Establishment of a High-Frequency Plant Regeneration Protocol for the Multipurpose Handroanthus chrysanthus
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Results
2.1. Initial Aseptic Culture Establishment
2.2. Effect of Plant Growth Regulators on Shoot Regeneration from the Hypocotyls of H. chrysanthus
2.2.1. Effect of 6-BA and NAA on Shoot Regeneration
2.2.2. Effect of TDZ, 6-BA, and IBA Combinations on Shoot Regeneration
2.3. Effect of Light Spectra on Shoot Regeneration from the Hypocotyls of H. chrysanthus
2.4. Effects of Basal Media and Plant Growth Regulators on Shoot Regeneration from the Cotyledons of H. chrysanthus
2.5. Effect of 6-BA and GA3 on Shoot Proliferation
2.6. Rooting and Acclimatization of Micropropagated Seedlings
3. Discussion
4. Materials and Methods
4.1. Plant Material and Explant Preparation
4.2. Culture Media and Conditions
4.3. Adventitious Shoot Regeneration from Hypocotyls
4.4. Adventitious Shoot Regeneration from Cotyledons
4.5. Shoot Proliferation
4.6. Rooting and Acclimatization
4.7. Statistical Analysis
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Shang, X.; Liu, G.; Wu, Z.; Zhang, P. Combined transcriptomic and metabolomic analysis reveals the mechanism of flavonoid biosynthesis in Handroanthus chrysanthus (Jacq.) S.O.Grose. Forests 2022, 13, 1285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gentry, A.H. Bignoniaceae: Part II (tribe tecomeae). Flora Neotrop. 1992, 25, 1–370. [Google Scholar]
- Grose, S.O.; Olmstead, R.G. Taxonomic revisions in the polyphyletic genus Tabebuia s. l. (Bignoniaceae). Syst. Bot. 2007, 32, 660–670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Campos, T.S.; Pereira, V.M.; El Merzougui, S.; Beleski, D.; Pérez, H.E.; Pivetta, K.F.L.; Vendrame, W.A. Cryopreservation of Lavender Trumpet Tree (Handroanthus impetiginosus) Seeds. Horticulturae 2024, 10, 1256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Meng, J.; Zhang, Y.; Wei, Y.; Li, R.; Li, Z.; Zhong, C. Identification of Commercial Cultivars in the Tabebuia Alliance Using Genotyping-by-Sequencing. Forests 2023, 14, 271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, J.; Liao, S.B.; Sun, B.; Luo, S.X.; Chen, Y.; Shi, G.Z.; Zhang, K. Flowering phenology and flower morphology of Handroanthus chrysantha. J. Zhejiang A F Univ. 2017, 34, 759–764. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Héctor, M. Development of a protocol for the micropropagation of two forest species threatened with extinction in Ecuador. Plant Cell Tiss. Organ Cult. 2024, 159, 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- IUCN. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2021. Available online: https://www.iucnredlist.org/species/146784568/146784570 (accessed on 20 April 2026).
- Huang, X.M.; Yang, C.Q.; Chen, Z.H.; Chen, M.X.; Huang, Q.C.; Chen, K.W. Rapid loss of seed vigor and polyembryony phenomenon in Tabebuia chrysantha. Guangdong Agric. Sci. 2012, 39, 50–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, X.; Xu, G.; Cheng, C.; Lei, L.; Sun, J.; Xu, Y.; Deng, C.; Dai, Z.; Yang, Z.; Chen, X.; et al. Establishment of an Agrobacterium-mediated genetic transformation and CRISPR/Cas9-mediated targeted mutagenesis in Hemp (Cannabis sativa L.). Plant Biotechnol. J. 2021, 19, 1979–1987. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Koyama, J.; Morita, I.; Kino, A.; Tagahara, K. Micellar Electrokinetic Chromatography (MEKC) separation of furanonaphthoquinones from Tabebuia impetiginosa. Chem. Pharm. Bull. 2000, 48, 873–875. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Reis, F.P.; Bonfa, I.M.S.; Cavalcante, R.B.; Okoba, D.; Vasconcelos, S.B.S.; Candeloro, L.; Filiu, W.F.O.; Monreal, A.C.D.; Silva, V.J.; Santa Rita, P.H.; et al. Tabebuia aurea decreases inflammatory, myotoxic and hemorrhagic activities induced by the venom of Bothrops neuwiedi. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2014, 158, 352–357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- de Sousa, A.C.; de Oliveira, M.L.; Ferreira, J.L.; Rocha, N.H.; Honda, E.H.; Bogo, M.R. Effects of a Tabebuia avellanedae extract and lapachol on the labeling of blood constituents with technetium-99m. Sci. Res. Essays 2015, 10, 97–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, J.H.; Lee, S.M.; Myung, C.H.; Lee, K.R.; Hyun, S.M.; Lee, J.E.; Park, Y.S.; Jeon, S.R.; Park, J.I.; Chang, S.E.; et al. Melanogenesis inhibition of β-lapachone, a natural product from Tabebuia avellanedae, with effective in vivo lightening potency. Arch. Dermatol. Res. 2015, 307, 229–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- El-Hawary, S.S.; Taher, M.A.; Amin, E.; AbouZid, S.F.; Mohammed, R. Genus Tabebuia: A comprehensive review journey from past achievements to future perspectives. Arab. J. Chem. 2021, 14, 103046. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Freitas, A.E.; Moretti, M.; Budni, J.; Balen, G.O.; Fernandes, S.C.; Veronezi, P.O.; Heller, M.; Micke, G.A.; Pizzolatti, M.G.; Rodrigues, A.L.S. NMDA receptors and the L-arginine–nitric oxide–cyclic guanosine monophosphate pathway are implicated in the antidepressant-like action of the ethanolic extract from Tabebuia avellanedae in mice. J. Med. Food 2013, 16, 1030–1038. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Iwamoto, K.; Fukuda, Y.; Tokikura, C.; Noda, M.; Yamamoto, A.; Yamamoto, M.; Yamashita, M.; Zaima, N.; Iida, A.; Moriyama, T. The anti-obesity effect of taheebo (Tabebuia avellanedae Lorentz ex Griseb) extract in ovariectomized mice and the identification of a potential anti-obesity compound. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2016, 478, 1136–1140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Miranda, F.G.G.; Vilar, J.C.; Alves, I.A.N.; Cavalcanti, S.C.H.; Antoniolli, A.R. Antinociceptive and antiedematogenic properties and acute toxicity of Tabebuia avellanedae Lor. ex Griseb. inner bark aqueous extract. BMC Pharmacol. 2001, 1, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Panda, S.P.; Panigrahy, U.P.; Panda, S.; Jena, B.R. Stem extract of Tabebuia chrysantha induces apoptosis by targeting sEGFR in Ehrlich Ascites carcinoma. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2019, 235, 219–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Pires, T.C.S.P.; Dias, M.I.; Calhelha, R.C.; Carvalho, A.M.; Queiroz, M.J.R.P.; Barros, L.; Ferreira, I.C.F.R. Bioactive properties of Tabebuia impetiginosa-based phytopreparations and phytoformulations: A comparison between extracts and dietary supplements. Molecules 2015, 20, 22863–22871. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Duarte, E.; Sansberro, P.; Luna, C. Micropropagation of Handroanthus heptaphyllus (Vell.) Mattos from seedling explants. Afr. J. Biotechnol. 2016, 15, 1292–1298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Larraburu, E.E.; Apóstolo, N.M.; Llorente, B.E. In Vitro Propagation of Pink Lapacho: Response Surface Methodology and Factorial Analysis for Optimisation of Medium Components. Int. J. For. Res. 2012, 318258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Larraburu, E.E.; Yarte, M.E.; Llorente, B.E. Azospirillum brasilense inoculation, auxin induction and culture medium composition modify the profile of antioxidant enzymes during in vitro rhizogenesis of pink lapacho. Plant Cell Tiss. Organ Cult. 2016, 127, 381–392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Máximo, W.P.; Santos, B.R.; Martins, J.P.R.; Beijo, L.A.; Barbosa, S. Multiplication and in vitro rooting of Handroanthus impetiginosus (Mart. ex DC.) Mattos. Ciênc. Florest. 2020, 30, 658–668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zha, J.W.; Fang, H.T.; Deng, J.; Qin, F.Y.; Zhang, J.J.; Peng, C.C.; Zhao, X.L. Establishment of a rapid propagation system for Handroanthus impetiginosa ‘Zi Xiuqiu’. Mol. Plant Breed. 2023, 1–15. [Google Scholar]
- González-Rodríguez, J.A.; Ramírez-Garduza, F.; Robert, M.L.; O’Connor-Sánchez, A.; Peña-Ramírez, Y.J. Adventitious shoot regeneration from adult tissues of the tropical timber tree yellow Ipé primavera (Tabebuia donnell-smithii Rose [Bignoniaceae]). Vitr. Cell. Dev. Biol.-Plant 2010, 46, 411–421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Grira, M.; Prinsen, E.; Werbrouck, S.P.O. The Effect of Topophysis on the In Vitro Development of Handroanthus guayacan and on Its Metabolism of Meta-Topolin Riboside. Plants 2023, 12, 3577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Novikova, T.I.; Zaytseva, Y.G. TDZ-Induced Morphogenesis Pathways in Woody Plant Culture. In Thidiazuron: From Urea Derivative to Plant Growth Regulator; Ahmad, N., Faisal, M., Eds.; Springer: Singapore, 2018; pp. 25–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Elmoreigi, R.A. Effect of explant type and growth regulators on in vitro regeneration of apricot (Prunus armeniaca L.) Al-Amar rootstock. Plant Cell Tiss. Organ Cult. 2024, 160, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Murashige, T.; Skoog, F. A revised medium for rapid growth and bio-assays with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiol. Plant. 1962, 15, 473–497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gupta, P.K.; Durzan, D.J. Shoot multiplication from mature trees of Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii) and sugar pine (Pinus lambertiana). Plant Cell Rep. 1985, 4, 177–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Huang, H.; Wei, Y.; Zhai, Y.; Ouyang, K.; Chen, X.; Bai, L. High frequency regeneration of plants via callus-mediated organogenesis from cotyledon and hypocotyl cultures in a multipurpose tropical tree (Neolamarckia Cadamba). Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 4558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Dai, Q.C.; Li, N.; Lin, S.X.; Zhang, J.X. Differences in Callus Induction and Plant Regeneration of Neolamarckia cadamba from Different Geographical Provenances. Mol. Plant Breed. 2022, 1–13. Available online: https://link.cnki.net/urlid/46.1068.S.20220321.1327.011 (accessed on 20 April 2026).
- Wang, Y.; Wu, Z.; Li, X.; Shang, X. Regeneration and Genetic Transformation in Eucalyptus Species, Current Research and Future Perspectives. Plants 2024, 13, 2843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Cardoso, J.C.; Teixeira da Silva, J.A. Micropropagation of Zeyheria montana Mart. (Bignoniaceae), an endangered endemic medicinal species from the Brazilian cerrado biome. Vitr. Cell. Dev. Biol. Plant 2013, 49, 710–716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Erland, L.; Giebelhaus, R.; Victor, J.; Murch, S.; Saxena, P. The morphoregulatory role of thidiazuron: Metabolomics-guided hypothesis generation for mechanisms of activity. Biomolecules 2020, 10, 1253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Liu, Z.; Dai, X.; Li, J.; Liu, N.; Liu, X.; Li, S.; Xiang, F. The Type-B Cytokinin Response Regulator ARR1 Inhibits Shoot Regeneration in an ARR12-Dependent Manner in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 2020, 32, 2271–2291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Jones, M.; Cao, J.; O’Brien, R.; Murch, S.; Saxena, P. The mode of action of thidiazuron: Auxins, indoleamines, and ion channels in the regeneration of Echinacea purpurea L. Plant Cell Rep. 2007, 26, 1481–1490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Luo, Y.; Han, Y.; Wei, W.; Han, Y.; Yuan, J.; He, N. Transcriptome and metabolome analyses reveal the efficiency of in vitro regeneration by TDZ pretreatment in mulberry. Sci. Hortic. 2023, 310, 111678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ouyang, Y.; Chen, Y.; Lü, J.; Teixeira da Silva, J.A.; Zhang, X.; Ma, G. Somatic embryogenesis and enhanced shoot organogenesis in Metabriggsia ovalifolia W.T. Wang. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 24662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Han, J.; Li, Y.; Zhao, Y.; Sun, Y.; Li, Y.; Peng, Z. How does light regulate plant regeneration? Front. Plant Sci. 2025, 15, 1474431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Su, P.; Wang, D.; Wang, P.; Gao, Y.; Jia, H.; Hou, J.; Wu, L. In vitro regeneration, photomorphogenesis and light signaling gene expression in Hydrangea quercifolia cv. ‘Harmony’ under different LED environments. Planta 2024, 259, 71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Bhatnagar, A.; Singh, S.; Khurana, J.P.; Burman, N. HY5-COP1: The central module of light signaling pathway. J. Plant Biochem. Biotechnol. 2020, 29, 590–610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dai, X.; Wang, J.; Wang, L.; Liu, Z.; Li, Q.; Cai, Y.; Li, S.; Xiang, F. HY5 inhibits in vitro shoot stem cell niches initiation via directly repressing pluripotency and cytokinin pathways. Plant J. 2022, 110, 781–801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Chan, A.; Stasolla, C. Light induction of somatic embryogenesis in Arabidopsis is regulated by PHYTOCHROME E. Plant Physiol. Biotech. 2023, 195, 163–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Mira, M.M.; Day, S.; Ibrahim, S.; Hill, R.D.; Stasolla, C. The Arabidopsis Phytoglobin 2 mediates phytochrome B (phyB) light signaling responses during somatic embryogenesis. Planta 2023, 257, 88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Assou, J.; Bethge, H.; Wamhoff, D.; Winkelmann, T. Effect of cytokinins and light quality on adventitious shoot regeneration from leaflet explants of peanut (Arachis hypogaea). J. Hortic. Sci. Biotech. 2023, 98, 508–525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Burritt, D.J.; Leung, D.W.M. Adventitious shoot regeneration from Begonia × erythrophylla petiole sections is developmentally sensitive to light quality. Physiol. Plant. 2003, 118, 289–296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Loshyna, L.; Bulko, O.; Kuchuk, M. Adventitious regeneration of blackberry and raspberry shoots and the assessment of the LED-lighting impact. Zemdirb.-Agric. 2022, 109, 49–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, H.; Liu, H.; Wang, W.; Zu, Y. Effects of Thidiazuron, basal medium and light quality on adventitious shoot regeneration from in vitro cultured stem of Populus alba × P. berolinensis. J. For. Res. 2008, 19, 257–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Polivanova, O.B.; Bedarev, V.A. Hyperhydricity in Plant Tissue Culture. Plants 2022, 11, 3313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Werbrouck, S.P.O. Meta-topolin and Related Cytokinins as a Solution to Some In Vitro Problems. In Meta-Topolin: A Growth Regulator for Plant Biotechnology and Agriculture; Ahmad, N., Strnad, M., Eds.; Springer: Singapore, 2021; pp. 85–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jausoro, V.; Llorente, B.E.; Apóstolo, N.M. Structural differences between hyperhydric and normal in vitro shoots of Handroanthus impetiginosus (Mart. ex DC) Mattos (Bignoniaceae). Plant Cell Tiss. Organ Cult. 2010, 101, 183–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Grira, M. Strategies Towards Improved Micropropagation Protocols of Woody Plants: A Focus on Hyperhydricity Control, Topophysis, Culture Density and Cytokinin Metabolism. Ph.D. Thesis, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium, 2025. Available online: http://hdl.handle.net/1854/LU-01K5V9WVXR19MA79VDNCSPAA1V (accessed on 23 September 2025).
- Barua, R.; Igamberdiev, A.U.; Debnath, S.C. Hyperhydricity Syndrome in In Vitro Plants: Mechanisms, Physiology, and Control. Plants 2025, 14, 3721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]





| Treatment 0.1% HgCl2 (min) | Contamination Rate (%) | Germination Rate (%) |
|---|---|---|
| 6 | 21.75 ± 3.31 a | 72.20 ± 4.20 bc |
| 8 | 15.21 ± 2.45 b | 76.30 ± 1.69 ab |
| 10 | 10.20 ± 3.22 c | 86.32 ± 1.80 a |
| 12 | 8.20 ± 3.37 c | 84.32 ± 3.20 a |
| 14 | 8.07 ± 1.78 c | 78.20 ± 2.10 ab |
| 16 | 3.33 ± 0.50 d | 65.70 ± 3.51 c |
| Treatments | 6-BA (mg⋅L−1) | NAA (mg⋅L−1) | Callus Formation (%) | Shoot Regeneration (%) | Shoots per Explant |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SR1 | 3 | 0 | 59.31 ± 8.07 f | 8.10 ± 4.23 abc | 0.67 ± 0.33 ab |
| SR2 | 3 | 0.05 | 98.33 ± 2.89 ab | 14.26 ± 1.65 abc | 1.11 ± 0.19 ab |
| SR3 | 3 | 0.5 | 86.75 ± 4.86 cd | 7.90 ± 0.21 abc | 1.33 ± 0.58 a |
| SR4 | 5 | 0 | 66.77 ± 3.18 e | 6.36 ± 3.19 bc | 0.67 ± 0.58 ab |
| SR5 | 5 | 0.05 | 100.00 ± 0.00 a | 20.50 ± 3.21 a | 1.00 ± 0.00 ab |
| SR6 | 5 | 0.1 | 100.00 ± 0.00 a | 19.98 ± 5.54 ab | 1.11 ± 0.19 ab |
| SR7 | 5 | 0.2 | 100.00 ± 0.00 a | 16.38 ± 1.13 ab | 1.00 ± 0.00 ab |
| SR8 | 5 | 0.4 | 100.00 ± 0.00 a | 7.87 ± 3.96 abc | 0.67 ± 0.58 ab |
| SR9 | 5 | 0.5 | 79.87 ± 2.02 d | 3.33 ± 3.33 c | 0.33 ± 0.58 b |
| SR10 | 7 | 0.05 | 100.00 ± 0.00 a | 16.03 ± 3.31 ab | 1.00 ± 0.00 ab |
| SR11 | 7 | 0.1 | 95.83 ± 7.22 ab | 10.83 ± 5.83 abc | 0.67 ± 0.58 ab |
| SR12 | 7 | 0.2 | 91.07 ± 7.79 bc | 8.33 ± 4.17 abc | 0.67 ± 0.58 ab |
| SR13 | 7 | 0.4 | 100.00 ± 0.00 a | 10.83 ± 5.83 abc | 0.67 ± 0.58 ab |
| Treatments | 6-BA (mg⋅L−1) | TDZ (mg⋅L−1) | IBA (mg⋅L−1) | Callus Formation (%) | Shoot Regeneration (%) | Shoots per Explant |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SI1 | 0 | 0.2 | 0.5 | 100.00 ± 0.00 a | 15.08 ± 0.79 bcd | 0.67 ± 0.578 ab |
| SI2 | 0.5 | 0.2 | 0.5 | 100.00 ± 0.00 a | 15.74 ± 7.91 bcd | 1.22 ± 0.19 a |
| SI3 | 1 | 0.2 | 0.5 | 100.00 ± 0.00 a | 29.37 ± 7.57 b | 1.00 ± 1.00 ab |
| SI4 | 1.5 | 0.5 | 0.3 | 79.33 ± 5.10 c | 8.46 ± 4.33 d | 0.67 ± 0.58 ab |
| SI5 | 1.5 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 100.00 ± 0.00 a | 17.50 ± 2.50 bcd | 0.67 ± 0.58 ab |
| SI6 | 1.5 | 1 | 0.3 | 100.00 ± 0.00 a | 3.33 ± 3.33 d | 0.33 ± 0.58 b |
| SI7 | 1.5 | 1 | 0.5 | 100.00 ± 0.00 a | 14.44 ± 5.30 bcd | 1.00 ± 1.00 ab |
| SI8 | 1.5 | 2 | 0.3 | 100.00 ± 0.00 a | 4.76 ± 4.76 d | 0.33 ± 0.58 b |
| SI9 | 1.5 | 2 | 0.5 | 92.80 ± 6.46 b | 12.12 ± 6.06 bcd | 1.00 ± 0.00 ab |
| SI10 | 1.5 | 3 | 0.3 | 82.22 ± 5.88 c | 10.74 ± 6.43 cd | 0.33 ± 0.58 b |
| SI11 | 1.5 | 3 | 0.5 | 100.00 ± 0.00 a | 6.06 ± 3.03 d | 0.67 ± 0.58 ab |
| SI12 | 3 | 0.2 | 0.5 | 100.00 ± 0.00 a | 30.00 ± 0.00 b | 1.28 ± 0.25 a |
| SI13 | 5 | 0.2 | 0.5 | 100.00 ± 0.00 a | 51.79 ± 10.91 a | 2.22 ± 0.47 a |
| Light Spectrum | Callus Induction Rate (%) | Shoot Regeneration Rate (%) | Shoots per Explant |
|---|---|---|---|
| White LED | 100.00 ± 0 | 51.79 ± 9.94 a | 2.20 ± 0.20 a |
| Red | 100.00 ± 0 | 6.67 ± 5.78 b | 0.67 ± 0.58 b |
| Green | 100.00 ± 0 | 0 ± 0 c | 0 ± 0 c |
| Blue | 100.00 ± 0 | 10.00 ± 0 b | 1.00 ± 0 b |
| Treatments | 6-BA (mg⋅L−1) | NAA (mg⋅L−1) | Callus Formation (%) | Shoot Regeneration (%) | Shoots per Explant |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DC1 | 3 | 0.05 | 100.00 ± 0.00 a | 0.00 ± 0.00 b | 0.00 ± 0.00 c |
| DC2 | 3 | 0.3 | 100.00 ± 0.00 a | 10.87 ± 3.07 a | 1.33 ± 0.58 a |
| DC3 | 3 | 0.5 | 100.00 ± 0.00 a | 0.00 ± 0.00 b | 0.00 ± 0.00 c |
| DC4 | 5 | 0.05 | 91.11 ± 1.92 ab | 25.00 ± 5.88 a | 1.08 ± 0.95 ab |
| DC5 | 5 | 0.3 | 86.11 ± 7.34 b | 0.00 ± 0.00 b | 0.00 ± 0.00 c |
| DC6 | 5 | 0.5 | 100.00 ± 0.00 a | 0.00 ± 0.00 b | 0.00 ± 0.00 c |
| DC7 | 7 | 0.05 | 83.21 ± 7.60 b | 5.34 ± 4.64 ab | 0.67 ± 0.58 b |
| DC8 | 7 | 0.3 | 100.00 ± 0.00 a | 3.03 ± 5.25 ab | 0.33 ± 0.58 bc |
| DC9 | 7 | 0.5 | 89.68 ± 5.06 ab | 2.78 ± 4.81 ab | 0.33 ± 0.58 bc |
| Treatments | 6-BA (mg⋅L−1) | GA3 (mg⋅L−1) | Adventitious Bud Induction Rate (%) | Proliferation Co-Efficiency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SP1 | 2 | 0.1 | 85.35 ± 2.81 ab | 2.16 ± 0.17 c |
| SP2 | 3 | 0.1 | 66.67 ± 4.81 cd | 2.50 ± 0.08 bc |
| SP3 | 4 | 0.1 | 80.56 ± 2.78 abc | 2.56 ± 0.19 bc |
| SP4 | 2 | 0.3 | 70.45 ± 6.48 bc | 2.35 ± 0.44 bc |
| SP5 | 3 | 0.3 | 52.27 ± 11.67 de | 2.71 ± 0.02 b |
| SP6 | 4 | 0.3 | 91.67 ± 0.00 a | 3.27 ± 0.05 a |
| SP7 | 2 | 0.5 | 77.88 ± 6.56 abc | 2.20 ± 0.21 c |
| SP8 | 3 | 0.5 | 51.26 ± 3.77 e | 2.68 ± 0.14 b |
| SP9 | 4 | 0.5 | 41.67 ± 4.81 e | 2.56 ± 0.13 b |
| Treatments | NAA (mg⋅L−1) | IBA (mg⋅L−1) | Rooting Percentage (%) | Root Length (cm) | Root Number/Plant |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 | 0 | 3 | 27.78 ± 5.56 def | 1.83 ± 1.04 de | 1.33 ± 1.00 bc |
| R2 | 0 | 5 | 33.33 ± 9.62 cde | 3.12 ± 0.33 bcd | 5.44 ± 3.15 ab |
| R3 | 0 | 10 | 33.33 ± 0.00 cde | 4.56 ± 2.87 ab | 2.75 ± 2.54 abc |
| R4 | 0 | 15 | 8.33 ± 8.33 f | 0.63 ± 1.10 e | 0.67 ± 1.16 c |
| R5 | 0.01 | 3 | 66.67 ± 9.62 ab | 3.27 ± 1.77 bcd | 3.66 ± 1.94 abc |
| R6 | 0.01 | 5 | 33.33 ± 8.33 cde | 2.41 ± 1.97 cd | 3.66 ± 2.08 abc |
| R7 | 0.01 | 10 | 38.89 ± 5.56 cd | 2.62 ± 2.08 cd | 3.38 ± 3.39 abc |
| R8 | 0.01 | 15 | 55.56 ± 5.56 bc | 1.18 ± 0.25 de | 3.41 ± 1.66 abc |
| R9 | 0.05 | 3 | 33.33 ± 6.67 cde | 1.70 ± 1.44 de | 2.67 ± 2.02 bc |
| R10 | 0.05 | 5 | 40.00 ± 0.00 cd | 2.52 ± 1.43 cd | 1.50 ± 1.07 bc |
| R11 | 0.05 | 10 | 66.67 ± 6.67 ab | 5.27 ± 1.65 a | 3.97 ± 0.55 abc |
| R12 | 0.05 | 15 | 46.67 ± 6.67 bcd | 2.43 ± 1.21 cd | 7.28 ± 5.09 a |
| R13 | 0.5 | 3 | 50.00 ± 9.62 bcd | 3.27 ± 1.63 bcd | 1.75 ± 1.75 bc |
| R14 | 0.5 | 5 | 80.00 ± 11.54 a | 4.63 ± 1.31 ab | 1.93 ± 2.63 bc |
| R15 | 0.5 | 10 | 55.56 ± 9.55 bc | 3.92 ± 0.78 abc | 2.28 ± 0.25 bc |
| R16 | 0.5 | 15 | 66.67 ± 9.62 ab | 4.62 ± 1.09 ab | 1.98 ± 1.37 bc |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.
Share and Cite
Fang, H.; Chen, B.; Zhang, J.; Zha, J.; Xu, X.; Liu, Y.; Peng, C.; Zhao, X. Establishment of a High-Frequency Plant Regeneration Protocol for the Multipurpose Handroanthus chrysanthus. Plants 2026, 15, 2078. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants15132078
Fang H, Chen B, Zhang J, Zha J, Xu X, Liu Y, Peng C, Zhao X. Establishment of a High-Frequency Plant Regeneration Protocol for the Multipurpose Handroanthus chrysanthus. Plants. 2026; 15(13):2078. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants15132078
Chicago/Turabian StyleFang, Huiting, Bin Chen, Junjie Zhang, Jiwen Zha, Xinwen Xu, Yutong Liu, Changcao Peng, and Xiaolan Zhao. 2026. "Establishment of a High-Frequency Plant Regeneration Protocol for the Multipurpose Handroanthus chrysanthus" Plants 15, no. 13: 2078. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants15132078
APA StyleFang, H., Chen, B., Zhang, J., Zha, J., Xu, X., Liu, Y., Peng, C., & Zhao, X. (2026). Establishment of a High-Frequency Plant Regeneration Protocol for the Multipurpose Handroanthus chrysanthus. Plants, 15(13), 2078. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants15132078

