Next Article in Journal
Melatonin Improves Drought Stress Tolerance by Remodeling Lipid Metabolism in Setaria italica L.
Previous Article in Journal
Heterologous Overexpression of Magnaporthe oryzae Effector PWL2 Enhances Rice Blast Resistance via SA-Mediated and PWL2-Derived siRNA Defense
Previous Article in Special Issue
Crop Functional Genomics and Biological Breeding
 
 
Correction to Plants 2025, 14(4), 535.
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Correction

Correction: Jin et al. Resistance Spectrum Analysis and Breeding Utilization of Rice Blast Resistance Gene Pigm-1Plants 2025, 14, 535

1
Institute of Rice, Fujian Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Fuzhou 350018, China
2
College of Agriculture, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou 350002, China
3
Biomedical Sciences, College of Dental Medicine, Western University of Health Sciences, Pomona, CA 91766, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Plants 2025, 14(21), 3313; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants14213313
Submission received: 27 October 2025 / Accepted: 28 October 2025 / Published: 30 October 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Crop Functional Genomics and Biological Breeding)
Error in Figure
In the original publication [1], there was a mistake in Figure 3c as published. Figure 3c was not the correct phenotypic picture of the test series. The corrected Figure 3c appears below. The authors state that the scientific conclusions are unaffected. This correction was approved by the Academic Editor. The original publication has also been updated.

Reference

  1. Jin, Y.; He, N.; Cheng, Z.; Lin, S.; Huang, F.; Wang, W.; Li, Q.Q.; Yang, D. Resistance Spectrum Analysis and Breeding Utilization of Rice Blast Resistance Gene Pigm-1. Plants 2025, 14, 535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
Figure 3. Detection of molecular markers in improved lines and phenotype of blast resistance. (a) The results of Pigm-1 molecular marker detection showed that Xiannuo 23 contained Pigm-1 that had two expected bands of 163 bp and 131 bp, while S19-118 without Pigm-1 had only one band of 163 bp. (b) The greenhouse test results of the improved lines showed that S19-118 was susceptible to rice blast, while R20-4 and Xiannuo 23 were resistant to rice blast. (c) The field test results of the improved line showed that S19-118 was susceptible to, but R20-4 and Xiannuo 23 were resistant to, the rice blast variant Guy 11. (d) Lesion numbers per cm2 on the rice leaves (M ± SD, n > 10 leaves) in (b). (e) The incidence scores of the strains are based on the results in (c), the disease score of S19-118 is 9, while both R20-4 and Xiannuo 23 have a score of 1. Asterisks (**) indicate statistical significance (p < 0.01) determined by Student’s t test.
Figure 3. Detection of molecular markers in improved lines and phenotype of blast resistance. (a) The results of Pigm-1 molecular marker detection showed that Xiannuo 23 contained Pigm-1 that had two expected bands of 163 bp and 131 bp, while S19-118 without Pigm-1 had only one band of 163 bp. (b) The greenhouse test results of the improved lines showed that S19-118 was susceptible to rice blast, while R20-4 and Xiannuo 23 were resistant to rice blast. (c) The field test results of the improved line showed that S19-118 was susceptible to, but R20-4 and Xiannuo 23 were resistant to, the rice blast variant Guy 11. (d) Lesion numbers per cm2 on the rice leaves (M ± SD, n > 10 leaves) in (b). (e) The incidence scores of the strains are based on the results in (c), the disease score of S19-118 is 9, while both R20-4 and Xiannuo 23 have a score of 1. Asterisks (**) indicate statistical significance (p < 0.01) determined by Student’s t test.
Plants 14 03313 g003
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Jin, Y.; He, N.; Cheng, Z.; Lin, S.; Huang, F.; Wang, W.; Li, Q.Q.; Yang, D. Correction: Jin et al. Resistance Spectrum Analysis and Breeding Utilization of Rice Blast Resistance Gene Pigm-1Plants 2025, 14, 535. Plants 2025, 14, 3313. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants14213313

AMA Style

Jin Y, He N, Cheng Z, Lin S, Huang F, Wang W, Li QQ, Yang D. Correction: Jin et al. Resistance Spectrum Analysis and Breeding Utilization of Rice Blast Resistance Gene Pigm-1Plants 2025, 14, 535. Plants. 2025; 14(21):3313. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants14213313

Chicago/Turabian Style

Jin, Yidan, Niqing He, Zhaoping Cheng, Shaojun Lin, Fenghuang Huang, Wenxiao Wang, Qingshun Q. Li, and Dewei Yang. 2025. "Correction: Jin et al. Resistance Spectrum Analysis and Breeding Utilization of Rice Blast Resistance Gene Pigm-1Plants 2025, 14, 535" Plants 14, no. 21: 3313. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants14213313

APA Style

Jin, Y., He, N., Cheng, Z., Lin, S., Huang, F., Wang, W., Li, Q. Q., & Yang, D. (2025). Correction: Jin et al. Resistance Spectrum Analysis and Breeding Utilization of Rice Blast Resistance Gene Pigm-1Plants 2025, 14, 535. Plants, 14(21), 3313. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants14213313

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop