Next Article in Journal
Evaluating the Role of Tobacco Stalk Biochar in Wheat Growth Under Microplastic Exposure
Previous Article in Journal
Pollen Viability and Anomalies in European Hazelnut: Cultivar Traits or Environmental Effect?
Previous Article in Special Issue
Spatial Distribution Patterns of Dominant Tree Species and Their Associations with Soil Factors in Subalpine Secondary Forests of Western Sichuan
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Communication

Molecular Mechanisms Underlying Flower Bud Differentiation in Osmanthus fragrans Lour.

Co-Innovation Center for Sustainable Forestry in Southern China, College of Life Sciences, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210037, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Plants 2025, 14(23), 3577; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants14233577 (registering DOI)
Submission received: 12 October 2025 / Revised: 15 November 2025 / Accepted: 18 November 2025 / Published: 23 November 2025

Abstract

Osmanthus fragrans, an evergreen tree or shrub belonging to the Oleaceae family, is widely utilized in landscaping, food processing, and the fragrance industry for its unique aroma and ornamental values. Through natural and artificial selection, O. fragrans has diverged into two horticultural groups: the Asiaticus Group, which blooms year-round, and the Autumn Flowering Group, characterized by concentrated flowering in autumn. This phenotypic diversity is paramount importance for enhancing landscape value, extending the harvest periods, and meeting commercial demands. However, current research on flowering period differences among O. fragrans cultivars primarily focuses on physiological traits such as flower bud differentiation and phenological traits, with limited studies at the genetic and molecular levels. This article summarized the research progress in the classification characteristics, flower bud differentiation stages and processes, and the molecular mechanisms of flowering in O. fragrans, with a particular emphasis on the key genes that influence environmental factors such as high temperature, low temperature, and drought on the flowering period, and the regulatory mechanisms underlying the repeated flowering of the Asiaticus Group. The aim is to provide a theoretical foundation for breeding new cultivars with varied flowering times. Future research on O. fragrans will employ multi-omics technologies to systematically elucidate the key genes, signaling pathways, and epigenetic networks that regulate flower bud differentiation. A primary objective is to elucidate the synergistic interactions between environmental factors and endogenous hormones, thereby establishing precise models for flowering regulation and guiding practical production applications of O. fragrans.

1. Introduction

Osmanthus fragrans, commonly referred to as sweet Osmanthus, is a plant classified within the genus Osmanthus of the Oleaceae family. It is one of Chinese top ten traditionally famous flowers, valued for its edible, medicinal, and ornamental properties, leading to its extensive use across various applications. O. fragrans embodies significant traditional Chinese cultural values, and has a long history of cultivation. Historical records indicate that the cultivation can be traced back to the Spring and Autumn and Warring States periods (ca. 3rd century BCE). Throughout the history of Chinese literature, it has been frequently celebrated in both poetry and prose, establishing itself as a distinctive cultural symbol. In the contemporary era, it embodies friendship, honor, and auspiciousness, with its cultural significance permeating areas such as cultivation, landscaping, and folk traditions. In medicinal applications, the Dictionary of Chinese Medicine records that its roots, branches, flowers, and fruits can be utilized as herbal remedies to dispel dampness and cold, resolve phlegm, and disperse blood stasis. It has been employed to alleviate conditions such as wheezing and cough induced by phlegm, as well as intestinal wind and dysentery [1]. In culinary contexts, the flowers of O. fragrans have a long history as an ingredient in food products. Items such as Osmanthus tea and cake are widely appreciated for their distinctive flavors. These flowers contain various secondary metabolites, and their acetone extract exhibits antioxidant and preservative properties that contribute to delaying skin aging. In landscaping applications, different cultivars of O. fragrans are esteemed for their elegant form, rich fragrance, and auspicious symbolism, making them common choices in horticultural design [2].
With a cultivation history of over 2500 years in China, O. fragrans is widely cultivated in the regions of south of the Qin-ling Mountains–Huai River, where it has established five principal production areas: Xianning city in Hubei Province, Chengdu city in Sichuan Province, Hangzhou city in Zhejiang Province, Suzhou city in Jiangsu Province, and Guilin in Guangxi Province. Furthermore, it has been designated as the city flower in 26 cities throughout China [3,4]. Throughout prolonged cultivation, O. fragrans has developed numerous intraspecific variations due to artificial selection, natural hybridization, and environmental factors, resulting in the formation or breeding of many cultivars. Cultivated varieties of O. fragrans can be classified into four cultivar groups based on distinct characteristics such as flowering season, inflorescence type, and flower color (Figure 1). The primary classification criterion is the flowering season, which divides the specimens into the Autumn Flowering Group and the Asiaticus Group. The secondary criterion is flower color, which further categorizes them into the Albus Group, Luteus Group, and Aurantiacus Group, thus establishing a total of four cultivar groups [5,6].
Nevertheless, the molecular mechanisms underlying the flowering differences between the Asiaticus Group and the Autumn Flowering Group remain inadequately understood. Current research on variations in floral phenology among Osmanthus cultivars have primarily focused on physiological aspects, including flower bud differentiation and blooming phenology. However, the precise regulatory mechanisms governing flower bud differentiation and blooming processes, along with their coordinated interactions with environmental factors, have yet to be thoroughly elucidated. This limited understanding has resulted in empirical approaches for horticultural interventions that lack both precision and broad applicability. Therefore, a more comprehension of the flowering mechanisms in O. fragrans to accurately regulate its flowering period can effectively extend its ornamental duration. This is crucial for enhancing the economic and social benefits associated with landscape aesthetics, ensuring a stable supply of raw materials for the O. fragrans industry, including flower harvesting and processing, and fostering advancements in cultivation techniques.

2. Phenology and Flower Bud Differentiation Characteristics of O. fragrans

Phenology is a discipline that studies the interrelationships between periodic variations in living organisms and environmental conditions. As a significant economic and ornamental plant species, research on the phenology of O. fragrans holds significant implications for guiding cultivation management practices, optimizing flowering periods, and enhancing economic benefits. The flowering period of O. fragrans is typically concentrated in autumn. Through phenological observations of various cultivars, the flowering process could generally be divided into 11 stages: flower bud emergent stage, flower bud bursting stage, ball-shaped stage, top bracts stage, bud-pedicel stage, bud-eye stage, primary blooming stage, pre-full blooming stage, full blooming stage, late-full blooming stage, and flower fading stage [7]. Phenological observations of various O. fragrans cultivars in Nanjing and Kaifeng revealed that the overall flowering period was notably brief, lasting about half a month from ball-shaped stage to flower fading stage, The optimal ornamental period was limited to merely 5–7 days [8].
Phenological observations of O. fragrans reveal cultivar and regional variations in its flowering process, and the meteorological conditions before flowering are the primary external factors regulating the flowering period. Using Nanjing as a case study, Principal Component Analysis (PCA) of the phenological data pertaining to the full-bloom period of O. fragrans, alongside meteorological records from 2000 to 2005 for the 1 to 5 weeks preceding flowering, indicates that the weekly average minimum temperature prior to blooming exerts the most significant influence on the flowering period. A continuous decline in this temperature during the four weeks leading up to flowering promotes flower bud initiation, with optimal conditions occurring when the temperature falls below 18 °C in the week immediately preceding flowering. Appropriate precipitation prior to flowering can enhance air humidity, thereby promoting flowering. However, excessive rainfall tends to delay the flowering period, while drastic fluctuations in temperature adversely affect the flowering process [9].
Flower bud differentiation is a critical transition phase in plants, marking the shift from vegetative to reproductive growth. It involves the transformation of leaf buds into flower buds, followed by the development of floral organs, representing a complex morphogenetic process [10]. Flower bud differentiation is a prerequisite for flowering, and studying its progression is essential for manipulating flowering time, improving flower yield, and enhancing quality [11,12,13]. Current research on the phenotypic aspects of flower bud differentiation in O. fragrans primarily relies on morphological anatomy, tissue sectioning, and microscopic observation. The growth and development of Osmanthus flower buds occur after the maturation of new shoots [14,15]. Studies on the flower bud differentiation process of ‘Jingui’ and ‘Houban Jingui’ indicated that timing and corresponding stages of flower bud differentiation as follows: bract differentiation commenced in mid-April, bract primordia emerged in early May, inflorescence primordia developed in late June, flower bud primordia appeared in early July, sepal primordia of the terminal flower were formed by mid-July, petal primordia progressed from mid to late July, stamen primordia and anthers differentiated between late July to late August, and carpel primordia were established by the end of August. The rate of flower bud differentiation demonstrated a slow-fast-slow pattern [16,17]. Although there were many cultivars of O. fragrans with significant differences in morphological and fertility, the stages of flower bud differentiation were generally similar across cultivars. These stages included initial differentiation, involucre differentiation, inflorescence primordium differentiation, top flower sepal differentiation, stamen differentiation and pistil differentiation stages.
The Asiaticus Group is characterized by its capacity to produce flower multiple times throughout the year and the presence of peduncles, distinguishing it from the Autumn Flowering Group. Research on flower bud differentiation within the Asiaticus Group has been relatively limited. Microscopic observation of the flower bud differentiation process in ‘Ziyingui’ (Albus Group), ‘Dangui’ (Aurantiacus Group), ‘Jingui’ (Luteus Group), and ‘Sijigui’ (Asiaticus Group) revealed that the initiation of flower bud differentiation occurred at a similar time across the four cultivars, but the duration varied among them. Each stage of flower bud differentiation persisted for a longer period in the Asiaticus cultivar compared to the Autumn flowering cultivars. While differentiation had concluded in the Autumn Group, it continued in the Asiaticus Group, aligning with its trait of multiple, sequential flowering events (Figure 2) [18]. Research on the flower bud differentiation of ‘Tianxiang Taige’ revealed three different types of flower buds: normal flower buds, special flower buds, and leaf-like flower buds (termed “taige” flower buds). The morphological differentiation of normal and special flower buds was similar, with both having pistils degenerated into leaf-like carpels. The proliferate-flower bud produced atrophied pistils, which were replaced by meristems that ultimately differentiated into leaves and branches [19,20].
Research on flower bud differentiation of the Asiaticus Group predominantly focuses on the autumn season, with even fewer studies addressing the flower bud differentiation related to its flowering in other seasons. The main flowering differences between the Asiaticus Group and Autumn Flowering Group were as follows: (1) the Asiaticus Group bloomed three times a year, while Autumn Flowering Group flowered predominantly in autumn; (2) the Asiaticus Group underwent three distinct cycles of flower bud differentiation annually, each with varying durations—approximately two months starting in March, two and a half months starting in June, and one month starting in October; (3) during spring and winter, the inflorescences of Asiaticus Group developed at the apex and leaf axils of current-year shoots as panicles, with winter blooms exhibiting peduncles. In contrast, the Autumn Flowering Group produced axillary cymes without peduncles on current-year shoots [21,22].

3. Molecular Regulatory Mechanisms of Flower Bud Differentiation and Flowering in O. fragrans

3.1. Regulation of Flower Bud Differentiation and Flowering by Environmental Factors

3.1.1. Impact of Low Temperature on Flower Bud Differentiation

Negative Regulation of Flowering Repressors by Low Temperature Signals
Low temperature serves as a critical environmental signal for flower bud differentiation in plants, facilitating the flowering process through the regulation of various gene expressions. The SVP (SHORT VEGETATIVE PHASE) gene family, functioning as MADs-box transcription factors, typically played either inhibitory or promotional roles in the temporal regulation of flower development. Studies have shown that low-temperature signals in O. fragrans can promote flower bud differentiation by regulating the expression of the OfSVP4, OfSVP6, and OfSVP7 genes. Under low-temperature conditions, the expression patterns of these OfSVP genes change, which may regulate downstream flower development-related genes such as FT (FLOWERING LOCUS T) and SOC1 (SUPPRESSOR OF OVEREXPRESSION OF CONSTANS1), thereby releasing the inhibitory state of flower bud differentiation and promoting the formation and development of floral buds [23]. Further studies revealed that under relatively low temperature conditions (10–15 °C), OfSVP6 suppressed GA biosynthesis and signal transduction by interacting with the OfDELLA protein in the GA signaling pathway or by regulating genes such as OfGA20ox, and subsequently synergized with the ABA pathway to ultimately delay flowering in O. fragrans [24].
Positive Regulation of Flowering Promoters by Low Temperature Signals
Low temperature stimulation is essential for promoting flower bud development and sustaining flowering in O. fragrans. Several gene families, such as OfSPL (SQUAMOSA PROMOTER-BINDING PROTEIN-LIKE), OfFCA (FLOWERING LOCUS CA), and OfTCP (TEOSINTE BRANCHED 1/CYCLOIDEA/PROLIFERATING CELL), have been identified as participating in the pathway of temperature-regulated flower bud differentiation.
miR156 is a significant microRNA that typically delays plant developmental processes and flowering time by negatively regulating members of the SPL (SQUAMOSA PROMOTER BINDING PROTEIN-LIKE) gene family [25]. In O. fragrans, environmental low temperature significantly inhibited the expression of miR156, thereby relieving its transcriptional repression on the target genes OfSPL6 and OfSPL10, and leading to the upregulation of these two genes. Meanwhile, OfSPL1A, OfSPL5, and OfSPL13 are also involved in growth and development under low temperature conditions, but not regulated by miR156 [26].
FCA is a crucial gene family that regulates self-fertilization in plants, encodes proteins containing RNA-binding domains, and participates in post-transcriptional regulatory processes that influence flowering time [27]. In O. fragrans ‘Yanhonggui’, the expression level of OfFCA gene under low-temperature conditions (19 °C) was significantly higher than at ambient temperature (25 °C), indicating that this gene could sensitively respond to environmental temperature changes, actively participate in flower bud differentiation, and consequently promote earlier flowering time [28].
TCP family genes are essential for plant growth, development, and stress responses. Whole-genome analysis of O. fragrans revealed that Class I TCP genes were involved in organ morphogenesis by regulating cell proliferation and differentiation [29]. Under different temperature treatments (19 and 25 °C), OfTCP5, OfTCP9 and OfTCP12 might serve as key genes responsive to low temperatures in promoting flower bud differentiation in ‘Yanhonggui’. However, the response of OfTCP9 to low temperatures was relatively delayed, with its primary function occurring during the later stages of flower bud differentiation. Furthermore, an analysis of transcriptional activation activity indicated that neither OfTCP5 nor OfTCP12 possessed transcriptional activation activity [30].
Low temperature also induced genome-wide DNA hypomethylation in O. fragrans, particularly characterized by overall reductions in methylation levels across CG, CHG, and CHH sequences. This process was mediated through activation of demethylases such as OfROS1a, which specifically triggered genomic hypomethylation (particularly within CHH sequence), thereby achieving dual regulatory functions: modulating the auxin signaling pathway to promote peduncle elongation, or regulating expression of genes associated with sugar and lipid metabolism as well as temperature response. The dynamic equilibrium between methyltransferases and demethylases maintained methylation homeostasis, collectively facilitating floral induction in O. fragrans [31].
The Effect of Low Temperature on the Petal Formation
Low temperature not only affects flowering gene expression, but also significantly influences structural genes involved in the flowering process. In O. fragrans, the size of adaxial and abaxial epidermal cells in petals at different developmental stages gradually increased during flower opening, suggesting that cell expansion in petals was a major factor in flower opening [24]. XTH (XYLOGLUCAN ENDOTRANSGLU-COSYLASE/HYDROLASES) were cell wall-loosening proteins involved in cell wall relaxation, leading to petal cell enlargement. Among these, a total of 38 OfXTH genes were identified in the O. fragrans genome, with OfXTH24, OfXTH27, OfXTH32, OfXTH35, and OfXTH36 potentially responding to environmental temperature changes to regulate flower opening [32]. Further, in the O. fragrans ‘Yanhonggui’, bHLH79 (BASIC/HELIX-LOOP-HELIX 79) was found to directly regulate the high expression of OfXTH28 to control petal cell enlargement [33].

3.1.2. High Temperature Signals Inhibit Flowering in O. fragrans

In contrast to the promotion of flowering by low temperature, high temperature inhibits flower bud differentiation in O. fragrans. The key gene, OfC3H49, was proved to involve in environment temperature-mediated floral transition through C3H gene family identification and transcriptome sequencing under different temperature treatments in O. fragrans ‘Sijigui’ [34]. The results showed that high temperature directly activated the promoter activity of OfC3H49, and OfC3H49 was regulated by OfWRKY17, inhibiting the floral transition in O. fragrans in response to high ambient temperature. OfC3H49 could directly bind to the promoter of OfSOC1B and inhibited its transcription, while also suppressing the expression of downstream flowering promoters such as OfFT, OfAP1a (APETALA1 a), OfLFY (LEAFY), and OfSOC1B [35].

3.1.3. Impact of Drought on Flowering

In addition to temperature, drought conditions also affect flowering in O. fragrans. The plasma membrane intrinsic protein gene OfPIP2 exhibited significant up-regulation during the flowering period under drought conditions. OfPIP2 increased petal size by regulating epidermal cell size, and the transcription factor OfMYB28 directly regulated the expression of OfPIP2, thereby enhancing the drought tolerance of O. fragrans [36].

3.2. Regulatory Mechanisms of Multi-Season Flowering

Previous research on the flowering of the Asiaticus Group primarily focused on phenological observations and morphological studies. With advancements in molecular biology and sequencing technologies, researchers have commenced the exploration of the regulatory mechanisms and molecular genetic basis underlying its multi-season flowering. Flowering-related genes such as TFL1 (TERMINAL FLOWER 1), SOC1 (SUPPRESSOR OF OVEREXPRESSION OF CO 1), AP1 and BFT have been identified as critical roles.
The flowering genes FT and its homologs TFL1, SOC1, and AP1 were cloned from the Asiaticus Group ‘Fodingzhu’ and the Autumn Flowering Group ‘Yanhonggui’, and their functions were investigated. The results showed that OfTFL1A had very low expression in autumn but significantly increased during the differentiation from calyx to petals in winter in ‘Fodingzhu’. In contrast, OfTFL1B was not expressed during winter floral transition but showed high expression during autumn differentiation. This suggested that the two TFL1 genes in O. fragrans may have distinct roles. The differential expression patterns of OfFT and its homolog OfTFL1 in the Asiaticus Group during autumn and winter may be one of the factors contributing to the varied flowering mechanisms across seasons. Heterologous expression of OfFT, OfSOC1A, and OfSOC1B in Arabidopsis resulted in early flowering phenotypes, further indicating that these genes promote flowering [37].
Transcriptome comparison in the Autumn Flowering Group and the Asiaticus Group showed that OfAP1 and OfTFL1 were identified as candidate genes responsible for multi-season flowering in the Asiaticus Group [38]. Heterologous overexpression in Arabidopsis demonstrated that OfAP1-b1 and OfTFL1-1 promote early flowering, whereas OfAP1-b2 and OfTFL1-2 delay flowering. The different alternative splicing transcripts have distinct effects on flowering time, indicating functional divergence [39,40]. Recently, OfAP1-a was discovered to be regulated by the LFY homolog OfLFY in the Asiaticus Group ‘Sijigui’. Yeast one-hybrid and dual-luciferase assays confirmed that OfLFY inhibits OfAP1-a expression by directly binding to its promoter. Conversely, OfAP1-a can also bind to the OfLFY promoter region and promote its expression. Overexpression of OfAP1-a in Arabidopsis not only accelerated flowering but also altered petal number [41].
Additionally, three floral integrators, OfFT (FLOWERING LOCUS T), OfTFL1, and OfBFT, were revealed significant differences during the floral transition between single-flowering and continuous-flowering varieties of O. fragrans transcriptome analysis. OfFT acts as a flowering activator, while OfBFT functions as a flowering inhibitor. The gene OfSPL8 was identified as a common upstream transcription factor for both, suggesting its important role in regulating continuous flowering [42]. Besides repressing flowering, the OfBFT gene also inhibits the formation of proliferating flowers in O. fragrans. Two distinct floral morphologies, normal flowers and proliferating flowers, coexisted in ‘Tianxiang Taige’. Transcriptome sequencing at different developmental stages of these two flower types revealed significant differential expression patterns of the PEBP family genes OfBFT-a and OfBFT-b, which showed continuous down-regulation during proliferating flower development. OfBFT-a and OfBFT-b directly bond to the promoters of the C-class gene OfAG-a and E-class gene OfSEP3-a within the ABC/DE model, suppressing their expression to regulate carpel development and proliferating flower formation. This provides new insights into the mechanisms of proliferating flower development and floral form breeding in flowering plants [43].

3.3. Molecular Regulation of Flower Senescence in O. fragrans

O. fragrans was an ethylene-sensitive flowering plant, and the senescence of its flowers was regulated by ethylene response transcription factors (OfERFs). Ten OfAP2/ERFs genes were potentially associated with floral senescence. It was discovered that OfERF017 could accelerate flower senescence in O. fragrans by activating the catabolic pathway of organic acids, thereby reducing organic acid levels [44]. Furthermore, OfACO2 (1-AMINOCYCLOPROPANE-1-CARBOXYLIC ACID OXIDASE 2) was identified as a key synthase gene responsive to ethylene regulation in O. fragrans. Its expression was up-regulated during flower senescence, induced by ethephon (which promotes ethylene synthesis), and suppressed by silver nitrate treatment (which inhibits ethylene action), indicating its involvement in ethylene-mediated petal senescence [45].

3.4. Regulatory Mechanisms Influencing Floral Organ Size

Current research on the molecular mechanisms underlying petal size variation in O. fragrans remains limited. In large-flowered cultivars (e.g., ‘Jinqiu Gui’, ‘Dahua Jingui’), the expression level of the GATA transcription factor family member OfGATA9 was significantly higher compared to small-flowered cultivars (e.g., ‘Yu Linglong’, ‘Xiaoye Sugui’). Transgenic analysis demonstrated that OfGATA9 positively regulated floral organ size through promoting cell expansion, providing a theoretical basis for breeding large-flowered O. fragrans cultivars [46].
DELLA proteins negatively regulate gibberellin (GA) signal transduction and influence plant growth and developmental expansion through cellular regulation. In O. fragrans ‘Tianxiang Taige’, ‘Sijigui’, ‘Tiannu Sanhua’ and ‘Rixiang Gui’, a negative correlation was observed between the expression level of the DELLA protein OfRGA (Regulate GA) and petal size. Cultivars with larger petals exhibited lower OfRGA expression levels, suggesting that OfRGA might inhibit petal growth. As a negative regulator in the GA signaling pathway, OfRGA suppressed cell expansion by down-regulating the expression of cell expansion-related genes, thereby modulating floral organ size. This mechanism provided a theoretical basis for flower-type breeding and molecular studies on floral organ development in O. fragrans [47].

4. Conclusions and Prospect

O. fragrans has diverged into two horticultural groups (the Autumn Flowering Group and Asiaticus Group) through long-term cultivation and evolution. This natural speciation with distinct flowering habits provides an ideal model for investigating flower bud differentiation in woody plants. In this article, we summarized the molecular mechanisms focusing on flower phenology, bud differentiation, and key regulatory genes. Physiologically, flower phenology encompasses 11 phases and bud differentiation involves 6 stages, with an extremely short flowering period (≈15 days) and optimal ornamental window (5–7 days). Genetically, confirmed flowering regulators include OfSVP, OfTCP, OfSPL, OfFCA, and the OfWRKY17-OfC3H49 module, with OfCCCH [48] and OfABF [49] as potential candidates. These findings converge on a core “low temperature-induced SVP/TCP/SPL/FCA-FT/SOC1” regulatory model; however, upstream signal perception, cross-pathway regulation, and cultivar-specific mechanisms require further investigation.
Future research should integrate multi-omics approaches and gene editing to unravel the flowering regulatory network, providing a theoretical basis for precise flowering time control and molecular breeding in O. fragrans. Key priorities include: (1) completing genome sequencing of additional cultivars beyond the currently available ‘Rixiang Gui’ and ‘Liuye Jingui’ to advance understanding of Osmanthus origin and evolution; (2) expanding beyond dominant transcriptomic studies to comprehensive multi-omics integration for clarifying agronomic trait mechanisms; (3) establishing efficient stable genetic transformation systems to enable native functional validation, which is more compelling than heterologous validation in model plants; and (4) intensively investigating the molecular regulation of key ornamental and stress-resistant traits.

Author Contributions

Writing—original draft, Q.Y.; Review—editing, M.Z., L.C. and X.W. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant number: 31300558, 32071782).

Data Availability Statement

No new data were created in this study.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Fu, C.C.; Xu, F.Y.; Qian, Y.C.; Koo, H.L.; Duan, Y.F.; Weng, G.M.; Fan, T.P.; Chen, M.X.; Zhu, F.Y. Secondary metabolites of Osmanthus fragrans: Metabolism and medicinal value. Front. Pharmacol. 2022, 13, 922204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Yu, L.L.; Gao, X.Z.; Su, Z.L.; Xiao, S.G.; Zhang, Z.W. Overview of the Application and Medicinal Value of Osmanthus fragrans. J. Hubei Univ. Sci. Technol. 2022, 36, 444–448. [Google Scholar]
  3. Zhao, H.B.; Hao, R.M.; Hu, S.Q. Geographic distribution and population characteristics of Osmanthus fragrans. Acta Hortic. Sin. 2015, 42, 1760–1770. [Google Scholar]
  4. Wang, Y.; Zhang, C.; Fu, J.; Zhao, H.B. Progresses on flower bud differentiation and flower opening in Osmanthus fragrans. J. Zhejiang A F Univ. 2016, 33, 340–347. [Google Scholar]
  5. Zang, D.K.; Xiang, Q.B.; Liu, Y.L. Notes on Cultivar Classification in Osmanthus. Sci. Silvae Sin. 2006, 42, 17–21. [Google Scholar]
  6. Xiang, Q.B.; Liu, Y.L. An Illustrated Monograph of the Sweet Osmanthus Cultivars in China; Zhejiang Science and Technology Press: Hangzhou, China, 2008; pp. 79–260. [Google Scholar]
  7. Yang, K.M. China Osmanthus Anthology; Shanghai Scientific and Technical Press: Shanghai, China, 2005; pp. 33–54. [Google Scholar]
  8. Dong, L.G.; Wang, X.R.; Ding, Y.L. Study on the Osmanthus fragrans blooming season phenology. J. Nanjing Forest. Univ. 2014, 38, 51–56. [Google Scholar]
  9. Hao, R.M.; Zhang, L.; Zhang, M.J.; Xiang, Q.B.; Zang, D.K. Study on key climate factors in fluencing blooming of Osmanthus fragrans at autumn in Nanjing. J. Pl. Resource Environ. 2006, 15, 31–34. [Google Scholar]
  10. Gao, A.L.; Li, J.A.; Liu, R.; He, Z.X.; Sun, Y. Advances in research on flower bud differentiation mechanism in higher plants. Nonwood For. Res. 2010, 28, 131–136. [Google Scholar]
  11. Nagpal, P.; Ellis, C.M.; Weber, H.; Ploense, S.E.; Barkawi, L.S.; Guilfoyle, T.J.; Hagen, G.; Alonso, J.M.; Cohen, J.D.; Farmer, E.E.; et al. Auxin response factors ARF6 and ARF8 promote jasmonic acid production and flower maturation. Development 2005, 132, 4107–4118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Wang, R.H.; Farrona, S.; Vincent, C.; Joecker, A.; Schoof, H.; Turck, F.; Coupland, G.; Albani, M.C. PEP1 regulates perennial flowering in Arabis alpina. Nature 2009, 459, 423–427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Zhou, C.M.; Zhang, T.Q.; Wang, X.; Yu, S.; Lian, H.; Tang, H.; Feng, Z.Y.; Lihova, J.; Wang, J.W. Molecular basis of age-dependent vernalization in Cardamine flexuosa. Science 2013, 340, 1097–1100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Yang, K.M.; Xia, R.M.; Qi, W.M. An investigation and analysis on the cultivars of sweet Osmanthus and their blooming characteristics in Shanghai. Acta Hortic. Sin. 1980, 16, 146–152. [Google Scholar]
  15. Yang, K.M.; Zhu, W.J. Investigation and analysis on ecological factors suitable for sweet Osmanthus. J. Ecol. 1988, 7, 21–25. [Google Scholar]
  16. Wang, C.Y.; Gao, L.P.; Lu, D.F.; Huang, Y.W. A study on morphological differentiation of flower bud of Osmanthus fragrans ‘Houban Jingui’. Acta Hortic. Sin. 2002, 29, 52–56. [Google Scholar]
  17. Wan, Y.X. A preliminary observation on the flower bud differentiation of Osmanthus fragrans. J. Huazhong Agric. Univ. 1988, 7, 364–366. [Google Scholar]
  18. Li, J. Study on Flower Bud Differentiation in Osmanthus fragrans Lour. Master’s Thesis, Henan University, Zhengzhou, China, 30 May 2007. [Google Scholar]
  19. Zhu, Q.; Dong, M.F.; Yuan, W.J.; Sun, B.J.; Shang, F.D. Studies on flower bud differentiation and leaflike proliferate-flower bud of Osmanthus fragrans ‘Tianxiang Taige’. Acta Hortic. Sin. 2012, 39, 315–322. [Google Scholar]
  20. Zhu, Q. Study on the Variation and Evolution of Flower Organs of Osmanthus fragrans ‘Tianxiang Taige’. Master’s Thesis, Henan University, Zhengzhou, China, 1 May 2011. [Google Scholar]
  21. Lu, T.; Wang, Y.G.; Luo, Y.B.; Zhang, C.; Fu, J.X.; Dong, B.; Hu, S.Q.; Zhao, H.B. Comparison on flower bud differentiation and development of different seasons of Osmanthus fragrans ‘Sijigui’. Acta Hortic. Sin. 2017, 44, 1145–1156. [Google Scholar]
  22. Lu, T. Comparison of Flowering Mechanism of Different Seasons in Asiaticus Group of Osmanthus fragrans. Master’s Thesis, Zhejiang AF University, Hangzhou, China, 5 June 2017. [Google Scholar]
  23. Zhu, Y.M.; Wang, Q.Q.; Dong, B.; Zhang, C.; Zhao, H.B. Effect of OfSVP on flower bud differentiation in response to ambient temperature in Osmanthus fragrans. Acta Hortic. Sin. 2019, 46, 1134–1144. [Google Scholar]
  24. Fu, J.X.; Zhang, C.; Liu, Y.C.; Pang, T.H.; Dong, B.; Gao, X.Y.; Zhu, Y.M.; Zhao, H.B. Transcriptomic analysis of flower opening response to relatively low temperatures in Osmanthus fragrans. BMC Plant Biol. 2020, 20, 337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Wang, J.W.; Czech, B.; Weigel, D. miR156-regulated SPL transcription factors define an endogenous flowering pathway in Arabidopsis thaliana. Cell 2009, 138, 738–749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Wu, H.F.; Zhou, M.S.; Zhu, S.K.; Yang, L.Y.; Zhao, H.B.; Dong, B. OfSPLs genes cloing and its expression analysis during flower bud differentiation at different temperature in Osmanthus fragrans. Chin. J. Agric. Biotechnol. 2020, 28, 1390–1399. [Google Scholar]
  27. Macknight, R.; Bancroft, I.; Page, T.; Lister, C.; Schmidt, R.; Love, K.; Westphal, L.; Murphy, G.; Sherson, S.; Cobbett, C.; et al. FCA, a gene controlling flowering time in Arabidopsis, encodes a protein containing RNA-binding domains. Cell 1997, 89, 737–745. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Wu, Q.; Wu, H.F.; Zhou, M.S.; Xu, Q.X.; Yang, L.Y.; Zhao, H.B.; Ding, B. Cloning and expression analysis of OfFCA gene at flower bud differentiation stages in Osmanthus fragrans. J. Zhejiang A F Univ. 2020, 37, 195–200. [Google Scholar]
  29. Zheng, Z.F.; Xu, Q.; Tang, J.Q.; Chen, P.W.; Hu, Z.W.; Ye, Z.S.; Zhao, H.B.; Dong, B. Genome-wide analysis of TCP gene family in Osmanthus fragrans reveals a class I gene OfTCP13 modulates leaf morphology. Ornam. Plant Res. 2023, 3, 15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Zhou, D.; Miao, Y.F.; Dong, B.; Yang, L.Y.; Zhao, H.B. Cloning of OfTCPs gene from Sweet Osmanthus (Osmanthus fragrans) and expression analysis during floral bud differentiation. Chin. J. Agric. Biotechnol. 2021, 29, 1506–1517. [Google Scholar]
  31. Zhong, S.W.; Zhu, H.J.; Li, W.L.; Wu, D.; Miao, Y.F.; Dong, B.; Wang, Y.G.; Xiao, Z.; Fang, Q.; Deng, J.P.; et al. DNA methylome analysis reveals novel insights into active hypomethylated regulatory mechanisms of temperature-dependent flower opening in Osmanthus fragrans. Hortic Res. 2024, 11, uhae010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Yang, Y.; Miao, Y.F.; Zhong, S.W.; Fang, Q.; Wang, Y.G.; Dong, B.; Zhao, H.B. Genome-wide identification and expression analysis of XTH gene family during flower-opening stages in Osmanthus fragrans. Plants 2022, 11, 1015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Miao, Y.F.; Yang, Y.; Zhu, H.J.; Li, W.L.; Liu, X.N.; Zhong, S.W.; Lan, Y.G.; Zhao, H.B. The basic/helix-loop-helix 79 (bHLH79)—Xyloglucan endotransglucosylase/hydrolase 28 (XTH28) regulatory module mediates flower opening in Osmanthus fragrans. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2025, 322, 146633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Ye, Y. Molecular Mechanism of OfC3H49 Gene Regulating the Floral Transition of Osmanthus fragrans in Response to Ambient Temperature. Master’s Thesis, Zhejiang A F University, Hangzhou, China, 7 June 2024. [Google Scholar]
  35. Ye, Y.; Lu, X.K.; Kong, E.; Wang, Q.Q.; Shen, L.X.; Zhong, S.W.; Wang, Y.G.; Xiao, Z.; Deng, J.P.; Zhao, H.B.; et al. OfWRKY17-OfC3H49 module responding to high ambient temperature delays flowering via inhibiting OfSOC1B expression in Osmanthus fragrans. Hortic Res. 2025, 12, uhae273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Lu, X.K.; Kong, E.; Shen, L.X.; Ye, Y.; Wang, Y.G.; Dong, B.; Zhong, S.W. A Plasma membrane intrinsic protein gene OfPIP2 involved in promoting petal expansion and drought resistance in Osmanthus fragrans. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25, 10716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Jiang, Q.N. Isolation and Function Analysis of OfFT, OfSOC1 and OfAP1 in Osmanthus fragrans ‘Sijigui’. Master’s Thesis, Zhejiang A F University, Hangzhou, China, 25 May 2019. [Google Scholar]
  38. Yang, J. Comparison of Structure and Expression Patterns and Indirect Functional Verification of Multi-Season Flowering Candidate Genes in ‘Qiugui’ and ‘Sijigui’. Master’s Thesis, Henan Agricultural University, Zhengzhou, China, 12 December 2021. [Google Scholar]
  39. Xia, H.X. Functional Study of Variable Splicing Isoforms of Multi-season Flowering Candidate of Osmanthus fragrans. Master’s Thesis, Henan Agricultural University, Zhengzhou, China, 2 June 2023. [Google Scholar]
  40. Li, Y.; Xia, H.X.; Cushman, S.A.; Zhao, H.; Guo, P.; Liu, Y.P.; Lin, N.; Shang, F.D. A new mechanism of flowering regulation by the competition of isoforms in Osmanthus fragrans. Ann. Bot. 2023, 132, 1089–1102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Liu, X.H.; Wang, Q.Q.; Jiang, G.G.; Wan, Q.Q.; Dong, B.; Lu, M.; Deng, J.P.; Zhong, S.W.; Wang, Y.G.; Khan, I.A.; et al. Temperature-responsive module of OfAP1 and OfLFY regulates floral transition and floral organ identity in Osmanthus fragrans. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2023, 203, 108076. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Wang, Q.Q.; Gao, G.; Chen, X.; Liu, X.H.; Dong, B.; Wang, Y.G.; Zhong, S.W.; Deng, J.P.; Fang, Q.; Zhao, H.B. Genetic studies on continuous flowering in woody plant Osmanthus fragrans. Front. Plant Sci. 2022, 13, 1049479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Wang, Q.Q.; Chen, X.; Liu, X.H.; Gao, G.; Dong, B.; Wang, Y.G.; Zhong, S.W.; Deng, J.P.; Fang, Q.; Zhao, H.B. OfBFT genes play an essential role in the proliferate flower formation of Osmanthus fragrans. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2024, 208, 108463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Zou, J.J.; Zhang, J.; Wang, X.Q.; Xia, H.; Zeng, X.L.; Cai, X.; Yang, J.; Zeng, J.; Li, Z.Q.; Zhang, G.F.; et al. Comprehensive transcriptome analysis of AP2/ERFs in Osmanthus fragrans reveals the role of OfERF017-mediated organic acid metabolism pathway in flower senescence. Front. Plant Sci. 2024, 15, 1467232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Qiu, H.; Chen, Y.W.; Fu, J.X.; Zhang, C. Expression of ethylene biosynthetic genes during flower senescence and in response to ethephon and silver nitrate treatments in Osmanthus fragrans. Genes Genom. 2024, 46, 399–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Wang, Y.G.; Peng, L.; Chen, Q.; Xia, M.X.; Ning, A.X.; Dong, B.; Zhong, S.W.; Deng, J.P.; Zhao, H.B. A GATA transcription factor OfGATA9 positively regulates flower size of sweet Osmanthus. BMC Genomics. 2025, 26, 859. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Wan, Q.Q.; Lu, M.; Jiang, G.G.; Shao, J.X.; Chen, T.; Yang, L.Y.; Khan, I.A.; Deng, J.P.; Zhong, S.W.; Wang, Y.G.; et al. The characterization of OfRGA in regulation of flower size through tuning cell expansion genes. Front. Plant Sci. 2024, 15, 1502347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Ye, Y.; Cao, S.S.; Shen, L.X.; Wang, Y.G.; Zhong, S.W.; Yang, L.Y.; Xiao, Z.; Fang, Q.; Zhao, H.B.; Dong, B. Comparative transcriptome analysis of CCCH family in roles of flower opening and abiotic stress in Osmanthus fragrans. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 15363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Hong, F.L.; Lu, Y.; Yu, S.J.; Hu, Z.N.; Miao, Y.F.; Zhao, S.W.; Zhao, H.B. Cloning and expression analysis of OfABFs gene in Osmanthus fragrans. J. Zhejiang A F Univ. 2023, 40, 481–491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Four cultivar groups of O. fragrans, (A) Asiatiacus Group; (B) Albus Group; (C) Luteus Group; (D) Aurantiacus Group. Scale bar = 5 mm.
Figure 1. Four cultivar groups of O. fragrans, (A) Asiatiacus Group; (B) Albus Group; (C) Luteus Group; (D) Aurantiacus Group. Scale bar = 5 mm.
Plants 14 03577 g001
Figure 2. The processes of flower bud differentiation of in four O. fragrans cultivars [18]. Note: Stage 1, Initial differentiation stage; Stage 2, Involumcrum differentiation stage; Stage 3, Inflorescence primordium differentiation stage; Stage 4, Top flower sepal differentiation stage; Stage 5, Stamen differentiation stage; Stage 6, Pistil differentiation stage.
Figure 2. The processes of flower bud differentiation of in four O. fragrans cultivars [18]. Note: Stage 1, Initial differentiation stage; Stage 2, Involumcrum differentiation stage; Stage 3, Inflorescence primordium differentiation stage; Stage 4, Top flower sepal differentiation stage; Stage 5, Stamen differentiation stage; Stage 6, Pistil differentiation stage.
Plants 14 03577 g002
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Yang, Q.; Zhang, M.; Chen, L.; Wang, X. Molecular Mechanisms Underlying Flower Bud Differentiation in Osmanthus fragrans Lour. Plants 2025, 14, 3577. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants14233577

AMA Style

Yang Q, Zhang M, Chen L, Wang X. Molecular Mechanisms Underlying Flower Bud Differentiation in Osmanthus fragrans Lour. Plants. 2025; 14(23):3577. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants14233577

Chicago/Turabian Style

Yang, Qinghua, Min Zhang, Lin Chen, and Xianrong Wang. 2025. "Molecular Mechanisms Underlying Flower Bud Differentiation in Osmanthus fragrans Lour." Plants 14, no. 23: 3577. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants14233577

APA Style

Yang, Q., Zhang, M., Chen, L., & Wang, X. (2025). Molecular Mechanisms Underlying Flower Bud Differentiation in Osmanthus fragrans Lour. Plants, 14(23), 3577. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants14233577

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop