Next Article in Journal
Improving Sugarcane Biomass and Phosphorus Fertilization Through Phosphate-Solubilizing Bacteria: A Photosynthesis-Based Approach
Previous Article in Journal
Seed Size-Number Trade-Off Exists in Graminoids but Not in Forbs or Legumes: A Study from 11 Common Species in Alpine Steppe Communities
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Genome-Wide Identification of the StPYL Gene Family and Analysis of the Functional Role of StPYL9a-like in Salt Tolerance in Potato (Solanum tuberosum L.)

1
Academy of Agriculture and Forestry Sciences, Qinghai University, Xining 810016, China
2
Laboratory for Research and Utilization of Qinghai Tibet Plateau Germplasm Resources, Qinghai University, Xining 810016, China
3
Qinghai Provincial Key Laboratory of Potato Breeding, Qinghai University, Xining 810016, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Plants 2025, 14(17), 2731; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants14172731
Submission received: 22 July 2025 / Revised: 9 August 2025 / Accepted: 27 August 2025 / Published: 2 September 2025

Abstract

PYR/PYL (pyrroloquinoline quinone resistance/PYR1-like) are receptors for abscisic acid (ABA) in plants and play a crucial role in responses to abiotic stress. In this study, we identified 63 members of the StPYL gene family at the tetraploid whole-genome level in potatoes. We analyzed the physicochemical properties of these 63 StPYLs and constructed a phylogenetic tree using Arabidopsis thaliana and potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) cultivar ‘DM’ as the reference. By examining gene structure, conserved protein motifs, and collinearity, we found that StPYLs are highly conserved throughout evolution. The gene expression heat map under salt stress revealed that 57 StPYL genes are involved in the salt stress response. Among them, the expression level of StPYL9a-like changed significantly under salt stress. Through genetic transformation, we observed that overexpression of StPYL9a-like enhanced the growth and survival of potato plants under salt stress compared to the wild type. The contents of proline (Pro), superoxide dismutase (SOD), and chlorophyll in the leaves of overexpressing plants increased, while malondialdehyde (MDA) levels decreased. This suggests that StPYL9a-like positively regulates salt tolerance by affecting antioxidant enzyme activity and osmotic adjustment substances in potatoes. Subcellular localization demonstrated that StPYL9a-like is localized in the nucleus. This study provides a reference for the functional research of PYLs in potatoes, offers a basis for screening potato genes related to salt stress, and lays a foundation for developing salt-tolerant potato varieties.

1. Introduction

Abscisic acid (ABA) is a plant hormone with a chemical structure of C15H20O4 [1]. ABA plays a key role in plant growth and development and plant stress responses [2,3]. In the ABA signaling cascade, PYR/PYL receptors serve as pivotal molecular switches that directly interact with the phytohormone to activate downstream signaling cascades, ultimately mediating ABA’s characteristic physiological responses in plants [4].
At present, PYL family genes have been identified in many plants. For example, 14 PYL genes with highly conserved amino acid sequences have been identified in Arabidopsis thaliana [5]. In rice (Oryza sativa) [6], grape (Vitis vinifera) [7], tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum) [8], rubber tree (Hevea brasiliensis) [9], and cotton (Anemone vitifolia) [10], 13, 8, 14, 21, and 27 PYL genes were identified, respectively. Moreover, PYR/PYL receptors have been widely proven to be closely related to stress physiology, and the functions of some PYL genes have been successfully verified. For instance, overexpression of AtPYL4 enhances drought tolerance in Arabidopsis thaliana [11], while AtPYL8 and AtPYL9 play important roles in the growth of its lateral roots [12]. The overexpression of OsPYL5 in rice can enhance the tolerance of rice to drought and salt stress [13], and the overexpression of OsPYL10 has the potential to improve the drought resistance and cold resistance of indica rice [14]. The overexpression of ZmPYL8, ZmPYL9, and ZmPYL12 in maize (Zea mays) can enhance the cold resistance [15]. In wheat, TbPYL2, TbPYL5, and TbPYL12 were found to potentially play a role in cold stress [16], and BnPYR1-3, BnPYL1-2, and BnPYL7-2 were found in rapeseed to respond to drought, high temperature, and salt stress [17]. Xiaoxia Jia et al. [18] conducted an in-depth analysis of the genome of potato ‘DM-v 6.1’ and identified 17 StPYL genes. The physicochemical properties, evolutionary relationships, gene structures, and expression patterns of these 17 StPYL gene family members under different biotic and abiotic stress conditions were analyzed. The results showed that PYL family members in potato exhibited obvious expression specificity in different tissues (root/stem/leaf etc.). The expression of StPYL1 was upregulated under treatments with exogenous hormones (such as BAP, ABA, and IAA) and abiotic stresses (such as high temperature, high salinity, and drought), indicating its involvement in the regulation of multiple stress responses. Other StPYL members showed functional differentiation and specific responses to different stresses. Protein–protein interaction and microRNA network analyses revealed that the StPYL family participates in ABA signaling. RT-qPCR validation showed that StPYL6 was consistently upregulated under drought, salinity, and Phytophthora infection. While StPYL11 exhibited progressive transcriptional suppression under prolonged stress, some members were coordinately downregulated under both abiotic and biotic stresses [19]. StPYL16 showed a significant response to drought stress: drought enhanced the activation activity of the StPYL16 promoter on the reporter gene, and transient stable expression of StPYL16 in tobacco improved the drought resistance of transgenic plants [20]. At present, the whole genome sequencing of tetraploid potato ‘Qingshu 9’ has been completed [21], which lays a foundation for studying evolution and functional analysis of potato gene family systems using bioinformatics methods.
Potato is an important global food crop with high economic benefits and a wide planting range. Soil salinity is one of the major and widespread challenges in the recent era that hinders global food security and environmental sustainability. Worsening the situation, the harmful impacts of climate change accelerate the development of soil salinity, potentially spreading the problem in the near future to currently unaffected regions [22]. With the aggravation of soil salinization, salt stress has become one of the important environmental factors restricting the growth and production of potatoes [23]. Therefore, it is of great significance to improve the salt tolerance of potatoes. In recent years, there has been a growing body of research on the salt tolerance mechanisms of potatoes. For example, GC-MS-based analysis of metabolite changes in potato cultivars ‘Spunta’ and ‘BARI-401’ revealed that potatoes cope with salt stress through activating antioxidant systems, adjusting metabolite compositions, and remodeling metabolic pathways [24]. A comparison of the physiological responses of two potato cultivars (‘Longshu 5’ and ‘Qingshu 9’) to salt stress revealed that potatoes adapt to salt stress by regulating physiological substances such as soluble proteins and antioxidant enzymes. Moreover, strong Na+ efflux, K+ homeostasis maintenance, and high Ca2+ uptake are key mechanisms underlying the salt tolerance of ‘Longshu 5’ [25].
Although the biological characteristics of the PYL gene family have been explored in several species, studies on tetraploid potatoes remain limited. Therefore, the aim of this study is to identify the PYL gene family in the tetraploid potato variety ‘Qingshu 9’, determine its key functions, and analyze its evolution. To evaluate the role of StPYL in regulating salt tolerance, we assessed the expression changes of PYL genes under salt stress and investigated the role of StPYL9a-like genes in salt stress using genetic transformation studies.

2. Results

2.1. Identification and Phylogenetic Analysis of PYL Gene Family in ‘Qingshu 9’ Potato

This study identified 63 PYL family genes at the whole genome level of the tetraploid potato variety ‘Qingshu 9’. Based on their chromosomal positions, they were sequentially named StPYL1 to StPYL62, as well as StPYL9a-like (Table S1). The amino acid sequences of the StPYL gene family range from 63 to 1033 amino acids, indicating significant differences in protein sequences among family members. The isoelectric points range from 4.71 to 9.01, with 49 acidic proteins. The molecular weight ranges from 6922.17 to 113,128.52, with StPYL35 having the largest molecular weight. The stability coefficients of the proteins range from 25.36 to 58.01, with the instability coefficient of unstable proteins being 41%. The hydrophobicity coefficients range from 0.674 to 0.459, and the lipophilicity coefficients range from 77.29 to 148.57. Subcellular localization predictions indicate that PYL proteins are primarily located in the cytoplasm and nucleus, with less presence in chloroplasts, cytoskeleton, mitochondria, extracellular matrix, and endoplasmic reticulum.
To analyze the evolutionary relationships of the PYL gene family members in Solanum tuberosum, a phylogenetic tree was constructed using 14 Arabidopsis thaliana, 17 Solanum tuberosum (DM) [19], and 63 Solanum tuberosum (Q9) PYL proteins (Figure 1). The 63 Solanum tuberosum PYL proteins were divided into four subfamilies (Group I–Group IV), with Group I–Group IV containing 2, 16,15, and 30 Solanum tuberosum (Q9) PYL genes, respectively. Among them, the 30 PYL genes in Group IV of Solanum tuberosum (Q9) are far away from other PYL genes. Whether they are specific subfamilies of Solanum tuberosum (Q9) needs further verification. Among them, the 30 Solanum tuberosum (Q9) PYL genes in Group IV are not classified into the three Arabidopsis thaliana subfamilies, indicating they are Solanum tuberosum-specific genes. The phylogenetic analysis revealed several closely related PYL genes between Solanum tuberosum and Arabidopsis thaliana, suggesting they may have similar functions.

2.2. Distribution of Potato StPYL Family Members on Chromosomes and Analysis of Gene Structure and Protein Conservation Motifs

The 63 StPYL genes are unevenly distributed across the 30 chromosomes of 48 (12 × 4) tetraploid potato (Figure 2). The highest density of StPYL genes was observed on Chr04_A3 and Chr01_A1, with five PYL genes clustered at either end of these chromosomes. StPYL9a-like is located at the end of Chr08_A1. These results indicate that potato PYL genes are primarily located in the terminal regions of chromosomes, and the number of genes contained in a chromosome is not related to their length.

2.3. StPYL Collinearity Analysis of PYL in Families and Other Species

To further investigate the phylogenetic relationships of the PYL gene family in Solanum tuberosum, this study constructed a comparative homology map of the tetraploid Solanum tuberosum with Arabidopsis thaliana and tomato. The homology between species provides new insights into the evolution and function of gene families. Therefore, we analyzed the collinearity of PYL genes in Solanum tuberosum with Arabidopsis thaliana and Solanum lycopersicum (Figure 3A). The collinearity analysis revealed differences and similarities among the PYL genes in Solanum tuberosum, Arabidopsis thaliana, and Solanum lycopersicum. We conducted collinearity analyses on Solanum tuberosum, Arabidopsis thaliana, and Solanum lycopersicum (Figure 3A). We found that there was a duplication relationship between Solanum tuberosum and Arabidopsis thaliana, but the collinearity between Solanum tuberosum and dicotyledonous Arabidopsis thaliana is lower. Notably, one tomato PYL gene has collinearity with multiple potato PYL genes. In addition, we analyzed the colinear relationship between DM and Q9 four groups of chromosomes (Figure S1). These results indicate that StPYL exhibits strong conservation during evolution, with a more complex evolutionary process in Solanum tuberosum.

2.4. Analysis of Intron–Exon Structure and Conserved Motifs in PYL Gene Family

Intron–exon structure analysis shows that the PYL gene family contains multiple introns and exons. Overall, most PYL genes in the same subfamily have similar genetic structures. An analysis of the structures of 63 StPYL genes revealed structural variations (Figure 3E). Genes on the same branch of the phylogenetic tree show identical or similar genetic structures. In StPYL, introns and exons are alternately arranged in the complete gene sequence. Furthermore, to further explore the structural characteristics of PYL protein, we used the MEME tool to study the divergence of conserved motifs. As a result, 10 conserved motifs were identified and renamed as motif 1–motif 10. An examination of the conserved motifs of StPYL proteins (Figure 3C) indicates that closely related proteins have highly similar motifs. Notably, StPYL24, StPYL26, StPYL45, StPYL46, StPYL47, StPYL54, and StPYL52 contain only one motif, which may be due to the loss of bases during tandem duplication. However, most other StPYL proteins contain eight motifs, with the majority having one, two, three, five, six, seven, nine, and 10 motif structures.

2.5. Prediction of Cis-Acting Elements in StPYLs

Given the critical role of cis-acting elements in gene regulation, we analyzed the promoter region of StPYLs genes. This analysis revealed numerous light-responsive elements and hormone-responsive elements (specifically for jasmonic acid and abscisic acid) (Figure 3D). We studied the distribution of six cis-regulatory elements under non-biological stress in the StPYL gene promoter region (Table S2). The ABRE motif was the most abundant, totaling 134, followed by GT1 (n = 75), CGTCA motif (n = 59), LTR (n = 40), TC-rich repeats (n = 29), and MBS (n = 19). Among these, StPYL9a-like includes ABRE, GT1, and the CGTCA motif.

2.6. Analysis of StPYLs Candidate Genes Under Salt Stress

Analysis of the expression profiles of StPYLs in leaves and roots at different time points using potato transcriptome data shows that most StPYLs are expressed in tissues and organs (Figure 4). The differences in expression patterns are statistically significant. Heat maps of these genes under salt stress conditions show that most StPYLs participate in the response to salt stress. Compared with the control group, 63 PYL expression processing groups showed 29, 22, 25, and 28 differentially upregulated genes in leaves at 3, 6, 12, 24, and 48 h and 22, 14, 27, 30, and 30 differentially upregulated genes in roots at 3, 6, 12, 24, and 48 h, respectively. Among them, the expression of StPYL9a-like shows a regular pattern with increasing salt stress. The expression levels of StPYL9a-like at 3, 6, 12, 24, and 48 h of salt stress show significant changes and they increased significantly most of the time. At 3 h of stress, the expression level of StPYL9a-like increased. At 6 h of stress, it decreases compared to 3 h. From 6 h to 48 h, as the duration of stress increased, the expression level gradually rose. These results indicate that StPYL9a-like plays a crucial role in salt stress and that it plays a positive regulatory role.

2.7. Subcellular Localization Analysis of StPYL9a-like

In order to verify the function of StPYL9a-like, we performed subcellular localization and found that the GFP signal of StPYL9a-like was co-localized with the nuclear localization signal (Figure 5), indicating that StPYL9a-like is localized in the nucleus.

2.8. Overexpression of StPYL9a-like Improves the Growth Traits of ‘Qingshu 9′ Potato

The overexpression (OE) plants of StPYL9a-like showed a significant growth phenotype advantage compared with the wild type (W) (Figure 6A), and their plant height, stem diameter, and the number of leaves were significantly higher than those of the wild type (Figure 6B–D). Among them, the plant height of overexpression line 1 (OE-1) and overexpression line 2 (OE-2) were 1.24 times and 1.09 times that of W, respectively (Figure 6B). The stem diameter of OE-1 and OE-2 were 1.25 times and 1.16 times that of W, respectively (Figure 6C). The number of leaves of OE-1 and OE-2 were 1.89 times and 1.25 times that of W, respectively (Figure 6D). The determination of physiological indexes showed that the Pro content, SOD activity, and chlorophyll content of transgenic lines were significantly higher than wild type, and the MDA content was significantly lower than wild type (Figure 6E–H). Among them, the Pro contents of OE-1 and OE-2 were 1.39 times and 1.37 times that of W, respectively (Figure 6E). The SOD activities of OE-1 and OE-2 were 1.02 times and 1.03 times that of W, respectively (Figure 6F), and the chlorophyll contents of OE-1 and OE-2 were 1.02 times and 1.04 times that of W, respectively (Figure 6G). The MDA content of W was 1.37 times that of OE-1 and 1.18 times that of OE-2, respectively (Figure 6H). The relative expression levels of StPYL9a-like gene in OE-1 and OE-2 were 1.49 and 1.45 times that of W, respectively (Figure 6I).

2.9. Overexpression of StPYL9a-like Enhanced the Salt Tolerance of Potato

To explore the function of StPYL9a-like under salt stress, we treated W, OE-1, and OE-2 with 300 mM NaCl solution. After 2 days, it was found that the leaves of WT wilted and showed partial necrosis, while the leaves of OE-1 and OE-2 only wilted slightly (Figure 7A). This observation shows that the growth potential of WT plants under salt stress is significantly weaker than that of OE-1 and OE-2. To further understand the salt tolerance of transgenic lines, we studied the changes in the physiological indicators of potatoes. After treatment with NaCl solution, the content of Pro and the activity of ROS scavenging enzyme SOD in WT and transgenic potato plants increased. It was found that the increase in enzyme activity in OE-1 was significantly higher than that in WT (Figure 7B,C), indicating that the transgenic plants have stronger osmotic regulation and ROS clearance capabilities. The total chlorophyll, chlorophyll a, and chlorophyll b content of transgenic potatoes under salt stress was higher than that of WT (Figure 7D,E), indicating that transgenic plants could cope with oxidative damage more effectively and maintain the function of the photosynthetic system under salt stress. Furthermore, the MDA content of transgenic potatoes decreased after salt treatment (Figure 7F), indicating that the overexpression of StPYL9a-like enhanced the cell membrane’s ability to resist oxidative damage. These results indicate that the overexpression of StPYL9a-like enhances the salt tolerance of potatoes. These physiological changes synergistically enhance the ability of transgenic potatoes to adapt to salt stress, thereby maintaining their normal growth and survival capabilities. Under salt stress, the expression level of StPYL9a-like in wild type potatoes significantly increased, indicating that StPYL9a-like responds to salt stress. The expression level of StPYL9a-like in transgenic potatoes under salt stress increased more than the increase in wild type potatoes, suggesting that overexpression of StPYL9a-like may enhance the response of potatoes to salt stress (Figure 7G). In addition, when potatoes were continuously and quantitatively watered with 300 mM NaCl for 15 days, the transgenic plants had stronger growth vigor than the wild type, this observation indicates that the StPYL9a-like transgenic plants are more salt tolerant than the wild type (Figure 7H). In conclusion, these results indicate that overexpression of StPYL9a-like in potatoes can enhance the salt tolerance of potatoes.

3. Discussion

Potato is an important horticultural crop; however, salt stress severely restricts its growth and development as well as tuber yield. Therefore, identifying salt-tolerant genes in potato and breeding salt-tolerant potato varieties can not only enhance the resistance of potato to salt stress but also effectively improve the planting efficiency of saline-alkali land. With the completion of genome sequencing of ‘Qingshu 9’, conditions are provided for further study of the tetraploid PYL gene family in potato [21]. The PYL genes play a vital role in the ABA signaling pathway of potatoes, but its role has not been reported in tetraploid potatoes. Therefore, this study identified 63 PYL genes in the tetraploid genome of ‘Qingshu 9’ (Table S1). Compared with the 14 identified species of Arabidopsis thaliana [26,27], tomato [8], and rice [28], the number of StPYL gene family members is larger, and most StPYLs are located in the cytoplasm, which is consistent with the subcellular localization results of AtPTLs reported previously [26]. These genes share a common ancestor and exhibit structural and functional similarities. In terms of quantity, the PYL genes in ‘Qingshu 9’ have undergone significant expansion compared to those in Solanum tuberosum and Arabidopsis thaliana, which might explain its superior stress resistance. In this study, a phylogenetic tree comparing ‘Qingshu 9’ and Arabidopsis thaliana was constructed, revealing that, after diverging from Arabidopsis, potato PYL genes have diversified into a new clade. This expansion of the PYL genes family may be a key factor contributing to the strong stress resistance of potatoes, indicating that PYL genes copy number increase in potatoes is closely associated with potatoes’ stress resistance. Analysis of the gene structures, conserved motifs, and domains revealed that conserved motifs are highly similar and exhibit more consistent distributions within each group, suggesting that although there are variations in PYL gene number among ‘Qingshu 9’ genes, the evolutionary process of their sequences is relatively conservative. With the exception of three genes in group IV, all other subfamily genes have multiple introns, indicating that these genes acquired new introns during evolution, which is consistent with PYL in tomato, rice, maize, and grape [8,29,30]. Promoter region analysis of potato PYL genes also identified a large number of cis-elements related to stress and hormone responses, further highlighting the potential role of PYL genes in stress resistance.
This study revealed the dynamic expression pattern of the StPYL gene family under salt stress through transcriptome data analysis. Among them, StPYL9a-like showed significant time-specific regulatory characteristics. The rapid upregulation of StPYL9a-like after 3 h of salt stress may reflect the early response of plants to salt stress. Existing studies have shown that ABA can bind to PYL, and the complex formed after binding will inhibit the enzymatic activity of protein phosphatase (PP2C), resulting in the activation and release of serine/threonine protein kinase SnRK2. The activated SnRK2 kinase regulates downstream transcription factors or proteins, thereby causing the physiological response of ABA [31,32]. At this stage, the rapid synthesis of ABA may initiate downstream signaling pathways by activating PYL receptors, thereby triggering primary stress resistance responses such as stomatal closure and osmotic regulation [33]. When the plants were under stress for 6 h, its expression briefly declined, indicating that that there might be a negative feedback regulation mechanism. For example, after the ABA signal is overly activated, the receptor abundance is regulated through transcriptional inhibitors (such as miRNAs) to avoid excessive energy consumption or signal disorder [34]. It is notable that as the stress duration extended from 12 to 48 h, the expression of StPYL9a-like continued to rise again, implying that it plays an important role in maintaining long-term stress adaptation. This bimodal expression pattern may be related to the early rapid defense against salt stress and the later steady-state reconstruction [35]. Furthermore, the differential expressions of StPYL9a-like in roots and leaves may reflect tissue-specific regulatory strategies. For example, the root system coordinates ion segmentation (such as vacuole Na+ isolation) by enhancing ABA perception [36], while the leaves focus on stomatal regulation and photosynthetic protection [37].
When exposed to salt stress, plants initiate a series of morphological, physiological, biochemical, and genetic changes to regulate their adaptation to internal and external environments [38,39]. In this study, the growth of OE plants was significantly better under both conventional growth conditions and salt stress, suggesting that StPYL9a-like may help plants resist salt stress to some extent. Proline (Pro) is a widely reported osmotic regulator and signaling molecule that accumulates in plants under salt and drought stress. It may protect plants from such stresses primarily through maintaining osmotic balance, aiding reactive oxygen species (ROS) scavenging, regulating antioxidant metabolites, and modulating components of key antioxidant defense enzymes [40]. In this study, the increased Pro content in transgenic lines under salt stress implies that overexpression of StPYL9a-like might enhance osmotic regulation, ROS clearance, and antioxidant defense capabilities in potatoes, which could contribute to the observed improvement in salt tolerance [41].
Superoxide dismutase (SOD) is a core enzyme in the plant antioxidant system. By catalyzing the conversion of superoxide anion radicals into hydrogen peroxide and oxygen, it may reduce ROS-induced damage to membrane lipids, proteins, and DNA. Elevated SOD activity is often considered an indicator associated with enhanced plant stress resistance [42]. In this study, the higher SOD activity in salt-stressed transgenic lines suggests that overexpression of StPYL9a-like could be linked to improved salt tolerance in potatoes. Meanwhile, the reduced MDA levels might indicate alleviated cellular membrane damage [43]. Under salt stress, the decrease in MDA content in transgenic plants (in contrast to the increase in wild type plants) suggests that OE plants may have experienced relatively less cell membrane damage, implying that overexpression of StPYL9a-like might enhance cell membrane stability.
The retention of chloroplast structure in salt-stressed plants might be related to efficient ROS scavenging by elevated SOD activity. Additionally, the accumulation of non-enzymatic antioxidants such as Pro could directly neutralize free radicals. Furthermore, the reduction in membrane lipid peroxidation (as indicated by lower MDA levels) may reflect decreased cell membrane damage, which in turn might help maintain the structural integrity of chloroplasts [44].
In addition, compared with the wild type, GmLecRlk overexpressing soybean lines had significantly enhanced fresh weight and Pro content as well as reduced MDA content under salt stress. These results show that GmLecRlk gene response to salt stress in soybean [45]. Overexpression of VaPYL4 in Arabidopsis also enhanced plant resistance to salt stress. Physiological analyses showed that transgenic plants had much lower content of MDA and higher POD activity [46]. Our research results are consistent with these studies.
In summary, the results of this study indicate that overexpression of StPYL9a-like significantly enhances the salt tolerance of transgenic potatoes under salt stress. Therefore, we conclude that StPYL9a-like responds to salt stress and positively regulates it under such conditions, offering potential for improving potatoes’ tolerance to salt stress and aiding in the development of new salt-tolerant potato varieties. In the future, we will further elucidate the detailed regulatory mechanisms of StPYL9a-like, including protein phosphorylation and dephosphorylation, protein interactions, and potential protein modifications.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Identification of PYL

The genome sequence of the reference potato genome “Qingshu 9” was obtained [21]. It was obtained from http://bigd.big.ac.cn/ (accessed on 15 November 2024) at BioProject accession PRJCA006096. Using the PYL of Arabidopsis thaliana as a reference, we authenticated the identified potato PYL genes. A total of 14 PYL genes were identified in Arabidopsis. The protein sequences for these coding genes were obtained from Tair (https://www.arabidopsis.org/, accessed on 28 June 2023), and multiple sequence alignments were performed using NCBI BLAST+ (V2.11.0) to authenticate the PYL in the 9th chromosome of the purple potato. The E-value < 1 × 10−5 was set as a significant threshold. In the Pfam database (http://pfam.xfam.org/browse, accessed on 15 November 2024), the HMM file for the Polyketide_cyc2 domain (PF10604) was downloaded, and using HMMER V3.1b2 (http://www.hmmer.org, accessed on 15 November 2024) software, a Hidden Markov Model (HMM) was constructed. The PYL members predicted by PFAM data were combined with those predicted by BLAST to obtain the PYL of Solanum tuberosum. All candidate PYL family gene sequences were confirmed using the NCBI Conserved Domain Database (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Structure/cdd/wrpsb.cgi, accessed on 16 November 2024) and the SMART program (http://smart.embl-heidelberg.de/, accessed on 16 November 2024).

4.2. Construction of Potato PYL Gene Family Tree

The protein sequences of PYL gene family in potato Qingshu 9 were compared using muscle tool (v5.1) [47]. An IQ-Tree (V1.6.12) was used to construct the gene tree [48]. The gene tree was also visualized on the ITOL website [49]. We determined the number of amino acids, isoelectric point (pI), and molecular weight (MW) using the ExPASy website (http://web.expasy.org/, accessed on 29 November 2024). We predicted subcellular localization of candidate genes using the YLoc website (https://wolfpsort.hgc.jp/, accessed on 29 November 2024). We used TBtools software (TBtools-II) to locate gene distribution on chromosomes and employed MCScanx(v1.0.0) for replication analysis of gene families to identify gene duplication events.

4.3. Analysis of Exon-Intron Structure and Protein Conservation Motifs

The CDS sequence and genomic sequence of PYL genes in ‘Qingshu 9’ were compared using TBtools software (TBtools-II) to analyze the exon–intron structure of the gene [25]. Then, on MEMEsuite website (http://meme-suite.org/, accessed on 30 November 2024), the conserved motifs of candidate potato PYL genes were identified, and 10 motifs were set as restrictions [50].

4.4. Collinearity Analysis in PYL

The PYL of Arabidopsis thaliana, Solanum tuberosum (‘Qingshu 9’), and Solanum lycopersicum were analyzed by MCScan (V1.3) software [51]. First, the protein sequences of them were compared using BlastP (V2.10.1+) program with e-value of 1 × 105. Then we used MCScanX to identify collinear blocks with parameter settings of-k: 50, -s: 5, and-m: 25. We used the duplicate_gene_classifier program from MCScanX to classify the copy types of each gene. Information about PYL was extracted from the result file.

4.5. Expression Pattern Analysis of PYL

To explore the gene expression patterns of PYL family genes, we generated three Illumina RNA-seq datasets from two organs (leaves and tubers) of Solanum tuberosum (‘Qingshu9’). Raw sequencing reads were subjected to quality control using FastQC (v0.11.9) to evaluate base quality scores, GC content, and adapter contamination. Low-quality reads (Phred score < 20). Filtered clean reads were aligned to the Solanum tuberosum reference genome (version Q9, https://ngdc.cncb.ac.cn/gwh/submit/27179/step?status=1, accessed on 30 November 2024) using HISAT2 (v2.1.0) with parameters --dta --max-intronlen 5000 to enable downstream transcript assembly. Transcriptome assembly and quantification were performed using StringTie (v1.3.3b) with the --merge option to generate a unified transcriptome annotation, and FPKM (fragments per kilobase of transcript per million mapped reads) values were calculated for each gene using the -e -B flags to quantify expression levels [52]. The expression levels of 63 gene family members are shown in the attached table(Tables S3 and S4).

4.6. Subcellular Localization of StPYL9a-like

The gene cloning vector was detected with PCR using specific primers to amplify the CDS sequence of the StPYL9a-like gene without stop codon. Next, this was ligated into the 35S GFP-1300 RUAN′ vector at the BamHI and SpeI sites to construct the 35S GFP-1300 RUAN′-StPYL9a-like recombinant vector. First, the recombinant vector was transferred into the Agrobacterium tumefaciens GV3101 strain. Subsequently, 5 mL of the recombinant plasmid 35S GFP-1300 RUAN′-StPYL9a-like bacterial culture was transferred into a 50 mL centrifuge tube, and 50 mL of LB liquid medium supplemented with kanamycin and rifampicin (Kan+rif) was added for expansion culture, which was incubated at 28 °C with shaking at 200 rpm until the OD600 value reached 0.8~1. The bacterial culture was then resuspended in MES buffer and diluted to an OD600 value of 0.6~0.8. For the injection solution preparation, acetosyringone (AS) was added at a ratio of 1:1000 (with a final concentration of 100 µmol) and mixed thoroughly. This was followed by mixing the marker and recombinant plasmid bacterial culture at a ratio of 1:3, which was then set aside for use. Five-to-six-week-old Nicotiana benthamiana plants with uniform growth status were selected and irradiated under incandescent light for 2~3 h to ensure stomatal opening. Finally, a 5 mL syringe was used to draw the injection solution, which was then injected into tobacco leaves while avoiding the main veins. The injected tobacco plants were subjected to dark culture for 24 h, after which they were transferred to a light incubator for further cultivation for 48~72 h [53]. Observations were conducted using a laser confocal microscope (TCS-SP8; LEICA Microsystems, Wetzlar, Germany) equipped with a LEICA DFC9000 GT camera. For imaging, the epidermal cells were excited with a 514 nm laser, and the emission signals were collected within the wavelength range of 524~574 nm.

4.7. Plant Materials and Growth Conditions

Potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) cultivar ‘Qingshu9’ (Qinghai Academy of Agricultural and Forestry Sciences, China) plantlets were cut into stem segments in vitro with one or two leaves and were inoculated in Murashige and Skoog (MS) solid medium [54]. The samples were placed in a light incubator at a temperature of 23 °C with 16 h of light and 8 h of darkness and grown for about 21 d for subsequent experiments.
After 21 days of growth, tissue culture seedlings with relatively uniform growth status were selected and inoculated onto MS medium containing 0 mmol/L NaCl (control group) and 300 mmol/L NaCl (treatment group), respectively. There were 6 plants per bottle, with each bottle serving as one replicate, and 3 replicates in total. The plants were arranged uniformly in each medium. Sampling was performed at 3, 6, 12, 24, and 48 h after stress initiation. For both the treatment and control groups, samples from 3 biological replicates were collected separately and pooled as samples for transcriptome analysis.
Next, the Bentham’s tobacco (Nicotiana Benthamian L.) seeds were cultivated in pots (5 × 5 cm) supplemented with nutrients soil and vermiculite with a ratio of 1:1, and the moisture content of the soil was maintained (70~75%). These pots were placed in an incubator with a 16 h light (5000 Lx)/8 h dark photoperiod at 23 °C for three to four weeks for growth [55].

4.8. Cloning of StPYL9a-like Gene

According to the method described in the instruction manual of the 2× Fast Taq PCR Master Mix amplification kit (Takara Biotech, Beijing, China), PCR amplification was performed using the cDNA after reverse transcription of Solanum tuberosum (‘Qingshu 9’) RNA as the template. Primers were designed using SnapGene® 4.2.4, as shown in Table S5. The sequences of the StPYL9a-like gene (ID: XM_006343807.2) was retrieved from the potato database Spud DB (http://spuddb.uga.edu, accessed on 10 November 2023). The coding sequence (CDS) of the StPYL9a-like gene was cloned using the cDNA of potato cultivar ‘Qingshu 9’ leaves as a template. The reaction system was as follows: OE-StPYL9a-like-F 1 μL, OE-StPYL9a-like-R 1 μL, cDNA template 1 μL, 2× Easy Taq PCR Master Mix 10 μL, and ddH2O 7 μL. A list of all primer sequences is shown in Table S5. The samples were pre-denatured at 95 °C for 5 min, and 35 cycles were performed at 95 °C for 20 s, 60 °C for 20 s, 72 °C for 70 s, finally 72 °C for 5 min and stored at 4 °C.

4.9. Real-Time Fluorescent Quantitative PCR Assay

The concentration of cDNA was measured with an Nanodrop one ultra-micro spectrophotometer (Thermo scientific, Beijing, China), and the concentration was diluted to about 200 ng/μL. The qRT-PCR analysis was performed according to the TB Green premix Ex Taq II instructions (Takara, Japan). The relative mRNA expression of the target gene was determined using a qRT-PCR instrument (Roche LightCycler® 96, Beijing, China), and the reaction system was 10 μL of TB Green premix Ex Taq II, 0.4 μL of each forward and reverse primers, 2 μL of cDNA template (200 ng/μL), and 7.2 μL of nuclease-free water. The total reaction system was 20 μL. Furthermore, the reaction conditions were 95 °C for 30 s, followed by 40 cycles of 95 °C for 10 s and 57 °C for 32 s, then 95 °C for 60 s, 57 °C for 60 s, and 55 °C for 10 s. St actin (GenBank No. X83206) [56] was used as the standard reference gene. Three biological replicates and three technical replicates were performed for each experiment, and relative gene expression was calculated using the 2−ΔΔCt method [57]. For qRT-PCR analysis, the specific primers were designed using NCBI’s primer-BLAST online analysis tool (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/tools/primer-blast/, accedded on 29 November 2023). The list of all primer sequences are shown in Table S5.

4.10. Genetic Transformation of Potato and Identification of Transgenic Plants

The coding sequence of the StPYL9a-like gene was amplified according to the designed specific primers (Table S5) and inserted into pJAM1502 vector using Gateway technology. The primary method involves ligating the CDS fragment of the StPYL9a-like gene into the pDONR207 entry vector using a BP reaction, followed by extraction of the pDONR207-StPYL9a-like plasmid. Subsequently, the pDONR207-StPYL9a-like plasmid is recombined with the pJAM1502 expression vector through an LR reaction to generate the pJAM1502-StPYL9a recombinant vector. Detailed procedures refer to the instructions of the Gateway kit (Gateway® BP Clonase™ Enzyme Mix II, Gateway® LR Clonase™ Enzyme Mix II, Invitrogen Biotech, Beijing, China). Agrobacterium suspensions containing recombinant plasmids were cultured in LB liquid medium (containing 50 μg/mL Rif, 50 μg/mL Kan) and activated to OD600 = 0.8. Then, the Solanum tuberosum (Qingshu9) was transformed by Agrobacterium mediated stem method [58,59]. The overexpression lines of transgenic StPYL9a-like were obtained through antibiotic screening and PCR confirmation of transgenic seedlings, and further verified using physiological index determination and qRT-PCR. The transgenic plants were cultivated on Murashige and Skoog (MS) medium supplemented with timentin and kanamycin sulfate [55]. The condition for growth is 25 °C under a 16 h light/8 h dark photoperiod with a light intensity of 10,000 Lx.

4.11. Salt Stress Treatment of Wild Type and Genetically Modified Potatoes

Transgenic lines and wild type potato plants grown for 30 d in MS medium (pH = 6.1) were planted in pots (12 × 12 cm) and supplemented with soil nutrients and vermiculite (1:1, v/v). One day before transplantation, each pot was watered with 200 mL of deionized water to fully moisten the substrate. For WT, OE-1, and OE-2, 2 pots were transplanted for both the treatment group and the control group, with 6 plants per pot. After transplantation, the plants were placed in an artificial climate chamber for a 15-day acclimatization period. The plantlets were cultivated in a climate chamber with a light intensity of 10,000 Lx, a temperature of 24 ± 2 °C, and a photoperiod of 16 h of light and 8 h of darkness. During this period, 200 mL of deionized water was applied every 3 days to maintain stable substrate moisture, avoiding drought or waterlogging. The growth status of the plants was observed daily, and withered or abnormal individuals were removed promptly to ensure uniform plant growth before treatment initiation. Exactly 17.53 g of NaCl (analytical grade) was weighed, dissolved in deionized water, and volumetrically adjusted to 1 L. The solution was stirred until completely dissolved and prepared fresh for use. The treatment group was watered with 500 mL of 300 mmol/L NaCl solution at 9:00 AM daily, ensuring uniform penetration of the solution to the bottom of the substrate (excess solution could drain through the drainage holes at the bottom of the pot to avoid salt accumulation). The control group received 500 mL deionized water at the same time daily under identical environmental conditions. Throughout the stress period, samples were collected daily at 3:00 PM by harvesting the third to fourth functional leaves (counting from the apical meristem), excising petioles, rinsing leaf surfaces briefly with deionized water to remove dust, and blotting dry with absorbent paper. Each sample was divided into two portions: one portion of fresh tissue was used for the determination of physiological indices, while the other portion (leaf segments) was snap-frozen in liquid nitrogen for 5 min and then stored at −80 °C for subsequent RNA extraction/analysis.

4.12. Measurement of Growth and Physiological Indices

The plant height and stem diameter of potato were measured before and after salt stress treatment using a tape measure (precision 0.1 cm) and a vernier caliper (precision 0.1 mm), respectively. The number of leaves was manually counted. The contents of Pro [60] and MDA [61], SOD activity [62], and chlorophyll content [63] were determined using assay kits (Nanjing Jiancheng Bioengineering Institute, Nanjing, China). Specifically, the third and fourth functional leaves of potato were collected, and relevant physiological indexes of these leaves were measured according to the kit instructions.

4.13. Data Analysis

IBM SPSS Statistics 26 was used for significance analysis. Significant differences between the samples were considered when p < 0.05, and Microsoft Excel 2016 was used for data organization and some preliminary analyses.

5. Conclusions

In this study, 63 StPYL genes were identified in the tetraploid cultivated potato variety ‘Qingshu 9’ and were classified into 4 subfamilies. These genes exhibit evolutionary conservation and include potato-specific members. Their gene structures, conserved motifs, and stress-responsive cis-elements (such as ABRE) in the promoter regions indicate their potential involvement in stress regulation. Under salt stress, 57 StPYL genes are responsive, among which StPYL9a-like shows dynamic expression changes and is localized in the nucleus. Genetic transformation experiments demonstrated that overexpression of StPYL9a-like enhances the growth and survival ability of potatoes under salt stress by increasing the contents of proline, superoxide dismutase (SOD), and chlorophyll and decreasing the content of malondialdehyde (MDA) in leaves, confirming its positive regulation of potato salt tolerance. In conclusion, this study provides a theoretical basis for the potential application of PYLs in the genetic improvement of potato salt tolerance, which is of great significance for potato salt-tolerant breeding.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/plants14172731/s1, Figure S1: The Q9 genome was assembled into A1, A2, A3 and A4 haplotypes, each with 12 chromosomes. The central coloured lines represent the synteny amongst A1, A2, A3 and A4 haplotypes orthologous PYL family gene; Figure S2: Cloning of StPYL9a-like in potatoes; Figure S3: Agrobacterium liquid PCR; Figure S4: Agrobacterium genetic transformation of “Qingshu 9”; Figure S5: DNA identification of transgenic StPYL9a-like gene ‘Qingshu 9’; Figure S6: Wild type and StPYL9a transgenic “Qingshu 9” tissue culture seedlings; Table S1: Physicochemical properties of potato PYL genes; Table S2: Cis-acting elements of PYL genes in potato; Table S3: Expression of PYL gene family in potato roots; Table S4: Expression of PYL gene family in potato leafs. Table S5: All primer sequence information used in this article.

Author Contributions

F.W.: Writing-review and editing, Supervision, Funding acquisition, Project administration. C.L.: Writing-original draft, Visualization, Validation, Resources, Methodology, Investigation, Formal analysis, Data curation. Y.B.: Writing—original draft, Visualization, Validation, Resources, Methodology, Investigation, Formal analysis, Data curation. M.X., K.D., L.Z., Y.Z. (Yihan Zhao), Y.Z. (Yifan Zhou), and Y.F.: Validation, Resources. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Genome-wide Association Analysis of Main Agronomic Traits of Cultivated Potato (2023-HZ-807), Kunlun Talent High-End Innovation and Entrepreneurship Talent Leading Talent Project of Qinghai Province, and the earmarked fund for CARS09.

Data Availability Statement

Data will be made available on request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Ohkuma, K.; Lyon, J.L.; Addicott, F.T.; Smith, O.E. Abscisin II, an Abscission-Accelerating Substance from Young Cotton Fruit. Science 1963, 142, 1592–1593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Nambara, E.; Marion-Poll, A. Abscisic acid biosynthesis and catabolism. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2005, 56, 165–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Kumar, M.; Kesawat, M.S.; Ali, A.; Lee, S.C.; Gill, S.S.; Kim, A.H.U. Integration of Abscisic Acid Signaling with Other Signaling Pathways in Plant Stress Responses and Development. Plants 2019, 8, 592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Nishimura, N.; Sarkeshik, A.; Nito, K.; Park, S.Y.; Wang, A.; Carvalho, P.C.; Lee, S.; Caddell, D.F.; Cutler, S.R.; Chory, J.; et al. PYR/PYL/RCAR family members are major in-vivo ABI1 protein phosphatase 2C-interacting proteins in Arabidopsis. Plant J. Cell Mol. Biol. 2010, 61, 290–299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Delgado, R.; Rodrigues, A. Identification and characterization of Armeria maritime PP2Cs and PYR/PYL/RCAR proteins. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2011, 22, S140–S141. [Google Scholar]
  6. He, Y.; Hao, Q.; Li, W.; Yan, C.; Yan, N.; Yin, P. Identification and Characterization of ABA Receptors in Oryza sativa. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e95246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Boneh, U.; Biton, I.; Zheng, C.; Schwartz, A.; Ben-Ari, G. Characterization of potential ABA receptors in Vitis vinifera. Plant Cell Rep. 2012, 31, 311–321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. González-Guzmán, M.; Rodríguez, L.; Lorenzo-Orts, L.; Pons, C.; Sarrión-Perdigones, A.; Fernández, M.A.; Peirats-Llobet, M.; Forment, J.; Moreno-Alvero, M.; Cutler, S.R.; et al. Tomato PYR/PYL/RCAR abscisic acid receptors show high expression in root, differential sensitivity to the abscisic acid agonist quinabactin, and the capability to enhance plant drought resistance. J. Exp. Bot. 2014, 65, 4451–4464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Guo, D.; Zhou, Y.; Li, H.L.; Zhu, J.H.; Wang, Y.; Chen, X.T.; Peng, S.Q. Identification and characterization of the abscisic acid (ABA) receptor gene family and its expression in response to hormones in the rubber tree. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 451–457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Chen, Y.; Feng, L.; Wei, N.; Liu, Z.H.; Hu, S.; Li, X.B. Overexpression of cotton PYL genes in Arabidopsis enhances the transgenic plant tolerance to drought stress. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2017, 115, 229–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Pizzio, G.A.; Rodriguez, L.; Antoni, R.; Gonzalez-Guzman, M.; Yunta, C.; Merilo, E.; Kollist, H.; Albert, A.; Rodriguez, P.L. The PYL4 A194T Mutant Uncovers a Key Role of PYR1-LIKE4/PROTEIN PHOSPHATASE 2CA Interaction for Abscisic Acid Signaling and Plant Drought Resistance. Plant Physiol. 2013, 163, 441–455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Xing, L.; Zhao, Y.; Gao, J.; Xiang, C.; Zhu, J. The ABA receptor PYL9 together with PYL8 plays an important role in regulating lateral root growth. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 271–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Kim, H.; Lee, K.; Hwang, H.; Bhatnagar, N.; Kim, D.Y.; Yoon, I.S.; Byun, M.O.; Kim, S.T.; Jung, K.H.; Kim, B.G. Overexpression of PYL5 in rice enhances drought tolerance, inhibits growth, and modulates gene expression. J. Exp. Bot. 2014, 65, 453–464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Verma, R.K.; Santosh Kumar, V.V.; Yadav, S.K.; Pushkar, S.; Rao, M.V.; Chinnusamy, V. Overexpression of ABA Receptor PYL10 Gene Confers Drought and Cold Tolerance to Indica Rice. Front. Plant Sci. 2019, 10, 1488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. He, Z.; Zhong, J.; Sun, X.; Wang, B.; Terzaghi, W.; Dai, M. The Maize ABA Receptors ZmPYL8, 9, and 12 Facilitate Plant Drought Resistance. Front. Plant Sci. 2018, 9, 422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Liu, X.; Zhao, X.; Yan, Y.; Shen, M.; Feng, R.; Wei, Q.; Zhang, L.; Zhang, M. Genome-wide analysis of the PYL gene family and identification of PYL genes that respond to cold stress in Triticum monococcum L. Subsp. Aegilopoides. Sci. Rep. 2024, 14, 26627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Di, F.; Jian, H.; Wang, T.; Chen, X.; Ding, Y.; Du, H.; Lu, K.; Li, J.; Liu, L. Genome-Wide Analysis of the PYL Gene Family and Identification of PYL Genes That Respond to Abiotic Stress in Brassica napus. Genes 2018, 9, 156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Jia, X.; Qi, E.; Ma, S.; Huang, W.; Zheng, Y.; Bai, Y.; Wen, G. Genome-wide identification and expression analysis of potato PYL gene family. Acta Agron. Sin. 2022, 48, 2533–2545. [Google Scholar]
  19. Gul, S.; Gul, H.; Shahzad, M.; Ullah, I.; Shahzad, A.; Khan, S.U. Comprehensive analysis of potato (Solanum tuberosum) PYL genes highlights their role in stress responses. Funct. Plant Biol. 2024, 51, FP24094. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Yao, P.; Zhang, C.; Bi, Z.; Liu, Y.; Liu, Z.; Wei, J.; Su, X.; Bai, J.; Cui, J.; Sun, C. Overexpression of Potato PYL16 Gene in Tobacco Enhances the Transgenic Plant Tolerance to Drought Stress. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25, 8644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Wang, F.; Xia, Z.; Zou, M.; Zhao, L.; Jiang, S.; Zhou, Y.; Zhang, C.; Ma, Y.; Bao, Y.; Sun, H.; et al. The autotetraploid potato genome provides insights into highly heterozygous species. Plant Biotechnol. J. 2022, 20, 1996–2005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Mukhopadhyay, R.; Sarkar, B.; Jat, H.S.; Sharma, P.C.; Bolan, N.S. Soil salinity under climate change: Challenges for sustainable agriculture and food security. J. Environ. Manag. 2021, 280, 111736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Hamooh, B.T.; Sattar, F.A.; Wellman, G.; Mousa, M.A.A. Metabolomic and Biochemical Analysis of Two Potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) Cultivars Exposed to In Vitro Osmotic and Salt Stresses. Plants 2021, 10, 98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Yang, Y.; Guo, Y. Elucidating the molecular mechanisms mediating plant μm-stress responses. New Phytol. 2018, 217, 523–539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Li, Q.; Qin, Y.; Hu, X.; Jin, L.; Li, G.; Gong, Z.; Xiong, X.; Wang, W. Physiology and Gene Expression Analysis of Potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) in Salt Stress. Plants 2021, 11, 1565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Ma, Y.; Szostkiewicz, I.; Korte, A.; Moes, D.; Yang, Y.; Christmann, A.; Grill, E. Regulators of PP2C phosphatase activity function as abscisic acid sensors. Science 2009, 324, 1064–1068. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Park, S.Y.; Fung, P.; Nishimura, N.; Jensen, D.R.; Fujii, H.; Zhao, Y.; Lumba, S.; Santiago, J.; Rodrigues, A.; Chow, T.F.F.; et al. Abscisic acid inhibits type 2C protein phosphatases via the PYR⁄PYL family of START proteins. Science 2009, 324, 1068–1071. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Kim, H.; Hwang, H.; Hong, J.W.; Lee, Y.N.; Ahn, I.P.; Yoon, I.S.; Yoo, S.D.; Lee, S.C.; Kim, B.G. A rice orthologue of the ABA receptor, OsPYL/RCAR5, is a positive regulator of the ABA signal transduction pathway in seed germination and early seedling growth. J. Exp. Bot. 2014, 63, 1013–1024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Fan, W.; Zhao, M.; Li, S.; Bai, X.; Li, J.; Meng, H.; Mu, Z. Contrasting transcriptional responses of PYR1/PYL/RCAR ABA receptors to ABA or dehydration stress between maize seedling leaves and roots. BMC Plant Biol. 2016, 16, 99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Zhao, Y.X.; Qi, G.M.; Ren, F.S.; Wang, Y.M.; Wang, P.F.; Wu, X.Y. Analysis of PYL genes and their potential relevance to stress tolerance and berry ripening in grape. J. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci. 2020, 145, 308–317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Chen, K.; Li, G.; Bressan, R.A.; Song, C.; Zhu, J.; Zhao, Y. Abscisic acid dynamics, signaling, and functions in plants. J. Integr. Plant Biol. 2020, 62, 25–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Duarte, K.E.; de Souza, W.R.; Santiago, T.R.; Sampaio, B.L.; Ribeiro, A.P.; Cotta, M.G.; da Cunha, B.A.D.B.; Marraccini, P.R.R.; Kobayashi, A.K.; Molinari, H.B.C. Identification and characterization of core abscisic acid (ABA) signaling components and their gene expression profile in response to abiotic stresses in Setaria viridis. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 4028. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Chen, C.; Chen, H.; Zhang, Y.; Thomas, H.R.; Frank, M.H.; He, Y.; Xia, R. TBtools: An Integrative Toolkit Developed for Interactive Analyses of Big Biological Data. Mol. Plant 2020, 13, 1194–1202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Vieira, J.G.P.; Duarte, G.T.; Barrera-Rojas, C.H.; Matiolli, C.C.; Viana, A.J.C.; Campos, R.A.; Canesin, L.E.D.; Vicentini, R.; Nogueira, F.T.S.; Vincentz, M. Regulation of abscisic acid receptor mRNA stability: Involvement of microRNA5628 in PYL6 transcript decay. Plant Physiol. 2024, 197, kiae663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Upadhyay, A.; Gaonkar, T.; Upadhyay, A.K.; Jogaiah, S.; Shinde, M.P.; Kadoo, N.Y.; Gupta, V.S. Global transcriptome analysis of grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.) leaves under salt stress reveals differential response at early and late stages of stress in table grape cv. Thompson Seedless. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2018, 129, 168–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Fu, L.; Wu, D.; Zhang, X.; Xu, Y.; Kuang, L.; Cai, S.; Zhang, G.; Shen, Q. Vacuolar H+-pyrophosphatase HVP10 enhances salt tolerance via promoting Na+ translocation into root vacuoles. Plant Physiol. 2022, 188, 1248–1263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Flexas, J.; Bota, J.; Loreto, F.; Cornic, G.; Sharkey, T.D. Diffusive and metabolic limitations to photosynthesis under drought and salinity in C (3) plants. Plant Biol. 2004, 6, 269–279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Zhu, J.; Hasegawa, P.M.; Bressan, R.A.; Bohnert, H.J. Molecular Aspects of Osmotic Stress in Plants. Crit. Rev. Plant Sci. 1997, 16, 253–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Hasegawa, P.M.; Bressan, R.A.; Zhu, J.K.; Bohnert, H.J. Plant cellular and molecular responses to high salnity. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol. 2000, 51, 463–499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Per, T.S.; Khan, N.A.; Reddy, P.S.; Masood, A.; Hasanuzzaman, M.; Khan, M.I.R.; Anjum, N.A. Approaches in modulating proline metabolism in plants for salt and drought stress tolerance: Phytohormones, mineral nutrients and transgenics. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2017, 115, 126–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Rout, N.P.; Shaw, B.P. Salinity tolerance in aquatic macrophytes: Probable role of proline, the enzymes involved in its synthesis and C4 type of metabolism. Plant Sci. 1998, 136, 121–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Pan, Y.; Wu, L.J.; Yu, Z.L. Effect of salt and drought stress on antioxidant enzymes activities and SOD isoenzymes of liquorice (Glycyrrhiza uralensis Fisch). Plant Growth Regul. 2006, 49, 157–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Yarşı, G. Effects of mycorrhiza, seaweed and bionutrient applied to reduce salt stress on nutrient content, plant growth, malondialdehyde (MDA) and proline in pepper. J. Elem. 2023, 28, 533–545. [Google Scholar]
  44. Arias-Moreno, D.M.; Jiménez-Bremont, J.F.; Maruri-López, I.; Delgado-Sánchez, P. Effects of catalase on chloroplast arrangement in Opuntia streptacantha chlorenchyma cells under salt stress. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 8656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Zhang, Y.; Fang, Q.; Zheng, J.; Li, Z.; Li, Y.; Feng, Y.; Han, Y.; Li, Y. GmLecRlk, a Lectin Receptor-like Protein Kinase, Contributes to Salt Stress Tolerance by Regulating Salt-Responsive Genes in Soybean. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 1030. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Ren, C.; Kuang, Y.; Lin, Y.; Guo, Y.; Li, H.; Fan, P.; Li, S.; Liang, Z. Overexpression of grape ABA receptor gene VaPYL4 enhances tolerance to multiple abiotic stresses in Arabidopsis. BMC Plant Biol. 2022, 22, 271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Edgar, R.C. MUSCLE: Multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. Nucleic Acids Res. 2004, 32, 1792–1797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Nguyen, L.T.; Schmidt, H.A.; von Haeseler, A.; Minh, B.Q. IQ-TREE: A Fast and Effective Stochastic Algorithm for Estimating Maximum-Likelihood Phylogenies. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2015, 32, 268–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Letunic, I.; Bork, P. Interactive Tree of Life (iTOL): An online tool for phylogenetic tree display and annotation. Bioinformatics 2007, 23, 127–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Bailey, T.L.; Boden, M.; Buske, F.A.; Frith, M.; Grant, C.E.; Clementi, L.; Ren, J.; Li, W.W.; Noble, W.S. MEME SUITE: Tools for motif discovery and searching. Nucleic Acids Res. 2009, 37, W202–W208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Wang, Y.; Tang, H.; Debarry, J.D.; Tan, X.; Li, J.; Wang, X.; Lee, T.H.; Jin, H.; Marler, B.; Guo, H.; et al. MCScanX: A toolkit for detection and evolutionary analysis of gene synteny and collinearity. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012, 40, e49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Kim, D.; Langmead, B.; Salzberg, S.L. HISAT: A fast spliced aligner with low memory requirements. Nat. Methods 2015, 12, 357–360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Fan, J.; Zhang, Y.; Sun, H.; Duan, R.; Jiang, Y.; Wang, X.; Sun, Y.; Luo, Z.; Wang, P.; Guan, S.; et al. Overexpression of soybean GmDHN9 gene enhances drought resistance of transgenic Arabidopsis. GM Crops Food. 2012, 15, 118–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Murashige, T.; Skoog, F. A revised medium for rapid growth and bioassays with tobacco tissue cultures. Plant Physiol. 1962, 15, 473–497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Wei, J.; Zhang, N.; Deng, Y.; Liu, S.; Yang, L.; Wang, X.; Wen, R.; Si, H. Functional analysis of the StERF79 gene in response to drought stress in potato (Solanum tuberosum L.). BMC Plant Biol. 2025, 25, 387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Quiñones, V.; Zanlungo, S.; Holuigue, L.; Litvak, S.; Jordana, X. The cox1 initiation codon is created by RNA editing in potato mitochondria. Plant Physiol. 1995, 108, 1327–1328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Luo, Y.; Wang, K.; Zhu, L.; Zhang, N.; Si, H. StMAPKK5 positively regulates response to drought and salt stress in potato. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2025, 25, 3662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Hofgen, R.; Willmitzer, L. Storage of competent cells for Agrobacterium transformation. Nucleic Acids Res. 1988, 16, 9877. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Liu, S.; Zhu, Y.; Xie, C.; Jue, D.; Hong, Y.; Chen, M.; Hubdar, A.K.; Yang, Q. Transgenic potato plants expressing StoVe1 exhibit enhanced resistance to Verticillium dahliae. Plant Mol. Biol. Rep. 2012, 30, 1032–1039. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Wang, J.; Liang, C.; Yang, S.; Song, J.; Li, X.; Dai, X.; Wang, F.; Juntawong, N.; Tan, F.; Zhang, X.; et al. iTRAQ-based quantitative proteomic analysis of heat stress-induced mechanisms in pepper seedlings. PeerJ 2021, 9, e11509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Gong, Y.; Chen, L.; Pan, S.; Li, X.; Xu, M.; Zhang, C.; Xing, K.; Qin, S. Antifungal potential evaluation and alleviation of salt stress in tomato seedlings by a halotolerant plant growth-promoting actinomycete Streptomyces sp. KLBMP5084. Rhizosphere 2020, 16, 100262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Zhao, H.; Wang, C.; Lan, H. A bHLH transcription factor from Chenopodium glaucum confers drought tolerance to transgenic maize by positive regulation of morphological and physiological performances and stress-responsive genes’ expressions. Mol. Breed. New Strateg. Plant Improv. 2021, 41, 74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Ji, S.; Liu, Z.; Liu, B.; Wang, Y.; Wang, J. The effect of Trichoderma biofertilizer on the quality of flowering Chinese cabbage and the soil environment. Sci. Hortic. 2020, 262, 109069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Phylogenetic tree of Solanum tuberosum (‘Q9’); Solanum tuberosum (‘DM’), and Arabidopsis thaliana (At) PYL family members. The red square and blue circle represent the PYL protein of Solanum tuberosum and Arabidopsis thaliana, respectively. The phylogenetic tree was constructed using the neighborhood connection method (NJ) and repeated 1000 times.
Figure 1. Phylogenetic tree of Solanum tuberosum (‘Q9’); Solanum tuberosum (‘DM’), and Arabidopsis thaliana (At) PYL family members. The red square and blue circle represent the PYL protein of Solanum tuberosum and Arabidopsis thaliana, respectively. The phylogenetic tree was constructed using the neighborhood connection method (NJ) and repeated 1000 times.
Plants 14 02731 g001
Figure 2. The location and distribution of 63 members of the StPYL gene family on the 12 × 4 chromosomes of potato. Green represents each chromosome, and the scale on the left indicates the length of potato chromosome. Red represents the location of each gene.
Figure 2. The location and distribution of 63 members of the StPYL gene family on the 12 × 4 chromosomes of potato. Green represents each chromosome, and the scale on the left indicates the length of potato chromosome. Red represents the location of each gene.
Plants 14 02731 g002
Figure 3. Collinearity analyses of the PYL family genes and conserved motifs, structures, structural domains of StPYLs. (A) Homology analysis of PYL family genes in different species. Top: Arabidopsis thaliana (A.t); middle: Solanum tuberosum (S.t); bottom: Solanum lycopersicum (S.l). The numbers on the horizontal line represent the chromosomes of each species. Blue lines represent the collinearity of PYLs. (B) Phylogenetic tree of Solanum tuberosum (St) of PYLs. The phylogenetic tree was constructed using NJ method with MEGA 6.0. (C) Distribution of conserved motifs in PYL protein. Patterns 1–10 are represented by boxes of different colors. (D) Cis-elements in the promoter region of StPYL genes. Various color bars represent different cis-elements. (E) Gene structures of 63 PYL genes in Solanum tuberosum. Introns and coding sequences are indicated by black and yellow lines, respectively, with green representing UTRs.
Figure 3. Collinearity analyses of the PYL family genes and conserved motifs, structures, structural domains of StPYLs. (A) Homology analysis of PYL family genes in different species. Top: Arabidopsis thaliana (A.t); middle: Solanum tuberosum (S.t); bottom: Solanum lycopersicum (S.l). The numbers on the horizontal line represent the chromosomes of each species. Blue lines represent the collinearity of PYLs. (B) Phylogenetic tree of Solanum tuberosum (St) of PYLs. The phylogenetic tree was constructed using NJ method with MEGA 6.0. (C) Distribution of conserved motifs in PYL protein. Patterns 1–10 are represented by boxes of different colors. (D) Cis-elements in the promoter region of StPYL genes. Various color bars represent different cis-elements. (E) Gene structures of 63 PYL genes in Solanum tuberosum. Introns and coding sequences are indicated by black and yellow lines, respectively, with green representing UTRs.
Plants 14 02731 g003
Figure 4. Expression patterns of StPYL genes in response to drought stress (salt treatment) at 0 h, 3 h, 6 h, 12 h, 24 h, and 48 h. Colors in the heatmap represent gene transcript levels, as indicated by the key bar to the right of the figure.
Figure 4. Expression patterns of StPYL genes in response to drought stress (salt treatment) at 0 h, 3 h, 6 h, 12 h, 24 h, and 48 h. Colors in the heatmap represent gene transcript levels, as indicated by the key bar to the right of the figure.
Plants 14 02731 g004
Figure 5. Subcellular localization of StPYL9a-like protein in tobacco epidermis. Green fluorescent protein (GFP), red fluorescent protein (RFP), chlorophyll autofluorescence (Auto), bright-field, and merged images are shown.
Figure 5. Subcellular localization of StPYL9a-like protein in tobacco epidermis. Green fluorescent protein (GFP), red fluorescent protein (RFP), chlorophyll autofluorescence (Auto), bright-field, and merged images are shown.
Plants 14 02731 g005
Figure 6. The differences in growth, physiology, and gene expression between transgenic and wild type potatoes. (A) Morphological comparison chart of wild type potatoes and genetically modified potatoes. (B) Plant height. (C) Stem diameter. (D) Number of plant leaves. (E) Pro content. (F) SOD content. (G) Chlorophyll content. (H) MDA content. (I) Relative expression level of genes. Note: statistical significance was determined using a Student’s t test (* p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001), data are mean ± SD of 3 independent experiments, n = 6 hypocotyl explants for each experiment. Scale bars, 0.5 cm.
Figure 6. The differences in growth, physiology, and gene expression between transgenic and wild type potatoes. (A) Morphological comparison chart of wild type potatoes and genetically modified potatoes. (B) Plant height. (C) Stem diameter. (D) Number of plant leaves. (E) Pro content. (F) SOD content. (G) Chlorophyll content. (H) MDA content. (I) Relative expression level of genes. Note: statistical significance was determined using a Student’s t test (* p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001), data are mean ± SD of 3 independent experiments, n = 6 hypocotyl explants for each experiment. Scale bars, 0.5 cm.
Plants 14 02731 g006
Figure 7. The effects of salt stress on the growth, physiology, and gene expression of transgenic and wild type potatoes. (A) Morphological comparison chart of wild type potatoes and genetically modified potatoes under short-term salt stress. (B) Pro content. (C) SOD content. (D) Chlorophyll content. (E) Chlorophyll a and b content. (F) MDA content. (G) Relative expression level of genes. (H) Morphological comparison diagrams of potatoes and genetically modified potatoes under long-term salt stress. Note: statistical significance was analyzed with a one sided Kruskal–Wallis test with Bonferroni correction, followed by post hoc Dunn’s test (* p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01). The same lowercase letters indicate no statistical difference between groups, while different lowercase letters indicate a statistical difference between groups (p < 0.05). Data are mean ± SD of 3 independent experiments, n = 6 hypocotyl explants for each experiment. Scale bar = 5 cm.
Figure 7. The effects of salt stress on the growth, physiology, and gene expression of transgenic and wild type potatoes. (A) Morphological comparison chart of wild type potatoes and genetically modified potatoes under short-term salt stress. (B) Pro content. (C) SOD content. (D) Chlorophyll content. (E) Chlorophyll a and b content. (F) MDA content. (G) Relative expression level of genes. (H) Morphological comparison diagrams of potatoes and genetically modified potatoes under long-term salt stress. Note: statistical significance was analyzed with a one sided Kruskal–Wallis test with Bonferroni correction, followed by post hoc Dunn’s test (* p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01). The same lowercase letters indicate no statistical difference between groups, while different lowercase letters indicate a statistical difference between groups (p < 0.05). Data are mean ± SD of 3 independent experiments, n = 6 hypocotyl explants for each experiment. Scale bar = 5 cm.
Plants 14 02731 g007
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Lv, C.; Bao, Y.; Xu, M.; Deng, K.; Zhao, L.; Zhao, Y.; Zhou, Y.; Feng, Y.; Wang, F. Genome-Wide Identification of the StPYL Gene Family and Analysis of the Functional Role of StPYL9a-like in Salt Tolerance in Potato (Solanum tuberosum L.). Plants 2025, 14, 2731. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants14172731

AMA Style

Lv C, Bao Y, Xu M, Deng K, Zhao L, Zhao Y, Zhou Y, Feng Y, Wang F. Genome-Wide Identification of the StPYL Gene Family and Analysis of the Functional Role of StPYL9a-like in Salt Tolerance in Potato (Solanum tuberosum L.). Plants. 2025; 14(17):2731. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants14172731

Chicago/Turabian Style

Lv, Chunna, Yuting Bao, Minghao Xu, Ke Deng, Long Zhao, Yihan Zhao, Yifan Zhou, Yuejuan Feng, and Fang Wang. 2025. "Genome-Wide Identification of the StPYL Gene Family and Analysis of the Functional Role of StPYL9a-like in Salt Tolerance in Potato (Solanum tuberosum L.)" Plants 14, no. 17: 2731. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants14172731

APA Style

Lv, C., Bao, Y., Xu, M., Deng, K., Zhao, L., Zhao, Y., Zhou, Y., Feng, Y., & Wang, F. (2025). Genome-Wide Identification of the StPYL Gene Family and Analysis of the Functional Role of StPYL9a-like in Salt Tolerance in Potato (Solanum tuberosum L.). Plants, 14(17), 2731. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants14172731

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop