Next Article in Journal
Measuring the Distance between Sets of ARMA Models
Next Article in Special Issue
Jump Variation Estimation with Noisy High Frequency Financial Data via Wavelets
Previous Article in Journal
Estimation of Gini Index within Pre-Specified Error Bound
Previous Article in Special Issue
Continuous and Jump Betas: Implications for Portfolio Diversification
Open AccessArticle

Market Microstructure Effects on Firm Default Risk Evaluation

Risk Methodologies, Group Financial Risks, Group Risk Management, UniCredit Spa, Piazza Gae Aulenti, Tower A, Floor 20, Milano 20154, Italy
Department of Economics, University of Parma, Parma 43125, Italy
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Academic Editor: Nikolaus Hautsch
Econometrics 2016, 4(3), 31;
Received: 27 February 2016 / Revised: 1 June 2016 / Accepted: 22 June 2016 / Published: 8 July 2016
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Financial High-Frequency Data)
Default probability is a fundamental variable determining the credit worthiness of a firm and equity volatility estimation plays a key role in its evaluation. Assuming a structural credit risk modeling approach, we study the impact of choosing different non parametric equity volatility estimators on default probability evaluation, when market microstructure noise is considered. A general stochastic volatility framework with jumps for the underlying asset dynamics is defined inside a Merton-like structural model. To estimate the volatility risk component of a firm we use high-frequency equity data: market microstructure noise is introduced as a direct effect of observing noisy high-frequency equity prices. A Monte Carlo simulation analysis is conducted to (i) test the performance of alternative non-parametric equity volatility estimators in their capability of filtering out the microstructure noise and backing out the true unobservable asset volatility; (ii) study the effects of different non-parametric estimation techniques on default probability evaluation. The impact of the non-parametric volatility estimators on risk evaluation is not negligible: a sensitivity analysis defined for alternative values of the leverage parameter and average jumps size reveals that the characteristics of the dataset are crucial to determine which is the proper estimator to consider from a credit risk perspective. View Full-Text
Keywords: structural models; default probability; stochastic volatility; jumps; non-parametric volatility estimation; high-frequency data structural models; default probability; stochastic volatility; jumps; non-parametric volatility estimation; high-frequency data
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Barsotti, F.; Sanfelici, S. Market Microstructure Effects on Firm Default Risk Evaluation. Econometrics 2016, 4, 31.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

Search more from Scilit
Back to TopTop