Next Article in Journal
Oil Price and Economic Growth: A Long Story?
Previous Article in Journal
Editorial Announcement
Previous Article in Special Issue
Removing Specification Errors from the Usual Formulation of Binary Choice Models
Open AccessArticle

Social Networks and Choice Set Formation in Discrete Choice Models

Department of Resource Economics and Environmental Sociology, University of Alberta, 214F Agriculture/Forestry Ctr, Edmonton, AB, Canada T6G 2P5
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Academic Editor: William Greene
Econometrics 2016, 4(4), 42;
Received: 19 December 2015 / Revised: 4 October 2016 / Accepted: 14 October 2016 / Published: 27 October 2016
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Discrete Choice Modeling)
The discrete choice literature has evolved from the analysis of a choice of a single item from a fixed choice set to the incorporation of a vast array of more complex representations of preferences and choice set formation processes into choice models. Modern discrete choice models include rich specifications of heterogeneity, multi-stage processing for choice set determination, dynamics, and other elements. However, discrete choice models still largely represent socially isolated choice processes —individuals are not affected by the preferences of choices of other individuals. There is a developing literature on the impact of social networks on preferences or the utility function in a random utility model but little examination of such processes for choice set formation. There is also emerging evidence in the marketplace of the influence of friends on choice sets and choices. In this paper we develop discrete choice models that incorporate formal social network structures into the choice set formation process in a two-stage random utility framework. We assess models where peers may affect not only the alternatives that individuals consider or include in their choice sets, but also consumption choices. We explore the properties of our models and evaluate the extent of “errors” in assessment of preferences, economic welfare measures and market shares if network effects are present, but are not accounted for in the econometric model. Our results shed light on the importance of the evaluation of peer or network effects on inclusion/exclusion of alternatives in a random utility choice framework. View Full-Text
Keywords: independent availability logit; social networks; choice set formation; welfare; market shares independent availability logit; social networks; choice set formation; welfare; market shares
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Wichmann, B.; Chen, M.; Adamowicz, W. Social Networks and Choice Set Formation in Discrete Choice Models. Econometrics 2016, 4, 42.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

Search more from Scilit
Back to TopTop