Next Article in Journal
Salinity Mediates Tamarix chinensis Litter Decomposition to Enhance Soil Enzyme Activity in Coastal Saline–Alkali Soils
Previous Article in Journal
CmDUF239-1 Improves the Salt Tolerance of Grafted Melon by Enhancing Antioxidant Capacity and Na+/K+ Homeostasis
Previous Article in Special Issue
Progressive Water Deficit Impairs Soybean Growth, Alters Metabolic Profiles, and Decreases Photosynthetic Efficiency
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

CPK2 Enhances ABA Sensitivity in Seed Germination and Root Growth by Promoting ABA-Induced ABI5 Expression and ABI5 Protein Stability

1
College of JunCao Science and Ecology, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou 350002, China
2
Shenzhen Key Laboratory of Plant Genetic Engineering and Molecular Design, Institute of Plant and Food Science, Southern University of Science and Technology (SUSTech), Shenzhen 518055, China
3
Department of Biology, School of Life Sciences, Southern University of Science and Technology (SUSTech), Shenzhen 518055, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Plants 2025, 14(17), 2671; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants14172671
Submission received: 17 July 2025 / Revised: 20 August 2025 / Accepted: 20 August 2025 / Published: 27 August 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Plant Challenges in Response to Salt and Water Stress)

Abstract

Abscisic acid (ABA) is a crucial phytohormone that functions as a master regulator of plant growth and development, as well as responses to diverse abiotic stresses, by integrating environmental cues with developmental programs. The transcription factor ABA INSENSITIVE 5 (ABI5) functions at the central hub of the ABA signaling pathway and mediates the expression of its target genes. Emerging evidence reveals extensive crosstalk between calcium-dependent protein kinases (CPKs)-mediated calcium signaling and the ABA-ABI5 cascade, enabling plants to balance growth and stress responses. However, the molecular mechanisms underlying the interactions between CPKs and ABA-ABI5 signaling are still elusive. In this study, we revealed that CPK2 enhances sensitivity to ABA during both seed germination and seedling root growth by promoting ABA-induced ABI5 expression and increasing ABA-mediated ABI5 stability. Compared to the wildtype (Col-0), the CPK2-OE line exhibited the highest sensitivity to ABA in both seed germination and root growth, while the cpk2abi5-7 double mutant showed the least sensitivity. The single mutants cpk2 and abi5-7, as well as the abi5-7CPK2-OE2 line, displayed intermediate phenotypes, suggesting that CPK2 acts upstream of ABI5. Biochemical and molecular biological studies revealed that CPK2 physically interacts with ABI5 and directly phosphorylates it at Ser42, Ser145, and Thr201. Moreover, both ABA-induced ABI5 expression and protein accumulation were significantly reduced in cpk2 mutants upon ABA treatment. Taken together, these findings provide compelling evidence that CPK2 exacerbates the ABA inhibition of seed germination and root growth by enhancing both the expression and stability of ABI5, thereby reinforcing stress adaptation during early plant development.

1. Introduction

Abscisic acid (ABA) is a central phytohormone that orchestrates a wide range of physiological and developmental processes by integrating environmental stimuli with intrinsic developmental programs, including seed dormancy, germination, early seedling development, and stomatal closure [1,2,3,4]. The influence of ABA on these processes, as well as plant responses to environmental cues, is deeply intertwined with its signaling pathways and biosynthesis dynamics [5,6,7,8].
Over the past two decades, the core ABA signaling pathway has been well documented. It involves PYR/PYL/RCAR receptors that inhibit PP2C phosphatases, leading to SnRK2 kinase activation. Once activated, SnRK2s phosphorylate and activate downstream transcription factors, particularly those belonging to the basic leucine zipper (bZIP) family, such as ABA-responsive element-binding factors (ABFs) and ABA INSENSITIVE5 (ABI5), which are essential for triggering ABA-responsive gene expression [9,10,11,12].
ABA INSENSITIVE 5 (ABI5), a bZIP transcription factor preferentially expressed in dry seeds and strongly induced by exogenous ABA, plays a critical role in ABA-mediated inhibition of seed germination and post-germinative growth in Arabidopsis [13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21]. Genetic studies have shown that abi5 loss-of-function mutants are hyposensitive to ABA, whereas plants overexpressing ABI5 display hypersensitivity [13,14,15,22]. As a transcription factor, ABI5 regulates the expression of numerous target genes involved in stress adaptation [20]. Previous studies have identified thousands of ABI5-targeted genes [23,24,25,26,27]; however, the detailed functions of these genes in ABA-regulated seed germination and root growth remain elusive.
Calcium-dependent protein kinases (CPKs) represent another critical class of regulators in ABA signaling in Arabidopsis. As calcium sensors, CPKs integrate stress-evoked Ca2+ signals into cellular responses, linking upstream Ca2+ fluctuations to downstream physiological changes [28,29]. Structurally, CPKs are Ser/Thr protein kinases characterized by an N-terminal kinase domain fused to a C-terminal calmodulin-like domain, which maintains the enzyme in an auto-inhibited state until activated by Ca2+ binding. The Arabidopsis genome encodes 34 CPKs, many of which have been implicated in ABA-mediated processes such as stomatal movement, seed germination, and drought tolerance [30]. Notably, functional redundancy is a common feature among CPK family members due to overlapping expression patterns and substrate specificities, complicating the genetic dissection of individual roles [31]. For example, CPK3, CPK4, CPK6, and CPK11 positively regulate ABA signaling by phosphorylating key bZIP transcription factors such as ABF1 and ABF4, thereby promoting the expression of stress-responsive genes [32,33,34,35]. In contrast, CPK9 and CPK12 act as negative regulators, modulating ABA sensitivity during stomatal closure and seed germination, respectively [36,37]. Other studies have shown that CPK10 enhances drought tolerance and promotes ABA/Ca2+-induced stomatal closure, while CPK21 and CPK23 influence stomatal aperture and hyperosmotic stress responses [38,39,40]. Collectively, these findings position CPKs as central integrators of calcium and ABA signaling, making them promising targets for enhancing plant resilience through biotechnological approaches [31].
CPKs and ABA-ABI5 signaling represent two pivotal regulatory systems that enable plants to balance growth and stress responses. Emerging evidence reveals extensive crosstalk between CPK-mediated calcium signaling and ABA-ABI5 cascades [31]. Despite these advances, the full substrate networks and functional interactions of many CPKs remain incompletely understood. Moreover, the presence of functional redundancy among CPK family members complicates genetic analyses and hinders the precise characterization of individual roles. In this study, we revealed that CPK2, as a novel regulator of ABA signaling, physically interacts with and phosphorylates ABI5, thereby enhancing its stability and transcriptional activity. This CPK2-ABI5 module amplifies ABA signaling and exacerbates ABA-mediated inhibition of seed germination and root growth. Our results provide new insights into the molecular mechanisms underlying ABA-regulated seed germination and root growth and highlight CPK2 as a non-redundant component in the complex CPK-ABA regulatory network.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Plant Material and Growth Conditions

The Arabidopsis thaliana Columbia (Col-0) ecotype was used as the wild-type background in this study. The T-DNA insertion mutant cpk2 (SALK_036166) was obtained from the Arabidopsis Biological Resource Center (ABRC). The double mutant cpk2abi5-7 was generated by crossing the single mutants cpk2 and abi5-7 [41]. Homozygous T-DNA insertion lines were confirmed by PCR using primers listed in Supplemental Table S1. To generate abi5-7CPK2-OE2, the abi5-7 mutant was crossed with the overexpression line CPK2-OE2. Construction of CPK2-OE2 transgenic plants is described in detail in Section 2.2.
Seeds were surface-sterilized and sown on Petri dishes containing half-strength Murashige and Skoog (1/2 MS) agar medium (0.8%, w/v). After stratification at 4 °C for 2 days, plates were transferred to a growth chamber maintained at 22 °C under long-day conditions (16 h light/8 h dark). For soil growth, 7-day-old seedlings were transplanted into nutrient-rich soil and grown in a greenhouse under the same photoperiod and temperature conditions.
Nicotiana benthamiana seeds were also grown in nutrient-rich soil under long-day conditions (16 h light/8 h dark) at 22 °C. Three-week-old plants were used for transient transformation experiments.

2.2. Generation of Transgenic Plants

To construct the CPK2 overexpression vector, the full-length coding sequence (CDS) of CPK2 (1938 bp) was amplified by PCR and cloned into the binary vector pGWB505 under the control of the CaMV 35S promoter (The primer sequences used are listed in Supplementary Table S1). The resulting construct was introduced into Agrobacterium tumefaciens strain GV3101 and transformed into wild-type Arabidopsis plants via the floral dip method [42]. Homozygous T3 transgenic lines were selected and used for further analysis.

2.3. ABA Treatments and Root Length Analysis

For gene expression and immunoblot analyses, 7-day-old Arabidopsis seedlings were transferred to 1/2 MS agar plates supplemented with either 10 μM ABA (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) or an equal volume of ethanol (mock control), and samples were collected after the indicated time points for RNA or protein extraction.
To assess root growth sensitivity to ABA, seeds of various genotypes were sown on vertical 1/2 MS agar plates containing 10 μM ABA. Seedlings were grown for 11 days before root length measurements were taken. Images were captured at defined time points for phenotypic evaluation.
For seed germination assays, seeds were sown on 1/2 MS agar medium with or without 0.5 μM ABA. After sowing, all plates were subjected to cold stratification at 4 °C in the dark for 2–3 days to synchronize germination. The plates were then transferred to a growth chamber maintained at 22 °C under long-day conditions (16-h light/8-h dark photoperiod). Germination rates were recorded at 3 days after transfer to the growth chamber.

2.4. Split-LUC Complementation Assay

For the luciferase complementation imaging assays, the full-length CDS of CPK2 was amplified by PCR and cloned into pCambia1300-nLUC to obtain CPK2-nLUC. The ABI5-cLUC was previously described [43]. Site-directed mutagenesis was performed on the ABI5-cLUC vector to generate the ABI5Ser42A-cLUC, ABI5Ser145A-cLUC, and ABI5Thr201A-cLUC mutants (The primer sequences used are listed in Supplementary Table S1). Recombinant Agrobacterium strains carrying the corresponding constructs were infiltrated into N. benthamiana leaves. After 2 days, 1 mM luciferin was sprayed onto the leaf surfaces, and plants were placed in darkness for 5–10 min. Luminescence signals were then detected using a CCD imaging system (Tanon 6100C, Shanghai, China).

2.5. Co-Immunoprecipitation Assay (Co-IP)

To investigate the in vivo interaction between CPK2 and ABI5, the coding sequence (CDS) of ABI5 was cloned into the pGWB405 vector to generate the construct 35S:ABI5-GFP, while the CDS of CPK2 was cloned into the pGWB414 vector to produce 35S:CPK2-HA. These constructs were then introduced into Agrobacterium tumefaciens strain GV3101 for transient expression in N. benthamiana.
For the Co-IP assay, leaves from three-week-old N. benthamiana plants were infiltrated with Agrobacterium cultures carrying the appropriate vector combinations. Two days post-infiltration, leaf tissues were harvested, flash-frozen in liquid nitrogen, and ground into fine powder. Protein extraction was carried out using IP buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 150 mM NaCl, 0.5 mM EDTA, 0.5% Triton X-100, supplemented with protease inhibitor cocktail). Samples were incubated on ice for 1 h, followed by centrifugation at 12,000× g for 10 min at 4 °C. The supernatant was collected and incubated with anti-GFP monoclonal antibody-conjugated magnetic beads (MBL, Beijing, China) overnight at 4 °C with gentle rotation. The immunoprecipitated complexes were washed three times with washing buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 150 mM NaCl, 0.5 mM EDTA, 0.5% Triton X-100). Both the immunoprecipitated proteins and input extracts were subjected to immunoblot analysis. GFP-tagged ABI5 and HA-tagged CPK2 were detected using anti-GFP (MBL, Beijing, China) and anti-HA (Roche, Basel, Switzerland) antibodies, respectively, each used at a dilution of 1:5000.

2.6. Protein Expression and Purification

Recombinant protein plasmids were transformed into Escherichia coli BL21 (DE3) cells. A single colony from each transformation was selected and first cultured in 5 mL of LB liquid medium containing the appropriate antibiotics at 37 °C for 12 h. This pre-culture was then transferred to 100 mL of fresh LB medium with corresponding antibiotics and incubated at 37 °C for 2–4 h until the OD600 reached approximately 0.6.
Unless otherwise specified, recombinant protein expression was induced by adding 0.1 mM isopropyl-β-D-thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG), followed by incubation at 16 °C for 12–16 h. GST-tagged proteins were purified using GST Mag-Beads (BBI, Shanghai, China, catalog no. C650031), and His-tagged proteins were purified using His Mag-Beads (BBI, Shanghai, China, catalog no. C650033), according to the manufacturer’s instructions.

2.7. Pull-Down Assay

For the GST pull-down assay, CPK2 fragments were cloned into the pMAL vector to generate MBP-His-CPK2 fusion proteins. ABI5-GST was previously described [43]. In brief, 2 μg of MBP-CPK2-His protein was incubated with 1.5 μg of ABI5-GST protein and subsequently immunoprecipitated using GST beads at 4 °C for 1 h. The beads were collected using a magnetic stand, washed four times with PBS buffer, and eluted with 10 mM reduced glutathione. The eluted proteins were separated by SDS-PAGE and analyzed by immunoblotting using anti-His (MBL, Beijing, China) and anti-GST (Beyotime Biotechnology, Shanghai, China) antibodies.

2.8. In Vitro Phosphorylation Assay

For the in vitro phosphorylation assay, the coding sequences (CDSs) of ABI5S42A, ABI5S145A, and ABI5T201A were amplified and cloned into the pGEX6p-2 vector to generate ABI5S42A-GST, ABI5S145A-GST, and ABI5T201A-GST, respectively. The CDS of CPK2 was cloned into the pMAL-MBP-His vector to produce MBP-CPK2-His.
In brief, 1.5 μg of MBP-CPK2-His protein was incubated separately with 1.5 μg of ABI5-GST, ABI5S42A-GST, ABI5S145A-GST, or ABI5T201A-GST in phosphorylation buffer (20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5; 5 mM MgCl2; 1 mM DTT; 1 mM CaCl2; 50 μM ATP; protease inhibitor cocktail; protein phosphatase inhibitors) at 30 °C for 30 min. The reaction was terminated by the addition of SDS loading buffer, followed by heating at 100 °C for 5 min. Reaction products were separated by SDS-PAGE and analyzed via immunoblotting using an anti-phosphoserine/threonine antibody (PhosphoSolutions, Aurora, CO, USA) at a dilution of 1:1000.

2.9. RNA Isolation and RT-qPCR Analysis

Total RNA was extracted from plant tissues using the ReliaPrep™ RNA Miniprep System (Promega, Madison, WI, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. For RT-qPCR analysis, first-strand cDNA was synthesized from 1 μg of total RNA using the NovoScript® Plus All-in-one 1st Strand cDNA Synthesis SuperMix (Novoprotein, Suzhou, China). Quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR) was carried out on an Applied Biosystems 7500 Real-Time PCR System using SYBR Green Master Mix (YEASEN, Shanghai, China), following the manufacturer’s recommended protocol. The Arabidopsis Actin2 gene was used as an internal reference for normalization. Gene-specific primer sequences used in this study are listed in Supplemental Table S1 or were derived from previous studies [43].

2.10. Quantification and Statistical Analysis

Data for quantification analyses are presented as mean ± standard error (SE) or standard deviation (SD). Statistical significance among treatments was examined by Student’s t-test, two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) test (Tukey’s multiple comparisons test).

3. Results

3.1. CPK2 Enhances the Sensitivity of Root Growth to ABA

To investigate the role of CPK2 in ABA signaling during early seedling development, we obtained a T-DNA insertion mutant, cpk2 (SALK_036166), and generated CPK2-overexpressing lines under the control of the CaMV 35S promoter. Two independent CPK2-overexpressing lines, CPK2-OE2 and CPK2-OE6, were selected based on RT-qPCR analysis (Supplementary Figure S1). Seeds of wild type (Col-0), cpk2, and the two CPK2-overexpressing lines, CPK2-OE2 and CPK2-OE6, were sown on 1/2 MS medium supplemented with 10 μM ABA. No significant differences in root growth were observed among genotypes on ABA-free medium. However, in the presence of ABA, the cpk2 mutant exhibited reduced sensitivity to ABA, whereas the CPK2-overexpressing lines showed enhanced sensitivity compared to the wild type (Figure 1A,B).

3.2. CPK2 Physically Interacts with ABI5

As a central transcription factor in the ABA signaling pathway, ABI5 plays a crucial role in regulating ABA-responsive gene expression during seed dormancy, germination, and seedling growth [15]. To investigate whether CPK2 is involved in ABA signaling through interaction with ABI5, we first performed a luciferase complementation imaging (LCI) assay. CPK2 was fused to the N-terminal half of luciferase (nLUC), and ABI5 was fused to the C-terminal half (cLUC). The constructs were co-expressed in N. benthamiana leaves. A strong luminescent signal (LUC activity) was observed upon co-expression of CPK2 and ABI5, whereas no signal was detected in the negative controls, indicating that CPK2 interacts with ABI5 in planta (Figure 2A). To determine whether this interaction is direct, we conducted an in vitro GST pull-down assay. Recombinant GST-ABI5, but not GST alone, efficiently pulled down His-CPK2, confirming a direct physical interaction between the two proteins (Figure 2B). To further validate this interaction in vivo, we conducted co-immunoprecipitation (Co-IP) experiments. CPK2-HA and ABI5-GFP were co-expressed in N. benthamiana leaves, and GFP-tagged proteins were immunoprecipitated using GFP-Trap beads. Immunoblotting with anti-HA and anti-GFP antibodies showed that CPK2-HA was specifically co-precipitated with ABI5-GFP, but not with free GFP (Figure 2C).

3.3. CPK2 Phosphorylates ABI5

Calcium-dependent protein kinases (CPKs) are known to phosphorylate downstream substrates at serine or threonine residues, thereby regulating various aspects of plant growth and stress responses [28]. To determine whether CPK2 can phosphorylate ABI5, we performed in vitro phosphorylation assays using purified recombinant proteins. These assays confirmed that CPK2 directly phosphorylates ABI5 (Figure 3A). Previous studies have shown that the Ser42, Ser145, and Thr201 residues of ABI5 are phosphorylated both in vivo and in vitro [19,22,44]. To investigate whether these residues serve as phosphorylation targets of CPK2, we generated site-directed mutants in which Ser42, Ser145, and Thr201 were individually mutated to alanine (Ala), mimicking a non-phosphorylation state. When tested in in vitro phosphorylation assays, each mutant showed significantly reduced phosphorylation by CPK2 compared to wild-type ABI5 (Figure 3A,B), indicating that these residues contribute to CPK2-mediated phosphorylation. Notably, luciferase complementation imaging (LCI) assays showed reduced interaction between CPK2 and ABI5 in these mutants. Specifically, when ABI5Ser42-cLUC, ABI5Ser145-cLUC, or ABI5Thr201-cLUC was co-expressed with CPK2-nLUC in N. benthamiana leaves, LUC activity was markedly decreased compared to wild-type ABI5 (Figure 3C).

3.4. CPK2 Enhances ABA-Induced ABI5 Expression and Stability

To explore the molecular mechanism by which CPK2 regulates ABA signaling during seedling growth, we investigated whether CPK2 modulates the expression and accumulation of ABI5. Seven-day-old seedlings of Col-0 and cpk2 mutants were transferred to 1/2 MS medium supplemented with or without 10 μM ABA for 3 h, followed by qRT-PCR analysis. Under control conditions, ABI5 transcript levels were comparable between Col-0 and cpk2. ABA treatment strongly induced ABI5 expression in both genotypes, but this induction was significantly attenuated in the cpk2 mutant compared to Col-0 (Figure 4A). We further analyzed the influences of ABA on ABI5 accumulation under Col-0 and cpk2 mutant backgrounds. Col-0 and cpk2 mutant seedlings were treated with 10 μM ABA for 0, 30, and 60 min, and the samples were harvested at the indicated time for the western blot assay. The results indicated that ABI5 protein levels increased after ABA treatment in Col-0 seedlings, whereas ABA treatment significantly reduced the ABI5 accumulation in the cpk2 mutant (Figure 4B).

3.5. Genetic Relationship Between CPK2 and ABI5

Given that ABI5 is a known positive regulator of ABA signaling, we sought to determine whether CPK2 acts synergistically with ABI5 in modulating ABA responses. To investigate the genetic relationship between CPK2 and ABI5, we generated double mutants by crossing abi5-7 with either the cpk2 mutant or the CPK2-overexpressing line, CPK2-OE2, resulting in cpk2abi5-7 and abi5-7CPK2-OE2, respectively. Seeds of these genotypes, as well as the wildtype Col-0, were sown on the 1/2 MS medium supplemented with or without 10 μM ABA, and root lengths were measured after 10 days of treatment. No significant differences in root length were observed among the genotypes on the ABA-free medium. ABA treatment inhibited root growth in all genotypes, but to varying degrees. The CPK2-OE2 line exhibited the greatest sensitivity (strongest inhibition), whereas the cpk2abi5-7 double mutant showed the least sensitivity (weakest inhibition). Notably, the cpk2, abi5-7, and abi5-7CPK2-OE2 lines all displayed reduced ABA sensitivity compared to Col-0 (Figure 5A,B). To assess whether this ABA response phenotype extends to seed germination, seeds of Col-0, cpk2, abi5-7, CPK2-OE2, cpk2abi5-7, and abi5-7CPK2-OE2 were sown on 1/2 MS medium supplemented with or without 0.5 μM ABA. Germination rates were recorded after 3 days of stratification. Under control conditions, all genotypes exhibited complete germination with no significant differences. In the presence of ABA, the cpk2 mutant displayed reduced ABA sensitivity compared to Col-0 but was more sensitive than abi5-7 (higher germination rate than Col-0 and lower than abi5-7). In contrast, CPK2-OE2 seeds showed enhanced ABA sensitivity (lower germination rate than Col-0). The cpk2abi5-7 double mutant exhibited less sensitivity to ABA than either cpk2 or abi5-7 single mutants, and the abi5-7CPK2-OE2 line was less sensitive than both Col-0 and CPK2-OE2 (higher germination rate than either genotype) (Figure 5C,D).

4. Discussion

Abscisic acid (ABA) plays critical roles in regulating plant growth and development under both normal conditions and adverse environmental stresses, including drought, high salinity, and cold. Upon exposure to these adverse conditions, ABA level rises rapidly, functioning as a central hormonal signal that initiates a broad spectrum of adaptive physiological responses [12,45,46,47]. Among the most critical developmental processes regulated by ABA are seed germination and root growth, which are vital for nutrient and water uptake and for environmental adaptation [48].
ABI5 (ABA INSENSITIVE 5), a key transcription factor in the ABA signaling cascade, orchestrates plant responses throughout the life cycle and in response to environmental cues. As a central regulatory hub, ABI5 integrates ABA signals with developmental programs and other phytohormone pathways, fine-tuning stress adaptation by regulating the expression of numerous downstream genes. The activity of ABI5 is tightly controlled through multiple regulatory layers, including transcriptional induction, protein stability, subcellular localization, and post-translational modifications (PTMs), ensuring precise responsiveness to dynamic ABA signals [49,50,51,52,53]. Among PTMs, phosphorylation is a major mechanism modulating ABI5 function. Several kinases have been shown to phosphorylate ABI5 at distinct residues, leading to divergent functional outcomes [17]. For instance, SnRK2s, core components of the ABA signaling pathway, phosphorylate ABI5 at Ser42, Ser145, and Thr201, promoting its stability and transcriptional activity under stress [19,22,44]. Phosphorylation at these sites can create docking motifs for downstream effectors or prevent recognition by E3 ubiquitin ligases such as KEG and COP1, thereby delaying proteasomal degradation [50,54]. Conversely, MPK3-mediated phosphorylation promotes ABI5 inactivation [55]. This complex phosphorylation network allows fine-tuned control of ABI5 abundance and activity in response to internal and external stimuli. Despite this progress, the role of calcium-dependent signaling in modulating ABI5 remains incompletely defined, particularly in the context of cross-talk between Ca2+ and ABA pathways.
Calcium-dependent protein kinases (CPKs/CDPKs) are key mediators that translate calcium transients into phosphorylation events during stress responses. In Arabidopsis thaliana, the CPK family comprises 34 members that exhibit diverse roles in growth, development, and stress adaptation, among which CPK2 has been identified as an ER-localized kinase [30,56]. Multiple CPKs—including CPK3, CPK4, CPK6, CPK9, CPK10, CPK11, and CPK32, are involved in ABA signaling [32,33,35,36,38,57]. Functional redundancy among CPKs suggests a robust and layered regulatory network that ensures signaling fidelity under fluctuating conditions. Beyond Arabidopsis, emerging evidence supports the evolutionary conservation of CPK functions in ABA signaling, such as BnaCPK5 in Brassica napus and MdCPK4 in Malus domestica, which also function in ABA signaling through phosphorylation of key regulators (ABFs and PYLs) [58,59]. Such functional redundancy implies that CPK2 may share overlapping roles with other CPKs in certain aspects of ABA signaling, thereby enhancing the robustness and precision of the plant’s response to stress.
In this study, we provide compelling evidence that cpk2 mutants exhibit ABA-insensitive phenotypes, whereas CPK2-overexpressing lines display heightened ABA sensitivity during seed germination and root growth (Figure 1 and Figure 5), establishing CPK2 as a positive regulator of ABA signaling. Through comprehensive genetic, biochemical, and molecular analyses, we reveal that CPK2 increases the sensitivity of seed germination and root growth to ABA by promoting ABA-mediated ABI5 expression (Figure 1 and Figure 4A). Furthermore, CPK2 also enhanced the ABA-mediated ABI5 stability by directly interacting with ABI5 and phosphorylating it at S42, S145, and T201 (Figure 2, Figure 3 and Figure 4B). Our findings suggest that CPK2 may act in parallel or cooperatively with SnRK2s to reinforce ABI5 activation under calcium-elevating stress conditions, such as drought or high salinity, where Ca2+ serves as a secondary messenger. From an applied perspective, the CPK2–ABI5 module offers a promising target for improving abiotic stress tolerance in crops. Unlike constitutive overexpression of ABI5, which often leads to severe growth penalties, modulating CPK2 activity or engineering phosphorylation-mimic variants of ABI5 could enable inducible stress responses with minimal fitness cost.
Nonetheless, several limitations warrant further investigation. First, while our in vitro kinase assays demonstrate that CPK2 can phosphorylate ABI5 at S42, S145, and T201, the physiological relevance of these phosphorylation events in vivo requires further validation. The kinase activity and substrate specificity observed in vitro may not fully recapitulate the dynamic and context-dependent regulation occurring in living cells. Second, many of our protein–protein interaction studies were performed in the N. benthamiana transient expression system. Although widely used and informative, this heterologous system may not fully recapitulate the native interaction landscape in Arabidopsis, due to differences in post-translational modifications, subcellular environments, or the absence of endogenous regulatory factors.
In summary, our results provide evidence that CPK2, as a positive regulator in the ABA signaling pathway, is involved in the regulation of seed germination and root growth by enhancing both the expression and stability of ABI5 in Arabidopsis (Figure 6). Together, these findings expand our understanding of the molecular mechanisms linking calcium signaling to ABA responses and highlight the importance of kinase-mediated regulation of key transcription factors in stress adaptation.

5. Conclusions

In conclusion, this study elucidates a critical role for CPK2 in modulating ABA signaling during seed germination and root growth by directly targeting the key transcription factor ABI5. This CPK2-ABI5 module represents a critical regulatory node in ABA signaling. These findings provide a potential target for improving abiotic stress tolerance in crops through biotechnological approaches. Further validation in crop species will be essential to translate these findings into agricultural applications.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/plants14172671/s1: Figure S1: Molecular characterization of the cpk2 mutant and transgenic lines. (A) Schematic diagram showing the T-DNA insertion site in the cpk2 mutant. (B) Quantitative RT-PCR analysis of CPK2 gene expression in wild-type (Col-0), cpk2 mutant, CPK2-overexpressing line (CPK2-OE2, CPK2-OE6) and abi5-7CPK2-OE2. (C) Quantitative RT-PCR analysis of ABI5 gene expression in wild-type (Col-0), abi5-7 mutant, cpk2abi5-7, and abi5-7CPK2-OE2; Figure S2: Schematic diagrams of the constructs used in this study. (A) pGWB505-CPK2-EGFP: A plant overexpression vector in which the CPK2 coding sequence is fused in-frame to the N-terminus of EGFP under the control of the CaMV 35S promoter. (B) pMAL-MBP-CPK2-His: A bacterial expression vector for production of recombinant CPK2 protein. (C,D) pGWB414-CPK2-HA and pGWB405-ABI5-EGFP: Used for Co-IP assays. (E) pCambia1300-CPK2-nLUC: Used in LCI assays; Table S1: Primers used in this study.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, X.L. and J.L.; methodology, X.L.; investigation, X.L.; formal analysis, X.L., W.Z., W.X., and J.L.; writing—original draft preparation, X.L. and J.L.; writing—reviewing and editing, X.L., W.X., and J.L.; supervision, J.L.; project administration, J.L.; funding acquisition, J.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the Shenzhen Science and Technology Program (grant no.: ZDSYS20230626091659010 and JCYJ20220818100216036 to J.L.); Guangdong Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation (no. 2025A1515010908 to W.Z.) and Shenzhen Innovation Committee of Science and Technology (no. JCYJ20240813094559030 to J.L.). The authors acknowledge the assistance of SUSTech Core Research Facilities and SUSTech IPF Core Facilities.

Data Availability Statement

All data and materials that support the findings of this study are included in the manuscript or in the Supplementary Materials.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Guo, Y.; Ren, G.; Zhang, K.; Li, Z.; Miao, Y.; Guo, H. Leaf senescence: Progression, regulation, and application. Mol. Hortic. 2021, 1, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Martignago, D.; Siemiatkowska, B.; Lombardi, A.; Conti, L. Abscisic Acid and Flowering Regulation: Many Targets, Different Places. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 9700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Munemasa, S.; Hauser, F.; Park, J.; Waadt, R.; Brandt, B.; Schroeder, J.I. Mechanisms of abscisic acid-mediated control of stomatal aperture. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2015, 28, 154–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Finkelstein, R.R.; Gampala, S.S.L.; Rock, C.D. Abscisic Acid Signaling in Seeds and Seedlings. Plant Cell 2002, 14, S15–S45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Muhammad Aslam, M.; Waseem, M.; Jakada, B.H.; Okal, E.J.; Lei, Z.; Saqib, H.S.; Yuan, W.; Xu, W.; Zhang, Q. Mechanisms of Abscisic Acid-Mediated Drought Stress Responses in Plants. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 1084. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Lamers, J.; Zhang, Y.; van Zelm, E.; Leong, C.K.; Meyer, A.J.; de Zeeuw, T.; Verstappen, F.; Veen, M.; Deolu-Ajayi, A.O.; Gommers, C.M.M.; et al. Abscisic acid signaling gates salt-induced responses of plant roots. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2025, 122, e2406373122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Singh, A.; Roychoudhury, A. Abscisic acid in plants under abiotic stress: Crosstalk with major phytohormones. Plant Cell Rep. 2023, 42, 961–974. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Zhang, H.; Zhu, J.; Gong, Z.; Zhu, J.K. Abiotic stress responses in plants. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2022, 23, 104–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Fujii, H.; Verslues, P.E.; Zhu, J.-K. Identification of Two Protein Kinases Required for Abscisic Acid Regulation of Seed Germination, Root Growth, and Gene Expression in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 2007, 19, 485–494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Mustilli, A.-C.; Merlot, S.; Vavasseur, A.; Fenzi, F.; Giraudat, J. Arabidopsis OST1 Protein Kinase Mediates the Regulation of Stomatal Aperture by Abscisic Acid and Acts Upstream of Reactive Oxygen Species Production. Plant Cell 2002, 14, 3089–3099. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Fujita, Y.; Nakashima, K.; Yoshida, T.; Katagiri, T.; Kidokoro, S.; Kanamori, N.; Umezawa, T.; Fujita, M.; Maruyama, K.; Ishiyama, K.; et al. Three SnRK2 protein kinases are the main positive regulators of abscisic acid signaling in response to water stress in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell Physiol. 2009, 50, 2123–2132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Chen, K.; Li, G.J.; Bressan, R.A.; Song, C.P.; Zhu, J.K.; Zhao, Y. Abscisic acid dynamics, signaling, and functions in plants. J. Integr. Plant Biol. 2020, 62, 25–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Finkelstein, R.R. Mutations at two new Arabidopsis ABA response loci are similar to the abi3 mutations. Plant J. Cell Mol. Biol. 1994, 5, 765–771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Lopez-Molina, L.; Chua, N.H. A null mutation in a bZIP factor confers ABA-insensitivity in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Cell Physiol. 2000, 41, 541–547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Finkelstein, R.R.; Lynch, T.J. The Arabidopsis Abscisic Acid Response Gene ABI5 Encodes a Basic Leucine Zipper Transcription Factor. Plant Cell 2000, 12, 599–609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Lopez-Molina, L.; Mongrand, S.; Chua, N.H. A postgermination developmental arrest checkpoint is mediated by abscisic acid and requires the ABI5 transcription factor in Arabidopsis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2001, 98, 4782–4787. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Lopez-Molina, L.; Mongrand, S.; McLachlin, D.T.; Chait, B.T.; Chua, N.H. ABI5 acts downstream of ABI3 to execute an ABA-dependent growth arrest during germination. Plant J. Cell Mol. Biol. 2002, 32, 317–328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Brocard, I.M.; Lynch, T.J.; Finkelstein, R.R. Regulation and role of the Arabidopsis abscisic acid-insensitive 5 gene in abscisic acid, sugar, and stress response. Plant Physiol. 2002, 129, 1533–1543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Yu, F.; Wu, Y.; Xie, Q. Precise protein post-translational modifications modulate ABI5 activity. Trends Plant Sci. 2015, 20, 569–575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Skubacz, A.; Daszkowska-Golec, A.; Szarejko, I. The Role and Regulation of ABI5 (ABA-Insensitive 5) in Plant Development, Abiotic Stress Responses and Phytohormone Crosstalk. Front. Plant Sci. 2016, 7, 1884. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Finkelstein, R.; Gampala, S.S.; Lynch, T.J.; Thomas, T.L.; Rock, C.D. Redundant and distinct functions of the ABA response loci ABA-INSENSITIVE(ABI)5 and ABRE-BINDING FACTOR (ABF)3. Plant Mol. Biol. 2005, 59, 253–267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Zhou, X.; Hao, H.; Zhang, Y.; Bai, Y.; Zhu, W.; Qin, Y.; Yuan, F.; Zhao, F.; Wang, M.; Hu, J.; et al. SOS2-LIKE PROTEIN KINASE5, an SNF1-RELATED PROTEIN KINASE3-Type Protein Kinase, Is Important for Abscisic Acid Responses in Arabidopsis through Phosphorylation of ABSCISIC ACID-INSENSITIVE5. Plant Physiol. 2015, 168, 659–676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Nakabayashi, K.; Okamoto, M.; Koshiba, T.; Kamiya, Y.; Nambara, E. Genome-wide profiling of stored mRNA in Arabidopsis thaliana seed germination: Epigenetic and genetic regulation of transcription in seed. Plant J. Cell Mol. Biol. 2005, 41, 697–709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Nakashima, K.; Fujita, Y.; Kanamori, N.; Katagiri, T.; Umezawa, T.; Kidokoro, S.; Maruyama, K.; Yoshida, T.; Ishiyama, K.; Kobayashi, M.; et al. Three Arabidopsis SnRK2 protein kinases, SRK2D/SnRK2.2, SRK2E/SnRK2.6/OST1 and SRK2I/SnRK2.3, involved in ABA signaling are essential for the control of seed development and dormancy. Plant Cell Physiol. 2009, 50, 1345–1363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. O'Malley, R.C.; Huang, S.C.; Song, L.; Lewsey, M.G.; Bartlett, A.; Nery, J.R.; Galli, M.; Gallavotti, A.; Ecker, J.R. Cistrome and Epicistrome Features Shape the Regulatory DNA Landscape. Cell 2016, 165, 1280–1292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Lee, S.C.; Luan, S. ABA signal transduction at the crossroad of biotic and abiotic stress responses. Plant Cell Environ. 2012, 35, 53–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Reeves, W.M.; Lynch, T.J.; Mobin, R.; Finkelstein, R.R. Direct targets of the transcription factors ABA-Insensitive(ABI)4 and ABI5 reveal synergistic action by ABI4 and several bZIP ABA response factors. Plant Mol. Biol. 2011, 75, 347–363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Dekomah, S.D.; Bi, Z.; Dormatey, R.; Wang, Y.; Haider, F.U.; Sun, C.; Yao, P.; Bai, J. The role of CDPKs in plant development, nutrient and stress signaling. Front. Genet. 2022, 13, 996203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Yip Delormel, T.; Boudsocq, M. Properties and functions of calcium-dependent protein kinases and their relatives in Arabidopsis thaliana. New Phytol. 2019, 224, 585–604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Kudla, J.; Becker, D.; Grill, E.; Hedrich, R.; Hippler, M.; Kummer, U.; Parniske, M.; Romeis, T.; Schumacher, K. Advances and current challenges in calcium signaling. New Phytol. 2018, 218, 414–431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Edel, K.H.; Kudla, J. Integration of calcium and ABA signaling. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2016, 33, 83–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Zhang, H.; Liu, D.; Yang, B.; Liu, W.Z.; Mu, B.; Song, H.; Chen, B.; Li, Y.; Ren, D.; Deng, H.; et al. Arabidopsis CPK6 positively regulates ABA signaling and drought tolerance through phosphorylating ABA-responsive element-binding factors. J. Exp. Bot. 2020, 71, 188–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Zhu, S.Y.; Yu, X.C.; Wang, X.J.; Zhao, R.; Li, Y.; Fan, R.C.; Shang, Y.; Du, S.Y.; Wang, X.F.; Wu, F.Q.; et al. Two calcium-dependent protein kinases, CPK4 and CPK11, regulate abscisic acid signal transduction in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 2007, 19, 3019–3036. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Prodhan, M.Y.; Munemasa, S.; Nahar, M.N.; Nakamura, Y.; Murata, Y. Guard Cell Salicylic Acid Signaling Is Integrated into Abscisic Acid Signaling via the Ca2+/CPK-Dependent Pathway. Plant Physiol. 2018, 178, 441–450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Mori, I.C.; Murata, Y.; Yang, Y.; Munemasa, S.; Wang, Y.F.; Andreoli, S.; Tiriac, H.; Alonso, J.M.; Harper, J.F.; Ecker, J.R.; et al. CDPKs CPK6 and CPK3 function in ABA regulation of guard cell S-type anion- and Ca2+-permeable channels and stomatal closure. PLoS Biol. 2006, 4, e327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Chen, D.-H.; Liu, H.-P.; Li, C.-L. Calcium-dependent protein kinase CPK9 negatively functions in stomatal abscisic acid signaling by regulating ion channel activity in Arabidopsis. Plant Mol. Biol. 2019, 99, 113–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Zhao, R.; Sun, H.L.; Mei, C.; Wang, X.J.; Yan, L.; Liu, R.; Zhang, X.F.; Wang, X.F.; Zhang, D.P. The Arabidopsis Ca2+-dependent protein kinase CPK12 negatively regulates abscisic acid signaling in seed germination and post-germination growth. New Phytol. 2011, 192, 61–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Zou, J.J.; Wei, F.J.; Wang, C.; Wu, J.J.; Ratnasekera, D.; Liu, W.X.; Wu, W.H. Arabidopsis calcium-dependent protein kinase CPK10 functions in abscisic acid- and Ca2+-mediated stomatal regulation in response to drought stress. Plant Physiol. 2010, 154, 1232–1243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Ma, S.-Y.; Wu, W.-H. AtCPK23 functions in Arabidopsis responses to drought and salt stresses. Plant Mol. Biol. 2007, 65, 511–518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Franz, S.; Ehlert, B.; Liese, A.; Kurth, J.; Cazalé, A.C.; Romeis, T. Calcium-dependent protein kinase CPK21 functions in abiotic stress response in Arabidopsis thaliana. Mol. Plant 2011, 4, 83–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Zhao, H.; Nie, K.; Zhou, H.; Yan, X.; Zhan, Q.; Zheng, Y.; Song, C.P. ABI5 modulates seed germination via feedback regulation of the expression of the PYR/PYL/RCAR ABA receptor genes. New Phytol. 2020, 228, 596–608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Clough, S.J.; Bent, A.F. Floral dip: A simplified method for Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J. Cell Mol. Biol. 1998, 16, 735–743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Li, Z.; Zhang, D.; Liang, X.; Liang, J. Receptor for Activated C Kinase 1 counteracts ABSCISIC ACID INSENSITIVE5-mediated inhibition of seed germination and post-germinative growth in Arabidopsis. J. Exp. Bot. 2024, 75, 3932–3945. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Wang, Y.; Li, L.; Ye, T.; Lu, Y.; Chen, X.; Wu, Y. The inhibitory effect of ABA on floral transition is mediated by ABI5 in Arabidopsis. J. Exp. Bot. 2013, 64, 675–684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Nakashima, K.; Yamaguchi-Shinozaki, K. ABA signaling in stress-response and seed development. Plant Cell Rep. 2013, 32, 959–970. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Yoshida, T.; Christmann, A.; Yamaguchi-Shinozaki, K.; Grill, E.; Fernie, A.R. Revisiting the Basal Role of ABA-Roles Outside of Stress. Trends Plant Sci. 2019, 24, 625–635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Dong, T.; Park, Y.; Hwang, I. Abscisic acid: Biosynthesis, inactivation, homoeostasis and signalling. Essays Biochem. 2015, 58, 29–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Nonogaki, H. Seed Biology Updates-Highlights and New Discoveries in Seed Dormancy and Germination Research. Front. Plant Sci. 2017, 8, 524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Yang, M.; Han, X.; Yang, J.; Jiang, Y.; Hu, Y. The Arabidopsis circadian clock protein PRR5 interacts with and stimulates ABI5 to modulate abscisic acid signaling during seed germination. Plant Cell 2021, 33, 3022–3041. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Peng, J.; Wang, M.; Wang, X.; Qi, L.; Guo, C.; Li, H.; Li, C.; Yan, Y.; Zhou, Y.; Terzaghi, W.; et al. COP1 positively regulates ABA signaling during Arabidopsis seedling growth in darkness by mediating ABA-induced ABI5 accumulation. Plant Cell 2022, 34, 2286–2308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Miura, K.; Lee, J.; Jin, J.B.; Yoo, C.Y.; Miura, T.; Hasegawa, P.M. Sumoylation of ABI5 by the Arabidopsis SUMO E3 ligase SIZ1 negatively regulates abscisic acid signaling. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2009, 106, 5418–5423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Albertos, P.; Romero-Puertas, M.C.; Tatematsu, K.; Mateos, I.; Sánchez-Vicente, I.; Nambara, E.; Lorenzo, O. S-nitrosylation triggers ABI5 degradation to promote seed germination and seedling growth. Nat. Commun. 2015, 6, 8669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Dai, M.; Xue, Q.; McCray, T.; Margavage, K.; Chen, F.; Lee, J.H.; Nezames, C.D.; Guo, L.; Terzaghi, W.; Wan, J.; et al. The PP6 phosphatase regulates ABI5 phosphorylation and abscisic acid signaling in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 2013, 25, 517–534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Stone, S.L.; Williams, L.A.; Farmer, L.M.; Vierstra, R.D.; Callis, J. KEEP ON GOING, a RING E3 Ligase Essential for Arabidopsis Growth and Development, Is Involved in Abscisic Acid Signaling. Plant Cell 2006, 18, 3415–3428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Bhagat, P.K.; Verma, N.; Pandey, S.; Verma, D.; Sinha, A.K. MPK3 mediated phosphorylation inhibits the dimerization of ABI5 to fine-tune the ABA signaling in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2025, 221, 109690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Lu, S.X.; Hrabak, E.M. An Arabidopsis calcium-dependent protein kinase is associated with the endoplasmic reticulum. Plant Physiol. 2002, 128, 1008–1021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Choi, H.I.; Park, H.J.; Park, J.H.; Kim, S.; Im, M.Y.; Seo, H.H.; Kim, Y.W.; Hwang, I.; Kim, S.Y. Arabidopsis calcium-dependent protein kinase AtCPK32 interacts with ABF4, a transcriptional regulator of abscisic acid-responsive gene expression, and modulates its activity. Plant Physiol. 2005, 139, 1750–1761. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Cheng, H.; Pan, G.; Zhou, N.; Zhai, Z.; Yang, L.; Zhu, H.; Cui, X.; Zhao, P.; Zhang, H.; Li, S.; et al. Calcium-dependent Protein Kinase 5 (CPK5) positively modulates drought tolerance through phosphorylating ABA-Responsive Element Binding Factors in oilseed rape (Brassica napus L.). Plant Sci. 2022, 315, 111125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Liu, Y.; Zhang, Q.; Chen, D.; Shi, W.; Gao, X.; Liu, Y.; Hu, B.; Wang, A.; Li, X.; An, X.; et al. Positive regulation of ABA signaling by MdCPK4 interacting with and phosphorylating MdPYL2/12 in Arabidopsis. J. Plant Physiol. 2024, 293, 154165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. CPK2 enhances the sensitivity of root growth to ABA. (A) Root phenotypes of WT, cpk2 mutants, and two overexpression lines on normal medium or medium supplemented with 10 μM ABA. (B) Primary root length was measured at 10 d after germination. Data are presented as means ± SD (n = 20). Statistics were performed using two-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s multiple comparisons test within the same treatment. Different lowercase letters (a, b, c, d) indicate significant differences among genotypes (p < 0.05). Dots and squares represent individual root length measurements, with symbol type used to distinguish experimental conditions. Scale bars, 1 cm.
Figure 1. CPK2 enhances the sensitivity of root growth to ABA. (A) Root phenotypes of WT, cpk2 mutants, and two overexpression lines on normal medium or medium supplemented with 10 μM ABA. (B) Primary root length was measured at 10 d after germination. Data are presented as means ± SD (n = 20). Statistics were performed using two-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s multiple comparisons test within the same treatment. Different lowercase letters (a, b, c, d) indicate significant differences among genotypes (p < 0.05). Dots and squares represent individual root length measurements, with symbol type used to distinguish experimental conditions. Scale bars, 1 cm.
Plants 14 02671 g001
Figure 2. CPK2 physically interacts with ABI5. (A) Split LUC assay. CPK2-nLUC and ABI5-cLUC constructs were transiently expressed in N. benthamiana leaves. The pseudocolor scale represents LUC fluorescence intensity, reflecting the strength of protein interaction, with blue indicating low, green to yellow medium, and red high signal intensity. (B) GST pull-down analysis. MBP-CPK2-His was mixed with GST-ABI5 or GST and immobilized on GST beads. After washing, the eluted proteins were subjected to immunoblot analysis with anti-GST and anti-His antibodies, respectively. (C) Co-IP assays showing that CPK2 associates with ABI5 in vivo. CPK2-HA was co-expressed with ABI5-GFP or GFP in N. benthamiana leaves, and then the total proteins were extracted and incubated with GFP beads (MBL). The total and precipitated proteins were subjected to immunoblotting with GFP and HA antibodies, respectively.
Figure 2. CPK2 physically interacts with ABI5. (A) Split LUC assay. CPK2-nLUC and ABI5-cLUC constructs were transiently expressed in N. benthamiana leaves. The pseudocolor scale represents LUC fluorescence intensity, reflecting the strength of protein interaction, with blue indicating low, green to yellow medium, and red high signal intensity. (B) GST pull-down analysis. MBP-CPK2-His was mixed with GST-ABI5 or GST and immobilized on GST beads. After washing, the eluted proteins were subjected to immunoblot analysis with anti-GST and anti-His antibodies, respectively. (C) Co-IP assays showing that CPK2 associates with ABI5 in vivo. CPK2-HA was co-expressed with ABI5-GFP or GFP in N. benthamiana leaves, and then the total proteins were extracted and incubated with GFP beads (MBL). The total and precipitated proteins were subjected to immunoblotting with GFP and HA antibodies, respectively.
Plants 14 02671 g002
Figure 3. CPK2 phosphorylates ABI5. (A) In vitro phosphorylation assay showing the phosphorylation of ABI5 at Ser 42, Ser 145, and Thr 201 by CPK2. Phospho-dead variants of ABI5 were generated by mutation of serine/threonine residues at 42, 145, and 201 to alanine (A). (B) The relative phosphorylation signals of ABI5, as shown in (A), were analyzed using Image J (version 1.51j8). Statistics were performed using one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s multiple comparisons test between samples. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001. Data are mean ± SD. (C) Split LUC assay. CPK2-nLUC and different variant ABI5-cLUC constructs were transiently expressed in N. benthamiana leaves. The pseudocolor scale represents LUC fluorescence intensity, reflecting the strength of protein interaction, with blue indicating low, green to yellow medium, and red high signal intensity.
Figure 3. CPK2 phosphorylates ABI5. (A) In vitro phosphorylation assay showing the phosphorylation of ABI5 at Ser 42, Ser 145, and Thr 201 by CPK2. Phospho-dead variants of ABI5 were generated by mutation of serine/threonine residues at 42, 145, and 201 to alanine (A). (B) The relative phosphorylation signals of ABI5, as shown in (A), were analyzed using Image J (version 1.51j8). Statistics were performed using one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s multiple comparisons test between samples. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001. Data are mean ± SD. (C) Split LUC assay. CPK2-nLUC and different variant ABI5-cLUC constructs were transiently expressed in N. benthamiana leaves. The pseudocolor scale represents LUC fluorescence intensity, reflecting the strength of protein interaction, with blue indicating low, green to yellow medium, and red high signal intensity.
Plants 14 02671 g003
Figure 4. CPK2 is involved in the regulation of ABA-induced ABI5 gene expression and ABI5 protein stability. (A) Expression of ABI5 in Col-0 and cpk2 mutants. Seven-day-old seedlings of different genotypes were treated with or without 10 μM ABA for 3 h, and ABI5 gene expression was detected by qRT-PCR. Values are means ± SD, n = 3. Statistics were performed using Student’s t-test (* p < 0.05). (B) ABI5 protein abundance in Col-0 and cpk2 mutants after ABA treatment for different times. Seven-day-old Col-0 and cpk2 mutant seedlings were first treated with 10 μM ABA and then harvested at the indicated times after treatment. The ABI5 protein was detected by western blot assay using ABI5 antibodies. Anti-Actin was used as a sample loading control. (C) Quantification of protein intensities from (B), normalized to wild-type control (set as 1.0). Statistics were performed using one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s multiple comparisons test between samples. * p < 0.05; ns indicates no significant difference. Data are presented as means ± SD (n = 3).
Figure 4. CPK2 is involved in the regulation of ABA-induced ABI5 gene expression and ABI5 protein stability. (A) Expression of ABI5 in Col-0 and cpk2 mutants. Seven-day-old seedlings of different genotypes were treated with or without 10 μM ABA for 3 h, and ABI5 gene expression was detected by qRT-PCR. Values are means ± SD, n = 3. Statistics were performed using Student’s t-test (* p < 0.05). (B) ABI5 protein abundance in Col-0 and cpk2 mutants after ABA treatment for different times. Seven-day-old Col-0 and cpk2 mutant seedlings were first treated with 10 μM ABA and then harvested at the indicated times after treatment. The ABI5 protein was detected by western blot assay using ABI5 antibodies. Anti-Actin was used as a sample loading control. (C) Quantification of protein intensities from (B), normalized to wild-type control (set as 1.0). Statistics were performed using one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s multiple comparisons test between samples. * p < 0.05; ns indicates no significant difference. Data are presented as means ± SD (n = 3).
Plants 14 02671 g004
Figure 5. CPK2 and ABI5 genetically interact to regulate ABA responses in Arabidopsis. (A) Phenotypic analyses of the root growth of different genotypes. Seeds were germinated and grown vertically on 1/2 MS medium or 1/2 MS medium with 10 μM ABA for 10 days. (B) Primary root length was measured from (A). Data are presented as means ± SD (n = 3). Statistical analysis was performed using two-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s multiple comparisons test within the same treatment. Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences among genotypes (p < 0.05). Dots and squares represent individual root length measurements, with symbol type used to distinguish experimental conditions. Scale bars, 1 cm. (C) Germination rate was recorded from (D). Data are presented as means ± SD (n = 3). Statistical analysis was performed using two-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s multiple comparisons test within the same treatment. Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences among genotypes (p < 0.05); ns indicates no significant difference. Dots and squares represent individual root length measurements, with symbol type used to distinguish experimental conditions. Data are presented as means ± SD (n = 3). Scale bars, 1 cm. (D) Seed germination phenotypes. Seeds were sown on 1/2 MS medium with or without 0.5 μM ABA and grown for 3 days.
Figure 5. CPK2 and ABI5 genetically interact to regulate ABA responses in Arabidopsis. (A) Phenotypic analyses of the root growth of different genotypes. Seeds were germinated and grown vertically on 1/2 MS medium or 1/2 MS medium with 10 μM ABA for 10 days. (B) Primary root length was measured from (A). Data are presented as means ± SD (n = 3). Statistical analysis was performed using two-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s multiple comparisons test within the same treatment. Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences among genotypes (p < 0.05). Dots and squares represent individual root length measurements, with symbol type used to distinguish experimental conditions. Scale bars, 1 cm. (C) Germination rate was recorded from (D). Data are presented as means ± SD (n = 3). Statistical analysis was performed using two-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s multiple comparisons test within the same treatment. Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences among genotypes (p < 0.05); ns indicates no significant difference. Dots and squares represent individual root length measurements, with symbol type used to distinguish experimental conditions. Data are presented as means ± SD (n = 3). Scale bars, 1 cm. (D) Seed germination phenotypes. Seeds were sown on 1/2 MS medium with or without 0.5 μM ABA and grown for 3 days.
Plants 14 02671 g005
Figure 6. A proposed model of CPK2 functions in ABA-mediated seed germination and root growth inhibition in Arabidopsis. ABA binds to PYL/PYR receptors, which inhibit PP2Cs and lead to the activation of SnRK2s. Activated SnRK2s phosphorylate downstream effectors such as ABI5 to mediate ABA signaling. CPK2, a calcium-dependent protein kinase (CPK) family member, activated by unknown upstream signals, enhances ABA-mediated ABI5 expression and the ABI5 protein stability by interacting and phosphorylating it, as a result, exacerbates the ABA inhibition of seed germination and root growth.
Figure 6. A proposed model of CPK2 functions in ABA-mediated seed germination and root growth inhibition in Arabidopsis. ABA binds to PYL/PYR receptors, which inhibit PP2Cs and lead to the activation of SnRK2s. Activated SnRK2s phosphorylate downstream effectors such as ABI5 to mediate ABA signaling. CPK2, a calcium-dependent protein kinase (CPK) family member, activated by unknown upstream signals, enhances ABA-mediated ABI5 expression and the ABI5 protein stability by interacting and phosphorylating it, as a result, exacerbates the ABA inhibition of seed germination and root growth.
Plants 14 02671 g006
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Liang, X.; Zhu, W.; Xu, W.; Liang, J. CPK2 Enhances ABA Sensitivity in Seed Germination and Root Growth by Promoting ABA-Induced ABI5 Expression and ABI5 Protein Stability. Plants 2025, 14, 2671. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants14172671

AMA Style

Liang X, Zhu W, Xu W, Liang J. CPK2 Enhances ABA Sensitivity in Seed Germination and Root Growth by Promoting ABA-Induced ABI5 Expression and ABI5 Protein Stability. Plants. 2025; 14(17):2671. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants14172671

Chicago/Turabian Style

Liang, Xiaoju, Wei Zhu, Weifeng Xu, and Jiansheng Liang. 2025. "CPK2 Enhances ABA Sensitivity in Seed Germination and Root Growth by Promoting ABA-Induced ABI5 Expression and ABI5 Protein Stability" Plants 14, no. 17: 2671. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants14172671

APA Style

Liang, X., Zhu, W., Xu, W., & Liang, J. (2025). CPK2 Enhances ABA Sensitivity in Seed Germination and Root Growth by Promoting ABA-Induced ABI5 Expression and ABI5 Protein Stability. Plants, 14(17), 2671. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants14172671

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop