Next Article in Journal
Entomopathogenic Fungi Effectively Control Phorodon cannabis Aphid Population in Cannabis sativa Plants
Previous Article in Journal
Soil Carbon Sequestration: Role of Fe Oxides and Polyphenol Oxidase Across Temperature and Cultivation Systems
Previous Article in Special Issue
Influence of the Extraction Method on the Biological Potential of Solidago virgaurea L. Essential Oil and Hydrolates
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Diversity of Phytochemical Content, Antioxidant Activity, and Fruit Morphometry of Three Mallow, Malva Species (Malvaceae)

1
Laboratory of Plant Productivity and Environmental Constraints (LR18ES04), Department of Biology, Faculty of Sciences of Tunis, University Tunis EL Manar, Tunis 2092, Tunisia
2
Department of Life Sciences, College of Sciences, Imam Mohammad Ibn Saud Islamic University (IMSIU), Riyadh 11623, Saudi Arabia
3
Arid and Oases Cropping Laboratory LR16IRA02, Arid Lands Institute, Medenine 4119, Tunisia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Plants 2025, 14(6), 930; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants14060930
Submission received: 19 January 2025 / Revised: 21 February 2025 / Accepted: 13 March 2025 / Published: 16 March 2025

Abstract

:
The Malvaceae family contains a variety of medicinal plants, including those of the mallow (Malva) genus. This study investigated the phytochemical composition, antioxidant activity, and morphometry of fruit from three Malva species (common mallow M. sylvestris, cheeseweed mallow M. parviflora, and Cornish mallow M. multiflora. The phytochemical analysis and antioxidant potentials were conducted on dry and powdered fruits. The morphometry and texture were performed using the software imagery tools. Results showed that the principal component analysis based on phytochemical content, antioxidant activity, and morphometric and texture traits showed a group structure according to species. The M. multiflora fruits were distinguished by high values of morphometric and texture traits, oil content (17.96%), total flavonoid content (1.70 mg RE/g DM), total antioxidant activity, and high FRAP value. The M. parviflora fruits were smaller than the M. multiflora and were rich in proteins (17.70%), starch (94.41 mg/g DW), and soluble sugar contents (57.74 mg/g DW). However, the M. sylvestris fruits have an intermediate position within the two other species and are rich in total polyphenols (2.34 mg GAE/g DM) and flavonoid contents (0.75 mg RE/g DM). The combined data, including phytochemical characterization, antioxidant activity, and morphometry, could be used as an alternative tool to molecular analysis to distinguish between Malva species and to select future application of Malva fruits based on their metabolite’s composition.

1. Introduction

The Malva genus, part of the Malvaceae family, includes common wild plants used in traditional medicine and shows potential activity against diseases related to the digestive system, respiratory disorders, and inflammation [1,2,3,4], and were also of culinary value [5]. Malva plants are most famous for their anti-inflammatory effect, which is attributed to bioactive compounds such as phenolics, which are also potent antioxidants in different organs (leaves, stem, flower, fruits) [1,2,3]. The use of medicinal plants as natural sources for drugs must be accompanied by a clear knowledge of species composition. Furthermore, their identification is crucial to avoid misuse such as incorrect dosage or the use of harmful or ineffective species [6].
The distinction of Malva species, including common mallow (Malva sylvestris), cheeseweed mallow (Malva parviflora), and Cornish mallow (Malva multiflora), has traditionally relied on molecular markers such as DNA barcoding and microsatellites [7,8]. While molecular tools provide high accuracy, they can be costly, time-consuming, and require sophisticated laboratory equipment, which limits their widespread application, especially in regions with limited resources. In contrast, the use of phytochemical profiling and morphological traits offers a more accessible, cost-effective, and rapid approach to species differentiation. Phytochemical analysis, including the examination of secondary metabolites, has been shown to reveal unique chemical signatures that distinguish species with similar ecological niches.
Numerous studies have been published on the diversity of the Malva genus, focusing on morphological traits, chemical composition, and molecular markers [9,10,11,12]. The morphological characteristics of the stem, leaves, flowers, fruit, and seeds support the diversity within the Malva genus, with some species distinguishable by specific features [13]. The digital image was used as a tool to conduct morphological description and to extract morpho-colorimetric data on plant organs. The seed morphometric and colorimetric features characterizing size, shape, and textural seed parameters of 28 taxa belonging to the genera Lavatera L. and Malva L. were performed by using computer vision techniques [13]. The obtained results for Malva showed the high variation among taxa and supported the use of seed image analysis as a diagnostic for systematic purposes. Furthermore, the identification of Malva species/varieties and the evaluation of their genetic diversity were studied by flow cytometric genome size estimation and ISSR molecular markers on 12 selected accessions [14]. The Random Amplified Polymorphic DNA combined to morphometry traits were conducted to investigate the genetic variation among seven Malva species including M. sylvestris and M. parviflora [15]. These studies reported high genetic diversity, which clearly indicated that the Malva species can adapt to changing environments. Based on pollen morphometric characters, scanning electron microscopy and light microscopy were used to discriminate between two Malva species (M. neglecta and M. parviflora) [16]. The phytochemical and biological activities of extracts from leaves, flowers, and fruits were conducted on several species such as M. sylvestris, M. parviflora [1], M. pseudolavatera [4], and M. aegyptiaca [2]. Despite the valuable insights provided by morphological traits and texture characteristics, limited information exists on the integration of morphometry, texture, and phytochemical contents for Malva species characterization. Combining these approaches not only improves the accuracy of species distinction but also complements molecular data, offering a practical solution, particularly in cases where genetic resources are limited or inaccessible. Phytochemical studies hold significant potential for uncovering bioactive compounds that could lead to new medicinal applications of Malva species.
In this study, we focused on phytochemical, antioxidant, morphometric characters and texture traits of Malva fruits to highlight specific characters, their uses for fast and reliable species identification and their phytochemical potential. For this, fruits from three Malva species located in sympatry were used (M. multiflora, M. parviflora and M. sylvestris).

2. Results

2.1. Phytochemical Characteristics

The phytochemical contents showed that the M. sylvestris fruits were distinguished by having the highest TPC values of 2.34 mg GAE/g DM, followed by M. parviflora with 2.19 mg GAE/g DM, and M. multiflora (2.01 mg GAE/g DM). The M. multiflora fruits seemed to be rich in total flavonoid content (1.64 mg RE/g DM) compared to M. sylvestris (0.70 RE/g DM) and M. parviflora (0.30 RE/g DM) fruit extracts (Figure 1a). Results showed that the M. parviflora fruits have the highest soluble sugar (57.92 mg/g DM) and starch (94.67 mg/g DM) compared to M. sylvestris and M. multiflora (Figure 1b). Significant differences were noted within the TPC, TFC, soluble sugar, and starch according to the studied species.
The M. multiflora fruits seemed to be rich in oil (17.87%), followed by M. multiflora with a percentage of 16.34, and M. parviflora having 13.78% oil (Figure 2a). The highest carbon value (44.72%) and nitrogen (2.96%) content were found in M. multiflora fruit (Figure 2b).

2.2. Antioxidant Activity

The antioxidant activity of Malva aqueous extracts was assessed using three tests: DPPH, FRAP, and Total Antioxidant Activity (TAA). The results indicated that all extracts exhibited antioxidant activity (Table 1). Among them, the fruit of M. multiflora showed the highest antioxidant activity in the TAA test, with a value of 22.01 mg AAE/g DM and a ferric reducing–antioxidant power (FRAP) of 58.811 as percentage of reductor power. In contrast, the fruit of M. parviflora demonstrated the strongest antioxidant activity in the DPPH test, with the lowest IC50 value of 0.01 mg/mL having an important potential for scavenging free radicals. M. sylvestris exhibited intermediate antioxidant potential in comparison to the other species.

2.3. Morphometric and Texture Characters of Malva Fruits

The morphometric (16 parameters) and texture (8 parameters) traits of Malva fruits from the three species studied were determined (Table S1). Analysis of variance revealed significant differences among species for most of the measured traits, except for three morphometric traits: Feret Angle, Angle, and the proportional relationship between the width and length of the fruit’s bounding rectangle, which were not significantly different (p > 0.05) (Table 2). Out of the 24 measured morphometric and texture traits, 9 traits exhibited high values that distinguished M. multiflora, including 8 morphometric traits and 1 texture trait. Notably, the area was significantly larger in M. multiflora (60.46 mm2), approximately 1.5 to 2 times greater than that of M. parviflora (30.00 mm2) and M. sylvestris (42.27 mm2) fruits. Regarding texture traits, the integrated density (the product of area and mean gray value) was also notably higher in M. multiflora fruits.
M. parviflora fruits were distinguished by the maximum gray value and skewness (the degree of asymmetry in the distribution of gray intensity values), which were more distinct compared to the other two species. In contrast, the mean and mode of the gray value texture traits effectively differentiated M. sylvestris fruits from the other species. Interestingly, the FeretX and FeretY values were highest and most similar in M. parviflora (FeretX = 329.90, FeretY = 413.67) and M. sylvestris (FeretX = 400.50, FeretY = 457.83), while M. multiflora fruits had significantly lower mean values of 119.40 and 121.57, respectively.

2.4. Multivariate Analysis

The PCA is a statistical technique used to reduce the dimensionality of data while preserving as much variability as possible and is a valuable tool to improve the process of group structuration based on used data. The PCA was applied on phytochemical characteristics, antioxidant potential, morphometry, and texture. The first two axes of PCA explained 71.44% of total variation (Table S2). The first axis explained 49.83% of total variation and was correlated to 6 phytochemical data (TFC, sugar, starch, oil, TAA, and FRAP value), 11 morphometric parameters (area, perimeter, width, height, major, minor, circularity index, Feret, and MinFeret), and one texture (integrated density). However, the second PCA axis explained 21.62% of total variation and was correlated to 4 phytochemical parameters (TPC, C, N, proteins, and IC50) and 4 texture traits (median, mode, max gray value, and skew) (Table S1). The PCA plot, defined by the first two axes, clearly revealed three distinct groups corresponding to each species. The integration of phytochemical data with morphometric and texture traits not only enhances the structure of these species groups but also highlights their variation in terms of phytochemical contents having potential biological activities. This approach underscores the relationship between these traits and the species’ bioactivity, providing valuable insights into their medicinal potential (Figure 3, Figure S1).

3. Discussion

3.1. Phytochemical Data

With regards to phytochemical content and antioxidant potential, Malva fruits exhibited significant variation among species. Identifying which species have higher chemical concentrations can help pinpoint the most potent species for specific medicinal applications, such as anti-inflammatory, antimicrobial, or anticancer properties. The chemical variation found is linked to differences in the composition of both primary and secondary metabolites. The primary metabolites synthesized by plants are involved in the fundamental metabolic processes that are utilized by the plants for growth and development. The M. parviflora fruits were rich in soluble sugar and starch compared to the M. multiflora and M. sylvestris. In fact, some primary metabolites possess specific traits that are valuable for chemotaxonomic studies within the Malvaceae family (e.g., Lavatera triloba) [17], as well as in other families such as Bixaceae (e.g., Bixa orellana) [18] and both wild and cultivated olive trees (Olea europaea) [19]. Within the Malvaceae family, the chemotaxonomic studies on certain species have been conducted, with fatty acid content being considered a valuable taxonomic marker [20]. Da Silva et al. [21] have studied the fatty acid composition of oil seeds from seven species of the Malvaceae family as chemotaxonomic tools, and results supported the distinction between Sida and Sidastrum.
On the other hand, the secondary metabolites synthesized by plants are used for protection and defense mechanisms and they are very useful in chemotaxonomic classification including glycoside, alkaloid, volatile oil, flavonoids, polyphenols, and terpenoids [17]. The phenolic compounds constitute an essential group of secondary metabolites with a great diversity of structures [22] linked to the prevention of several diseases due to their pharmacological and biological activities [23].
Herein, we found that M. sylvestris fruits were rich in secondary metabolites compared to other species. This aligns with findings indicating the richness of this species in total polyphenols [1,24]. Beghdad et al. [25] reported that the leaf extracts of M. sylvestris have shown the highest amount of total phenolics (2.34 mg GAE/g DM) and total flavonoids (0.694 ± 0.017 mg RE/100 g) while the seed extracts presented the lowest values. However, Barros et al. [1] found that fruits from M. sylvestris, when compared to its leaves and flowers, revealed the lowest levels of nutraceuticals including phenols, flavonoids, and carotenoids. In comparison to the other species, the fruit extracts of M. sylvestris exhibited intermediate antioxidant potential with TAA assay (12.04 mg AAE/g DM) and FRAP (42.26%). In traditional medicine, M. sylvestris is widely used and it was investigated, with results showing an anti-inflammatory activity of fruit extracts [26] which supported the present results, showing that the aqueous extract from M. sylvestris fruits could be a source of bioactive polyphenols.
Regarding the M. multiflora fruits, they were distinguished by their high total flavonoid content and showcasing the highest antioxidant activity in the TAA test (22.01 mg AAE/g DM) and the FRAP (58.81%). This confirms the use of this wild plant as a “beqoula” dish (traditional North African salad) to meet the nutritional and therapeutic needs of the North African population, in particular [27]. Despite its traditional use as food and medicine, very limited information was found in the literature in regards to the phytochemical composition of this species.
Concerning M. parviflora, the fruits extracts exhibited the strongest antioxidant activity in the DPPH test (the lowest IC50 value of 0.01 mg/mL) with the amount of total phenolics (2.19 mg GAE/g DM) being slightly lower than M. sylvestris. The results of Naser et al. [28] demonstrate that M. parviflora leaf extracts have DPPH radical scavenging activity and might be used as a natural source for bioactive compounds. In contrast to M. multiflora, this species was widely studied for their chemical composition and antioxidant capacity. M. parviflora contains flavonoids, steroids, saponins, tannins, and terpenes in the water extract [28]. This confirms the uses of M. parviflora fruits in the Mediterranean diet and their characterization by their important biological activities [29]. Interestingly, M. parviflora mucilage extracted from its fruit and leaves can be used therapeutically for the management of inflammation, gastric ulcer, and coughing [29].
Divers’ methods were used to assess the antioxidant activity of plant extract [3,30,31,32]. It has been recommended to use different tests to evaluate the antioxidant potential of plant extract. For that, in this study, three different methods were used, including the ferric reducing–antioxidant power (FRAP), DPPH for scavenging radicals, and the TAA based on molybdenum reaction. Results showed that the fruit extract from the three studied Malva species exhibit antioxidant activity as shown previously on M. neglecta [33]. The use of Malva fruits in traditional food and medicine in different regions suggested their richness in compounds with antioxidant potential. It has been reported in different studies that the compounds having antioxidant potential in fruits and vegetables are the main factors explaining the efficacy of traditional foods in reducing the incidence of chronic diseases [34], which would explain by polyphenols with antioxidant capacity that could scavenge reactive chemical species. Some plant polyphenols are important components of human and animal diets and are safe for consumption [26,35], supporting the use of Malva fruits in foods. On other hand, the antioxidant compounds have a wide range of biological effects such as including antimicrobial, antiviral, anti-inflammatory activities [26,32].
In general, our results indicated that the extracts from the three fruit species exhibited antioxidant activity with significant variation. Accordingly, these species with antioxidant potential may be beneficial for preventive medicine or as dietary supplements to support overall health.

3.2. Morphometric and Texture

The morphometric and texture features based on imagery tools of seeds, stones, and fruits were used to study interspecific variation [15,17,36]. The imagery tool is useful to the morphometry study of plant organs and requires the use of geometric figures treated by software for decomposition of obtained shape variation into its symmetric and asymmetric components. The availability of digital image analysis software aids in the development of several morphometric indices [36]. The morphometry computer-assisted tools give the measurement of morphological traits of objects and are different from conventional Euclidean geometry. It was based on measurements using digital images containing some components of the image field as applied to our study on the 30 fruits per image. This method is based on threshold discrimination of objects by edge-finding algorithms. Each object in the image field was isolated by its true configuration and was converted to a binary image to conduct all measurements [17]. For this, in this study, the ImageJ 1xi free software accessed on 24 February 2024 (https://imagej.net/ij/) was used to treat digital images of Malva fruits from three species, converted into binary format, and to determine morphometric and texture features data. Thirty Mava fruits at three replicates (30 × 3) were subjected to morphometric and texture features measurement, followed by uni- and multivariate analyses. The collected data showed a significant specific effect (species variation) on measured parameters revealed through ANOVA and followed by Duncan’s test, confirming the significant morphometric differences among fruits from the three Malva species studied. Previously, morphometric studies have been investigated, and results showed the usefulness of these data in investigating the species and their varieties, as well as the environmental effect on seeds [36,37], stones [15], and tomato fruit shape [38]. While it has been reported that the Malva genus is morphologically diverse, some species are hardly distinguishable based on morphological traits [12]. The seed morphometry traits had been used to characterize Malva alliance [13]. Herein, the morphometry data combined with phytochemical characters could be used as efficient markers for species structure, as confirmed with the PCA analysis.

3.3. Multivariate Analysis

In this study, species characterization was carried out by considering the combination of all data, and results showed that the data integration of phytochemical, antioxidant potential, and morphometry allowed a clear species group’s structure. Accordingly, the total polyphenol and flavonoid contents could be used as phytochemical tools with morphometry and texture features to distinguish the Malva species. In this case, the data could be considered to valorize the Malva fruit in adequate nutritional and/or pharmaceuticals areas. The present results highlight that the M. sylvestris and M. multiflora were distinguished from M. parviflora in terms of secondary metabolites. The M. parviflora fruits were distinguished from the others by their nutritional reserves including protein, sugar, and starch contents. Thus, the phytochemical traits can complement morphological data in distinguishing Malva species and the adequate domain of valorization. This could be a promising tool for Malva species characterization. Both morphological characteristics and chemical composition are used to identify and classify medicinal plants, ensuring correct species identification for effective use in traditional medicine, particularly in ethnobotany and pharmacognosy. In future research, these findings will be applied on Malva species from different regions to further understand the environmental effects—through environment and species interaction—on morphometry and phytochemical content and to validate their uses in Malva species identification. The results of this study underline the potential of integrating phytochemical and morphological traits as consistent tools for species distinction in Malva species, offering an alternative to molecular markers, especially in settings with limited access to advanced genetic resources. Furthermore, our results highlighted the richness of these three Malva species in terms of their antioxidant potential. Moving forward, future studies could explore the broader applicability of these tools across other species within the Malvaceae family or other plant genera.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Malva Fruits Sampling

The fruit from three Malva species were harvested at maturity from the same region in northeastern Tunisia, Bizerte (37° 16′ N, 9° 52′ E). These species were in sympatry and share the same environmental conditions. Species identification is based on the Tunisian flora [39]. To conduct a randomized sampling, 10 plants were used for each species to harvest fruits (10 × 30), with a total of 300 fruits per species. The Malva fruit is called schizocarp, consisting of 10–12 glabrous wrinkled carpels transformed into achenes (mericarps) after double fertilization. Each achene contains one reniform seed.
The harvested Malva fruits were divided into two lots. One lot was used for morphometric analysis; the second one was used to proceed with the phytochemical determination. For that, fruits were dried in an oven at 40 °C until weight stabilization, then ground into a powder using an electric grinder, and stored in dark glass bottles at 4 °C until analysis.

4.2. Preparation of the Fruit Extract

The aqueous extraction by maceration was conducted using 1 g of dry, homogenized powdered fruits immersed in 10 mL of distilled water. The mixture was kept under magnetic stirring, incubated for 24 h in the dark and at 25 °C. Finally, the solutions were filtered using Wattman filter paper and the obtained extract was labelled and stored at 4 °C until use [31]. All chemicals and reagents were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich Co. (St. Louis, MO, USA) to conduct chemical analysis.

4.3. Determination of Total Polyphenols Content

The total polyphenols content (TPC) was estimated using the Folin–Ciocalteu method with modifications. A quantity of 63 μL of extract sample was mixed with 63 μL of the Folin–Ciocalteu reagent in a 96-well plate. After 5 min, 625 μL of 7.5% sodium carbonate (Na2CO3) was added. The solution was incubated in the dark at room temperature for 90 min and the absorbance reading was carried out at 760 nm using the UV/VIS microplate spectrophotometer. The control was prepared under the same conditions, with the extract being replaced with distilled water. The TPC was calculated from the calibration curve using gallic acid as the standard, and the results were expressed in milligram gallic acid equivalent per gram of dry matter (mg GAE/g DM) [31].

4.4. Determination of Total Flavonoid Content

The total flavonoid content (TFC) was determined by the aluminum trichloride method. A quantity of 125 μL of each extract was mixed with 38 μL of a sodium nitrite NaNO2 solution in a 96-well plate. After 6 min, 75 μL of 10% freshly prepared AlCl3 solution was added. Then, 250 μL of sodium hydroxide solution (NaOH) and 762 μL of distilled water were added to the mixture. After 5 min, the absorbance was measured at 510 nm using the microplate UV/VIS spectrophotometer. The TFC was expressed in milligram rutin equivalent per gram of dry matter (mg RE/g DM) based on a calibration curve using rutin as standard [31].

4.5. Determination of Protein Content by LECO Analyzer

Protein content was determined by elemental microanalysis as % nitrogen content x 6.25 using a LECO CHNS-932 analyzer (St. Joseph, MI, USA). This analysis was performed on 1 g sample of dry matter, packed in aluminum foil without any solvent and placed in specific wells of the apparatus. The display indicates the protein content (%) [40].

4.6. Determination of Oil Content

The oil content of Malva fruits was determined by the Soxhlet method. For this, 10 g of powdered fruits were placed into the thimble of the Soxhlet chamber. A volume of 200 mL of petroleum ether was used as extraction solvent in a round bottom flask and assembled for Soxhlet extractor. After complete continuous extraction for 6 h at 65 °C, the petroleum ether was removed by rotary vacuum evaporator [19]. The oil content was expressed as percentage using the following formula: Oil content (%) = [(W1 − W2)/W] × 100, where W1 = Initial sample weight placed in the thimble; W2 = Final sample weight obtained after drying by rotary vacuum evaporator.

4.7. Total Soluble Sugar and Starch Contents

The extraction was carried out using 10 mg of DM dissolved in 1 mL of 80% ethanol. The mixture was placed in a water bath at 70 °C for 30 min. Afterwards, the solution was cooled on ice, followed by centrifugation for 15 min at 9000 rpm at 4 °C. The obtained supernatant was used for sugar quantification and the pellet for starch quantification. A volume of 50 µL of supernatant was mixed with 2.5 mL of anthrone and 1200 µL of 80% ethanol. The solution was placed at 100 °C in a water bath for 10 min, then cooled on ice. The absorbance was measured at 640 nm. For starch quantification, 1 mL of 80% ethanol was added to the pellet, followed by centrifugation for 15 min at 9000 rpm at 4 °C. After filtration, 1 mL of the obtained supernatant was mixed with 30 µL of 35% perchloric acid and kept for 30 min in ice. Next, 2.5 mL of anthrone was added to 1200 µL of 80% ethanol and 100 µL of the starch extract. The obtained solution was stirred, then placed in a 100 °C water bath for 10 min. Subsequently, the solution was cooled, and the absorbance was measured at 640 nm [41]. Calibration was prepared using a glucose solution as a standard, and a control was prepared under the same experimental conditions using 80% ethanol. The sugar and the starch contents were expressed as mg per gram of dry matter (mg/g DM).

4.8. Antioxidant Activity

4.8.1. Total Antioxidant Capacity

This assay is based on the reduction of Mo(VI) to Mo(V) by the extract and, subsequently, the formation of a green phosphate/Mo(V) complex at acid pH [42,43]. An aliquot of 0.1 mL of each extract was combined to 1 mL of reagent solution (0.6 M sulfuric acid, 28 mM sodium phosphate, and 4 mM ammonium molybdate). The tubes were incubated at 95 °C for 90 min. After that, the mixture was cooled at room temperature and the absorbance of each solution was measured at 695 nm against a blank. The ascorbic acid was used as standard, and the total antioxidant capacity (TAC) was expressed as mg ascorbic acid equivalents per gram dry matter (mg AAE/g DM).

4.8.2. Radical Scavenging Ability

The radical scavenging activity of the extracts was measured using the DPPH (1,1-diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl) assay as described [32]. For this, 1 mL of the extracts at various concentrations were mixed with 0.25 mL of a DPPH-methanolic solution (0.2 mM) and were allowed to react in the dark for 30 min. Then, the absorbance of the resulting solution was measured at 517 nm. A control using distilled water until the extract was prepared under the same conditions. The inhibition of the percentage of the extracts was calculated at each concentration to determine IC50 (g/mL).

4.8.3. Ferric Reducing–Antioxidant Power (FRAP)

The ferric reducing–antioxidant power (FRAP) measures the ability of the tested extracts to reduce ferric iron (Fe3+) present in the K3Fe(CN)6 complex to ferrous iron (Fe2+). A volume of 100 µL of different concentrations of each extract or ascorbic acid as a reference were added to 0.15 mL of phosphate buffer (0.2 M, pH 6.6) and 0.25 mL of ferricyanide (1%) and incubated at 50 °C for 20 min. After incubation, 0.35 mL of 10% tetrachloroacetic acid (TCA) was added and centrifuged at 3000× g for 10 min. Then, 0.25 mL of the obtained supernatant was added to 0.5 mL of 1% FeCl3 and 4 mL of H2O. The absorbance was immediately measured at 700 nm against a control prepared under the same conditions. The results were expressed as FRAP-reducing capacity (%) as follows: (Aa − Ab)/Ab × 100 with Aa the extract absorbance, Ab ascorbic acid absorbance [35].

4.9. Morphometric and Texture Analysis

The morphometric and texture measures were determined using the free software ImageJ (https://imagej.net/ij/) download the 24 February 2024. For each species, 30 fruits were randomly used three times to obtain digital images using HP Scanner, accompanied by a known scale which was used for scale-setting, and analysis started by the software ImageJ. Then, the images were converted into basic format, followed by binary making (Figure 4). The fruit projections obtained were analyzed as indicated previously [15,16,36]. The computer-assisted image analysis using the software ImageJ was utilized to determine 16 morphometric traits including those of size (area, length, width, and perimeter) and of shape (roundness and circularity index) and 8 texture features traits. Table 1 and Figure 5 showed the studied parameters as described previously [44].

4.10. Statistical Analyses

All data were expressed as mean ± standard deviations and were subjected to one-way analysis of variance analysis (ANOVA), followed by Duncan’s range multiple tests. In addition, the principal component analysis (PCA) was conducted on morphometry, texture features, and phytochemical data. Statistical analyses were performed using XLSTAT 2022 1.2. software accessed on 5 march 2024 (www.XlSTAT.com).

5. Conclusions

In this study, phytochemical content and morphometric traits of fruits from three Malva species were analyzed. M. multiflora was distinguished by its high values in morphometric traits, texture, oil content, total flavonoid content, and total antioxidant activity. The M. parviflora fruits were smaller and had higher levels of proteins, starch, and soluble sugars. M. sylvestris fruits exhibited intermediate characteristics between the other two species and were notably rich in total polyphenol content. These findings suggest that Malva fruits hold significant potential for use in natural medicine, with each species offering a specific profile of phytochemical compounds. The high flavonoid content and antioxidant activity in M. multiflora, for example, could support its use in formulations aimed at combating oxidative stress-related conditions. The elevated protein and starch levels in M. parviflora may be valuable in developing nutrient-rich supplements or functional foods. Meanwhile, the polyphenol-rich M. sylvestris may be explored for its potential anti-inflammatory or antimicrobial properties. The combined data, including phytochemical traits, morphometric, and texture analysis, can guide the selection of Malva species for future natural medicine applications based on their richness in primary or secondary metabolites and antioxidant activity. This approach not only enhances the medicinal potential of Malva but also offers a framework for sustainable harvesting and utilization of these species.
Finally, future work could involve refining phytochemical markers through advanced techniques, such as mass spectrometry or high-performance liquid chromatography, to enhance resolution and increase the number of chemical profiles used for species differentiation. This would pave the way for more targeted and effective applications of Malva in natural health products.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/plants14060930/s1, Figure S1. Principal component plot defined by the two first axes (PC1 and PC2) of principal component analysis based on morphometry, texture traits, chemical content, and antioxidant activity of fruit of Malva species: M. multiflora (Mm), M. parviflora (Mp), and M. sylvestris (Ms) with label of points; Table S1. Morphometry and grayscale texture traits from binary imaging applied on the fruits of the three Malva species; Table S2. Principal component analyses applied morphometry, texture, and phytochemical data of Malva fruits.

Author Contributions

F.R.: Writing original draft, validation, investigation, formal analysis, conceptualization. M.R.: Validation, funding acquisition, conceptualization, project administration. M.A.B.: writing original draft, validation, investigation, conceptualization. H.H.: Writing original draft, validation, supervision, methodology, conceptualization. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported and funded by the Deanship of Scientific Research at Imam Mohammad Ibn Saud Islamic University (IMSIU) (grant number IMSIU-DDRSP2502).

Data Availability Statement

All data generated or analyzed during this study are available within the article and the Supplementary File.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by University Tunis El Manar, Tunsia.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Barros, L.; Carvalho, A.M.; Ferreira, I.C.F.R. Leaves, flowers, immature fruits and leafy flowered stems of Malva sylvestris: A comparative study of the nutraceutical potential and composition. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2010, 48, 1466–1472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Zouari, N.; Fakhfakh, N.; Zouari, S.; Sellami, M.; Abid, M.; Ayadi, M.A.; Zaidi, S.; Neffati, M. Volatile and lipid analyses by gas chromatography/mass spectrometry and nutraceutical potential of edible wild Malva aegyptiaca L. (Malvaceae). Int. J. Food Sci. Nutr. 2011, 62, 600–608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Akbar, S.; Hanif, U.; Ali, J.; Ishtiaq, S. Pharmacognostic studies of stem, roots and leaves of Malva parviflora L. Asian Pac. J. Trop. Biomed. 2014, 4, 410–415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. El Khoury, M.; Haykal, T.; Hodroj, M.H.; Abou Najem, S.; Sarkis, R.; Taleb, R.I.; Rizk, S. Malva pseudolavatera Leaf Extract Promotes ROS Induction Leading to Apoptosis in Acute Myeloid Leukemia Cells In Vitro. Cancers 2020, 12, 435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Jabri, M.-A.; Wannes, D.; Hajji, N.; Sakly, M.; Marzouki, L.; Sebai, H. Role of laxative and antioxidant properties of Malva sylvestris leaves in constipation treatment. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2017, 89, 29–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Romitelli, I.; Martins, M.B.G. Comparison of leaf morphology and anatomy among Malva sylvestris (“Gerânio-aromático”), Pelargonium graveolens (“Falsa-malva”) and Pelargonium odoratissimum (“Gerânio-de-cheiro”). Rev. Bras. Plantas Med. 2013, 15, 91–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Sarmiento-Tomalá, G.; Santos-Ordóñez, E.; Miranda-Martínez, M.; Pacheco-Coello, R.; Scull-Lizama, R.; Gutiérrez-Gaitén, Y.; Delgado Hernández, R.R. Molecular barcode and morphology analysis of Malva pseudolavatera Webb & Berthel and Malva sylvestris L. from Ecuador. Biodivers. J. Biol. Divers. 2022, 21, 3554–3561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Liu, Y.; Wang, J.; Kang, H. Random Amplified Polymorphic DNA profiling in detecting genetic variation in Malva L. species: Edible and medicinal plants. Caryologia 2022, 75, 77–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Blunden, G.; Patel, A.V.; Armstrong, N.J.; Gorham, J. Betaine distribution in the Malvaceae. Phytochemistry 2001, 58, 451–454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Baum, D.A.; DeWitt Smith, S.; Yen, A.; Alverson, W.S.; Nyffeler, R.; Whitlock, B.A.; Oldham, R.L. Phylogenetic relationships of Malvatheca (Bombacoideae and Malvoideae; Malvaceae sensu lato) as inferred from plastid DNA sequences. Am. J. Bot. 2004, 91, 1863–1871. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Qadir, S.A.; Noori Meerza, C.H.; Faraj, A.M.; Hamafaraj, K.K.; Abdalla Tobakari, S.R.; Hamarashid, S.H. Comparative study and genetic diversity in Malva using srap molecular markers. Caryologia 2022, 75, 101–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. García, P.E.; Schönswetter, P.; Aguilar, J.F.; Feliner, G.N.; Schneeweiss, G.M. Five molecular markers reveal extensive morphological homoplasy and reticulate evolution in the Malva alliance (Malvaceae). Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2009, 50, 226–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Bianco, M.L.; Grillo, O.; Garcia, P.E.; Mascia, F.; Venora, G.; Bacchetta, G. Morpho-colorimetric characterisation of Malva alliance taxa by seed image analysis. Plant Biol. 2016, 19, 90–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Rovner, I.; Gyulai, F. Computer-assisted morphometry: A new method for assessing and distinguishing morphological variation in wild and domestic seed populations. Econ. Bot. 2007, 61, 154–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Hannachi, H.; Gómez Martín, J.J.; Saadaoui, E.; Cervantes, E. Stone diversity in wild and cultivated olive trees (Olea europaea L.). Dendrobiology 2017, 77, 19–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Ahmad, F.; Hameed, M.; Ahmad, M.S.A. Taxonomic significance of palynological studies for identification of two morphologically similar Malva species. Microsc. Res. Tech. 2022, 85, 2826–2834. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Bacchetta, G.; García, P.E.; Grillo, O.; Mascia, F.; Venora, G. Seed image analysis provides evidence of taxonomical differentiation within the Lavatera triloba aggregate (Malvaceae). Flora–Morphol. Distrib. Funct. Ecol. Plants 2011, 206, 468–472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Parimalan, R.; Mahendranath, G.; Giridhar, P. Analysis of water soluble polysaccharides as a potential chemotaxonomic marker for landraces in Bixa orellana. Indian J. Biochem. Biophys. 2014, 51, 81–86. [Google Scholar]
  19. Hannachi, H.; Breton, C.; El Gazzah, M.; Msallem, M.; Ben El Hadj, S.; Bervillé, A. Differences between native and introduced olive cultivars as revealed by morphology of drupes, oil composition and SSR polymorphisms: A case study in Tunisia. Sci. Hortic. 2008, 116, 280–290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Erarslan, Z.B.; Koçyiğit, M. The important taxonomic characteristics of the family Malvaceae and the herbarium specimens in ISTE. Turk. J. Biosci. Collect. 2019, 3, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Da Silva, A.C.O.; De Oliveira, A.F.M.; Dos Santos, D.Y.A.C.; Da Silva, S.I. An approach to chemotaxonomy to the fatty acid content of some Malvaceae species. Biochem. Syst. Ecol. 2010, 38, 1035–1038. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Lin, D.; Xiao, M.; Zhao, J.; Li, Z.; Xing, B.; Li, X.; Kong, M.; Li, L.; Zhang, Q.; Liu, Y.; et al. An overview of plant phenolic compounds and their importance in human nutrition and management of type 2 diabetes. Molecules 2019, 21, 1374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Gonzalez, S.; Fernandez, M.; Cuervo, A.; Lasheras, C. Dietary intake of polyphenols and major food sources in an institutionalised elderly population. J. Hum. Nutr. Diet. 2014, 27, 176–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Ghédira, K.; Goetz, P. Malva sylvestris L. (Malvaceae): Mauve. Phytotherapie 2016, 14, 68–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Mohammed, C.B.; Chahid, B.; Fatima, B.; Fatima-Zohra, S.; Meriem, B.; Farid, C. Antioxidant activity, phenolic and flavonoid content in leaves, flowers, stems and seeds of mallow (Malva sylvestris L.) from North Western of Algeria. Afr. J. Biotechnol. 2014, 13, 486–491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Mustafa, A.; Ali, M. Comparative phyto and physico-chemical standardization of fresh and different market samples with the anti-inflammatory studies of fruit parts of Malva sylvestris L. Res. J. Pharmacol. Pharmacodyn. 2022, 14, 219–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Aboukhalaf, A.; Tbatou, M.; Kalili, A.; Naciri, K.; Moujabbir, S.; Sahel, K.; Rocha, J.M.; Belahsen, R. Traditional knowledge and use of wild edible plants in Sidi Bennour region (Central Morocco). Ethnobot. Res. Appl. 2022, 23, 265–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Naser, E.H.; Mahdi, L.S.; Alasadi, R.T. Phytochemical constituents and pharmacological activity of Malva parviflora plant: A review. Sci. J. Med. Res. 2022, 23, 35–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Altyar, A.E.; Munir, A.; Ishtiaq, S.; Rizwan, M.; Abbas, K.; Kensara, O.; Elhady, S.S.; Rizg, W.Y.; Youssef, F.S.; Ashour, M.L. Malva parviflora leaves and fruits mucilage as natural sources of anti-inflammatory, antitussive and gastro-protective agents: A comparative study using rat models and Gas chromatography. Pharmaceuticals 2022, 15, 427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Gautam, S.S.; Navneet, K.S. Screening of antibacterial and phytochemical constituents of Malva parviflora Linn. fruit extracts against respiratory tract pathogens. Res. Plant Biol. 2018, 8, 13–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Elfalleh, W.; Nasri, N.; Marzougui, N.; Thabti, I.; M’rabet, A.; Yahya, Y.; Lachiheb, B.; Guasmi, F.; Ferchichi, A. Physico-chemical properties and DPPH-ABTS scavenging activity of some local pomegranate (Punica granatum) ecotypes. Int. J. Food Sci. Nutr. 2009, 60, 197–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Kayel, I.; Essghaier, B.; Benabderrahim, M.A.; Rodríguez-Arcos, R.; Jiménez-Araujo, A.; Guillén-Bejarano, R.; Hannachi, H. Three Mediterranean species from natural plant communities (Ceratonia siliqua, Pistacia lentiscus, and Olea europaea var. sylvestris): Phenolic acids, flavonoids, and biological activities. S. Afr. J. Bot. 2024, 175, 620–627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Türker, M.; Dalar, A. In vitro antioxidant and enzyme inhibitory properties and phenolic composition of M. neglecta Wallr. (Malvaceae) fruit: A traditional medicinal fruit from Eastern Anatolia. Ind. Crop. Prod. 2013, 51, 376–380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Miller, H.; Rigelhof, F.; Marquart, L.; Prakash, A.; Kanter, M. Whole-grain products and antioxidants. Cereal Foods World 2000, 45, 5963. [Google Scholar]
  35. Chew, Y.-L.; Goh, J.-K.; Lim, Y.-Y. Assessment of in Vitro Antioxidant Capacity and Polyphenolic Composition of Selected Medicinal Herbs from Leguminosae Family in Peninsular Malaysia. Food Chem. 2009, 116, 13–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Cervantes, E.; Martín, J.J.; Saadaoui, E. Updated methods for seed shape analysis. Scientifica 2016, 2016, 5691825. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Dong, R.; Guo, Q.; Li, H.; Li, J.; Zuo, W.; Long, C. Estimation of morphological variation in seed traits of Sophora moorcroftiana using digital image analysis. Front. Plant Sci. 2023, 14, 1185393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Vazquez, D.V.; Spetale, F.E.; Nankar, A.N.; Grozeva, S.; Rodríguez, G.R. Machine Learning-Based Tomato Fruit Shape Classification System. Plants 2024, 13, 2357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Pottier-Alapetite, G. Flore de la Tunisie: Angiospermes-dicotylédones. Apétales-Dialypétales. Gamopétales; The Ministère de l’Enseignement Supérieur et de la Recherche Scientifique et le Ministère de l’Agriculture: Paris, France, 1981; pp. 665–1191. [Google Scholar]
  40. Bettaieb, I.; Benabderrahim, M.A.; Guillén-Bejarano, R.; Rodríguez-Arcos, R.; Jiménez-Araujo, A.; Bouaine, M.; Ghorbal, A.; Elfalleh, W. The effect of freeze-drying process and arabica coffee enrichment on bioactive content, aroma volatile, and sensory characteristics of date seed coffee. Food Biosci. 2024, 57, 103473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Soumaya, G.; Hédia, H.; Mouhiba, B.N.A. Morphological, physiological, and biochemical responses of Tunisian Urtica pilulifera L. under salt constraint. S. Afr. J. Bot. 2021, 142, 124–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Prieto, P.; Pineda, M.; Aguilar, M. Spectrophotometric quantitation of antioxidant capacity through the formation of a phosphomolybdenum complex: Specific application to the determination of vitamin E. Anal. Biochem. 1999, 269, 337–341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Hammami, N.; Benabderrahim, M.A.; Hannachi, H. Modeling approach of allelopathy efect of Urospermum dalechampii and Andryala integrifolia on lettuce-seed germination and seedling growth. Euro-Mediterr. J. Environ. Integr. 2024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Felix, F.C.; Kratz, D.; Ribeiro, R.; Nogueira, A.C. Characterization and differentiation of forest species by seed image analysis: A new methodological approach. Ciência Florest. 2023, 33, e73427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Polyphenols, flavonoids, soluble sugar, and starch contents of Malva fruits from the three studied species. (a): Total polyphenols content (TPC expressed as mg gallic acid equivalent per g dry matter) and total flavonoid content (TFC expressed as mg rutin equivalent per g dry matter); (b): soluble sugar and starch contents in mg per g dry matter. Different letters for the same content data showed significant difference at p < 0.05 using Duncan’s test.
Figure 1. Polyphenols, flavonoids, soluble sugar, and starch contents of Malva fruits from the three studied species. (a): Total polyphenols content (TPC expressed as mg gallic acid equivalent per g dry matter) and total flavonoid content (TFC expressed as mg rutin equivalent per g dry matter); (b): soluble sugar and starch contents in mg per g dry matter. Different letters for the same content data showed significant difference at p < 0.05 using Duncan’s test.
Plants 14 00930 g001
Figure 2. Protein, oil, carbon, and nitrogen contents of Malva fruits from the three studied species. (a): Proteins and oil contents in percentage; (b): carbon and nitrogen contents in percentage. Different letters for the same content data showed significant difference at p < 0.05 using Duncan’s test.
Figure 2. Protein, oil, carbon, and nitrogen contents of Malva fruits from the three studied species. (a): Proteins and oil contents in percentage; (b): carbon and nitrogen contents in percentage. Different letters for the same content data showed significant difference at p < 0.05 using Duncan’s test.
Plants 14 00930 g002
Figure 3. Principal component plot defined by the two first axes (PC1 and PC2) of principal component analysis applied on morphometry, texture, and phytochemical data of fruit from Malva species: M. multiflora, M. parviflora, and M. sylvestris.
Figure 3. Principal component plot defined by the two first axes (PC1 and PC2) of principal component analysis applied on morphometry, texture, and phytochemical data of fruit from Malva species: M. multiflora, M. parviflora, and M. sylvestris.
Plants 14 00930 g003
Figure 4. A summary of the method used to determine the morphometry of M. parviflora fruit. (a): Fruits image obtained by scanning; (b): basic image; (c): binary image; (d): profiles projections of fruits. The horizontal line shows the scale which corresponds to 1 cm.
Figure 4. A summary of the method used to determine the morphometry of M. parviflora fruit. (a): Fruits image obtained by scanning; (b): basic image; (c): binary image; (d): profiles projections of fruits. The horizontal line shows the scale which corresponds to 1 cm.
Plants 14 00930 g004
Figure 5. Phenotype of Malva fruits of the studied three species: M. multiflora (a), M. sylvestris (b), and M. Parviflora (c), as well as schematic morphometry parameters applied on Malva fruits (d) (m: mericarp).
Figure 5. Phenotype of Malva fruits of the studied three species: M. multiflora (a), M. sylvestris (b), and M. Parviflora (c), as well as schematic morphometry parameters applied on Malva fruits (d) (m: mericarp).
Plants 14 00930 g005
Table 1. Antioxidant activity of fruit extract from three Malva species.
Table 1. Antioxidant activity of fruit extract from three Malva species.
TAA
(mg AAE/g DM)
FRAP
(% RP)
DPPH (IC50)
(mg/mL)
M. mulriflora22.01 ± 0.86 a58.81 ± 0.006 a0.20 ± 0.00 c
M. parviflora11.47 ± 2.02 b42.26 ± 0.022 c0.01 ± 0.00 a
M. sylvestris12.04 ± 0.94 b49.21 ± 0.047 b0.02 ± 0.00 b
TAA: total antioxidant activity; AAE: ascorbic acid equivalent; DM: dry matter; RP: reductor power. Different letters in the same column showed significant difference at p < 0.05 using Duncan’s test.
Table 2. Parameters related to size, shape, and texture features of M. multiflora, M. parviflora, and M. sylvestris fruits.
Table 2. Parameters related to size, shape, and texture features of M. multiflora, M. parviflora, and M. sylvestris fruits.
M. multifloraM. parvifloraM. sylvestris
Morphometry parameters
Area60.46 ± 5.91 a30.00 ±3.37 c42.27 ± 5.17 b
Perimeter28.69 ± 1.48 a21.15 ± 1.16 c24.87 ± 1.47 b
Width8.74 ± 0.39 a6.14 ± 0.40 c7.28 ± 0.50 b
Height 9.14 ± 0.34 a6.40 ±0.35 c7.55 ± 0.48 b
AR1.10 ± 0.03 a1.13 ± 0.02 a1.12 ± 0.08 a
Major9.26 ± 0.42 a6.54 ± 0.36 a7.72 ± 0.49 b
Minor8.38 ± 0.30 a5.81 ± 0.35 c6.93 ± 0.45 b
Angle61.31 ± 21.04 a62.00 ± 7.95 a59.67 ± 10.28 a
Circularity 0.92 ± 0.02 a0.84 ± 0.04 c0.87 ± 0.04 b
Feret 9.82 ± 0.43 a6.73 ± 0.39 c7.99 ± 0.50 b
FeretX coordinates 119.40 ± 82.95 b329.90 ± 214.08 a400.50 ± 279.55 a
FeretY coordinates 121.57 ± 63.05 b413.67 ± 216.76 a457.83 ± 233.90 a
Feret Angle 58.20 ± 23.13 a59.78 ± 15.11 a57.50 ± 23.24 a
MinFeret 8.65 ± 0.35 a5.94 ±0.33 c7.06 ± 0.43 b
Roundness index0.91 ± 0.03 a0.87 ± 0.07 b0.89 ± 0.06 ab
Solidity 0.94 ± 0.01 b0.96 ± 0.01 a0.96 ± 0.03 a
Texture features
Mean of gray values87.17 ± 5.93 b89.34 ± 5.01 b115.38 ±19.15 a
Standard deviation29.02 ± 3.79 a24.42 ± 2.93 b24.68 ±7.92 b
Integrated Density5493.17 ± 559.15 a2949.85 ± 311.74 c4677.07 ± 722.61 b
Mode of gray value87.10 ± 9.27 b88.77 ± 8.73 b124.64 ± 7.37 a
Minimum of gray value30.47 ± 9.65 a20.08 ± 10.11 b25.42 ± 11.71 a
Maximum of gray value165.67 ± 0.71 b170.00 ± 0.00 a165.03 ± 0.19 c
Skewness0.67 ± 0.37 b1.17 ± 0.51 a−0.73 ±0.82 c
Kurtosis0.39 ± 0.68 b1.62 ± 0.97 a2.33 ± 0.49 a
Different letters in the same line showed significant difference at p < 0.05 using Duncan’s test
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Rhimi, F.; Rejili, M.; Benabderrahim, M.A.; Hannachi, H. Diversity of Phytochemical Content, Antioxidant Activity, and Fruit Morphometry of Three Mallow, Malva Species (Malvaceae). Plants 2025, 14, 930. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants14060930

AMA Style

Rhimi F, Rejili M, Benabderrahim MA, Hannachi H. Diversity of Phytochemical Content, Antioxidant Activity, and Fruit Morphometry of Three Mallow, Malva Species (Malvaceae). Plants. 2025; 14(6):930. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants14060930

Chicago/Turabian Style

Rhimi, Faten, Mokhtar Rejili, Mohamed Ali Benabderrahim, and Hédia Hannachi. 2025. "Diversity of Phytochemical Content, Antioxidant Activity, and Fruit Morphometry of Three Mallow, Malva Species (Malvaceae)" Plants 14, no. 6: 930. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants14060930

APA Style

Rhimi, F., Rejili, M., Benabderrahim, M. A., & Hannachi, H. (2025). Diversity of Phytochemical Content, Antioxidant Activity, and Fruit Morphometry of Three Mallow, Malva Species (Malvaceae). Plants, 14(6), 930. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants14060930

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop