# Not p-Values, Said a Little Bit Differently

## Abstract

**:**

## 1. Introduction

## 2. The General Problem

## 3. A Simple Example of the Problem

## 4. Summary

## Funding

## Acknowledgments

## Conflicts of Interest

## References

- Berger, James O., and Thomas Sellke. 1987. Testing a Point Null Hypothesis: The Irreconcilability of P Values and Evidence (with comments). Journal of the American Statistical Association 82: 112–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Berkson, Joseph. 1942. Tests of Significance Considered as Evidence. Journal of the American Statistical Association 37: 325–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dickey, James M. 1977. Is the Tail Area Useful as an Approximate Bayes Factor? Journal of the American Statistical Association 72: 138–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hubbard, Raymond, and María Jesús Bayarri. 2003. Confusion over Measures of Evidence (p’s) versus Errors (α’s) in Classical Statistical Testing. American Statistician 57: 171–82, Comments by K. N. Berk and M. A. Carlton, and Rejoinder. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hubbard, Raymond, and R. Murray Lindsay. 2008. Why P-Values Are Not a Useful Measure of Evidence in Statistical Significance Testing. Theory & Psychology 18: 69–88. [Google Scholar]
- Kim, Jae H., and Philip Inyeob Ji. 2015. Significance testing in empirical finance: A critical review and assessment. Journal of Empirical Finance 34: 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nickerson, Raymond S. 2000. Null hypothesis significance testing: A review of an old and continuing controversy. Psychological Methods 5: 241–301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Pearson, Egon S. 1938. “Student” as a statistician. Biometrika 30: 210–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Raiffa, Howard. 1968. Decision Analysis: Introductory Lectures on Choices under Uncertainty. Reading: Addison-Wesley. [Google Scholar]
- Robinson, Daniel H., and Howard Wainer. 2002. On the Past and Future of Null Hypothesis Significance Testing. Journal of Wildlife Management 66: 262–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Startz, Richard. 2014. Choosing the More Likely Hypothesis. Foundations and Trends in Econometrics 7: 120–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Trafimow, David. 2003. Hypothesis Testing and Theory Evaluation at the Boundaries: Surprising Insights From Bayes’s Theorem. Psychological Review 110: 526–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Trafimow, David. 2005. The ubiquitous Laplacian assumption: Reply to Lee and Wagenmakers. Psychological Review 112: 669–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Trafimow, David. 2015. The benefits of applying Bayes’ theorem in medicine. American Research Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences 1: 14–23. [Google Scholar]
- Trafimow, David, and Michael Marks. 2015. Editorial. Basic and Applied Social Psychology 37: 1–2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Trafimow, David, and Stephen Rice. 2009. A test of the NHSTP correlation argument. Journal of General Psychology 136: 261–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Wasserstein, Ronald L., and Nicole A. Lazar. 2016. The ASA’s Statement on p-Values: Context, Process, and Purpose. The American Statistician 70: 129–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

1 | See also Trafimow (2015) and Trafimow and Marks (2015). Trafimow offers a bit of history and explanations that are suitable for students at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dsp_hSIsacQ. |

2 | Robinson and Wainer (2002) take a more sanguine view of the possible damage of conflating the Fisherian and Neyman–Pearson approaches than does Hubbard and Bayarri (2003). |

3 | A dedicated Bayesian might point out that in the presence of prior information, a relatively non-informative prior would not be appropriate. An informative prior might lead to $P\left(\mu =0.5|H,n\right)$, either closer to the p-value or farther away. |

© 2019 by the author. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

## Share and Cite

**MDPI and ACS Style**

Startz, R. Not *p*-Values, Said a Little Bit Differently. *Econometrics* **2019**, *7*, 11.
https://doi.org/10.3390/econometrics7010011

**AMA Style**

Startz R. Not *p*-Values, Said a Little Bit Differently. *Econometrics*. 2019; 7(1):11.
https://doi.org/10.3390/econometrics7010011

**Chicago/Turabian Style**

Startz, Richard. 2019. "Not *p*-Values, Said a Little Bit Differently" *Econometrics* 7, no. 1: 11.
https://doi.org/10.3390/econometrics7010011