Next Article in Journal
Genomic Regions Associated with Drought Tolerance and Other Traits in Lentils (Lens sp.)
Previous Article in Journal
Natural and Anthropogenic Disturbances Modulate Plant Diversity in Coastal Dunes of the Northern Colombian Caribbean
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Phytochemistry, Antimicrobial, and Antibiofilm Properties of Malagasy Helichrysum manopappoides Essential Oil

by
Giusy Castagliuolo
1,
Alessia Sordillo
1,
Henintsoa Jean Baptiste Ramaminirina
2,
Daniela Di Girolamo
1,
Mario Varcamonti
1,
Natale Badalamenti
3,4,*,
Stephan Richard Rakotonandrasana
5,
Anna Zanfardino
1,
Maurizio Bruno
3,4 and
Vincent Emile Rasamison
2
1
Department of Biology, University of Naples Federico II, 80126 Naples, Italy
2
Department of Environment, Institut Universitaire de l’Innovation Technologique, University of Vakinankaratra, P.O. Box 180, Antsirabe 110, Madagascar
3
Department of Biological, Chemical and Pharmaceutical Sciences and Technologies (STEBICEF), Università degli Studi di Palermo, Viale delle Scienze, Ed. 17, 90128 Palermo, Italy
4
National Biodiversity Future Center (NBFC), 90133 Palermo, Italy
5
Department of Ethnobotany and Botany, National Center of Applied Pharmaceutical Research, P.O. Box 702, Antananarivo 101, Madagascar
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Plants 2026, 15(5), 672; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants15050672
Submission received: 19 January 2026 / Revised: 12 February 2026 / Accepted: 20 February 2026 / Published: 24 February 2026
(This article belongs to the Section Phytochemistry)

Abstract

Helichrysum Mill. is one of the largest genera in the Asteraceae family, and in Madagascar, a plant paradise with ca 14,000 species, 111 Helichrysum species are known, 110 of which are endemic. In this work, the essential oil of endemic Helichrysum manopappoides Humbert, obtained by steam distillation, was investigated chemically and biologically. The spectrometric data obtained by GC-MS (Gas Chromatography–Mass Spectrometry) analysis highlighted the presence of three major compounds, such as eucalyptol (7.38 ± 0.36%), α-humulene (14.75 ± 0.79%), and β-caryophyllene (19.78 ± 0.89%), which were also structurally confirmed by NMR (Nuclear Magnetic Resonance) spectroscopic investigation. Biological results showed potential antimicrobial, antioxidant, and antibiofilm effects of both the H manopappoides essential oil and the main components identified by GC-MS, enhancing an interesting approach for intestinal infections, being active against Escherichia coli, Listeria monocytogenes, Shigella sonnei, and Salmonella enterica ser. typhimurium strains.

1. Introduction

Helichrysum Mill., a term derived from the Greek words helios (sun) and chrysos (gold), both because the bright yellow color of the flower head resembles the sun and for the reason that the genus’ plants grow in sunny locations, from the coast to the high hills, is a heterogeny genus of plant species in the Asteraceae family. To date, a total of 564 accepted species has been estimated [1], making it one of the largest and most diverse genera, and one that presents important pharmacological implications among studied angiosperms. Although the African continent hosts the highest concentration of Helichrysum species, the genus is also well represented in Australia, Asia, and Europe [1,2]. Plants of this genus may be annuals, herbaceous perennials or shrubs, growing to a height of 60–90 cm (24–35 inches). The genus was a wastebasket taxon, and many of its members have been reclassified in smaller genera, most notably the everlastings, now in the genus Xerochrysum Tzvelev.
Among all, the Malagasy endemic H. manopappoides (Figure 1) object of this study is a suffrutescent, branched plant with stems covered by a white, cobweb-like tomentum. Leaves are simple, alternate, small, membranous, sessile, and narrowly linear-revolute (10–15 × 0.5–1). They spread at the base but become erect and arched, covered with the same tomentum on both surfaces, and are borne very close together on sterile branches. Inflorescences are homogamous capitula, which are campanulate (bell-shaped) and shortly pedunculate (stalked). They are arranged in dense terminal corymbs and consist of approximately 20 hermaphroditic yellow flowers. The corollas are regular, tubular, slightly widened towards the apex, and 5-toothed. The fruit is a glabrous achene bearing 1–7 short, filiform bristles that taper at the tip [3].
Helichrysum plants have a long history of use in traditional and popular medicine, where they have been employed to address ailments ranging from respiratory and urinary tract infections to skin inflammations, wound healing, and digestive issues. In Madagascar, it is the second genus after Croton, which is the richest in medicinal species, with 46 among the 111 species encountered [4]. Numerous scientific studies have validated the use of Helichrysum plant species in traditional medicine. Indeed, their antibacterial [5,6,7], antifungal [8], antioxidant [9,10], antiviral [11,12,13], anticancer [9,10], and anti-inflammatory [14] properties have been demonstrated through both in vitro and in vivo studies. For example, Helichrysum odoratissimum (L.) Sweet, used since ancient times for its healing properties and to soothe burns, is widely employed as an excipient in ointments and salves for acne and pimples, showed potential activity against Cutibacterium acnes [15,16]. In Turkey, the healing effects of Helichrysum graveolens (M.Bieb.) Sweet are recognized, through in vitro and in vivo studies by Süntar et al. [16], confirming its antioxidant and anti-inflammatory potential. In Italy, Helichrysum italicum (Roth) G.Don, used as herbal tea or infusion, is known for treating digestive disorders, including gastric and intestinal problems; Prof. Rigano et al. [17] demonstrated its antispasmodic activity in vitro on mouse ileum and in vivo on gastrointestinal transit.
These pharmacological effects are linked to diverse bioactive compounds in polar and non-polar extracts [18,19]. Furthermore, the concentration of these secondary metabolites is influenced by environmental factors [20,21], seasons [22], and geographical differences [23]. Metabolomic analysis revealed Helichrysum produces chlorogenic acids and phenolic derivatives, particularly flavonoids such as apigenin, quercetin, and kaempferol, contributing to antioxidant effects and reducing inflammation and oxidative stress [24,25,26,27]. Studies on mono-, di-, and trichlorogenic acids showed their role in antiviral activity [8,23,24,28].
There is also a lot of research coming from chemical and biological studies on the essential oils of this genus. Essential oils of H. italicum, Helichrysum arenarium (L.) Moench, Helichrysum basalticum Hilliard, Helichrysum saxatile Moris, and Helichrysum incarnatum DC., rich in terpenoids (α-pinene, β-pinene, limonene, nerol, neryl acetate, γ-terpinene, linalool, geraniol), exhibited strong antibacterial and anti-inflammatory properties [29,30,31,32,33]. The chemical composition of the leaves of different plants studied varies depending on the species analyzed and on the extraction method used. For example, Helichrysum petiolare Hilliard & B.L.Burtt leaves essential oil, extracted by steam distillation, was characterized by compounds such as α-pinene, 1,8-cineole, p-cymene, and β-caryophyllene [34], while oils obtained by hydrodistillation from the leaves of Helichrysum cymosum (L.) D.Don ex G.Don and Helichrysum stoechas (L.) Moench were mainly composed of (Z)-β- ocimene and α-pinene, respectively [35,36]. Interest in H. manopappoides is supported by evidence from other Helichrysum essential oils, which showed antimicrobial, anti-inflammatory, and antioxidant activities [37]. Samples from South African species, including H. odoratissimum, Helichrysum petiolare Hilliard & B.L.Burtt, H. Helichrysum cymosum (L.) D.Don ex G.Don, Helichrysum nudifolium (L.) Less., and Helichrysum kraussii Sch.Bip., exhibited significant in vitro biological activity [37,38], and α-humulene, one common sesquiterpene compound of Helichrysum essential oils, demonstrated antibacterial and antibiofilm effects against several bacterial strains [39,40].
In this context, the lack of chemical and biological data on Helichrysum manopappoides Humbert essential oil led us to investigate this endemic species. The H. manopappoides leaves essential oil was chemically characterized by gas chromatography (GC-MS) and NMR (Nuclear Magnetic Resonance) spectroscopy, and was tested and evaluated, together with its majority compounds, for its biological potential, investigating antimicrobial and antibiofilm properties against intestinal microorganisms such as Escherichia coli, Listeria monocytogenes, Shigella sonnei, Salmonella enterica ser. typhimurium, Staphylococcus aureus, and Candida albicans.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Chemical Composition of Essential Oil by GC-MS and 1D/2D-NMR

The steam-distilled essential oil, obtained from the leaves of H. manopappoides, was an orange-yellow oil. In total, fifty-three metabolites were identified by GC and GC-MS analysis and tabulated in Table 1 based on linear retention indices (LRIs) and retention times on an apolar DB-5 MS column and clearly divided, due to the chemical structure, into five different classes: monoterpene hydrocarbons, oxygenated monoterpenes, sesquiterpene hydrocarbons, oxygenated sesquiterpenes, and other compounds.
The phytochemical identification of the essential oil compounds, carried out by chromatographic analysis, was also confirmed by means of the NMR spectroscopic technique, in particular by exploiting the HMBC (Heteronuclear Multiple Bond Correlation) technique, which is a powerful 2D-NMR method that maps long-range connections (typically 2–3 bonds) between different types of nuclei, most commonly protons (1H) and carbon (13C), to identify, in this case, characteristic functional groups that are present in the structures of the majority of organic compounds, such as β-caryophyllene and α-humulene. α-Humulene and β-caryophyllene, two cyclic sesquiterpenes, have a very similar structure (Figure 2) but are characterized by specific spectroscopic signatures.
In fact, α-humulene presented two characteristic methyl groups, resonating at 18.27 and 15.01 ppm, respectively, for C-14 and C-15, which indicated the double bond and which presented 3JCH correlations with the H-9 and H-5 protons at 4.98 and 4.88 ppm, respectively (Figure 3). Finally, the carbon C-1 (140.83 ppm) of the double bond showed clear 3JCH correlation with the signal at 1.08 ppm, attributable to six methyl protons H-12 and H-13 (Figure 3).
In turn, the HMBC spectrum (Figure 3) showed a correlation of the vinyl protons H-15a and H-15b (4.84 and 4.95 ppm) with the sp3 secondary carbon C-7 (34.49 ppm) and the sp3 tertiary carbon C-9 (48.06 ppm) for β-caryophyllene. Similarly to α-humulene, the presence of the double bond at the C-4/-5 position is confirmed by the correlation between C-5 (124.96 ppm) and the protons CH3-14 at 1.45 ppm. These values are in agreement with what is reported in the literature [37,38].
From a compositional standpoint, to date, nothing has been reported in the literature regarding the essential oil of H. manopappoides. However, several essential oils from various Malagasy Helichrysum species have been investigated. Eucalyptol was found as a major compound, for example, in samples obtained by hydrodistillation from H. gymnocephalum (59.7%) [41], H. bracteiferum (17.7–27.3%) [41,42,43], and H. hypnoides (51.5%) [42]; α-humulene and β-caryophyllene, found in all Malagasy specimens examined, instead, were the majority metabolites of H. bracteiferum [43], H. cordifolium, H. faradifani, and H. hypnoides [38,42] essential oils. It would therefore appear that these compounds are common for this genus. Another study also reported the chemical composition of essential oils from six Helichrysum species endemic to Madagascar. H. benthamii and H. dubardii had their oil compositions dominated by α-pinene (23.1–50.8%) and eucalyptol (26.9–35.7%), respectively. β-Caryophyllene was the major compound of the oils from H. indutum (33.1%), H. bojerianum (16.1%) and H. diotoides (15.0%), whereas 7-epi-silphiperfol-5-en-13-oic acid (18.2–40.0%) and 7-epi-subergorgiol (7.6–14.8%) were identified in that from H. hirtum [44].

2.2. Antimicrobial Properties of H. manopappoides Essential Oil

The antimicrobial activity of H. manopappoides essential oil was evaluated by determining the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) against a panel of microorganisms representative of intestinal infections, including both Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria, as well as a pathogenic yeast. In addition to the model strains Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus, the microbial panel included Listeria monocytogenes, Shigella sonnei, Salmonella typhimurium, and Candida albicans.
As reported in Table 2, the sample exhibited a broad-spectrum antimicrobial activity, with MIC values ranging from 12 to 25 mg/mL. The lowest MIC values were observed against C. albicans (12 mg/mL), E. coli and L. monocytogenes (13 mg/mL), indicating a pronounced inhibitory effect against these microorganisms. Moderate activity was detected against S. aureus (15 mg/mL) and S. typhimurium (20 mg/mL), whereas S. sonnei appeared to be the least susceptible strain (25 mg/mL).
The antimicrobial activity of the main essential oil’s constituents was subsequently evaluated individually against the model strains E. coli and S. aureus (Table 3), revealing distinct activity profiles. Notably, eucalyptol and α-humulene displayed the lowest MIC values against E. coli (8 mg/mL), while a reduced efficacy was observed against S. aureus (MIC = 16 mg/mL for both compounds). In contrast, β-caryophyllene did not show significant antimicrobial activity against either strain at the tested concentrations (MIC > 16 mg/mL).
Among the individual components, α-humulene emerges as the most interesting compound, combining a relevant antimicrobial activity with a relatively high abundance within the essential oil (14.75 ± 0.79%). Although β-caryophyllene represents the most abundant constituent (19.78 ± 0.89%), its limited individual activity suggests a minor contribution to the direct antimicrobial effect. Eucalyptol, despite its good antimicrobial performance, is present at a lower percentage (7.38 ± 0.36%).
Overall, these findings suggest that the antimicrobial potential of H. manopappoides essential oil is mainly attributable to the combined action of its bioactive constituents, with α-humulene playing a key role and possible interactions among the essential oil’s components contributing to the observed broad-spectrum activity.
These data fall within the range commonly reported for essential oils of the genus Helichrysum, which are generally characterized by a moderate but broad-spectrum antimicrobial activity. In fact, previous studies on Helichrysum spp. have highlighted a marked variability in antimicrobial potency depending on chemical composition, plant origin, and microbial target, with MIC values often reported in the low-to-mid mg/mL range against both Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria, as well as yeasts [45,46]. In this context, the MIC range of 12–25 mg/mL observed here is fully consistent with the antimicrobial profiles described for other Helichrysum essential oils.
However, the comparable susceptibility observed among Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria suggests that H. manopappoides essential oil is not strongly selective toward a specific bacterial group, despite the structural differences between their cell envelopes. Similar non-selective antimicrobial patterns have been reported for complex essential oils, where the combined presence of monoterpenes and sesquiterpenes can overcome, at least partially, the permeability barrier associated with the outer membrane of Gram-negative bacteria [47]. Instead, the pronounced activity against C. albicans is also in agreement with previous reports describing antifungal properties for Helichrysum essential oils and related sesquiterpene-rich mixtures [45].
But the evaluation of individual sample constituents revealed distinct antimicrobial profiles, with eucalyptol and α-humulene showing higher activity against E. coli than against S. aureus, while β-caryophyllene was inactive within the tested concentration range. This differential susceptibility is in line with literature data indicating that α-humulene may exert a stronger antimicrobial effect against Gram-negative bacteria, including intestinal pathogens, compared with Gram-positive species [39]. α-Humulene has been described as a bioactive sesquiterpene with antibacterial properties, supporting its relevance as an antimicrobial constituent within essential oils [48].
β-Caryophyllene, despite being the most abundant component of the essential oil, showed limited antimicrobial activity when tested alone. This observation is consistent with previous reports indicating that β-caryophyllene often displays weak or strain-dependent MIC values, while contributing more effectively to antimicrobial activity when present within complex mixtures [47,49]. Such findings support the hypothesis that β-caryophyllene may play a modulatory role, enhancing or stabilizing the activity of other bioactive constituents rather than acting as a potent antimicrobial agent per se.
From a biological perspective, the observed activity profile suggests that membrane interaction represents a primary determinant of antimicrobial efficacy, particularly for sesquiterpene-rich fractions. The higher susceptibility of E. coli compared with S. aureus to α-humulene may reflect differences in membrane lipid composition and permeability. Moreover, the discrepancy between compound abundance and individual activity reinforces the concept that the antimicrobial effect of the essential oil cannot be predicted solely based on quantitative composition, but rather on functional interactions among constituents.

2.3. Mechanistic Evaluation of H. manopappoides Essential Oil and of Its Major Compounds Against Bacterial Target

To gain insight into the mechanism underlying the antimicrobial activity of H. manopappoides essential oil and of its main constituents, their effects on bacterial membrane integrity were investigated using complementary approaches. In E. coli, the NPN uptake assay revealed a pronounced alteration of the outer membrane upon treatment with the essential oil at its MIC (Figure 4).
Among all treatments, α-humulene induced the most pronounced increase in NPN fluorescence, reaching markedly higher intensity values compared with the essential oil and the other constituents throughout the time course. This result indicates a strong ability of α-humulene to permeabilize the outer membrane of E. coli, in line with its higher antimicrobial efficacy against this strain observed in MIC. In contrast, treatment with H. manopappoides essential oil resulted in a moderate but consistent increase in fluorescence, suggesting a measurable alteration of the outer membrane, although less intense than that induced by α-humulene alone. Eucalyptol produced a comparable or slightly lower fluorescence increase than the essential oil, indicating a limited but detectable effect on outer membrane permeability. Conversely, β-caryophyllene caused only minimal changes in NPN fluorescence, with values remaining close to the baseline over time, suggesting a weak interaction with the outer membrane under the tested conditions, trends similar to those obtained by Li et al. [50].
To observe if alterations in outer membrane permeability were translated into actual cell damage, time-dependent bacterial lysis assays were subsequently performed. As shown in Figure 5, H. manopappoides essential oil induced a significant and progressive increase in bacterial lysis in both E. coli (panel A) and S. aureus (panel B) compared to the negative control (DMSO).
Notably, the lytic effect of the essential oil appeared to develop more rapidly in the Gram-positive strain S. aureus, where a marked increase in lysis was already evident at earlier time points (10 min), whereas in E. coli, the effect became more pronounced at longer incubation times. This difference suggests a faster interaction of the essential oil with the more accessible cytoplasmic membrane of Gram-positive bacteria. Among the individual constituents, α-humulene displayed a distinct kinetic profile, promoting a more rapid and pronounced lysis in E. coli than in S. aureus, in agreement with its higher antimicrobial activity against the Gram-negative strain observed in MIC assays. Eucalyptol induced a moderate increase in bacterial lysis in both strains, with a generally weaker effect compared to the essential oil and α-humulene. In contrast, β-caryophyllene showed little or no lytic activity throughout the time course in either E. coli or S. aureus, with values remaining close to those of the negative control. Overall, these results indicate that bacterial lysis is strongly dependent on both the chemical nature of the treatment and the bacterial species, and further support membrane disruption as a key event underlying the antimicrobial activity of H. manopappoides essential oil, consistent with the membrane-targeting mechanism widely reported for essential oils [51].
These findings indicate that outer membrane permeabilization and subsequent cytoplasmic membrane disruption occur in a coordinated manner, leading to progressive loss of cellular integrity. The faster lytic response observed in S. aureus compared to E. coli is consistent with the absence of an outer membrane barrier in Gram-positive bacteria, allowing more immediate access of lipophilic compounds to the cytoplasmic membrane. Overall, the data support a primarily membrane-targeted mechanism rather than intracellular-specific targets.
Fluorescence microscopy analyses (Figure 6) provided clear confirmation of these effects. Untreated cells of both E. coli and S. aureus (Panels 1, A-1 and Panel 2, A-1) exhibited predominantly blue DAPI staining, consistent with intact membranes and preserved cellular integrity. In contrast, treatment with H. manopappoides essential oil resulted in a marked increase in propidium iodide (PI) uptake in both bacterial species (B-2), as evidenced by intense red fluorescence, indicating extensive membrane permeabilization and loss of membrane integrity [52].
Distinct staining patterns were observed for the individual constituents, in agreement with the results of the NPN and lysis assays. Eucalyptol-treated E. coli cells (Panel 1, C-3) showed limited PI uptake, while S. aureus cells (Panel 2, C-3) remained largely DAPI-positive, suggesting a relatively mild membrane effect. In contrast, α-humulene treatment induced pronounced PI staining in E. coli (Panel 1, D-4), consistent with severe membrane damage and the rapid lytic response observed in this strain, whereas S. aureus cells (Panel 2, D-4) appeared mostly blue, reflecting a weaker effect. Finally, β-caryophyllene-treated cells (E-5) exhibited predominantly blue staining in both strains, with only sporadic PI-positive E. coli cells, further confirming its limited impact on membrane integrity.
Taken together, the concordant evidence from outer membrane permeabilization, bacterial lysis kinetics, and fluorescence microscopy demonstrates that membrane disruption represents a central event in the antimicrobial action of H. manopappoides essential oil. Based on these mechanistic findings, the antimicrobial activity observed at the MIC level can be interpreted considering specific interactions between essential oil constituents and bacterial membranes. The more pronounced membrane-targeting effects of the essential oil compared with the isolated compounds support the involvement of possible favorable interactions within the phyto-complex [53]. In this context, the stronger activity of α-humulene against E. coli relative to S. aureus is consistent with literature reports describing a preferential action of this sesquiterpene toward Gram-negative and gut-associated bacteria, through interference with membrane-associated and biofilm-related processes [39,48]. This behavior provides a mechanistic explanation for the lower MIC values and the more pronounced membrane damage observed in E. coli.
Although β-caryophyllene was the most abundant essential oil constituent, its weak activity as a single compound suggests an indirect role. Previous studies have shown that β-caryophyllene can modulate membrane permeability and potentiate the activity of other antimicrobials despite limited intrinsic antibacterial potency [47,49]. Accordingly, within the essential oil matrix, β-caryophyllene may function as a membrane-modulating component that enhances the overall antimicrobial efficacy of the phyto-complex.
Eucalyptol also contributed to membrane perturbation, particularly in E. coli, in line with its reported ability to interact with lipid bilayers and weaken bacterial envelopes. Overall, these results indicate that the antimicrobial efficacy of H. manopappoides essential oil is primarily linked to its capacity to compromise bacterial membrane integrity through the combined and complementary actions of its major constituents, thereby supporting the relevance of the whole phyto-complex rather than individual components alone.
The concordance among MIC data, permeability assays, lysis kinetics, and fluorescence microscopy strengthens the causal link between membrane destabilization and antimicrobial outcome. This mechanistic coherence increases the biological relevance of the findings and supports the interpretation that the whole essential oil exerts a more balanced and sustained membrane-disrupting effect compared with isolated constituents.

2.4. Antibiofilm Activity of H. manopappoides Essential Oil

After characterizing the antimicrobial activity and membrane-targeting effects of H. manopappoides essential oil, its ability to interfere with biofilm formation was further investigated. The antibiofilm assay was performed on Mycobacterium smegmatis, an established model organism for studying biofilm development and maturation, widely used to evaluate compounds capable of influencing structured microbial communities and persistence [54]. To specifically assess antibiofilm activity independent of growth inhibition, the MIC was first calculated at 15 mg/mL, and sub-MICs of H. manopappoides essential oil ranging from 0 to 1 mg/mL were subsequently tested.
As shown in Figure 7, the essential oil showed a clear dose-dependent inhibition of biofilm formation compared to the untreated control (CTRL+). At the lowest concentration tested (0.25 mg/mL), a marked reduction in biofilm biomass was already observed, indicating early interference with biofilm development. Increasing the essential oil concentration to 0.5 and 1 mg/mL resulted in a further reduction in biofilm formation, reaching approximately 80–85% inhibition at 1 mg/mL, comparable to the effect observed in the antibiotic-treated control (CTRL−).
In particular, the strong antibiofilm effect observed at concentrations well below the MIC highlights the ability of H. manopappoides essential oil to impair biofilm formation without exerting a bactericidal effect. This suggests that essential oil primarily interferes with the early stages of biofilm stabilization and matrix development, processes crucial for bacterial adhesion, maturation, and long-term persistence [55]. This activity is particularly relevant in the context of chronic and device-associated infections, where biofilm formation plays a key role in antimicrobial tolerance and treatment failure [56].
Alterations in membrane integrity are known to affect cell adhesion, quorum sensing, and the production of extracellular polymeric substances, which are critical for biofilm initiation and maturation [57]. In this context, the strong inhibition observed at sub-MICs suggests that the essential oil can modulate biofilm-related pathways independently of direct bactericidal effects.
In addition, α-humulene, identified as one of the most active constituents of H. manopappoides essential oil, has been reported to possess antibiofilm properties, particularly against Gram-negative and gut-associated bacteria. Previous studies have shown that α-humulene can interfere with biofilm formation and maturation by affecting membrane-associated processes and regulatory pathways involved in microbial aggregation and persistence [39,48]. This evidence supports a possible contribution of α-humulene to the antibiofilm activity observed for the essential oil, even at concentrations that do not inhibit planktonic growth.
The inhibition of biofilm formation at sub-MICs further suggests that membrane perturbation may interfere with early adhesion processes and surface-associated signaling events. Since biofilm development is tightly linked to membrane-associated regulatory pathways, the ability of the essential oil to modulate these processes without affecting planktonic growth highlights a specific anti-virulence potential rather than a purely bactericidal effect.

2.5. Antioxidant Properties of H. manopappoides Essential Oil and Its Main Components

It is well established that essential oils, in addition to exhibiting antimicrobial properties, may also display relevant antioxidant activity [58]. In this context, the antioxidant potential of H. manopappoides essential oil and its major constituents, eucalyptol, α-humulene, and β-caryophyllene, was evaluated using two complementary assays: the DPPH radical scavenging assay and the hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) scavenging assay (Figure 8).
As shown in Figure 8A, all samples exhibited a clear, concentration-dependent increase in DPPH radical scavenging activity. The individual constituents showed markedly stronger antioxidant effects than the whole essential oil across the tested concentration range. Eucalyptol, α-humulene, and β-caryophyllene reached high levels of radical scavenging at relatively low concentrations (10 mg/mL), whereas H. manopappoides essential oil displayed a weaker response. A similar trend was observed in the H2O2 scavenging assay (Figure 8B). All samples were able to neutralize hydrogen peroxide in a dose-dependent manner, with α-humulene and β-caryophyllene showing the most pronounced scavenging activity, followed closely by eucalyptol. In contrast, the essential oil again exhibited lower overall efficacy compared to its individual constituents, although a progressive increase in activity was evident with increasing concentration.
To allow a quantitative comparison of antioxidant potency, IC50 values were calculated and are reported in Table 4.
The results confirm the trends observed in Figure 8. H. manopappoides essential oil showed the highest IC50 values in both assays (60 mg/mL for DPPH and 30 mg/mL for H2O2), indicating lower antioxidant potency. In contrast, the individual constituents displayed significantly lower IC50 values, ranging from 4 to 5.2 mg/mL in the DPPH assay and from 4 to 5.1 mg/mL in the H2O2 assay, highlighting their stronger radical scavenging capacity. Ascorbic acid consistently exhibited the lowest IC50 values, confirming its high antioxidant efficacy [59]. The reduced activity of the essential oil compared to its components suggests that interactions within the phytocomplex may modulate the overall antioxidant response [60].

2.6. Evaluation of Cytotoxic Effects on CaCo-2 Cells

To evaluate the potential cytotoxicity associated with H. manopappoides essential oil and its major constituents on eukaryotic cells, experiments have been carried out on human CaCo-2 intestinal epithelial cells, and cell viability was assessed 24 h after transfection using MTT assay. Cells were treated for 24 h with the highest concentrations corresponding to the MIC values previously determined for each compound, and cell viability was expressed as a percentage relative to untreated control cells (CTRL) as shown in Figure 9.
Treatment with H. manopappoides essential oil resulted in a marked reduction in cell viability, which dropped to approximately 20–25% compared to the control, indicating a strong cytotoxic effect at the tested concentration. In contrast, treatment with the individual essential oil constituents led to markedly less severe, yet significant, reductions in cell viability.
Specifically, eucalyptol induced a moderate reduction in cell viability, with values around 65–70%, indicating a partial cytotoxic effect. Similarly, α-humulene reduced cell viability to approximately 55–60%, showing a slightly more pronounced effect compared to eucalyptol. β-Caryophyllene also caused a mild decrease in cell viability, with values around 60–65% relative to the control. These data indicate that, although each major constituent of H. manopappoides essential oil exhibits cytotoxic activity when tested individually, none of them reproduces the strong cytotoxic effect observed with the whole essential oil at equivalent MIC-based concentrations [61].
Overall, these results demonstrate a differential cytotoxicity of the H. manopappoides sample and its major constituents on CaCo-2 cells after 24 h of exposure. Notably, the whole oil exerted a substantially greater cytotoxic effect than any of the individual compounds tested at their respective MICs, suggesting that the combined presence of multiple constituents may enhance cytotoxicity compared to single components.

2.7. Effect on Intracellular ROS Production

To further investigate whether the cytotoxic effects observed in CaCo-2 cells were associated with oxidative stress, intracellular reactive oxygen species (ROS) production was evaluated using the CellROX™ fluorescent probe. CaCo-2 cells were treated for 24 h with H. manopappoides essential oil and its principal constituents at the highest concentrations corresponding to their respective MIC values, and ROS levels were expressed as relative fluorescence intensity (Figure 10).
Treatment with H. manopappoides oil induced a marked increase in intracellular ROS levels compared to untreated control cells, indicating the induction of pronounced oxidative stress. This result is consistent with the strong reduction in cell viability observed in the MTT assay and suggests that the cytotoxicity of the essential oil might be mediated, at least partially, by a ROS-dependent mechanism. In contrast, CaCo-2 cells treated with eucalyptol, α-humulene, or β-caryophyllene did not show a significant increase in ROS production relative to the control, with fluorescence values remaining close to baseline levels. These findings indicate that, at the biologically active concentrations tested, the individual constituents do not induce oxidative stress in CaCo-2 cells. The selective induction of ROS by the whole essential oil further supports a differential biological activity between the complete phytocomplex and its isolated components.

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. Plant Materials

The leaves of Helichrysum manopappoides Humbert were collected by hand from plants growing at Tsaratanàna-Vinaninkarena (19°56′28.3″ S, 47°03′27.8″ E), District of Antsirabe II in the Region of Vakinankaratra, in early February 2025. The plant identification was carried out at the Ethnobotany and Botany Department of the National Center of Pharmaceutical Research (CNARP) in Antananarivo, Madagascar. Voucher specimens have been deposited at the CNARP under the code RHJ 212. The plant material was transported to the laboratory on the same day as the collection to submit immediately to the extraction to avoid an eventual loss of its essential oil content.

3.2. Extraction of Essential Oil

After cutting into small pieces with a knife, the freshly collected leaves (400 g) were subjected to a steam distillation extraction to produce the essential oil, using an appropriate apparatus and water as a source of steam. The plant material was introduced in the upper flask, whereas 1.2 L of distilled water was added to the lower one. The treatment of the plant material lasted 2 h. The essential oil and the condensed water were not miscible, giving two well-separated phases in the separatory funnel of the apparatus. The upper layer was made up of the essential oil, which was collected in a sealed amber vial. The oil was obtained with a yield of 0.14% (w/w). The obtained essential oil was dried with Na2SO4, stored in an appropriate vial under N2, and placed in the freezer at −20 °C until the time of analysis.

3.3. GC and GC-MS Analyses

GC-MS analysis was performed using a Shimadzu QP 2010. GC-MS analysis was performed using a Shimadzu QP 2010, plus equipped with an AOC-20i autoinjector (Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan) gas chromatograph equipped with a capillary column (DB-5 MS) of 30 m × 0.25 mm i.d., film thickness 0.25 μm, and a data processor. The oven program was as follows: temperature was held at 40 °C for 5 min, then increased at a rate of 2 °C/min up to 260 °C, then isothermal for 20 min. Helium was used as the carrier gas (1 mL min−1). The injector and detector temperatures were set at 250 and 290 °C, respectively. One μL of essential oil solution (3% essential oil/hexane v/v) was injected in split mode 1:50; MS range 40–600. The settings were as follows: ionization voltage, 70 eV; electron multiplier energy, 2000 V; transfer line temperature, 295 °C; solvent delay, 3 min (Figure S1).
Linear retention indices (LRIs) were calculated on DB-5 MS retention indices using a mixture of pure n-alkanes (C7–C30) (Figure S2), and all the peaks’ compounds were identified by comparison with MS and by comparison of their relative linear retention indices with WILEY275, NIST 17, ADAMS, and FFNSC2 libraries. The analyses were performed in triplicate, and the results are expressed as the average of three measurements ± standard deviation.

3.4. NMR Experiments

1H- and 13C-NMR spectra were recorded at 400/100 MHz in CDCl3 on Bruker spectrometers using the residual solvent signal (δ = 7.27 in 1H and δ = 77.00 in 13C for CDCl3) as a reference. HMBC experiment was performed using Bruker microprograms. Deuterated chloroform (CDCl3), n-alkanes (C8–C40), eucalyptol, α-humulene, β-caryophyllene, and hexane were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (San Louis, MO, USA).

3.5. Bacterial Strain

The antimicrobial activity of the essential oil of H. manopappoides, eucalyptol, α-humulene, and β-caryophyllene was evaluated against different Gram-negative strains, such as Escherichia coli DH5α, Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1 ATCC15692, Shigella sonnei ATCC25931, and Salmonella Typhimurium ATCC14028, and Gram-positive strains, such as Staphylococcus aureus ATCC6538P, Listeria monocytogenes ATCC19115 and Mycobacterium smegmatis MC2155 and the yeast Candida albicans ATCC14053. E. coli and S. aureus were used as model strains.

3.6. Determination of Minimum Inhibitory Concentrations (MIC)

The antimicrobial activity of H. manopappoides essential oil, eucalyptol, α-humulene, and β-caryophyllene was evaluated by determining the Minimum Inhibitory Concentrations (MICs) against selected bacterial strains using the broth microdilution method, according to CLSI guidelines [62] and according to the procedure reported in Porrello et al. [63].

3.7. N-Phenyl Naphthylamine (NPN) Assay

The outer membrane (OM) permeabilizing activity of H. manopappoides essential oil, eucalyptol, α-humulene, and β-caryophyllene was evaluated using the 1-N-phenylnaphthylamine (NPN) uptake assay, adapted from Jia et al. [64] with slight modifications; Porrello et al. [63].

3.8. Bacterial Lysis Assay

Bacterial lysis activity was evaluated according to a previously described method, with slight modifications [65]. E. coli and S. aureus were used as representative Gram-negative and Gram-positive strains, respectively.
Overnight cultures were diluted to an OD600 of 0.1 (5 mL) and incubated at 37 °C with shaking until an OD600 of ~1.0 was reached. Cells were harvested by centrifugation (5000× g, 5 min), resuspended in PBS (pH 7.4), and adjusted to an OD600 of 0.5.
Untreated cells served as controls (Ctrl); DMSO (50% v/v) and SDS (1% w/v) were used as negative (Ctrl−) and positive (Ctrl+) controls, respectively. Experimental samples were treated with the tested compounds at MICs previously determined for each strain. Blanks containing PBS and the tested compound were included.
Samples were incubated at 37 °C with shaking, and OD600 was measured after 10, 30, and 60 min using a microplate reader. Bacterial lysis was expressed as a percentage according to the following equation:
Bacterial lysis   ( % ) = 100 % OD sample OD Ctrl 100

3.9. Fluorescence-Based Viability Assay Using DAPI and PI

Bacterial inner membrane (IM) integrity was examined by fluorescence microscopy using DAPI (4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole dihydrochloride) and propidium iodide (PI) as dual-staining probes, based on Di Girolamo et al. [66] and Porrello et al. [63].

3.10. Inhibition of Biofilm Development Assays

The antibiofilm effect of H. manopappoides essential oil was investigated against Mycobacterium smegmatis using a crystal violet (CV) staining assay adapted from Di Napoli et al. [67].

3.11. DPPH and H2O2 Scavenging Capacity Assay

The antioxidant capacity of H. manopappoides essential oil and its individual components was evaluated through two complementary assays: DPPH radical scavenging and hydrogen peroxide scavenging, following the methodology described by Napolitano et al. [68].

3.12. Eukaryotic Cell Culture

Human colorectal adenocarcinoma (Caco-2) cells were cultured as reported in Porrello et al. [63].

3.13. Cell Viability Assay

Caco-2 cells were splated in 96-well plates (30,000 cells/well) and allowed to adhere for 24 h. Cells were then treated for 24 h with Helichrysum manopappoides sample, eucalyptol, α-caryophyllene, or β-caryophyllene at the concentrations of the corresponding MIC values. Cell viability was subsequently assessed using a standard MTT assay as reported in Porrello et al. [63].

3.14. Measurement of Oxidative Stress

For the evaluation of intracellular oxidative stress, 3000 Caco-2 cells were seeded in 96-well plates and treated 24 h after seeding with Helichrysum manopappoides oil, eucalyptol, α-caryophyllene, and β-caryophyllene for 24 h at the indicated concentrations. Oxidative stress levels were analyzed as reported in Porrello et al. [63].

3.15. Statistical Analysis

Statistical analysis was performed using a two-tailed paired Student’s t-test, suitable for comparing related sample groups. The analysis was conducted in Microsoft Excel (Microsoft Office 365), and results were considered statistically significant when p-values were less than or the same as 0.05. Data are expressed as mean ± standard deviation (SD) from at least three independent experiments.

4. Conclusions

This study provides the first comprehensive chemical and biological characterization of the essential oil obtained from steam distillation of the leaves of Helichrysum manopappoides Humbert, an endemic Malagasy species. GC–MS and NMR analyses revealed a sesquiterpene-rich essential oil composition, dominated by β-caryophyllene (19.78%), α-humulene (14.75%), and eucalyptol (7.38%), compounds commonly presented in Helichrysum essential oils. This study confirms how spectroscopic and spectrometric analyses, in combination, can ensure the correct identification of complex samples such as essential oils, and, in the future, it would be desirable to understand whether these compounds are markers of leaves only or are present in all parts of the plant. Thanks to its antimicrobial and antibiofilm properties, combined with the in vitro free radical scavenging capacity attributable to its individual constituents, H. manopappoides essential oil represents a novel source of bioactive compounds for the management or prevention of intestinal infections. The results obtained during this study may induce further pharmacological research on the oil from H. manopappoides and constitute a starting point for its applicative valorization. In addition, they should help to reinforce the conservation of the Malagasy biodiversity in general, and the Helichrysum species in particular, by taking into account their importance in local traditional medicine.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/plants15050672/s1. Figure S1. GC-MS chromatograms (A, B, and C) of Helichrysum manopappoides Humbert essential oil; Figure S2. GC-MS chromatogram of pure n-alkanes (C7–C30).

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, N.B. and M.V.; methodology, G.C., A.S., M.V., D.D.G., N.B., M.V. and H.J.B.R.; software, G.C., N.B. and M.V.; validation, S.R.R., G.C., A.S., N.B. and M.V.; formal analysis, N.B., M.V. and A.Z.; investigation, S.R.R., G.C., N.B. and M.V.; resources, N.B. and M.B.; data curation, A.Z., N.B. and M.V.; writing—original draft preparation: S.R.R., V.E.R., G.C., A.S., N.B., A.Z. and M.V.; writing—review and editing, V.E.R., A.Z., M.B. and N.B.; visualization, V.E.R., A.Z. and M.B. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was supported by a grant from the PNRR Spoke 6 Activity 2: “Bioprospecting and bioactivity, Task 2.2: Sustainability of extraction processes from biological matrices and scalability”, National Biodiversity Future Center–NBFC (Cod. ID. CN00000033, CUP B73C22000790001 of the University of Palermo). This work was supported by a grant from “Progetto Finanziato da Next Generation EU PNRR—Missione 4 “Istruzione e Ricerca”—Componente C2-investimento 1.1 (PNRR M4.C2.1.1), Fondo per il Programma Nazionale di Ricerca e Progetti di Rilevante Interesse Nazionale (PRIN)—codice P2022CKMPW_002—CUP B53D23025620001”.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in this study are included in the article. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

The authors are thankful to the Government of Madagascar (Ministry of Environment and Sustainable Development) for providing the authorization permits needed for this research, no. 019/25/MEDD/SG/DGGE/DAPRNE/SCBE/.Re. Vincent E. Rasamison is grateful to Dr. Antsonantenainarivony O. and Prof. Rasoloariniaina J.R. (University of Vakinankaratra) for their administrative support.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. POWO, Plants of the World Online. Available online: https://powo.science.kew.org/taxon/urn:lsid:ipni.org:names:331648-2 (accessed on 24 November 2025).
  2. Galbany-Casals, M.; Unwin, M.; Garcia-Jacas, N.; Smissen, R.D.; Susanna, A.; Bayer, R.J. Phylogenetic relationships in Helichrysum (Compositae: Gnaphalieae) and related genera: Incongruence between nuclear and plastid phylogenies, biogeographic and morphological patterns, and implications for generic delimitation. Taxonomy 2014, 63, 608–624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Glumac, M.; Jažo, Z.; Paštar, V.; Golemac, A.; Čikeš Čulić, V.; Bektić, S.; Radan, M.; Carev, I. Chemical Profiling and Bioactivity Assessment of Helichrysum italicum (Roth) G. Don. Essential oil: Exploring Pure Compounds and Synergistic Combinations. Molecules 2023, 28, 5299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Rafidison, V.; Ratsimandresy, F.; Rakotondrafara, A.; Rakotondrajaona, R.; Rasamison, V.E.; Rakotoarisoa, F.M.; Rakotonandrasana, S.R. Synthèse et analyse de données sur les inventaires de plantes médicinales de Madagascar. Ethnobot. Res. Appl. 2019, 18, 1–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Jakupović, L.; Bačić, I.; Jablan, J.; Marguí, E.; Marijan, M.; Inić, S.; Nižić Nodilo, L.; Hafner, A.; Zovko Končić, M. Hydroxypropyl-β-Cyclodextrin-Based Helichrysum italicum Extracts: Antioxidant and Cosmeceutical Activity and Biocompatibility. Antioxidants 2023, 12, 855. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Šovljanski, O.; Aćimović, M.; Tomić, A.; Lončar, B.; Miljković, A.; Čabarkapa, I.; Pezo, L. Antibacterial and Antifungal Potential of Helichrysum italicum (Roth) G. Don Essential oil. Antibiotics 2024, 13, 722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Adeosun, W.B.; Bodede, O.; Prinsloo, G. Effect of Different Climatic Regions and Seasonal Variation on the Antibacterial and Antifungal Activity, and Chemical Profile of Helichrysum aureonitens Sch. Bip. Metabolites 2022, 12, 758. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Lourens, A.C.U.; Van Vuuren, S.F.; Viljoen, A.M.; Davids, H.; Van Heerden, F.R. Antimicrobial activity and in vitro cytotoxicity of selected South African Helichrysum species. S. Afr. J. Bot. 2011, 77, 229–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Sagbo, I.J.; Otang-Mbeng, W. Anti-proliferative and genotoxic activities of the Helichrysum petiolare Hilliard & B.L. Burtt. Sci. Pharm. 2020, 88, 49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Maroyi, A. Helichrysum cymosum (L.) D. Don (asteraceae): Medicinal uses, chemistry, and biological activities. Asian J. Pharm. Clin. Res. 2019, 12, 19–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Matanzima, Y.; Nchu, F.; Laubscher, C.P. Quantitative and Qualitative Optimization of Antimicrobial Bioactive Constituents of Helichrysum cymosum Using Hydroponics Technology. Master’s Dissertation, Cape Peninsula University of Technology, Cape Town, South Africa, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  12. Nkemzi, A.Q.; Okaiyeto, K.; Kerebba, N.; Rautenbach, F.; Oyenihi, O.; Ekpo, O.E.; Oguntibeju, O.O. In vitro hypoglycemic, antioxidant, anti-inflammatory activities and phytochemical profiling of aqueous and ethanol extracts of Helichrysum cymosum. Phytomed. Plus 2024, 4, 639–657. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Judzentiene, A.; Budiene, J.; Nedveckyte, I.; Garjonyte, R. Antioxidant and Toxic Activity of Helichrysum arenarium (L.) Moench and Helichrysum italicum (Roth) G. Don Essential oils and Extracts. Molecules 2022, 27, 1311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. de Canha, M.N.; Komarnytsky, S.; Langhansova, L.; Lall, N. Exploring the anti-acne potential of Impepho [Helichrysum odoratissimum (L.) Sweet] to combat Cutibacterium acnes virulence. Front. Pharmacol. 2020, 10, 559–580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Matrose, N.A.; Obikeze, K.; Belay, Z.A.; Caleb, O.J. Impact of spatial variation and extraction solvents on bioactive compounds, secondary metabolites and antifungal efficacy of South African Impepho [Helichrysum odoratissimum (L.) Sweet]. Food Biosci. 2021, 42, 139–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Süntar, I.; Küpeli-Akkol, E.; Keles, H.; Yesilada, E.; Sarker, S.D. Exploration of the wound healing potential of Helichrysum graveolens (Bieb.) Sweet: Isolation of apigenin as an active component. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2013, 149, 103–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Rigano, D.; Formisano, C.; Senatore, F.; Piacente, S.; Pagano, E.; Capasso, R.; Borrelli, F.; Izzo, A.A. Intestinal antispasmodic effects of Helichrysum italicum (Roth) Don ssp. italicum and chemical identification of the active ingredients. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2013, 150, 901–906. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Adeosun, W.B.; Loots, D.T. Medicinal plants against viral infections: A review of metabolomics evidence for the antiviral properties and potentials in plant sources. Viruses 2024, 16, 218–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Melito, S.; Petretto, G.L.; Podani, J.; Foddai, M.; Maldini, M.; Chessa, M.; Pintore, G. Altitude and climate influence Helichrysum italicum subsp. microphyllum essential oils composition. Ind. Crops Prod. 2016, 80, 242–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Tundis, R.; Statti, G.A.; Conforti, F.; Bianchi, A.; Agrimonti, C.; Sacchetti, G.; Muzzoli, M.; Ballero, M.; Menichini, F.; Poli, F. Influence of environmental factors on composition of volatile constituents and biological activity of Helichrysum italicum (Roth) Don (Asteraceae). Nat. Prod. Res. 2005, 19, 379–387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Matin, A.; Pavkov, I.; Grubor, M.; Jurisic, V.; Kontek, M.; Jukic, F.; Kricka, T. Influence of harvest time, method of preparation and method of distillation on the qualitative properties of organically grown and wild Helichrysum italicum immortelle essential oil. Separations 2021, 8, 167–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Adeosun, W.B.; More, G.K.; Steenkamp, P.; Prinsloo, G. Influence of seasonal and geographic variation on the anti-HSV-1 properties and chlorogenic acids content of Helichrysum aureonitens Sch. Bip. Front. Mol. Biosci. 2022, 9, 859–872. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Heyman, H.M.; Senejoux, F.; Seibert, I.; Klimkait, T.; Maharaj, V.J.; Meyer, J.J.M. Identification of anti-HIV active dicaffeoylquinic- and tricaffeoylquinic acids in Helichrysum populifolium by NMR-based metabolomic guided fractionation. Fitoterapia 2015, 103, 155–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Albayrak, S.; Aksoy, A.; Sagdic, O.; Hamzaoglu, E. Compositions, antioxidant and antimicrobial activities of Helichrysum (Asteraceae) species collected from Turkey. Food Chem. 2010, 119, 114–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Süzgeç, S.; Meriçli, A.H.; Houghton, P.J.; Çubukçu, B. Flavonoids of Helichrysum compactum and their antioxidant and antibacterial activity. Fitoterapia 2005, 76, 269–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Süzgeç-Selçuk, S.; Birteksöz, A.S. Flavonoids of Helichrysum chasmolycicum and its antioxidant and antimicrobial activities. S. Afr. J. Bot. 2011, 77, 170–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Simin, N.; Lesjak, M.; Zivanovic, N.; Bozanic Tanjga, B.; Orcic, D.; Ljubojevic, M. Morphological characters, phytochemical profile and biological activities of novel garden roses edible cultivars. Horticulturae 2023, 9, 1082–1105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Yazdi, S.; Heyman, H.; Prinsloo, G.; Klimkait, T.; Meyer, J.J.M. Identification of anti-HIV biomarkers of Helichrysum Species by NMR-based metabolomic analysis. Front. Pharmacol. 2022, 13, 231–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Giovanelli, S.; De Leo, M.; Cervelli, C.; Ruffoni, B.; Ciccarelli, D.; Pistelli, L. Essential oil composition and volatile profile of seven Helichrysum species grown in Italy. Chem. Biodivers. 2018, 15, 545–566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Leonardi, M.; Giovanelli, S.; Ambryszewska, K.E.; Ruffoni, B.; Cervelli, C.; Pistelli, L.; Flamini, G.; Pistelli, L. Essential oil composition of six Helichrysum species grown in Italy. Biochem. Syst. Ecol. 2018, 79, 15–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Najar, B.; Cervelli, C.; Ferri, B.; Cioni, P.L.; Pistelli, L. Essential oils and volatile emission of eight South African species of Helichrysum grown in uniform environmental conditions. S. Afr. J. Bot. 2019, 124, 178–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Zheljazkov, V.D.; Semerdjieva, I.; Yankova-Tsvetkova, E.; Astatkie, T.; Stanev, S.; Dincheva, I.; Kačániová, M. Chemical Profile and Antimicrobial Activity of the Essential oils of Helichrysum arenarium (L.) Moench. and Helichrysum italicum (Roth.) G. Don. Plants 2022, 11, 951. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Humbert, H. Flore de Madagascar et des Comores, 189e. Famille: Composées, Tome II; Museum National d’Histoire Naturelle: Paris, France, 1962. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Mukherjee, P.K. Anti-viral evaluation of herbal drugs. In Quality Control and Evaluation of Herbal Drugs; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2019; pp. 599–628. [Google Scholar]
  35. Franccedil, T.; Lambert, S.M.; Michel, J.D.P.; Gaby, N.M.E.; Fabrice, F.B.; Zaché, N.; Henri, A.Z.P.; Chantal, M. Composition, radical scavenging and anti-fungal activities of essential oils from 3 Helichrysum species growing in Cameroon against Penicillium oxalicum a yam rot fungi. Afr. J. Agric. Res. 2010, 5, 121–127. [Google Scholar]
  36. Sobhy, E.; El-Feky, S. Chemical constituents and antimicrobial activity of Helichrysum stoechas. Asian J. Plant Sci. 2007, 6, 692–695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Randriamiharisoa, R.; Gaydou, E.M.; Faure, R.; Bianchini, J.P. Carbon-13 NMR spectra of five sesquiterpenes isolated from Ylang Ylang essential oil. Magn. Reson. Chem. 1986, 24, 275–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Kashman, Y.; Groweiss, A. New diterpenoids from the soft corals Xenia macrospiculata and Xenia obscuronata. J. Org. Chem. 1980, 45, 3814–3824. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Jang, H.I.; Rhee, K.J.; Eom, Y.B. Antibacterial and antibiofilm effects of α-humulene against Bacteroides fragilis. Can. J. Microbiol. 2020, 66, 389–399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Kramberger, K.; Bezek Kranjc, K.; Jenko Pražnikar, Z.; Barlič-Maganja, D.; Kenig, S. Protective Capacity of Helichrysum italicum Infusion Against Intestinal Barrier Disruption and Translocation of Salmonella infantis. Pharmaceuticals 2024, 17, 1398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Cavalli, J.F.; Ranarivelo, L.; Ratsimbason, M.; Bernardini, A.F.; Casanova, J. Constituents of the essential oil of six Helichrysum species from Madagascar. Flav. Frag. J. 2001, 16, 253–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Baser, K.H.C.; Demirci, B.; Kirimer, N. Compositions of the essential oils of four Helichrysum species from Madagascar. J. Essent. Oil Res. 2022, 14, 53–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Ramanoelina, P.A.R.; Bianchini, J.P.; Gaydou, E.M. Chemical composition of essential oil of Helichrysum bracteiferum. J. Essent. Oil Res. 1992, 4, 531–532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Rabehaja, D.J.R.; Bezert, G.; Rakotonandrasana, S.R.; Ramanoelina, P.A.R.; Andrianjara, C.; Bighelli, A.; Tomi, F.; Paoli, M. Chemical composition of aerial parts essential oils from six endemic malagasy Helichrysum species. Plants 2020, 9, 265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Dahham, S.S.; Tabana, Y.M.; Iqbal, M.A.; Ahamed, M.B.; Ezzat, M.O.; Majid, A.S.; Majid, A.M. The Anticancer, Antioxidant and Antimicrobial Properties of the Sesquiterpene β-Caryophyllene from the Essential Oil of Aquilaria crassna. Molecules 2015, 20, 11808–11829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Móricz, Á.M.; Bartoszek, M.; Polak, J.; Marczewska, P.; Knaś, M.; Böszörményi, A.; Fodor, J.; Kowalska, T.; Sajewicz, M. A Comparison of Quantitative Composition and Bioactivity of Oils Derived from Seven North American Varieties of Hops (Humulus lupulus L.). Separations 2023, 10, 402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Selestino Neta, M.C.; Vittorazzi, C.; Guimarães, A.C.; Martins, J.D.; Fronza, M.; Endringer, D.C.; Scherer, R. Effects of β-caryophyllene and Murraya paniculata essential oil in the murine hepatoma cells and in the bacteria and fungi 24-h time-kill curve studies. Pharm. Biol. 2017, 55, 190–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Dalavaye, N.; Nicholas, M.; Pillai, M.; Erridge, S.; Sodergren, M.H. The Clinical Translation of α-humulene—A Scoping Review. Planta Med. 2024, 90, 664–674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Moo, C.L.; Yang, S.K.; Osman, M.A.; Yuswan, M.H.; Loh, J.Y.; Lim, W.M.; Lim, S.H.; Lai, K.S. Antibacterial Activity and Mode of Action of β-caryophyllene on Bacillus cereus. Pol. J. Microbiol. 2020, 69, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Li, B.; Duan, Q.; Shi, W.; Li, Y.; Wei, Y.; Si, S.; Wang, Y.; Wang, M.; Li, Y. Fluorescent probe-based detection of outer membrane damage of Gram-negative bacteria. SLAS Discov. 2025, 37, 100290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Burt, S. Essential oils: Their antibacterial properties and potential applications in foods—A review. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2004, 94, 223–253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Kim, Y.; Farrah, S.; Baney, R.H. Membrane damage of bacteria by silanols treatment. Elect. J. Biotechnol. 2007, 10, 252–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Hyldgaard, M.; Mygind, T.; Meyer, R.L. Essential oils in food preservation: Mode of action, synergies, and interactions with food matrix components. Front Microbiol. 2012, 3, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Yadav, P.; Goel, M.; Gupta, R.D. Anti-biofilm potential of human senescence marker protein 30 against Mycobacterium smegmatis. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2023, 40, 45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Nostro, A.; Roccaro, A.S.; Bisignano, G.; Marino, A.; Cannatelli, M.A.; Pizzimenti, F.C.; Cioni, P.L.; Procopio, F.; Blanco, A.R. Effects of oregano, carvacrol and thymol on Staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcus epidermidis biofilms. J. Med. Microbiol. 2007, 56, 519–523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Donlan, R.M.; Costerton, J.W. Biofilms: Survival mechanisms of clinically relevant microorganisms. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2002, 15, 167–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Touati, A.; Mairi, A.; Ibrahim, N.A.; Idres, T. Essential Oils for Biofilm Control: Mechanisms, Synergies, and Translational Challenges in the Era of Antimicrobial Resistance. Antibiotics 2025, 14, 503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Amorati, R.; Foti, M.C.; Valgimigli, L. Antioxidant activity of essential oils. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2013, 61, 10835–10847. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Gęgotek, A.; Skrzydlewska, E. Antioxidative and Anti-Inflammatory Activity of Ascorbic Acid. Antioxidants 2022, 11, 1993. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Buriani, A.; Fortinguerra, S.; Sorrenti, V.; Caudullo, G.; Carrara, M. Essential Oil Phytocomplex Activity, a Review with a Focus on Multivariate Analysis for a Network Pharmacology-Informed Phytogenomic Approach. Molecules 2020, 25, 1833. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Loizzo, M.R.; Tundis, R.; Menichini, F.; Saab, A.M.; Statti, G.A.; Menichini, F. Antiproliferative effects of essential oils and their major constituents in human renal adenocarcinoma and amelanotic melanoma cells. Cell Prolif. 2008, 41, 1002–1012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Di Napoli, M.; Castagliuolo, G.; Pio, S.; Di Nardo, I.; Russo, T.; Antonini, D.; Notomista, E.; Varcamonti, M.; Zanfardino, A. Study of the Antimicrobial Activity of the Human Peptide SQQ30 against Pathogenic Bacteria. Antibiotics 2024, 13, 145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Porrello, A.; Sordillo, A.; Badalamenti, N.; Castagliuolo, G.; Bazan, G.; Di Girolamo, D.; Varcamonti, M.; Zanfardino, A.; Bruno, M. Myristicin from Athamanta sicula L.: A Potential Natural Antimicrobial Agent. Antibiotics 2026, 15, 79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Jia, F.; Wang, J.; Zhang, L.; Zhou, J.; He, Y.; Lu, Y.; Liu, K.; Yan, W.; Wang, K. Multiple action mechanism and in vivo antimicrobial efficacy of antimicrobial peptide Jelleine-I. J. Pept. Sci. 2021, 27, e3294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Dedieu, L.; Brunel, J.M.; Lorenzi, V.; Muselli, A.; Berti, L.; Bolla, J.M. Antibacterial Mode of Action of the Daucus carota Essential Oil Active Compounds against Campylobacter jejuni and Efflux-Mediated Drug Resistance in Gram-Negative Bacteria. Molecules 2020, 25, 5448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Di Girolamo, D.; Badalamenti, N.; Castagliuolo, G.; Ilardi, V.; Varcamonti, M.; Bruno, M.; Zanfardino, A. South Tyrol (Italy) Pastinaca sativa L. subsp. sativa Essential Oil: GC-MS Composition, Antimicrobial, Anti-Biofilm, and Antioxidant Properties. Molecules 2025, 30, 3033. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Di Napoli, M.; Badalamenti, N.; Castagliuolo, G.; Merra, R.; Varcamonti, M.; Zanfardino, A.; Bruno, M.; Sottile, F. Chemical composition, antimicrobial, and antioxidant activities of Opuntia stricta (Haw.) Haw. mucilage collected in Sicily, Italy. Nat. Prod. Res. 2024, 38, 4077–4085. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Napolitano, A.; Di Napoli, M.; Castagliuolo, G.; Badalamenti, N.; Cicio, A.; Bruno, M.; Piacente, S.; Maresca, V.; Cianciullo, P.; Capasso, L.; et al. The chemical composition of the aerial parts of Stachys spreitzenhoferi (Lamiaceae) growing in Kythira Island (Greece), and their antioxidant, antimicrobial, and antiproliferative properties. Phytochemistry 2022, 203, 113373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Helichrysum manopappoides Humbert plants collected in Madagascar. Photo by Ramaminirina Henintsoa J.B.
Figure 1. Helichrysum manopappoides Humbert plants collected in Madagascar. Photo by Ramaminirina Henintsoa J.B.
Plants 15 00672 g001
Figure 2. Chemical structure of β-caryophyllene and α-humulene.
Figure 2. Chemical structure of β-caryophyllene and α-humulene.
Plants 15 00672 g002
Figure 3. HMBC spectrum of Helichrysum manopappoides Humbert essential oil.
Figure 3. HMBC spectrum of Helichrysum manopappoides Humbert essential oil.
Plants 15 00672 g003
Figure 4. Outer Membrane Damage Assessed by NPN Assay. NPN fluorescence was used to evaluate outer membrane permeability in E. coli after treatment with MICs of H. manopappoides essential oil, eucalyptol, α-humulene, and β-caryophyllene. Data represent the means of three independent experiments.
Figure 4. Outer Membrane Damage Assessed by NPN Assay. NPN fluorescence was used to evaluate outer membrane permeability in E. coli after treatment with MICs of H. manopappoides essential oil, eucalyptol, α-humulene, and β-caryophyllene. Data represent the means of three independent experiments.
Plants 15 00672 g004
Figure 5. Bacterial lysis activity of H. manopappoides essential oil, eucalyptol, α-humulene, and β-caryophyllene. Panel (A) against E. coli and panel (B) against S. aureus. H. manopappoides essential oil, eucalyptol, α-humulene, and β-caryophyllene were tested at their respective MICs. DMSO served as a negative control, while SDS served as a positive control. Bacterial lysis was expressed as a percentage and evaluated over time (10, 30, and 60 min). Data represent the means of three independent experiments. Statistical analysis was performed against the control using a two-tailed paired t-test. ns: not significant; * p ≤ 0.05; ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001.
Figure 5. Bacterial lysis activity of H. manopappoides essential oil, eucalyptol, α-humulene, and β-caryophyllene. Panel (A) against E. coli and panel (B) against S. aureus. H. manopappoides essential oil, eucalyptol, α-humulene, and β-caryophyllene were tested at their respective MICs. DMSO served as a negative control, while SDS served as a positive control. Bacterial lysis was expressed as a percentage and evaluated over time (10, 30, and 60 min). Data represent the means of three independent experiments. Statistical analysis was performed against the control using a two-tailed paired t-test. ns: not significant; * p ≤ 0.05; ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001.
Plants 15 00672 g005
Figure 6. Fluorescence microscopy of E. coli (panel (1)) and S. aureus (panel (2)) cells after 1 h of treatment with H. manopappoides essential oil (B-2), eucalyptol (C-3), α-humulene (D-4), and β-caryophyllene (E-5) stained with DAPI (blue) and propidium iodide (red). Untreated control cells are shown in (A-1). Scale bars: 5 µm.
Figure 6. Fluorescence microscopy of E. coli (panel (1)) and S. aureus (panel (2)) cells after 1 h of treatment with H. manopappoides essential oil (B-2), eucalyptol (C-3), α-humulene (D-4), and β-caryophyllene (E-5) stained with DAPI (blue) and propidium iodide (red). Untreated control cells are shown in (A-1). Scale bars: 5 µm.
Plants 15 00672 g006
Figure 7. Inhibition of biofilm formation by H. manopappoides essential oil on M. smegmatis. Biofilm biomass was quantified after treatment with sub-MICs (0–1 mg/mL) of essential oils. CTRL+ cells were untreated; CTRL− cells were treated with kanamycin. Data represent the average of three independent experiments.
Figure 7. Inhibition of biofilm formation by H. manopappoides essential oil on M. smegmatis. Biofilm biomass was quantified after treatment with sub-MICs (0–1 mg/mL) of essential oils. CTRL+ cells were untreated; CTRL− cells were treated with kanamycin. Data represent the average of three independent experiments.
Plants 15 00672 g007
Figure 8. Antioxidant activity of H. manopappoides essential oil, eucalyptol, α-humulene, and β-caryophyllene. Panel (A) DPPH assay; Panel (B) H2O2 scavenging assay. H. manopappoides essential oil, eucalyptol, α-humulene, and β-caryophyllene were tested at concentrations ranging from 0 to 25 mg/mL. Data represent the average of three independent experiments. Statistical analysis was performed relative to the standard by a two-tailed paired t-test. p-value (* p ≤ 0.05; ** p < 0.01).
Figure 8. Antioxidant activity of H. manopappoides essential oil, eucalyptol, α-humulene, and β-caryophyllene. Panel (A) DPPH assay; Panel (B) H2O2 scavenging assay. H. manopappoides essential oil, eucalyptol, α-humulene, and β-caryophyllene were tested at concentrations ranging from 0 to 25 mg/mL. Data represent the average of three independent experiments. Statistical analysis was performed relative to the standard by a two-tailed paired t-test. p-value (* p ≤ 0.05; ** p < 0.01).
Plants 15 00672 g008
Figure 9. Cytotoxicity of H. manopappoides, eucalyptol, α-humulene, and β-caryophyllene on CaCo-2 cells assessed by MTT assay. Cell viability was evaluated after 24 h of treatment. Cells were treated with the highest concentrations corresponding to the MIC values for each compound. Data are expressed as a percentage of viable cells relative to untreated control (CTRL) and are presented as the means of three independent experiments. Statistical analysis was performed using a two-tailed paired t-test relative to untreated cells: * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, **** p < 0.0001.
Figure 9. Cytotoxicity of H. manopappoides, eucalyptol, α-humulene, and β-caryophyllene on CaCo-2 cells assessed by MTT assay. Cell viability was evaluated after 24 h of treatment. Cells were treated with the highest concentrations corresponding to the MIC values for each compound. Data are expressed as a percentage of viable cells relative to untreated control (CTRL) and are presented as the means of three independent experiments. Statistical analysis was performed using a two-tailed paired t-test relative to untreated cells: * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, **** p < 0.0001.
Plants 15 00672 g009
Figure 10. Effect of H. manopappoides, eucalyptol, α-humulene, and β-caryophyllene on intracellular ROS generation in CaCo-2 cells. Oxidative stress was evaluated using the CellROX™ fluorescent probe. CaCo-2 cells were treated with the highest concentrations corresponding to the MIC values for each compound for 24 h before ROS detection. Data are expressed as relative fluorescence intensity and are presented as the means of three independent experiments. Statistical analysis was performed using a two-tailed paired t-test relative to the untreated control (CTRL): ns not significant; **** p < 0.0001.
Figure 10. Effect of H. manopappoides, eucalyptol, α-humulene, and β-caryophyllene on intracellular ROS generation in CaCo-2 cells. Oxidative stress was evaluated using the CellROX™ fluorescent probe. CaCo-2 cells were treated with the highest concentrations corresponding to the MIC values for each compound for 24 h before ROS detection. Data are expressed as relative fluorescence intensity and are presented as the means of three independent experiments. Statistical analysis was performed using a two-tailed paired t-test relative to the untreated control (CTRL): ns not significant; **** p < 0.0001.
Plants 15 00672 g010
Table 1. Chemical composition (relative %) of Helichrysum manopappoides Humbert essential oil collected wild in Madagascar.
Table 1. Chemical composition (relative %) of Helichrysum manopappoides Humbert essential oil collected wild in Madagascar.
No.Compound aLRI bLRI cArea (%) d
11-Methylbutyl hydroperoxide8578550.07 ± 0.00
2α-Pinene9338352.09 ± 0.09
3Camphene9498510.25 ± 0.00
4β-Pinene9778760.58 ± 0.01
5β-Myrcene9959960.55 ± 0.02
6α-Terpinene101710200.26 ± 0.00
7p-Cymene102710240.48 ± 0.01
8Limonene103310290.49 ± 0.02
9Eucalyptol103710317.38 ± 0.36
10cis-Ocimene104210370.13 ± 0.00
11trans-Ocimene105310500.71 ± 0.01
12γ-Terpinene106210590.66 ± 0.01
13Terpinolene108910880.44 ± 0.02
14Linalool110710042.31 ± 0.11
15endo-Fenchol112411190.16 ± 0.00
16Borneol117711730.24 ± 0.01
174-Terpineol118611830.27 ± 0.00
18α-Terpineol120211970.59 ± 0.02
19endo-Fenchyl acetate122412200.08 ± 0.00
20Myrtenyl acetate133113260.18 ± 0.00
21δ-Elemene133813380.27 ± 0.00
22trans-Carvyl acetate134313420.63 ± 0.02
23α-Ylangene137413730.19 ± 0.00
24α-Copaene138113770.91 ± 0.02
25β-Caryophyllene1424141919.78 ± 0.89
26α-Guaiene144514401.98 ± 0.05
27Myltayl-4(12)-ene145414470.91 ± 0.02
28α-Humulene1469146614.75 ± 0.79
29trans-Cadina-1(6),4-diene148114760.94 ± 0.03
30Germacrene D148414811.00 ± 0.04
31β-Himachalene148914862.20 ± 0.10
32α-Curcumene149214860.52 ± 0.01
33β-Selinene149314900.77 ± 0.02
34Germacrene A150415091.26 ± 0.03
35δ-Amorphene150815111.99 ± 0.07
36γ-Cadinene151015121.41 ± 0.04
37α-Bulnesene151215090.90 ± 0.03
387-epi-α-Selinene152115221.19 ± 0.03
39δ-Cadinene152515233.29 ± 0.13
40γ-Cuprenene153215343.68 ± 0.12
41trans-Cadina-1,4-diene154314390.43 ± 0.01
42α-Cadinene154715440.90 ± 0.03
43trans-Nerolidol157115690.43 ± 0.02
44Caryophyllenyl alcohol157615732.03 ± 0.04
45Caryophyllene oxide159215891.48 ± 0.05
46Humulol161816182.21 ± 0.08
471-epi-Cubenol162716280.59 ± 0.01
48β-Eudesmol163516380.36 ± 0.01
49β-Acorenol163916370.77 ± 0.03
50Valerianol165616583.93 ± 0.18
51Bulnesol166916712.95 ± 0.11
52Khusinol168216800.92 ± 0.03
53Epoxy-pseudoisoeugenyl isobutyrate179617930.15 ± 0.00
Monoterpene Hydrocarbons 6.64 ± 0.19
Oxygenated Monoterpenes 11.84 ± 0.52
Sesquiterpene Hydrocarbons 59.27 ± 2.46
Oxygenated Sesquiterpenes 15.82 ± 0.56
Other 0.07 ± 0.00
Total 93.64 ± 3.73
a Components listed in order of elution on a DB-5MS apolar column; b LRIs based on the literature (https://webbook.nist.gov/ accessed on 20 November 2025); c experimental LRIs on a DB-5MS apolar column; d content is the relative area percentage of a single compound in the essential oil sample.
Table 2. Determination of the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC, expressed in mg/mL) of H. manopappoides essential oil against Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacterial strains. MIC values are the mean ± SD of three independent biological replicates.
Table 2. Determination of the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC, expressed in mg/mL) of H. manopappoides essential oil against Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacterial strains. MIC values are the mean ± SD of three independent biological replicates.
StrainMIC [mg/mL] + SD
E. coli13 ± 0.3
S. sonnei25 ± 0.5
S. tiphymorium20 ± 0.3
S. aureus15 ± 0.2
L. monocytogenes13 ± 0.9
C. albicans12 ± 0.1
Table 3. Determination of the minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC, expressed in mg/mL) of eucalyptol, α-humulene, and β-caryophyllene against E. coli and S. aureus. MIC values are the mean ± SD of three independent biological replicates.
Table 3. Determination of the minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC, expressed in mg/mL) of eucalyptol, α-humulene, and β-caryophyllene against E. coli and S. aureus. MIC values are the mean ± SD of three independent biological replicates.
StrainMIC [mg/mL] ± SD
Eucalyptolα-Humuleneβ-Caryophyllene
E. coli8 ± 0.18 ± 0.3>16
S. aureus16 ± 0.516 ± 0.6>16
Table 4. IC50 values for the antioxidant activity of H. manopappoides sample, eucalyptol, α-humulene, β-caryophyllene, and ascorbic acid (control) in the DPPH and H2O2 assays. Values represent the means of three independent experiments and are expressed in mg/mL and ±standard deviation SD.
Table 4. IC50 values for the antioxidant activity of H. manopappoides sample, eucalyptol, α-humulene, β-caryophyllene, and ascorbic acid (control) in the DPPH and H2O2 assays. Values represent the means of three independent experiments and are expressed in mg/mL and ±standard deviation SD.
IC50 [mg/mL] ± SD
SampleDPPHH2O2
H. manopappoides60 ± 230 ± 5
eucalyptol4 ± 0.55.1 ± 0.3
α-humulene5 ± 0.24 ± 0.9
β-caryophyllene5.2 ± 0.74.3 ± 0.7
Ascorbic acid0.03 ± 0.030.04 ± 0.05
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Castagliuolo, G.; Sordillo, A.; Ramaminirina, H.J.B.; Di Girolamo, D.; Varcamonti, M.; Badalamenti, N.; Rakotonandrasana, S.R.; Zanfardino, A.; Bruno, M.; Rasamison, V.E. Phytochemistry, Antimicrobial, and Antibiofilm Properties of Malagasy Helichrysum manopappoides Essential Oil. Plants 2026, 15, 672. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants15050672

AMA Style

Castagliuolo G, Sordillo A, Ramaminirina HJB, Di Girolamo D, Varcamonti M, Badalamenti N, Rakotonandrasana SR, Zanfardino A, Bruno M, Rasamison VE. Phytochemistry, Antimicrobial, and Antibiofilm Properties of Malagasy Helichrysum manopappoides Essential Oil. Plants. 2026; 15(5):672. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants15050672

Chicago/Turabian Style

Castagliuolo, Giusy, Alessia Sordillo, Henintsoa Jean Baptiste Ramaminirina, Daniela Di Girolamo, Mario Varcamonti, Natale Badalamenti, Stephan Richard Rakotonandrasana, Anna Zanfardino, Maurizio Bruno, and Vincent Emile Rasamison. 2026. "Phytochemistry, Antimicrobial, and Antibiofilm Properties of Malagasy Helichrysum manopappoides Essential Oil" Plants 15, no. 5: 672. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants15050672

APA Style

Castagliuolo, G., Sordillo, A., Ramaminirina, H. J. B., Di Girolamo, D., Varcamonti, M., Badalamenti, N., Rakotonandrasana, S. R., Zanfardino, A., Bruno, M., & Rasamison, V. E. (2026). Phytochemistry, Antimicrobial, and Antibiofilm Properties of Malagasy Helichrysum manopappoides Essential Oil. Plants, 15(5), 672. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants15050672

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop