Next Article in Journal
Polyphenol Compounds and Biological Activity of Caper (Capparis spinosa L.) Flowers Buds
Next Article in Special Issue
Role of Jasmonic Acid Pathway in Tomato Plant-Pseudomonas syringae Interaction
Previous Article in Journal
First Report on Evaluation of Basic Nutritional and Antioxidant Properties of Moringa Oleifera Lam. from Caribbean Island of Saint Lucia
Previous Article in Special Issue
Integrated Use of Aureobasidium pullulans Strain CG163 and Acibenzolar-S-Methyl for Management of Bacterial Canker in Kiwifruit
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Plants
Volume 8
Issue 12
10.3390/plants8120538
plants-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Preventive Effects of Fluoro-Substituted Benzothiadiazole Derivatives and Chitosan Oligosaccharide against the Rice Seedling Blight Induced by Fusarium oxysporum

by
Bo Ma
1,2,
Junhe Wang
2,
Chuanzeng Liu
2,
Jifang Hu
2,
Kefei Tan
2,
Fuyang Zhao
2,
Ming Yuan
2,
Junhua Zhang
1,* and
Zhijia Gai
3
1
College of Agriculture, Northeast Agricultural University, Harbin 150030, China
2
Qiqihar Branch of Heilongjiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Qiqihar 161006, China
3
Jiamusi Branch of Heilongjiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Jiamusi 154007, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Plants 2019, 8(12), 538; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants8120538
Submission received: 15 October 2019 / Revised: 21 November 2019 / Accepted: 22 November 2019 / Published: 24 November 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Induced Resistance (IR) of Plants)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Rice seedling blight, caused by Fusarium oxysporum, significantly affects global rice production levels. Fluoro-substituted benzothiadiazole derivatives (FBT) and chitosan oligosaccharide (COS) are elicitors that can enhance plant resistance to pathogen infection. However, there is a lack of information regarding FBT and COS used as elicitors in rice seedlings blight. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of FBT and COS treatments on rice seedling blight and elucidate the molecular mechanisms of the two elicitors for inducing resistance using proteomic technique. Results indicated that FBT and COS significantly reduced the disease incidence and index, and relived the root growth inhibition caused by F. oxysporum (p < 0.05). Biochemical analyses demonstrated that these two elicitors effectively enhanced activities of defense enzymes. Moreover, the proteomic results of rice root tissues disclosed more differentially expressed proteins in diterpenoid biosynthesis pathway that were particularly stimulated by two elicitors compared to the other pathways studied, resulting in the accumulation of antimicrobial substance, momilactone. Findings of this study could provide sound theoretical basis for further applications of FBT and COS used as rice elicitors against seedling blight.

1. Introduction

Rice (Oryza sativa L.) is an important global cereal crops that provides a stable food supply for more than 5 billion people worldwide. Most Asian diets include rice as a main dish [1]. Although global rice demand is on the rise, its productivity is constrained by disease outbreaks. One major fungal disease that occurs during the nursery and field planting stages is the rice seedling blight. Grain yield losses due to seedling blight infection ranges from 8 to 50% depending on severity of the disease, stage of the crop at which it was infected by the fungus, and overall environmental conditions [2,3,4]. Although several species belonging to Fusarium, Rhizoctonia and Rhizopus groups have been isolated from infected roots to cause seedling blight [5,6,7]. Among these fungus, the Fusarium genus was regarded as the major pathogens of rice seedling blight in China [8,9]. Thus, as a wide-ranging pathogens, Fusarium oxysporum was usually selected to induce seedling blight by many researchers [10,11].
Rice seedling blight is still treated using fungicides such as imazalil, tolclofos-methyl, fenaminosulf, liturium, and hymexazol, which are arguably effective against Fusarium oxysporum [12,13]. Due to growing environmental and health concerns, the need for eco-friendly alternatives to control this disease has become imperative [14,15].
In response to pathogens infection, plants can amass an array of formidable defense pathways using a variety of biological, chemical, or physical agents, which are known as resistance inducers or elicitors [16,17,18]. An earlier study showed that treating host plants with elicitors can increase secretion of defense-regulating enzymes such as phenylalanine ammonia lyase (PAL), peroxidase (POD), superoxide dismutase (SOD) and catalase (CAT) [19]. While PAL regulates host response to biotic and abiotic stress levels by increasing phenolic acids and phytoalexin production via the phenylpropanoid pathway, POD, SOD and CAT lower oxidative stress by acting as ROS scavengers [20]. Compared with other traditional disease control methods, the elicitors not only prevent plant injury but also reduce residue of chemicals in agricultural. It has features of low pollution, long duration and minimal side effects on crop quality. Therefore, it is an innovative approach to manage rice seedling blight [21,22].
Fluoro-substituted benzothiadiazole derivatives (FBT) is a novel elicitor similar to benzothiadiazole (BTH) structure, which was invented in China [23]. It can effectively induce high levels of defense mechanisms in many kinds of vegetable crops against soil-borne disease, as well as in the Chinese cabbage caused by Plasmodiophora brassicae [24]. Chitosan oligosaccharide (COS) derivatived from chitosan, has recently been shown to be an ideal delivery material of the elicitors regulating disease response and defense action [25,26]. In comparison to chitosan, COS is easily water-soluble and has good physio-chemical properties, qualifying it as a potential plant bio-vaccine. Thus, it is of prime interest to agricultural researchers [27]. In spite of these promising features, detailed molecular studies showing the use of FBT and COS in mitigating rice seedling blight are scarce.
The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of FBT and COS treatments on F. oxysporum and elucidate the underlying molecular mechanisms by which they induce resistance against rice seedling blight using proteomics. It is anticipated that these findings will give further insights into the theory and application for FBT and COS as elicitors inducers for treating rice seedling blight.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Plant Growth Conditions

Rice (Oryza sativa L.) seeds (‘Qijing 2’), highly susceptible to blight, were obtained from the Rice research laboratory, Qiqihar branch of Heilongjiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences. Firstly, seed surfaces were disinfected with 70% ethanol for 1 min to achieve surface disinfection, subsequently incubated in 25 °C incubator until they sprouted to 5 mm, and finally washed with water and planted in 16 cm-diameter holes. All cultivations were cultivated in soil in the greenhouse of day 26 °C/night 20 °C with a 16 h light/8 h dark regime. The light intensity was 6000 LX.

2.2. Pathogen Inoculation

Standard pathogenic strain of F. oxysporum FO2016038 was provided by the Institute of Rice Research of the Northeast Agricultural University, Harbin, China. The pathogen was cultured on potato dextrose agar (PDA) medium at 4 °C. Conidial suspensions of the pathogen were prepared by flooding the 7-day-old culture dishes and incubated at 25 °C with sterile distilled water containing 0.1% Tween-20. The resulting zoospore concentration was adjusted to 1 × 106 spores/mL with sterile distilled water using a hemocytometer to prepare the inoculum.

2.3. Elicitor Treatment and Sampling

Rice seedlings at 2-leaf stage were treated with 10 mL of one of three following elicitors by surface spraying: (1) sterile distilled water as the control (CK), (2) 50 mg/L FBT (1,2,3-benzothiadiazole-7-carboxylic acid-2,2,2-trifluoroethyl ester, purchased from Shanghai Taihe Chemical Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China) solution or (3) 100 mg/L COS (molecular mass: 1500–3000 Da, purchased from Hainan Zhengye Zhongnong High-tech Co., Ltd., Hainan, China) solution. After 2 days, they were then inoculated with 10 mL of conidial suspension (1 × 106 spores/mL) by root-dip technique. Afterwards, tissue samples were immediately preserved in liquid nitrogen and stored at −80 °C until further analysis.

2.4. Efficiency of FBT and COS to Elicit Resistance against Seedling Blight

Disease incidence, disease index and root growth were determined at 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 and 7 d after inoculation of conidial suspension. There are three replicates with 30 plants per replicate, and the experiment was conducted thrice. The disease investigation was performed as previously described by Wang et al. (Wang et al., 2009) (Table S1). The following formulas were used to determine the disease incidence and disease index, respectively:
Disease   incidence   ( % )   =   No .   of   diseased   plants   No .   of   total   investigated   plants   ×   100 %
Disease   index   =   Σ No .   of   diseased   plants   ×   grade   No .   of   total   investigated   plants   ×   the   highest   grade   ×   100
Water on the surface of rice root was absorbed by filter paper, then it was dried at 105 °C for 15 min and baked to constant weight at 70 °C to determine the root dry weight. Root length, root surface area and root volume were measured with Epson root scanner and analyzed by WinRHIZO software.

2.5. Effect of FBT and OCT on Enzymatic Activity of Root

2.5.1. Superoxide Dismutase (SOD) Assay

The activity of SOD was determined by measuring the inhibition of nitroblue tetrazolium (NBT) as earlier described by Beauchamp and Fridovich [28]. Briefly, fresh sample (0.5 g) was taken and 5 mL of 50 mM pre-cooled potassium phosphate buffer (pH 7.0) was added to extract the crude SOD enzyme solution. Afterwards a reaction mixture (9 mL) was prepared using the following −50 mM phosphate buffer (pH 7.8), 13 mM methionine, 75 μM NBT, 0.1 mM EDTA, 150 μL enzyme extract and 2 μM riboflavin which was added at the end. 3 mL of this mixture was poured in a tube, stirred and placed 30 cm below two 15 W fluorescent lamps. Reaction was induced by switching on the lamps for 15 min and stopped by switching off the lamps and placing a black cloth over the reaction tube. The control reaction mixture had no color. Reaction mixture absorbance was read at 560 nm. One unit of activity was defined as the amount of enzyme required to inhibit 50% of the NBT reduction rate in the controls containing no enzymes.

2.5.2. Peroxidase (POD) Assay

POD activity was measured by following the method of Hammerschmidt et al. [29]. Fresh samples (0.5 g) were taken and 5 mL of 10 mM pre-cooled potassium phosphate buffer (pH 6.9) was added to extract the crude POD enzyme solution. Then, a reaction mixture consisted of 0.25% v/v guaiacol in 10 mM potassium phosphate buffer (pH 6.0) containing 100 mM hydrogen peroxide of which 3 mL was subsequently used. The crude enzyme (10 μL) was added to initiate the reaction and POD activity was evaluated using a spectrophotometer at a wavelength of 470 nm. The results were expressed on fresh weight basis as units (U) g−1. One unit of POD activity was defined as the amount of enzyme that causes an increase of 0.01 in the absorbance per minute at 470 nm.

2.5.3. Catalase (CAT) Assay

The method of Bailly et al. [30] was used to determine CAT activity. Briefly, fresh samples (0.5 g) were taken and 5 mL of 100 mM pre-cooled potassium phosphate buffer (pH 7.0) was added to extract the crude CAT enzyme solution. The reaction mixture contained 3 mL of phosphate buffer along with 40 µL crude CAT extract was initiated by adding 40 µL of 10 mM H2O2. The activity of CAT was measured using a spectrophotometer (Hitachi U 2000, Tokyo, Japan) at 240 nm. CAT activity was expressed in terms of the change in absorbance at 240 nm in the linear phase of the slope (D240 min−1 g−1 fresh weight).

2.5.4. Phenylalanine Ammonia-Lyase (PAL) Assay

The PAL activity was determined as earlier described by Beaudoin-Eagan and Thorpe [31]. Briefly, PAL enzyme was extracted with 5 mL of 25 mM pre-cooled Tris HCl buffer from 0.5 g fresh samples. Afterwards, 100 µL of the extracted enzyme was mixed with 900 µL of 50 mM L-Phenylalanine and 100 mM Tris HCl buffer solution (pH 8.01). Reaction was initiated by placing this mixture in a water bath at 40 °C for 2 h and stopped using 60 µL of 5 N HCl. The results were expressed on fresh weight basis as units (U) g−1. One unit of PAL acivity was defined as the amount of enzyme that causes an increase of 0.01 in the absorbance at 290 nm in 1 min.

2.6. Quantitative Analysis of Global Proteome

2.6.1. Protein Sample Preparation

The detailed description of protein sample preparation including trypsin Digestion, tandem mass tags (TMT) labeling and HPLC fractionation can be found in the Supplementary Materials.

2.6.2. Liquid Chromatography Tandem Mass Spectrometry (LC−MS/MS) Analysis

Details of this procedure is available in the Supplementary Materials. Briefly, peptides were dissolved in 0.1% FA, directly loaded onto a reversed-phase pre-column (Acclaim PepMap 100, Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, China). Peptide separation was performed using a reversed-phase analytical column (Acclaim PepMap RSLC, Thermo Scientific). The peptides were subjected to NSI source followed by tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS) in Q ExactiveTM plus (Thermo Scientific) coupled online to the UPLC. The mass spectrometry proteomics data have been deposited to the ProteomeXchange Consortium (http://proteomecentral.proteomexchange.org) via the iProX partner repository [32] with the dataset identifier PXD014979.

2.6.3. Protein Identification and Screening of Differentially Expressed Proteins (DEPs)

The resulting MS/MS data were processed using Maxquant search engine software (v.1.5.2.8). Tandem mass spectra were searched against Phaffia_rhodozyma database concatenated with reverse decoy database. The Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) database was used to identify enriched pathways by a two-tailed Fisher’s exact test to test the enrichment of the DEPs against all identified proteins. Correction for multiple hypothesis testing was carried out using standard false discovery rate control methods. The pathway with a corrected p-value < 0.05 was considered significant. These pathways were classified into hierarchical categories according to the KEGG website. Cluster membership (Pearson algorithm) was constructed by a heat map using the “heatmap.2” function from the “gplots” R-package.

2.7. Determination of Momilactone in Rice Root

Momilactone was measured by following the method of Kato-Noguchi et al. [33]. Briefly, rice root (5 g fresh weight) was homogenized with 50 mL of 80% (v/v) aqueous methanol and the homogenate was filtered through filter paper. The residue was homogenized again with 50 mL of methanol and filtered. The two filtrates were combined and evaporated in vacuo at 35 °C to give an aqueous residue. After evaporation, the methanol fraction was dissolved in 50% aqueous methanol (2 mL, v/v) and loaded onto a reverse-phase C18 Sep-Pak cartridge (Waters, Milford, MA, USA). The cartridge was first eluted with 50% aqueous methanol (15 mL) to remove impurities, and then with methanol (20 mL) to release momilactone. Momilactone was quantified by measuring its peak height on the chromatogram of High Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC) as described by Kato-Noguchi et al. [34].

2.8. Confirmation of the Infection-Responsive Expression Profiles by qRT-PCR

To validate the proteomic data results, qRT-PCR analysis was performed on 9 proteomic samples. Several genes that were co-expressed in both cultivars were analyzed by qRT-PCR at CK, FBT, and COS. The EASYspin Plus kit (Aidlab, Beijing, China) was used to extract the RNA of all samples following the manufacturer’s instructions, and 500 ng RNA was used for cDNA synthesis using the SuperScript III First-Strand Synthesis System for RT-PCR (Gene Denovo Biotechnology Co. Guangzhou, China) using Oligo(dT)20 primer. qRT-PCR reactions were run on the ABI PRISMTM 7900HT Fast Real-Time PCR System (ABI) using SYRB® GreenERTM qPCR SuperMix (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA). Reverse transcription was performed using 500 ng of RQ1 DNase (Promega, Madison, WI, USA)-treated total RNA, oligo dT and SuperScript III reverse transcriptase from the Invitrogen’s First-Strand cDNA Synthesis Kit according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The first-strand cDNA reaction was diluted 20 folds prior to qPCR and 5 μL of diluted cDNA was used as the PCR template. Reverse transcriptase negative controls were implemented for each PCR reaction to ensure that there is no genomic DNA contamination. The primer sequences used were shown in Table S2. Ct values were determined based on two biological replicates each with two technical replicates. Relative expression levels of target genes were calculated using the ΔΔCt method [35] and with the housekeeping gene EF1α mRNA as an internal standard.

2.9. Statistical Analysis

All values obtained were expressed as mean ± standard deviation (SD). All experiments were performed at least thrice using independent assays. The statistical significance of data comparisons was determined using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), followed by Duncan’s multiple range test. Values of p < 0.05 were considered to be statistically significant.

3. Results

3.1. Efficacy of FBT and COS on Control of Seedling Blight

As shown in Figure 1, the disease incidence and index in the rice roots of all groups were gradually increased following F. oxysporum inoculation (Figure 1). Compared with the control root, FBT and COS significantly (p < 0.05) reduced the disease incidence and development of disease symptoms caused by F. oxysporum.

3.2. Effect of FBT and COS on Growth Status of Root

As shown in Figure 2, there were no significant differences (p > 0.05) in root length, root surface area, root volume and root dry weight between two treatments with the control during the first 2 days after F. oxysporum incubation, respectively. However, after 4 d of incubation of pathogen, FBT and COS significantly (p < 0.05) increased the value of these parameters compared to the control root.

3.3. Effect of FBT and COS on Enzymatic Activities of Root

3.3.1. Superoxide Dismutase (SOD) Assay

Root samples with and without elicitors had SOD activity. At all observed time intervals, SOD activity was significantly (p < 0.05) higher in FBT and COS-treated roots than that in control. In all root samples, the general trend was that SOD activity initially increased but subsequently decreased and peaked at day 4 of pathogen incubation (Figure 3A).

3.3.2. Peroxidase (POD) Assay

Similar to the activity of SOD, the results of POD activity showed that all root groups with and without elicitors had POD activity, and it was significantly (p < 0.05) higher in FBT and COS-treated roots compared to control at all the observed time intervals. In FBT-treated roots, POD activity gradually increased and peaked at day 3, whereas, it appeared as a bimodal curve in COS-treated roots. Furthermore, POD activity in FBT-treated roots was higher than that in COS-treated roots at all tested time points except day 3 (Figure 3B), indicating that FBT had a better effect than COS throughout the study test time.

3.3.3. Catalase (CAT) Assay

All roots with or without elicitors showed CAT activity. At all tested time points, CAT activity was significantly (p < 0.05) higher in FBT and COS-treated roots compared to the control root. The maximum CAT activity was found at 4 days in all the tested roots. Moreover, it was 1.33 and 1.26 fold higher in FBT and COS-treated roots than that in the control roots, respectively (Figure 3C). These findings were inconsistent with the results of peroxidase assay.

3.3.4. Phenylalanine Ammonia-Lyase (PAL) Assay

Similar to previous assays, PAL activity occurred in all root categories with or without elicitors. Results showed that PAL activity was triggered by FBT and COS in root after inoculation of F. oxysporum, which was significantly (p < 0.05) higher than that in the control root (Figure 3D). These results indicated that the two elicitors could alleviate the rice seedling blight by regulating phenylpropanoid pathway.

3.4. Proteomic Characteristics of All Samples

To study variations in protein regulation in root samples induced by the two elicitors to resist F. oxysporum, TMT labling LC-MS/MS proteomic approach was used to measure the protein expression in rice roots after F. oxysporum inoculation. As shown in Figure 4, high correlations were observed among three replicates in the experimental and control groups with each other (R2 > 0.85), but correlation within treatment groups were lower. This suggested that protein expression profiles between biological replicates was consistent, and different protein expression profiles were likely in response to different kinds of elicitors.

3.5. Differential Expression and Biological Pathway Enrichment Analysis

Here, 922 and 1323 differentially expressed proteins (DEPs) were identified in FBT and COS-treated roots, respectively, compared with those in the control root after F. oxysporum inoculation. Moreover, 501 up-regulated proteins and 421 down-regulated proteins were identified between the FBT-treated root and the control root (Figure 5A), a total of 677 up-regulated genes and 646 down-regulated genes were found between the COS-treated root and the control root (Figure 5B).
The pathways that were enriched in the treated roots compared to the control roots are shown in Figure 6. FBT-treated roots had 150 DEPs out of 922 and these were assigned to 9 biological pathway annotations: ‘diterpenoid biosynthesis’, ‘biosynthesis of secondary metabolites’, ‘phenylpropanoid biosynthesis’, ‘glutathione metabolism’, ‘tyrosine metabolism’, ‘terpenoid backbone biosynthesis’, ‘alpha-linolenic acid metabolism’, ‘cutin, suberine and wax biosynthesis’ and ‘sulfur metabolism’ (Figure 6A). On the other hand, out of 1323 DEPs identified in COS-treated roots, 187 were assigned to 14 enrichment pathways: ‘diterpenoid biosynthesis’, ‘photosynthesis’, ‘phenylpropanoid biosynthesis’, ‘photosynthesis-antenna proteins’, ‘cutin, suberine and wax biosynthesis’, ‘glutathione metabolism’, ‘alpha-Linolenic acid metabolism’, ‘glyoxylate and dicarboxylate metabolism’, ‘AGE-RAGE signaling pathway in diabetic complications’, ‘zeatin biosynthesis’, nitrogen metabolism’, ‘valine, leucine and isoleucine’, and ‘tyrosine metabolism’ (Figure 6B). Interestingly, the ‘diterpenoid biosynthesis’ pathway, having the smallest Q value, was shown to be significantly enriched in both FBT and COS treatments compared to the other pathways. Furthermore, ‘diterpenoid biosynthesis’, ‘alpha-Linolenic acid metabolism’, ‘phenylpropanoid biosynthesis’, ‘cutin, suberine and wax biosynthesis’ and ‘tyrosine metabolism’ were shared by the two groups, implying that FBT and COS may have the same molecular mechanisms in the induction of resistance in rice seedling blight.

3.6. Specific Pathway of Diterpenoid Biosynthesis Analysis

Compared to the control root, the diterpenoid biosynthesis pathway in the COS-treated roots contained eight DEPs (Figure 7). These include two ent-copalyl diphosphate synthases [EC:5.5.1.13] (Os02t0571100-01 and Os02t0570900-00), an ent-cassa-12,15-diene synthase [EC:4.2.3.28] (Os02t0570400-01), a ent-kaurene oxidase [EC:1.14.14.86] (Os06t0569500-01), two ent-cassa-12,15-diene 11-hydroxylases [EC:1.14.14.112] (Os02t0569900-01 and Os02t0569400-01), a sandaracopimaradiene/labdatriene synthase [EC:4.2.3.29 4.2.3.99] (Os12t0491800-01), a syn-copalyl-diphosphate synthase [EC:5.5.1.14] (Os04t0178300-02), a 9-beta-pimara-7,15-diene oxidase [EC:1.14.14.111] (Os04t0178400-01), and a momilactone-A synthase [EC:1.1.1.295] (Os04t0179200-01). In addition, a stemar-13-ene synthase [EC:4.2.3.33] (Os11t0474800-01) and a syn-pimara-7,15-diene synthase [EC:4.2.3.35] (Os04t0179700-01) were found in the FBT-treated treated roots compared to the control root (Figure 7B). These results show that all DEPs were upregulated in both treatments.
In order to confirm the prediction made by the proteomic changes, the level of momilactone in rice root in all groups was measured by HPLC. As shown in Figure 8, compared with the control group, FBT and COS treatment significantly (p < 0.05) increased the concentrations of momilactone in the roots. Furthermore, it in the FBT-treated roots was higher than that in the COS-treated roots. This result was consistent with the profile of proteomics.

3.7. Confirm Unigenes Expression Using Real-Time Quantitative Reverse Transcription PCR

Quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR) was performed to validate our earlier obtained proteomics results. Here, eight DEPs, which are in the diterpenoid biosynthesis pathway-ent-copalyl diphosphate synthases, ent-cassa-12,15-diene synthase, ent-kaurene oxidase, ent-cassa-12,15-diene 11-hydroxylases, sandaracopimaradiene/labdatriene synthase, syn-copalyl-diphosphate synthase, 9-beta-pimara-7,15-diene oxidase and momilactone-A synthase. After confirming our results, all selected 8 DEPs exhibited similar expression patterns as observed in proteomic data, demonstrating that proteomic results were accurate in this study (Figure 9).

4. Discussion

In response to numerous pathogen attacks, plants amass a formidable defense system by using a number of biotic and abiotic resources that serve as elicitors, a defense strategy largely known as induced resistance [36,37]. This type of defense strategy has garnered tremendous research interests because it is not harmful to humans and poses no threat to the environment. It is a safe approach in combating a host of plant diseases [38,39]. Therefore, the present study aims to elucidate the resistance-eliciting efficiency of the FBT and COS treatments against rice seedling blight from biochemical and molecular perspectives.
In this study, FBT and COS treatments significantly reduced both disease incidence and index (Figure 1). This suggests that FBT and COS could be potential elicitors that increase rice resistance to F. oxysporum attack. FBT and COS treatments also prevented root inhibition caused by this fungus. (Figure 2). In addition, there was a corresponding increase in the activities of defense enzymes, such as POD, SOD, CAT and PAL (Figure 3). Among these enzymes, POD, SOD and CAT are important components of antioxidant systems to develop a broad range of defense responses to cope with pathogenic infections [40]. POD plays an important role in generating H2O2 as part of the defense response and confers resistance to a wide range of plant pathogens [41]. A previous study also found that POD is implicated in the polymerization of monolignols into lignin and cell wall reinforcements after pathogen attack [42]. SOD can transform superoxide radical anions (O2−) to H2O2 [28], CAT can turn H2O2 into water in plant cell [43]. PAL plays a critical role in the phenylpropanoid pathway and in the response and regulation of biotic and abiotic stresses [44,45]. Our results showed that FBT and COS could increase the activities of POD, SOD, CAT and PAL (Figure 3), these results were in line with previous investigations. Similarly, it was reported that at all tested time points, the activities of POD, SOD and CAT was significantly higher in chitosan nano-treated seedlings compared to the pathogen-inoculated seedlings in pearl millet cultivars [26]. In a related study, chitosan acted as an elicitor to increase CAT activity, giving improved systemic resistance of potato tuber [46]. The phenylpropanoid biosynthesis pathway was also recently implicated in resistance conferment among citrus fruit samples in response to three elicitors—Salicylic acid, Pichia membranaefaciens and oligochitosan [25]. The above fingdings established the basis that FBT and COS could be used as elicitors to promote increases in the potential immunity of rice to ameliorate seedling blight.
In recent years, proteomic techniques have been increasingly useful in gene screening protocols, functional genes discovery and understanding complex molecular mechanisms in the ever-evolving plant-pathogen interaction [47]. The current study used the TMT-based proteomic technique in order to mine some of the underlying molecular mechanisms by which FBT and COS induce resistance against rice seedling blight. The results of correlation coefficients showed that a good consistency of protein expression profiles between biological replicates, suggesting that our experiment designs and proteomic data were reliable (Figure 4). A total of 922 and 132 DEPs were found in FBT and COS-treated roots, respectively, compared with those in the control roots after F. oxysporum inoculation, indicating that dfifferent kinds of elicitors are likely in response to different protein expression profiles (Figure 5). In addition, the KEGG database (two-tailed Fisher’s exact test) was used to assess DEP functions. Our results showed that 14 and 9 enriched pathways were observed in FBT and COS-treated roots after F. oxysporum inoculation (Figure 6).
Based on Q value, the diterpenoid biosynthesis pathway was thus selected for further study and results show that all DEPs enriched into this pathway were up-regulated in FBT and COS-treated roots (Figure 7), resulting in the increased secretion of momilactone (Figure 8). As an allelochemical in rice and moss plants with a 19, 6 β-lactone structure [48,49], Momilactone (A and B) has been proposed as environmentally-safe fungicidal and bacteriostatic agents [50]. Previous studies on its antifungal properties against the highly destructive rice blast pathogen Piricularia oryzae [49,51], as well as an integral part of the defense system of the moss Hypnum plumaeforme [52,53,54,55], strongly support the findings of the present study. In addition, momilactones A and B significantly suppressed F. oxysporum and F. solani activities in vitro [56]. Although the biological importance of momilactones and its defense role in rice and mosses have been abundantly reported in the past, it was not until recently that the molecular basis for some of these functionalities were unraveled [57,58,59,60,61]. This resulted in Momilactose (A and B) being officially patented as non-chemical herbicides a little over a decade ago, giving more credence to their value in green agriculture research [62]. The present study demonstrates that the activation of the diterpenoid biosynthesis pathway plays an important role in resistance induction against rice seedling blight using FBT and COS treatments. More so, the terpenoid biosynthesis pathway can regulate the synthesis of precusor substances of momilactone. While analyses of FBT-treated roots showed DEPs upregulation in the terpenoid biosynthesis pathway (Figure S1), no upregulated proteins were found in COS-treated root. This may be the reason why there were higher resistance levels in the former compared to the latter. Finally, some POD activities were up-regulated while others were down-regulated after F. oxysporum inoculation (Table S3). Both treatments elevated PAL activities, but the expression level of PAL was not altered. The basis for this divergence is unclear at this time and thus further studies are recommended.
In summary, FBT and COS significantly reduced both the disease incidence and index, improved the growth status of root, and enhanced defense enzyme activities induced by F. oxysporum. Both elicitors significantly induced the changes of proteins involved in diterpenoid biosynthesis pathway, resulting in the increase of related enzyme activities and the accumulation of the antimicrobial substance, momilactone. It can be concluded that FBT and COS could be eco-friendly elicitors for resistance against rice seedling blight, which could significantly boost rice productivity to meet the nutritional needs of a rising global population in China.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/2223-7747/8/12/538/s1, Figure S1: Illustration of KEGG pathway of terpenoid backbone biosynthesis in oligochitosan-treated roots. Red means up-regulated proteins in FBT and COS-treated roots compared to control root, Table S1: Grading standard of rice seedlings blight, Table S2: Primer sequences of Protein for RT-qPCR, Table S3: DEPs annotated as peroxidase in FBT and COS-treated.

Author Contributions

B.M. and J.Z. conceived the study and designed the project. B.M., C.L., J.H., K.T. and F.Z. performed the experiment, analyzed the data and drafted the manuscript. J.W., M.Y. and Z.G. helped to revise the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Scientific and Technological Project of Qiqihar City of China (NYGG-201716) and the Natural Science Foundation of Heilongjiang Province of China (C2017032). And the APC was funded by C2017032.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors hereby declare that there was no conflict of interest in the present study.

References

  1. Mir, S.; Bhat, M.A.; Bashir, A.; Rashid, R.; Bano, H.; Mir, S.A. Present status and future prospects of marker assisted selection for sheath blight resistance breeding in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Skuast J. Res. 2015, 17, 72–90. [Google Scholar]
  2. Marchetti, M.; Bollich, C. Quantification of the relationship between sheath blight severity and yield loss in rice. Plant Dis. 1991, 8, 773–775. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Ochi, A.; Konishi, H.; Ando, S.; Sato, K.; Yokoyama, K.; Tsushima, S.; Yoshida, S.; Morikawa, T.; Kaneko, T.; Takahashi, H. Management of bakanae and bacterial seedling blight diseases in nurseries by irradiating rice seeds with atmospheric plasma. Plant Pathol. 2017, 66, 67–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Ou, S.H. Rice Diseases; CAB: London, UK, 1985; pp. 61–68. [Google Scholar]
  5. Niehs, S.P.; Dose, B.; Scherlach, K.; Roth, M.; Hertweck, C. Genomics-driven discovery of a symbiont-specific cyclopeptide from bacteria residing in the rice seedling blight Fungus. ChemBioChem 2018, 19, 2167–2172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Larran, S.; Siurana, M.P.S.; Caselles, J.R.; Simón, M.R.; Perelló, A. Fusarium sudanense, endophytic fungus causing typical symptoms of seedling blight and seed rot on wheat. J. King Saud Univ.-Sci. 2018, 14, 299–315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Nagamine, T.; Ozaki, K. Effects of Pythium spp. and temperature on the outbreak of damping, so-called murenae, of rice seedlings. Bull. Natl. Inst. Agrobiol. Resour. (Jpn.) 1987, 3, 89–104. [Google Scholar]
  8. Li, Y.; Zhang, X.; Zhang, R.; Liu, J.; Ali, E.; Ji, P.; Pan, H. Occurrence of seedling blight caused by Fusarium tricinctum on rice in China. Plant Dis. 2019, 103, 1789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Wang, M.; Wei, P.; Cao, M.; Zhu, L.; Lu, Y. First report of rice seedling blight caused by Burkholderia plantarii in North and Southeast China. Plant Dis. 2016, 100, 645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Chukwu, S.C.; Rafii, M.Y.; Ramlee, S.I.; Ismail, S.I.; Hasan, M.M.; Oladosu, Y.A.; Magaji, U.G.; Akos, I.; Olalekan, K.K. Bacterial leaf blight resistance in rice: A review of conventional breeding to molecular approach. Mol. Biol. Rep. 2019, 46, 1519–1532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Cheng, W.; Song, X.S.; Li, H.P.; Cao, L.H.; Sun, K.; Qiu, X.L.; Xu, Y.B.; Yang, P.; Huang, T.; Zhang, J.B. Host-induced gene silencing of an essential chitin synthase gene confers durable resistance to Fusarium head blight and seedling blight in wheat. Plant Biotechnol. J. 2016, 13, 1335–1345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Shaheen, R.; Sharif, M.Z.; Amrao, L.; Zheng, A.; Manzoor, M.; Majeed, D.; Kiran, H.; Jafir, M.; Ali, A. Investigation of bacterial leaf blight of rice through various detection tools and its impact on crop yield in punjab. Pak. J. Bot. 2019, 51, 307–312. [Google Scholar]
  13. Nasir, M.; Iqbal, B.; Hussain, M.; Mustafa, A.; Ayub, M. Chemical management of bacterial leaf blight disease in rice. J. Agric. Res. 2019, 57, 99–103. [Google Scholar]
  14. Singh, U.B.; Malviya, D.; Singh, S.; Pradhan, J.K.; Singh, B.P.; Roy, M.; Imram, M.; Pathak, N.; Baisyal, B.; Rai, J.P. Bio-protective microbial agents from rhizosphere eco-systems trigger plant defense responses provide protection against sheath blight disease in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Microbiol. Res. 2016, 192, 300–312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Rasul, M.; Yasmin, S.; Zubair, M.; Mahreen, N.; Yousaf, S.; Arif, M.; Sajid, Z.I.; Mirza, M.S. Phosphate solubilizers as antagonists for bacterial leaf blight with improved rice growth in phosphorus deficit soil. Biol. Control 2019, 136, 103997. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Walters, D.; Walsh, D.; Newton, A.; Lyon, G. Induced resistance for plant disease control: Maximizing the efficacy of resistance elicitors. Phytopathology 2005, 95, 1368–1373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Langner, T.; Kamoun, S.; Belhaj, K. CRISPR crops: Plant genome editing toward disease resistance. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 2018, 56, 479–512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Van, D.E.; Koornneef, A.; Ton, J.; Pieterse, C.M. Induced resistance-orchestrating defence mechanisms through crosstalk and priming. Annu. Plant Rev. 2018, 34, 334–370. [Google Scholar]
  19. Xing, K.; Zhu, X.; Peng, X.; Qin, S. Chitosan antimicrobial and eliciting properties for pest control in agriculture: A review. Agron. Sustain. Dev. 2015, 35, 569–588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Tan, B.A.; Daim, L.D.J.; Ithnin, N.; Ooi, T.E.K.; Md-Noh, N.; Mohamed, M.; Mohd-Yusof, H.; Appleton, D.R.; Kulaveerasingam, H. Expression of phenylpropanoid and flavonoid pathway genes in oil palm roots during infection by Ganoderma boninense. Plant Gene 2016, 7, 11–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Zhang, L.; Qingsong, W.; Limei, W.; Zhiming, Z.; Saijin, W. Effects of agro-antibiotic 211 on related substances inducing rice resistance to sheath blight. Plant Dis. Pests 2019, 10, 28–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Kano, A.; Gomi, K.; Yamasaki-Kokudo, Y.; Satoh, M.; Fukumoto, T.; Ohtani, K.; Tajima, S.; Izumori, K.; Tanaka, K.; Ishida, Y.A. A rare sugar, D-allose, confers resistance to rice bacterial blight with upregulation of defense-related genes in Oryza sativa. Phytopathology 2010, 100, 85–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Zhou, H.; Yang, L.; Stuart, A.C.; Price, S.C.; Liu, D.S.; You, P.D.W. Development of fluorinated benzothiadiazole as a structural unit for a polymer solar cell of 7% efficiency. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2011, 50, 2995–2998. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Han, Z.; Xie, X.; Jin, Z.; Song, J.; Chai, A.; Shi, Y.; Li, B. Systemic Resistance Induced by fluoro-substituted benzothiadiazole derivatives against Plasmodiophora brassicae in Chinese cabbage. Acta Hortic. Sin. 2015, 42, 697–705. [Google Scholar]
  25. Zhou, Y.; Ma, J.; Xie, J.; Deng, L.; Yao, S.; Zeng, K. Transcriptomic and biochemical analysis of highlighted induction of phenylpropanoid pathway metabolism of citrus fruit in response to salicylic acid, Pichia membranaefaciens and oligochitosan. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 2018, 142, 81–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Siddaiah, C.N.; Prasanth, K.V.H.; Satyanarayana, N.R.; Mudili, V.; Gupta, V.K.; Kalagatur, N.K.; Satyavati, T.; Dai, X.-F.; Chen, J.-Y.; Mocan, A. Chitosan nanoparticles having higher degree of acetylation induce resistance against pearl millet downy mildew through nitric oxide generation. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 2485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Yin, H.; Zhao, X.; Du, Y. Oligochitosan: A plant diseases vaccine—A review. Carbohydr. Polym. 2010, 82, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Beauchamp, C.; Fridovich, I. Superoxide dismutase: Improved assays and an assay applicable to acrylamide gels. Anal. Biochem. 1971, 44, 276–287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Hammerschmidt, R.; Nuckles, E.M.; Kuć, J. Association of enhanced peroxidase activity with induced systemic resistance of cucumber to Colletotrichum lagenarium. Physiol. Plant Pathol. 1982, 20, 73–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Bailly, C.; Leymarie, J.; Lehner, A.; Rousseau, S.; Come, D.; Corbineau, F. Catalase activity and expression in developing sunflower seeds as related to drying. J. Exp. Bot. 2004, 55, 475–483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Beaudoin-Eagan, L.D.; Thorpe, T.A. Tyrosine and phenylalanine ammonia lyase activities during shoot initiation in tobacco callus cultures. Plant Physiol. 1985, 78, 438–441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Ma, J.; Chen, T.; Wu, S.; Yang, C.; Bai, M.; Shu, K.; Li, K.; Zhang, G.; Jin, Z.; He, F. iProX: An integrated proteome resource. Nucleic Acids Res. 2018, 47, 1211–1217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Kato-Noguchi, H.; Ino, T. Concentration and release level of momilactone B in the seedlings of eight rice cultivars. J. Plant Physiol. 2005, 162, 965–969. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Kato-Noguchi, H.; Ino, T.; Sata, N.; Yamamura, S. Isolation and identification of a potent allelopathic substance in rice root exudates. Physiol. Plant. 2002, 115, 401–405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Livak, K.J.; Schmittgen, T.D. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2−ΔΔCT method. Methods 2001, 25, 402–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Vanloon, L.C.; Bakker, P.A.H.M.; Pieterse, C.M.J. Systemic resistance induced by rhizosphere bacteria. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 1998, 36, 453–483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Walters, D.R.; Ratsep, J.; Havis, N.D. Controlling crop diseases using induced resistance: Challenges for the future. J. Exp. Bot. 2013, 64, 1263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Brilli, F.; Loreto, F.; Baccelli, I. Exploiting plant volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in agriculture to improve sustainable defense strategies and productivity of crops. Front. Plant Sci. 2019, 10, 264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Ram, R.M.; Keswani, C.; Bisen, K.; Tripathi, R.; Singh, S.P.; Singh, H.B. Biocontrol technology: Eco-friendly approaches for sustainable agriculture. Omics Technol. Bio-Eng. Acad. 2018, 2, 177–190. [Google Scholar]
  40. Wojtaszek, P. Oxidative burst: An early plant response to pathogen infection. Biochem. J. 1997, 322, 681–692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Bindschedler, L.V.; Dewdney, J.; Blee, K.A.; Stone, J.M.; Asai, T.; Plotnikov, J.; Denoux, C.; Hayes, T.; Gerrish, C.; Davies, D.R. Peroxidase-dependent apoplastic oxidative burst in Arabidopsis required for pathogen resistance. Plant J. 2006, 47, 851–863. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Marjamaa, K.; Kukkola, E.M.; Fagerstedt, K.V. The role of xylem class III peroxidases in lignification. J. Exp. Bot. 2009, 60, 367–376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Turpaev, K. Reactive oxygen species and regulation of gene expression. Biochemistry (Moscow) 2002, 67, 281–292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Solecka, D. Role of phenylpropanoid compounds in plant responses to different stress factors. Acta Physiol. Plant. 1997, 19, 257–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Liu, Y.; Ge, Y.; Bi, Y.; Li, C.; Deng, H.; Hu, L.; Dong, B. Effect of postharvest acibenzolar-S-methyl dipping on phenylpropanoid pathway metabolism in muskmelon (Cucumis melo L.) fruits. Sci. Hortic. 2014, 168, 113–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Panina, Y.S.; Vasyukova, N.I.; Chalenko, G.I.; Ozeretskovskaya, O.L. Changes in Catalase Activity in Potato Tubers, Induced by Immunoregulators. Dokl. Biol. Sci. 2004, 395, 158–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Quirino, B.; Candido, E.; Campos, P.; Franco, O.; Krüger, R. Proteomic approaches to study plant–pathogen interactions. Phytochemistry 2010, 71, 351–362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Kato, T.; Kabuto, C.; Sasaki, N.; Tsunagawa, M.; Aizawa, H.; Fujita, K.; Kato, Y.; Kitahara, Y.; Takahashi, N. Momilactones, growth inhibitors from rice, Oryza sativa L. Tetrahedron Lett. 1973, 14, 3861–3864. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Cartwright, D.W.; Langcake, P.; Pryce, R.J.; Leworthy, D.P.; Ride, J.P. Isolation and characterization of two phytoalexins from rice as momilactones A and B. Phytochemistry 1981, 20, 535–537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Zhao, M.; Cheng, J.; Guo, B.; Duan, J.; Che, C.-T. Momilactone and related diterpenoids as potential agricultural chemicals. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2018, 66, 7859–7872. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Cartwright, D.; Langcake, P.; Pryce, R.J.; Leworthy, D.P.; Ride, J.P. Chemical activation of host defence mechanisms as a basis for crop protection. Nature 1977, 267, 511–513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Nozaki, H.; Hayashi, K.I.; Nishimura, N.; Kawaide, H.; Takaoka, D. Momilactone A and B as allelochemicals from moss Hypnum plumaeforme: First occurrence in Bryophytes. J. Agric. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 2007, 71, 3127–3130. [Google Scholar]
  53. Kato-Noguchi, H.; Kobayashi, K. Jasmonic acid, protein phosphatase inhibitor, metals and UV-irradiation increased momilactone A and B concentrations in the moss Hypnum plumaeforme. J. Plant Physiol. 2009, 166, 1118–1122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Kato-Noguchi, H. Secretion of momilactone A and B by the moss Hypnum plumaeforme. Plant Signal. Behav. 2009, 4, 737–739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  55. Kato-Noguchi, H.; Kobayashi, K.; Shigemori, H. Allelopathy of the moss Hypnum plumaeforme by the production of momilactone A and B. Weed Res. 2010, 49, 621–627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Fukuta, M.; Dang Xuan, T.; Deba, F.; Tawata, S.; Dang Khanh, T.; Min Chung, I. Comparative efficacies in vitro of antibacterial, fungicidal, antioxidant, and herbicidal activities of momilatones A and B. J. Plant Interact. 2007, 2, 245–251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  57. Tsunakawa, M.; Ohba, A.; Sasaki, N.; Kabuto, C.; Kato, T.; Kitahara, Y.; Takahashi, N. Momilactone-C, a minor constituent of growth inhibitors in rice husk. Chem. Lett. 1976, 5, 1157–1158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  58. Na, L.; Wang, S.; Lou, H. A new pimarane-type diterpenoid from moss Pseudoleskeella papillosa (Lindb.) Kindb. Acta Pharm. Sin. B 2012, 2, 256–259. [Google Scholar]
  59. Li, G.; Xu, Q.-L.; He, C.-M.; Zeng, L.; Wang, H.-F. Two new anti-fungal diterpenoids from the husks of Oryza sativa. Phytochem. Lett. 2014, 10, 309–312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Horie, K.; Inoue, Y.; Sakai, M.; Yao, Q.; Tanimoto, Y.; Koga, J.; Toshima, H.; Hasegawa, M. Identification of UV-induced diterpenes including a new diterpene phytoalexin, phytocassane f, from rice leaves by complementary GC/MS and LC/MS approaches. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2015, 63, 4050–4059. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Cho, J.G.; Cha, B.J.; Min, L.S.; Shrestha, S.; Jeong, R.H.; Sung, L.D.; Kim, Y.C.; Lee, D.G.; Kang, H.C.; Kim, J. Diterpenes from the roots of Oryza sativa L. and their inhibition activity on no production in LPS-stimulated RAW264.7 macrophages. Chem. Biodivers. 2015, 12, 1356–1364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Chung, I.; Ateeque, A.; Kim, J. Natural Herbicidal Agent Containing Momilactones A and B Identified in and Isolated from Rice Hulls. U.S. Patent Application No. 20060160701A1, 20 July 2006. [Google Scholar]
Plants 08 00538 g001 550
Figure 1. Effects of fluoro-substituted benzothiadiazole derivatives (FBT) and chitosan oligosaccharide (COS) on disease incidence and disease index caused by F. oxysporum. (A) disease incidence, and (B) disease index. The values were the means of three replicates of three different experiments. Values with different superscript letters were significantly different at p < 0.05.
Figure 1. Effects of fluoro-substituted benzothiadiazole derivatives (FBT) and chitosan oligosaccharide (COS) on disease incidence and disease index caused by F. oxysporum. (A) disease incidence, and (B) disease index. The values were the means of three replicates of three different experiments. Values with different superscript letters were significantly different at p < 0.05.
Plants 08 00538 g001
Plants 08 00538 g002 550
Figure 2. Effects of FBT and COS on growth of root caused by F. oxysporum. (A) root length, (B) root surface area, (C) root volume, and (D) root dry weight. The values were the means of three replicates of three different experiments. Values with different superscript letters were significantly different at p < 0.05.
Figure 2. Effects of FBT and COS on growth of root caused by F. oxysporum. (A) root length, (B) root surface area, (C) root volume, and (D) root dry weight. The values were the means of three replicates of three different experiments. Values with different superscript letters were significantly different at p < 0.05.
Plants 08 00538 g002
Plants 08 00538 g003 550
Figure 3. Effects of FBT and COS on activities of superoxide dismutase (SOD) (A), peroxidase (POD) (B), catalase (CAT) (C), and phenylalanine ammonia lyase (PAL) (D) in root. Data are expressed as the mean of triplicate assays. The values were the means of three replicates of three different experiments.
Figure 3. Effects of FBT and COS on activities of superoxide dismutase (SOD) (A), peroxidase (POD) (B), catalase (CAT) (C), and phenylalanine ammonia lyase (PAL) (D) in root. Data are expressed as the mean of triplicate assays. The values were the means of three replicates of three different experiments.
Plants 08 00538 g003
Plants 08 00538 g004 550
Figure 4. Heatmap showing Pearson correlation coefficients from all quantified proteins between each pair of samples.
Figure 4. Heatmap showing Pearson correlation coefficients from all quantified proteins between each pair of samples.
Plants 08 00538 g004
Plants 08 00538 g005 550
Figure 5. Volcano plots of Differentially Expressed Proteins (DEPs) in FBT-(A) and COS-(B) treated roots. DEPs were selected by adjusted p-value < 0.05. The x-axis shows the fold change in protein expression, and the y-axis shows the statistical significance of the differences. Grey dots indicate proteins without significantly differential expression; red dots denote significantly up-regulated proteins in FBT and COS-treated roots compared to the control root; and blue dots mean significantly down-regulated proteins in FBT and COS-treated roots compared to the control root.
Figure 5. Volcano plots of Differentially Expressed Proteins (DEPs) in FBT-(A) and COS-(B) treated roots. DEPs were selected by adjusted p-value < 0.05. The x-axis shows the fold change in protein expression, and the y-axis shows the statistical significance of the differences. Grey dots indicate proteins without significantly differential expression; red dots denote significantly up-regulated proteins in FBT and COS-treated roots compared to the control root; and blue dots mean significantly down-regulated proteins in FBT and COS-treated roots compared to the control root.
Plants 08 00538 g005
Plants 08 00538 g006 550
Figure 6. Bubble plot of KEGG pathway enrichment for DEPs in FBT-(A) and COS-(B) treated roots. The rich factor is calculated as the DEP number divided by the base number of any given pathway. Dot size denotes the number of proteins and dot color denotes the range of –log10 p value, and a lower –log10 p value indicates greater pathway enrichment.
Figure 6. Bubble plot of KEGG pathway enrichment for DEPs in FBT-(A) and COS-(B) treated roots. The rich factor is calculated as the DEP number divided by the base number of any given pathway. Dot size denotes the number of proteins and dot color denotes the range of –log10 p value, and a lower –log10 p value indicates greater pathway enrichment.
Plants 08 00538 g006
Plants 08 00538 g007 550
Figure 7. Illustration of KEGG pathway of diterpenoid biosynthesis in COS-(A) and FBT-(B) treated roots. Red signifies up-regulated proteins in FBT and oligochitosan-treated roots compared to control root.
Figure 7. Illustration of KEGG pathway of diterpenoid biosynthesis in COS-(A) and FBT-(B) treated roots. Red signifies up-regulated proteins in FBT and oligochitosan-treated roots compared to control root.
Plants 08 00538 g007
Plants 08 00538 g008 550
Figure 8. Concentrations of momilactone in rice root. The values were the means of three replicates of three independent experiments. Values with different superscript letters were significantly different at p < 0.05.
Figure 8. Concentrations of momilactone in rice root. The values were the means of three replicates of three independent experiments. Values with different superscript letters were significantly different at p < 0.05.
Plants 08 00538 g008
Plants 08 00538 g009 550
Figure 9. Verification of the proteomic results by qRT-PCR. White bar: proteomic data for the proteins. Black bar: qRT-PCR results for the proteins. The values were the means of three replicates of three different experiments. (A) ent-copalyl diphosphate synthases, (B) ent-cassa-12,15-diene synthase, (C) ent-kaurene oxidase, (D) ent-cassa-12,15-diene 11-hydroxylases, (E) sandaracopimaradiene/labdatriene synthase, (F) syn-copalyl-diphosphate synthase, (G) 9-beta-pimara-7,15-diene oxidase, and (H) momilactone-A synthase.
Figure 9. Verification of the proteomic results by qRT-PCR. White bar: proteomic data for the proteins. Black bar: qRT-PCR results for the proteins. The values were the means of three replicates of three different experiments. (A) ent-copalyl diphosphate synthases, (B) ent-cassa-12,15-diene synthase, (C) ent-kaurene oxidase, (D) ent-cassa-12,15-diene 11-hydroxylases, (E) sandaracopimaradiene/labdatriene synthase, (F) syn-copalyl-diphosphate synthase, (G) 9-beta-pimara-7,15-diene oxidase, and (H) momilactone-A synthase.
Plants 08 00538 g009

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ma, B.; Wang, J.; Liu, C.; Hu, J.; Tan, K.; Zhao, F.; Yuan, M.; Zhang, J.; Gai, Z. Preventive Effects of Fluoro-Substituted Benzothiadiazole Derivatives and Chitosan Oligosaccharide against the Rice Seedling Blight Induced by Fusarium oxysporum. Plants 2019, 8, 538. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants8120538

AMA Style

Ma B, Wang J, Liu C, Hu J, Tan K, Zhao F, Yuan M, Zhang J, Gai Z. Preventive Effects of Fluoro-Substituted Benzothiadiazole Derivatives and Chitosan Oligosaccharide against the Rice Seedling Blight Induced by Fusarium oxysporum. Plants. 2019; 8(12):538. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants8120538

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ma, Bo, Junhe Wang, Chuanzeng Liu, Jifang Hu, Kefei Tan, Fuyang Zhao, Ming Yuan, Junhua Zhang, and Zhijia Gai. 2019. "Preventive Effects of Fluoro-Substituted Benzothiadiazole Derivatives and Chitosan Oligosaccharide against the Rice Seedling Blight Induced by Fusarium oxysporum" Plants 8, no. 12: 538. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants8120538

APA Style

Ma, B., Wang, J., Liu, C., Hu, J., Tan, K., Zhao, F., Yuan, M., Zhang, J., & Gai, Z. (2019). Preventive Effects of Fluoro-Substituted Benzothiadiazole Derivatives and Chitosan Oligosaccharide against the Rice Seedling Blight Induced by Fusarium oxysporum. Plants, 8(12), 538. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants8120538

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop