Next Article in Journal
Genetic Engineering for Global Food Security: Photosynthesis and Biofortification
Previous Article in Journal
Variation Among Spring Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) Genotypes in Response to the Drought Stress. II—Root System Structure
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Plants
Volume 8
Issue 12
10.3390/plants8120585
plants-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
Erratum published on 31 December 2019, see Plants 2020, 9(1), 50.
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

5-Aminolevulinic Acid and Soil Fertility Enhance the Resistance of Rosemary to Alternaria dauci and Rhizoctonia solani and Modulate Plant Biochemistry

by
Hosam O. Elansary
1,2,3,*,
Diaa O. El-Ansary
4 and
Fahed A. Al-Mana
1
1
Plant Production Department, College of Food and Agricultural Sciences, King Saud University, P.O. Box 2455, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia
2
Floriculture, Ornamental Horticulture, and Garden Design Department, Faculty of Agriculture (El-Shatby), Alexandria University, Alexandria 21526, Egypt
3
Department of Geography, Environmental Management, and Energy Studies, University of Johannesburg, APK campus, Johannesburg 2092, South Africa
4
Precision Agriculture Laboratory, Department of Pomology, Faculty of Agriculture (El-Shatby), Alexandria University, Alexandria 21526, Egypt
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Plants 2019, 8(12), 585; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants8120585
Submission received: 20 November 2019 / Revised: 3 December 2019 / Accepted: 7 December 2019 / Published: 9 December 2019
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Fungal infection of horticultural and cereal crops by Alternaria dauci and Rhizoctonia solani represents an important biotic stress that could be alleviated by application of 5-aminolevulinic acid (ALA) to fertile and poor soils. Therefore, in this study, the morphological, physiological, biochemical, and genetic effects of ALA application (eight weekly applications at 3–10 ppm) to A. dauci- and R. solani-infected Salvia rosmarinus (rosemary) in fertile and poor soils were investigated. ALA-treated plants produced the longest and highest number of branches and had higher fresh and dry weights. There were increases in the major essential oil constituents (1,8-cineole, linalool, camphor, and borneol), as shown by Gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC-MS); higher antioxidant activities in DPPH and β-carotene-bleaching assays; upregulated superoxide dismutase (SOD) and catalase (CAT) antioxidant enzyme activities; increased total phenolics, chlorophyll, soluble sugars, and proline; increased gas exchange parameters; enhanced leaf water potential and relative water content (RWC); and upregulated expression of DREB2 and ERF3 (stress-related genes) and FeSOD, Cu/ZnSOD, and MnSOD (antioxidant genes). Several mechanisms were involved, including stress tolerance, antioxidative, and transcription regulation mechanisms. Furthermore, ALA performance was increased in higher-quality soils with higher nutrient content. This study demonstrated the novel application of ALA as a biotic stress ameliorant with enhanced performance in fertile soils.

1. Introduction

5-Aminolevulinic acid (ALA) is a natural compound found in plants that is used internally as a precursor of chlorophylls and phytochromes [1]. ALA has proven effects as an abiotic stress ameliorant against salinity, drought, cold, and heat [2,3,4], with other applications in agriculture, such as fruit coloring [5], fruit thinning [6], and ion uptake [7]. This natural compound, when applied externally to plant leaves, stimulates the photosynthetic apparatus and gas exchange, leading to enhanced stress tolerance during abiotic stress. Some mechanisms have been indicated in these effects, including the osmotic adjustment and antioxidative mechanisms. However, a complete picture of the different mechanisms involved and an in-depth understanding of the interactions of the known mechanisms are still lacking [8]. Furthermore, the effects of ALA as a stress ameliorant during biotic stress conditions have not yet been explored.
Alternaria dauci (Pleosporaceae) is a common plant pathogen that infects most horticultural crop leaves and causes water-soaked leaf spot, yellowing of leaves, and leaf death. It can also cause seedling damping-off, seed stalk blight, and infection of the inflorescence. Dozens of crops are regularly infected worldwide, including lettuce, carrot, and rosemary, resulting in significant economic losses [9]. Rhizoctonia solani (Ceratobasidiaceae) is a common plant pathogen that attacks the roots and stems of seeds, young plants (seedlings), and mature plants and causes several diseases, including damping-off, root rot, and wire stem. R. solani causes severe losses in all herbaceous plants, including major economic cereals in Europe, North and South America, and Australia and in vegetable crops, including potatoes, tomatoes, and cabbage. The control of such diseases is sophisticated, and an ideal control is not possible [10,11]; however, regular control is dependent on a mixture of factors, including the host crop, the environment, and the pathogen itself. Developing novel tools and strategies for fungal disease control in horticultural crops, such as using ALA, is critical for the development of agricultural production and industries.
Salvia rosmarinus (Lamiaceae) is an aromatic perennial herb, commonly known as rosemary. It is native to the Mediterranean region and has been grown successfully since ancient times [12]. The plant stems and leaves are harvested and consumed fresh or dry. The stems, leaves, and flowers are used for the extraction of the essential oil, which is routinely used in the perfume, pharmaceutical, and food industries. Fresh and dried plants are traditionally used for the treatment of several diseases, and recent studies have also revealed a large array of activities, including antioxidant, antimicrobial, and anticancer effects [13,14]. The plant is susceptible to various fungal infections, including A. dauci and R. solani, and no studies have been performed on the alleviation of biotic stress in rosemary using 5-aminolevulinic acid.
The current study aimed to explore the possible use of ALA as a biotic stress ameliorant against A. dauci and R. solani in rosemary. The morphological, physiological, biochemical, and genetic performances of the treated plants were investigated. Additionally, a novel approach was explored by using ALA as a biotic stress ameliorant under high and low fertility conditions. Several mechanisms were identified in these activities and are discussed here.

2. Results

2.1. Vegetative Growth

The effects of ALA, soil type, and fungal infection on the rosemary plant’s vegetative growth are shown in Figure 1. Two different media were used: A (30% sand + 70% loam) and B (100% loam soil). The biotic stress produced shorter plants with a lower number of leaves and caused reductions in the fresh and dry weights. Plants infected with A. dauci/R. solani and treated with high doses of ALA (5 and 10 ppm) produced the longest and highest number of branches under different soil mixes. The fresh and dry weights were the highest in infected and healthy plants treated with high doses of ALA (5 and 10 ppm). Healthy plants showed the highest vegetative growth among plants treated with ALA. Soil mix B plants showed higher performance than mix A under all growing conditions.

2.2. Essential Oil Composition

Four major essential oil constituents were identified: 1,8-cineole, linalool, camphor, and borneol, as shown in Table 1. The biotic stress produced higher amounts of linalool, camphor, and borneol compared to the control. In the control treatments, the application of ALA increased the content of these four major constituents, and soil mix B showed no significant difference from mix A. Under fungal infection, the application of higher doses of ALA yielded significant enhancement in the content of the major essential oil constituents.

2.3. Antioxidant Activities

The essential oil and leaf extract antioxidant activities are shown in Figure 2. Under control conditions, ALA treatment and soil mix B showed the highest antioxidant activities (lower values of IC50) in both essential oils and leaf extracts in the DPPH and β-carotene-linoleic acid assay. The fungus-infected plant essential oils and leaf extracts showed lower total antioxidant activities (higher values of IC50) compared to infected plants treated with ALA. Superoxide dismutase (SOD) and catalase (CAT) enzyme activities were higher in the leaves of plants treated with ALA for both healthy and infected plants, as shown in Figure 3. Soil mix B showed higher SOD activity in leaf extracts as compared to soil mix A.

2.4. Chlorophyll, Soluble Sugars, and Proline Compositions

Total phenolics, chlorophyll, carbohydrates, and proline were determined in the leaves, as shown in Figure 4. Under control conditions, ALA caused increases in phenolics as compared to untreated plants. Plants infected with A. dauci/R. solani and treated with ALA showed higher values of total phenolics compared to ALA-untreated plants. Total chlorophyll was higher in ALA-treated plants in the control as well as in the infected plants. Carbohydrates were higher in infected plants treated with ALA as compared to untreated plants. Proline accumulated in larger amounts in the leaves of infected plants treated with ALA as compared to the control.

2.5. Gas Exchange and Water Measures

The gas exchange parameters of the experiment are shown in Figure 5. The photosynthetic and transpiration rates and the conductance were higher in plants subjected to higher doses of ALA under normal growing conditions. Fungus-infected plants showed higher levels of photosynthesis and transpiration as well as stomatal conductance when subjected to ALA, as compared to untreated plants. Leaf water potential and relative water content (RWC) were higher also in ALA-treated plants under control conditions and in plants subjected to fungal infections (Figure 6). Soil mix B showed higher patterns of gas exchange as compared to soil mix A.

2.6. Gene Expression

The gene expression of control plants, as well as infected plants, during ALA treatment is shown in Figure 7 and Figure 8. Both DREB2 and ERF3 stress-related gene expression patterns showed significant increases under ALA treatment in both control and infected plants. The highest values were achieved when applying higher doses of ALA. Expression of antioxidant genes FeSOD, Cu/ZnSOD, and MnSOD was higher in ALA-treated plants under all conditions, and this expression was elevated in infected plants.

3. Discussion

Several reports have indicated that ALA might increase the fresh and dry weight of plants during stress conditions [2,4]. However, other reports indicate that ALA might act as a vegetative growth retardant with herbicidal activity and cause leaf necrosis [15,16]. The present study found stimulatory morphological effects of ALA in rosemary plants, including increased length, number of branches, and fresh and dry weights, which have not been previously reported in this species. The improved vegetative growth of plants infected with fungi as a biotic stressor and the higher ALA activity with increasing soil fertility or improvement in physiochemical properties (as in soil mix B) are novel findings. These could be attributed to the increased photosynthetic rates in plants treated with high doses of ALA. ALA stimulates vegetative growth by stimulating photosynthesis and photosynthetic rates [3]. Fungal infection by A. dauci and R. solani reduced the growth of infected plants that were not treated with ALA (Figure 1). The application of ALA alleviated this biotic stress and enhanced vegetative growth; to our knowledge, the present study is the first to report this finding. Furthermore, the availability of macro- and micronutrients in the soil increased the performance of ALA, as expressed in increased fresh and dry weights [8].
Rosemary plants are characterized by the presence of 1,8-cineole, linalool, camphor, and borneol in the essential oil of the leaves [12], as found in this study. Treatment with high doses of ALA significantly increased the ratio of the main components in the essential oil of the leaves in plants showing increased vegetative growth due to alleviated biotic stress. The change in major components of the essential oil could be attributed to the regulatory effects of ALA on plant metabolism, identified here as increased gas exchange and leaf water potential and relative water content, soluble sugars, and phenols. Previous investigations have found that ALA can modulate leaf water potential and gas exchange under abiotic stress conditions [4]. The shifts in essential oil composition of the leaves help to control fungal infections and increase the resistance of infected plants. Most of these main constituents have shown antifungal activities against A. dauci and R. solani [17,18,19].
ALA is known to influence the antioxidant mechanism of treated plants during specific stress conditions, such as drought, salinity, and cold, by increasing the photosynthetic rate, reducing damage to the photosynthetic apparatus, enhancing gas exchange, and increasing chlorophyll content [20,21,22]. The antioxidant activities of the essential oils and leaf extracts were higher in ALA-treated plants than in the control because of the increased SOD and CAT enzyme activities in the leaves, as well as the increase in primary essential oil constituents exhibiting strong antioxidant activities, such as cineol and linalool [23,24]. Such increases in the antioxidant defense mechanism associated with increased growth of plants and alleviation of fungal infection stress have not been previously reported. In addition, there was an accumulation of proline, which is known to accumulate under stress conditions in most plants. Proline is the antioxidant defense mechanism molecule that maintains turgor pressure and membrane stability.
Increases in the total phenolic composition of the leaves were found, and this accumulation played a major role in increasing the antioxidant activity of the leaves and resistance to biotic and abiotic stresses. Previous reports have indicated that ALA application can increase the phenolic composition of treated plants [4,25]. The present study showed that soil fertility might increase phenolic and antioxidant accumulation in the leaves of ALA-treated plants under biotic stress. Previous studies found that ALA application enhances nutrient uptake under normal and abiotic stress conditions [7,26]. The present study confirmed that this occurs under biotic stress conditions as well. There were increases in the chlorophyll composition of leaves in plants treated with ALA, which is the precursor of chlorophyll and other important molecules in plants [1]. The accumulation of soluble sugars found here under biotic stress might be considered a stress tolerance mechanism because this accumulation enhanced the osmotic adjustment and performance of the plants subjected to fungal infection. The accumulation of sugars was higher in loamy soil subjected to ALA, owing to the higher rate of photosynthesis in the leaves and levels of macro- and micronutrients in the soil. The increases in gas exchange parameters in ALA-treated plants were associated with increased leaf water potential and RWC under fungal infection, which play a major role in the improvement of vegetative growth of the plants and are considered a stress tolerance mechanism [27]. The treatment with ALA can recover the transpiration rate and the stomatal conductance when the plants are attacked by Alternaria, with respect to the non-attacked plants.
The present study also showed increases in the gene expression of stress-related (DREB2 and ERF3) and antioxidant genes (FeSOD, Cu/ZnSOD, and MnSOD) in plants treated with ALA under biotic stress conditions as compared to the control. Previous studies have indicated that ALA upregulates the expression of POD, CAT, and ascorbate peroxidase (APX) in Brassica napus subjected to salt stress conditions [21]. However, the stimulatory activity of these genes had not previously been reported under biotic stress conditions, as in this study. Furthermore, these activities explain the enhanced antioxidant properties of ALA-treated plants and indicate that the antioxidant mechanism might be considered the main function of ALA as a biotic stress ameliorant. It was clear that soil mix B (100% loam) yielded better morphological and physiological performance than soil mix A (70% loam + 30% sand).
In the current study, we demonstrated the novel finding that ALA application alleviates plant biotic stress conditions via several mechanisms, including stress tolerance and the antioxidative mechanism, by enhancing relative water content gas exchange and osmotic adjustment, activating antioxidant enzymes, accumulating antioxidants, and stimulating stress and antioxidant genes. Furthermore, ALA performance was increased in higher-quality soils with higher nutrient levels.

4. Material and Methods

4.1. Plant Material, Soil Mixes, ALA Treatment, and Inoculum Preparation

Young Salvia rosmarinus (L.) Schleid. plantlets (10 cm) containing 4–5 buds were obtained from local commercial nurseries in two successive seasons (January 2018 and 2019). The plants were identified, and voucher specimens were maintained at Alexandria University, Egypt. Plants were transplanted into larger 3.1 L plastic pots containing two different media: A (30% sand + 70% loam) and B (100% loam soil). The physiochemical properties of both soils are shown in Table 2. Organic carbon was determined, following Reference [28]. Fe, Cu, Zn, and Mn were determined by atomic absorption spectrophotometry (AASVario 6, Jena, Germany) [29]. Nitrogen was determined using the Kjeldahl method [30] and phosphorus was determined via the phosphomolybdic acid method [31]. Experiments were conducted in a greenhouse and repeated during the years 2018 and 2019. Growing media were supported by 2g L−1 fertilizer (Crystalon®, 19% N: 19% P: 19% K). The mean growing temperatures were 15.1 °C at night a 24.5 °C during the day, relative humidity ranged between 68% and 82%, and photosynthetic active radiation was 900 W m−2 at 12:00. The plants were watered every 48 h until drop-off. A foliar spray of 5-aminolevulinic acid (ALA, Sigma-Aldrich, Berlin, Germany) at 3, 5, and 10 ppm was applied weekly until drop-off. Untreated plants were considered the control.
A. dauci and R. solani fungi were isolated from infected rosemary plants showing symptoms of blight and crown rot. The plant surface was sterilized with 0.1% sodium hypochlorite, and small infected pieces of leaves or roots were cut and placed in Petri dishes with potato dextrose agar medium for 2 weeks at 25 °C. The fungi were identified using microscopic morphological characteristics. The inoculum of each fungus was prepared by introducing a sterile needle into sterilized and filtered flasks of Richard’s liquid medium, containing 5 g KH2PO4, 10 g KNO3, 2.5 g MgSO4, 0.02 g FeCl3, 50 g sucrose, and 1000 mL distilled water. They were then incubated for 2 weeks at 25 ± 1 °C, and the mycelia mat was isolated by filtering with filter paper No. 1, washing with distilled water, mixing 10 g of mycelium in 100 mL distilled water, blending the mix at 10,000 rpm in a Waring blender, and inoculating a suspension of 1 g fungus suspension to the young plants. Untreated plants with fungi were used as a control. Factorial experimental design was used. Three blocks were used: Each block contained 24 treatments (3 fungal treatments, including control × 2 soil mixes × 4 ALA doses). Each treatment was represented by 6 replicates, and the total number of plants was 144 plants per block. All chemicals were HPLC grade (Sigma-Aldrich, Cairo, Egypt).

4.2. Morphological Measurements

After 8 weeks, branch length (cm) was determined, number of branches per plant was counted, and the fresh (FWs, g) and dry weights (DWs, g) were obtained. The dry weight was determined by preliminary drying at room temperature (20 °C), then dried in the oven at 30 °C until reaching a constant weight, following Reference [32].

4.3. GC-MS of Essential Oil and Preparation of Leaf Extracts

Leaf essential oil was extracted via hydrodistillation of dried leaves (500 g) using a Clevenger-type apparatus. The oil was dried, filtered, and kept at 4 °C under dark conditions [33]. A gas chromatograph mass spectrometer (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) equipped with a TG-1MS column was used for the analyses. The temperature was ramped from 45 °C to 165 °C at 4 °C min−1 for 2 min, followed by a gradual increase reaching 280 °C for 15 min. Helium was used as a carrier gas, and the same temperature was used for gas chromatography with flame-ionization detection (GC-FID). The retention times and indices of n-alkanes (C10–C36) were used for the identification of detected compounds along with computer matching in the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) mass spectra ver. 2.0 and WILEY libraries. Literature references were also used for accurate identification and comparison [12,34]. Leaf extracts were obtained as described previously in [35] and then maintained at −80 °C for further analysis.

4.4. Antioxidant Activities

The total antioxidant activities were determined for leaves using the 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) and β-carotene-linoleic acid assays [33]. Briefly, for DPPH, 50 μL (1 mg·mL−1) of the leaf methanolic extract was mixed with DPPH solution (5 mL, 0.004%) and incubated for 30 min in the dark, and then the absorbance was determined at 517 nm in a spectrophotometer. For the β-carotene-linoleic assay, β-carotene was incubated for 48 h with leaf methanolic extract (50 μL), and the absorbance was then determined at 470 nm. The results were expressed as IC50 in µg mL−1. Superoxide dismutase (SOD) and catalase (CAT) activities were quantified in leaf tissues [12,36]. Experiments were repeated twice in triplicate.

4.5. Chlorophyll, Soluble Sugars, and Proline Compositions

Total chlorophyll was determined in leaves, following Reference [37]. The soluble sugar in the leaves was determined (% of DW), following Reference [38], and proline was determined in the leaves, following Reference [39].

4.6. Gas Exchange and Water Measures

Net photosynthetic rate (A), transpiration rate (E), and stomatal conductance (gs) were determined using portable gas exchange equipment (ADC LCi, Bioscientific Ltd., Hoddesdon, UK) in the morning (10:00) in mature leaves at the end of the experiment. The leaf water potential and relative water content (RWC) of mature leaves were determined at noon (12:00), following References [4,40].

4.7. Gene Expression

To assess the expression of stress-related genes, quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR) was conducted for FeSOD, Cu/ZnSOD, MnSOD, DREB2, and ERF3 in three plants of each treatment subjected to ALA and fungal infection. The RNA was isolated from young leaves using the RNeasy Plant Mini Kit (Qiagen, Berlin, Germany). To obtain the cDNA, a Reverse Transcription Kit (Qiagen, Berlin, Germany) was used, and qRT-PCR was performed in triplicate using QuantiTect SYBR Green PCR (Qiagen, Berlin, Germany). PCR primers and conditions followed Reference [12]. The Actin housekeeping gene [41] was used as a control, and the 2−∆∆Ct method was used to determine the relative expression levels.

4.8. Statistical Analyses

Factorial experimental design was used. Three blocks were used: Each block contained 24 treatments (3 fungal treatments, including control × 2 soil mixes × 4 ALA doses). Each treatment was represented by 6 replicates, and the total number of plants was 144 plants per block. The least significant differences (LSD) were determined for all means (SPSS, PASW Ver. 22, Chicago, IL, USA).

5. Conclusions

A novel finding discovered in this study confirmed that ALA could alleviate the biotic stress of rosemary plants caused by A. dauci/R. solani fungal infections. The biotic stress produced shorter plants with a lower number of leaves and caused reductions in the fresh and dry weights. ALA-treated plants produced the longest and highest number of branches, higher fresh and dry weights, increases in major essential oil components (1,8-cineole, linalool, camphor, and borneol), higher antioxidant activities in DPPH and β-carotene-bleaching assays, upregulated SOD and CAT antioxidant enzyme activities, increased total phenolics, chlorophyll, soluble sugars, and proline, increased gas exchange parameters, leaf water potential, and RWC, and upregulated expression of DREB2 and ERF3 (stress-related genes) and FeSOD, Cu/ZnSOD, and MnSOD (antioxidant genes). Several mechanisms were involved, including stress tolerance, antioxidative, and transcription regulation mechanisms. Furthermore, we found that ALA performance was increased in higher-quality soils with higher nutrient content.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, H.O.E.; data curation, H.O.E. and D.O.E.-A.; formal analysis, H.O.E. and F.A.A.-M.; funding acquisition, H.O.E. and D.O.E.-A.; investigation, H.O.E., D.O.E.-A., and F.A.A.-M.; methodology, H.O.E. and D.O.E.-A.; resources, F.A.A.-M.; software, F.A.A.-M.

Funding

The study was funded by King Saud University through the Researchers Supporting Project number (RSP-2019/118).

Acknowledgments

The authors thank King Saud University through the Researchers Supporting Project number (RSP-2019/118).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Senge, O.M.; Ryan, A.A.; Letchford, A.K.; MacGowan, A.S.; Mielke, T. Chlorophylls, Symmetry, Chirality, and Photosynthesis. Symmetry 2014, 6, 781–843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Wu, Y.; Jin, X.; Liao, W.; Hu, L.; Dawuda, M.M.; Zhao, X.; Tang, Z.; Gong, T.; Yu, J. 5-Aminolevulinic Acid (ALA) Alleviated Salinity Stress in Cucumber Seedlings by Enhancing Chlorophyll Synthesis Pathway. Front. Plant Sci. 2018, 9, 635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Sun, Y.P.; Liu, J.; Cao, R.X.; Huang, Y.J.; Hall, A.M.; Guo, C.B.; Wang, L.J. Effects of 5-aminolevulinic acid treatment on photosynthesis of strawberry. Photosynthetica 2017, 55, 276–284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Al-Ghamdi, A.A.; Elansary, H.O. Synergetic effects of 5-aminolevulinic acid and Ascophyllum nodosum seaweed extracts on Asparagus phenolics and stress related genes under saline irrigation. Plant. Physiol. Biochem. 2018, 129, 273–284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Feng, S.; Li, M.F.; Wu, F.; Li, W.L.; Li, S.P. 5-Aminolevulinic acid affects fruit coloration, growth, and nutrition quality of Litchi chinensis Sonn. cv. Feizixiao in Hainan, tropical China. Sci. Hortic-Amst. 2015, 193, 188–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. An, Y.; Li, J.; Duan, C.; Liu, L.; Sun, Y.; Cao, R.; Wang, L. 5-Aminolevulinic Acid Thins Pear Fruits by Inhibiting Pollen Tube Growth via Ca(2+)-ATPase-Mediated Ca(2+) Efflux. Front. Plant Sci. 2016, 7, 121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Ali, B.; Gill, R.A.; Yang, S.; Gill, M.B.; Farooq, M.A.; Liu, D.; Daud, M.K.; Ali, S.; Zhou, W. Regulation of Cadmium-Induced Proteomic and Metabolic Changes by 5-Aminolevulinic Acid in Leaves of Brassica napus L. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0123328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Wu, Y.; Liao, W.; Dawuda, M.M.; Hu, L.; Yu, J. 5-Aminolevulinic acid (ALA) biosynthetic and metabolic pathways and its role in higher plants: A review. J. Plant. Growth Regul. 2019, 87, 357–374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Koike, S.T.; Smith, R.F.; Cahn, M.D.; Pryor, B.M. Association of the carrot pathogen Alternaria dauci with new diseases, alternaria leaf speck, of lettuce and celery in California. Plant. Health Progress 2017, 18, 136–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Sturrock, C.J.; Woodhall, J.; Brown, M.; Walker, C.; Mooney, S.J.; Ray, R.V. Effects of damping-off caused by Rhizoctonia solani anastomosis group 2-1 on roots of wheat and oil seed rape quantified using X-ray Computed Tomography and real-time PCR. Front. Plant Sci. 2015, 6, 461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Molla, K.A.; Karmakar, S.; Chanda, P.K.; Ghosh, S.; Sarkar, S.N.; Datta, S.K.; Datta, K. Rice oxalate oxidase gene driven by green tissue-specific promoter increases tolerance to sheath blight pathogen (Rhizoctonia solani) in transgenic rice. Mol. Plant. Pathol. 2013, 14, 910–922. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. El-Esawi, M.A.; Elansary, H.O.; El-Shanhorey, N.A.; Abdel-Hamid, A.M.E.; Ali, H.M.; Elshikh, M.S. Salicylic Acid-Regulated Antioxidant Mechanisms and Gene Expression Enhance Rosemary Performance under Saline Conditions. Front. Physiol. 2017, 8, 716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Elansary, H.O.; Mahmoud, E.A. Egyptian herbal tea infusions’ antioxidants and their antiproliferative and cytotoxic activities against cancer cells. Nat. Prod. Res. 2015, 29, 474–479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Habtemariam, S. The Therapeutic Potential of Rosemary (Rosmarinus officinalis) Diterpenes for Alzheimer’s Disease. Evid. Based Complement. Altern. Med. eCAM 2016, 2016, 2680409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Phung, T.-H.; Jung, S. Perturbed porphyrin biosynthesis contributes to differential herbicidal symptoms in photodynamically stressed rice (Oryza sativa) treated with 5-aminolevulinic acid and oxyfluorfen. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 2014, 116, 103–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Chon, S.-U. Herbicidal activity of δ-aminolevulinic acid on several plants as affected by application methods. Korean J. Crop. Sci. Hortic. 2003, 48, 50–55. [Google Scholar]
  17. Nazzaro, F.; Fratianni, F.; Coppola, R.; Feo, V.D. Essential Oils and Antifungal Activity. Pharmaceuticals 2017, 10, 86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Abad, M.J.; Ansuategui, M.; Bermejo, P. Active antifungal substances from natural sources. Arkivoc 2007, 7, 116–145. [Google Scholar]
  19. Gwinn, K.D.; Ownley, B.H.; Greene, S.E.; Clark, M.M.; Taylor, C.L.; Springfield, T.N.; Trently, D.J.; Green, J.F.; Reed, A.; Hamilton, S.L. Role of Essential Oils in Control of Rhizoctonia Damping-Off in Tomato with Bioactive Monarda Herbage. Phytopathology 2010, 100, 493–501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Liu, D.; Kong, D.D.; Fu, X.K.; Ali, B.; Xu, L.; Zhou, W.J. Influence of exogenous 5-aminolevulinic acid on chlorophyll synthesis and related gene expression in oilseed rape de-etiolated cotyledons under water-deficit stress. Photosynthetica 2016, 54, 468–474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Zhen, A.; Bie, Z.L.; Huang, Y.; Liu, Z.X.; Fan, M.L. Effects of 5-aminolevulinic acid on the H2O2-content and antioxidative enzyme gene expression in NaCl-treated cucumber seedlings. Biol. Plant. 2012, 56, 566–570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Liu, T.; Hu, X.; Zhang, J.; Zhang, J.; Du, Q.; Li, J. H2O2 mediates ALA-induced glutathione and ascorbate accumulation in the perception and resistance to oxidative stress in Solanum lycopersicum at low temperatures. BMC Plant Biol. 2018, 18, 34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Torres-Martínez, R.; García-Rodríguez, Y.M.; Ríos-Chávez, P.; Saavedra-Molina, A.; López-Meza, J.E.; Ochoa-Zarzosa, A.; Garciglia, R.S. Antioxidant Activity of the Essential Oil and its Major Terpenes of Satureja macrostema (Moc. and Sessé ex Benth.) Briq. Pharmacogn. Mag. 2018, 13 (Suppl. 4), S875–S880. [Google Scholar]
  24. Seol, G.-H.; Kang, P.; Lee, H.S.; Seol, G.H. Antioxidant activity of linalool in patients with carpal tunnel syndrome. BMC Neurol. 2016, 16, 17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Chen, L.; Guo, Y.; Bai, G.; Sun, J.; Li, Y. Effect of 5-aminolevulinic acid and genistein on accumulation of polyphenol and anthocyanin in ‘Qinyang’ apples. Anim. Plant Sci. 2015, 25 (Suppl. 1), 68–79. [Google Scholar]
  26. Mohamed, A.A.; Adel, D.A.Q. Promotive effects of 5-aminolevulinic acid on growth of young ‘Barhee’ tissue culture- derived date palm (Phoenix dactylifera L.) trees in a newly established orchard. Food Agric. Environ. 2011, 9, 783–786. [Google Scholar]
  27. De Assis Gomes, M.d.M.; Lagôa, A.M.M.A.; Medina, C.L.; Machado, E.C.; Machado, M.A. Interactions between leaf water potential, stomatal conductance and abscisic acid content of orange trees submitted to drought stress. Braz. J. Plant Physiol. 2004, 16, 155–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Emamgholizadeh, S.; Esmaeilbeiki, F.; Babak, M.; zarehaghi, D.; Maroufpoor, E.; Rezaei, H. Estimation of the organic carbon content by the pattern recognition method. Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 2018, 49, 2143–2154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Mohamed, R.A.; Abdel-Lateef, A.M.; Mahmoud, H.H.; Helal, A.I. Determination of trace elements in water and sediment samples from Ismaelia Canal using ion chromatography and atomic absorption spectroscopy. Chem. Speciat. Bioavailab. 2012, 24, 31–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Nelson, D.W.; Sommers, L.E. A simple digestion procedure for estimation of total nitrogen in soil and sediments. J. Environ. Qual. 1972, 1, 423–425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Neal, C.; Neal, M.; Wickham, H. Phosphate measurement in natural waters: Two examples of analytical problems associated with silica interference using phosphomolybdic acid methodologies. Sci. Total Environ. 2000, 251–252, 511–522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Elansary, H.O.; Mahmoud, E.A. In vitro antioxidant and antiproliferative activities of six international basil cultivars. Nat. Prod. Res. 2015, 29, 2149–2154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Elansary, H.O.; Yessoufou, K.; Shokralla, S.; Mahmoud, E.A.; Skaicka-Wozniak, K. Enhancing mint and basil oil composition and antibacterial activity using seaweed extracts. Ind. Crops Prod. 2016, 92, 50–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Adams, R.P. Identification of Essential Oil Compounds by Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry, 4th ed.; Allured pub Corp: Carol Stream, IL, USA, 2007. [Google Scholar]
  35. Elansary, H.O.; Salem, M.Z.M.; Ashmawy, N.A.; Yessoufou, K.; El-Settawy, A.A.A. In vitro antibacterial, antifungal and antioxidant activities of Eucalyptus spp. leaf extracts related to phenolic composition. Nat. Prod. Res. 2017, 31, 2927–2930. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Elansary, H.O.; Zin El-Abedin, T.K. Omeprazole alleviates water stress in peppermint and modulates the expression of menthol biosynthesis genes. Plant. Physiol. Biochem. 2019, 139, 578–586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Kim, J.; Wolyn, D.J. Freezing tolerance assessment for seedlings of three asparagus cultivars grown under controlled conditions. Can. J. Plant. Sci. 2014, 95, 495–504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Pressman, E.; Schaffer, A.A.; Compton, D.; Zamski, E. Carbohydrate Content of Young Asparagus Plants as Affected by Temperature Regimes. Plant Physiol. 1994, 143, 621–624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Elansary, H.O.; Yessoufou, K. Growth regulators and mowing heights enhance the morphological and physiological performance of Seaspray turfgrass during drought conditions. Acta Physiol. Plant. 2015, 37, 232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Elansary, H.O.; Skalicka-Wozniak, K.; King, I.W. Enhancing stress growth traits as well as phytochemical and antioxidant contents of Spiraea and Pittosporum under seaweed extract treatments. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2016, 105, 310–320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Radyukina, N.L.; Shashukova, A.V.; Makarova, S.S.; Kuznetsov, V.V. Exogenous proline modifies differential expression of superoxide dismutase genes in UV-B-irradiated Salvia officinalis plants. Russ. J. Plant Physiol. 2011, 58, 51–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Plants 08 00585 g001 550
Figure 1. Rosemary mean morphological parameters following 5-aminolevulinic acid (ALA) treatment (3, 5, and 10 ppm) and Alternaria dauci and Rhizoctonia solani inoculations in different soils (A and B). Different letters within treatment indicate significant differences.
Figure 1. Rosemary mean morphological parameters following 5-aminolevulinic acid (ALA) treatment (3, 5, and 10 ppm) and Alternaria dauci and Rhizoctonia solani inoculations in different soils (A and B). Different letters within treatment indicate significant differences.
Plants 08 00585 g001
Plants 08 00585 g002 550
Figure 2. Total antioxidant activities of rosemary essential oils and leaf extracts following ALA treatment (3, 5, and 10 ppm) and Alternaria dauci and Rhizoctonia solani inoculations in different soils (A and B). Different letters within treatment indicate significant differences.
Figure 2. Total antioxidant activities of rosemary essential oils and leaf extracts following ALA treatment (3, 5, and 10 ppm) and Alternaria dauci and Rhizoctonia solani inoculations in different soils (A and B). Different letters within treatment indicate significant differences.
Plants 08 00585 g002
Plants 08 00585 g003 550
Figure 3. Catalase (CAT) and superoxide dismutase (SOD) enzymes activities in rosemary plants subjected to ALA treatment (3, 5, and 10 ppm) and Alternaria dauci and Rhizoctonia solani inoculations in different soils (A and B). Data are means ± SD (n = 3). Different letters within treatment indicate significant differences.
Figure 3. Catalase (CAT) and superoxide dismutase (SOD) enzymes activities in rosemary plants subjected to ALA treatment (3, 5, and 10 ppm) and Alternaria dauci and Rhizoctonia solani inoculations in different soils (A and B). Data are means ± SD (n = 3). Different letters within treatment indicate significant differences.
Plants 08 00585 g003
Plants 08 00585 g004 550
Figure 4. The mean of total phenolic, chlorophylls, carbohydrates, and proline in rosemary leaves following ALA treatment (3, 5, and 10 ppm) and Alternaria dauci and Rhizoctonia solani inoculations in different soils (A and B). Different letters within treatment indicate significant differences.
Figure 4. The mean of total phenolic, chlorophylls, carbohydrates, and proline in rosemary leaves following ALA treatment (3, 5, and 10 ppm) and Alternaria dauci and Rhizoctonia solani inoculations in different soils (A and B). Different letters within treatment indicate significant differences.
Plants 08 00585 g004
Plants 08 00585 g005 550
Figure 5. Mean values of rosemary photosynthetic rate (Pn, μmol CO2 m−2 s−1), transpiration rate (E, mmol m−2 s−1), and stomatal conductance (gs, mmol m−2 s−1), as affected by ALA treatment (3, 5, and 10 ppm) and Alternaria dauci and Rhizoctonia solani inoculations in different soils (A and B). Different letters within treatment indicate significant differences.
Figure 5. Mean values of rosemary photosynthetic rate (Pn, μmol CO2 m−2 s−1), transpiration rate (E, mmol m−2 s−1), and stomatal conductance (gs, mmol m−2 s−1), as affected by ALA treatment (3, 5, and 10 ppm) and Alternaria dauci and Rhizoctonia solani inoculations in different soils (A and B). Different letters within treatment indicate significant differences.
Plants 08 00585 g005
Plants 08 00585 g006 550
Figure 6. Leaf midday water potential and relative water content in rosemary plants subjected to ALA treatment (3, 5, and 10 ppm) and Alternaria dauci and Rhizoctonia solani inoculations in different soils (A and B). Data are means ± SD (n = 3). Different letters within treatment indicate significant differences.
Figure 6. Leaf midday water potential and relative water content in rosemary plants subjected to ALA treatment (3, 5, and 10 ppm) and Alternaria dauci and Rhizoctonia solani inoculations in different soils (A and B). Data are means ± SD (n = 3). Different letters within treatment indicate significant differences.
Plants 08 00585 g006
Plants 08 00585 g007 550
Figure 7. Gene expression levels of DREB2 and ERF3(C) in rosemary plants subjected to ALA treatment (3, 5, and 10 ppm) and Alternaria dauci and Rhizoctonia solani inoculations in different soils (A and B). Data are means ± SD (n = 3). Different letters within treatment indicate significant differences.
Figure 7. Gene expression levels of DREB2 and ERF3(C) in rosemary plants subjected to ALA treatment (3, 5, and 10 ppm) and Alternaria dauci and Rhizoctonia solani inoculations in different soils (A and B). Data are means ± SD (n = 3). Different letters within treatment indicate significant differences.
Plants 08 00585 g007
Plants 08 00585 g008 550
Figure 8. Gene expression levels of FeSOD, Cu/ZnSOD, and MnSOD in rosemary plants subjected to ALA treatment (3, 5, and 10 ppm) and Alternaria dauci and Rhizoctonia solani inoculations in different soils (A and B). Data are means ± SD (n = 3). Different letters within treatment indicate significant differences.
Figure 8. Gene expression levels of FeSOD, Cu/ZnSOD, and MnSOD in rosemary plants subjected to ALA treatment (3, 5, and 10 ppm) and Alternaria dauci and Rhizoctonia solani inoculations in different soils (A and B). Data are means ± SD (n = 3). Different letters within treatment indicate significant differences.
Plants 08 00585 g008
Table
Table 1. Rosemary mean essential oil composition (2019) following ALA treatment (3, 5, and 10 ppm) and Alternaria dauci and Rhizoctonia solani inoculations in different soils (A and B). * Different letters within treatment indicate significant differences.
Table 1. Rosemary mean essential oil composition (2019) following ALA treatment (3, 5, and 10 ppm) and Alternaria dauci and Rhizoctonia solani inoculations in different soils (A and B). * Different letters within treatment indicate significant differences.
Soil TypeALA
(ppm)		1,8-cineole RI = 1040Linalool
RI = 1117		Camphor
RI = 1139		Borneol
RI = 1188
(control)A013.51c *5.32d11.02d10.68d
B014.12bc5.49d11.52cd10.98cd
A314.0bc5.94c11.53cd11.21c
B314.25b6.23b11.89c11.43c
A515.34ab6.12b12.23b12.11b
B515.71a6.35b12.61b12.59ab
A1015.82a7.12a13.19a12.86a
B1015.91a7.35a13.76a12.98a
Alternaria dauciA014.53c6.24d13.14d12.14b
B014.92c6.35d13.35cd12.26b
A315.04bc7.46c13.59c13.34ab
B315.61b7.51c13.75c13.45a
A516.11ab8.24b14.22b13.61a
B516.61a8.41ab14.54a13.75a
A1016.91a8.56a14.86a13.88a
B1016.85a8.74a14.94a13.91a
Rhizoctonia solaniA013.23d5.84e12.02c11.01c
B013.62c6.03e12.66c11.32c
A314.08c6.54d13.43b12.32b
B314.52bc6.68d13.79b12.45b
A515.04b7.11c14.31a12.85b
B515.64a7.46b14.46a13.34a
A1015.81a7.71a14.64a13.81a
B1016.14a8.01a14.84a13.85a
Table
Table 2. Physiochemical properties of soils used. A (30% sand + 70% loam) and B (100% loam soil).
Table 2. Physiochemical properties of soils used. A (30% sand + 70% loam) and B (100% loam soil).
CompositionLoam + 30% SandLoamLSD p = 0.05
pH
EC (mmho cm−1)
Water holding capacity (%)
Soil organic carbon (SOC, %)		8.1
0.954
33.5
0.41		8
0.986
45.1
0.52		0.12
0.31
2.2
0.02
Nitrogen (N, g ha−1)162 × 103190 × 1033.5
Phosphorus (P, g ha−1)15.69 × 10318.4 × 1031.2
Potassium (K, g ha−1)146.2 × 103199.5 × 1033.2
Iron (Fe, mg kg−1)4.14.60.1
Copper (Cu, mg kg−1)0.350.420.05
Zink (Zn, mg kg−1)3.55.10.06
Manganese (Mn, mg kg−1)2.82.90.05

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Elansary, H.O.; El-Ansary, D.O.; Al-Mana, F.A. 5-Aminolevulinic Acid and Soil Fertility Enhance the Resistance of Rosemary to Alternaria dauci and Rhizoctonia solani and Modulate Plant Biochemistry. Plants 2019, 8, 585. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants8120585

AMA Style

Elansary HO, El-Ansary DO, Al-Mana FA. 5-Aminolevulinic Acid and Soil Fertility Enhance the Resistance of Rosemary to Alternaria dauci and Rhizoctonia solani and Modulate Plant Biochemistry. Plants. 2019; 8(12):585. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants8120585

Chicago/Turabian Style

Elansary, Hosam O., Diaa O. El-Ansary, and Fahed A. Al-Mana. 2019. "5-Aminolevulinic Acid and Soil Fertility Enhance the Resistance of Rosemary to Alternaria dauci and Rhizoctonia solani and Modulate Plant Biochemistry" Plants 8, no. 12: 585. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants8120585

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop