economics, School of Arts and Sciences, Rutgers University, 75 Hamilton Street, New Brunswick, NJ 08901, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Econometrics 2020, 8(2), 19; https://doi.org/10.3390/econometrics8020019
Received: 19 February 2020 / Revised: 13 April 2020 / Accepted: 2 May 2020 / Published: 19 May 2020
We investigate the marginal predictive content of small versus large jump variation, when forecasting one-week-ahead cross-sectional equity returns, building on Bollerslev et al. (2020). We find that sorting on signed small jump variation leads to greater value-weighted return differentials between stocks in our highest- and lowest-quintile portfolios (i.e., high–low spreads) than when either signed total jump or signed large jump variation is sorted on. It is shown that the benefit of signed small jump variation investing is driven by stock selection within an industry, rather than industry bets. Investors prefer stocks with a high probability of having positive jumps, but they also tend to overweight safer industries. Also, consistent with the findings in Scaillet et al. (2018), upside (downside) jump variation negatively (positively) predicts future returns. However, signed (large/small/total) jump variation has stronger predictive power than both upside and downside jump variation. One reason large and small (signed) jump variation have differing marginal predictive contents is that the predictive content of signed large jump variation is negligible when controlling for either signed total jump variation or realized skewness. By contrast, signed small jump variation has unique information for predicting future returns, even when controlling for these variables. By analyzing earnings announcement surprises, we find that large jumps are closely associated with “big” news. However, while such news-related information is embedded in large jump variation, the information is generally short-lived, and dissipates too quickly to provide marginal predictive content for subsequent weekly returns. Finally, we find that small jumps are more likely to be diversified away than large jumps and tend to be more closely associated with idiosyncratic risks. This indicates that small jumps are more likely to be driven by liquidity conditions and trading activity. View Full-Text
Keywords: forecasting; integrated volatility; high-frequency data; jumps; realized skewness; cross-sectional stock returns; signed jump variation forecasting; integrated volatility; high-frequency data; jumps; realized skewness; cross-sectional stock returns; signed jump variation
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Yu, B.; Mizrach, B.; Swanson, N.R. New Evidence of the Marginal Predictive Content of Small and Large Jumps in the Cross-Section. Econometrics 2020, 8, 19.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Search more from Scilit
 
Search
Back to TopTop