Selecting the Lag Length for the MGLS Unit Root Tests with Structural Change: A Warning Note for Practitioners Based on Simulations†
Central Reserve Bank of Peru, 441–445 Antonio Miró Quesada Street, Lima 1, Lima, Peru
Department of Economics, Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú, Av. Universitaria 1801, Lima 32, Lima, Peru
This Note is drawn from the Thesis of Ricardo Quineche at the Department of Economics, Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú (PUCP). This is a substantial revised version of an earlier version circulated under the title Data-Dependent Methods for the Lag Length Selection in Unit Root Tests with Structural Change which appear as Working Paper 404 of the Department of Economics, PUCP. The current version has been improved thanks to the relevant comments received from the Guest Editor of the Review (Professor Pierre Perron) and three anonymous Referees. Further, we thank comments of Luis García, José Tavera and Jorge Rojas (PUCP). Any remaining errors are our responsibility.
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Academic Editor: Pierre Perron
Received: 31 August 2016 / Revised: 31 March 2017 / Accepted: 4 April 2017 / Published: 16 April 2017
This is a simulation-based warning note for practitioners who use the
unit root tests in the context of structural change using different selection lag length criteria. With
, we find severe oversize problems when using some criteria, while other criteria produce an undersizing behavior. In view of this dilemma, we do not recommend using these tests. While such behavior tends to disappear when
, it is important to note that most empirical applications use smaller sample sizes such as
test does not present an oversizing or undersizing problem. The only disadvantage of the
test arises in the presence of
negative correlation, in which case the
tests are preferable, but in all other cases they are very undersized. When there is a break in the series, selecting the breakpoint using the Supremum method greatly improves the results relative to the Infimum method.
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License
which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited (CC BY 4.0).
Printed Edition Available!
A printed edition of this Special Issue is available here
Share & Cite This Article
MDPI and ACS Style
Quineche, R.; Rodríguez, G. Selecting the Lag Length for the MGLS Unit Root Tests with Structural Change: A Warning Note for Practitioners Based on Simulations. Econometrics 2017, 5, 17.
Quineche R, Rodríguez G. Selecting the Lag Length for the MGLS Unit Root Tests with Structural Change: A Warning Note for Practitioners Based on Simulations. Econometrics. 2017; 5(2):17.
Quineche, Ricardo; Rodríguez, Gabriel. 2017. "Selecting the Lag Length for the MGLS Unit Root Tests with Structural Change: A Warning Note for Practitioners Based on Simulations." Econometrics 5, no. 2: 17.
Show more citation formats
Show less citations formats
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.
[Return to top]
For more information on the journal statistics, click here
Multiple requests from the same IP address are counted as one view.