Next Article in Journal
Genotyping-by-Sequencing Reveals Low Genetic Diversity and Pronounced Geographic Structuring in the Endangered Medicinal Plant Coptis chinensis var. brevisepala
Previous Article in Journal
Phage Therapy in Plant Disease Management: 110 Years of History, Current Challenges, and Future Trends
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Spore Morphology of Platycerium (Polypodiaceae) and Its Implications

1
School of Life Sciences & School of Ecology and Environmental Science, Yunnan University, Kunming 650504, China
2
Yunnan Gaoligongshan National Nature Reserve, Baoshan Bureau, Baoshan 678000, China
3
Centre for Gardening and Horticulture, Xishuangbanna Tropical Botanical Garden, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Menglun, Mengla 666303, China
4
Plant Fairyland, Boda Road, Kunming 650503, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Plants 2026, 15(3), 370; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants15030370
Submission received: 18 December 2025 / Revised: 16 January 2026 / Accepted: 19 January 2026 / Published: 24 January 2026
(This article belongs to the Section Plant Systematics, Taxonomy, Nomenclature and Classification)

Abstract

The spore characteristics of ferns play an important role in taxonomy; however, comprehensive spore data for most species of the genus Platycerium remain scarce. In this study, spores of Platycerium were examined using light microscopy and scanning electron microscopy. We established the first comprehensive dataset on spore morphology in Platycerium. Based on morphological characteristics, we classified the spores into four distinct types, each described in detail. Spore surface ornamentation proved to be an effective diagnostic feature for Platycerium coronarium, P. madagascariense, P. ridleyi, and P. stemaria. The systematic significance of spore morphology in Platycerium was discussed, while no significant linear correlation was found across Platycerium between spore sizes and genome sizes. Our findings are important for understanding the relationship between spores and ploidy levels in Polypodiaceae and their evolutionary implications.

1. Introduction

The genus Platycerium Desv. belongs to the family Polypodiaceae [1,2]. Morphologically, the leaves of Platycerium are strongly dimorphic, comprising a basal sterile leaf that clings to the substrate and a dichotomously forked trophosporophylls with coenosoroid to acrosoroid patches of sporangia [3,4,5]. Platycerium is known for its unique plant form and elegant posture [6]. With advantages such as strong stress tolerance and a long ornamental period, most species of the genus are often used as indoor hanging or wall-mounted ornamental plants [6,7]. Recently, utilizing genome-skimming sequencing, transcriptome sequencing, and flow cytometry, Zhao et al. [8] integrated evidence from plastomes, nuclear genes, ploidy levels, morphology, and geographic distribution to clarify the phylogeny and biogeographic history of Platycerium. Their study covered all 18 accepted native species and supported that Platycerium comprises three fully supported monophyletic clades: the Afro-American (AA) clade, which consists of seven species; the Javan-Australian (JA) clade with four species; and the Malayan-Asian (MA) clade comprising seven species. In addition, the AA and MA clades can be further divided into three and two subclades. In geographical distribution, the AA clade was only distributed in Africa, America, and Madagascar, but species of the JA clade and the MA clade were distributed in Southeast Asia and Oceania [8]. In addition, Zhao et al. [8] had detected that Platycerium alcicorne (P. Willemet) Desv. and P. veitchii (Underw.) C. Chr. might contain cryptic species, with P. alcicorne comprising P. alcicorne-Madagascar and P. alcicorne-Africa, and P. veitchii comprising P. veitchii-1 and P. veitchii-2. These cryptic species require further taxonomic evidence for verification.
Palynological data could provide important taxonomic evidence for plants [9,10]. In ferns, spore ornamentation varies among different lineages [9,11,12,13]. Species of the Pteridaceae typically have spherical spores with a trilete aperture and surface ornamentation that can be reticulate, ridged, or echinate, among others [11]. In contrast, spores of the Polypodiaceae possess a monolete aperture and exhibit relatively simple surface ornamentation, ranging from psilate to verrucate or tuberculate [9,12]. However, research on the spore morphology of Platycerium remains relatively limited. Tryon and Lugardon [5] were firstly observed Platycerium spores using scanning electron microscopy (SEM). They described six species: Platycerium bifurcatum (Cav.) C. Chr. and P. stemaria (P. Beauv.) Desv. had slightly papillate spore surfaces, but P. andinum Baker, P. elephantotis Schweinf., and P. wallichii Hooker exhibited short apertures and granules on their spore surfaces, while P. ridleyi Christ showed an irregular, somewhat echinate surface. Pérez-García et al. [14] described the spore morphological characteristics of P. andinum and P. wandae Raciborski. The average spore sizes of these two species were measured as 58 μm (length) × 35 μm (width), and the spore color of both species was weakly brown and lacked a perispore. However, the ornamentation of P. andinum exhibited a granulose surface, whereas P. wandae was smooth to slightly granulose. Jia [15] performed SEM on spores of P. wallichii, revealing that its spores were monolete and elliptical with granulate ornamentation. Nevertheless, a comprehensive and systematic study of Platycerium spores remains unavailable.
Within ferns, the relationship between spore sizes and ploidy levels has shown varied results. Passarelli et al. [16] and Li et al. [17] found a positive correlation between spore sizes and ploidy levels within Blechnum Linnaeus (64 samples) and Gaga Pryer, F.W. Li & Windham (44 samples). Sigel et al. [18], using 57 samples of Argyrochosma (J. Smith) Windham, revealed that spore size increased significantly with increasing ploidy. Recently, Gómez-Noguez et al. [19] measured spore size and mass across 23 fern species and found that among closely related fern species, the spore sizes of polyploids were usually significantly larger than those of diploids [20]. However, they also found no statistically significant correlation between spore sizes or mass and ploidy through statistical analysis. Another notable example was Ceratopteris richardii Brongn [21], which produces the largest fern spores (polar axis 89 μm, equatorial axis 126 μm, mass 800 ng). Its spore sizes were not associated with high ploidy [22] and were considered a species-specific adaptation strategy for aquatic environments [19]. Barrington et al. [23] found that in the genus Dryopteris Adanson, spores of diploid species [e.g., D. fragrans (Linnaeus) Schott, D. dilatata (Hoffmann) A. Gray] are inherently large, comparable in size to those of tetraploid species [e.g., D. campyloptera (Kunze) Clarkson]. This difference might be attributed to adaptations in diploids—such as dispersal or nutrient allocation—or environmental regulation, rather than ploidy. Similarly, the spore size of Isoetes storkii T.C. Palmer may be influenced by altitude and temperature, which could obscure the effect of ploidy [23]. These analyses indicated that spore size may be influenced by ecological adaptation and species-specific traits, and that ploidy might not be the sole determining factor [19,20,22,23]. Therefore, given the relative scarcity of chromosome count data for ferns [24] and the fact that both chromosome counting and flow cytometry require fresh plant materials, assessing ploidy via spore sizes retains significant biological relevance.
With these questions in mind, the objectives of this study are: (i) to clarify spore morphology of Platycerium using both Light Microscopy (LM) and SEM; (ii) to assess the phylogenetic signal of spore traits and their implications for species delimitation; and (iii) to evaluate the relationship between spore sizes and ploidy levels in Platycerium.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Taxon Sampling and Spore Observation

In addition to the 20 specimens of Platycerium previously used for both transcriptome and flow cytometry studies [8], we included 17 living materials cultivated in the greenhouses of Yunnan University and the Xishuangbanna Botanical Garden. In total, these 37 individuals represent all currently recognized 18 native species of Platycerium. Based on LM, we selected at least 20 well-developed spores from each material. For each material, spores were evenly mounted on sample stages using carbon tape, and the color was recorded. The stages were then placed in a BAL-TEC SCD005 vacuum ion sputter coated with a gold coating for 1.5 min. The coated samples were examined under a QUANTA 200 scanning electron microscope to examine spore morphology. Photographs were taken of the lateral, proximal, and distal surfaces and surface microstructures. The terminology used for spore morphological descriptions in this study follows established literature [5,9,12,13].

2.2. Genome Size Estimation and Phylogenetic Inference

Flow cytometry was employed to estimate the ploidy levels and genome sizes of Platycerium [8]. Experiments were conducted by the Molecular Biology Experiment Center (Germplasm Bank of Wild Species in Southwest China) using leaves of Zea mays L. B73 (2C = 2.96 pg) as the internal standard. The ploidy level and genome size of each sample were analyzed with a BD FACSCalibur flow cytometer. Phylogenetic reconstruction was performed using the Maximum Likelihood (ML) method based on a set of 812 single-copy nuclear genes identified by Zhao et al. [8] via transcriptome sequencing. The nucleotide substitution rate variation model was fitted using the ModelFinder tool under the corrected Akaike Information Criterion (AICc). ML analyses were conducted with 5000 ultrafast bootstraps replicates [25] in IQ-tree v2.1.3 [26].

2.3. Ancestral State Reconstruction and Correlation Analysis

To perform reconstruction of the ancestral state of morphology, we used the ML “fastAnc” method implemented with the “contMap” function in the R package “phytools v1.5-1” [27]. Three different models (equal-rates (ER), symmetric (SYM), and all-rates-different (ARD)) were fitted to the phylogenetic tree with the “fitDiscrete” command in the R package “geiger v2.0.11”, and the best models were selected by AICc. In total, three continuous characters (genome sizes, length of equatorial axis, and length of polar axis in spore) and two discrete traits of spore (colors and surfaces of ornamentation) were studied. In addition, we calculated the correlations between genome sizes and the equatorial and polar axis lengths of spores using the linear regression model “lm ()” function in R. Plots were generated using ggplot2 v2.2.1 [28].

3. Results

3.1. Spore Morphology of Platycerium

Under LM, spores of Platycerium exhibited both plump and slightly flattened forms. LM images of all species were available in Figure S1. The spores of P. andinum were flattened, whereas the spores of the remaining species were well-developed and plump (Figure 1, Figure 2, Figure 3 and Figure 4). In addition, the spores of Platycerium were almost exclusively yellowish-brown in color, with occasional ones in yellowish-white (P. ellisii Baker) or brown (P. superbum de Jonch. & Hennipman, P. wandae) (Table 1).
SEM observations revealed that the spore wall ornamentations of Platycerium included verrucate, psilate, irregular granulate, and tuberculate types. A comparative schematic diagram of the four types of spore surface ornamentation is shown in Figure S2. Unlike the other three ornamentation types, the irregular granulate type lacked a perispore. The spores possessing a perispore were observed to have a thin perispore, which was abraded; granules were observed in all types, and we described the spores of 20 species in this genus (Table 1; Figure 1, Figure 2, Figure 3 and Figure 4). The spores were consistently bilateral and monolete (Figure 1, Figure 2, Figure 3 and Figure 4). The length of the spore aperture was typically one-third to one-half of the total spore length (Figure 1, Figure 2, Figure 3 and Figure 4). The equatorial view was elliptical or long-elliptical, while the polar view was reniform, bean-shaped, or elliptical (Figure 1, Figure 2, Figure 3 and Figure 4). Based on the structure and ornamentation of the spore wall, the spores of Platycerium can be divided into the following four types.
Type 1. Verrucate. The spores possess a perispore, with small verrucae and granules on the surface. Most species in this genus belong to this type, such as Platycerium alcicorne (Figure 1A–F), P. elephantotis (Figure 2A–C), P. ellisii (Figure 2D–F), and P. grande (A. Cunn. ex Hook.) J. Sm. (Figure 2G–I), P. hillii T. Moore (Figure 2J–L), P. holttumii de Jonch. & Hennipman (Figure 2M–O), P. quadridichotomum (Bonap.) Tardieu (Figure 3D–F), P. superbum (Figure 3M–O), P. wallichii (Figure 4G–I), P. wandae (Figure 4J–L), P. willinckii (T. Moore) Hennipman & M.C. Roos (Figure 4M–O).
Type 2. Psilate. The spores lack a perispore and have a psilate surface with granules, such as Platycerium andinum (Figure 1G–I), P. bifurcatum (Figure 1J–L), P. veitchii (Figure 4A–F).
Type 3. Irregular Granulate. The spores had a perispore, densely covered with irregular granular protrusions on the surface, as seen in Platycerium coronarium (D. Koenig ex O.F. Müll.) Desv. (Figure 1M–O). In addition to granules, the spore surfaces also bore lamellate, clastic structures, as observed in P. ridleyi (Figure 3G–I).
Type 4. Tuberculate. The spores possess a perispore that is covered with regular tubercles. This characteristic was distinct in Platycerium madagascariense Baker (Figure 3A–C), whose spore surface was uniformly covered with large, flat tuberculate protrusions. The spores of P. stemaria also had small tubercles and granules on the surface (Figure 3J–L).

3.2. Spore Sizes of Platycerium

The original measurement data for all species were available in Table S1. The smallest spores measured in this study were Platycerium madagascariense, with an equatorial axis length of 31.0–50.3 μm and a polar axis length of 15.1–28.9 μm (Table 1). The largest spores were from P. veitchii-2, with an equatorial axis length of 55.4–103.0 μm and a polar axis length of 33.2–69.5 μm (Table 1). The average spore equatorial axis length of Platycerium ranges from 50 μm to 70 μm, while the average polar axis length ranges from 30 μm to 50 μm (Table 1; Figure 5B,C). Within the AA clade, the largest spores belong to P. quadridichotomum, measuring 69.2 × 38.7 μm, and the smallest spores are from P. madagascariense, measuring 36.2 × 22.1 μm (Table 1; Figure 5B,C). In the JA clade, the largest spores are those of P. veitchii-2, measuring 79.7 × 50.2 μm, while the smallest spores are from P. hillii, measuring 47.0 × 27.0 μm (Table 1; Figure 5B,C). Within the MA clade, the largest spores belong to P. superbum, measuring 76.0 × 41.1 μm, and the smallest spores are from P. grande, measuring 54.6 × 34.0 μm (Table 1; Figure 5B,C). Additionally, the equatorial and polar axes of spores in the AA clade are smaller than those in the JA and MA clades (Figure 5B,C and Figure 6C,D).

3.3. Phylogeny and Genome Sizes

A total of 812 single-copy nuclear genes shared by all 20 individuals were used to infer the phylogeny of Platycerium (Figure 5A). The genome sizes range from 11.44 Gb in Platycerium willinckii to 27.71 Gb in P. ellisii (Table 1; Figure 5A). The genome sizes of diploid species in Platycerium range from 11.44 Gb (P. willinckii) to 15.42 Gb (P. andinum), while tetraploid species have genome sizes approximately ranging from 16.35 Gb (P. wallichii) to 27.71 Gb (P. ellisii) (Table 1; Figure 5A). Both diploid and tetraploid species were found concurrently within the AA clade, JA clade, and MA clade. The majority of species were diploid (P. alcicorne, P. andinum, P. elephantotis, P. grande, P. hillii, P. madagascariense, P. quadridichotomum, P. stemaria, P. superbum, P. veitchii-1, P. wandae, and P. willinckii). In addition, there were seven tetraploid species (P. bifurcatum, P. coronarium, P. ellisii, P. holttumii, P. ridleyi, P. veitchii-2, and P. wallichii). Furthermore, different individuals of P. veitchii include both diploids (P. veitchii-1, genome size = 12.24 Gb) and tetraploids (P. veitchii-2, genome size = 22.56 Gb). Ancestral genome size reconstruction indicated that the ancestral genome size of Platycerium was approximately 12 Gb, with a weak phylogenetic signal (lambda = 7.71248 × 10−5, p = 1; K = 4.42408 × 10−1, p = 0.372). Diploidy was inferred as the ancestral ploidy state (Figure 5A).

3.4. Ancestral Character State Reconstruction

Four spore characteristics of Platycerium (spore type, spore color, equatorial axis length, and polar axis length) were selected for ancestral state reconstruction (Figure 6). The reconstruction of ancestral spore type indicated that verrucate ornamentation is the ancestral state for spores in this genus, with all other ornamentation types being derived (Figure 6A). In addition, the AA clade exhibits the greatest diversity of spore ornamentation types, including verrucate, psilate, and tuberculate (Figure 6A). The reconstruction of ancestral spore color revealed that yellowish-brown was the ancestral state for spores in Platycerium, while yellowish-white and brown were identified as derived states (Figure 6B). The reconstruction of the ancestral equatorial and polar axis sizes of Platycerium indicated that the equatorial axis size (lambda = 2.37038 × 10−1, p = 0.307451; K = 4.57666 × 10−1, p = 0.272; Figure 6C) was approximately 60 μm, and the polar axis length (lambda = 2.79871 × 10−1, p = 0.358509; K = 4.6246 × 10−1, p = 0.279; Figure 6D) was approximately 40 μm.

3.5. The Relationships Between Genome Sizes and Spore Sizes

Linear regression analysis revealed no significant relationship between genome size and either the equatorial or polar spore axis length in Platycerium (Figure 7). The analysis of the equatorial axis versus genome size showed R2 = 0.0184 and p = 0.2595 (Figure 7A), while the polar axis versus genome size showed R2 = 0.1124 and p = 0.0815 (Figure 7B). Both R2 were well below 0.5, indicating that genome size has very weak explanatory power for spore axis length, and the strength of the linear association is very low (Figure 7A,B). The p-values did not reach the significance level, which indicates that the linear association between genome size and spore axis length is not statistically significant (Figure 7A,B). In conclusion, the analysis demonstrated that spore size and genome size in Platycerium are not significantly linearly correlated (Figure 7).

4. Discussion

4.1. General Features and Stability of Platycerium Spore

This study documented substantial intraspecific variation in spore morphology among Platycerium, particularly in spore size and surface ornamentation (Table 1; Figure 1, Figure 2, Figure 3 and Figure 4). The spores of all species are elliptic or oblong in equatorial view and bean-shaped, kidney-shaped, or elliptic in polar view. They are monolete and possess a thin, abraded perispore. The surface ornamentation is formed by either the perispore or the exospore. These observations are consistent with previous studies on spore morphology in Polypodiaceae [9,12].
Colors and sizes: —Based on observations under LM, the spore colors of each species are observed and described in Table 1, including yellowish-brown, yellowish-white, and brown. Spore color was relatively stable and therefore had limited value for the taxonomy of Platycerium. Pérez-García et al. [14] reported weakly brown spores in Platycerium andinum and P. wandae, with average spore sizes of 58 μm × 35 μm. In this study, P. andinum spores were observed to be yellowish-brown, with an average size of 59.5 μm × 38.8 μm (Table 1), consistent with Pérez-García et al. [14]. However, the spores of P. wandae were brown, with an average size of 72.2 μm × 45.6 μm (Table 1). Our results indicate that yellowish-brown spore color is stable within the genus, and we documented spore size for each specimen (Table 1). We found that spore size varied continuously and was less stable. Additionally, ancestral state reconstruction revealed that yellowish-brown was the ancestral spore color in Platycerium, while yellowish-white and brown colors evolved independently twice (Figure 6A). The ancestral spore size was approximately 60 μm along the equatorial axis and 40 μm along the polar axis, followed by multiple independent evolution changes.
Surface ornamentations: —In contrast to the slightly papillate spore surfaces reported for P. bifurcatum and P. stemaria by Tryon and Lugardon [5], our study finds that P. bifurcatum has psilate ornamentation without perispore (Figure 1J–L), while P. stemaria tuberculate ornamentation with perispore (Figure 3J–L). Tryon and Lugardon [5] introduced that P. andinum, P. elephantotis, and P. wallichii exhibited short apertures and granules on their spore surfaces. Pérez-García et al. [14] reported that P. andinum and P. wandae lack a perispore and have granular material on the spore surface. Jia [15] performed SEM on spores of P. wallichii and revealed monolete, elliptical spores with granulate ornamentation. We agree with their description of granules on the spore surface for these species but provide a revised description: P. andinum lacks a perispore and has a psilate surface (Figure 1G–I), whereas P. elephantotis (Figure 2A–C), P. wallichii (Figure 4G–I), and P. wandae (Figure 4J–L) have a perispore with a verrucate surface. A previous study described P. ridleyi as having an irregular, somewhat echinate spore surface [5]. We also consider this a distinctive type of ornamentation and therefore refine its description as follows: P. ridleyi has a perispore with an irregular granulate surface featuring lamellate, clastic structures (Figure 3G–I). Based on detailed observations of spore ornamentation using SEM, the spores of Platycerium can be classified into four types (as mentioned above).
Based on the three core clades (AA, JA, and MA) defined by Zhao et al. [8], spore ornamentation does not exhibit particularly distinct differences across these major lineages. Within the AA clade, spore ornamentation includes verrucate, psilate, and tuberculate types. The tuberculate ornamentation is unique to this clade, particularly evident in P. madagascariense (Figure 3A–C), which possesses large, flat tubercles. In contrast, P. stemaria (Figure 3J–L) exhibits small tubercles with granules on the surface. In the AA clade, only the spores of P. andinum (Figure 1G–I) lack a perispore but have a psilate surface with granules, whereas the remaining species have small verrucae and granules (Figure 1A–F, Figure 2A–F and Figure 3D–F). In the JA clade, spore ornamentation comprises verrucate and psilate types. The spores of P. hillii (Figure 2J–L) and P. willinckii (Figure 4M–O) have small verrucae and granules, whereas those of P. bifurcatum (Figure 1J–L), P. veitchii-1 (Figure 4A–C), and P. veitchii-2 (Figure 4D–F) lack a perispore but have a psilate surface with granules. The MA clade exhibits verrucate and irregular granulate ornamentation. The spore surface ornamentation of P. coronarium (Figure 1M–O) and P. ridleyi (Figure 3G–I) is particularly distinctive and easily recognizable. The granular ornamentation is modified, characterized by irregular granules with clastic structures. Other species in this clade exhibit small verrucae and granules (Figure 2G–I,M–O, Figure 3M–O and Figure 4G–L). In summary, spore ornamentation observed under SEM clearly distinguishes P. coronarium (Figure 1M–O), P. madagascariense (Figure 3A–C), P. ridleyi (Figure 3G–I), and P. stemaria (Figure 3J–L). Our observations indicate that the most prevalent ornamentation in Platycerium spores is verrucate. Granules are present across all clades, with variations occurring at specific levels.

4.2. Systematic Significance of Spore Morphology of Platycerium

In ferns, spores of closely related polyploids are generally significantly larger than those of diploids [16,18,19,20,23]. This study found that spores of tetraploids were larger than those of diploids only within the JA clade (Figure 5). The spores of P. bifurcatum (tetraploid) were larger than those of its closest relative, P. hillii (diploid) (Figure 5A–C). The spores of P. veitchii-2 (tetraploid) were larger than those of the closely related diploids P. hillii and P. willinckii. However, in the AA clade and the MA clade, the spores of the remaining tetraploids (P. coronarium, P. ellisii, P. holttumii, P. ridleyi, and P. wallichii) were smaller than those of their closely related diploid individuals (Figure 5). Zhao et al. [8] suggested that P. alcicorne and P. veitchii may contain cryptic species. Our observations confirmed the existence of two ploidy variants in P. veitchii: P. veitchii-1 (diploid) and P. veitchii-2 (tetraploid) (Table 1; Figure 5A). Although they shared the same type of spore surface ornamentation (Figure 4A–F), their spore sizes differed significantly. The spores of P. veitchii-1 measured 62.4 × 41.0 µm, while those of P. veitchii-2 measured 79.7 × 50.2 µm (Table 1; Figure 5B,C and Figure 6C,D). In contrast, all observed individuals of P. alcicorne were diploid (Table 1; Figure 5A), exhibited uniform spore ornamentation (Figure 1A–F), and showed almost no variation in spore sizes (Table 1; Figure 5B,C and Figure 6C,D). Therefore, P. alcicorne and P. veitchii contain cryptic lineages which were supported by both phylogeny and cytology, and P. veitchii-1 and P. veitchii-2 can be distinguished based on spore size observation. However, the spore morphology alone cannot reliably differentiate P. alcicorne-Africa from P. alcicorne-Madagascar; effective identification requires integrating more evidence from cytology, molecular, and other data.
Ancestral state reconstruction of spore surface ornamentation provided evidence for the classification of Platycerium. Zhao et al. [8] confirmed that the AA clade and the MA clade could be further divided into three and two subclades. Within the AA clade, the subclade comprising P. elephantotis (Figure 2A–C and Figure 6A), P. stemaria (Figure 3J–L and Figure 6A), and P. andinum (Figure 1G–I and Figure 6A) was distinguished by their spore surface ornamentation. In the MA clade, distinct spore ornamentations characterized the two subclades: species in the first subclade all exhibited verrucate spore ornamentation, including P. grande, P. holttumii, P. superbum, P. wallichii, and P. wande, while those in the second subclade, composed of P. ridleyi and P. coronarium, all had irregular granulate ornamentation (Figure 6A). Spore color is generally considered to have limited taxonomic significance [29] and can not serve as an interspecific diagnostic character in Platycerium (Figure 6B). The AA clade possessed the smallest spores, with both equatorial and polar axis measurements generally smaller than those in the other two clades (Figure 5B,C and Figure 6C,D), consistent with the phylogenetic analysis by Zhao et al. [8].
Barrington et al. [20] demonstrated a strong positive correlation between spore size and genome size in Polystichum Roth and Adiantum L., but only under the condition that ploidy directly determines genome size within closely related species or species complexes. In our study, we observed that all tetraploid spores are larger than diploid ones within the JA clade, which implied a potential positive correlation between spore size and genome size in this lineage (Table 1). However, across the entire genus of Platycerium, no significant linear correlation was found between genome size and spore size (Figure 7). The tetraploid Platycerium ellisii had the largest genome (27.71 Gb) (Table 1; Figure 5) but did not have the largest spores, which measured 49.6 × 33.5 µm. The largest spores were found in P. veitchii-2 (79.7 × 50.2 µm), which had a genome size of 22.56 Gb (Table 1; Figure 5). Therefore, we propose that spore size is likely influenced by multiple factors, such as altitude, temperature, and species-specific characteristics. Ploidy and genome size may not be the decisive factors determining spore size [19,20,22,23].

5. Conclusions

This study established the first comprehensive spore morphological dataset for the genus Platycerium, including analyses of the proximal surfaces, distal surfaces, and surface ornamentation of the spores (Figure 1, Figure 2, Figure 3 and Figure 4). Statistical and phylogenetic analyses were conducted on spore color, types, and genome sizes within Platycerium (Figure 5, Figure 6 and Figure 7). These characteristics proved useful for species distinction and classification. For example, distinct spore ornamentation can distinguish P. coronarium (Table 1; Figure 1M–O), P. madagascariense (Table 1; Figure 3A–C), P. ridleyi (Table 1; Figure 3G–I), and P. stemaria (Table 1; Figure 3J–L). Additionally, spore equatorial and polar dimensions clearly showed that the AA clade has the smallest spores, with values generally lower than those of the other two clades (Figure 5B,C and Figure 6C,D). In addition, within the JA clade, polyploid species closely related to diploids typically exhibit significantly larger spores (Figure 5). However, we observed that spore color has limited taxonomic value in this genus, and no significant linear correlation was found between spore size and genome size (Figure 7).

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/plants15030370/s1, Table S1: Raw measurement data of spore sizes of Platycerium. Figure S1: Spore morphology of Platycerium species under LM. All scale bars represent 0.1 mm. The black arrows indicate the target spores. (A) Platycerium alcicorne-Africa, (B) P. alcicorne-Madagascar, (C) P. andinum, (D) P. bifurcatum, (E) P. coronarium, (F) P. elephantotis, (G) P. ellisii, (H) P. grande, (I) P. hillii, (J) P. holttumii, (K) P. madagascariense, (L) P. quadridichotomum, (M) P. ridleyi, (N) P. stemaria, (O) P. superbum, (P) P. veitchii-1, (Q) P. veitchii-2, (R) P. wallichii, (S) P. wandae, (T) P. willinckii. Figure S2: The four distinct types of spore surface ornamentation observed under SEM in Platycerium, with white arrows indicating key diagnostic characteristics. (A) Verrucate: Platycerium alcicorne-Madagascar. (B) Psilate: P. bifurcatum. (C) Irregular granulate: P. coronarium. (D) Tuberculate: P. madagascariense.

Author Contributions

C.-L.X. and J.-G.W. designed the research; D.-N.M. and B.Y. performed the research; L.-J.J., H.-B.N., S.Y., X.-M.Z., J.-R.Z., and Z.-R.H. contributed materials; J.Z. analyzed data; D.-N.M., B.Y., C.-L.X., and J.-G.W. wrote the paper. D.-N.M. and B.Y. contributed equally to this work. The authors also thank the anonymous referees and editors for their critiques and suggestions, which greatly improved our manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was supported by the Funding for Undergraduate University-Reserve-Research (URR) Cultivation Program, School of Life Sciences, Yunnan University, Yunnan Provincial Wildlife Conservation Project (Grant NO. 2025GS205Z-01), the Project of Yunnan Provincial Department of Education Science Research Fund (Grant NO. 2026Y0253), and the Practical Innovation Project of Postgraduate Students in the Professional Degree of Yunnan University (Grant NO. ZC-252513191).

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in this study are included in the article/Supplementary Material. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding authors.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Zhang, X.-C.; Lu, S.-G.; Lin, Y.-X.; Qi, X.-P.; Moore, S.; Xing, F.-W.; Wang, F.-G.; Hovenkamp, P.H.; Gilbert, M.G.; Nooteboom, H.P.; et al. Polypodiaceae. In Flora of China; Wu, Z.-Y., Raven, P.H., Hong, D.Y., Eds.; Science Press: Beijing, China; Missouri Botanical Garden Press: St. Louis, MO, USA, 2013; Volume 2–3, pp. 758–850. [Google Scholar]
  2. PPG I. A community-derived classification for extant lycophytes and ferns. J. Syst. Evol. 2016, 54, 563–603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Hoshizaki, B.J. Morphology phylogeny of Platycerium species. Biotropica 1972, 4, 93–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Hennipman, E.; Roos, M.C. A Monograph of the Fern Genus Platycerium (Polypodiaceae); Tweede Reeks; Koninklijke Nederlandse Akademie van Wetenschappen (KNAW): Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1982; pp. 1–126. [Google Scholar]
  5. Tryon, A.F.; Lugardon, B. Spores of the Pteridophyta: Surface, Wall Structure, and Diversity Based on Electron Microscope Studies; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 1991; pp. 305–307. [Google Scholar]
  6. Wu, J.-S.; Ye, X.-X.; Lin, R.-Y. Reproduction and cultivation techniques of Platycerium bifurcatum. Southeast Hortic. 2020, 8, 33–36. [Google Scholar]
  7. Shen, X.-L.; Wang, W.-Y.; Yu, X.-Y. Research advances in the genus Platycerium. Mod. Agric. Sci. Technol. 2008, 12, 32–47. [Google Scholar]
  8. Zhao, J.; Huang, C.-J.; Jiang, L.-J.; He, Z.-R.; Yang, S.; Zhu, Z.-M.; Zhang, L.; Yu, H.; Zhou, X.-M.; Wang, J.-G. Phylogenomic analyses of the pantropical Platycerium Desv. (Platycerioideae) reveal their complex evolution and historical biogeography. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2024, 201, 108213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Yin, Z.-L. Study on the Identification of Davallioid in Yunnan. Ph.D. Thesis, Yunnan University, Kunming, China, May 2019. [Google Scholar]
  10. Qu, T.-M.; Chen, X.-Y.; Zheng, X.-Y.; Zhang, Y.-R.; Shao, Y.-Z.; Sun, H.-Z.; Zhang, B.; Xie, G.; Fu, Z.-X. Pollen morphology and species differentiation in selected species of Inuleae (Asteraceae). PhytoKeys 2025, 263, 215–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Yu, J.; Wang, Q.-X.; Bao, W.-M. Spore morphology of pteridophytes from China II. Sinopteridaceae. Acta Phytotaxon. Sin. 2001, 39, 224–233. [Google Scholar]
  12. Jiang, N.; Dai, X.-L.; Cao, J.-G.; Wang, Q.-X. Spore morphology of Pteridophytes from China X. Polypodiacea. Acta Bot. Boreal.-Occident. Sin. 2010, 30, 2151–2163. [Google Scholar]
  13. Zhou, X.-M.; Jiang, L.-J.; Zhang, L.; Gao, X.-F.; He, Z.-R.; Zhang, L.-B. Spore morphology of Selaginella (Selaginellaceae) from China and its systematic significance. Phytotaxa 2015, 237, 1–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Pérez-García, B.; Mendoza-Ruiz, A.; Espinosa-Matías, S.; Gómez-Pignataro, L.D. Gametophyte morphology of Platycerium andinum Baker and Platycerium wandae Racif. Micron 2010, 41, 806–813. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Jia, X.-L. The Structure, Composition and Function of Spore/Pollen Wall. Ph.D. Thesis, Shanghai Normal University, Shanghai, China, 2024. [Google Scholar]
  16. Passarelli, L.M.; Gabriel, Y.; Galán, J.M.; Prada, C.; Rolleri, C.H. Spore morphology and ornamentation in the genus Blechnum (Blechnaceae). Grana 2010, 49, 243–262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Li, F.-W.; Pryer, K.M.; Windham, M.D. Gaga, a new fern genus segregated from Cheilanthes (Pteridaceae). Syst. Bot. 2012, 37, 845–860. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Sigel, E.M.; Windham, M.D.; Huiet, L.; Yatskievych, G.; Pryer, K.M. Species relationships and farina evolution in the cheilanthoid fern genus Argyrochosma (Pteridaceae). Syst. Bot. 2011, 36, 554–564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Gómez-Noguez, F.; Pérez-García, B.; Mehltreter, K.; Orozco-Segovia, A.; Rosas-Pérez, I. Spore mass and morphometry of some fern species. Flora 2016, 223, 99–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Barrington, D.S.; Patel, N.R.; Southgate, M.W. Inferring the impacts of evolutionary history and ecological constraints on spore size and shape in the ferns. Appl. Plant Sci. 2020, 8, e11339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Erdtman, G.; Sorsa, P. Pollen and Spore Morphology/Plant Taxonomy, Pteridophyta; Almqvist & Wiksell Boktryckeri AB: Stockholm, Sweden, 1971. [Google Scholar]
  22. Hickok, L.G.; Warne, T.R. Laboratory investigations with C-FernTM (Ceratopteris richardii). In Tested Studies for Laboratory Teaching, Proceedings of the 19th Workshop/Conference of the Association for Biology Laboratory Education (ABLE), Calgary, AB, Canada, 10–14 June 1997; Karcher, S.J., Ed.; Association for Biology Laboratory Education: Claremont, CA, USA, 1998; pp. 143–176. [Google Scholar]
  23. Barrington, D.S.; Paris, C.A.; Ranker, T.A. Systematic inferences from spore and stomata size in the ferns. Am. Fern J. 1986, 76, 149–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Rice, A.; Glick, L.; Abadi, S.; Einhorn, M.; Kopelman, N.M.; Salman-Minkov, A.; Mayzel, J.; Chay, O.; Mayrose, I. The chromosome counts database (CCDB)—A community resource of plant chromosome numbers. New Phytol. 2014, 206, 19–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Hoang, D.T.; Chernomor, O.; von Haeseler, A.; Minh, B.Q.; Vinh, L.S. UFBoot2: Improving the ultrafast bootstrap approximation. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2018, 35, 518–522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Nguyen, L.T.; Schmidt, H.A.; von Haeseler, A.; Minh, B.Q. IQ-TREE: A fast and effective stochastic algorithm for estimating maximum likelihood phylogenies. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2015, 32, 268–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Revell, L.J. Phytools: An R package for phylogenetic comparative biology (and other things). Meth. Ecol. Evol. 2012, 3, 217–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Wickham, H. ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2009; 260p. [Google Scholar]
  29. Alston, A.H.G. The Genus Selaginella in Tropical South America; British Museum: London, UK, 1981; Volume 9, pp. 233–330. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Spore morphology of Platycerium. (AC) P. alcicorne-Africa. (DF) P. alcicorne-Madagascar. (GI) P. andinum. (JL) P. bifurcatum. (MO) P. coronarium. (A,D,G,J,M) Proximal surfaces; (B,E,H,K,N) Distal surfaces; (C,F,I,L,O) Portions of proximal surface enlarged to show infrastructural detail. White arrows indicate diagnostic ornamentation features.
Figure 1. Spore morphology of Platycerium. (AC) P. alcicorne-Africa. (DF) P. alcicorne-Madagascar. (GI) P. andinum. (JL) P. bifurcatum. (MO) P. coronarium. (A,D,G,J,M) Proximal surfaces; (B,E,H,K,N) Distal surfaces; (C,F,I,L,O) Portions of proximal surface enlarged to show infrastructural detail. White arrows indicate diagnostic ornamentation features.
Plants 15 00370 g001
Figure 2. Spore morphology of Platycerium. (AC) P. elephantotis. (DF) P. ellisii. (GI) P. grande. (JL) P. hillii. (MO) P. holttumii. (A,D,G,J,M) Proximal surfaces; (B,E,H,K,N) Distal surfaces; (C,F,I,L,O) Portions of proximal surface enlarged to show infrastructural detail. White arrows indicate diagnostic ornamentation features.
Figure 2. Spore morphology of Platycerium. (AC) P. elephantotis. (DF) P. ellisii. (GI) P. grande. (JL) P. hillii. (MO) P. holttumii. (A,D,G,J,M) Proximal surfaces; (B,E,H,K,N) Distal surfaces; (C,F,I,L,O) Portions of proximal surface enlarged to show infrastructural detail. White arrows indicate diagnostic ornamentation features.
Plants 15 00370 g002
Figure 3. Spore morphology of Platycerium. (AC) P. madagascariense. (DF) P. quadridichotomum. (GI) P. ridleyi. (JL) P. stemaria. (MO) P. superbum. (A,D,G,J,M) Proximal surfaces; (B,E,H,K,N) Distal surfaces; (C,F,I,L,O) Portions of proximal surface enlarged to show infrastructural detail. White arrows indicate diagnostic ornamentation features.
Figure 3. Spore morphology of Platycerium. (AC) P. madagascariense. (DF) P. quadridichotomum. (GI) P. ridleyi. (JL) P. stemaria. (MO) P. superbum. (A,D,G,J,M) Proximal surfaces; (B,E,H,K,N) Distal surfaces; (C,F,I,L,O) Portions of proximal surface enlarged to show infrastructural detail. White arrows indicate diagnostic ornamentation features.
Plants 15 00370 g003
Figure 4. Spore morphology of Platycerium. (AC) P. veitchii-1. (DF) P. veitchii-2. (GI) P. wallichii. (JL) P. wandae. (MO) P. willinckii. (A,D,G,J,M) Proximal surfaces; (B,E,H,K,N) Distal surfaces; (C,F,I,L,O) Portions of proximal surface enlarged to show infrastructural detail. White arrows indicate diagnostic ornamentation features.
Figure 4. Spore morphology of Platycerium. (AC) P. veitchii-1. (DF) P. veitchii-2. (GI) P. wallichii. (JL) P. wandae. (MO) P. willinckii. (A,D,G,J,M) Proximal surfaces; (B,E,H,K,N) Distal surfaces; (C,F,I,L,O) Portions of proximal surface enlarged to show infrastructural detail. White arrows indicate diagnostic ornamentation features.
Plants 15 00370 g004
Figure 5. Ancestral state reconstruction of genome sizes and boxplots of spore morphological characteristics of Platycerium. (A) Genome size. (B) Equatorial axis. (C) Polar axis.
Figure 5. Ancestral state reconstruction of genome sizes and boxplots of spore morphological characteristics of Platycerium. (A) Genome size. (B) Equatorial axis. (C) Polar axis.
Plants 15 00370 g005
Figure 6. Ancestral spore states reconstruction of Platycerium. (A) Spore type. (B) Spore color. (C) Equatorial axis length. (D) Polar axis length.
Figure 6. Ancestral spore states reconstruction of Platycerium. (A) Spore type. (B) Spore color. (C) Equatorial axis length. (D) Polar axis length.
Plants 15 00370 g006
Figure 7. Linear regression analysis of spore sizes and genome sizes in Platycerium. (A) Equatorial axis. (B) Polar axis.
Figure 7. Linear regression analysis of spore sizes and genome sizes in Platycerium. (A) Equatorial axis. (B) Polar axis.
Plants 15 00370 g007
Table 1. Characteristics of spore morphology and genome size of Platycerium included in this study.
Table 1. Characteristics of spore morphology and genome size of Platycerium included in this study.
SpeciesSpore ColorPloidy LevelGenome Size (Gb)Spore Equatorial × Polar Axis (µm)OrnamentationFigure
Platycerium alcicorne-AfricaYellowish-brownDiploid12.81(43.2–59.0) 50.3 × 29.6 (22.9–38.2)With perispore, small verrucae, and abundant granulesFigure 1A–C
P. alcicorne-MadagascarYellowish-brownDiploid14.14(40.4–71.1) 58.9 × 36.4 (23.0–43.2)With perispore, small verrucae, and granulesFigure 1D–F
P. andinumYellowish-brownDiploid15.42(49.4–68.3) 59.5 × 38.8 (27.0–48.6)Without a perispore, with a psilate surface and granulesFigure 1G–I
P. bifurcatumYellowish-brownTetraploid20.42(58.8–88.8) 73.2 × 43.9 (33.1–49.7)Without a perispore, with a psilate surface and granulesFigure 1J–L
P. coronariumYellowish-brownTetraploid19.38(61.5–81.5) 70.0 × 48.7 (32.0–56.6)With perispore, irregular granulate with clustered, clastic structuresFigure 1M–O
P. elephantotisYellowish-brownDiploid13.24(48.9–70.0) 59.6 × 43.4 (33.4–50.1)With perispore, small verrucae, and granulesFigure 2A–C
P. ellisiiYellowish-whiteTetraploid27.71(44.8–55.2) 49.6 × 33.5 (27.4–39.3)With perispore, small verrucae, and granulesFigure 2D–F
P. grandeYellowish-brownDiploid13.70(38.0–71.5) 54.6 × 34.0 (22.6–41.7)With perispore, small verrucae, and granulesFigure 2G–I
P. hilliiYellowish-brownDiploid12.48(38.0–67.0) 47.0 × 27.0 (19.2–32.9)With perispore, small verrucae, and granulesFigure 2J–L
P. holttumiiYellowish-brownTetraploid17.20(45.9–82.0) 59.7 × 37.1 (25.6–48.4)With perispore, small verrucae, and granulesFigure 2M–O
P. madagascarienseYellowish-brownDiploid12.68(31.0–50.3) 36.2 × 22.1 (15.1–28.9)With perispore, large and flat tuberclesFigure 3A–C
P. quadridichotomumYellowish-brownDiploid15.31(45.1–82.8) 69.2 × 38.7 (25.9–49.8)With perispore, small verrucae, and granulesFigure 3D–F
P. ridleyiYellowish-brownTetraploid22.01(51.9–89.0) 70.9 × 48.5 (34.4–61.5)With perispore, irregular granulate with lamellate, clastic structuresFigure 3G–I
P. stemariaYellowish-brownDiploid12.08(40.7–73.7) 55.0 × 36.5 (27.0–48.6)With perispore, small tubercles, and granulesFigure 3J–L
P. superbumBrownDiploid11.83(62.0–94.4) 76.0 × 41.1 (26.4–58.6)With perispore, small verrucae, and granulesFigure 3M–O
P. veitchii-1Yellowish-brownDiploid12.24(54.4–68.5) 62.4 × 41.0 (33.5–49.6)Without a perispore, with a psilate surface and granulesFigure 4A–C
P. veitchii-2Yellowish-brownTetraploid22.56(55.4–103.0) 79.7 × 50.2 (33.2–69.5)Without a perispore, with a psilate surface and granulesFigure 4D–F
P. wallichiiYellowish-brownTetraploid16.35(56.3–92.4) 70.8 × 41.7 (32.9–57.7)With perispore, small verrucae, and granulesFigure 4G–I
P. wandaeBrownDiploid13.81(51.1–84.6) 72.2 × 45.6 (29.6–54.9)With perispore, small verrucae, and granulesFigure 4J–L
P. willinckiiYellowish-brownDiploid11.44(50.5–73.4) 62.4 × 35.9 (23.6–41.1)With perispore, small verrucae, and granulesFigure 4M–O
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ma, D.-N.; Yang, B.; Zhao, J.; Jiang, L.-J.; Niu, H.-B.; Yang, S.; Zhang, J.-R.; Zhou, X.-M.; He, Z.-R.; Xu, C.-L.; et al. Spore Morphology of Platycerium (Polypodiaceae) and Its Implications. Plants 2026, 15, 370. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants15030370

AMA Style

Ma D-N, Yang B, Zhao J, Jiang L-J, Niu H-B, Yang S, Zhang J-R, Zhou X-M, He Z-R, Xu C-L, et al. Spore Morphology of Platycerium (Polypodiaceae) and Its Implications. Plants. 2026; 15(3):370. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants15030370

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ma, Dan-Ni, Bin Yang, Jing Zhao, Li-Ju Jiang, Hong-Bin Niu, Shuai Yang, Jian-Rong Zhang, Xin-Mao Zhou, Zhao-Rong He, Cong-Li Xu, and et al. 2026. "Spore Morphology of Platycerium (Polypodiaceae) and Its Implications" Plants 15, no. 3: 370. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants15030370

APA Style

Ma, D.-N., Yang, B., Zhao, J., Jiang, L.-J., Niu, H.-B., Yang, S., Zhang, J.-R., Zhou, X.-M., He, Z.-R., Xu, C.-L., & Wang, J.-G. (2026). Spore Morphology of Platycerium (Polypodiaceae) and Its Implications. Plants, 15(3), 370. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants15030370

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop