Comparative Analysis of Full-Length Reference Gene Stability in Phoebe zhennan Under Primary Abiotic and Biotic Stresses
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Results
2.1. Primer Specificity and Amplification Efficiency of Candidate Reference Genes
2.2. Expression Profiles and Abundance of 9 Candidate Reference Genes
2.3. Comprehensive Evaluation and Validation of Optimal Reference Genes
2.3.1. Delta Ct Analysis
2.3.2. GeNorm Analysis
2.3.3. NormFinder Analysis
2.3.4. BestKeeper Analysis
2.4. Comprehensive Stability Analysis of Reference Genes Using RefFinder
2.5. Validation of the Selected Reference Genes via Correlation Analysis of RNA-Seq and RT-qPCR Data
3. Discussion
4. Materials and Methods
4.1. Plant Materials and Experimental Design
4.2. RNA Isolation and cDNA Synthesis
4.3. Candidate Reference Gene Selection and Primer Verification
4.4. Reverse Transcription Quantitative Real-Time PCR (RT-qPCR) Assays
4.5. Statistical Evaluation of Gene Stability
4.6. Statistical Analyses
5. Conclusions
6. Patents
Supplementary Materials
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
Abbreviations
| 2−ΔΔCt | relative quantification method |
| ACT | actin |
| CDS | Coding sequences |
| Cq / Ct | Cycle threshold |
| CV | Coefficient of variation |
| CYP | cyclophilin |
| EF1α | Transcription elongation factor 1-alpha |
| HSP70 | heat shock protein 70 |
| MIQE | Minimum Information for Publication of Quantitative Real-Time PCR Experiments |
| NR | Non-redundant |
| P | probability value |
| PDA | Potato Dextrose Agar |
| RT-qPCR | Reverse transcription quantitative real-time PCR |
| R2 | coefficient of determination |
| SD | Standard deviation |
| STDEV | Standard deviation |
| TUB | β-tubulin |
| ΔCt | delta cycle threshold |
References
- Zeng, S.; Xie, T.; Shu, X.; Zhou, Z.; Yang, D.; Ma, H.; Li, X.; Chen, F.; Tian, L.; Shang, S. Evaluation of reference genes for accurate qRT-PCR normalization in bitter gourd across different tissues and stress conditions. BMC Plant Biol. 2025, 25, 1701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, Y.; Zhu, C.; Lin, Z.; Li, H.; Di, X.; Yue, X.; Gao, Z. Systematic identification and validation of the reference genes from 447 transcriptome datasets of moso bamboo (Phyllostachys edulis). Hortic. Plant J. 2024, 11, 1353–1363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kozera, B.; Rapacz, M. Reference genes in real-time PCR. J. Appl. Genet. 2013, 54, 391–406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Vandesompele, J.; De Preter, K.; Pattyn, F.; Poppe, B.; Van Roy, N.; De Paepe, A.; Speleman, F. Accurate normalization of real-time quantitative RT-PCR data by geometric averaging of multiple internal control genes. Genome Biol. 2002, 3, research0034.1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Gao, M.; Liu, Y.; Ma, X.; Shuai, Q.; Gai, J.; Li, Y. Evaluation of Reference Genes for Normalization of Gene Expression Using Quantitative RT-PCR under Aluminum, Cadmium, and Heat Stresses in Soybean. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0168965. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Guenin, S.; Mauriat, M.; Pelloux, J.; Van Wuytswinkel, O.; Bellini, C.; Gutierrez, L. Normalization of qRT-PCR data: The necessity of adopting a systematic, experimental conditions-specific, validation of references. J. Exp. Bot. 2009, 60, 487–493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xu, X.; Yang, Z.; Sun, X.; Zhang, L.; Fang, Z. Selection of reference genes for quantitative real-time PCR during flower bud development in CMS7311 of heading Chinese cabbage (Brassica rapa L. ssp. pekinensis). Acta Physiol. Plant. 2013, 36, 809–814. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, X.; Zhang, D.; Li, H.; Gao, B.; Yang, H.; Zhang, Y.; Wood, A.J. Characterization of reference genes for RT-qPCR in the desert moss Syntrichia caninervis in response to abiotic stress and desiccation/rehydration. Front. Plant Sci. 2015, 6, 38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yue, H.; Deng, P.; Liu, S.; Wang, M.; Song, W.; Nie, X. Selection and evaluation of reference genes for quantitative gene expression analysis in broomcorn millet (Panicum miliaceum L.). J. Plant Biol. 2016, 59, 435–443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ma, S.; Niu, H.; Liu, C.; Zhang, J.; Hou, C.; Wang, D. Expression Stabilities of Candidate Reference Genes for RT-qPCR under Different Stress Conditions in Soybean. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e75271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bu, J.; Zhao, J.; Liu, M. Expression Stabilities of Candidate Reference Genes for RT-qPCR in Chinese Jujube (Ziziphus jujuba Mill.) under a Variety of Conditions. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0154212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Saha, G.C.; Vandemark, G.J. Evaluation of Expression Stability of Candidate References Genes among Green and Yellow Pea Cultivars (Pisum sativum L.) Subjected to Abiotic and Biotic Stress. Am. J. Plant Sci. 2012, 3, 235–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
- Gutierrez, L.; Mauriat, M.; Guénin, S.; Pelloux, J.; Lefebvre, J.; Louvet, R.; Rusterucci, C.; Moritz, T.; Guerineau, F.; Bellini, C.; et al. The lack of a systematic validation of reference genes: A serious pitfall undervalued in reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) analysis in plants. Plant Biotechnol. J. 2008, 6, 609–618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bustin, S.A.; Ruijter, J.M.; Van Den Hoff, M.J.B.; Kubista, M.; Pfaffl, M.W.; Shipley, G.L.; Tran, N.; Rödiger, S.; Untergasser, A.; Mueller, R.; et al. MIQE 2.0: Revision of the Minimum Information for Publication of Quantitative Real-Time PCR Experiments Guidelines. Clin. Chem. 2025, 71, 634–651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, B.; Li, Y.; Ding, Z.; Liao, Z.; Luo, Y.; Tan, B.C.; Teo, C.H. Global trends in Phoebe germplasm exploration: Perspective of threatened tree species ecology and sustainability. J. Nat. Conserv. 2026, 92, 127277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xie, J.; Qi, J.; Huang, X.; Zhou, N.; Hu, Y. Comparative analysis of modern and ancient buried Phoebe zhennan wood: Surface color, chemical components, infrared spectroscopy, and essential oil composition. J. For. Res. 2015, 26, 501–507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kong, L.; Song, Q.; Liang, S.; Huang, H.; Wei, H.; Zhu, S.; Wang, Y.; Lin, H.; Chen, Y.; Su, R.; et al. Multi-omics analysis uncovers the molecular basis of “golden-thread” formation in Phoebe zhennan stems. Cell Rep. 2026, 45, 117359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, B.; Liu, W.; Liao, Z.; Li, Y.; Ding, Z.; Luo, Y.; Tan, B.C.; Teo, C.H. Bioclimatic drivers and niche Thresholds: Decoupling the habitat suitability dynamics of Phoebe zhennan. J. Nat. Conserv. 2025, 90, 127173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, B.; Li, Y.; Liao, Z.; Ding, Z.; Luo, Y.; Tan, B.C.; Teo, C.H. First Report of Colletotrichum fructicola Causing Anthracnose on Phoebe zhennan (nanmu) in China. Plant Dis. 2026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xie, N.; Li, B.; Yu, J.; Shi, R.; Zeng, Q.; Jiang, Y.; Zhao, D. Transcriptomic and proteomic analyses uncover the drought adaption landscape of Phoebe zhennan. BMC Plant Biol. 2022, 22, 95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Yang, H.; An, W.; Gu, Y.; Peng, J.; Jiang, Y.; Li, J.; Chen, L.; Zhu, P.; He, F.; Zhang, F.; et al. Integrative Metabolomic and Transcriptomic Analysis Reveals the Mechanism of Specific Color Formation in Phoebe zhennan Heartwood. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 13569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Zhang, R.; Kuo, R.; Coulter, M.; Calixto, C.P.G.; Entizne, J.C.; Guo, W.; Marquez, Y.; Milne, L.; Riegler, S.; Matsui, A.; et al. A high-resolution single-molecule sequencing-based Arabidopsis transcriptome using novel methods of Iso-seq analysis. Genome Biol. 2022, 23, 149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Wang, K.; Wang, D.; Zheng, X.; Qin, A.; Zhou, J.; Guo, B.; Chen, Y.; Wen, X.; Ye, W.; Zhou, Y.; et al. Multi-strategic RNA-seq analysis reveals a high-resolution transcriptional landscape in cotton. Nat. Commun. 2019, 10, 4714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Svingen, T.; Letting, H.; Hadrup, N.; Hass, U.; Vinggaard, A.M. Selection of reference genes for quantitative RT-PCR (RT-qPCR) analysis of rat tissues under physiological and toxicological conditions. PeerJ 2015, 3, e855. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yuan, G.; Gao, H.; Yang, T. Exploring the Role of the Plant Actin Cytoskeleton: From Signaling to Cellular Functions. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 15480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, X.; Shu, X.; Su, X.; Xiong, Y.; Xiong, Y.; Chen, M.; Tong, Q.; Ma, X.; Zhang, J.; Zhao, J. Selection of Suitable Reference Genes for RT-qPCR Gene Expression Analysis in Centipedegrass under Different Abiotic Stress. Genes 2023, 14, 1874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dudziak, K.; Sozoniuk, M.; Szczerba, H.; Kuzdraliński, A.; Kowalczyk, K.; Börner, A.; Nowak, M. Identification of stable reference genes for qPCR studies in common wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) seedlings under short-term drought stress. Plant Methods 2020, 16, 58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xu, Z.; Wang, M.; Zhou, J.; Liu, H.; Zhang, C.; Li, Y. Identification and Validation of Stable Reference Genes for Gene Expression Analysis in Sword-leaf Dogbane Using Quantitative Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction. J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 2018, 143, 508–517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhu, X.; Li, X.; Chen, W.; Chen, J.; Lu, W.; Chen, L.; Fu, D. Evaluation of New Reference Genes in Papaya for Accurate Transcript Normalization under Different Experimental Conditions. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e44405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nava-Nolazco, R.M.; Ríos-Melendez, S.; Galván-Gordillo, S.V.; Martínez-Navarro, A.C.; Sánchez-Pérez, M.; Chavez-Santoscoy, R.A.; Bibbins-Martínez, M.; Maldonado-Mendoza, I.E.; Arroyo-Becerra, A.; Villalobos-López, M.A. Selection and Validation of Reference Genes for RT-qPCR in Protonemal Tissue of the Desiccation-Tolerant Moss Pseudocrossidium replicatum Under Multiple Abiotic Stress Conditions. Plants 2025, 14, 1752. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Heidari, P.; Rezaee, S.; Pouya, H.S.H.; Mora-Poblete, F. Insights into the Heat Shock Protein 70 (Hsp70) Family in Camelina sativa and Its Roles in Response to Salt Stress. Plants 2024, 13, 3410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- He, F.; Sun, Y.; Li, N.; Zhang, S.; Li, G. Identification of HSP70 family and screening of drought resistance genes in sugar beet. BMC Genom. 2025, 26, 1052. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, Y.; Liang, X.; Zhou, X.; Wu, Z.; Yuan, L.; Wang, Y.; Li, Y. Selection of Reference Genes for qRT-PCR Analysis in Medicinal Plant Glycyrrhiza under Abiotic Stresses and Hormonal Treatments. Plants 2020, 9, 1441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lin, Y.; Zhang, C.; Lan, H.; Gao, S.; Liu, H.; Liu, J.; Cao, M.; Pan, G.; Rong, T.; Zhang, S. Validation of Potential Reference Genes for qPCR in Maize across Abiotic Stresses, Hormone Treatments, and Tissue Types. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e95445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, X.; Zhang, T.; Jiang, L.; Fan, G. Evaluation of Suitable Reference Genes for Quantitative Real-Time PCR in Various Tissues of Apocynum venetum. Genes 2024, 15, 231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hiles, R.; Rogers, A.; Jaiswal, N.; Zhang, W.; Butchacas, J.; Merfa, M.V.; Klass, T.; Barua, P.; Thirumalaikumar, V.P.; Jacobs, J.M.; et al. A Ralstonia solanacearum type III effector alters the actin and microtubule cytoskeleton to promote bacterial virulence in plants. PLoS Pathog. 2024, 20, e1012814. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Wang, J.; Lian, N.; Zhang, Y.; Man, Y.; Chen, L.; Yang, H.; Lin, J.; Jing, Y. The Cytoskeleton in Plant Immunity: Dynamics, Regulation, and Function. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 15553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Haq, I.U.; Ijaz, S.; Hashem, A.; Avila-Quezada, G.D.; Abd_Allah, E.F. Selection and validation of reference genes for normalizing qRT-PCR gene expression studies in Colletotrichum gloeosporioides and interaction with the guava plants. Front. Plant Sci. 2023, 14, 1235848. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Tariq, A.; Pan, K.; Olatunji, O.A.; Graciano, C.; Li, Z.; Sun, F.; Sun, X.; Song, D.; Chen, W.; Zhang, A.; et al. Phosphorous Application Improves Drought Tolerance of Phoebe zhennan. Front. Plant Sci. 2017, 8, 1561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, J.; Han, S.; Yin, W.; Xia, X.; Liu, C. Comparison of Reliable Reference Genes Following Different Hormone Treatments by Various Algorithms for qRT-PCR Analysis of Metasequoia. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 20, 34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhu, J.; Zhang, L.; Li, W.; Han, S.; Yang, W.; Qi, L. Reference Gene Selection for Quantitative Real-time PCR Normalization in Caragana intermedia under Different Abiotic Stress Conditions. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e53196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Shi, L.; Cai, Y.; Yao, J.; Zhang, Q.; He, B.; Lin, S. Reference Genes Selection and Validation for Cinnamomum burmanni by Real-Time Quantitative Polymerase Chain Reaction. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25, 3500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, L.; Cai, Y.; Zhang, M.; Du, G.; Wang, J. Selection and Evaluation of Candidate Reference Genes for Quantitative Real-Time PCR in Aboveground Tissues and Drought Conditions in Rhododendron Delavayi. Front. Genet. 2022, 13, 876482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, X.; Chen, X.; Tan, Q.; He, Y.; Wang, Z.; Zhou, G.; Liu, J. Selection of potential reference genes for RT-qPCR in the plant pathogenic fungus Colletotrichum fructicola. Front. Microbiol. 2022, 13, 982748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Huang, X.; Wu, Y.; Li, Y.; Lin, H.; Ma, L.; Su, X.; Zhou, X. First Report of Colletotrichum fructicola Causing Anthracnose on Phoebe sheareri in China. Plant Dis. 2021, 106, 1994. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fromm, J. Xylem Development in Trees: From Cambial Divisions to Mature Wood Cells. In Cellular Aspects of Wood Formation; Plant Cell Monographs; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2013; Volume 20, pp. 3–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Luo, L.; Zhu, Y.; Gui, J.; Yin, T.; Luo, W.; Liu, J.; Li, L. A Comparative Analysis of Transcription Networks Active in Juvenile and Mature Wood in Populus. Front. Plant Sci. 2021, 12, 675075. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fraga, M.F.; Rodriguez, R.; Canal, M.J. Genomic DNA methylation-demethylation during aging and reinvigoration of Pinus radiata. Tree Physiol. 2002, 22, 813–816. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]







| Drought Stress | Disease Stress | Total | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ranking | Gene | Stability | Gene | Stability | Gene | Stability |
| 1 | HSP70-1 | 0.142 | Actin-101 | 0.147 | Actin-101 | 0.215 |
| 2 | CYP20-1 | 0.304 | HSP70-2 | 1.470 | β-Tubulin | 0.800 |
| 3 | β-Tubulin | 0.368 | Actin | 1.592 | HSP70-2 | 1.514 |
| 4 | CYP95 | 0.401 | β-Tubulin | 1.744 | Actin | 2.927 |
| 5 | Actin-2-like | 0.413 | CYP20-1 | 6.350 | HSP70-1 | 4.404 |
| 6 | HSP70-3 | 0.443 | HSP70-1 | 6.467 | CYP20-1 | 6.617 |
| 7 | Actin-101 | 0.503 | HSP70-3 | 11.721 | HSP70-3 | 8.183 |
| 8 | HSP70-2 | 0.554 | Actin-2-like | 14.953 | Actin-2-like | 11.543 |
| 9 | Actin | 0.639 | CYP95 | 16.655 | CYP95 | 11.902 |
| Ranking | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Drought | Gene | Actin-2-like | CYP20-1 | HSP70-1 | CYP95 | Actin-101 | β-Tubulin | HSP70-3 | HSP70-2 | Actin |
| SD | 0.19 | 0.26 | 0.35 | 0.35 | 0.44 | 0.55 | 0.60 | 0.64 | 0.74 | |
| CV [%] | 0.78 | 1.32 | 1.26 | 1.40 | 1.57 | 1.86 | 2.06 | 2.15 | 2.86 | |
| Disease | Gene | Actin-101 | β-Tubulin | Actin | HSP70-2 | HSP70-1 | CYP20-1 | HSP70-3 | Actin-2-like | CYP95 |
| SD | 0.17 | 0.82 | 0.83 | 1.15 | 3.43 | 3.65 | 6.68 | 12.22 | 15.29 | |
| CV [%] | 0.58 | 2.53 | 2.48 | 3.29 | 0.58 | 11.79 | 12.22 | 17.78 | 16.67 | |
| Total | Gene | Actin-101 | β-Tubulin | HSP70-2 | HSP70-1 | Actin | HSP70-3 | CYP20-1 | CYP95 | Actin-2-like |
| SD | 0.55 | 1.57 | 2.59 | 3.18 | 3.80 | 3.85 | 5.68 | 8.02 | 8.52 | |
| CV [%] | 1.92 | 5.08 | 6.01 | 8.84 | 10.83 | 10.97 | 12.50 | 13.33 | 18.89 | |
| Ranking | Drought Stress | Disease Stress | Total | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gene | Values | Gene | Values | Gene | Values | |
| 1 | CYP20-1 | 1.68 | Actin-101 | 1 | Actin-101 | 1.32 |
| 2 | HSP70-1 | 1.73 | Actin | 2.06 | β-Tubulin | 1.41 |
| 3 | CYP95 | 2.63 | β-Tubulin | 2.91 | HSP70-2 | 2.71 |
| 4 | Actin-2-like | 3.16 | HSP70-2 | 3.36 | Actin | 4.23 |
| 5 | β-Tubulin | 4.36 | CYP20-1 | 5.23 | HSP70-1 | 4.95 |
| 6 | Actin-101 | 6.19 | HSP70-1 | 5.73 | CYP20-1 | 5.96 |
| 7 | HSP70-3 | 6.48 | HSP70-3 | 7.00 | HSP70-3 | 6.74 |
| 8 | HSP70-2 | 8.00 | Actin-2-like | 8.00 | Actin-2-like | 8.24 |
| 9 | Actin | 9.00 | CYP95 | 9.00 | CYP95 | 8.74 |
| Drought Stress | Disease Stress | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reference Gene | R2 | P | Reference Gene | R2 | P |
| HSP70-1 | 0.6124 | 0.0125 * | Actin | 0.5085 | 0.0315 * |
| Actin-2-like | 0.5842 | 0.0161 * | β-Tubulin | 0.4682 | 0.0416 * |
| CYP95 | 0.4981 | 0.0335 * | HSP70-3 | 0.4054 | 0.0224 * |
| β-Tubulin | 0.4512 | 0.0471 * | CYP20-1 | 0.3088 | 0.1205 |
| Actin-101 | 0.3804 | 0.0762 | HSP70-2 | 0.2185 | 0.2052 |
| HSP70-3 | 0.2541 | 0.1668 | HSP70-1 | 0.1214 | 0.3588 |
| HSP70-2 | 0.1495 | 0.4635 | Actin-2-like | 0.0521 | 0.5542 |
| Actin | 0.0788 | 0.7618 | CYP95 | 0.0184 | 0.8155 |
| Gene Symbol | Putative Function | Gene No. | Gene Name | Primer Sequence (5′-3′) | Product (bp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ACT | essential cytoskeletal structural components | Isoform0044008 | Actin-101 | CTCTCTATGCCAGTGGTCGT | 130 |
| TCACGACCTGCAAGATCCAG | |||||
| Isoform0034540 | Actin | GGCCTACATTGCCCTTGACT | 113 | ||
| GCTCCGCCCCAATGGTAATA | |||||
| Isoform0048328 | Actin-2-like | GGCCGTACCACAGGTATTGT | 107 | ||
| GCAAGGTCAAGCCGGAGAAT | |||||
| Beta-tubulin | cytoskeletal component | Isoform0040625 | β-Tubulin | TGGATCTGGGATGGGAACCT | 126 |
| GCATTGTACGGCTCAACCAC | |||||
| CYP | peptidyl-prolyl cis-trans isomerases critical for protein folding | Isoform0050648 | CYP20-1 | TGGCAAATGCTGGTCCTGAT | 170 |
| CACTTTCTGCTTGGGTGTGC | |||||
| Isoform0025490 | CYP95 | GCGAATGCTGGTCCTGATAC | 159 | ||
| AACAGGCTTTGCCTCGTCAG | |||||
| HSP70 | constitutive ATP-dependent molecular chaperones | Isoform0001533 | HSP70-1 | AATTCAGGGCGGCATCCTTC | 101 |
| TGGTGAAGATACCTCCTAGCG | |||||
| Isoform0011934 | HSP70-2 | TTTGAGGTGAAGGCCACAGC | 163 | ||
| TAGCCCTCTCACATGCAGTC | |||||
| Isoform0032092 | HSP70-3 | TGGAGACACGCATCTTGGAG | 149 | ||
| TCCTCTTAGCCCTCTCGCAT |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.
Share and Cite
Chen, B.; Luo, Y.; Li, Y.; Liao, Z.; Ding, Z.; Liu, W. Comparative Analysis of Full-Length Reference Gene Stability in Phoebe zhennan Under Primary Abiotic and Biotic Stresses. Plants 2026, 15, 1736. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants15111736
Chen B, Luo Y, Li Y, Liao Z, Ding Z, Liu W. Comparative Analysis of Full-Length Reference Gene Stability in Phoebe zhennan Under Primary Abiotic and Biotic Stresses. Plants. 2026; 15(11):1736. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants15111736
Chicago/Turabian StyleChen, Beibei, Yingxuan Luo, Yuan Li, Zhenqi Liao, Zhongbiao Ding, and Weiyi Liu. 2026. "Comparative Analysis of Full-Length Reference Gene Stability in Phoebe zhennan Under Primary Abiotic and Biotic Stresses" Plants 15, no. 11: 1736. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants15111736
APA StyleChen, B., Luo, Y., Li, Y., Liao, Z., Ding, Z., & Liu, W. (2026). Comparative Analysis of Full-Length Reference Gene Stability in Phoebe zhennan Under Primary Abiotic and Biotic Stresses. Plants, 15(11), 1736. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants15111736

