Next Article in Journal
Two B-Box Proteins, GhBBX21 and GhBBX24, Antagonistically Modulate Anthocyanin Biosynthesis in R1 Cotton
Previous Article in Journal
Methodology-Dependent Reversals in Root Decomposition: Divergent Regulation by Forest Gap and Root Order in Pinus massoniana
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Morphology-Based Evaluation of Pollen Fertility and Storage Characteristics in Male Actinidia arguta Germplasm

1
Institute of Special Animals and Plants Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Changchun 130112, China
2
Pomology Institute, Jilin Academy of Agriculture Sciences, Gongzhuling 136100, China
3
Applied Technology Research and Development Center for Sericulture and Special Local Products of Hebei Universities, Institute of Sericulture, Chengde Medical University, Chengde 067000, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Plants 2025, 14(15), 2366; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants14152366
Submission received: 19 June 2025 / Revised: 17 July 2025 / Accepted: 22 July 2025 / Published: 1 August 2025
(This article belongs to the Section Plant Development and Morphogenesis)

Abstract

Actinidia arguta is a dioecious plant, and the selection of superior male germplasm is crucial for ensuring effective pollination of female cultivars, maximizing their economic traits, and achieving high-quality yields. This study evaluated 30 male germplasms for pollen quantity, germination capacity, storage characteristics, and ultrastructural features. Results revealed significant variation in pollen germination rates (1.56–96.57%) among germplasms, with ‘Lvwang’, ‘TL20083’, and ‘TG06023’ performing best (all >90% germination). The storage characteristics study demonstrated that −80 °C is the optimal temperature for long-term pollen storage in A. arguta. Significant variations were observed in storage tolerance among different germplasms. Among them, Lvwang exhibited the best performance, maintaining a germination rate of 97.40% after 12 months of storage at −80 °C with no significant difference from the initial value, followed by TT07063. Pollen morphology was closely correlated with fertility. High-fertility pollen grains typically exhibited standard prolate or ultra-prolate shapes, featuring a tri-lobed polar view and an elliptical equatorial view, with neat germination furrows and clean surfaces. In contrast, low-fertility pollen grains frequently appeared shrunken and deformed, with widened germination furrows and visible exudates. Based on these findings, the following recommendations are proposed: ① Prioritize the use of germplasms with pollen germination rates >80% as pollinizers; ② Establish a rapid screening system based on pollen morphological characteristics. This study provides important scientific basis for both male germplasm selection and efficient cultivation practices in A. arguta (kiwiberry).

1. Introduction

Actinidia arguta Sieb. et Zucc. (commonly known as kiwiberry or hardy kiwi) is a large deciduous vine belonging to the genus Actinidia within the family Actinidiaceae. This species is characterized by its distinctive fruit flavor, exceptional nutritional value, remarkable cold hardiness, and disease resistance. These traits make it both a highly valuable small-berry crop and an excellent parental resource for Actinidia hybridization breeding. A. arguta stands out as one of the most cold-tolerant species within the Actinidia genus, with dormancy survival capabilities extending to –30 °C [1]. This remarkable hardiness positions it as a commercially valuable small-berry crop for temperate and cold regions worldwide. Commercial production has expanded significantly since the early 2000s, with established orchards in New Zealand, the United States, Japan, Chile, and multiple European countries [2,3]. Despite China’s abundant wild genetic resources, large-scale commercial cultivation of A. arguta began only in 2010. According to available statistics, the total cultivated area in China reached approximately 5533 hectares by 2024 [4], demonstrating rapid industry development despite its relatively recent inception.
As a functionally dioecious species, A. arguta necessitates systematic male plant deployment in commercial orchards. The breeding of superior male cultivars is equally important as female cultivar selection. It ensures proper pollination and fertilization of female plants, enabling full expression of their economic traits and achieving high yield and premium fruit quality goals. However, research on the evaluation and breeding of male A. arguta genetic resources remains limited. In production, most allocated male plants are either seedlings or individuals with undefined flowering traits, leading to insufficient fertilization of female plants. This subsequently causes flower and fruit abscission, significantly reducing both fruit yield and quality. Among various floral characteristics used for male germplasm evaluation, flower quantity and pollen fertility serve as key quality indicators, with pollen fertility being the crucial factor directly affecting pollination, fruit set rate, and fruit size in female plants [5,6]. Preliminary investigations revealed significant variation in pollen germination rates (ranging from >90% to nearly 0%) among different male A. arguta germplasm under identical in vitro culture conditions, consistent with findings by wang [7].
In practical production, kiwifruit often suffers from insufficient natural pollination due to asynchronous flowering phenology between male and female flowers and unfavorable environmental conditions, leading to abnormal fruit development (e.g., misshapen fruits and reduced fruit weight). Artificial supplementary pollination serves as a key solution to this issue, with its effectiveness largely dependent on the maintenance of pollen viability. Since the interval between pollen collection and application may range from several hours to months, establishing an effective pollen storage system is crucial [8]. Studies have shown that pollen from most plant species can maintain viability for several years under low-temperature conditions ranging from −10 °C to −200 °C [9]. For Actinidia species, Bomben et al. [10] and Abreu and Oliveira [11] demonstrated that pollen can be effectively preserved for 54–160 weeks through temperature regulation. Notably, Naik et al. [12] demonstrated that kiwifruit pollen cryopreserved at −200 °C for 12 months maintained a 100% fruit set rate post-storage. However, systematic research on pollen storage characteristics in A. arguta remains relatively scarce, and further investigation is still needed regarding its optimal storage conditions and the storage stability variations among different male germplasms.
This study systematically evaluated 30 male A. arguta germplasm resources for key reproductive traits including flowering characteristics, pollen production, and germination rates, with the objective of identifying elite male genotypes with superior comprehensive traits. Through scanning electron microscopy (SEM) analysis, we conducted a thorough examination of pollen micromorphological features and investigated their correlations with pollen fertility. The findings provide both theoretical foundations for male cultivar breeding and practical guidance for optimal pollinizer selection in commercial orchards, offering significant potential for enhancing A. arguta yield and fruit quality.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Plant Materials

A total of 30 male germplasm accessions of A. arguta were collected from the National Woody Plant Germplasm Repository of Actinidia arguta of the Institute of Special Animal and Plant Sciences of the Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Zuojia Town, Jilin City, Jilin Province, China (44°00′ N; 126°01′ E). The tested germplasms were 10–20 years old, cultivated using a T-trellis system, and managed under standard agricultural practices.

2.2. Experimental Procedures

2.2.1. Flower Quantity Assessment and Collection

At the initial full bloom stage (when 15% of flowers had opened, On 13 June 2022), the evaluation of flowering characteristics was conducted for the 30 male germplasms, accompanied by sample collection. According to the visual evaluation criteria for flowering characteristics shown in Figure 1, the flower abundance was categorized into three levels: high (more than 50% of inflorescences had 6–7 flowers), medium (more than 50% of inflorescences had 4–5 flowers), and low (more than 50% of inflorescences had 1–3 flowers). Scores of 3, 2, and 1 were assigned to high, medium, and low abundance, respectively. For each germplasm resource, approximately 1000 large flower buds were collected at the pre-flowering stage. Anthers were carefully extracted using forceps, placed in sulfuric acid paper bags, and dried over silica gel at 25 ± 2 °C for 12 h to allow natural dehiscence and pollen release. The pollen was then filtered through 100–200 mesh sieves to remove anther debris and other impurities, yielding purified pollen for subsequent experiments.

2.2.2. Anther Number and Pollen Quantity Measurement

Closed large flower buds were selected for anther counting. Ten flowers constituted one replicate (three replicates total) to calculate the mean anther number per flower. For pollen quantification, 100 non-dehisced anthers were placed in centrifuge tubes and oven-dried at 35 °C. A 5 mL aliquot of 20% (w/v) sodium hexametaphosphate solution was added to the centrifuge tube, followed by thorough vortex mixing (≥30 s at 2000 rpm) to achieve homogeneous pollen suspension. A 0.5 mL aliquot was diluted to 5 mL, from which 1 µL was sampled for microscopic examination using an OLYMPUS SHE biological microscope (Olympus Corporation, Shinjuku, Tokyo, Japan). Pollen grains within the field of view were counted to determine the mean pollen count per anther. This procedure was repeated in triplicate.

2.2.3. Pollen Germination Rate Assay

Pollen germination was evaluated using in vitro culture. Pollen grains were evenly distributed on solid medium (0.01% boric acid + 0.03% calcium nitrate + 10% sucrose + 1% agar, pH 5.8) at an optimal density of 50–100 grains/mm2, which was predetermined to avoid overcrowding while ensuring sufficient sample size for statistical analysis. Petri dish lids were lined with filter paper to absorb excess moisture, followed by incubation at 20 °C in darkness for 5 h. Germination rates were determined by examining ≥50 pollen grains per field across 10 randomly selected microscopic fields (three replicates). Germination rate (%) = (germinated pollen grains/total pollen grains) × 100%.

2.2.4. Pollen Storage at Low and Ultra-Low Temperatures

Pollen from five genotypes (‘Lvwang’, ‘TL20083’, ‘TG09032’, ‘TG01081’, and ‘TG06023’) dried with silica gel for 12 h, was subjected to low-temperature or ultra-low temperature storage testing. The pollen samples of each germplasm were aliquoted into 2 mL sterile centrifuge tubes (0.5× g per tube), sealed, and stored in ziplock bags. The samples were preserved under three different temperature conditions: (1) 4 °C (laboratory refrigerator, ±1 °C fluctuation); (2) −20 °C (laboratory freezer, ±1 °C fluctuation); and (3) −80 °C (ultra-low temperature freezer, ±1 °C fluctuation). All samples were stored in the dark. The initial germination rate of the pollen samples was measured before the experiment. After storage periods of 2 months and 12 months, the samples were retrieved and thawed at 25 ± 2 °C, followed by germination rate assessment according to Section 2.2.3. Thawed samples were exclusively used for immediate testing and were not subjected to re-freezing for subsequent analyses. Three replicates were performed for each treatment.

2.2.5. Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM)

Desiccated pollen from all 30 male germplasms was mounted on stubs, gold-coated via ion sputtering, and imaged using an XL30 Feg ESEM system (FEI Company, Hillsboro, OR, USA). Morphological characterization was conducted, including comparative analysis of pollen features across all 30 germplasm accessions. Quantitative measurements of key morphological parameters (polar axis length, equatorial axis length, aperture length, and aperture width) were obtained using ImageJ software 1.x (National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA) with scale calibration.

2.2.6. Pollen Morphological Abnormality Analysis

Pollen morphology was classified as normal or aberrant (Figure 2 criteria) under SEM. Abnormal and slightly abnormal rates were quantified to evaluate morphological anomalies across germplasms.

2.2.7. Statistical Analysis

Analyses were performed using Excel and SAS 9.1 statistical software (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA). For significance testing of differences among different treatments for the same index, one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was performed followed by least significant difference (LSD) post hoc multiple comparisons. Correlation analysis between different indices was conducted using Pearson’s correlation coefficient. Data visualization was performed with SIGMA Plot 14.0 software (Systat Software Inc., San Jose, CA, USA).

3. Results

3.1. Floral Characteristics and Pollen Germination Capacity of Different Germplasms

As shown in Table 1, significant variations were observed among male germplasms in flower abundance, mean anther number per flower, and pollen quantity per anther. The evaluation identified: 20 germplasms with high flower abundance, 3 with medium abundance, 8 with low abundance. Anther number ranged from 36.0 to 64.5 per flower, with most germplasms (40–48). Three accessions (TT05022, TG01081, TG06081) exceeded 50 anthers/flower, while six showed <40. Pollen production varied from 12,875 to 42,250 grains/anther, TT08093 and TG06063 were the most productive.
Pollen germination rates varied significantly among male germplasms (1.56–96.57%). The highest germination rates were observed in Lvwang (96.57%), TL20083 (95.85%), TG06023 (93.47%) and TG01081 (87.84%). In contrast, TT04043 (1.56%), TL17061 (2.63%), TT07031 (3.18%), and TT03021 (4.33%) showed the lowest rates. These results demonstrate substantial genetic diversity in pollen viability among A. arguta male germplasms, providing a scientific basis for selecting superior pollinizers.

3.2. Pollen Storage at Low and Ultra-Low Temperatures

Figure 3 illustrates the pollen germination performance of five male A. arguta germplasm accessions under different storage temperatures (−80 °C, −20 °C, and 4 °C) across varying time periods (0, 2, and 12 months). Pre-storage assessments revealed that all tested germplasms exhibited pollen germination rates exceeding 78.60%, with Lvwang, TL20083, and TG06023 demonstrating exceptional performance by achieving rates above 90% (Figure 3). Pollen viability progressively declined across all storage temperatures over time. After 12 months at 4 °C, all germplasms except TG01081 (which showed only an 8.86% reduction) experienced significant viability losses ranging from 20.64% to 77.50%, with TG09032 displaying the most pronounced decline (77.50%) to a final germination rate of 1.11% (Figure 4A). In contrast, −20 °C storage resulted in comparatively smaller reductions, with Lvwang maintaining 90.11% germination (Figure 4B) after 12 months while TG09032 decreased by 41.72% (Figure 4C). Pollen storage at −80 °C was most effective, with Lvwang retaining 97.40% germination (Figure 4D), showing no significant difference from initial values and TG09032 maintaining 56.84% viability, significantly higher than that under other temperature treatments (p < 0.05). Comprehensive analysis confirmed −80 °C as the optimal storage condition, with the five germplasms ranked by 12-month germination performance as Lvwang > TL20083 > TG01081 > TG06023 > TG09032.

3.3. Pollen Morphological Characteristics of Different Germplasms

The morphological characteristics of pollen observed under a scanning electron microscope are shown in Table 2. The results indicate that pollen grains from various male A. arguta germplasms predominantly exhibited prolate shapes, displaying tri-lobed polar views and elliptical equatorial views. The pollen grain dimensions ranged from (21.56–33.80) μm × (10.27–19.84) μm. The germination pores types were primarily tricolporoidate (80.0%), with fewer tricolpate forms (20.0%), and some grains showed visible exudates from germination furrow. The germination pores measured 17.04–30.10 μm in length with neat edges, spaced 0.97–8.14 μm apart, and showed a polar/equatorial axis ratio of 1.80–2.21. Additionally, the pollen surfaces exhibited distinct wrinkled-blocky ornamentation, with significant variation in pattern depth among different germplasms.
Figure 5. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) observations of pollen morphology in male A. arguta germplasms. TT03021: (A1A3) Prolate, very few normal, most grains shrunken/deformed with widened apertures and visible exudates; TT04043: (B1B3) Hyperprolate, few apertures fissured, no exudates; TT07031: (C1C3) Prolate, few apertures fissured, no exudates; TT07063: (D1D3) Hyperprolate, very few shrunken; TL17093: (E1E3) Prolate, most deformed–shrunken/shortened, few apertures with exudates; TL12043: (F1F3) Prolate, multiple fissured apertures with exudates; TL20063: (G1G3) Prolate, relatively uniform, occasional deformations; Lvwang: (H1H3) Prolate, uniform; TG01081: (I1I3) Hyperprolate, relatively uniform; TG09032: (J1J3) Hyperprolate, Exceptionally uniform.
Figure 5. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) observations of pollen morphology in male A. arguta germplasms. TT03021: (A1A3) Prolate, very few normal, most grains shrunken/deformed with widened apertures and visible exudates; TT04043: (B1B3) Hyperprolate, few apertures fissured, no exudates; TT07031: (C1C3) Prolate, few apertures fissured, no exudates; TT07063: (D1D3) Hyperprolate, very few shrunken; TL17093: (E1E3) Prolate, most deformed–shrunken/shortened, few apertures with exudates; TL12043: (F1F3) Prolate, multiple fissured apertures with exudates; TL20063: (G1G3) Prolate, relatively uniform, occasional deformations; Lvwang: (H1H3) Prolate, uniform; TG01081: (I1I3) Hyperprolate, relatively uniform; TG09032: (J1J3) Hyperprolate, Exceptionally uniform.
Plants 14 02366 g005aPlants 14 02366 g005bPlants 14 02366 g005cPlants 14 02366 g005d
Significant morphological differences were observed in pollen grains among male germplasms. Lvwang and TG09032 exhibited highly uniform pollen morphology, characterized by typical prolate shapes with plump grains, uniform aperture widths, and absence of exudates. TG01081 pollen showed relative consistency, predominantly prolate but including some grains with shortened polar axes appearing as irregular prolate forms with uneven aperture widths.
In contrast, TT03021 displayed remarkable abnormalities, with only a small minority maintaining prolate shapes while most grains appeared shrunken and deformed, exhibiting significantly widened apertures accompanied by exudates. Although TT04043 pollen was mainly prolate, partial grains were shrunken with distorted apertures and minor exudates. While TT07031 produced plump, prolate pollen grains, they exhibited significantly widened germination apertures without exudates. TT07063 showed approximately 50% deformed grains, including shrunken forms and those lacking distinct polarity. TL17093 pollen was predominantly deformed with partial shrinkage and visible exudates at aperture sites. Although TL12043 grains maintained plumpness, all displayed distorted apertures with consistent exudation. These morphological variations provide critical microstructural criteria for assessing pollen fertility and selecting elite male germplasms in A. arguta breeding programs.
As shown in Table 3, correlation analysis of 12 traits revealed that flower abundance, mean anther number, and pollen quantity per anther showed no significant correlation with pollen germination rate or morphological characteristics. However, pollen germination rate was significantly positively correlated with normal pollen percentage, while exhibiting significant negative correlations with abnormal and slightly abnormal pollen percentages. Furthermore, normal pollen percentage was significantly negatively correlated with abnormal pollen percentage, slightly abnormal pollen percentage, equatorial axis length, and aperture spacing, but positively correlated with pollen germination rate and P/E ratio (polar/equatorial axis ratio). These results demonstrate intrinsic links between pollen morphology and fertility, providing critical criteria for selecting high-fertility male germplasms.

4. Discussion

As a functionally dioecious species, A. arguta necessitates deliberate male plant deployment in commercial orchards to ensure reproductive success. The breeding of superior male cultivars holds equal importance to female cultivar development in ensuring effective pollination and fertilization, optimal expression of commercially valuable traits, and the production of high-yielding, premium-quality fruits. Among the various floral characteristics used to evaluate male germplasm resources, flower abundance and pollen fertility emerge as the most critical selection criteria. Investigations of 30 male accessions demonstrated significant variability in flowering capacity, anther number per flower, and pollen production per anther. For commercial cultivation, germplasms exhibiting both profuse flowering and abundant pollen output should be prioritized for propagation, as these traits serve as reliable secondary indicators for identifying elite male genetic resources.
Beyond floral abundance and pollen quantity, pollen fertility emerges as the key determinant of pollination efficiency, fruit set rate, and final fruit size in female plants. Pollen viability and germination capacity are fundamental to successful pollination, which directly governs fruit quality and yield in A. arguta cultivars [13]. This parameter is especially critical for hybrid breeding programs and artificial pollination protocols. Various methods are available for assessing pollen fertility, including in vivo and in vitro germination assays, histochemical staining, and fertilization capability tests [14,15,16,17,18]. Among these, in vitro germination assays have gained widespread adoption due to their simplicity, efficiency, and reliable diagnostic value. By tracking pollen tube growth dynamics, this method provides accurate insights into germination potential and fertility levels [15,16,19,20,21,22].
Our study employed in vitro germination to evaluate male A. arguta germplasms, revealing striking variability in pollen germination rates (1.56–96.57%). Elite germplasms demonstrated >90% germination, whereas low-fertility accessions showed <10% viability, with some nearly complete sterility. Similarly, wang et al. [7] also found that the pollen activity of different kiwifruit cultivars (strains) varied significantly. Among the 41 samples, 87.8% of the samples had pollen activity between 40% and 80%, while the lowest was only 5.01%. The use of male germplasm with underdeveloped pollen or low germination rates for pollination significantly reduces fruit quality and yield, highlighting the importance of breeding and promoting male varieties with high pollen fertility for commercial production. Notably, some male germplasm exhibits normal stamen morphology and sufficient pollen production, yet their pollen germination rates remain extremely low. It is indirectly speculated that this phenomenon may be related to abnormal pollen structural development, providing important clues for further research into the mechanisms of pollen development.
Pollen storage stability and fertility are key criteria for evaluating male germplasm resources, particularly for ensuring successful artificial pollination and addressing asynchronous flowering issues in production systems. Research indicates that pollen longevity is primarily governed by genetic factors, but is also significantly influenced by environmental conditions, especially storage temperature [23]. This study compared the pollen preservation efficacy of five germplasms under three storage temperatures (4 °C, −20 °C, and −80 °C). The results demonstrated that pollen stored at −80 °C exhibited the smallest decline in germination rate after 12 months, significantly outperforming storage at 4 °C and −20 °C. This observation aligns with the advantages of ultra-low temperature storage (−80 °C) reported by Li et al. [24]. Additionally, Naik et al. [12] found that kiwifruit pollen stored at −200 °C for 12 months maintained a 100% fruit set rate, whereas pollen stored at room temperature and 4 °C failed to set fruit. In our study, even under identical −80 °C storage conditions, significant variations in viability retention were observed among different germplasms. The pollen storage stability ranking was ‘Lvwang’ > ‘TL20083’ > ‘TG01081’ > ‘TG06023’ > ‘TG09032’, confirming the decisive role of genetic factors in storage tolerance. For commercial production, we recommend adopting −80 °C ultra-low temperature storage technology and prioritizing pollen resources with high storage stability, as this approach effectively maintains pollen viability and ensures reliable artificial pollination quality.
Pollen morphological characteristics serve as crucial indicators for plant phylogenetic studies and taxonomic identification [25,26,27]. The ultrastructural features observed under scanning electron microscopy (SEM) play a definitive role in species differentiation [17,21,28]. This study revealed that A. arguta pollen exhibits typical prolate shapes (polar axis/equatorial axis ratio = 1.8–2.21) with predominantly tricolporate apertures (80%), consistent with the fundamental morphological characteristics of the Actinidia genus [29] and matching descriptions of A. arguta by Stasiak et al. [30]. However, these findings contrast with reports describing sub-spherical pollen with triporate features (P/E ratio = 1.37), suggesting that such morphological variations may result from different environmental conditions at collection sites, indicating potential geographical variation or phenotypic plasticity in Actinidia pollen morphology.
Significant progress has been made in understanding pollen abortion mechanisms, particularly the relationship between pollen sterility and microstructural abnormalities, which has been extensively studied in various plants including Gleditsia [31], Vitis [32], and Jasminum [33]. Early studies [34,35] also confirmed significant correlations between pollen fertility and morphological indices in citrus species. Our SEM observations of different A. arguta germplasms revealed substantial variations in pollen morphology. High-fertility germplasms produced uniform, typically prolate pollen grains with trilobed polar views and elliptical equatorial views. These grains appeared plump with uniform apertures and clean surfaces devoid of exudates. In contrast, low-fertility pollen predominantly produced shriveled and deformed grains with conspicuously wide apertures and prevalent exudates. All pollen grains displayed distinctive, regular exine ornamentation, though the depth of these patterns varied markedly among germplasms. Correlation analysis demonstrated significant relationships between pollen germination rates and morphological characteristics. These results suggest that low germination rates may directly correlate with abnormal pollen structures, potentially caused by genetic factors in the plants, though further verification is required. This demonstrates that pollen appearing normal macroscopically may exhibit abnormal microstructure. Conversely, pollen fertility might be indirectly inferred through microscopic structural examination. These findings establish a reliable foundation for rapid fertility assessment through morphological evaluation and develop a morphology-based screening method for selecting superior male A. arguta germplasms, providing important practical applications for enhancing breeding efficiency.

5. Conclusions

Significant variation in pollen germination rates (1.56–96.57%) was observed among different male A. arguta germplasms, with practical recommendation to prioritize cultivars or elite lines exhibiting >80% germination as pollinizers to ensure high yield and superior fruit quality. Ultra-low temperature storage at −80 °C enables long-term pollen preservation, although substantial inter-germplasm variation in storage tolerance was observed. A strong correlation exists between pollen fertility and morphological characteristics: high-fertility germplasms produce uniform, standard prolate grains with tri-lobed polar views, regular elliptical equatorial views, well-filled structures, neat apertures of consistent width, and clean surfaces devoid of exudates; whereas low-fertility pollen predominantly displays deformed/shrunken grains with aberrant apertures and exudates. The established rapid screening method based on pollen morphology provides a reliable and efficient technical approach for identifying elite germplasms, significantly enhancing breeding efficiency.

Author Contributions

H.Q. and B.Z. conceived the ideas for this paper. J.L., Y.L. and Y.Y. prepared the materials. S.F., P.X., Y.W. (Yanli Wang), Y.W. (Yue Wang), C.L. and W.L. analyzed the data and drew the figures. H.Q., Y.Z., X.C. and S.F. wrote the paper. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by Technology Department of Jilin Province (20240303116NC).

Data Availability Statement

The data generated in this study were freely available to any researcher.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare that are relevant to the content of this article.

References

  1. Latocha, P.; Jankowski, P.; Radzanowska, J. Genotypic difference in postharvest characteristics of hardy kiwifruit (Actinidia arguta and its hybrids), as a new commercial crop Part I. Sensory profiling and physicochemical differences. Food Res. Int. 2011, 44, 1936–1945. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Okamoto, G.; Goto, S. Juice Constituents in Actinidia Arguta Fruits Produced in Shinjo, Okayama; Okayama University: Okayama, Japan, 2005; Volume 94, pp. 9–13. [Google Scholar]
  3. Boyd, L.; McNeilage, M.; MacRae, E.; Ferguson, A.; Beatson, R.; Martin, P.; Williams, M. Development and commercialization of ‘baby kiwi’(Actinidia arguta Planch.). V. Int. Symp. Kiwifruit 2002, 610, 81–86. [Google Scholar]
  4. Zhang, Z.; Lin, M.; Qi, Q. Research progress on Actinidia arguta. China Fruits 2024, 11, 21–26. [Google Scholar]
  5. Cai, Z.Y.; Dong, L.; Wang, H.Q.; Qiu, W.; Su, W.; Ren, H.; Liu, Y. Pollen viability, stigma receptivity and their effect on fruit set of passionfruit at different flower developmental stages. J. Fruit. Sci. 2023, 40, 969–977. [Google Scholar]
  6. Quinet, M.; Jacquemart, A. Troubles in pear pollination: Effects of collection and storage method on pollen viability and fruit production. Acta Oecologica 2020, 105, 103558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Wang, S.; Zhong, M.; Liao, G.; Chen, L.; Xu, X. Comparison of pollen quantity and pollen viability of 41 male plants in Actinidia. Acta Agric. Univ. Jiangxiensis 2017, 39, 460–467. [Google Scholar]
  8. Shivanna, K.; Johri, B. The Angiosperm Pollen Structure and Function; Wiley Eastern Ltd.: New Delhi, India, 1985. [Google Scholar]
  9. Hanna, W.; Towill, L. Long term pollen storage. Plant Breed. Rev. 1995, 13, 179–207. [Google Scholar]
  10. Bomben, C.; Malossini, C.; Cipriani, G.; Testolin, R. Long term storage of kiwifruit pollen. Acta Hortic. 1999, 498, 105–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Abreu, I.; Oliveira, M. Fruit production in kiwifruit (Actinidia deliciosa) using preserved pollen. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 2004, 55, 565–569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Naik, S.; Rana, P.; Rana, V. Pollen storage and use for enhancing fruit production in kiwifruit (Actinidia deliciosa A. Chev.). J. Appl. Hortic. 2013, 15, 128–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Qin, H.; Zhang, B.; Ai, J.; Fan, S.; Yang, Y.; Wang, Z.; Song, H. Studies on pollen fertility of hardy kiwifruit (Actinidia arguta Planch.) two cultivars. Acta Bot. Boreali-Occident. Sin. 2017, 37, 909–914. [Google Scholar]
  14. Soares, T.; Silva, S.; Costa, M.; Santos-Serejo, J.; Souza, A.; Lino, L.; Souza, E.; Jesus, O. In vitro germination and viability of pollen grains of banana diploids Crop Breed. Appl. Biotechnol. 2008, 8, 111–118. [Google Scholar]
  15. Souza, E.; Souza, M.; Rossi, C.; Ledo, A. Martinelli Viability, storage and ultrastructure analysis of Aechmea bicolor (Bromeliaceae) pollen grains, an endemic species to the Atlantic Forest Euphytica. Euphytica 2015, 204, 13–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Souza, E.H.; Souza, F.V.; Rossi, M.L.; Packer, R.M.; Cruz-Barros, M.A.V.; Martinelli, A.P. Pollen morphology and viability in Bromeliaceae. An. Acad. Bras. Ciênc. 2017, 89, 3067–3082. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Santos, V.; Nievola, C.; Fidalgo, A.; Kanashiro, S.; Wanderley, M.; Gomes, E.; Luz, C. Floral morphology and pollen viability of an endangered and endemic Bromeliaceae species from the Atlantic Forest Grana. Grana 2021, 60, 327–346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Langedijk, N.; Kaufmann, S.; Vos, E.; Ottiger, T. Evaluation of methods to assess the quality of cryopreserved Solanaceae pollen. Sci. Rep. 2023, 13, 7344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Soares, T.; Jesus, O.; Souza, E.H.; Santos-Serejo, J.; Oliveira, E. Morphology and viability of pollen grains from passion fruit species (Passiflora spp.). Acta Bot. Bras. 2013, 27, 779–787. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Jayaprakash, P.; Peter, J.; Shajitha, P.; Balaji, V.; Nisha, R.; Geetha, M.; Sivasamy, M. Development of in vitro pollen germination protocol for recalcitrant triticale pollen (X Triticosecale Wittmack). Cereal Res. Commun. 2023, 51, 189–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Kumari, M.; Prasad, A.; ur Rahman, L.; Mathur, A.K.; Mathur, A. In vitro germination, storage and microscopic studies of pollen grains of four Ocimum species. Ind. Crops Prod. 2022, 177, 114445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Li, M.; Jiang, F.; Huang, L.; Wang, H.; Song, W.; Zhang, X.; Niu, L. Optimization of in vitro germination, viability tests and storage of Paeonia ostii pollen. Plants 2023, 12, 2460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Althiab-Almasaud, R.; Teyssier, E.; Chervin, C.; Johnson, M.; Mollet, J. Pollen viability, longevity, and function in angiosperms: Key drivers and prospects for improvement. Plant Reprod. 2024, 37, 273–293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Li, H.; Sun, Y.; Liu, Z.; Liu, G.; Chen, X. Study on Pollen Viability of Actinidia arguta. Liaoning For. Sci. Technol. 2018, 3, 32–33. [Google Scholar]
  25. Majeed, S.; Zafar, M.; Ahmad, M.; Kilic, O.; Sultana, S.; Raza, J.; Yaseen, G.; Gul, H.; Mir, S.; Jabeen, M. Pollen morphological investigations of family Cactaceae and its taxonomic implication by light microscopy and scanning electron microscopy. Microsc. Res. Tech. 2020, 83, 767–777. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Hayat, K.; Khan, W.M.; Khan, M.N.; Shah, S.N. Pollen morphological investigation of selected species of family Asteraceae from Pakistan by using light and scanning electron microscopy. Microsc. Res. Tech. 2023, 86, 1258–1273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Mog, B.; Veena, G.L.; Adiga, J.D.; Hebbar, K.B.; Manjesh, G.N.; Eradasappa, E.; Mohana, G.S.; Thandaiman, V.; Vanitha, K.; Yadav, A.K. Pollen morphological study and temperature effect on the pollen germination of cashew (Anacardium occidentale L.) varieties. Sci. Hortic. 2023, 314, 111957. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Souza, S.; Oliveira, R.; Aona, L.; Souza, F.; Soares, T.; Rossi, M.; Souza, E. Pollen morphology and viability of Tillandsia (Bromeliaceae) species by light microscopy and scanning electron microscopy. Microsc. Res. Tech. 2021, 84, 441–459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Silva, V.; Ribeiro, E.; Luizi-Ponzo, A.; Faria, A. Ultrastructure and pollen morphology of Bromeliaceae species from the Atlantic Rainforest in Southeastern Brazil. An. Acad. Bras. Ciênc. 2016, 88, 439–449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Stasiak, A.; Latocha, P.; Bieniasz, M. Effect of genetically diverse pollen on pollination, pollen tube overgrow, fruit set and morphology of kiwiberry (Actinidia arguta). Agronomy 2021, 11, 1814. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Liu, Q.; Yang, J.; Wang, X.; Zhao, Y. Studies on pollen morphology, pollen vitality and preservation methods of Gleditsia sinensis Lam.(Fabaceae). Forests 2023, 14, 243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Lukšić, K.; Zdunić, G.; Mucalo, A.; Marinov, L.; Ranković-Vasić, Z.; Ivanović, J.; Nikolić, D. Microstructure of Croatian Wild Grapevine (Vitis Vinifera Subsp Sylvestris Gmel Hegi) Pollen Grains Revealed by Scanning Electron Microscopy. Plants 2022, 11, 1479. [Google Scholar]
  33. Deng, Y.; Liang, L.; Sun, X.; Jia, X.; Gu, C.; Su, J. Ultrastructural abnormalities in pollen and anther wall development may lead to low pollen viability in jasmine (Jasminum sambac (L.) Aiton, Oleaceae). S. Afr. J. Bot. 2018, 114, 69–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Wan, R.X.; Ma, J.Q. Preliminary study on pollen abortion in Lemon. China Citrus 1987, 4, 6–7. [Google Scholar]
  35. Wang, D. Study on Pollen Fertility of ‘Jincheng’ Orange. China Citrus 1989, 4, 11–13. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Evaluation of flower abundance in male Actinidia arguta germplasm. (a) High flower abundance, scores of 3. (b) Medium flower abundance, scores of 2. (c) Low flower abundance, scores of 1. Photographed on 15 June 2022.
Figure 1. Evaluation of flower abundance in male Actinidia arguta germplasm. (a) High flower abundance, scores of 3. (b) Medium flower abundance, scores of 2. (c) Low flower abundance, scores of 1. Photographed on 15 June 2022.
Plants 14 02366 g001
Figure 2. Comparative analysis of pollen morphological characteristics in male A. arguta germplasms reveals distinct ultrastructural differences between normal and abnormal grains under scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Normal pollen (indicated by orange arrows) exhibit intact prolate morphology with neatly defined apertures and clean exine surfaces, while moderately abnormal pollen (yellow arrows) display slight aperture deformation or minimal widening. Severely abnormal pollen (blue arrows) demonstrate pronounced morphological aberrations including collapsed structures, disorganized aperture patterns, and visible surface exudates.
Figure 2. Comparative analysis of pollen morphological characteristics in male A. arguta germplasms reveals distinct ultrastructural differences between normal and abnormal grains under scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Normal pollen (indicated by orange arrows) exhibit intact prolate morphology with neatly defined apertures and clean exine surfaces, while moderately abnormal pollen (yellow arrows) display slight aperture deformation or minimal widening. Severely abnormal pollen (blue arrows) demonstrate pronounced morphological aberrations including collapsed structures, disorganized aperture patterns, and visible surface exudates.
Plants 14 02366 g002
Figure 3. Pollen germination of different A. arguta germplasm accessions under different temperature storage conditions over varying durations. Different superscript lowercase letters denote statistically significant differences among treatments (p < 0.05), analyzed using the Least Significant Difference (LSD) multiple comparison method.
Figure 3. Pollen germination of different A. arguta germplasm accessions under different temperature storage conditions over varying durations. Different superscript lowercase letters denote statistically significant differences among treatments (p < 0.05), analyzed using the Least Significant Difference (LSD) multiple comparison method.
Plants 14 02366 g003
Figure 4. Pollen germination of A. arguta under different storage conditions. (A): ‘TG09032’ pollen failed to germinate after 12 months at 4 °C. (B): ‘Lvwang’ pollen germinated after 12 months at −20 °C. (C): ‘TG09032’ pollen showed significantly reduced germination after 12 months at −20 °C. (D): ‘Lvwang’ pollen maintained high germination after 12 months at −80 °C.
Figure 4. Pollen germination of A. arguta under different storage conditions. (A): ‘TG09032’ pollen failed to germinate after 12 months at 4 °C. (B): ‘Lvwang’ pollen germinated after 12 months at −20 °C. (C): ‘TG09032’ pollen showed significantly reduced germination after 12 months at −20 °C. (D): ‘Lvwang’ pollen maintained high germination after 12 months at −80 °C.
Plants 14 02366 g004
Table 1. Flowering capacity and pollen germination rates of different male germplasms.
Table 1. Flowering capacity and pollen germination rates of different male germplasms.
Germplasm IDVisual Evaluation of Flower AbundanceMean Anther NumberPollen Grains per AntherPollen Germination Rate (%)
TT03021240.2 hijk27,610 bcd4.33 k
TT04043142.4 fghij16,190 ijkl1.56 k
TT05022164.2 a16,625 ijkl17.62 j
TT06051143.6 efghi24,445 cdefg35.21 gh
TT06023344.6 defgh18,645 fghijkl26.44 i
TT07031239.0 ijk14,375 jkl3.18 k
TT07033136.0 k13,190 kl41.44 fg
TT07063137.4 jk20,875 defghij7.13 k
TT08093339.2 ijk42,250 a37.80 gh
TL21013344.6 defgh20,250 efghijk45.58 f
TL20083136.2 k28,065 bc95.85 a
TL18072344.6 defgh25,875 bcde32.85 hi
TL17093141.0 ghijk26,375 bcde18.04 j
Lvwang347.4 bcdef16,750 ijkl96.57 a
TL17061342.2 ghij16,690 ijkl2.63 k
TL15012141.0 ghijk12,875 l19.25 j
TL15022340.0 hijk16,190 ijkl36.03 gh
TL14101345.4 cdefg16,815 hijkl54.99 e
TL13091347.6 bcde20,815 defghij63.90 e
TL12043348.4 bcde24,315 cdefg17.65 j
TG02023245.8 cdefg17,355 ghijkl65.98 d
TG01081345.4 cdefg26,645 bcde87.84 b
TG04021351.0 b22,500 cdefghi47.32 f
TG06011339.8 hijk23,930 cdefgh58.25 e
TG06023348.6 bcde20,750 defghij93.47 ab
TG06063349.4 c32,315 b73.05 cd
TG06081346.0 bcdefg14,750 jkl34.30 gh
TG07053350.0 bc18,565 fghijkl37.66 gh
TG07031344.0 efghi24,690 cdef40.56 fg
TG09032348.4 bcde18,375 fghijkl78.48 c
Note: In the visual evaluation of flower abundance, numerical ratings represent: 1: Low flower abundance, 2: Medium flower abundance, 3: High flower abundance. Values followed by different lowercase letters within a column indicate statistically significant differences (p < 0.05), as determined by the Least Significant Difference (LSD) method for multiple comparisons.
Table 2. Principal morphological characteristics of pollen from male A. arguta germplasms.
Table 2. Principal morphological characteristics of pollen from male A. arguta germplasms.
Germplasm IDMorphological DescriptionPollen Size (Polar Axis × Equatorial Axis)/μmP/E RatioAperture TypeAperture Length/μmAperture Width/μmAbnormal Percentage/%Slightly Abnormal Percentage/%Figure
TT03021Prolate; very few normal; most grains shrunken/deformed with widened apertures and visible exudates(25.46–30.67) × (13.48–16.21)1.85Tricolporoidate21.17–25.951.05–3.9916.85 cdefg72.28 abFigure 5A1–A3
TT04043Hyperprolate; few shrunken grains; apertures with exudates(25.51–30.59) × (11.98–15.96)2.06Tricolporoidate (with exudate)22.29–28.071.81–2.9410.09 efghijk18.56 mnoFigure 5B1–B3
TT05022Prolate; few apertures fissured(23.52–27.97) × (12.76–14.73)1.88Tricolporate19.22–26.061.19–3.4815.7 cdefgh38.15 ghijk
TT06051Hyperprolate; few slightly deformed(25.27–31.78) × (11.70–16.11)2.19Tricolporoidate23.94–29.510.90–2.287.61 hijkl45.43 efghi
TT06023Hyperprolate; few slightly deformed; few apertures fissured(25.89–33.80) × (12.04–16.14)2.15Tricolporoidate22.65–30.101.73–3.048.11 ghijkl34.69 ghijk
TT07031Prolate; few apertures fissured; no exudates(24.85–30.17) × (13.08–19.60)1.93Tricolporoidate21.32–26.871.86–4.358.39 fghijkl30.83 ijklmFigure 5C1–C3
TT07033Hyperprolate; most apertures fissured; few deformed with exudates(25.02–30.37) × (12.57–16.03)2.03Tricolporate21.00–27.092.39–4.2517.74 cde35.24 ghijk
TT07063Hyperprolate; very few shrunken(22.19–30.92) × (10.27–13.78)2.21Tricolporoidate18.54–27.401.18–2.2715.48 cdefghi34.13 hijklFigure 5D1–D3
TT08093Prolate; most apertures fissured; few with exudates(25.36–29.38) × (11.88–14.96)1.93Tricolporate (with exudate)20.62–24.591.66–4.8917.25 cde75.92 a
TL21013Prolate; few shortened and slightly deformed(25.50–29.31) × (12.63–17.16)1.90Tricolporoidate22.69–26.540.97–3.237.5 hijkl44.15 efghi
TL20083Prolate; relatively uniform; occasional deformations(21.56–28.76) × (2.38–15.08)1.97Tricolporoidate18.47–25.761.14–3.790.71 l12.38 nopFigure 5G1–G3
TL18072Prolate; few apertures fissured(22.79–30.12) × (12.30–15.15)1.97Tricolporoidate21.08–28.241.61–5.1020.81 bc42.53 fghij
TL17093Prolate; most deformed–shrunken/shortened; few apertures with exudates(22.99–30.48) × (12.97–16.46)1.80Tricolporoidate (with exudate)17.04–26.081.51–4.1017.89 cde54.31 cdef Figure 5E1–E3
LvwangProlate; uniform(26.40–28.11) × (12.89–19.84)1.90Tricolporoidate22.09–25.361.76–3.513.06 jkl0.00 pFigure 5H1–H3
TL17061Prolate; few deformed–shrunken/triangular-pyramidal(23.72–27.53) × (11.57–16.34)1.87Tricolporoidate20.21–25.332.39–5.3319.15 bcd40.12 fghijk
TL15012Prolate; most apertures fissured; irregular surface(23.24–30.54) × (13.19–16.19)1.81Tricolporate, Tricolporoidate20.91–26.312.23–6.0517.09 cdef61.83 abcd
TL15022Prolate; few apertures fissured(25.23–29.75) × (12.57–15.42)1.99Tricolporoidate18.88–27.292.03–3.923.59 jkl58.52 bcde
TL14101Prolate; most apertures fissured and twisted(23.92–29.88) × (13.25–17.47)1.82Tricolporate, Tricolporoidate18.70–26.352.07–8.1427.02 b63.05 abc
TL13091Prolate; relatively uniform; occasional shrunken grains(26.75–28.43) × (12.82–18.02)1.95Tricolporoidate22.91–27.702.06–5.2620.21 bcd46.99 defgj
TL12043Prolate; multiple fissured apertures with exudates(26.47–29.96) × (14.21–17.82)1.81Tricolporate (with exudate)20.27–27.713.53–6.1940.55 a49.4 cdefgFigure 5F1–F3
TG02023Hyperprolate; relatively uniform(27.37–29.27) × (12.56–15.12)2.07Tricolporoidate21.61–25.911.40–2.650.63 l7.88 op
TG01081Hyperprolate; relatively uniform(25.42–28.29) × (11.93–14.29)2.04Tricolporoidate22.62–26.401.24–2.720.88 l6.29 opFigure 5I1–I3
TG04021Hyperprolate; very few normal; most grains shrunken/deformed with widened apertures and visible exudates(24.00–29.17) × (10.75–14.54)2.16Tricolporoidate19.21–25.631.81–4.367.45 hijkl43.83 efghi
TG06011Prolate; Generally uniform; Occasional deformed grains(26.08–28.73) × (12.14–16.50)1.90Tricolporoidate21.64–26.241.47–3.776.74 ijkl19.37 lmno
TG06023Hyperprolate; Minority slightly deformed(25.05–29.03) × (12.08–14.30)2.01Tricolporoidate22.79–26.991.64–2.862.87 kl25.89 klmn
TG06063Prolate; Relatively uniform; Minority slightly deformed(23.72–28.07) × (11.55–14.39)1.99Tricolporoidate21.54–26.151.08–1.930.93 l2.69 p
TG06081Prolate; Minority with fissured apertures; Pollen deformation present(23.78–30.32) × (13.75–16.66)1.83Tricolporoidate21.48–27.642.36–5.2511.62 defghijk31.28 ijklm
TG07053Hyperprolate; 50% deformed grains (partial shrinkage or triangular-pyramidal transformation)(23.42–28.96) × (11.59–14.51)2.01Tricolporoidate19.65–27.281.62–3.3611.65 cdefghi28.64 jklm
TG07030Hyperprolate; Isolated deformed grains(26.27–30.92) × (11.95–14.81)2.12 Tricolporoidate20.33–28.581.25–4.175.35 jkl40.73 fghijk
TG09032Hyperprolate; Exceptionally uniform(27.47–30.32) × (13.03–15.12)2.03 Tricolporoidate22.73–27.321.71–3.420 l9.04 opFigure 5J1–J3
Note: Values followed by different lowercase letters in a column differ significantly (p < 0.05), analyzed using the Least Significant Difference (LSD) multiple comparison method.
Table 3. Correlation analysis among different parameters.
Table 3. Correlation analysis among different parameters.
Visual Flower Abundance RatingMean Anther Number per FlowerPollen Grains per AntherPollen Germination RateNormal Pollen PercentageAbnormal Pollen PercentageSlightly Abnormal Pollen PercentagePolar Axis LengthEquatorial Axis LengthAperture LengthAperture SpacingPolar/Equatorial Axis Ratio (P/E)
Visual Flower Abundance Rating1
Mean Anther Number per Flower0.251
Pollen Grains per Anther0.17−0.121
Pollen Germination Rate0.350.160.181
Normal Pollen Percentage0.060.14−0.120.62 **1
Abnormal Pollen Percentage−0.060.010.00−0.55 **−0.82 **1
Slightly Abnormal Pollen Percentage−0.06−0.180.16−0.58 **−0.96 **0.63 **1
Polar Axis Length −0.03−0.23−0.24−0.140.02−0.080.011
Equatorial Axis Length0.08−0.10−0.22−0.25−0.44 *0.49 **0.37 *0.131
Aperture Length 0.110.04−0.270.050.30−0.31−0.270.73 **0.031
Aperture Spacing 0.18−0.07−0.17−0.30−0.65 **0.77 **0.52 **−0.040.65 **−0.191
Polar/Equatorial Axis Ratio (P/E)−0.09−0.050.050.120.40 *−0.48 **−0.310.47 **−0.81 **0.40 *−0.61 **1
Note: ** indicates significant difference at the 0.01 level; * indicates significant difference at the 0.05 level.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Qin, H.; Fan, S.; Zhao, Y.; Xu, P.; Chen, X.; Li, J.; Yang, Y.; Wang, Y.; Wang, Y.; Li, C.; et al. Morphology-Based Evaluation of Pollen Fertility and Storage Characteristics in Male Actinidia arguta Germplasm. Plants 2025, 14, 2366. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants14152366

AMA Style

Qin H, Fan S, Zhao Y, Xu P, Chen X, Li J, Yang Y, Wang Y, Wang Y, Li C, et al. Morphology-Based Evaluation of Pollen Fertility and Storage Characteristics in Male Actinidia arguta Germplasm. Plants. 2025; 14(15):2366. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants14152366

Chicago/Turabian Style

Qin, Hongyan, Shutian Fan, Ying Zhao, Peilei Xu, Xiuling Chen, Jiaqi Li, Yiming Yang, Yanli Wang, Yue Wang, Changyu Li, and et al. 2025. "Morphology-Based Evaluation of Pollen Fertility and Storage Characteristics in Male Actinidia arguta Germplasm" Plants 14, no. 15: 2366. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants14152366

APA Style

Qin, H., Fan, S., Zhao, Y., Xu, P., Chen, X., Li, J., Yang, Y., Wang, Y., Wang, Y., Li, C., Liu, Y., Zhang, B., & Lu, W. (2025). Morphology-Based Evaluation of Pollen Fertility and Storage Characteristics in Male Actinidia arguta Germplasm. Plants, 14(15), 2366. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants14152366

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop