Subtle but Significant: Intraspecific Genome Size Variation in Durum Wheat Landraces and Cultivars
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Plant Material
2.2. Sample Preparation
| Buffer | Chemical Composition |
|---|---|
| Sorbitol-Based Buffer (SBB) | 100 mM Tris-HCl; 0.35 M Sorbitol; 0.05 M glycine; 5 mM EDTA; 90 mM NaCl; 1% (w/v) Polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP-40); 0.5% (v/v) Tween 20; 0.1% (v/v) β-mercaptoethanol; 50 µg/mL RNAse; 50 µg/mL Propidium Iodide; pH 7.5 |
2.3. Flow Cytometry
2.4. Statistical Analyses
| No | Accession | Origin | 2C (pg) | Pisum CV% | Triticum CV% | Mbp |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ARI00007 | Cyprus | 25.99 ± 0.09 c–h | 2.48 ± 0.17 | 2.59 ± 0.25 | 25,416.86 ± 90.55 c–h |
| 2 | ARI00009 | Cyprus | 25.97 ± 0.06 c–i | 2.89 ± 0.67 | 2.78 ± 0.65 | 25,398.12 ± 54.68 c–i |
| 3 | ARI00015 | Cyprus | 25.96 ± 0.09 d–i | 2.35 ± 0.13 | 2.34 ± 0.05 | 25,385.49 ± 85.97 d–i |
| 4 | ARI00017 | Cyprus | 25.76 ± 0.02 g–l | 2.01 ± 0.32 | 2.31 ± 0.12 | 25,193.95 ± 19.54 g–l |
| 5 | ARI00027 | Cyprus | 25.87 ± 0.03 e–k | 2.54 ± 0.88 | 2.50 ± 0.68 | 25,300.45 ± 31.53 e–k |
| 6 | ARI00031 | Cyprus | 26.22 ± 0.05 b–d | 2.44 ± 0.22 | 2.13 ± 0.14 | 25,642.55 ± 51.54 b–d |
| 7 | ARI00048 | Cyprus | 26.26 ± 0.04 bc | 1.93 ± 0.08 | 2.02 ± 0.15 | 25,686.99 ± 41.75 bc |
| 8 | ARI00052 | Cyprus | 25.91 ± 0.07 e–j | 2.00 ± 0.17 | 2.30 ± 0.24 | 25,336.88 ± 70.17 e–j |
| 9 | ARI00053 | Cyprus | 25.70 ± 0.24 h–l | 2.64 ± 1.15 | 2.26 ± 0.17 | 25,131.20 ± 233.66 h–l |
| 10 | ARI00058 | Cyprus | 25.96 ± 0.09 d–i | 3.10 ± 0.98 | 2.89 ± 0.82 | 25,389.39 ± 92.24 d–i |
| 11 | ARI00067 | Cyprus | 26.31 ± 0.06 b | 2.60 ± 0.14 | 2.39 ± 0.06 | 25,734.98 ± 63.54 b |
| 12 | ARI00068 | Cyprus | 26.78 ± 0.03 a | 3.49 ± 0.34 | 2.84 ± 0.47 | 26,190.06 ± 25.41 a |
| 13 | ARI00070 | Cyprus | 26.17 ± 0.07 b–e | 2.22 ± 0.14 | 2.27 ± 0.31 | 25,591.57 ± 72.42 b–e |
| 14 | ARI00075 | Cyprus | 25.92 ± 0.04 e–j | 2.45 ± 0.55 | 2.29 ± 0.83 | 25,345.75 ± 36.49 e–j |
| 15 | ARI00077 | Cyprus | 26.22 ± 0.08 b–d | 3.35 ± 0.73 | 3.53 ± 0.33 | 25,642.18 ± 77.33 b–d |
| 16 | ARI00079 | Cyprus | 25.93 ± 0.02 d–j | 1.99 ± 0.21 | 2.24 ± 0.16 | 25,354.82 ± 21.97 d–j |
| 17 | ARI00086 | Cyprus | 25.97 ± 0.06 c–i | 1.91 ± 0.10 | 2.31 ± 0.09 | 25,403.18 ± 56.27 c–i |
| 18 | ARI00090 | Cyprus | 25.73 ± 0.08 g–l | 3.28 ± 0.44 | 2.96 ± 0.64 | 25,166.09 ± 77.63 g–l |
| 19 | ARI00093 | Cyprus | 25.86 ± 0.08 f–k | 2.66 ± 0.22 | 2.57 ± 0.11 | 25,295.40 ± 73.43 f–k |
| 20 | ARI00100 | Cyprus | 25.78 ± 0.09 f–l | 2.31 ± 0.20 | 2.11 ± 0.12 | 25,216.16 ± 91.60 f–l |
| 21 | ARI00101 | Cyprus | 25.84 ± 0.07 f–k | 2.08 ± 0.27 | 2.31 ± 0.05 | 25,273.90 ± 66.95 f–k |
| 22 | ARI00102 | Cyprus | 26.08 ± 0.03 b–f | 2.08 ± 0.14 | 1.95 ± 0.04 | 25,508.00 ± 30.08 b–f |
| 23 | ARI00105 | Cyprus | 26.00 ± 0.08 c–g | 1.93 ± 0.26 | 2.29 ± 0.26 | 25,430.27 ± 75.20 c–g |
| 24 | Atlas 1 | Greece | 25.76 ± 0.04g–l | 2.54 ± 0.18 | 2.51 ± 0.06 | 25,195.32 ± 34.65 g–l |
| 25 | Famira | Cyprus | 25.73 ± 0.09 g–l | 3.26 ± 0.64 | 3.83 ± 0.55 | 25,162.30 ± 85.71 g–l |
| 26 | Hekabe 1 | Cyprus | 25.93 ± 0.02 d–j | 2.52 ± 0.15 | 2.43 ± 0.17 | 25,357.16 ± 20.13 d–j |
| 27 | Icarda 1 (IG 97359) | Algeria | 25.75 ± 0.09 g–l | 2.65 ± 0.86 | 2.88 ± 0.80 | 25,187.69 ± 89.54 g–l |
| 28 | Icarda 2 (IG 126364) | Armenia | 25.65 ± 0.03 j–l | 2.68 ± 0.17 | 2.57 ± 0.07 | 25,085.39 ± 25.31 j–l |
| 29 | Icarda 3 (IG 96437) | Morocco | 25.74 ± 0.02 g–l | 2.44 ± 0.03 | 1.95 ± 0.08 | 25,175.06 ± 21.41 g–l |
| 30 | Icarda 4 (IG 98726) | Libya | 25.68 ± 0.03 i–l | 2.39 ± 0.05 | 2.25 ± 0.05 | 25,111.46 ± 32.83 i–l |
| 31 | Icarda 5 (IG 95789) | Syria | 25.79 ± 0.06 f–l | 2.76 ± 0.76 | 2.38 ± 0.79 | 25,226.87 ± 63.17 f–l |
| 32 | Icarda 6 (IG 84979) | Spain | 25.81 ± 0.06 f–k | 2.29 ± 0.05 | 2.18 ± 0.26 | 25,239.64 ± 56.12 f–k |
| 33 | Icarda 7 (IG 86653) | Israel | 25.89 ± 0.05 e–k | 2.31 ± 0.09 | 2.09 ± 0.03 | 25,315.85 ± 46.35 e–k |
| 34 | Icarda 8 (IG 97193) | Jordan | 25.88 ± 0.09 e–k | 2.47 ± 0.18 | 2.76 ± 0.47 | 25,313.55 ± 92.81 e–k |
| 35 | Icarda A(IG 85710) | Greece | 25.78 ± 0.09 g–l | 2.93 ± 0.60 | 2.88 ± 0.50 | 25,212.81 ± 83.69 g–l |
| 36 | Iride 1 | Italy | 25.65 ± 0.11 j–l | 3.85 ± 0.43 | 3.98 ± 0.46 | 25,086.83 ± 104.07 j–l |
| 37 | Josephina 1 | Cyprus | 25.63 ± 0.11 j–m | 3.24 ± 0.76 | 3.08 ± 0.79 | 25,065.43 ± 104.22 j–m |
| 38 | Kholina 1 | Cyprus | 25.63 ± 0.02 j–m | 2.82 ± 0.45 | 3.09 ± 0.07 | 25,065.45 ± 15.72 j–m |
| 39 | Kyperounta | Cyprus | 25.04 ± 0.01 o | 3.16 ± 0.18 | 2.92 ± 0.01 | 24,491.47 ± 5.83 o |
| 40 | MHA | Greece | 25.50 ± 0.12 l–n | 3.38 ± 0.08 | 4.24 ± 0.06 | 24,934.45 ± 116.88 l–n |
| 41 | MHM | Greece | 25.33 ± 0.20 m–o | 3.58 ± 0.29 | 3.88 ± 0.39 | 24,773.46 ± 193.17 m–o |
| 42 | Macedonia 1 | Cyprus | 25.82 ± 0.17 f–k | 3.16 ± 0.61 | 3.04 ± 0.29 | 25,252.19 ± 166.21 f–k |
| 43 | Mazotos 1 | Cyprus | 25.65 ± 0.07 j–l | 2.59 ± 0.27 | 2.80 ± 0.01 | 25,088.94 ± 64.98 j–l |
| 44 | Ourania 1 | Cyprus | 25.87 ± 0.27 e–k | 3.48 ± 1.66 | 3.28 ± 0.66 | 25,305.03 ± 261.41 e–k |
| 45 | Tripolitis Red | Cyprus | 25.34 ± 0.03 m–o | 2.93 ± 0.11 | 2.81 ± 0.15 | 24,779.64 ± 28.21 m–o |
| 46 | Tripolitis White | Cyprus | 25.20 ± 0.03 no | 3.16 ± 0.04 | 3.19 ± 0.19 | 24,642.26 ± 26.87 no |
| 47 | Vitron 1 | Spain | 25.60 ± 0.04 k–m | 2.49 ± 0.21 | 2.56 ± 0.05 | 25,040.53 ± 38.49 k–m |
| Average | 25.82 ± 0.28 | 2.68 ± 0.50 | 2.67 ± 0.57 | 25,258.27 ± 282.40 |
3. Results
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
Supplementary Materials
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- De Vita, P.; Taranto, F. Durum Wheat (Triticum turgidum ssp. durum) Breeding to Meet the Challenge of Climate Change. In Advances in Plant Breeding Strategies: Cereals; Al-Khayri, J.M., Jain, S.M., Johnson, D.V., Eds.; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2019; Volume 5, pp. 471–524. [Google Scholar]
- Xynias, I.N.; Mylonas, I.; Korpetis, E.G.; Ninou, E.; Tsaballa, A.; Avdikos, I.D.; Mavromatis, A.G. Durum wheat breeding in the Mediterranean region: Current status and future prospects. Agronomy 2020, 10, 432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Handmer, J.; Honda, Y.; Kundzewicz, Z.W.; Arnell, N.; Benito, G.; Hatfield, J.; Mohamed, I.F.; Peduzzi, P.; Wu, S.; Sherstyukov, B.; et al. Changes in Impacts of Climate Extremes: Human Systems and Ecosystems. In Managing the Risks of Extreme Events and Disasters to Advance Climate Change Adaptation: Special Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change; Field, C.B., Barros, V., Stocker, T.F., Dahe, Q., Eds.; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2012; pp. 231–290. [Google Scholar]
- Ainsworth, E.A.; Ort, D.R. How Do We Improve Crop Production in a Warming World? Plant Physiol. 2010, 154, 526–530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Peleg, Z.; Fahima, T.; Korol, A.B.; Abbo, S.; Saranga, Y. Genetic analysis of wheat domestication and evolution under domestication. J. Exp. Bot. 2011, 62, 5051–5061. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Salamini, F.; Özkan, H.; Brandolini, A.; Schäfer-Pregl, R.; Martin, W. Genetics and geography of wild cereal domestication in the near east. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2002, 3, 429–441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Simonetti, M.C.; Bellomo, M.P.; Laghetti, G.; Perrino, P.; Simeone, R.; Blanco, A. Quantitative trait loci influencing free-threshing habit in tetraploid wheats. Genet. Resour. Crop Evol. 1999, 46, 267–271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Simons, K.J.; Fellers, J.P.; Trick, H.N.; Zhang, Z.; Tai, Y.-S.; Gill, B.S.; Faris, J.D. Molecular Characterization of the Major Wheat Domestication Gene Q. Genetics 2006, 172, 547–555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Tanno, K.; Willcox, G. How Fast Was Wild Wheat Domesticated? Science 2006, 311, 1886. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Cheng, S.; Feng, C.; Wingen, L.U.; Cheng, H.; Riche, A.B.; Jiang, M.; Leverington-Waite, M.; Huang, Z.; Collier, S.; Orford, S.; et al. Harnessing landrace diversity empowers wheat breeding. Nature 2024, 632, 823–831. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Farbo, M.G.; Fadda, C.; Marceddu, S.; Conte, P.; Del Caro, A.; Piga, A. Improving the quality of dough obtained with old durum wheat using hydrocolloids. Food Hydrocoll. 2020, 101, 105467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Pasqualone, A.; Caponio, F.; Pagani, M.A.; Summo, C.; Paradiso, V.M. Effect of salt reduction on quality and acceptability of durum wheat bread. Food Chem. 2019, 289, 575–581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Doležel, J.; Greilhuber, J.; Suda, J. Estimation of nuclear DNA content in plants using flow cytometry. Nat. Protoc. 2007, 2, 2233–2244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Bennett, M.D.; Leitch, I.J. Plant Genome Size Research: A Field In Focus. Ann. Bot. 2005, 95, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Gregory, R.T. Preface: The Evolution of the Evolution of the Genome. In The Evolution of the Genome; Academic Press: Burlington, MA, USA, 2005; pp. vii–xi. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Slijepcevic, P. Genome dynamics over evolutionary time: “C-value enigma” in light of chromosome structure. Mutat. Res. Toxicol. Environ. Mutagen. 2018, 836, 22–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Ryan Gregory, T. Genome size and developmental complexity. Genetica 2002, 115, 131–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Francis, D.; Davies, M.S.; Barlow, P.W. A Strong Nucleotypic Effect on the Cell Cycle Regardless of Ploidy Level. Ann. Bot. 2008, 101, 747–757. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Greilhuber, J.; Leitch, I.J. Genome Size and the Phenotype. In Plant Genome Diversity Volume 2: Physical Structure, Behaviour and Evolution of Plant Genomes; Greilhuber, J., Dolezel, J., Wendel, J.F., Eds.; Springer: Vienna, Austria, 2013; pp. 323–344. [Google Scholar]
- Meyerson, L.A.; Pyšek, P.; Lučanová, M.; Wigginton, S.; Tran, C.-T.C.-T.; Cronin, J.T. Plant genome size influences stress tolerance of invasive and native plants via plasticity. Ecosphere 2020, 11, e03145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Cheng, H.; Liu, J.; Wen, J.; Nie, X.; Xu, L.; Chen, N.; Li, Z.; Wang, Q.; Zheng, Z.; Li, M.; et al. Frequent intra- and inter-species introgression shapes the landscape of genetic variation in bread wheat. Genome Biol. 2019, 20, 136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Bariah, I.; Keidar-Friedman, D.; Kashkush, K. Identification and characterization of large-scale genomic rearrangements during wheat evolution. PLoS ONE 2020, 15, e0231323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Walkowiak, S.; Gao, L.; Monat, C.; Haberer, G.; Kassa, M.T.; Brinton, J.; Ramirez-Gonzalez, R.H.; Kolodziej, M.C.; Delorean, E.; Thambugala, D.; et al. Multiple wheat genomes reveal global variation in modern breeding. Nature 2020, 588, 277–283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Li, T.; Kong, C.; Deng, P.; Li, C.; Zhao, G.; Li, H.; Gao, L.; Cui, D.; Jia, J. Intra-Varietal Diversity and Its Contribution to Wheat Evolution, Domestication, and Improvement in Wheat. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 10217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Brenchley, R.; Spannagl, M.; Pfeifer, M.; Barker, G.L.A.; D’Amore, R.; Allen, A.M.; McKenzie, N.; Kramer, M.; Kerhornou, A.; Bolser, D.; et al. Analysis of the bread wheat genome using whole-genome shotgun sequencing. Nature 2012, 491, 705–710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Özkan, H.; Tuna, M.; Kilian, B.; Mori, N.; Ohta, S. Genome size variation in diploid and tetraploid wild wheats. AoB Plants 2010, 2010, plq015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Maccaferri, M.; Harris, N.S.; Twardziok, S.O.; Pasam, R.K.; Gundlach, H.; Spannagl, M.; Ormanbekova, D.; Lux, T.; Prade, V.M.; Milner, S.G.; et al. Durum wheat genome highlights past domestication signatures and future improvement targets. Nat. Genet. 2019, 51, 885–895. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Nix, J.; Ranney, T.G.; Lynch, N.P.; Chen, H. Flow Cytometry for Estimating Plant Genome Size: Revisiting Assumptions, Sources of Variation, Reference Standards, and Best Practices. J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 2024, 149, 131–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Michael, K.; Andreou, C.; Markou, A.; Christoforou, M.; Nikoloudakis, N. A Novel Sorbitol-Based Flow Cytometry Buffer Is Effective for Genome Size Estimation across a Cypriot Grapevine Collection. Plants 2024, 13, 733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Kim, K.-M.; Baenziger, P.S.; Rybczynski, J.J.; Arumuganathan, K. Characterization of ploidy levels of wheat microspore-derived plants using laser flow cytometry. Vitr. Cell. Dev. Biol. Plant 2003, 39, 663–668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Kubaláková, M.; Kovářová, P.; Suchánková, P.; Cíhalíková, J.; Bartoš, J.; Lucretti, S.; Watanabe, N.; Kianian, S.F.; Doležel, J. Chromosome Sorting in Tetraploid Wheat and Its Potential for Genome Analysis. Genetics 2005, 170, 823–829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Eilam, T.; Anikster, Y.; Millet, E.; Manisterski, J.; Sagi-Assif, O.; Feldman, M. Genome size and genome evolution in diploid Triticeae species. Genome 2007, 50, 1029–1037. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Eilam, T.; Anikster, Y.; Millet, E.; Manisterski, J.; Feldman, M. Nuclear DNA amount and genome downsizing in natural and synthetic allopolyploids of the genera Aegilops and Triticum. Genome 2008, 51, 616–627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Ozkan, H.; Tuna, M.; Arumuganathan, K. Nonadditive Changes in Genome Size During Allopolyploidization in the Wheat (Aegilops-Triticum) Group. J. Hered. 2003, 94, 260–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Athinodorou, F.; Foukas, P.; Tsaniklidis, G.; Kotsiras, A.; Chrysargyris, A.; Delis, C.; Kyratzis, A.C.; Tzortzakis, N.; Nikoloudakis, N. Morphological diversity, genetic characterization, and phytochemical assessment of the cypriot tomato germplasm. Plants 2021, 10, 1698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Constandinou, S.; Nikoloudakis, N.; Kyratzis, A.C.C.; Katsiotis, A. Genetic diversity of Avena ventricosa populations along an ecogeographical transect in Cyprus is correlated to environmental variables. PLoS ONE 2018, 13, e0193885. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Tsolakidou, M.-D.; Markou, A.; Kyratzis, A.C.; Kotsiras, A.; Delis, C.; Mattas, K.; Katsiotis, A.; Nikoloudakis, N. Genomic and Phytochemical Diversity Across a Collection of Snake Melon Landraces. Plants 2025, 14, 2989. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Tsolakidou, M.-D.; Kyratzis, A.C.; Nikoloudakis, N. DArTseq Analysis of Cypriot Common Bean Germplasm Unveils an Assortment of Unexplored Genetic Variability. Plants 2025, 14, 3000. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Kyratzis, A.C.C.; Nikoloudakis, N.; Katsiotis, A. Genetic variability in landraces populations and the risk to lose genetic variation. The example of landrace “Kyperounda” and its implications for ex situ conservation. PLoS ONE 2019, 14, e0224255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Charalambous, I.; Ioannou, N.; Kyratzis, A.C.; Kourtellarides, D.; Hagidimitriou, M.; Nikoloudakis, N. Genome Size Variation across a Cypriot Fabeae Tribe Germplasm Collection. Plants 2023, 12, 1469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Tang, D.; Chen, M.; Huang, X.; Zhang, G.; Zeng, L.; Zhang, G.; Wu, S.; Wang, Y. SRplot: A free online platform for data visualization and graphing. PLoS ONE 2023, 18, e0294236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Doležel, J.; Bartoš, J.; Voglmayr, H.; Greilhuber, J.; Thomas, R.A. Nuclear DNA content and genome size of trout and human (multiple letters). Cytom. Part A 2003, 51, 127–129. [Google Scholar]
- Soni, A.; Henry, R.J. Re-calibration of flow cytometry standards for plant genome size estimation. Front. Plant Sci. 2025, 16, 1548766. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Adhikari, L.; Olivera, P.D.; Raupp, J.; Sela, H.; Distelfeld, A.; Maccaferri, M.; Bozzoli, M.; Mazzucotelli, E.; Brandolini, A.; Tuberosa, R.; et al. Dissecting the population structure, diversity and genetic architecture of rust resistance in wild emmer wheat (Triticum turgidum subsp. dicoccoides). BMC Genom. 2026, 27, 284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Bennett, M.D.; Leitch, I.J. Nuclear DNA amounts in angiosperms: Progress, problems and prospects. Ann. Bot. 2005, 95, 45–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Ozkan, H.; Levy, A.A.; Feldman, M. Allopolyploidy-induced rapid genome evolution in the wheat (Aegilops-Triticum) group. Plant Cell 2001, 13, 1735–1747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Bennett, M.D.; Leitch, I.J. Genome Size Evolution in Plants. In The Evolution of the Genome; Gregory, T.R., Ed.; Academic Press: Burlington, MA, USA, 2005; pp. 89–162. [Google Scholar]
- D’Ario, M.; Sablowski, R. Cell Size Control in Plants. Annu. Rev. Genet. 2019, 53, 45–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Royo, C.; Nazco, R.; Villegas, D. The climate of the zone of origin of Mediterranean durum wheat (Triticum durum Desf.) landraces affects their agronomic performance. Genet. Resour. Crop Evol. 2014, 61, 1345–1358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Royo, C.; Soriano, J.M.; Rufo, R.; Guzmán, C. Are the agronomic performance and grain quality characteristics of bread wheat Mediterranean landraces related to the climate prevalent in their area of origin? J. Cereal Sci. 2022, 105, 103478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Liu, Y.; Lin, Y.; Gao, S.; Li, Z.; Ma, J.; Deng, M.; Chen, G.; Wei, Y.; Zheng, Y. A genome-wide association study of 23 agronomic traits in Chinese wheat landraces. Plant J. 2017, 91, 861–873. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Doležel, J.; Kubaláková, M.; íhalíková, J.; Suchánková, P.; Šimková, H. Chromosome Analysis and Sorting Using Flow Cytometry. Methods Mol. Biol. 2011, 701, 221–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]



Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.
Share and Cite
Gökçebel, A.; Kyratzis, A.C.; Nikoloudakis, N. Subtle but Significant: Intraspecific Genome Size Variation in Durum Wheat Landraces and Cultivars. Plants 2026, 15, 2717. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants15172717
Gökçebel A, Kyratzis AC, Nikoloudakis N. Subtle but Significant: Intraspecific Genome Size Variation in Durum Wheat Landraces and Cultivars. Plants. 2026; 15(17):2717. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants15172717
Chicago/Turabian StyleGökçebel, Ahmet, Angelos C. Kyratzis, and Nikolaos Nikoloudakis. 2026. "Subtle but Significant: Intraspecific Genome Size Variation in Durum Wheat Landraces and Cultivars" Plants 15, no. 17: 2717. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants15172717
APA StyleGökçebel, A., Kyratzis, A. C., & Nikoloudakis, N. (2026). Subtle but Significant: Intraspecific Genome Size Variation in Durum Wheat Landraces and Cultivars. Plants, 15(17), 2717. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants15172717

