Next Article in Journal
Physicochemical and Functional Evaluation of Chia Mucilage (Salvia hispanica)–Alginate Microcapsules as a Delivery System of ACE-Inhibitory Peptides from Phaseolus lunatus
Previous Article in Journal
Ecosystem Multifunctionality in Semi-Arid Wetlands Is Jointly Driven by Soil Environmental Factors and Microorganisms
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Plants
Volume 15
Issue 5
10.3390/plants15050703
plants-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Kinship Modulates Carbon Allocation and Phosphorus Acquisition in Chinese Fir–AMF Networks Under Neighbor P Limitation

by
Zihao Zhao
1,2,3,
Hongjian Wei
1,2,3,
Hui Hu
1,2,3,
Yuxin Yao
1,2,3,
Jing Liang
1,2,3 and
Pengfei Wu
1,2,3,*
1
College of Forestry, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou 350002, China
2
Chinese Fir Engineering Technology Research Center of the State Forestry and Grassland Administration, Fuzhou 350002, China
3
Fujian Provincial Colleges and University Engineering Research Center of Plantation Sustainable Management, Fuzhou 350002, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Plants 2026, 15(5), 703; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants15050703
Submission received: 2 February 2026 / Revised: 23 February 2026 / Accepted: 24 February 2026 / Published: 26 February 2026
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Physiological and Biochemical Responses of Plants to Environmental Changes)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

Phosphorus (P) deficiency in forest soils is a key constraint on the sustainable management and productivity of Chinese fir (Cunninghamia lanceolata) plantations. This study investigated how P limitation alters the reciprocal exchange of “photosynthetic carbon and mineral phosphorus” between Chinese fir and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) when the focal plant grows adjacent to neighbors with different degrees of relatedness. An indoor pot experiment simulating heterogeneous P supply was conducted using clonal seedlings of Chinese fir No. 36 as the focal plant, with Chinese fir No. 36, Chinese fir No. 41, and Schima superba as neighboring plants to establish three two-plant combinations: a kin pair (No. 36 + No. 36), a close-kin pair (No. 36 + No. 41), and an unrelated-kin pair (No. 36 + S. superba). Funneliformis mosseae was inoculated into the shared root-zone room connecting the two plants, and the neighbor was subjected to a gradient of P limitation (sufficient P, low P, and zero P). Meanwhile, the focal No. 36 plant received 13CO2 pulse labeling to form a “Chinese fir–AMF–P-limited neighbor” symbiotic network in which No. 36 served as the 13C donor. AMF colonization, seedling growth, and changes in 13C enrichment and P concentration in plant tissues of the focal plant were quantified. Neighbor P limitation significantly increased AMF colonization in roots and whole-plant P concentration of the focal Chinese fir. Following 13CO2 pulse labeling, whole-plant 13C enrichment of the focal plant increased significantly under the neighbor zero P treatment, suggesting enhanced carbon allocation under severe neighbor P limitation. Moreover, under the neighbor zero P treatment, focal plants grown with an unrelated-kin neighbor showed significant increases in stem P concentration (1.86 g·kg−1) and stem atom% 13C (1.50%), whereas focal plants grown with a kin neighbor exhibited a significant increase in root Atom% 13C (1.29%). These patterns indicate that neighbor relatedness may modulate carbon allocation and P acquisition within the mycorrhizal network: in the kin context, the focal plant tended to allocate more photosynthetic carbon belowground and may partially subsidize the AMF carbon demand (i.e., a higher C reward), coinciding with a relatively weaker P accumulation in its own tissues; in contrast, in the unrelated kin context, carbon allocation shifted toward stems and was associated with strengthened P accumulation in stem tissues. Overall, the results highlight the dynamic nature of AMF-mediated carbon–nutrient reciprocity across hosts of contrasting relatedness and provide new insights into how mycorrhizal networks may facilitate plant adaptation to nutrient limitation.

1. Introduction

Phosphorus (P) is an essential nutrient for plant growth and development and plays pivotal roles in multiple metabolic processes and the biosynthesis of key cellular constituents [1]. Although soils generally contain substantial amounts of total P, most P occurs in organic forms or as mineral-bound salts, which are characterized by low mobility and strong spatial heterogeneity. Consequently, the pool of plant-available P is often limited [2], and soil P deficiency constrains more than 30% of global agricultural and forestry production [3]. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) are among the most widespread and intimate soil fungal symbionts of plants and are central to plant nutrient acquisition [4]. After symbiosis is established, AMF develop extraradical hyphae that extend beyond the root depletion zone, thereby enlarging the effective soil volume explored for P and transporting absorbed P to cortical cells in the host root, which helps alleviate P limitation [5]. In return, the host allocates photosynthetically derived carbohydrates and lipids to the extraradical hyphae as a “C reward”, providing energy and substrates for AMF growth, hyphal development, and reproduction, thereby forming a reciprocal exchange based on photosynthetic C and mineral nutrients [6].
In natural ecosystems, arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) often colonize multiple host plants simultaneously. Through hyphal interconnections and anastomosis, AMF form structurally complex arbuscular mycorrhizal networks (AMNs) [7], which function as important pathways for resource exchange and regulation in soils. These networks can facilitate the transfer and redistribution of limited pools of readily available P and, to some extent, carbon (C) sources within the network, thereby extending plant–fungus interactions from a single plant “root–fungus” association to functional coupling among multiple plants and enhancing tolerance to P limitation [8,9]. However, under P deficiency, plant growth and metabolism are frequently suppressed, which can reduce photosynthesis and consequently decrease the fixation of photosynthetic C; accordingly, the C supply available to AMF from host plants also declines [10,11]. Given that a primary ecological payoff of AMF symbiosis is the acquisition of sufficient photosynthates from hosts to support spore production and hyphal development [12], an unresolved question is whether AMF alter the efficiency and/or allocation of nutrient transfer through hyphae among different hosts when the “C reward” provided by hosts is highly asymmetric under nutrient-stressed conditions.
Some scholars propose that, within natural plant communities, larger individuals or healthier plants possess greater effective photosynthetic surface area, and AMF therefore preferentially allocate mineral nutrients through arbuscular mycorrhizal networks (AMNs) to hosts that can offer more photosynthetic C in exchange, thereby securing a higher “C reward” [13,14]. In a Medicago truncatula system, Fellbaum et al. [15] observed that AMF consistently allocated a higher proportion of P to unrelated shaded hosts with stronger photosynthetic capacity, whereas shaded hosts with constrained photosynthesis were more likely to become disadvantaged recipients of mineral nutrients within AMNs. In contrast, other studies suggest that AMF can enhance community-level nutrient use efficiency and promote plant diversity by supplying mineral nutrients to competitively weaker individuals [16,17]. For example, Walder et al. [18] reported that a weakly competitive flax (Linum usitatissimum) contributed very little carbon to AMF yet received substantial supplementation of P, N, and other nutrients, resulting in a marked growth benefit. Collectively, these findings indicate that AMF resource allocation is rarely static or evenly distributed; rather, it can be dynamically regulated by host C-supply capacity, the intensity of nutrient demand, and external environmental constraints, thereby reshaping the “carbon–mineral nutrient” trade within AMNs and ultimately altering competitive interactions among plants [19,20]. Therefore, elucidating how P limitation modulates the reciprocal exchange of “photosynthetic C and mineral nutrients” among different hosts is critical for maintaining the stability of plant communities.
An issue that warrants further investigation is that neighboring plants within a community may not only recognize kin via specific leaf volatiles, photoreceptor-mediated cues, and root exudates, but also establish kin-recognition networks through soil microorganisms such as AMF and rhizobia, thereby mitigating resource competition between neighbors [21]. Close to animals, plants can exhibit kin recognition and kin-biased responses during growth and development: individuals assess the relatedness of surrounding plants and adjust their competitive strategies accordingly [22]. For instance, Cakile edentula markedly suppresses root growth when growing adjacent to closely related neighbors [23]. In Pseudotsuga menziesii and other species, encounters with kin neighbors have been associated with increased AM colonization accompanied by reduced investment in root growth, which may help avoid overexploitation of shared belowground resources and relieve intraspecific competitive pressure [24,25]. Booth et al. [26] further demonstrated that AMF can transport carbon acquired from adult trees through AMNs to related individuals, thereby reducing intraspecific competition and enhancing population stability. Together, these observations suggest that plant roots can deploy kin-dependent competitive strategies, and that cooperation among closely related individuals may increase inclusive fitness, benefiting both individuals and populations—an advantage that can be critical for maintaining competitiveness under changing environments [27]. Accordingly, some plants may initiate kin-recognition behaviors to avoid maladaptive escalation of competition, and such recognition may be particularly pronounced among genotypes with high relatedness. Therefore, examining how kin recognition modulates the provision of “C reward” from plants to AMF offers a new perspective for mechanistic studies on the reciprocal exchange of “photosynthetic C and mineral nutrients” between AMF and plants.
Chinese fir (Cunninghamia lanceolata) is the most important timber and plantation tree species in subtropical southern China. It is distributed across 17 provinces and administrative regions, with a plantation area of approximately 9.902 million ha [28]. As a lineage proposed to have originated in the Late Jurassic of the Mesozoic [29], Chinese fir has likely undergone long-term coevolution with AMF, and extensive belowground mycorrhizal hyphal networks may occur in the interlaced root zone, facilitating mutual dependence among neighboring individuals [30]. Previous studies have shown pronounced differences among Chinese fir clonal plantations derived from distinct geographic provenances in their capacity and efficiency to recruit AMF in soil [31]. Moreover, P limitation can induce Chinese fir roots to release L-arginine and volatile organic compounds (VOCs) such as n-decane, which may strengthen kin-recognition capacity [32,33]. Collectively, these characteristics make Chinese fir a suitable system to investigate AMF-mediated kin recognition among neighboring plants.
Thus, in this study, we constructed a “focal Chinese fir–AMF–P-limited neighbor” symbiotic network system with varying genetic relatedness. Combined with 13CO2 pulse labeling of the focal Chinese fir, we quantified AMF colonization, seedling growth, and the dynamics of 13C enrichment and P concentration in tissues of the focal Chinese fir to test the following hypotheses: (1) Chinese fir copes with the P-limited environment of neighboring plants by regulating its mutualistic relationship with AMF. (2) Kin recognition regulates the strategies employed by Chinese fir in response to phosphorus limitation in neighboring plants.

2. Results

2.1. Effects of Neighboring Plant P Limitation on AMF Colonization Rate in Chinese Fir Roots

Funneliformis mosseae formed mycorrhizae with the roots of Chinese fir, and typical mycorrhizal structures were developed inside the roots (Figure 1). Across the three relatedness combinations (Kin, Close, and Unrelated), AMF colonization in roots of the focal Chinese fir was significantly higher under the neighbor zero P treatment (P1–P0) than under the neighbor P-supplied treatments (P1–P0.5 and P1–P1) (p < 0.05) (Figure 2a).

2.2. Effects of Neighboring Plant P Limitation on the Growth of Chinese Fir

In the Unrelated combination, the whole-plant biomass increment of the focal Chinese fir under neighbor low P (P1–P0.5) was significantly higher than that under neighbor P sufficiency (P1–P1) (p < 0.05). In the Kin and Close combinations, whole-plant biomass increment did not differ significantly among neighbor P treatments (p > 0.05) (Figure 2b). In the Unrelated combination, the root-to-shoot ratio of the focal Chinese fir under neighbor zero P (P1–P0) was significantly reduced by 29.56% relative to P1–P1 (LSD; p < 0.05), whereas no significant difference was observed between P1–P0 and P1–P0.5 (p > 0.05). No significant effects of neighbor P supply on the root-to-shoot ratio were detected in the Kin or Close combinations (p > 0.05) (Figure 2c).

2.3. Effects of Neighboring Plant P Limitation on 13C Abundance in Different Organs of Chinese Fir

The responses of 13C abundance (atom% 13C) in the whole plant and individual organs of the focal Chinese fir differed among neighbor P treatments and relatedness combinations. At the whole-plant level, across the Kin, Close, and Unrelated combinations, whole-plant atom% 13C under the neighbor zero P treatment (P1–P0) was significantly higher than that under either neighbor P sufficiency (P1–P1) or neighbor low P (P1–P0.5) (p < 0.05) (Figure 2d). At the root level, a significant effect was detected only in the Kin combination, where root atom% 13C under P1–P0 was higher than that under P1–P0.5 and P1–P1 (p < 0.05) (Figure 2e). At the stem level, stem atom% 13C in the Close combination under P1–P0 was 5.50% higher than P1–P1 (p < 0.05); in the Unrelated combination, P1–P0 was significantly higher than P1–P0.5 and P1–P1 (p < 0.05) (Figure 2f). At the leaf level, leaf atom% 13C in the Kin combination was 8.55% higher under P1–P0 than under P1–P1 (p < 0.05); in the Close combination, P1–P0 was significantly higher than P1–P0.5 (p < 0.05) (Figure 2g).

2.4. Effects of Neighboring Plant P Limitation on P Content in Different Organs of Chinese Fir

Total P concentration (g·kg−1) in the whole plant and individual organs of the focal Chinese fir responded to neighbor P treatments in a relatedness-dependent manner. At the whole-plant level (Figure 2h), whole-plant total P was significantly higher under neighbor zero P (P1–P0) than under P1–P1 in the Kin combination (p < 0.05); in the Close combination, P1–P0.5 was significantly higher than P1–P1 (p < 0.05); and in the Unrelated combination, P1–P0 was significantly higher than both P1–P0.5 and P1–P1 (p < 0.05). At the root level (Figure 2i), a significant difference was detected only in the Close combination, where P1–P0 was 56.09% higher than P1–P1 (p < 0.05). At the stem level (Figure 2j), P1–P0 was significantly higher than P1–P0.5 and P1–P1 in the Unrelated combination (p < 0.05). At the leaf level (Figure 2k), leaf total P in the Unrelated combination was 34.16% higher under P1–P0 than under P1–P1 (p < 0.05). The interaction between Phosphorus Supply and Neighbor relatedness (A × B) had a highly significant effect on whole-plant and stem phosphorus contents (p < 0.01) (Table 1).

2.5. Linear Regression Between Whole-Plant 13C Abundance and Whole-Plant P Content of Chinese Fir Under Neighboring Plant P Limitation

As shown in Figure 3a–i, under P1–P0, a significant positive correlation between whole-plant atom% ^13C and whole-plant total P was detected only in the Unrelated combination (y = 2.8188x − 2.6549, R2 = 0.87, p < 0.05) (Figure 3c), whereas the correlations were not significant in the Kin or Close combinations (Figure 3a,b). Under P1–P0.5 and P1–P1, no significant correlations were observed in any relatedness combination (p > 0.05) (Figure 3d–i).

2.6. Correlation Analysis of Various Indicators of Chinese Fir

AMF colonization rate was positively correlated with W13C (r = 0.42, p < 0.05), and also showed significant positive correlations with L13C (r = 0.43) and GD (r = 0.31), but a significant negative correlation with WB (r = −0.31, p < 0.05). AMF colonization was also positively correlated with Pn (r = 0.40) and WP (r = 0.29) (p < 0.05) (Figure 4).

3. Discussion

3.1. Study on the Response Mechanism of Chinese Fir to Neighboring Plant P Limitation

This study showed that P limitation imposed on neighboring plants significantly increased AMF colonization in the roots of the focal Chinese fir (Figure 2a) and was accompanied by a higher whole-plant P content (Figure 2h) (p < 0.05). As a major group of soil symbionts intimately associated with plants, AMF can transmit stress-related cues through hyphal networks and induce adaptive responses in adjacent, connected plants when a host experiences environmental stress [34,35,36]. In the present system, AMF colonization was detected in both the focal Chinese fir (Figure 2a) and neighboring plants with contrasting relatedness (Figure A2a). After 13CO2 pulse labeling of the focal plant, the 13C abundance detected in neighboring plants exceeded their respective natural-abundance baselines (Table A1), a pattern that is consistent with carbon movement within a common mycorrhizal network and thus supports the potential mediating role of AMF in interplant carbon exchange. Similar AMN-enabled interplant communication has been experimentally demonstrated in AMF-connected tomato plants, providing a relevant precedent for network-level signal and resource coupling [37].
Correlation analysis further indicated a significant positive relationship between AMF colonization in Chinese fir roots and whole-plant P content (Figure 4). Tian et al. [38] reported that Chinese fir can cope with low P stress by increasing AMF colonization, enhancing antioxidant enzyme activities, strengthening photosynthesis, and modulating endogenous hormone distribution. In addition, Liu et al. [39] showed that once stress signals were conveyed through arbuscular mycorrhizal networks, the connected “healthy” plant increased AMF colonization and consequently improved stress tolerance. Together with these observations, the present results support an interpretation that AMF may function as a signal carrier of P-limitation cues, triggering an adaptive increase in AMF establishment in the focal plant and thereby strengthening the mycorrhizal P-acquisition pathway under elevated P-limitation risk. Mechanistically, experimental manipulation of host carbon supply in mycorrhizal root organ cultures demonstrated that carbon availability delivered across the mycorrhizal interface can directly trigger fungal nutrient uptake and long-distance transport (shown for N) and is coordinated by shifts in fungal gene expression [40], supporting the view that host carbon flux is a proximal regulator of fungal nutrient delivery and “terms of trade” in AM symbioses.
In parallel, neighbor P limitation was associated with higher whole-plant 13C enrichment of the focal Chinese fir, particularly under the P1–P0 condition (Figure 2d), and AMF colonization was positively correlated with whole-plant 13C enrichment (Figure 4). Although gas-exchange traits (Figure A1a–d) may vary among combinations, the concurrent increase in 13C enrichment and colonization supports a carbon–nutrient exchange framework. Photosynthetically fixed carbon is not only the fundamental substrate for plant growth but also the primary currency sustaining the reciprocal trade of “photosynthetic carbon and mineral nutrients” between AMF and host plants [41]. Under stress, increased mineral nutrient transfer from AMF to hosts is often coupled with increased carbon acquisition by AMF to maintain fungal metabolism and symbiotic stability [42]. In line with the “biological market” concept, plants can reward more cooperative fungal partners with more carbon, stabilizing reciprocal exchange [43]. Consistently, Hong et al. [44] demonstrated, using 13CO2 labeling, that under low P conditions, AMF increased the proportion of host carbon allocated to colonized roots and fungal hyphae, thereby promoting fungal growth and helping hosts cope with P limitation. Therefore, it is proposed that when neighboring plants experience P limitation, Chinese fir may increase carbon assimilation and/or allocate more photosynthate to AMF as a higher “C reward”, which could promote P return through the mycorrhizal pathway and mitigate potential P-limitation risk.

3.2. Study on the Regulation of Kin Recognition on the Response Strategy of Chinese Fir to Neighboring Plant P Limitation

Kin recognition is widely considered an important regulator of intra- and interspecific competitive intensity and can ultimately shape plant growth strategies and resource allocation [45]. In the present study, response patterns of the focal Chinese fir differed among the three neighbor-relatedness combinations under neighbor P limitation. Specifically, under the neighbor zero P treatment, a significant increase in root 13C enrichment was detected only when the focal plant grew adjacent to a kin neighbor (Figure 2e), whereas plants grown with an unrelated neighbor exhibited significant increases in stem 13C enrichment (Figure 2f) and stem P concentration (Figure 2j). These organ-specific shifts are consistent with the notion that plants can adjust competitive investment depending on the perceived “self–non-self” context, thereby reducing wasteful intraspecific competition while enhancing performance when facing unrelated-kin competitors [46,47]. Moreover, accumulating evidence suggests that AMF and their hyphal networks can participate in kin-related interactions by transmitting cues and/or mediating resource exchange, potentially providing measurable benefits under certain neighbor contexts [27].
Consistent with this view, growth and allocation traits of the focal Chinese fir responded most clearly in the unrelated combination. Under the neighbor low P treatment, whole-plant biomass increment was significantly higher than that under neighbor P sufficiency (Figure 2b), while under the neighbor zero P treatment, the root-to-shoot ratio was significantly reduced relative to neighbor P sufficiency (Figure 2c). In contrast, neither biomass increment nor root-to-shoot ratio differed significantly among neighbor P levels in the kin and close-kin combinations (Figure 2b,c). One plausible interpretation is that, when an unrelated neighbor experiences P limitation, the focal Chinese fir may prioritize aboveground investment to maintain competitive advantage, a pattern that is conceptually compatible with competition-induced allocation shifts (e.g., shade-avoidance–type responses) mediated by neighbor cues [48].
In addition, the relationship between whole-plant 13C enrichment and whole-plant P concentration depended on neighbor relatedness under P limitation (Figure 3). In the unrelated combination, the positive association between 13C enrichment and P concentration became stronger under neighbor zero P and reached significance (Figure 3; p < 0.05), whereas in the kin combination, the fitted relationship under neighbor zero P shifted toward a negative trend and did not show a significant correlation. Although correlation patterns alone cannot establish directionality, these contrasting slopes are consistent with a relatedness-dependent “trade configuration” within the Chinese fir–AMF network. In particular, when facing an unrelated P-limited neighbor, increased C input (reflected by higher 13C enrichment) appears to coincide with greater P accumulation in the focal plant, suggesting a more self-benefiting exchange outcome. By contrast, when the neighbor is kin, increased C input by the focal plant does not translate into higher P accumulation in its own tissues, which is compatible with the possibility that network-level resource redistribution favors kin-associated sinks. This interpretation aligns with prior findings that plant kin context can enhance investment in the mycorrhizal network and modify the realized benefits of network association [49].
To further evaluate whether kin neighbors under zero P (P0) conditions could receive network-level support, P concentration and photosynthetic performance were measured in neighboring plants. Under the P0 treatment, the kin neighbor showed a significant increase in whole-plant P concentration (Figure A2b; p < 0.05) but a significant decrease in net photosynthetic rate (Figure A2c; p < 0.05). In a strict one-to-one exchange framework, reduced host carbon supply is often expected to weaken mycorrhiza-mediated nutrient delivery [50,51]. However, in multi-host networks, AMF resource allocation may be constrained more strongly by the net carbon economy of the network, and fungi may compensate for carbon deficits of stressed hosts by acquiring additional C reward from adjacent healthier hosts, thereby maintaining nutrient delivery to the stressed end [52,53]. In addition, previous studies have shown that when biotic stress markedly reduces or nearly interrupts host carbon supply to AMF, nutrient delivery to the stressed host can still be maintained if neighboring healthy plants subsidize the fungal partner with carbon [54]. A possible explanation, consistent with the studies mentioned above, may be that under P limitation, AMF-mediated P delivery to kin neighbors could be maintained even when the neighbors’ photosynthetic capacity declines. This may be because nutrient allocation in multi-host networks can be constrained by network-level carbon balance. Based on the 13C enrichment patterns observed in the focal plants, we suggest that P-sufficient focal Chinese fir might provide a relatively higher C reward to AMF and thereby potentially partially subsidize the carbon deficit of the P-limited kin neighbor. This mechanism could help sustain network functioning, but it still needs to be verified by quantifying carbon transfer and nutrient fluxes within mycorrhizal networks. Future studies incorporating 13C measurements from neighbor tissues and/or AMF-related parameters would further strengthen the evidence for carbon movement at the network level. Collectively, these findings suggest that neighbor relatedness can act as an important factor that reconfigures common mycorrhizal network-mediated carbon–phosphorus exchange under heterogeneous P supply. Future work integrating multi-omics approaches is warranted to identify the key genes and signaling molecules underpinning kin recognition, AMF signal transmission, and carbon–phosphorus allocation, and to clarify the associated regulatory pathways.
Despite the clear treatment-dependent patterns observed in this controlled system, the present study provides initial evidence that AMF-mediated networks are involved in Chinese fir responses to neighbor P limitation and that kin recognition may modulate this response, several constraints inherent to enclosed 13CO2 pulse labeling should be acknowledged. To prevent label leakage and cross-contamination among Rooms during targeted 13CO2 labeling (Figure 5), the experiment could not be fully randomized across multiple independent Rooms. Therefore, although biological replication was implemented at the pot (apparatus) level (n = 5), Room-specific heterogeneity (e.g., microclimate, airflow, and gas mixing) may partially confound treatment effects. In this context, while pot-level replication supports comparisons among treatments, future studies incorporating independent Room replication and stronger Room-level randomization would help further rule out potential Room-related confounding.

4. Materials and Methods

An indoor pot experiment simulating heterogeneous P supply was conducted to examine how P limitation alters the reciprocal exchange of “photosynthetic carbon and mineral phosphorus” between Chinese fir and AMF when a focal plant grows adjacent to neighbors with different degrees of relatedness. Clonal seedlings of Chinese fir No. 36 were used as the focal plant, and Chinese fir No. 36, Chinese fir No. 41, and Schima superba were used as neighboring plants. Three two-plant combinations were established to represent contrasting relatedness: a kin pair (No. 36 + No. 36), a close-kin pair (No. 36 + No. 41), and an unrelated-kin pair (No. 36 + S. superba). A shared root-zone (common Room) was inoculated with Funneliformis mosseae to establish a mycorrhizal network connecting the two plants. The neighboring plant was subjected to a gradient of P limitation (sufficient P, low P, and zero P), whereas the focal No. 36 plant received 13CO2 pulse labeling to generate a symbiotic network in which No. 36 served as the 13C donor within a “Chinese fir–AMF–P-limited neighbor” system.

4.1. Experimental Materials

One-year-old clonal seedlings of Chinese fir No. 36 and No. 41, originating from distinct geographic–ecological types within the core production region and previously selected by the Chinese Fir Engineering Technology Research Center of the National Forestry and Grassland Administration of China, were used as experimental materials. In addition, one-year-old seedlings of Schima superba (a common native broadleaf tree species in subtropical China) were also included, as this species is often used for interplanting under Chinese fir forests in practice, which is consistent with the actual planting pattern of subtropical Chinese fir plantations. The No. 36 and No. 41 clones differ substantially in P-foraging strategies under P limitation: No. 41 adopts an “active” strategy for adaptation to low P conditions, whereas No. 36 has the capacity to initiate a “passive” strategy, and the relatedness between the two clones is close kin [55]. All seedlings were healthy, free of pests and diseases, uniform in size, and well developed. Initial seedling height and ground diameter were expressed as the mean ± standard error (Table 2). Washed river sand (total P concentration: 0.09 ± 0.01 mg kg−1, by the molybdenum–antimony anti-spectrophotometric method) was used as the potting substrate. Prior to planting, the sand was packed into sterilization bags made of high-density polyethylene film (Beijing Xinminghong Plastic Co., Ltd., Beijing, China) and autoclaved using a vertical steam sterilizer (Shanghai Shen’an Medical Instrument Factory, Shanghai, China) at 121 °C (0.1–0.2 MPa) for 30 min. The AMF inoculum (Funneliformis mosseae) was provided by the Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi Germplasm Resource Bank, Institute of Plant Nutrition and Resources, Beijing Academy of Agriculture and Forestry Sciences (Beijing, China). The inoculum was propagated using Sorghum bicolor as a host plant; after 3 months of pot culture, the inoculum was harvested, including the entire substrate, colonized root fragments, spores, and hyphae, and stored at 4 °C until use.

4.2. Experimental Design

4.2.1. Pot Experiment

The experiment followed a two-factor completely randomized factorial design. The first factor was neighbor type, including same clone No. 36–No. 36 (kin), different clones within the same species No. 36–No. 41 (close), and a heterospecific neighbor No. 36–Schima superba (unrelated), and the second factor was the P-supply gradient for the neighbor, including 1.0 mmol·L−1 KH2PO4 (P1), 0.5 mmol·L−1 KH2PO4 (P0.5), and 0 mmol·L−1 KH2PO4 (P0). Thus, there were 9 treatments (three neighbor types × three P gradients in room III). Each treatment had 5 independent replicates, resulting in 45 independent experiment units in total. We used self-designed “Chinese fir–AMF–P-limited neighbor” pot apparatuses (i.e., experiment units; Figure 5) to conduct the pot-based simulation experiment.
The apparatus comprised three rooms (I, II, and III) separated by 25-μm nylon meshes (China, 600 mesh, single layer), which allow hyphal passage but prevent root penetration, thereby avoiding direct root contact between plants in adjacent rooms [56]. No root penetration across the meshes was observed during the experiment by periodic inspection. One target Chinese fir seedling (No. 36) was planted in room I, and the neighbor plant (Chinese fir No. 36, Chinese fir No. 41, or S. superba) was planted in room III. Room II was used for AMF inoculation: 200 g of AMF inoculum was thoroughly mixed with the potting substrate in this room (washed and sterilized river sand) to inoculate Funneliformis mosseae, establish mycorrhizal symbiosis, and enable hyphal connections extending across the mesh. Based on the P status of subtropical forest soils in China [57], rooms I and II of all apparatuses received sufficient P supply (1.0 mmol·L−1 KH2PO4, P1), whereas room III received three P treatments (P1, P0.5, and P0), thereby generating three neighbor-P gradients (P1–P1), (P1–P0.5), and (P1–P0) (rooms I/II–room III) and forming a “Chinese fir–AMF–P-limited neighbor” symbiotic network system. In the low P and zero P treatments, K+ was balanced with KCl, and all other nutrients were supplied using a modified quarter-strength incomplete Hoagland solution following Wu et al. [58]. During the treatment period, nutrient solutions corresponding to the target P levels were added separately to each room every 7 d (Figure 5). Prior to planting, the apparatuses were disinfected with 0.1 g·L−1 KMnO4 for 20 min, rinsed with sterile water, and air-dried.
Seedling roots were surface-sterilized with 0.05% NaClO for 15 s and then rinsed five times with sterile water before transplanting into the apparatus. All seedlings were planted in February 2024 and allowed to acclimate for 1 month before treatments began, and the treatment period lasted for 6 months with destructive harvest of all seedlings conducted in September 2024; roots, stems, and leaves were collected separately for subsequent analysis.

4.2.2. 13C Isotope Pulse-Labeling Design

Based on the pot experiment described above (Figure 5), with a 13CO2 pulse-labeling assay in a greenhouse (temperature 26–30 °C, relative humidity ~75%, and a 14 h·d−1 photoperiod). The 13CO2 pulse labeling was conducted in room I, where the focal Chinese fir clone No. 36 was grown. Pulse labeling started 40 days before harvest and was performed once every 10 days for a total of four pulses. Each pulse was applied between 09:00 and 12:00. Following Li et al. [59], a beaker was placed in the labeling room and 0.10 g Na213CO3 (99 atom% 13C; ICON, St. Charles, MO, USA; Shanghai Saifei Biotechnology Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China) was reacted with 2.0 mol·L−1 HCl to generate 13CO2. The released 13CO2 was assimilated by the focal plant via photosynthesis, thereby labeling newly fixed carbon. To prevent excessive temperature increases inside the labeling room during the reaction, ice packs were added as needed until the Na213CO3 reaction was complete. To avoid 13C contamination of unlabeled seedlings, labeled and control treatments were spaced at least 15 m apart.

4.3. Experimental Methods

4.3.1. Determination of AMF Root Colonization Intensity

After destructive harvest, newly formed roots were randomly sampled from each seedling and cut into 30–50 root segments (1 cm in length). Root segments were fixed in FAA solution for 5 h, rinsed with distilled water, and stained using the trypan blue method [60]. The colonization level of each individual root segment was recorded, and AMF root colonization (%) for each seedling was calculated according to the following equation:
AMF root colonization (%) = (∑ M × n)/N
where M is the colonization class (colonization percentage) of an individual root segment, n is the number of root segments with the same colonization class, and N is the total number of root segments assessed per seedling.

4.3.2. Determination of 13C Abundance

δ13C abundance was determined using an elemental analyzer–isotope ratio mass spectrometry system (EA-IRMS), consisting of an elemental analyzer (vario ISOTOPE cube, Elementar, Hanau, Germany) and an isotope ratio mass spectrometer (IRMS Isoprime 100, Elementar, Manchester, UK). The carbon isotope composition (δ13C) was calculated by comparing the isotope ratio of the sample with that of the reference standard [61,62]:
δ13C (‰) = (Rsa/RPDB − 1) × 1000
where Rsa is the 13C/12C ratio of the sample (Rsa = (13C/12Csa), and RPDB is the 13C/12C ratio of the standard (RPDB = 13C/12C = 0.0112372). For labeled plants, 13C abundance is commonly expressed as atom% (13C). The conversion from δ13C (‰) to atom% was performed using the following equation:
Atom(%) = [(δ13C + 1000) × RPDB]/{[(δ13C + 1000) × RPDB] + 1000 × 100}
To exclude the influence of natural ^13C abundance, atom% (13C) was measured in unlabeled seedlings (Chinese fir No. 36, Chinese fir No. 41, and Schima superba). The mean natural abundance (atom% 13C) in roots, stems, and leaves was 1.08%. After 13CO2 pulse labeling, atom% 13C in roots, stems, and leaves of all seedlings was higher than the corresponding natural abundance.

4.3.3. Determination of Growth Indicators

Before transplanting, 15 seedlings of Chinese fir No. 36, Chinese fir No. 41, and Schima superba were randomly selected, separated into roots, stems, and leaves, and oven-treated at 105 °C for 30 min to deactivate enzymes. The temperature was then reduced to 75 °C and samples were dried to constant mass. Dry weights of roots, stems, and leaves were recorded as the initial biomass of each organ. At the time of transplanting, seedling height and ground diameter were measured for each seedling and recorded as initial values. At the end of the experiment, following destructive harvest, seedling height and ground diameter were measured again and recorded as final values. Growth performance was evaluated as the increment in seedling height and ground diameter (final minus initial).
After destructive harvest, roots, stems, and leaves were separated and their dry weights were determined as the final organ biomass. Biomass change was assessed as the increment in whole-plant biomass (final minus initial). The root-to-shoot ratio was calculated as root biomass divided by aboveground biomass.

4.3.4. Determination of Physiological Indicators

Before destructive harvest, photosynthetic parameters were measured on a clear day between 08:30 and 11:00 using a LI-6400 portable photosynthesis system (LI-COR Biosciences, Lincoln, NE, USA). The measurement conditions were set as follows: photosynthetically active radiation intensity 1000 μmol·m−2·s−1, reference CO2 concentration 400 μmol·m−2·s−1, leaf chamber gas flow rate 500 μmol·s−1, and leaf chamber temperature was naturally controlled with ambient temperature. Measurements were conducted on healthy, fully expanded mature leaves from newly formed shoots of each seedling. For phosphorus determination, oven-dried samples from each plant organ were digested using a concentrated HNO3–HClO4 acid digestion procedure, and total P concentration (g·kg−1) in the digest was quantified using the molybdenum–antimony anti-spectrophotometric colorimetric method [63].

4.4. Data Statistics and Analysis

Two-way analysis of variance (two-way ANOVA) was used to test the main effects of neighbor relatedness, P-supply gradient, and their interaction on AMF colonization, seedling growth, and the dynamics of 13C enrichment and phosphorus (P) concentration in tissues of the target Chinese fir. Post hoc multiple comparisons were performed to test treatment differences among P-supply gradients within each neighbor-relatedness level using the least significant difference (LSD) test (p < 0.05). Data were tested for normality and homogeneity of variance prior to ANOVA, and were transformed when necessary to meet ANOVA assumptions. Linear regression analyses were conducted to examine relationships between whole-plant 13C abundance (atom% 13C) and whole-plant total P concentration (g·kg−1) of the focal Chinese fir under different neighbor P-supply gradients and neighbor relatedness combinations. Pearson correlation analysis was used to evaluate associations among mycorrhizal colonization, 13C enrichment, growth traits, photosynthetic parameters, and P concentrations in Chinese fir. All data are presented as mean ± standard error (SE). Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS 26.0 (IBM, Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). Figures were generated using Origin 2022 (OriginLab, Northampton, MA, USA).

5. Conclusions

When neighboring plants experienced phosphorus limitation, Chinese fir showed increased AMF colonization in roots and enhanced leaf photosynthetic performance, accompanied by greater accumulation of photosynthetically derived carbon and higher phosphorus uptake. The allocation pattern depended on neighbor relatedness. When the neighbor was a conspecific kin individual, Chinese fir exhibited increased belowground 13C enrichment, which may partially compensate for the AMF carbon demand (i.e., the C reward) for the P-limited kin neighbor. In contrast, when the neighbor was a heterospecific unrelated-kin individual, Chinese fir exhibited increased stem 13C enrichment and stem phosphorus accumulation, coinciding with enhanced aboveground growth. Overall, this study provides initial evidence that AMF-mediated networks are involved in Chinese fir responses to neighbor P limitation and suggests that kin recognition may modulate this response. These findings have practical implications for forestry management, particularly for the establishment and tending of Chinese fir plantations. Understanding carbon and phosphorus regulation via AMF networks and kin recognition could help optimize mixed planting patterns, neighbor configuration, and phosphorus fertilization strategies, thereby improving resource use efficiency and the sustainability of Chinese fir production in practice.
Future studies can integrate multi-omics technologies to identify the key genes and signaling molecules mediating kin recognition, AMF signal transduction, and the regulation of carbon and phosphorus allocation, and to further clarify their underlying molecular regulatory pathways. Additionally, independent Room replication (i.e., more than one independent Room per treatment) should be incorporated whenever feasible. Where the number of available Rooms is limited, repeating the experiment across multiple independent runs (temporal replication) and applying treatment–Room rotation between runs may help reduce potential Room effects. In the meantime, standardized randomization and periodic rotation of pot positions within each Room, together with continuous monitoring of environmental variables, would further improve experimental rigor and enhance reproducibility and generalizability, thereby enabling a more comprehensive assessment of AMF-network functional dynamics under heterogeneous P supply and their dependence on neighbor relatedness.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, P.W.; methodology, Z.Z., H.W., H.H., Y.Y. and J.L.; investigation, Z.Z. and H.H.; data curation, Z.Z., Y.Y. and J.L.; writing—original draft preparation, Z.Z. and H.W.; writing—review and editing, all authors; visualization, Z.Z., supervision, P.W. and H.W.; funding acquisition, P.W. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The study was funded by the Key Program of Natural Science of Fujian Province, China (Grant No. 2024J02010), and the 8th Special Project on Seedling Research and Development of Forestry Science and Technology in Fujian Province, China (Grant No. ZMGG-0801).

Data Availability Statement

The dataset supporting this study is included in the article. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

We are very grateful to the editors, reviewers and experts who made suggestions for the manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Abbreviations

The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
KinThe focal Chinese fir was grown adjacent to a kin neighbor plant
CloseThe focal Chinese fir was grown adjacent to a close neighbor plant
UnrelatedThe focal Chinese fir was grown adjacent to an unrelated neighbor plant
P1–P0Neighbor P supply levels of zero P
P1–P0.5Neighbor P supply levels of low P
P1–P1Neighbor P supply levels of P sufficiency
AMFArbuscular mycorrhizal fungi 
W13CWhole-plant 13C abundance
R13CRoot 13C abundance
S13CStem 13C abundance
L13CLeaf 13C abundance
SHSeedling height increment
GDGround diameter increment
WBWhole-plant biomass increment
RSRoot-to-shoot ratio
PnNet photosynthetic rate
Gsstomatal conductance
CiIntercellular CO2 concentration
TrTranspiration rate
WPWhole-plant P concentration
RPRoot P concentration
SPStem P concentration
LPLeaf P concentration

Appendix A

Plants 15 00703 g0a1
Figure A1. Gas-exchange parameters and growth increments of the focal Chinese fir under different neighbor P-supply gradients and relatedness combinations. (a) Net photosynthetic rate (Pn), (b) stomatal conductance (Gs), (c) intercellular CO2 concentration (Ci), (d) transpiration rate (Tr), (e) seedling height increment (SH), and (f) ground diameter increment (GD). Kin, Close, and Unrelated indicate that the focal Chinese fir was grown adjacent to a kin, closely related, or unrelated neighbor plant, respectively. P1–P0, P1–P0.5, and P1–P1 represent the zero P, low P, and sufficient P treatments applied to the neighbor plant, respectively. Data are presented as mean ± SE (n = 5). Asterisks indicate significant differences (p < 0.05).
Figure A1. Gas-exchange parameters and growth increments of the focal Chinese fir under different neighbor P-supply gradients and relatedness combinations. (a) Net photosynthetic rate (Pn), (b) stomatal conductance (Gs), (c) intercellular CO2 concentration (Ci), (d) transpiration rate (Tr), (e) seedling height increment (SH), and (f) ground diameter increment (GD). Kin, Close, and Unrelated indicate that the focal Chinese fir was grown adjacent to a kin, closely related, or unrelated neighbor plant, respectively. P1–P0, P1–P0.5, and P1–P1 represent the zero P, low P, and sufficient P treatments applied to the neighbor plant, respectively. Data are presented as mean ± SE (n = 5). Asterisks indicate significant differences (p < 0.05).
Plants 15 00703 g0a1
Plants 15 00703 g0a2
Figure A2. Responses of neighboring plants to different P-supply treatments. (a) Root AMF colonization rate, (b) whole-plant P concentration, and (c) net photosynthetic rate (Pn). No. 36 and No. 41 indicate the kin neighbor (Chinese fir clone No. 36) and the close-kin neighbor (Chinese fir clone No. 41), respectively, whereas Ss indicates the unrelated neighbor plant (Schima superba). P0, P0.5, and P1 represent the zero P, low P, and sufficient P treatments, respectively. Data are presented as mean ± SE (n = 5). Asterisks indicate significant differences (p < 0.05).
Figure A2. Responses of neighboring plants to different P-supply treatments. (a) Root AMF colonization rate, (b) whole-plant P concentration, and (c) net photosynthetic rate (Pn). No. 36 and No. 41 indicate the kin neighbor (Chinese fir clone No. 36) and the close-kin neighbor (Chinese fir clone No. 41), respectively, whereas Ss indicates the unrelated neighbor plant (Schima superba). P0, P0.5, and P1 represent the zero P, low P, and sufficient P treatments, respectively. Data are presented as mean ± SE (n = 5). Asterisks indicate significant differences (p < 0.05).
Plants 15 00703 g0a2
Table A1. Natural and measured whole-plant atom% 13C of neighboring plants under different phosphorus supply treatments.
Table A1. Natural and measured whole-plant atom% 13C of neighboring plants under different phosphorus supply treatments.
Neighboring
Chinese Fir Plant		Phosphorus
Supply Treatment		Natural Whole-Plant 13C Atom (%)Determined Whole-Plant 13C Atom (%)
No. 36P01.081.10
P0.51.081.09
P11.081.10
No. 41P01.081.14
P0.51.081.09
P11.081.10
SsP01.081.11
P0.51.081.10
P11.081.09
Note: No. 36 and No. 41 indicate the kin neighbor (Chinese fir clone No. 36) and the close-kin neighbor (Chinese fir clone No. 41), respectively, whereas Ss indicates the unrelated neighbor plant (Schima superba). P0, P0.5, and P1 represent the zero P, low P, and sufficient P treatments, respectively.

References

  1. Yang, S.Y.; Lin, W.Y.; Hsiao, Y.M.; Chiou, T.J. Milestones in understanding transport, sensing, and signaling of the plant nutrient phosphorus. Plant Cell 2024, 36, 1504–1523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Divjot, K.; Kusam, L.R.; Tanvir, K.; Neelam, Y.; Ajar, N.Y.; Manish, K.; Vinod, K.; Harcharan, S.D.; Anil, K.S. Biodiversity, current developments and potential biotechnological applications of phosphorus-solubilizing and -mobilizing microbes: A review. Pedosphere 2021, 31, 43–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Cunha, H.F.V.; Andersen, K.M.; Lugli, L.F.; Santana, F.D.; Aleixo, I.F.; Moraes, A.M.; Garcia, S.; Ponzio, R.D.; Mendoza, E.O.; Brum, B.; et al. Direct evidence for phosphorus limitation on amazon forest productivity. Nature 2022, 608, 558–562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Singh, M.; Chauhan, A.; Srivastava, D.K.; Singhb, P.K. Unveiling arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi: The hidden heroes of soil to control the plant pathogens. Arch. Phytopathol. Plant Prot. 2024, 57, 427–457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Pan, X.Y.; Li, H.T.; Wu, J.H.; Li, Q.; Zhou, Y.; Yang, P.Z. Mycorrhiza inoculation and soil-available phosphorus modulate phosphorus acquisition strategies of alfalfa. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2025, 73, 14265–14279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Cardini, A.; Pellegrino, E.; Declerck, S.; Maryline, C.S.; Mazzolai, B.; Ercoli, L. Direct transfer of zinc between plants is channelled by common mycorrhizal network of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and evidenced by changes in expression of zinc transporter genes in fungus and plant. Environ. Microbiol. 2021, 23, 5883–5900. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Wang, Z.H.; Liang, J.W.; Kuang, Y.X.; Li, X.; Chen, H.; Tang, M.; Hu, W.T. Cultivation of arbuscular mycorrhizal Broussonetia papyrifera seedlings by planting the mycorrhizal nurse plant downwards. Mycorrhiza 2022, 32, 203–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Magkourilou, E.; Bell, C.A.; Daniell, T.J.; Field, K.J. The functionality of arbuscular mycorrhizal networks across scales of experimental complexity and ecological relevance. Funct. Ecol. 2024, 39, 1384–1399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Wang, L.; Guo, S.Q.; Zhang, J.L.; Field, K.J.; Baquerizo, M.D.; Souza, T.A.F.D.; Lee, S.J.; Hijri, M.; Shang, X.Q.; Sun, D.D.; et al. Arbuscular mycorrhizal networks—A climate-smart blueprint for agriculture. Plant Commun. 2025, 6, e105166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Rajamanickam, V.; Saripalli, G.; Sevanthi, A.M.; Singh, N.; Singh, V.K.; Pandey, R. Genetic architecture of photosynthesis and yield related traits in response to low phosphorus stress in wheat using GWAS. J. Plant Growth Regul. 2025, Prepublish, 1–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Tedersoo, L.; Bahram, M.; Zobel, M. How mycorrhizal associations drive plant population and community biology. Science 2020, 367, eaba1223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Olsson, P.A.; Johansen, A. Lipid and fatty acid composition of hyphae and spores of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi at different growth stages. Mycol. Res. 2000, 104, 429–434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Weremijewicz, J.; Sternberg, L.D.S.L.O.; Janos, D.P. Common mycorrhizal networks amplify competition by preferential mineral nutrient allocation to large host plants. New Phytol. 2016, 212, 461–471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Awaydul, A.; Zhu, W.Y.; Yuan, Y.G.; Xiao, J.; Hu, H.; Chen, X.; Koide, R.T.; Cheng, L. Common mycorrhizal networks influence the distribution of mineral nutrients between an invasive plant, Solidago canadensis, and a native plant, Kummerowa striata. Mycorrhiza 2019, 29, 29–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Fellbaum, C.R.; Mensah, J.A.; Cloos, A.J.; Strahan, G.E.; Pfeffer, P.E.; Kiers, E.T.; Bucking, H. Fungal nutrient allocation in common mycorrhizal networks is regulated by the carbon source strength of individual host plants. New Phytol. 2014, 203, 646–656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Zhong, Y.L.; Chu, C.J. Arbuscular mycorrhizal trees influence the latitudinal beta-diversity gradient of tree communities in forests worldwide. Nat. Commun. 2021, 12, 3137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Tedersoo, L.; Bahram, M.; Cajthaml, T.; Põlme, S.; Hiiesalu, I.; Anslan, S.; Harend, H.; Buegger, F.; Pritsch, K.; Koricheva, J.; et al. Tree diversity and species identity effects on soil fungi, protists and animals are context dependent. ISME J. 2016, 10, 346–362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Walder, F.; Niemann, H.; Natarajan, M.; Lehmann, M.F.; Boller, T.; Wiemken, A. Mycorrhizal networks: Common goods of plants shared under unequal terms of trade. Plant Physiol. 2012, 159, 789–797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Figueiredo, A.F.; Boy, J.; Guggenberger, G. Common mycorrhizae network: A review of the theories and mechanisms behind underground interactions. Front. Fungal Biol. 2021, 2, 735299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Salmeron-Santiago, I.A.; Martínez-Trujillo, M.; Valdez-Alarcón, J.J.; Pedraza-Santos, M.E.; Santoyo, G.; Pozo, M.J.; Chávez-Bárcenas, A.T. An updated review on the modulation of carbon partitioning and allocation in arbuscular mycorrhizal plants. Microorganisms 2022, 10, 75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Kong, C.H.; Zhang, S.Z.; Li, Y.H.; Xia, Z.C.; Yang, X.F.; Meiners, S.; Wang, P. Plant neighbor detection and allelochemical response are driven by root-secreted signaling chemicals. Nat. Commun. 2018, 9, 3867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Sher, J.; Zheng, Y.L.; Burns, J.H.; Jan, G.; Zhang, J.L. Kin recognition in plants-an ecological perspective: An overview of plant kin recognition under different resources, consequences and future challenges. J. Plant Interact. 2025, 20, 2548579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Dudley, S.A.; File, A.L. Kin recognition in an annual plant. Biol. Lett. 2007, 3, 435–438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Asay, A.K.; Simard, S.W.; Dudley, S.A. Altering neighborhood relatedness and species composition affects interior douglas fir size and morphological traits with context-dependent responses. Front. Ecol. Evol. 2020, 8, 578524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Xu, Y.; Cheng, H.F.; Kong, C.H.; Meiners, S.J. Intra-specific kin recognition contributes to inter-specific allelopathy: A case study of allelopathic rice interference with paddy weeds. Plant Cell Environ. 2021, 44, 3709–3721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Booth, M.G.; Hoeksema, J.D. Mycorrhizal networks counteract competitive effects of canopy trees on seedling survival. Ecology 2010, 91, 2294–2302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Anten, N.P.R.; Chen, B.J.W. Detect thy family: Mechanisms, ecology and agricultural aspects of kin recognition in plants. Plant Cell Environ. 2021, 44, 1059–1071. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Zhao, B.W.; Bian, L.M.; Feng, Q.H.; Wu, J.Z.; Zhang, X.F.; Zheng, R.H.; Zheng, X.Y.; Yang, Z.Y.; Chen, Z.Q.; Wu, H.X.; et al. Development of an advanced-generation multi-objective breeding population for the 4th cycle of Chinese fir (Cunninghamia lanceolata (Lamb.) Hook.). Forests 2023, 14, 1658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Chen, Y.; Peng, Z.Q.; Wu, C.; Ma, Z.H.; Ding, G.H.; Cao, G.Q.; Ruan, S.N.; Lin, S.Z. Genetic diversity and variation of Chinese fir from Fujian province and Taiwan, China, based on ISSR markers. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0175571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Li, L.; McCormackc, M.L.; Chen, F.S.; Wang, H.M.; Ma, Z.Q.; Guo, D.L. Different responses of absorptive roots and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi to fertilization provide diverse nutrient acquisition strategies in Chinese fir. For. Ecol. Manag. 2019, 433, 64–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Cao, Y.; Li, N.N.; Lin, J.Q.; Zhang, Y.; Ma, X.Q.; Wu, P.F. Root system-rhizosphere soil-bulk soil interactions in different Chinese fir clones based on fungi community diversity change. Front. Ecol. Evol. 2022, 10, 1028686. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Li, Y.C.; Zhang, H.; Tian, Y.L.; Farooq, T.H.; Li, M.; Ma, X.Q.; Wu, P.F. L-arginine enhances stress resilience against P deficiency of Chinese fir in root system: Physiological and proteomics analysis. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2024, 225, 105864. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Li, Y.C.; Zhang, H.; Liu, J.; Li, M.; Farooq, T.H.; Ma, X.Q.; Yan, X.L.; Wu, P.F. Differential effects of exogenous VOCs on the growth and stress responses of Cunninghamia lanceolata seedlings under low phosphorus. BMC Plant Biol. 2025, 25, 299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Charters, M.D.; Sait, S.M.; Field, K.J. Aphid herbivory drives asymmetry in carbon for nutrient exchange between plants and an arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus. Curr. Biol. 2020, 30, 1801–1808. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Song, Y.Y.; Wang, M.; Zeng, R.; Groten, K.; Baldwin, I.T. Priming and filtering of antiherbivore defences among Nicotiana attenuata plants connected by mycorrhizal networks. Plant Cell Environ. 2019, 42, 2945–2961. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Kachroo, A.; Kachroo, P. Mobile signals in systemic acquired resistance. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2020, 58, 41–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Song, Y.Y.; Zeng, R.S.; Xu, J.F.; Li, J.; Shen, X.; Yihdego, W.G. Interplant communication of tomato plants through underground common mycorrhizal networks. PLoS ONE 2010, 5, e13324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Tian, Y.L.; Xu, J.J.; Lian, X.Q.; Wei, B.; Ma, X.Q.; Wu, P.F. Effect of Gintraradices on root morphology, biomass production and phosphorous use efficiency of Chinese fir seedlings under low phosphorus stress. Front. Plant Sci. 2023, 13, 1095772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Liu, Q.Y.; Wang, H.O.; Ma, X.D. Salinity effects on arbuscular mycelium network-mediated performance of saltcedar and camelhorn seedlings. Acta Oecologica 2025, 129, 104127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Fellbauma, C.R.; Gachomo, E.W.; Beesetty, Y.; Choudhari, S.; Strahan, G.D.; Pfeffer, P.E.; Kiers, E.T.; Bücking, H. Carbon availability triggers fungal nitrogen uptake and transport in arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2012, 109, 2666–2671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Fellbaum, C.R.; Mensah, J.A.; Pfeffer, P.E.; Kiers, E.T.; Bücking, H. Role Carbon Fungal nutrient uptake and transport. Plant Signal. Behav. 2012, 7, 1509–1512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Duan, S.L.; Feng, G.; Limpens, E.; Bonfante, P.; Xie, X.N.; Zhang, L. Cross-kingdom nutrient exchange in the plant–arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus–bacterium continuum. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2024, 22, 773–790. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Kiers, E.T.; Duhamel, M.; Beesetty, Y.; Mensah, J.A.; Franken, O.; Verbruggen, E.; Fellbaum, C.R.; Kowalchuk, G.A.; Hart, M.M.; Bago, A.; et al. Reciprocal rewards stabilize cooperation in the mycorrhizal symbiosis. Science 2011, 333, 880–882. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Huang, H.; Liu, S.J.; Du, Y.; Tang, J.J.; Hu, L.L.; Chen, X. Carbon allocation mediated by arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi alters the soil microbial community under various phosphorus levels. Fungal Ecol. 2023, 62, 101227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Xia, X.X.; Yan, S.B.; Wang, P.; Kong, C.H. A meta-analysis of response strategies and interfering factors of kin recognition in plants. Plants Base 2025, 14, 683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Lepik, A.; Abakumova, M.; Zobel, K.; Semchenko, M. Kin recognition is density-dependent and uncommon among temperate grassland plants. Funct. Ecol. 2012, 26, 1214–1220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Chen, B.J.W.; During, H.J.; Anten, N.P.R. Detect thy neighbor: Identity recognition at the root level in plants. Plant Sci. 2012, 195, 157–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Casal, J.J. Shade avoidance. Arab. Book 2012, 10, e0157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. File, A.L.; Klironomos, J.; Maherali, H.; Dudley, S.A. Plant kin recognition enhances abundance of symbiotic microbial partner. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e45648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Manoj, P.; Amitava, R.; Vijay, S.M.; Vijai, K.G.; Kiran, R.; Mahipal, C.; Gopal, T.; Pankaj, K.M.; Arunava, P.; Jaideep, K.B.; et al. The potential of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in C cycling: A review. Arch. Microbiol. 2020, 202, 1581–1596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Ji, B.; Bever, D.J. Plant preferential allocation and fungal reward decline with soil phosphorus: Implications for mycorrhizal mutualism. Ecosphere 2016, 7, e01256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Johnson, D.; Gilbert, L. Interplant signalling through hyphal networks. New Phytol. 2015, 205, 1448–1453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Luo, X.; Liu, Y.I.; Li, S.Y.; He, X.H. Interplant carbon and nitrogen transfers mediated by common arbuscular mycorrhizal networks: Beneficial pathways for system functionality. Front. Plant Sci. 2023, 14, 1169310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Durant, E.; Hoysted, G.A.; Howard, N.; Steven, M.S.; Childs, D.Z.; Johnson, D.; Field, K.J. Herbivore-driven disruption of arbuscular mycorrhizal carbon-for-nutrient exchange is ameliorated by neighboring plants. Curr. Biol. 2023, 33, 2566–2573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Wu, W.J.; Wang, P.; Chen, N.L.; Ma, X.Q.; Lin, W.J.; Wu, P.F. Root foraging ability for phosphorus of different Chinese fir family seedlings under low phosphorus supply. J. Fujian Agric. For. Univ. 2019, 48, 174–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Liu, H.F.; Wu, Y.; Xu, H.W.; Ai, Z.M.; Zhang, J.Y.; Liu, G.B.; Xue, S. N enrichment affects the arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi-mediated relationship between a C4 grass and a legume. Plant Physiol. 2021, 187, 1519–1533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Zeng, X.M.; Fan, Y.X.; Lin, K.M.; Yuan, P.; Zhao, P.P.; Chen, Y.R.; Xu, J.G.; Chen, Y.M. Characteristics of soil phosphorus fractions of different vegetation types in subtropical forests and their driving factors. Chin. J. Appl. Ecol. 2018, 29, 2156–2162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Wu, P.F.; Ma, X.Q.; Tigabu, M.; Wang, C.; Liu, A.Q.; Oden, P.C. Root morphological plasticity and biomass production of two Chinese fir clones with high phosphorus efficiency under low phosphorus stress. Can. J. For. Res. 2011, 41, 228–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Li, Y.C.; Wang, N.M.; Zhang, H.; Lin, W.J.; Ma, X.Q.; Wu, P.F. Analysis of root kin recognition ability of Chinese fir in low phosphorus environments based on 13C labeling. Acta Ecol. Sin. 2024, 44, 10827–10837. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Phillips, J.M. Improved procedures for clearing roots and staining parasitic and vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi for rapid assessment of infection. Trans. Br. Mycol. Soc. 1970, 55, 158–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Gao, H.H.; Wang, J.J.; Zhou, P.S.; Yu, W.J.; Kang, H.Z. Carbon and nitrogen allocation in organs of Quercus variabilis seedlings by 13C and 15N tracer technique. J. Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ. 2017, 35, 67–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Cai, Z.L.; Zhao, H.B.; Cai, J.C.; Wu, Z.M.; Zhou, G.Y.; Li, Z.J.; Wang, X.; Qiu, Z.J. Retention and distribution dynamics of photosynthetic carbon in Liquidambar formosana and Sapium discolar seedlings by 13C labeling. Chin. J. Appl. Environ. Biol. 2023, 29, 408–413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Zou, X.H.; Hu, Y.N.; Wei, D.; Chen, S.T.; Wu, P.F.; Ma, X.Q. Correlation between endogenous hormone and the adaptability of Chinese fir with high phosphorus-use efficiency to low phosphorus stress. Chin. J. Plant Ecol. 2019, 43, 139–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Plants 15 00703 g001
Figure 1. Typical AMF structures in Chinese fir roots: (a) hyphae, (b) vesicles, and (c) arbuscules.
Figure 1. Typical AMF structures in Chinese fir roots: (a) hyphae, (b) vesicles, and (c) arbuscules.
Plants 15 00703 g001
Plants 15 00703 g002
Figure 2. Responses of the focal Chinese fir (clone No. 36) to neighbor P supply gradients under different levels of neighbor relatedness. (a) AMF colonization rate. (b) Whole-plant dry mass biomass increment. (c) Root-to-shoot ratio. (d) Whole-plant 13C abundance (atom% 13C). (e–g) 13C abundance (atom% 13C) in roots (e), stems (f), and leaves (g). (h–k) Total P concentration in the whole plant (h), roots (i), stems (j), and leaves (k). Kin, Close, and Unrelated indicate that the focal Chinese fir was grown adjacent to kin, Close, or unrelated neighbor plant, respectively. P1–P0, P1–P0.5, and P1–P1 denote neighbor P supply levels of zero P, low P, and P sufficiency, respectively. Data are presented as mean ± SE (n = 5). Asterisks indicate significant differences among treatments (p < 0.05, LSD test).
Figure 2. Responses of the focal Chinese fir (clone No. 36) to neighbor P supply gradients under different levels of neighbor relatedness. (a) AMF colonization rate. (b) Whole-plant dry mass biomass increment. (c) Root-to-shoot ratio. (d) Whole-plant 13C abundance (atom% 13C). (e–g) 13C abundance (atom% 13C) in roots (e), stems (f), and leaves (g). (h–k) Total P concentration in the whole plant (h), roots (i), stems (j), and leaves (k). Kin, Close, and Unrelated indicate that the focal Chinese fir was grown adjacent to kin, Close, or unrelated neighbor plant, respectively. P1–P0, P1–P0.5, and P1–P1 denote neighbor P supply levels of zero P, low P, and P sufficiency, respectively. Data are presented as mean ± SE (n = 5). Asterisks indicate significant differences among treatments (p < 0.05, LSD test).
Plants 15 00703 g002
Plants 15 00703 g003
Figure 3. Linear regressions between whole-plant ^13C abundance (atom% 13C) and whole-plant total P concentration (g·kg−1) of the focal Chinese fir under different neighbor P supply gradients and neighbor relatedness combinations. Panels (a–c) represent the P1–P0 treatment (neighbor zero P), panels (d–f) represent the P1–P0.5 treatment (neighbor low P), and panels (g–i) represent the P1–P1 treatment (neighbor P sufficiency). Within each row, columns correspond to the Kin, Close, and Unrelated combinations, respectively. Points represent individual replicates; solid lines indicate fitted linear regressions; shaded areas indicate 95% confidence bands. Regression equations and R2 values are shown in each panel. Asterisks denote significant regressions (p < 0.05). Kin, Close, and Unrelated indicate that the focal Chinese fir was grown adjacent to kin, closely related, or unrelated neighbor plant, respectively. P1–P0, P1–P0.5, and P1–P1 denote neighbor P supply levels of zero P, low P, and P sufficiency, respectively. Asterisks indicate significant correlations (p < 0.05).
Figure 3. Linear regressions between whole-plant ^13C abundance (atom% 13C) and whole-plant total P concentration (g·kg−1) of the focal Chinese fir under different neighbor P supply gradients and neighbor relatedness combinations. Panels (a–c) represent the P1–P0 treatment (neighbor zero P), panels (d–f) represent the P1–P0.5 treatment (neighbor low P), and panels (g–i) represent the P1–P1 treatment (neighbor P sufficiency). Within each row, columns correspond to the Kin, Close, and Unrelated combinations, respectively. Points represent individual replicates; solid lines indicate fitted linear regressions; shaded areas indicate 95% confidence bands. Regression equations and R2 values are shown in each panel. Asterisks denote significant regressions (p < 0.05). Kin, Close, and Unrelated indicate that the focal Chinese fir was grown adjacent to kin, closely related, or unrelated neighbor plant, respectively. P1–P0, P1–P0.5, and P1–P1 denote neighbor P supply levels of zero P, low P, and P sufficiency, respectively. Asterisks indicate significant correlations (p < 0.05).
Plants 15 00703 g003
Plants 15 00703 g004
Figure 4. Pearson correlation analysis among mycorrhizal colonization, 13C enrichment, growth traits, photosynthetic parameters, and phosphorus (P) concentrations in Chinese fir. Colors indicate the Pearson correlation coefficient (red, positive; blue, negative), and color intensity reflects the magnitude of the correlation. AMF: mycorrhizal colonization rate; W13C: whole-plant 13C abundance; R13C: root 13C abundance; S13C: stem 13C abundance; L13C: leaf 13C abundance; SH: seedling height increment; GD: ground diameter increment; WB: whole-plant biomass increment; RS: root-to-shoot ratio; Pn: net photosynthetic rate; Gs: stomatal conductance; Ci: intercellular CO2 concentration; Tr: transpiration rate; WP: whole-plant P concentration; RP: root P concentration; SP: stem P concentration; LP: leaf P concentration. Asterisks indicate significant Pearson correlations (p < 0.05).
Figure 4. Pearson correlation analysis among mycorrhizal colonization, 13C enrichment, growth traits, photosynthetic parameters, and phosphorus (P) concentrations in Chinese fir. Colors indicate the Pearson correlation coefficient (red, positive; blue, negative), and color intensity reflects the magnitude of the correlation. AMF: mycorrhizal colonization rate; W13C: whole-plant 13C abundance; R13C: root 13C abundance; S13C: stem 13C abundance; L13C: leaf 13C abundance; SH: seedling height increment; GD: ground diameter increment; WB: whole-plant biomass increment; RS: root-to-shoot ratio; Pn: net photosynthetic rate; Gs: stomatal conductance; Ci: intercellular CO2 concentration; Tr: transpiration rate; WP: whole-plant P concentration; RP: root P concentration; SP: stem P concentration; LP: leaf P concentration. Asterisks indicate significant Pearson correlations (p < 0.05).
Plants 15 00703 g004
Plants 15 00703 g005
Figure 5. Schematic diagram of the experimental apparatus for the “Chinese fir–AMF–P-limited neighbor” symbiotic network system, with 5 biological replicates per treatment.
Figure 5. Schematic diagram of the experimental apparatus for the “Chinese fir–AMF–P-limited neighbor” symbiotic network system, with 5 biological replicates per treatment.
Plants 15 00703 g005
Table 1. Two-way ANOVA analysis with Phosphorus supply and Neighbor relatedness on AMF colonization, seedling growth, and the dynamics of 13C enrichment and P concentration in tissues of the focal Chinese fir.
Table 1. Two-way ANOVA analysis with Phosphorus supply and Neighbor relatedness on AMF colonization, seedling growth, and the dynamics of 13C enrichment and P concentration in tissues of the focal Chinese fir.
Phosphorus
Supply (A)		Neighbor
Relatedness (B)		A × B
AMF**nsns
W13C***ns
R13C***ns
S13C**nsns
L13C**nsns
SHnsnsns
GDns**ns
WBnsnsns
RSnsnsns
Pn**nsns
Gs**nsns
Ci**ns*
Tr*****
WP**ns**
RPnsnsns
SP**ns**
LPnsnsns
Note: AMF: mycorrhizal colonization rate; W13C: whole-plant 13C abundance; R13C: root 13C abundance; S13C: stem 13C abundance; L13C: leaf 13C abundance; SH: seedling height increment; GD: ground diameter increment; WB: whole-plant biomass increment; RS: root-to-shoot ratio; Pn: net photosynthetic rate; Gs: stomatal conductance; Ci: intercellular CO2 concentration; Tr: transpiration rate; WP: whole-plant P concentration; RP: root P concentration; SP: stem P concentration; LP: leaf P concentration. ‘*’ and ‘**’ indicate significant differences at p < 0.05, and p < 0.01, respectively, and ‘ns’ represents no significant difference.
Table 2. The initial value of seedling height and ground diameter of Chinese fir and Schima superba.
Table 2. The initial value of seedling height and ground diameter of Chinese fir and Schima superba.
Experimental SeedlingsInitial Seedling Height (cm)Initial Ground Diameter (mm)
Chinese fir No. 3621.91 ± 0.303.08 ± 0.06
Chinese fir No. 41 23.93 ± 0.843.08 ± 0.14
Schima superba20.17 ± 0.652.93 ± 0.11
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhao, Z.; Wei, H.; Hu, H.; Yao, Y.; Liang, J.; Wu, P. Kinship Modulates Carbon Allocation and Phosphorus Acquisition in Chinese Fir–AMF Networks Under Neighbor P Limitation. Plants 2026, 15, 703. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants15050703

AMA Style

Zhao Z, Wei H, Hu H, Yao Y, Liang J, Wu P. Kinship Modulates Carbon Allocation and Phosphorus Acquisition in Chinese Fir–AMF Networks Under Neighbor P Limitation. Plants. 2026; 15(5):703. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants15050703

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zhao, Zihao, Hongjian Wei, Hui Hu, Yuxin Yao, Jing Liang, and Pengfei Wu. 2026. "Kinship Modulates Carbon Allocation and Phosphorus Acquisition in Chinese Fir–AMF Networks Under Neighbor P Limitation" Plants 15, no. 5: 703. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants15050703

APA Style

Zhao, Z., Wei, H., Hu, H., Yao, Y., Liang, J., & Wu, P. (2026). Kinship Modulates Carbon Allocation and Phosphorus Acquisition in Chinese Fir–AMF Networks Under Neighbor P Limitation. Plants, 15(5), 703. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants15050703

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop