Morphology of Chinese Chive and Onion (Allium; Amaryllidaceae) Crop Wild Relatives: Taxonomical Relations and Implications
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Results
2.1. External Morphology
2.1.1. Interspecific Variation
2.1.2. Seed Outline Analysis
2.2. Micromorphological Analysis
2.3. Phylogenetic Analysis
2.3.1. Phylogenetic Analysis of the Outline
2.3.2. Phylogenetic Analysis
3. Discussion
- (A)
- The protrusions on the seed coat basilar wall degenerated during the separation of the species from Anguinum and other subgenera.
- (B)
- After the divergence of subg. Butomissa, the borders of the seed coat cells developed irregular shapes, and the thickness of the exotesta decreased.
- (C)
- In subg. Rhizirideum, granulates formed between the intercellular anticlinal walls.
- (D)
- In subg. Cepa, the thickness of the exotesta was reduced.
4. Materials and Methods
4.1. Samples
4.2. Analysis of External Morphological Characteristics
Outline Analysis
4.3. Micromorphological Analysis
4.4. Analysis of Phylogenetic Relationships
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
Abbreviations
| CWR | Crop Wild Relative |
| FAMD | Factor Analysis Mixed Data |
| PCA | Principal Component Analysis |
| SEM | Scanning Electron Microscope |
Appendix A
| Taxon | R | G | B | Length (mm) | Width (mm) | Height (mm) | Betashape a | Betashape b |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Allium longistylum 1 | 48.02 ± 5.11 | 42.99 ± 5.37 | 33.63 ± 6.58 | 2.64 ± 0.31 | 1.87 ± 0.21 | 0.49 ± 0.46 | 1.57 ± 0.24 | 1.44 ± 0.17 |
| A. longistylum 2 | 42.61 ± 4.27 | 38.74 ± 4.42 | 29.68 ± 5.64 | 3.08 ± 0.30 | 2.06 ± 0.21 | 0.55 ± 0.13 | 1.55 ± 0.17 | 1.45 ± 0.16 |
| A. longistylum 3 | 50.44 ± 7.06 | 47.69 ± 7.30 | 41.17 ± 8.26 | 3.18 ± 0.37 | 2.08 ± 0.23 | 0.49 ± 0.15 | 1.53 ± 0.20 | 1.41 ± 0.14 |
| A. tuberosum | 48.35 ± 4.36 | 46.78 ± 5.05 | 38.72 ± 6.54 | 3.25 ± 0.19 | 2.25 ± 0.13 | 1.36 ± 0.17 | 1.66 ± 0.15 | 1.54 ± 0.12 |
| A. dumebuchum | 56.59 ± 5.04 | 54.23 ± 4.94 | 48.42 ± 5.19 | 3.39 ± 0.34 | 2.13 ± 0.19 | 0.73 ± 0.17 | 1.59 ± 0.15 | 1.44 ± 0.13 |
| A. anisopodium | 55.97 ± 5.61 | 51.67 ± 5.78 | 43.35 ± 6.30 | 2.69 ± 0.28 | 2.09 ± 0.23 | 0.82 ± 0.24 | 1.52 ± 0.18 | 1.34 ± 0.13 |
| A. taquaii | 32.81 ± 6.32 | 29.60 ± 6.33 | 17.26 ± 8.57 | 3.03 ± 0.22 | 2.59 ± 0.27 | 2.22 ± 0.31 | 1.58 ± 0.13 | 1.50 ± 0.10 |
| A. microdictyon | 45.55 ± 6.83 | 42.03 ± 6.60 | 33.93 ± 8.01 | 3.24 ± 0.27 | 2.27 ± 0.29 | 0.73 ± 0.51 | 1.54 ± 0.16 | 1.44 ± 0.13 |
| A. ulleungense | 48.23 ± 4.66 | 44.08 ± 5.05 | 35.80 ± 5.98 | 2.36 ± 0.41 | 1.77 ± 0.23 | 1.60 ± 0.47 | 1.80 ± 0.33 | 1.59 ± 0.22 |
| A. thunbergii | 47.37 ± 4.23 | 42.84 ± 4.40 | 33.61 ± 5.46 | 2.35 ± 0.28 | 1.77 ± 0.24 | 1.38 ± 0.59 | 1.76 ± 0.36 | 1.53 ± 0.17 |
| var. terafolium | 47.54 ± 4.53 | 44.89 ± 5.12 | 37.93 ± 6.09 | 3.44 ± 0.35 | 2.11 ± 0.18 | 1.50 ± 1.12 | 1.58 ± 0.13 | 1.44 ± 0.10 |
| A. saccifolium | 36.13 ± 7.05 | 33.46 ± 7.45 | 22.88 ± 9.60 | 3.03 ± 0.21 | 2.51 ± 0.36 | 1.99 ± 0.81 | 1.60 ± 0.14 | 1.51 ± 0.10 |
| A. spirale | 51.02 ± 4.71 | 48.68 ± 5.05 | 40.95 ± 5.93 | 2.91 ± 0.38 | 1.85 ± 0.37 | 1.33 ± 0.34 | 1.52 ± 0.16 | 1.40 ± 0.12 |
| Chungrim-buchu | 48.47 ± 4.21 | 44.89 ± 4.26 | 35.52 ± 4.75 | 3.59 ± 0.24 | 2.53 ± 0.23 | 1.12 ± 0.42 | 1.61 ± 0.13 | 1.44 ± 0.11 |
| Greenbelt | 54.24 ± 5.17 | 50.92 ± 5.20 | 43.46 ± 5.78 | 3.15 ± 0.36 | 2.18 ± 0.28 | 0.94 ± 0.47 | 1.55 ± 0.12 | 1.44 ± 0.08 |
| Dume-buchu | 48.44 ± 5.42 | 45.19 ± 5.68 | 36.12 ± 6.86 | 3.18 ± 0.24 | 2.31 ± 0.23 | 1.43 ± 0.25 | 1.55 ± 0.10 | 1.42 ± 0.08 |
| Taxon | Ellipse Compactness | Circle Compactness | Area (mm2) | W/A | W/L | Rectangularity | Region Horizonal Length Mean | Region Vertical Length Mean |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Allium longistylum 1 | 0.98 ± 0.01 | 0.69 ± 0.08 | 3.67 ± 0.78 | 0.52 ± 0.08 | 0.71 ± 0.08 | 0.78 ± 0.03 | 0.73 ± 0.05 | 0.74 ± 0.05 |
| A. longistylum 2 | 0.99 ± 0.01 | 0.66 ± 0.08 | 4.77 ± 0.80 | 0.45 ± 0.07 | 0.67 ± 0.08 | 0.78 ± 0.03 | 0.74 ± 0.03 | 0.76 ± 0.03 |
| A. longistylum 3 | 0.98 ± 0.01 | 0.65 ± 0.08 | 4.98 ± 0.95 | 0.66 ± 0.08 | 0.78 ± 0.03 | 0.78 ± 0.03 | 0.74 ± 0.04 | 0.76 ± 0.04 |
| A. tuberosum | 0.99 ± 0.01 | 0.70 ± 0.05 | 5.37 ± 0.42 | 0.42 ± 0.02 | 0.69 ± 0.05 | 0.76 ± 0.02 | 0.73 ± 0.03 | 0.74 ± 0.03 |
| A. dumebuchum | 0.99 ± 0.01 | 0.62 ± 0.07 | 5.37 ± 0.86 | 0.40 ± 0.05 | 0.63 ± 0.07 | 0.77 ± 0.02 | 0.74 ± 0.03 | 0.75 ± 0.03 |
| A. anisopodium | 0.97 ± 0.02 | 0.74 ± 0.08 | 4.13 ± 0.78 | 0.51 ± 0.06 | 0.78 ± 0.07 | 0.77 ± 0.03 | 0.73 ± 0.04 | 0.74 ± 0.04 |
| A. taquaii | 0.99 ± 0.02 | 0.86 ± 0.07 | 5.89 ± 0.93 | 0.44 ± 0.03 | 0.85 ± 0.07 | 0.79 ± 0.02 | 0.75 ± 0.02 | 0.75 ± 0.02 |
| A. microdictyon | 0.99 ± 0.01 | 0.69 ± 0.11 | 5.49 ± 0.85 | 0.42 ± 0.04 | 0.70 ± 0.10 | 0.78 ± 0.02 | 0.74 ± 0.03 | 0.75 ± 0.03 |
| A. ulleungense | 0.97 ± 0.02 | 0.74 ± 0.09 | 2.98 ± 0.96 | 0.62 ± 0.11 | 0.76 ± 0.09 | 0.77 ± 0.03 | 0.70 ± 0.05 | 0.71 ± 0.05 |
| A. thunbergii | 0.98 ± 0.01 | 0.75 ± 0.11 | 2.99 ± 0.57 | 0.60 ± 0.07 | 0.76 ± 0.11 | 0.78 ± 0.03 | 0.71 ± 0.04 | 0.72 ± 0.05 |
| var. terafolium | 0.98 ± 0.01 | 0.61 ± 0.07 | 5.45 ± 0.85 | 0.39 ± 0.05 | 0.62 ± 0.07 | 0.77 ± 0.02 | 0.74 ± 0.03 | 0.75 ± 0.03 |
| A. saccifolium | 0.99 ± 0.01 | 0.83 ± 0.11 | 5.69 ± 1.04 | 0.44 ± 0.03 | 0.83 ± 0.11 | 0.79 ± 0.02 | 0.74 ± 0.02 | 0.75 ± 0.03 |
| A. spirale | 0.98 ± 0.01 | 0.62 ± 0.08 | 4.12 ± 1.35 | 0.47 ± 0.06 | 0.63 ± 0.07 | 0.78 ± 0.03 | 0.74 ± 0.03 | 0.76 ± 0.03 |
| Chungrim-buchu | 0.97 ± 0.01 | 0.69 ± 0.08 | 6.71 ± 0.83 | 0.38 ± 0.03 | 0.71 ± 0.07 | 0.76 ± 0.02 | 0.73 ± 0.03 | 0.74 ± 0.03 |
| Greenbelt | 0.98 ± 0.01 | 0.68 ± 0.05 | 5.26 ± 1.16 | 0.43 ± 0.05 | 0.70 ± 0.05 | 0.78 ± 0.02 | 0.75 ± 0.03 | 0.76 ± 0.03 |
| Dume-buchu | 0.98 ± 0.01 | 0.72 ± 0.07 | 5.58 ± 0.8 | 0.42 ± 0.03 | 0.73 ± 0.07 | 0.78 ± 0.02 | 0.75 ± 0.02 | 0.98 ± 0.01 |
| Taxon | Skew X | Skew Y | PhiRad Symmetry Stat Mean | PhiRad Symmetry Stat Max | Kurt X | Kurt Y | Moment X | Moment Y |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Allium longistylum 1 | 0.08 ± 0.06 | 0.07 ± 0.06 | 0.02 ± 0.01 | 0.05 ± 0.02 | 0.99 ± 0.06 | 0.99 ± 0.07 | 232.07 ± 52.67 | 476.74 ± 116.86 |
| A. longistylum 2 | 0.07 ± 0.05 | 0.05 ± 0.04 | 0.02 ± 0.01 | 0.04 ± 0.01 | 1.00 ± 0.04 | 1.00 ± 0.05 | 286.56 ± 58.17 | 645.25 ± 127.15 |
| A. longistylum 3 | 0.08 ± 0.06 | 0.07 ± 0.05 | 0.02 ± 0.01 | 0.04 ± 0.01 | 1.00 ± 0.05 | 1.00 ± 0.06 | 293.26 ± 65.48 | 692.61 ± 157.83 |
| A. tuberosum | 0.09 ± 0.03 | 0.06 ± 0.04 | 0.02 ± 0.00 | 0.05 ± 0.01 | 0.98 ± 0.04 | 0.96 ± 0.04 | 343.56 ± 35.91 | 678.81 ± 70.79 |
| A. dumebuchum | 0.08 ± 0.05 | 0.08 ± 0.04 | 0.02 ± 0.01 | 0.04 ± 0.01 | 0.99 ± 0.04 | 0.99 ± 0.05 | 303.82 ± 55.43 | 772.70 ± 151.24 |
| A. anisopodium | 0.13 ± 0.05 | 0.10 ± 0.07 | 0.02 ± 0.01 | 0.05 ± 0.01 | 0.99 ± 0.06 | 1.01 ± 0.06 | 288.06 ± 63.20 | 499.20 ± 96.53 |
| A. taquaii | 0.04 ± 0.04 | 0.04 ± 0.03 | 0.01 ± 0.01 | 0.03 ± 0.01 | 0.99 ± 0.03 | 0.99 ± 0.04 | 455.05 ± 91.23 | 608.27 ± 80.86 |
| A. microdictyon | 0.09 ± 0.06 | 0.06 ± 0.04 | 0.02 ± 0.01 | 0.04 ± 0.02 | 1.00 ± 0.04 | 1.00 ± 0.05 | 349.03 ± 89.14 | 710.96 ± 122.01 |
| A. ulleungense | 0.11 ± 0.08 | 0.09 ± 0.08 | 0.02 ± 0.01 | 0.04 ± 0.01 | 0.94 ± 0.07 | 0.93 ± 0.09 | 203.53 ± 56.48 | 366.94 ± 149.44 |
| A. thunbergii | 0.11 ± 0.06 | 0.10 ± 0.08 | 0.02 ± 0.01 | 0.04 ± 0.01 | 0.95 ± 0.07 | 0.94 ± 0.09 | 207.55 ± 51.41 | 358.65 ± 78.80 |
| var. terafolium | 0.11 ± 0.04 | 0.07 ± 0.05 | 0.02 ± 0.01 | 0.05 ± 0.01 | 1.00 ± 0.03 | 0.99 ± 0.04 | 303.28 ± 50.46 | 801.30 ± 157.57 |
| A. saccifolium | 0.04 ± 0.03 | 0.04 ± 0.04 | 0.01 ± 0.01 | 0.03 ± 0.01 | 0.98 ± 0.03 | 0.98 ± 0.04 | 428.57 ± 111.48 | 608.46 ± 80.55 |
| A. spirale | 0.08 ± 0.05 | 0.06 ± 0.04 | 0.02 ± 0.01 | 0.05 ± 0.02 | 1.00 ± 0.04 | 1.01 ± 0.05 | 240.26 ± 102.68 | 580.16 ± 155.20 |
| Chungrim-buchu | 0.16 ± 0.05 | 0.09 ± 0.05 | 0.02 ± 0.01 | 0.05 ± 0.01 | 0.98 ± 0.04 | 0.98 ± 0.04 | 431.67 ± 78.63 | 869.77 ± 112.08 |
| Greenbelt | 0.13 ± 0.04 | 0.05 ± 0.04 | 0.02 ± 0.01 | 0.04 ± 0.01 | 1.00 ± 0.03 | 1.00 ± 0.03 | 329.77 ± 82.32 | 683.26 ± 152.77 |
| Dume-buchu | 0.15 ± 0.04 | 0.07 ± 0.04 | 0.02 ± 0.01 | 0.04 ± 0.01 | 1.00 ± 0.03 | 1.00 ± 0.03 | 370.98 ± 73.26 | 691.09 ± 99.41 |
| Taxon | Moment Y Ratio | Perimeter (mm) | PhiRad Statistics Avg | PhiRad Statistics Min | PhiRad Statistics Max | Pointness |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Allium longistylum 1 | 0.70 ± 0.08 | 6.65 ± 0.72 | 0.48 ± 0.02 | 0.41 ± 0.03 | 0.54 ± 0.02 | 0.08 ± 0.05 |
| A. longistylum 2 | 0.67 ± 0.08 | 7.59 ± 0.64 | 0.48 ± 0.01 | 0.43 ± 0.02 | 0.54 ± 0.02 | 0.07 ± 0.04 |
| A. longistylum 3 | 0.66 ± 0.08 | 7.82 ± 0.77 | 0.48 ± 0.01 | 0.42 ± 0.03 | 0.54 ± 0.02 | 0.08 ± 0.05 |
| A. tuberosum | 0.71 ± 0.05 | 7.95 ± 0.36 | 0.48 ± 0.01 | 0.43 ± 0.02 | 0.53 ± 0.01 | 0.09 ± 0.04 |
| A. dumebuchum | 0.63 ± 0.07 | 8.06 ± 0.69 | 0.48 ± 0.01 | 0.42 ± 0.03 | 0.54 ± 0.02 | 0.10 ± 0.04 |
| A. anisopodium | 0.76 ± 0.07 | 7.09 ± 0.64 | 0.48 ± 0.01 | 0.40 ± 0.03 | 0.56 ± 0.02 | 0.11 ± 0.06 |
| A. taquaii | 0.86 ± 0.07 | 7.98 ± 0.62 | 0.48 ± 0.01 | 0.44 ± 0.03 | 0.52 ± 0.02 | 0.06 ± 0.03 |
| A. microdictyon | 0.70 ± 0.10 | 8.03 ± 0.64 | 0.48 ± 0.01 | 0.42 ± 0.02 | 0.53 ± 0.02 | 0.07 ± 0.03 |
| A. ulleungense | 0.76 ± 0.09 | 5.85 ± 0.97 | 0.46 ± 0.02 | 0.40 ± 0.03 | 0.54 ± 0.02 | 0.11 ± 0.07 |
| A. thunbergii | 0.76 ± 0.10 | 5.83 ± 0.59 | 0.47 ± 0.01 | 0.41 ± 0.03 | 0.54 ± 0.02 | 0.12 ± 0.07 |
| var. terafolium | 0.62 ± 0.07 | 8.18 ± 0.69 | 0.48 ± 0.01 | 0.42 ± 0.02 | 0.55 ± 0.02 | 0.09 ± 0.05 |
| A. saccifolium | 0.83 ± 0.11 | 7.89 ± 0.71 | 0.48 ± 0.01 | 0.44 ± 0.02 | 0.52 ± 0.02 | 0.06 ± 0.04 |
| A. spirale | 0.63 ± 0.08 | 7.04 ± 0.99 | 0.48 ± 0.01 | 0.42 ± 0.03 | 0.54 ± 0.02 | 0.08 ± 0.04 |
| Chungrim-buchu | 0.71 ± 0.07 | 8.96 ± 0.52 | 0.48 ± 0.01 | 0.41 ± 0.02 | 0.55 ± 0.02 | 0.09 ± 0.05 |
| Greenbelt | 0.70 ± 0.05 | 7.83 ± 0.89 | 0.48 ± 0.01 | 0.43 ± 0.02 | 0.55 ± 0.02 | 0.07 ± 0.04 |
| Dume-buchu | 0.73 ± 0.07 | 8.09 ± 0.59 | 0.49 ± 0.01 | 0.43 ± 0.02 | 0.55 ± 0.02 | 0.08 ± 0.04 |
References
- Yusupov, Z.; Ergashov, I.; Volis, S.; Makhmudjanov, D.; Dekhkonov, D.; Khassanov, F.; Tojibaev, K.; Deng, T.; Sun, H. Seed macro- and micromorphology in Allium (Amaryllidaceae) and its phylogenetic significance. Ann. Bot. 2022, 129, 869–911. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fenwick, G.R.; Hanley, A.B.; Whitaker, J.R. The genus allium–Part 1. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 1985, 22, 199–271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- The Angiosperm Phylogeny Group. An update of the Angiosperm Phylogeny Group classification for the orders and families of flowering plants: APG III. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 2009, 161, 105–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- The Angiosperm Phylogeny Group. An update of the Angiosperm Phylogeny Group classification for the orders and families of flowering plants: APG IV. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 2016, 181, 399–436.
- Korea National Arboretum. Checklist of Vascular Plants in Korea (Native Plants); Korea National Arboretum: Pocheon, Republic of Korea, 2020; pp. 582–584. (In Korean) [Google Scholar]
- National Institute of Biological Resources. Red Data Book of Republic of Korea Vol. 5. Vascular Plants, 2nd ed.; National Institute of Biological Resources: Incheon, Republic of Korea, 2021. [Google Scholar]
- Scarcelli, N.; Chaïr, H.; Causse, S.; Vesta, R.; Couvreur, T.L.P. Crop wild relative conservation: Wild yams are not that wild. Biol. Conserv. 2017, 210, 325–333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kole, C. Wild Crop Relatives: Genomic and Breeding Resources; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2011. [Google Scholar]
- Warschefsky, E.; Penmetsa, R.V.; Cook, D.R.; Wettberg, E.J.B. Back to the wilds: Tapping evolutionary adaptations for resilient crops through systematic hybridization with crop wild relatives. Am. J. Bot. 2014, 101, 1791–1800. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Chen, J.; Huang, Q.; Gao, D.; Wang, J.; Lang, Y.; Liu, T.; Li, B.; Bai, Z.; Luis Goicoechea, J.; Liang, C.; et al. Whole-genome sequencing of Oryza brachyantha reveals mechanisms underlying Oryza genome evolution. Nat. Commun. 2013, 4, 1595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bolger, A.; Scossa, F.; Bolger, M.E.; Lanz, C.; Maumus, F.; Tohge, T.; Quesneville, H.; Alseekh, S.; Sorensen, I.; Lichtenstein, G.; et al. The genome of the stress-tolerant wild tomato species Solanum pennellii. Nat. Genet. 2014, 46, 1034–1038. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Brozynska, M.; Furtado, A.; Henry, R.J. Genomics of crop wild relatives: Expanding the gene pool for crop improvement. Plant Biotechnol. J. 2015, 14, 1070–1085. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Dempewolf, H.; Eastwood, R.J.; Guarino, L.; Khoury, C.K.; Müller, J.V.; Toll, J. Adapting agriculture to climate change: A global initiative to collect, conserve, and use crop wild relatives. Agroecol. Sustain. Food 2014, 38, 369–377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Phillips, J.; Kyratzis, A.; Christoudoulou, C.; Kell, S.; Maxted, N. Development of a national crop wild relative conservation strategy for Cyprus. Genet. Resour. Crop Evol. 2014, 61, 817–827. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jagn, J.E.; Baasanmunkh, S.; Nyamgerel, N.; Oh, S.Y.; Song, J.H.; Yusupov, Z.; Tojibaev, K.; Choi, H.J. Flower morphology of Allium (Amaryllidaceae) and its systematic significance. Plant Divers. 2024, 46, 3–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wrońska-Pilarek, D.; Halbritter, H.; Krzymińska, A.; Bednorz, L.; Bocianowski, J. Pollen morphology of selected European species of the genus Allium L. (Alliaceae). Acta Sci. Pol. 2016, 15, 65–84. [Google Scholar]
- Heidarian, M.; Hamdi, S.M.M.; Dehshiri, M.M.; Nejadsattari, T.; Masoumi, S.M. Taxonomical investigation on some species of genus Allium based on the pollen morphology. Annu. Res. Rev. Biol. 2019, 32, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Khorasani, M.; Saeidi Mehrvarz, S.; Zarre, S. Bulb tunic anatomy and its taxonomic implication in Allium L. (Amaryllidaceae: Allioideae). Plant Biosystems. 2018, 152, 1311–1328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Celep, F.; Koyunu, M.; Fritsch, R.M.; Kahraman, A.; Doğan, M. Taxonomic importance of seed morphology in Aliium (Amaryllidaceae). Syst. Bot. 2012, 34, 893–912. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Choi, H.J.; Oh, B.Y. A partial revision of Allium (Amaryllidaceae) in Korea and north-eastern China. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 2011, 167, 153–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shukherdorj, B.; Jang, J.E.; Duchoslav, M.; Choi, H.J. Cytotype distribution and ecology of Allium thunbergii (=A. sacculiferum) with a special reference to South Korean populations. Korean J. Plant Taxon. 2018, 48, 278–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Choi, H.J.; Yang, S.; Yang, J.C.; Friesen, N. Allium ulleungense (Amaryllidaceae), a new species endemic to Ulleungdo Island, Korea. Korean J. Plant Taxon. 2019, 49, 294–299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jang, J.E.; Park, J.S.; Jung, J.Y.; Kim, D.K.; Yang, S.; Choi, H.J. Notes on Allium section Rhizirideum (Amaryllidaceae) in South Korea and northeastern China: With a new species from Ulleungdo Island. PhytoKeys 2021, 176, 1–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Martin, R.P.; Carranza, N.L.; LaVine, R.J.; Lieberman, B.S. Morphological evolution during the last hurrah of the trilobites: Morphometric analysis of the Devonian asteropyginid trilobites. Paleobiology 2023, 49, 296–312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Smolinski, S.; Schade, F.M.; Berg, F. Assessing the performance of statistical classifiers to discriminate fish stocks using Fourier analysis of otolith shape. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 2020, 77, 674–683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Neto, J.C.; Meyer, G.E.; Jones, D.D.; Samal, A.K. Plant species identification using Elliptic Fourier leaf shape analysis. Comput. Electron. Agric. 2006, 50, 121–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Firmansyah, Z.; Herdiyeni, Y.; Silalahi, B.P.; Douady, S. Landmark Analysis of Leaf Shape Using Polygonal Approximation. IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci. 2016, 31, 012018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chemisquy, M.A.; Prevosti, F.J.; Morrone, O. Seed morphology in the tribe Chloraeeae (Orchidaceae): Combining traditional and geometric morphometrics. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 2009, 160, 171–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Savriama, Y. A step-by-step guide for geometric morphometrics of floral symmetry. Front. Plant Sci. 2018, 9, 1433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Fritsch, R.; Kruse, J.; Adler, K.; Rutten, T. Testa sculptures in Allium L. subg. Melanocrommyun (Webb & Berthel.) Rouy (Alliaceae). Feddes Repert. 2006, 117, 250–263. [Google Scholar]
- Elisens, W.J. The systematic significance of seed coat anatomy among new world species of tribe Antirrhineae (Scrophulariaceae). Syst. Bot. 1985, 10, 282–299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ghimire, B.; Jeong, M.J.; Choi, G.E.; Lee, H.; Suk, G.U. Seed morphology of the subfamily Helleboroideae (Ranunculaceae) and its systematic implication. Flora 2015, 216, 6–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ghimire, B.; Jeong, M.J.; Suh, G.U.; Heo, K.; Lee, C.H. Seed morphology and seed coat anatomy of Fraxinus, Ligustrum and Syringa (Oleeae: Oleaceae) and its systematic implications. Nord. J. Bot. 2018, 36, e01866. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Murley, M.R. Seeds of the Cruciferae of Northeastern North America. Am. Midl. Nat. 1951, 46, 1–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Harris, J.G.; Harris, M.W. (Eds.) Part 2: Terminology by category In Plant Identification Terminology: An Illustrated Glossary, 2nd ed.; University of Colorado: Colorado, USA, 2004; pp. 164–171. [Google Scholar]
- Wolfe, L.M. The genetics and ecology of seed size variation in a biennial plant, Hydrophyllum appendiculatum (Hydrophyllaceae). Oecologia 1995, 101, 343–352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Harper, J.L.; Lovell, P.H.; Moore, K.G. The shapes and sizes of seeds. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 1970, 1, 327–356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fenner, M. Environmental influences of seed size and composition. Hortic. Rev. 1993, 13, 183–213. [Google Scholar]
- Dana, W.; Ivo, W. Computer image analysis of seed shape and seed color for flax cultivar description. Comput. Electron. Agric. 2008, 61, 126–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Atis, I.; Atak, M.; Can, E.; Mavi, K. Seed coat color effects on seed quality and salt tolerance of Red Clover (Trifolium pretense). Int. J. Agric. Biol. 2011, 13, 363–368. [Google Scholar]
- Bassanmunkh, S.; Lee, J.K.; Jang, J.E.; Park, M.S.; Friesen, N.; Chung, S.; Choi, H.J. Seed morphology of Allium L. (Amaryllidaceae) from Central Asian countries and its taxonomic implications. Plants 2020, 9, 1239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Bhattarai, B.; Nuttall, J.G.; Walker, C.K.; Wallace, A.J.; Fitzgerald, G.J.; O’Leary, G.J. An explanatory model of red lentil seed coat colour to manage degradation in quality during storage. Agronomy 2024, 14, 373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Elliptic Fourier analysis of leaf shape in southern African Strychonos section Densiflorae (Loganiaceae). Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 2012, 170, 542–553. [CrossRef]
- Luo, T.; Zhao, J.; Gu, Y.; Zhang, S.; Qiao, X.; Tian, W.; Han, Y. Classification of weed seeds based on visual images and deep learning. Inf. Process. Agric. 2023, 10, 41–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chu, Y.R.; Jo, M.S.; Kim, G.E.; Park, C.H.; Lee, D.J.; Che, S.H.; Na, C.S. Non-desstructive seed viability assessment via multispectral imaging and stacking ensemble learning. Agriculture 2024, 14, 1679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rahn, K. Alliaceae. In The Families and Genera of Vascular Plants–Volume III: Flowering Plants Monocotyledons Lilianae (Except Orchidaceae); Kubitzki, K., Ed.; Springer: Berlin, Germany, 1998; pp. 70–78. [Google Scholar]
- Corner, E.J.H. The Seeds of Dicotyledons; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 1976; pp. 8–24. [Google Scholar]
- Galati, B.G.; Gotelli, M.M.; Dolinko, A.E.; Rosenfeldt, S. Could microechinate orbicules be related to the release of pollen in anemophilous and ‘buzz pollination’ species? Aust. J. Bot. 2018, 67, 16–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schenk, J.J.; Sullivan, M.T.; Washburn, G.A.; Franta, R.C.; Chambers, M.L. Allometric relationships better explain seed coat microsculpture traits in Mentzelia section Bartonia (Loasaceae) than ecology or dispersal. Int. J. Plant Sci. 2016, 177, 263–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Finch-Savage, W.E.; Phelps, K. Onion (Allium cepa L.) Seedling emergence patterns can be explained by the influence of soil temperature and water potential on seed germination. J. Exp. Bot. 1993, 44, 407–414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hwang, H.S.; Hwang, J.H.; Yun, J.H.; Hwang, S.Y.; Park, J.E.; Oh, H.E.; Lee, S.J.; Park, J.M.; Hwang, S.J. Seed and germination Characteristics of Allium koreanum H.J. Choi & B.U. Oh for effective propagation. J. Bio-Environ. Control 2023, 32, 359–365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sakata, T.; Shiratsuchi, K.; Kawabata, S.; Tagawa, A. Initial water absorption characteristics and volume changes at different deterioration levels in Welsh Onion seed (Allium fistullosum L.). Environ. Control Biol. 2009, 47, 167–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Finch-Savage, W.E.; Leubner-Metzger, G. Seed dormancy and the control of germination. New Phytol. 2006, 171, 501–523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tagimanova, D.; Raiser, O.; Danilova, A.; Turzhanova, A.; Khapilina, O. Micropropagation of rare endemic species Allium microdictyon Prokh. threatened in Kazakhstani Altai. Horticulturae 2024, 10, 943–956. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, Q.Q.; Zhou, S.D.; He, X.J.; Yu, Y.; Zhang, Y.C.; Wei, X.Q. Phylogeny and biogeography of Allium (Amaryllidaceae: Allieae) based on nuclear ribosomal internal transcribed spacer and chloroplast rps16 sequences, focusing on the inclusion of species endemic to China. Ann. Bot. 2010, 106, 709–733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Choi, H.J.; Giussani, M.L.; Jang, C.G.; Oh, B.U.; Cota-Sáncehz, J.H. Systematics of disjunct northeastern Asian and northern North American Allium (Amaryllidaceae). Botany 2012, 90, 491–508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- GRIN-Global USDA National Plant Germplasm System. Available online: https://npgsweb.ars-grin.gov/gringlobal/taxon/cwrcropdetail?id=63&type=crop (accessed on 10 December 2025).
- Yamashita, K.; Tsukazaki, H.; Kojima, A. Interspecific hybrids between amphimictic diploid Chinese Chive (Allium ramosum L.) and A. scabriscapum Bois. et Ky. J. Jpn. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 2005, 74, 127–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chuda, A.; Adamus, A. Aspects of interspecific hydridization within edible Alliaceae. Acta Physiol. Plant. 2009, 31, 223–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- IEC 61966-2-1:1999/AMD1:2003; Multimedia Systems and Equipment–Colour Measurement and Management–Part 2-1: Colour Management–Default RGB Colour Space–sRGB. International Electrotechnical Commission: Geneva, Switzerland, 2003.
- Bonhomme, V.; Picq, S.; Gaucherel, C.; Claude, J. Momocs: Outline Analysis Using R. J. Stat. Softw. 2014, 56, 1–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rohlf, F.; Archie, J. A comparison of Fourier Methods for the Description of Wing Shape in Mosquitoes (Diptera: Culicidae). Syst. Biol. 1984, 33, 302–317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zahn, C.T.; Roskies, R.Z. Fourier Descriptors for Plane Closed Curves. IEEE Trans. Comput. 1972, 21, 269–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Renaud, S.; Michaux, J.R. Adaptive latitudinal trends in the mandible shape of Apodemus wood mice. J. Biogeogr. 2003, 30, 1617–1628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hickey, M.; King, C. 8. Hairs and Scales In The Cambridge Illustrated Glossary of Botanical Terms; Hickey, M., King, C., Eds.; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2005; pp. 113–117. [Google Scholar]
- Lê, S.; Josse, J.; Husson, F. FactoMineR: A Package for Multivariate Analysis. J. Stat. Softw. 2008, 25, 1–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dray, S.; Dufour, A. The ade4 package: Implementing the duality diagram for ecologists. J. Stat. Softw. 2007, 22, 1–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Paradis, E.; Schliep, K. ape 5.0: An environment for modern phylogenetics and evolutionary analysis in R. Bioinformatics 2019, 35, 526–528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schlip, K. Phangorn: Phylogenetic analysis in R. Bioinformatics 2011, 27, 592–593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Thomas, G.H.; Freckleton, R.P. MOTMOT: Models of trait macroevolution on trees. Methods Ecol. Evol. 2012, 3, 145–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]









| H | Beta | Rec | Skew | Kurt | Rad Avg | Point Ness | Comp Eclipse | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| a | b | x | y | x | y | ||||||
| A. longistylum 1–2 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| A. longistylum 2–3 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| A. longistylum 1–3 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| A. anisopodium 1–2 | - | - | ** | - | - | - | * | * | - | - | ** |
| x-axis | df | Wilks | Approx. F | Num Df | Den Df | Pr (>F) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| taxa | 13 | 0.058755 | 24.862 | 221 | 17505 | <2.2 × 10−16 *** |
| Residuals | 1699 | |||||
| y-axis | ||||||
| taxa | 13 | 0.071127 | 32.882 | 156 | 14811 | <2.2 × 10−16 *** |
| Residuals | 1675 | |||||
| z-axis | ||||||
| taxa | 13 | 0.25803 | 4.7473 | 507 | 20763 | <2.2 × 10−16 *** |
| Residuals | 1715 |
| Taxa | Length | Taxon | Length |
|---|---|---|---|
| A. tuberosum | ce 1.01 ± 0.25 | A. thunbergii | e 1.08 ± 0.22 |
| A. spirale | bc 0.95 ± 0.18 | A. thunbergii var. teretifolium | f 1.31 ± 0.34 |
| A. sacculiferum | a 0.79 ± 0.18 | A. anisopodium | a 0.71 ± 0.17 |
| A. taquetii | bc 0.95 ± 0.20 | A. ulleungense | Absent |
| A. dumebuchum | a 0.72 ± 0.15 | A. microdictyon | Absent |
| A. longistylum 1 | a 0.76 ± 0.21 | Chungrim-buchu | ce 1.04 ± 0.27 |
| A. longistylum 2 | b 0.91 ± 0.20 | Dume-buchu | bc 0.95 ± 0.23 |
| A. longistylum 3 | bc 0.93 ± 0.22 | Greenbelt | g 1.44 ± 0.34 |
| Species | Bank No. | Date | Region |
|---|---|---|---|
| Allium anisopodium Ledeb. | 2021-006804 | 14 November 2021 | Okdo-myeon, Gunsan-si, Jeollabuk-do, Korea Republic |
| A. dumebuchum H.J.Choi | 2021-006822 | 2021 | Subi-myeon, Yeongyang-gun, Gyeongsangbuk-do, Korea Republic |
| A. longistylum Baker | 2021-006773 | 3 November 2021 | Galmal-eup, Cheolwon-gun, Gangwon-do, Korea Republic |
| 2021-006832 | 25 October 2021 | Dongsong-eup, Cheolwon-gun, Gangwon-do, Korea Republic | |
| 2021-006833 | 25 October 2021 | Gunnam-myeon, Yeoncheon-gun, Gyeonggi-do, Korea Republic | |
| A. microdictyon Prokh. | 2021-006513 | 2021 | Punggi-eup, Yeongju-si, Gyeongsangbuk-do, Korea Republic |
| A. sacculiferum Maxim. | 2019-008952 | 9 October 2019 | Gogae-myeon, Geochang-gun, Gyeongsangnam-do, Korea Republic |
| A. spirale Willd. | 2021-006539 | 2 November 2021 | Gangmun-dong, Gangneung-si, Gangwon-do, Korea Republic |
| A. taquetii H.Lév. & Vaniot | 2021-006802 | 31 October 2021 | Saekdal-dong, Seogyipo-si, Jeju-do, Korea Republic |
| A. thunbergii G.Don | 2020-040355 | 14 October 2020 | Ganseong-eup, Gosung-gun, Gangwon-do, Korea Republic |
| A. thunbergii var. teretifolium H.J.Choi & B.U.Oh | 2018-012360 | 22 October 2018 | Macheon-myeon, Hamyang-gun, Gyeongsangnam-do, Korea Republic |
| A. tuberosum Rottler ex Spreng. | 2021-006775 | 1 October 2021 | Shindong-eup, Jeongseon-gun, Gangwon-do, Korea Republic |
| A. ulleungense H.J.Choi & N.Friesen | 2021-005218 | 22 June 2021 | Ulleung-eup, Ulleung-gun, Gyeongsangbuk-do, Korea Republic |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.
Share and Cite
Jo, M.S.; Kim, J.E.; Chu, Y.R.; Chung, G.Y.; Na, C.S. Morphology of Chinese Chive and Onion (Allium; Amaryllidaceae) Crop Wild Relatives: Taxonomical Relations and Implications. Plants 2026, 15, 192. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants15020192
Jo MS, Kim JE, Chu YR, Chung GY, Na CS. Morphology of Chinese Chive and Onion (Allium; Amaryllidaceae) Crop Wild Relatives: Taxonomical Relations and Implications. Plants. 2026; 15(2):192. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants15020192
Chicago/Turabian StyleJo, Min Su, Ji Eun Kim, Ye Rin Chu, Gyu Young Chung, and Chae Sun Na. 2026. "Morphology of Chinese Chive and Onion (Allium; Amaryllidaceae) Crop Wild Relatives: Taxonomical Relations and Implications" Plants 15, no. 2: 192. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants15020192
APA StyleJo, M. S., Kim, J. E., Chu, Y. R., Chung, G. Y., & Na, C. S. (2026). Morphology of Chinese Chive and Onion (Allium; Amaryllidaceae) Crop Wild Relatives: Taxonomical Relations and Implications. Plants, 15(2), 192. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants15020192

