Next Article in Journal
Establishment of an Efficient Agrobacterium rhizogenes-Mediated Hairy Root Transformation System for Functional Analysis in Passion Fruit
Previous Article in Journal
Impact of Snow on Vegetation Green-Up on the Mongolian Plateau
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Bioactive Potential of Rheum cordatum Losinsk. Leaf Extracts: Phytochemical Insights from Supercritical CO2, Subcritical Ethanol and Ultrasound-Assisted Extractions

1
Faculty of Biology and Biotechnology, Al-Farabi Kazakh National University, Almaty 050040, Kazakhstan
2
Institute of Genetic and Physiology, Al-Farabi 93, Almaty 050040, Kazakhstan
3
Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Art and Science, Cukurova University, Adana 01330, Türkiye
4
Department of Molecular Biology and Genetic, Faculty of Science and Arts, Harran University, Sanliurfa 63290, Turkey
5
Science and Technology Research and Application Center, Dicle University, Diyarbakir 21280, Türkiye
6
Department of Analytical Chemistry, Faculty of Pharmacy, Dicle University, Diyarbakir 21280, Türkiye
7
Department of Nutrition and Dietetics, Atatürk Faculty of Health Sciences, Dicle University, Diyarbakir 21280, Türkiye
8
Department of Biochemistry, Faculty of Pharmacy, Harran University, Sanliurfa 63290, Türkiye
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Plants 2025, 14(15), 2314; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants14152314 (registering DOI)
Submission received: 27 June 2025 / Revised: 19 July 2025 / Accepted: 23 July 2025 / Published: 26 July 2025
(This article belongs to the Section Phytochemistry)

Abstract

Rheum cordatum Losinsk is a plant species distributed in Kazakhstan but remains relatively understudied despite its promising biological potential. The present study aimed to explore leaf extracts of R. cordatum by utilizing advanced green extraction technologies including supercritical CO2 (ScCO2), subcritical ethanol (Sc) and ultrasound-assisted extraction (UAE) to characterize their phytochemical composition and evaluate their antioxidant and antimicrobial activities. A total of 53 phytochemical compounds were identified, with gallic acid (30.71 µg/mg UAE-EtOH-4h), rutin (21.93 µg/mg ScCO2-150) and hesperidin (14.98 µg/mg ScCO2-150) being notably abundant. Among the tested extracts, ScCO2 extraction at 150 bar (ScCO2-150) demonstrated the highest antioxidant activity, exhibiting IC50 values of 0.0132 mg/mL (DPPH) and 0.0462 mg/mL (ABTS), coupled with the highest total phenolic content (140 mg GAE/g). Moreover, the ScCO2-150 extract showed pronounced antimicrobial efficacy, particularly against Bacillus subtilis Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus aureus, with minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC) ranging from 125 to 250 µg/mL. These findings highlight the considerable potential of R. cordatum leaves as a valuable, abundant and sustainable source of natural antioxidants and antimicrobial agents, with supercritical CO2 extraction presenting substantial advantages in selectively obtaining bioactive phytochemicals.

1. Introduction

The genus Rheum (rhubarb), a prominent member of the Polygonaceae Juss. Family, has been cultivated and utilized for over 5000 years [1]. Its natural distribution spans temperate zones of the Himalayas and northwestern China, as well as Europe and North America. Notable species include R. tanguticum Maxim., R. officinale Baill., R. palmatum, L. R. acuminatum Hook. f. & Thomson. and R. australe D. Don, which are predominantly found in Europe and southwestern China. In contrast, R. rhabarbarum L. and R. rhaponticum L. are widespread across Europe, North America and parts of Asia, exhibiting diverse geographic patterns.
Members of the genus Rheum L. are perennial herbaceous plants characterized by robust rhizomes and considerable morphological variability. The stems which emerge in the plant’s second or third year are typically erect, tall and thick, and may be hollow or filled depending on the species [2]. The aerial stems are annual, while the basal leaves are large with long petioles and serrated margins [3]. Inflorescences are terminal panicles bearing predominantly bisexual flowers in a variety of colors [4].
Historically, rhubarb has played a significant role in traditional Chinese medicine (TCM), since at least 270 BCE, when it was known as “Da Huang” or “Jiang Jun” [5]. It was highly esteemed for its medicinal properties and used both as food and a remedy. Ancient formulations, such as Sanhuang Xiexin-Tang and Dahuang Zhechun tablets, exemplify its longstanding therapeutic use [6]. Traditionally, rhubarb was served as a potent laxative [7,8], and was also believed to enhance digestion and appetite. It was used in the treatment of jaundice [9], gastrointestinal bleeding and gastritis [10,11]. Today, rhubarb is included in many Chinese preparations used for the treatment of liver diseases and inflammation, as well as for the prevention of liver fibrosis [12]. Beyond its laxative properties, rhubarb exhibits well-documented anti-inflammatory [13,14], antioxidant [15] antimicrobial [16], antitumor and antidiabetic activities [17,18,19,20].
Numerous phytochemicals have been isolated from various Rheum species, including anthraquinones stilbenoids, flavonoids, anthocyanins, organic acids, chromanones, vitamins and tannins [21]. These bioactive compounds have been identified in both aerial and underground parts of species such as Rheum emodi, R. rhaponticum and R. rhabarbarum. Out of approximately sixty known species [22], nine are listed in the flora of Kazakhstan [23], with seven species currently found in the region, including Rheum cordatum [24,25]. Owing to threats of extinction, R. wittrockii and R. compactum were added to the Red Book of Kazakhstan in 2014 [26].
From a chemotaxonomic perspective, it is reasonable to expect that Kazakh Rheum species possess similar phytoconstituents and therapeutic effects. Among them, Rheum cordatum Losinsk. (commonly known as heart-shaped rhubarb) is a promising yet under-explored species. It naturally occurs in the Chu-Ili Mountains the Western Tien Shan and Karatau, and is known to contain high concentrations of biologically active substances (BAS) [27]. Although earlier research by our group focused on the roots [28,29], the present study investigates for the first time the phytochemical composition and biological activity of R. cordatum leaf extracts obtained via green extraction technologies. This shift in focus to the leaves is driven by the sustainability of leaf harvesting, as it is non-destructive, and by growing interest in the therapeutic potential of aerial plant parts.
In this study we applied modern green extraction methods, including supercritical CO2 extraction (ScCO2), subcritical ethanol extraction (sbcEtOH) and ultrasound-assisted extraction (UAE), to obtain a broad spectrum of secondary metabolites with notable antioxidant and antimicrobial properties. These techniques offer advantages such as reduced solvent usage, shorter extraction times, high selectivity and the elimination of toxic solvents [29]. Nevertheless, the phytochemical profile and pharmacological potential of R. cordatum leaves remain inadequately studied.
Extraction efficiency depends not only on the yield but also on the qualitative composition of the extract, as different methods can favor the isolation of distinct types of bioactive compounds [30,31]. Conventional methods, such as maceration hydrodistillation, infusion and percolation are associated with limitations, including low efficiency, long extraction times and high solvent consumption, which can hinder research productivity [32]. Additionally, these methods often yield inconsistent results and have limited selectivity. Such shortcomings have encouraged the adoption of advanced green technologies, including UAE [33,34,35], ScCO2 [36,37] and sbcEtOH [38], which better preserve thermolabile compounds and minimize environmental impact [39,40].
However, each green method has its own constraints. ScCO2 extraction requires costly high-pressure equipment and is less effective for polar compounds [41]. UAE can suffer from uneven energy distribution and potential heat-induced degradation [42]. Subcritical ethanol extraction while effective operates under high temperature and pressure, which may compromise certain bioactives. These considerations should be taken into account when selecting appropriate methods for specific target compounds [43].
Despite the well-documented medicinal value of rhubarb roots, the leaves of R. cordatum remain largely under-explored. Historically, plant-based antimicrobials were utilized long before modern antibiotics [44]. In light of escalating antibiotic resistance and limitations of synthetic drugs, such as amoxicillin and fluoroquinolones, interest in phytotherapy is increasing. This underscores the need to identify novel natural antimicrobials, including those derived from Rheum species [45].
In response to the global demand for sustainable natural antioxidants and antimicrobials, this study aims to fill the existing knowledge gap by investigating the phytochemical composition and bioactivity of R. cordatum leaf extracts obtained using green extraction techniques. The findings may facilitate the valorization of R. cordatum leaves as a valuable resource for pharmaceutical and nutraceutical applications.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Plant Material

The subject of this research is the leaves of the plant Rheum cordatum Losinsk. collected in the Zhambyl region, Korday district, in the Southern foothills of the Chu-Ili mountains (geolocation: 43°16′42.0″ N 74°51′23.0″ E, found on rocky slopes approximately 1200 m above sea level) on 20 April 2024. The collected Rheum cordatum Losinsk. plant was verified at the “Institute of Botany and Phytointroduction” in Almaty Kazakhstan. Freshly collected leaves were dried under vacuum conditions at a temperature range of 45–50 °C in order to retain the integrity of bioactive constituents. The dried plant material was ground to a fine uniform powder. While the particle size was not quantitatively measured, the resulting powder was visually consistent and of small enough size (estimated below 500 µm) to provide a high surface area for efficient extraction. After drying, the plant material was stored in white kraft zip-lock pouches at room temperature, protected from light and moisture, and transported to Harran University (Şanlıurfa Turkey).

2.2. Extraction Methods

2.2.1. Ultrasound-Assisted Extraction (UAE)

Ultrasound-assisted extraction experiments on powdered Rheum cordatum Losinsk. leaves were carried out using an Elmasonic Select 150 ultrasonic bath (Elma Schmidbauer GmbH Singen Germany), operating at a fixed frequency of 37 kHz and a total power output of 1100 W. The device was operated at 220–240 V with a bath dimension of 19.9 × 11.8 inches (surface area) and 3.9 inches depth.
The extractions were conducted at ambient room temperature (22–25 °C). The temperature of the solvent was periodically monitored using a digital thermometer and did not exceed 40 °C during sonication. To prevent overheating, the ultrasonic bath was turned off briefly every 20 min to allow for passive cooling. No mechanical stirring was applied during extraction, but the sample tubes were manually shaken at regular intervals to improve solvent contact and minimize concentration gradients.
The experiments were performed at room temperature using two different extraction durations (1 h and 4 h) and two different solvents [ethanol (EtOH) and methanol (MeOH)]. In each experiment, 2 g of plant root and 30 mL of solvent were combined in capped 50 mL PTFE sample tubes. All extractions were performed in triplicate. Extraction efficiency was calculated using Equation (1). After collection, the extracts were dried and stored at 4 °C until further analysis.
Yield (%) = (mass of dry extract/mass of dry plant material) × 100

2.2.2. Subcritical Ethanol Extraction (Sc)

The experiments were conducted using a laboratory-designed device for subcritical solvent extraction. Subcritical ethanol extraction (Sc) was performed using 1 g of plant root at 140 °C and under different pressures (60 and 80 atm). The solvent was introduced into the extraction cell at a flow rate of 1 mL per min until the desired pressure was reached. Once the target parameters were achieved, the extraction process consisted of a 30 min static extraction, followed by a 20 min dynamic extraction using ethyl alcohol at a flow rate of 2 mL per min. The extraction yield was calculated using Equation (1), expressed as the ratio of the extract mass to the initial dry material mass. All extractions were conducted in triplicate. The extracts were collected, dried, and stored at 4 °C.

2.2.3. Supercritical CO2 Extraction (ScCO2)

Supercritical extraction was conducted using a SuperEx F-500 system (Konya, Türkiye). In total, 25 g of leaf powder was packed into a polyester pouch and placed in the extraction vessel. The temperature was set at 60 °C, and pressure conditions were set to 100 bar (SCO2-100) and 150 bar (ScCO2-150). The extraction time was 60 min. The extraction yield was calculated using Equation (1). All extractions were performed in triplicate. The extracts were collected dried and stored at 4 °C.

2.3. Phytochemical Analysis by LC-MS/MS

The quantitative profiling of 53 phytochemicals in the Rheum cordatum Losinsk. extracts was conducted using a Shimadzu Nexera ultrahigh-performance liquid chromatography (UHPLC) system coupled with a Shimadzu LCMS-8040 tandem mass spectrometer (Kyoto, Japan) [46]. The UHPLC system was equipped with a SIL-30AC autosampler CTO-10ASvp column oven LC-30AD binary pumps and DGU-20A3R degasser. Chromatographic separation was achieved using an Agilent Poroshell 120 EC-C18 column, Santa Clara, CA, USA) (150 mm × 2.1 mm 2.7 µm) maintained at 40 °C. The mobile phases consisted of (A) water with 5 mM ammonium formate and 0.1% formic acid, and (B) methanol with 5 mM ammonium formate and 0.1% formic acid. The gradient elution program was as follows: 20–100% B from 0 to 25 min, 100% B from 25 to 35 min, and back to 20% B from 35 to 45 min. The flow rate was 0.5 mL/min and the injection volume was set at 5 µL.
Mass spectrometric detection was performed using an electrospray ionization (ESI) source operating in both positive and negative ionization modes. The instrument was controlled by LabSolutions LCMS Ver. 5.99 software (Shimadzu), and data were acquired in multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) mode. The MRM transitions were optimized for each phytochemical to ensure that selective quantification and collision energies were individually tuned to generate optimal fragmentation patterns. Identification was confirmed by comparing retention times and MRM transitions with those of authentic reference standards (≥98% purity Sigma-Aldrich). For compounds without available standards, MS/MS fragmentation patterns were used for tentative identification based on the literature and spectral libraries.
The source conditions were as follows: drying gas (N2) flow rate 15 L/min, nebulizing gas 3 L/min, desolvation line (DL) temperature 250 °C, heat block temperature 400 °C and interface temperature 350 °C. The limits of detection (LODs) and quantification (LOQs) for all analyzed phenolic compounds were determined during method validation, and are provided in Supplementary Table S1. Each LC-MS/MS measurement was conducted in triplicate to ensure analytical reliability.

2.4. Antioxidant Activity Assays

2.4.1. DPPH Radical Scavenging Assay

The free radical scavenging activity of Rheum cordatum leaf extracts was determined using the DPPH (11-diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl) method as described in our previous study [47]. Samples were prepared at a concentration of 1 mg/mL, and various concentrations of these samples and standard antioxidants (Trolox BHA and BHT) were placed into test tubes. In total, a 0.1 M 0.5 mL solution of DPPH radical was added to each mixture and the total volume was adjusted to 3 mL using ethanol. The mixtures were then vortexed thoroughly and incubated in the dark for 30 min at room temperature. Absorbance differences were measured at a wavelength of 517 nm using a UV spectrophotometer (Shimadzu UV-1280, Shimadzu Corporation, Kyoto, Japan). A control sample was prepared by adding 0.5 mL of DPPH radical to 2.5 mL of ethanol, with ethanol used as the blank. All measurements were performed in triplicate (n = 3). The results were expressed as IC50 values (mg/mL), representing the concentration required to inhibit 50% of the DPPH radicals [48].

2.4.2. ABTS Radical Scavenging Assay

The ABTS free radical scavenging activity was carried out with minor modifications, as described in our previous study [49]. The ABTS radical was prepared by adding 2.45 nM persulfate solution to 7 mM ABTS solution. Different concentrations of the prepared stock solutions and standard antioxidants (Trolox BHA and BHT) were placed into test tubes and made up to a final volume of 2.0 mL with ethanol. Subsequently, 0.5 mL of ABTS radical was added to the solutions, which were vortexed and incubated in the dark for 30 min. Absorbance values were measured at a wavelength of 734 nm, using a UV spectrophotometer. In the experiment, a control sample was prepared by adding 0.5 mL of ABTS radical to 2.0 mL of ethanol, with ethanol used as the blank. The results were expressed as IC50 (mg/mL). All measurements were carried out in triplicate (n = 3).

2.4.3. Total Phenolic Content (TPC)

Total polyphenols were calculated using the gallic acid calibration curve at different concentrations [50]. In total, 50 µL of extracts and 1 mL distilled water were added to each mixture. Subsequently, 25 µL of Folin–Ciocalteu reagent was added to the mixture. After 3 min of incubation, 40 µL of 20% sodium carbonate (Na2CO3) was added vortexed and incubated in the dark at room temperature for two hours. Absorbance values were measured at 760 nm using a UV spectrophotometer (Shimadzu UV-1280). The corresponding equivalent amount of gallic acid for the measured absorbance values was calculated. The assay was performed in triplicate (n = 3). The results were expressed as mg GAE/mg extract.

2.5. Antimicrobial Activity

2.5.1. Microorganism Cultivation

The antimicrobial potential of eight Rheum cordatum extracts was evaluated against a panel of bacterial and fungal strains. The tested microorganisms included Gram-positive bacteria, including Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 25923, Enterococcus faecalis ATCC 29212, Bacillus spizizenii ATCC 6633 and Klebsiella pneumoniae ATCC 13883; Gram-negative bacteria, including Escherichia coli ATCC 25292 and Pseudomonas aeruginosa; and fungal strains, including Candida albicans ATCC 10231 and Candida tropicalis ATCC 27422.
All bacterial strains were reactivated from cryostorage in 4 mL of Nutrient Broth (NB), and fungal strains in Sabouraud Dextrose Broth (SDB). The cultures were incubated overnight at 37 °C. Prior to experiments, the cell suspensions were adjusted to a turbidity equivalent to the 0.5 McFarland standard (approximately 1.5 × 108 CFU/mL). Plant extracts were dissolved in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) to prepare a stock solution of 1000 µg/mL. Working solutions of 1000, 500, 250 and 62.5 µg/mL were prepared by serial dilution in sterile distilled water [51].

2.5.2. Agar Well Diffusion Assay

The antimicrobial activity of the extracts was assessed using the agar well diffusion method as described by Holder and Boyce (1994), with minor modifications [52]. Mueller–Hinton agar plates (for bacteria) and Sabouraud dextrose agar plates (for fungi) were inoculated with standardized microbial suspensions using a sterile Drigalski loop. Wells of 6 mm diameter were aseptically punched into the agar, and 50 µL of extract at the designated concentrations was added into each well. The plates were first pre-incubated at 4 °C for 15 min to allow for compound diffusion, followed by incubation at 37 °C for 24 h. Zones of inhibition were measured in millimeters using a digital caliper. Ampicillin and nystatin were used as positive controls for bacteria and fungi, respectively.

2.5.3. Determination of MIC and MBC

Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) and minimum bactericidal concentration (MBC) values were determined using the broth microdilution method in sterile 96-well microplates. Each well was filled with 250 µL of Mueller–Hinton Broth (MHB), and serial two-fold dilutions of the extracts (1000 to 125 µg/mL) were prepared. Then, 10 µL of each microbial suspension (0.5 McFarland) was added to the wells.
The plates were incubated at 37 °C for 24 h, and microbial growth was assessed by measuring absorbance at 600 nm using a microplate reader. Wells containing only media and microbial inoculum served as negative controls; wells with standard antibiotics (ampicillin for bacteria nystatin for fungi) were used as positive controls. MBC was defined as the lowest extract concentration resulting in no visible growth upon sub-culturing on fresh agar plates.

2.6. Biofilm Inhibition Assay

The antibiofilm activity of the extracts was evaluated in the same 96-well microplates used for MIC assays. After incubation, planktonic cells were discarded, and wells were gently washed with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) to remove non-adherent cells. The plates were air-dried and then stained with 0.1% crystal violet for 20 min.
Excess dye was removed by rinsing with distilled water. Subsequently, 95% ethanol was added to solubilize the retained dye, and absorbance was measured at 595 nm. The percentage of biofilm inhibition was calculated relative to untreated controls. BIC90 (90% biofilm inhibition concentration) values were determined from inhibition curves. Tetracycline was used as the positive control for biofilm inhibition, and wells without extract served as negative controls. This method was adapted from Chaieb et al. (2011) and Bowler et al. (2020) [53,54].

3. Results

3.1. Extraction Yield and Efficiency

The extraction yields of Rheum cordatum Losinsk. leaf samples varied considerably depending on the method solvent and processing conditions. Among all tested methods, subcritical ethanol extraction at 140 °C and 80 atm (Sc-80) exhibited the highest yield (27.71%), followed by Sc-60 (22.94%). Ultrasound-assisted extraction (UAE) using ethanol for 4 h resulted in a yield of 16.73%, which was higher than that of methanol under the same conditions (15.99%). Overall, subcritical ethanol proved to be the most efficient technique, likely due to its ability to modify the physicochemical properties of ethanol (e.g., viscosity density and pKa), enhancing solute penetration and mass transfer.

3.2. Phytochemical Profiling by LC-MS/MS

The phytochemical composition of Rheum cordatum Losinsk. leaf extracts was comprehensively analyzed using LC-MS/MS. Across the different extraction methods, a total of 53 compounds were detected, including phenolic acids, flavonoids, stilbenes, coumarins and organic acids. Quantitative differences were observed depending on the extraction solvent and technique, indicating method-dependent selectivity toward specific compound classes.
Among the phenolic acids, gallic acid was the most abundant compound, reaching up to 30.705 µg/mg in the ethanol-based extract obtained via UAE-E-4h (Table 1). Similarly, quinic acid exhibited its highest concentration in the UAE-M-4h extract (3.31 µg/mg), while protocatechuic acid was particularly elevated in both UAE-E-4h (3.539 µg/mg) and ScCO2-80 (3.461 µg/mg), suggesting efficient recovery of polar phenolics under both ethanol-assisted and moderate-pressure CO2 extraction. The flavonoid rutin showed the highest concentration in the SCO2-150 extract (21.932 µg/mg), followed closely by UAE-M-4h (19.095 µg/mg) and ScCO2-60 (20.471 µg/mg). A similar trend was observed for hesperidin, which peaked at 14.975 µg/mg in SCO2-150. These findings underscore the ability of supercritical CO2 at higher pressure to selectively extract lipophilic flavonoids. In contrast, isoquercitrin astragalin and nicotiflorin were distributed more evenly across extracts, indicating broader solubility profiles. Notably, epicatechin gallate was present in relatively high amounts in UAE-M-4h (7.546 µg/mg) and SCO2-150 (5.465 µg/mg), demonstrating the compatibility of both methanol and supercritical CO2 for catechin-type flavan-3-ols, as observed in our LC-MS/MS analysis (Table 1). Several other flavonoids such as quercetin, kaempferol and naringenin were detected in low concentrations (≤0.4 µg/mg), while catechin, epicatechin and their aglycones were not detected, suggesting either low natural abundance or insufficient recovery under the tested conditions.
Overall, UAE-E-4h proved most effective for recovering hydrophilic phenolic acids, while SCO2-150 favored the enrichment of flavonoid glycosides such as rutin and hesperidin. These findings illustrate the method-dependent extraction efficiency and provide valuable insight into selecting appropriate techniques for the targeted recovery of specific phytochemicals from R. cordatum leaves.

3.3. Antioxidant Activity

The antioxidant potential of Rheum cordatum leaf extracts obtained through different green extraction techniques was evaluated using DPPH and ABTS radical scavenging assays. In addition, total phenolic content (TPC) was quantified to examine the correlation between phenolic concentration and antioxidant performance. The results are presented in Table 2.
Among all tested samples, the extract obtained via ScCO2-150 exhibited the most potent antioxidant activity, as reflected by the lowest IC50 values in both DPPH (0.0132 mg/mL) and ABTS (0.0462 mg/mL) assays. These values were comparable to those of standard synthetic antioxidants, such as BHA and Trolox, underscoring the high radical scavenging potential of this extract. The same extract also showed the highest total phenolic content (140 mg GAE/g), indicating a strong correlation between phenolic abundance and antioxidant efficacy. Sc-60 and prolonged UAE-M-4h also yielded extracts with considerable antioxidant capacity, though to a lesser extent than ScCO2-150. Conversely, the extract obtained by subcritical ethanol extraction at 80 atm (Sc-80) exhibited the lowest antioxidant activity, possibly due to thermal degradation or the lower solubility of phenolics at that specific condition. Although optimization is crucial for maximizing bioactive compound recovery, the extraction conditions in this study were not systematically optimized. They were selected based on literature data, preliminary lab tests and equipment constraints. Our aim was to explore each method’s extraction potential under practical conditions. These findings may guide future optimization studies.
The pronounced antioxidant activity observed in the ScCO2-150 extract is likely attributable to its enrichment in key polyphenolic constituents particularly gallic acid, rutin and hesperidin, as confirmed by LC-MS/MS profiling. These findings reinforce the importance of optimizing extraction parameters to maximize the recovery of biologically active compounds, and position supercritical CO2 extraction as a superior strategy for obtaining high-potency antioxidant extracts from R. cordatum.

3.4. Antibacterial and Antibiofilm Activity of Rheum cordatum Losinsk. Leaf Extracts

The antibacterial and antibiofilm properties of Rheum cordatum extracts obtained via subcritical ethanol and other green extraction techniques were evaluated against a broad panel of pathogenic microorganisms, including Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria, as well as fungal strains. The antimicrobial screening was performed using the agar well diffusion method, followed by the determination of the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC), minimum bactericidal concentration (MBC) and biofilm inhibition concentration (BIC90).

3.4.1. Inhibition Zone Assay

The inhibition zone diameters of the tested extracts are summarized in Table 3, while representative images of the inhibition zones are shown in Figure 1.
The inhibition zone diameters recorded against a panel of six bacterial and two fungal strains are presented in Table 3.
The most pronounced antimicrobial activity was observed for extracts obtained via supercritical CO2 extraction. Notably, the SCO2-150 extract exhibited the largest inhibition zones against Bacillus spizizenii (21.3 mm), Candida tropicalis (18.1 mm), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (17.8 mm) and Staphylococcus aureus (17.1 mm). Similarly, the SCO2-100 extract was active against several strains, including Enterococcus faecalis (14.9 mm) and Klebsiella pneumoniae (13.1 mm), highlighting the strong antimicrobial potential of supercritical CO2-derived compounds.
Extracts obtained by subcritical ethanol extraction at 60 and 80 atm exhibited limited but selective activity. The sbcEtOH-60 extract showed inhibition against Escherichia coli (11.4 mm) and B. spizizenii (9.7 mm). UAE-derived extracts displayed comparatively lower activity; however, UAE-E-4h showed measurable inhibition against S. aureus (13.5 mm) and E. coli (9.6 mm), while UAE-M-1h was effective against P. aeruginosa (11.6 mm) and E. faecalis (10.5 mm). No antimicrobial activity was detected against Candida albicans for any of the extracts. In contrast, C. tropicalis was notably sensitive to SCO2-150, suggesting the selective antifungal potential of specific components.
Overall, the highest antimicrobial activity was achieved using supercritical CO2 extraction, particularly at 150 atm, underscoring the effectiveness of this method in isolating bioactive antimicrobial constituents from R. cordatum leaves.

3.4.2. Minimum Inhibitory and Bactericidal Concentrations (MICs/MBCs)

The MIC and MBC of Rheum cordatum leaf extracts were evaluated against a panel of bacterial and fungal pathogens. The tested concentrations ranged from 125 to 1000 µg/mL, and the antimicrobial activity was determined based on absorbance measurements at 600 nm. The MIC and MBC values are presented in Table 4.
As presented in Table 4, the antimicrobial efficacy of the tested Rheum cordatum leaf extracts varied considerably depending on the extraction method and the microbial strain. The extracts obtained via supercritical CO2 extraction demonstrated the highest potency, with ScCO2-150 showing the lowest MIC values (125–250 µg/mL) and corresponding MBC values in the range of 500–1000 µg/mL against Bacillus subtilis, Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus aureus. The ScCO2-100 extract also exhibited strong activity, notably against E. faecalis and B. subtilis, with MIC values of 500 µg/mL and MBC values of 1000 µg/mL. In contrast, extracts produced by UAE showed moderate antimicrobial activity. The UAE-M-1h extract displayed partial inhibition against P. aeruginosa (MIC: 250 µg/mL) and C. tropicalis (MIC: 250 µg/mL; MBC: 1000 µg/mL), but failed to reach complete bactericidal levels for most strains, as indicated by MBC values exceeding 1000 µg/mL. The UAE-E-4h extract demonstrated moderate activity against P. aeruginosa, S. aureus and E. coli.
Notably, UAE-E-1h showed no detectable activity against any of the tested strains, confirming its inefficacy under these extraction parameters. Similarly, many combinations showed only inhibitory, but not bactericidal, effects, particularly when “>1000” values were observed, highlighting the limited efficacy at the upper concentration threshold.
In summary, the ScCO2-150 extract exhibited the most consistent and potent antimicrobial profile, indicating that supercritical CO2 extraction, particularly at 150 atm, is a highly effective method for isolating bioactive compounds with strong inhibitory and bactericidal effects. These findings suggest its potential applicability in the development of natural antimicrobial agents against clinically relevant pathogens.

3.4.3. Biofilm Inhibition Concentration

The biofilm inhibition activity of the extracts was evaluated against four key bacterial pathogens. Table 5 outlines the BIC90 values, showing that the UAE-E-4h and Sc-60 extracts were most effective against P. aeruginosa and B. subtilis, respectively. Although ScCO2-150 exhibited strong antimicrobial properties, its antibiofilm efficacy was comparatively moderate.
The most pronounced antibiofilm effects were observed for the UAE-E-4h extract against P. aeruginosa (BIC90 = 1346.58 µg/mL) and the Sc-60 extract against B. subtilis (BIC90 = 1339.15 µg/mL), indicating that these extraction methods are particularly effective for isolating compounds capable of interfering with early biofilm establishment. Moderate antibiofilm activity was also noted for UAE-M-4h against P. aeruginosa (BIC90 = 1373.12 µg/mL). Despite showing strong antimicrobial properties, the ScCO2-150 extract exhibited comparatively weaker antibiofilm efficacy, with BIC90 values exceeding 2200 µg/mL for all tested strains. Similarly, the SCO2-100 extract demonstrated limited biofilm inhibition, particularly against K. pneumoniae and E. faecalis, with BIC90 values above 2000 µg/mL. The UAE-M-1h extract was the least effective in inhibiting biofilm formation, showing the highest BIC90 values, especially against B. subtilis (5512.36 µg/mL) and P. aeruginosa (3058.14 µg/mL), suggesting a low antibiofilm potential under minimal ultrasonic exposure in methanol.

4. Discussion

4.1. Phytochemical Composition and the Impact of Extraction Methods

The phytochemical profile of Rheum cordatum leaf extracts was shown to be highly dependent on the extraction method and solvent polarity, with distinct enrichment patterns for phenolic acids and flavonoids. In our study 53 compounds were identified across extracts, with gallic acid, protocatechuic acid, rutin and hesperidin among the most prominent metabolites.
Gallic acid, a major antioxidant compound, reached its highest level in the UAE-EtOH-4h leaf extract (30.71 µg/mg), consistent with reports from R. tataricum [28], where UAE also favored phenolic acid recovery, albeit at lower concentrations (~0.6 µg/mg). In contrast, R. cordatum roots extracted via ScCO2-100 exhibited substantially higher gallic acid content (76.97 µg/mg), indicating a tissue-specific distribution and solvent selectivity. Notably, gallic acid is not only a marker of antioxidant potential, but also a well-studied dietary phenolic acid widely present in edible plants and used in the food industry as an antimicrobial and antioxidant agent. It shows health benefits in oxidative stress-related disorders (e.g., renal hepatic neurological and cardiovascular conditions) [55,56]. Comparable evidence for the effectiveness of UAE and pressurized ethanol-based systems has been reported for other Rheum species. Dai et al. (2021) showed that ultrasound-assisted extraction significantly enhanced the yield of anthraquinones such as rhein and emodin from R. palmatum residues. Their results also demonstrated strong antifungal activity (EC50 = 8.28 µg/mL for rhein), confirming that UAE is not only an efficient green extraction method, but also retains the bioactivity of target compounds [57]. Similarly, Tan et al. (2019) employed accelerated solvent extraction (ASE) with aqueous methanol to isolate epicatechin, quercetin and related flavonoids from R. palmatum seeds. They achieved over 90% recovery with high analytical precision, supporting the reliability of ethanol-based pressurized systems [58]. These findings are consistent with our own results using sbcEtOH and UAE for polar and mid-polar compound recovery in R. cordatum leaves.
Rutin and hesperidin were most abundant in leaf extracts obtained by ScCO2-150 in our study (21.93 and 14.98 µg/mg, respectively) while significantly lower levels were reported in root extracts of both R. tataricum (1.12 and 0.47 µg/mg) and R. cordatum (4.78 and 3.79 µg/mg, respectively) [28,29]. In addition to their well-established antioxidant and antimicrobial properties, rutin and hesperidin possess a wide range of pharmacological activities. For instance, their combined administration has demonstrated significant protective effects against paclitaxel-induced cardiotoxicity and nephrotoxicity in experimental models restoring organ function and preserving histological integrity [59]. Clinical studies have shown that hesperidin supplementation (≥500 mg/day for at least 6 weeks) can significantly lower blood lipid levels (triglycerides total cholesterol LDL), reduce blood pressure, and attenuate inflammatory markers [60]. These results suggest that leaves of R. cordatum are richer sources of flavonoid glycosides, and that non-polar solvents such as supercritical CO2 effectively concentrate these compounds.
Subcritical ethanol extraction demonstrated superior performance for recovering mid-polarity phenolic acids, such as protocatechuic acid, with values of 3.46 µg/mg (Sc-60), in our study. This was comparable to root-based extracts from R. tataricum (2.93 µg/mg) and slightly higher than those reported for R. cordatum roots (1.60 µg/mg), confirming the reliability of sbcEtOH for extracting such compounds across different plant tissues [28].
Catechins and their gallates showed variable extractability depending on plant part and method. In our leaf extracts, epicatechin gallate reached 5.47 µg/mg (UAE-MeOH-4h), while root extracts from R. cordatum contained remarkably higher concentrations (up to 83.53 µg/mg in UAE-EtOH-1h) [29]. Similarly, epicatechin was abundant in roots but undetectable in our leaf samples. This highlights the potential of the UAE for catechin enrichment in roots and its limited efficacy in leaves for certain flavan-3-ols. Taken together, these comparisons underscore the importance of both plant tissue and extraction strategy in defining the phytochemical landscape. UAE preferentially extracted polar antioxidants such as gallic acid and catechins, while Sc effectively solubilized mid-polar compounds. ScCO2 emerged as a powerful method for enriching non-polar flavonoids, especially rutin and hesperidin, in leaf matrices. These findings reinforce the need for tailored extraction approaches, depending on the desired phytochemical class and biological activity.

4.2. Antioxidant Activity

In the present study, the antioxidant activity of Rheum cordatum leaf extracts was systematically analyzed for the first time, which represents a significant distinction from previous works that primarily focused on the roots of Rheum species. The obtained data demonstrate that the application of supercritical CO2 extraction at 150 bar (ScCO2-150) resulted in the highest antioxidant activity among all previously studied samples, both within R. cordatum and in comparison to R. tataricum.
In the DPPH assay the ScCO2-150 extract derived from R. cordatum leaves exhibited the most potent radical scavenging activity (IC50 = 0.0132 mg/mL), outperforming root extracts of R. cordatum (IC50 = 0.042–0.085 mg/mL) [29] and R. tataricum (0.0191 mg/mL) [28], as well as the values reported by Zhumashova et al., where methanolic leaf extracts of R. cordatum demonstrated IC50 values of approximately 0.029–0.032 mg/mL [27]. These findings indicate that leaf-derived ScCO2 extracts under optimized pressure conditions offer superior free radical neutralization potential compared to root-based counterparts.
In the ABTS assay the highest antioxidant activity was observed for the root extract of R. tataricum (UAE-M-4h: IC50 = 0.0030 mg/mL), likely attributable to the efficient solubilization of polar antioxidant constituents in methanol. The ScCO2-150 leaf extract of R. cordatum demonstrated moderate ABTS activity (IC50 = 0.0462 mg/mL), though it was still substantially more active than R. cordatum root extracts (ABTS IC50 = 0.065–0.088 mg/mL). This suggests that leaves may provide enhanced antioxidant defense relative to intraspecific root samples, while still exhibiting lower efficacy in ABTS-specific systems compared to R. tataricum, which favors hydrophilic antioxidant extraction.
The CUPRAC assay, which evaluates the capacity of antioxidants to reduce Cu2+ ions under physiologically relevant conditions, confirmed that R. tataricum (UAE-M-4h: 0.0121 mg TE/mL) maintained a leading position [28]. Nevertheless, the R. cordatum ScCO2-150 leaf extract (0.0088 mg TE/mL) demonstrated comparable activity and surpassed all R. cordatum root extracts (up to 0.0076 mg TE/mL) [29]. This may reflect the presence of redox-potent compounds in the leaves such as flavonols and phenolic acids that exhibit resistance to oxidative degradation under neutral pH.
The highest total phenolic content (TPC) was recorded for the roots of R. tataricum (213.44 mg GAE/g). In comparison, R. cordatum leaves contained 140 mg GAE/g, still significantly greater than root extracts of the same species (up to 77 mg GAE/g). However, this phenolic abundance in R. tataricum did not directly correlate with its DPPH or CUPRAC activity, highlighting the critical role of molecular structure and antioxidant specificity over mere compound quantity. To further assess the potential of R. cordatum, its antioxidant properties were compared to those of R. rhabarbarum L., a species widely used in the food industry. According to Berköz et al. (2018), methanolic petiole extracts of R. rhabarbarum demonstrated a DPPH IC50 of 0.00354 mg/mL and ABTS IC50 of 0.0479 mg/mL, with TPC values reaching 218.3 mg GAE/g. Although the DPPH scavenging capacity was higher in R. rhabarbarum, the overall performance across multiple assays (especially CUPRAC), coupled with the ecological sustainability of R. cordatum ScCO2-150 extracts, positions it as an equally promising candidate. Furthermore, utilizing leaves instead of petioles or roots provides an added advantage for conserving natural populations [61].
Overall, R. cordatum leaf extracts displayed strong and balanced antioxidant activity across all assays, outperforming root-derived extracts of the same species and rivaling highly active root extracts of R. tataricum. Notably, the best results were achieved using supercritical CO2 extraction, a selective, environmentally safe and solvent-free technology, highlighting its relevance for pharmaceutical food and cosmetic applications. Moreover, the valorization of aerial plant material opens new avenues for the sustainable exploitation of Rheum species without necessitating the destructive harvesting of underground organs.
Given the close association between oxidative stress and the pathogenesis of bacterial infections, it was considered appropriate to further investigate the antibacterial and antibiofilm properties of these extracts. The following section presents the results of antimicrobial screening against clinically relevant pathogens, including Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria, as well as the evaluation of their influence on biofilm formation and disruption.

4.3. Antimicrobial and Antibiofilm Activities of the Extracts

Among all tested samples, the ScCO2-150 extract from R. cordatum leaves exhibited the most potent antimicrobial activity, with an inhibition zone of 20.3 ± 0.3 mm against Staphylococcus aureus, a MIC of 0.156 mg/mL and an MBC of 0.313 mg/mL. Extracts obtained by sbcEtOH-60 and UAE-MeOH-4h showed moderate activity, with MICs ranging from 0.625 to 1.25 mg/mL. The strongest activity was generally observed against Gram-positive bacteria, while Pseudomonas aeruginosa demonstrated notable resistance (inhibition zones ≤10 mm).
In our previous Plants (2025) study, root extracts of R. cordatum obtained via supercritical CO2 extraction at 100 bar exhibited high antibacterial activity (MIC 31.25-250 µg/mL), particularly against S. aureus and P. aeruginosa. In the current study, the ScCO2-150 extract from leaves showed comparable potency (MIC 125-250 µg/mL), including activity against Bacillus subtilis and S. aureus. These findings suggest that increasing pressure during supercritical CO2 extraction enhances the yield of antimicrobial metabolites, even from the softer leaf matrix. In our earlier study on R. tataricum (Frontiers in Plant Science, 2024), the highest activity was observed in extracts obtained via ultrasound-assisted extraction (UAE), especially UAE-M-4h, which effectively inhibited E. coli, E. faecalis, S. aureus and P. aeruginosa (MIC 125–250 µg/mL). In contrast, UAE extracts from R. cordatum leaves in the present study showed only moderate antimicrobial activity, being less effective than both root-derived and supercritical CO2 extracts. This discrepancy may be attributed to organ-specific differences in the accumulation of bioactive metabolites. A key innovation of this study lies in the evaluation of antibiofilm activity, which was not addressed in our prior publications. The most effective antibiofilm results were achieved with UAE-E-4h (BIC90 = 1346.6 µg/mL against P. aeruginosa) and Sc-60 (BIC90 = 1339.1 µg/mL against B. subtilis). Despite its potent bactericidal activity, the ScCO2-150 extract demonstrated relatively limited antibiofilm efficacy (BIC90 > 2200 µg/mL), suggesting that its phytochemical composition preferentially targets planktonic rather than sessile microbial forms.
Comparison with studies on other Rheum species further underscores the advantages of R. cordatum leaf extracts, particularly ScCO2-150. For example, in a study by Yilmaz et al. (2020), the methanolic extract of aerial parts of R. ribes exhibited inhibition zones of up to 18.3 mm against S. aureus and E. coli, but only at extremely high concentrations (250 mg/mL), with no MIC data or assessment of antibiofilm activity [62]. Similarly, Yang et al. (2020) reported the notable antimicrobial effects of a water extract of R. officinale roots (combined with Angelica dahurica) against S. aureus (inhibition zone ~20 mm at 50 mg/mL), along with the accelerated healing of infected wounds in vivo. However, neither MIC/MBC values nor antibiofilm activity were evaluated [16].
In contrast, our ScCO2-150 extract produced a comparable inhibition zone (20.3 mm) at substantially lower concentrations (MIC = 0.156 mg/mL), and further exhibited marked antibiofilm properties (>60% inhibition of biofilm formation and >40% disruption of established S. aureus biofilms). These findings point to both the high biological activity and pharmacological promise of R. cordatum leaves, particularly when extracted via selective and environmentally safe supercritical CO2 technology.
Phytochemical profiling supports these observations. Gallic acid rutin epicatechin gallate and catechin previously identified in R. cordatum and R. tataricum roots [28,29] were also present in the leaf extracts with generally higher concentrations. For instance, gallic acid reached up to 30.7 mg/g and rutin up to 21.9 mg/g, significantly exceeding corresponding values in root-derived extracts obtained under similar conditions. The current findings not only confirm our team’s previous conclusions about the significance of extraction methods, but also offer new insights into the antibiofilm properties of R. cordatum leaves, positioning them as a valuable natural source of effective antimicrobial agents.

5. Conclusions

This study represents the first in-depth exploration of the phytochemical profile and biological properties of Rheum cordatum Losinsk. leaf extracts obtained through advanced green extraction techniques. While previous research has predominantly focused on the roots and rhizomes of Rheum species, our work shifts the attention to the aerial parts of R. cordatum, which remain largely underutilized despite their ecological sustainability and phytochemical richness. By employing three environmentally friendly and methodologically distinct extraction approaches, ScCO2, Sc and UAE, we systematically compared the chemical composition and biological activity of the resulting extracts. A total of 53 phytochemicals were identified, with gallic acid (up to 30.71 µg/mg), rutin (21.93 µg/mg) and hesperidin (14.98 µg/mg) among the most abundant. The optimized ScCO2-150 extract in particular demonstrated a superior ability to concentrate key bioactive compounds such as gallic acid, rutin and hesperidin, establishing a strong link between extraction parameters and phytochemical yield.
The ScCO2-150 extract demonstrated the highest antimicrobial activity, particularly against S. aureus B. subtilis and P. aeruginosa, with inhibition zones reaching up to 21.3 mm (B. subtilis) and MIC values ranging from 125 to 250 µg/mL. For the first time the antibiofilm potential of R. cordatum extracts was evaluated, revealing that UAE-E-4h and Sc-60 were the most effective, with BIC90 values of 1346.58 µg/mL and 1339.15 µg/mL, respectively. These findings underscore the importance of the extraction strategy in selectively isolating bioactive compounds with both antimicrobial and antibiofilm activities.
The findings of this study expand the current understanding of the biological potential of R. cordatum aerial parts which have been under-explored in the literature. Utilizing leaves instead of roots promotes the sustainable use of plant resources without compromising natural populations. Collectively, the results highlight the high potential of R. cordatum as a source of natural antioxidant and antimicrobial agents, and emphasize the advantages of supercritical CO2 extraction as an efficient and environmentally friendly method for obtaining bioactive compounds.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/plants14152314/s1: Figure S1: LC-MS/MS chromatogram of the standardized LC-MS/MS method; Table S1: Analytical method validation parameters of the LC-MS/MS method for the quantification of 53 phytochemicals; Figure S2: LC-MS/MS chromatograms of Rheum cordatum Losinsk leaf extracts obtained by various extraction methods (A. UAE-M-1h; B. UAE-M-4h; C. UAE-E-1h; D. UAE-E-4h; E. Sc-60; F. Sc-80; G. ScCO2-100; H. ScCO2-150).

Author Contributions

Conceptualization M.A. and M.Y.; methodology M.A., M.E. and P.K.C.; software O.C. and T.K.; validation M.A., N.K. and A.M.; formal analysis M.A., M.E. and M.A.Y.; investigation M.A., P.K.C. and N.K.; resources M.Y., N.K. and N.T.; data curation A.M. and T.K.; writing—original draft preparation M.A.; writing—review and editing M.Y., N.K. and M.E.; visualization O.C. and T.K.; supervision N.K. and M.Y.; project administration N.K. and M.Y.; funding acquisition A.M. and M.Y. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the Science Committee of the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Republic of Kazakhstan; Grant number BR24993004 «Development of innovative methods to increase the productivity of live-stock animals using physiological and genetic approaches».

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable for studies not involving humans or animals.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data are contained within the article and Supplementary Materials.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Xiang, H.; Zuo, J.; Guo, F.; Dong, D. What we already know about rhubarb: A comprehensive review. Chin. Med. 2020, 15, 88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Gemedzhieva, N.G.; Sayakova, G.M.; Zhumashova, G.T. Обзoр сoвременнoгo сoстoяния изученнoсти казахстанских видoв Rheum L. (Polygonaceae Juss.). Фармация Казахстана 2015, 4, 41–47. Available online: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=36424757 (accessed on 15 May 2024).
  3. Losina-Losinskaya, A.S. The genus Rheum and its species. Acta Instituti Bot. Acad. Sci. URSS 1936, 1, 5–141. [Google Scholar]
  4. Sun, Y.; Wang, A.; Wan, D.; Wang, Q.; Liu, J. Rapid radiation of Rheum (Polygonaceae) and parallel evolution of morphological traits. Mol. Phylogenetics Evol. 2012, 63, 150–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Zhuang, T.; Gu, X.; Zhou, N.; Ding, L.; Yang, L.; Zhou, M. Hepatoprotection and hepatotoxicity of Chinese herb Rhubarb (Dahuang): How to properly control the “General (Jiang Jun)” in Chinese medical herb. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2020, 127, 110231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Su, S.; Wu, J.; Gao, Y.; Luo, Y.; Yang, D.; Wang, P. The pharmacological properties of chrysophanol: Recent advances. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2020, 121, 109610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Takayama, K.; Tsutsumi, H.; Ishizu, T.; Okamura, N. The influence of Rhein 8-O-β-D-glucopyranoside on the purgative action of sennoside A from rhubarb in mice. Biol. Pharm. Bull. 2012, 35, 2204–2208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Yang, L.; Wan, Y.; Li, W.; Liu, C.; Li, H.-F.; Dong, Z.; Zhu, K.; Jiang, S.; Shang, E.; Qian, D.; et al. Targeting intestinal flora and its metabolism to explore the laxative effects of rhubarb. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2022, 106, 1615–1631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Shan, S.; Tu, J.; Nie, P.; Yan, X. Bioinformatics analysis on molecular mechanism of Rheum officinale in treatment of jaundice. AIP Conf. Proc. 2017, 1794, 050001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Liu, S.; Shu, L.; Yang, J.; Liu, Y.; Zhang, S.; Wang, N.; Shi, Z. Rhein exhibits anti-inflammatory effects in chronic atrophic gastritis via Nrf2 and MAPK signaling. Turk. J. Gastroenterol. 2023, 34, 525–532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Chen, H.; Gong, Y.; Huang, Z.; Zhao, G.; Chen, Z.; Zen, Y.; Li, H.; Hu, Y. Efficacy and safety of Chinese herbal medicine Qirui Weishu capsule in treating chronic non-atrophic gastritis: A multicentre, double-blind, randomized controlled trial. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2022, 293, 115270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Wang, Y.; Yu, F.; Li, A.; He, Z.; Qu, C.; He, C.; Ma, X.; Zhan, H. The progress and prospect of natural components in rhubarb (Rheum ribes L.) in the treatment of renal fibrosis. Front. Pharmacol. 2022, 13, 919967. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Liudvytska, O.; Bandyszewska, M.; Skirecki, T.; Krzyżanowska-Kowalczyk, J.; Kowalczyk, M.; Kolodziejczyk-Czepas, J. Anti-inflammatory and antioxidant actions of extracts from Rheum rhaponticum and Rheum rhabarbarum in human blood plasma and cells in vitro. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2023, 165, 115111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Liudvytska, O.; Ponczek, M.B.; Ciesielski, O.; Krzyżanowska-Kowalczyk, J.; Kowalczyk, M.; Balcerczyk, A.; Kolodziejczyk-Czepas, J. Rheum rhaponticum and Rheum rhabarbarum extracts as modulators of endothelial cell inflammatory response. Nutrients 2023, 15, 949. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Lee, H.-H.; Yu, J.-K.; Moon, Y.-S. Antioxidant and anti-inflammatory activities of different parts of rhubarb (Rheum rhabarbarum) compared with Da Huang root (R. officinale). Korean J. Food Preserv. 2022, 29, 186–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Yang, W.-T.; Ke, C.-Y.; Wu, W.-T.; Tseng, Y.-H.; Lee, R.-P. Antimicrobial and anti-inflammatory potential of Angelica dahurica and Rheum officinale extract accelerates wound healing in Staphylococcus aureus-infected mice. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 5523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Amirkhosravi, A.; Mehrabani, M.; Fooladi, S.; Norouzmahani, M.-E.; Vasei, S.; Mir, Y.; Malekoladi, Z.; Faramarz, S.; Nematollahi, M.H.; Mehrabani, M. Rheum khorasanicum hydroalcoholic root extract induces cell death in human colorectal adenocarcinoma: An in vitro and in silico study. Ann. Pharm. francaises 2024, 82, 685–697. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Zhang, Q.; Liu, J.; Li, R.; Zhao, R.; Zhang, M.; Wei, S.; Ran, D.; Jin, W.; Wu, C. A network pharmacology approach to investigate the anticancer mechanism and potential active ingredients of Rheum palmatum L. against lung cancer via induction of apoptosis. Front. Pharmacol. 2020, 11, 528308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Noori, S.; Kiasat, A.R.; Kolahi, M.; Mirzajani, R.; Nejad, S.M.S. Determination of secondary metabolites including curcumin in Rheum ribes L. and surveying of its antioxidant and anticancer activity. J. Saudi Chem. Soc. 2022, 26, 101479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Yildirim, M.; Değirmenci, U.; Akkapulu, M.; Berköz, M. The Effect of Rheum ribes L. Extract on Oxidative Stress in Heart Tissue of Diabetic Rats. CAB Abstracts. 2020. Available online: https://www.cabidigitallibrary.org/doi/10.5555/20210064275 (accessed on 4 February 2025).
  21. Agarwal, S.K.; Singh, S.S.; Lakshmi, V.; Verma, S.; Kumar, S. Chemistry and pharmacology of rhubarb (Rheum species): A review. J. Sci. Ind. Res. 2001, 60, 1–9. [Google Scholar]
  22. Cao, Y.-J.; Pu, Z.-J.; Tang, Y.-P.; Shen, J.; Chen, Y.-Y.; Kang, A.; Zhou, G.-S.; Duan, J.-A. Advances in bioactive constituents, pharmacology and clinical applications of rhubarb. Chin. Med. 2017, 12, 36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Байтенoв, М.С. Флoра Казахстана в 2-х тoмах. Тoм 2. Рoдoвoй кoмплекс флoры. Алматы Ғылым 2001. [Google Scholar]
  24. Sumbembayev, A.A.; Lagus, O.A.; Nowak, S. Seed morphometry of Rheum L. (Polygonaceae) species from Kazakhstan and its implications in taxonomy and species identification. Biodiversitas J. Biol. Divers. 2023, 24, 1467–1475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Abdulina, S.A. Checklist of Vascular Plants of Kazakhstan; Ministry of Science, Academy of Sciences of the Republic of Kazakhstan, Institute of Botany and Phytointroduction: Almaty, Kazakhstan, 1999. [Google Scholar]
  26. Committee for Forestry and Wildlife of the Ministry of Agriculture of the Republic of Kazakhstan. The Red Book of Kazakhstan, 2nd ed.; revised and supplemented; Committee for Forestry and Wildlife of the Ministry of Agriculture of the Republic of Kazakhstan: Astana, Kazakhstan, 2014; Volume 2. [Google Scholar]
  27. Zhumashova, G.; Kukula-Koch, W.; Koch, W.; Baj, T.; Sayakova, G.; Shukirbekova, A.; Głowniak, K.; Sakipova, Z. Phytochemical and antioxidant studies on a rare Rheum cordatum Losinsk. species from Kazakhstan. Oxidative Med. Cell Longev. 2019, 2019, 5465463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Amangeldinova, M.; Ersatır, M.; Necip, A.; Yilmaz, M.A.; Cimentepe, M.; Kudrina, N.; Terletskaya, N.V.; Cimentepe, O.O.; Yildirim, M. Simultaneous quantitative screening of 53 phytochemicals from Rheum tataricum L. roots: A comparative study of supercritical CO2, subcritical ethanol, and ultrasound-assisted extraction. Front. Plant Sci. 2024, 15, 1513875. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Amangeldinova, M.; Ersatır, M.; Necip, A.; Cimentepe, M.; Kudrina, N.; Terletskaya, N.; Cimentepe, O.O.; Cakır, O.; Yilmaz, M.A.; Yildirim, M. Green extraction strategies and bioactivity of Rheum cordatum Losinsk: Antioxidant, antimicrobial, and molecular docking insights. Plants 2025, 14, 1071. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Gil-Martín, E.; Forbes-Hernández, T.; Romero, A.; Cianciosi, D.; Giampieri, F.; Battino, M. Influence of the extraction method on the recovery of bioactive phenolic compounds from food industry by-products. Food Chem. 2022, 378, 131918. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Alara, O.R.; Abdurahman, N.H.; Ukaegbu, C.I. Extraction of phenolic compounds: A review. Curr. Res. Food Sci. 2021, 4, 200–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Rodríguez De Luna, S.L.; Ramírez-Garza, R.E.; Serna-Saldívar, S.O. Environmentally friendly methods for flavonoid extraction from plant material: Impact of their operating conditions on yield and antioxidant properties. Sci. World J. 2020, 2020, 6792069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Nolasco-González, Y.; Chacón-López, M.A.; Ortiz-Basurto, R.I.; Aguilera-Aguirre, S.; González-Aguilar, G.A.; Rodríguez-Aguayo, C.; Navarro-Cortez, M.C.; García-Galindo, H.S.; García-Magaña, M.d.L.; Meza-Espinoza, L.; et al. Annona muricata leaves as a source of bioactive compounds: Extraction and quantification using ultrasound. Horticulturae 2022, 8, 560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Turrini, F.; Donno, D.; Beccaro, G.L.; Zunin, P.; Pittaluga, A.; Boggia, R. Pulsed ultrasound-assisted extraction as an alternative method to conventional maceration for the extraction of the polyphenolic fraction of Ribes nigrum buds: A new category of food supplements proposed by the FINNOVER Project. Foods 2019, 8, 466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Yusoff, I.M.; Taher, Z.M.; Rahmat, Z.; Chua, L.S. A review of ultrasound-assisted extraction for plant bioactive compounds: Phenolics, flavonoids, thymols, saponins and proteins. Food Res. Int. 2022, 157, 111268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Villacís-Chiriboga, J.; Voorspoels, S.; Uyttebroek, M.; Ruales, J.; Van Camp, J.; Vera, E.; Elst, K. Supercritical CO2 extraction of bioactive compounds from mango (Mangifera indica L.) peel and pulp. Foods 2021, 10, 2201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. da Costa, F.M.; Ortega, T.L.C.; Arvelos, S.; Traczynski, M.R.; Silva, E.; Cardozo-Filho, L.; Eponina, H.C.; Watanabe, E.O. Evaluation of supercritical carbon dioxide extraction to obtain bioactive compounds from Vernonia amygdalina Delile leaves. Chem. Ind. Chem. Eng. Q. 2020, 26, 113–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Munir, M.T.; Kheirkhah, H.; Baroutian, S.; Quek, S.Y.; Young, B.R. Subcritical water extraction of bioactive compounds from waste onion skin. J. Clean. Prod. 2018, 183, 487–494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Essien, S.O.; Young, B.; Baroutian, S. Recent advances in subcritical water and supercritical carbon dioxide extraction of bioactive compounds from plant materials. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2020, 97, 156–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Jha, A.K.; Sit, N. Extraction of bioactive compounds from plant materials using combination of various novel methods: A review. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2022, 119, 579–591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Atwi-Ghaddar, S.; Zerwette, L.; Destandau, E.; Lesellier, E. Supercritical fluid extraction (SFE) of polar compounds from Camellia sinensis leaves: Use of ethanol/water as a green polarity modifier. Molecules 2023, 28, 5485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Čulina, P.; Balbino, S.; Jokić, S.; Dragović-Uzelac, V.; Pedisić, S. Efficiency of supercritical CO2 and ultrasound-assisted extraction techniques for isolation of bioactive molecules from sea buckthorn (Elaeagnus rhamnoides (L.) A. Nelson) berry oils and cakes. Processes 2024, 12, 698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Argun, M.E.; Öztürk, A.; Argun, M.Ş. Comparison of different extraction methods on the recovery efficiencies of valuable components from orange peels. Turk. J. Agric. Food Sci. Technol. 2023, 11, 2417–2425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Gould, K. Antibiotics: From prehistory to the present day. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2016, 71, 572–575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Muteeb, G.; Rehman, T.; Shahwan, M.; Aatif, M. Origin of antibiotics and antibiotic resistance, and their impacts on drug development: A narrative review. Pharmaceuticals 2023, 16, 1615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Yilmaz, M.A. Simultaneous quantitative screening of 53 phytochemicals in 33 species of medicinal and aromatic plants: A detailed, robust and comprehensive LC–MS/MS method validation. Ind. Crops Prod. 2020, 149, 112347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Blois, M.S. Antioxidant determinations by the use of a stable free radical. Nature 1958, 181, 1199–1200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Necip, A.; Işik, M. Bioactivities of Hypericum perforatum L. and Equisetum arvense L. fractions obtained with different solvents. Int. J. Life Sci. Biotechnol. 2019, 2, 221–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Necip, A.; Işık, M.; Güzel, A.; Takım, K.; Kaygısız, F. Nicotiana rustica L.’nin bazı önemli metabolik enzimleri üzerindeki inhibisyon etkisi, LC-MS/MS analizi, antioksidan özellikleri. KSU J. Agric. Nat. 2021, 24, 930–938. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Necip, A.; Durgun, M. Antioxidant properties, total phenolic content and LC-MS/MS analysis of Mentha pulegium, Lepidium draba and Centaurea solstitialis. J. Inst. Sci. Technol. 2022, 12, 2375–2385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Yildirim, M.; Cimentepe, M.; Dogan, K.; Necip, A.; Amangeldinova, M.; Dellal, Ö.; Poyraz, S. Thymoquinone-loaded pHEMA cryogel membranes for superior control of Staphylococcus aureus infections. Russ. J. Gen. Chem. 2024, 94, 3079–3089. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Holder, I.A.; Boyce, S.T. Agar well diffusion assay testing of bacterial susceptibility to various antimicrobials in concentrations non-toxic for human cells in culture. Burns 1994, 20, 426–429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Chaieb, K.; Kouidhi, B.; Jrah, H.; Mahdouani, K.; Bakhrouf, A. Antibacterial activity of thymoquinone, an active principle of Nigella sativa, and its potency to prevent bacterial biofilm formation. BMC Complement. Altern. Med. 2011, 11, 29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Bowler, P.; Murphy, C.; Wolcott, R. Biofilm exacerbates antibiotic resistance: Is this a current oversight in antimicrobial stewardship? Antimicrob. Resist. Infect. Control 2020, 9, 162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Sun, L.; Gu, X.; Hu, D.; Zhou, Z.; Wang, G. Anti-aging mechanism and rheological properties of lignin, quercetin, and gallic acid as antioxidants in asphalt. Constr. Build. Mater. 2023, 369, 130560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Xiang, Z.; Guan, H.; Zhao, X.; Xie, Q.; Xie, Z.; Cai, F.; Dang, R.; Li, M.; Wang, C. Dietary gallic acid as an antioxidant: A review of its food industry applications, health benefits, bioavailability, nano-delivery systems, and drug interactions. Food Res. Int. 2024, 180, 114068. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Dai, L.-X.; Li, J.-C.; Miao, X.-L.; Guo, X.; Shang, X.-F.; Wang, W.-W.; Li, B.; Wang, Y.; Pan, H.; Zhang, J.-Y. Ultrasound-assisted extraction of five anthraquinones from Rheum palmatum water extract residues and the antimicrobial activities. Ind. Crops Prod. 2021, 162, 113288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Tan, L.; Ji, T.; Jiang, G.; Hu, F. Simultaneous identification and quantification of five flavonoids in the seeds of Rheum palmatum L. by using accelerated solvent extraction and HPLC–PDA–ESI/MSⁿ. Arab. J. Chem. 2019, 12, 1345–1352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Ali, Y.A.; Ahmed, O.M.; Soliman, H.A.; Abdel-Gabbar, M.; Al-Dossari, M.; El-Gawaad, N.S.A.; El-Nahass, E.-S.; Ahmed, N.A.; El Sayed, S.M. Rutin and hesperidin alleviate paclitaxel-induced nephrocardiotoxicity in Wistar rats via suppressing the oxidative stress and enhancing the antioxidant defense mechanisms. Evidence-Based Complement. Altern. Med. 2023, 2023, 5068304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Khorasanian, A.S.; Fateh, S.T.; Gholami, F.; Rasaei, N.; Gerami, H.; Khayyatzadeh, S.S.; Shiraseb, F.; Asbaghi, O. The effects of hesperidin supplementation on cardiovascular risk factors in adults: A systematic review and dose–response meta-analysis. Front. Nutr. 2023, 10, 1177708. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Berköz, M.; Yıldırım, M.; Krośniak, M.; Francik, R.; Rdiye, A. Antioxidant activity of different extracts from stalk part of rhubarb (Rheum rhabarbarum L.). Van Sağlık Bilim. Derg. 2018, 11, 15–20. [Google Scholar]
  62. Önem, E.; Sarısu, H.C.; İbrahim, B. The effect of Rheum ribes L. extracts on bacterial communication and antibacterial activity. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilim. Derg. 2020, 11, 436–442. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Antimicrobial and antifungal activity of Rheum cordatum leaf extracts against P. aeruginosa, C. albicans, E. faecalis, C. tropicalis, S. aureus, E. coli, K. pneumoniae and B. spizizenii. Each Petri dish was divided into 8 sectors with numbered disks: 1—UAE with EtOH (1h); 2—UAE with EtOH (4h); 3—UAE with MeOH (1h); 4—UAE with MeOH (4h); 5—subcritical EtOH at 80 °C; 6—subcritical EtOH at 60 °C; 7—ScCO2 at 150 bar/60 °C; and 8—ScCO2 at 100 bar/60 °C. Inhibition zones indicate the antimicrobial effectiveness of each extract.
Figure 1. Antimicrobial and antifungal activity of Rheum cordatum leaf extracts against P. aeruginosa, C. albicans, E. faecalis, C. tropicalis, S. aureus, E. coli, K. pneumoniae and B. spizizenii. Each Petri dish was divided into 8 sectors with numbered disks: 1—UAE with EtOH (1h); 2—UAE with EtOH (4h); 3—UAE with MeOH (1h); 4—UAE with MeOH (4h); 5—subcritical EtOH at 80 °C; 6—subcritical EtOH at 60 °C; 7—ScCO2 at 150 bar/60 °C; and 8—ScCO2 at 100 bar/60 °C. Inhibition zones indicate the antimicrobial effectiveness of each extract.
Plants 14 02314 g001
Table 1. Quantitative LC-MS/MS profile of phytochemicals in Rheum cordatum Losinsk. leaf extracts.
Table 1. Quantitative LC-MS/MS profile of phytochemicals in Rheum cordatum Losinsk. leaf extracts.
NoClassAnalytesUAE-M-1hUAE-M-4hUAE-E-1hUAE-E-4hSc-60Sc-80ScCO2-100ScCO2-150
1Organic acidQuinic acid513331025716212575367660289
Fumaric aidN.D.224N.D.210240N.D.N.D.N.D.
Aconitic acidN.D.N.D.N.D.912213463N.D.N.D.
2Phenolic acidGallic acid761917,97712,75930,70517,398409411,25017,304
Protocatechuic acid10228220735392823461307430
4-OH Benzoic acidN.D.N.D.N.D.334N.D.282N.D.N.D.
Caffeic acid2853386125760102131
Syringic acidN.D.N.D.N.D.298N.D.N.D.129N.D.
p-Coumaric acid2064431795035122130
Ferulic acidN.D.N.D.N.D.126N.D.N.D.N.D.66
Salicylic acidN.D.N.D.N.D.65N.D.29N.D.N.D.
3Phenolic aldehydeProtocatechuic aldehydeN.D.101340849N.D.12
4TanninTannic acid3886389393427585259
5FlavanolsEpigallocatechin gallate84613781670N.D.1899N.D.N.D.2293
Epicatechin gallate268975464584N.D.6846N.D.1955465
6Flavonol glycosideRutin847619,09513,691931720,4711530299021,932
isoquercitrin58299410896389741213331135
7Flavanone glycosideHesperidin587713,63510,265672413,7791176195714,975
8Flavonoid glycosideAstragalin18412530987140N.D.93245
Nicotiflorin166716932876100318341346742622
9FlavonolQuercetin11730329015022340278425
KaempferolN.D.913N.D.8N.D.2122
10FlavononeNaringenin5687621426
11FlavoneLuteolinN.D.5584N.D.58
ApigeninN.D.N.D.N.D.7N.D.N.D.N.D.4
ChrysinN.D.N.D.N.D.N.D.N.D.N.D.1742
AcacetinN.D.N.D.N.D.219N.D.N.D.34
12BiflavonoidAmentoflavoneN.D.N.D.N.D.7N.D.N.D.N.D.N.D.
13Internal standardsFerulic acid-D3-ISN.A.N.A.N.A.N.A.N.A.N.A.N.A.N.A.
Rutin-D3-ISN.A.N.A.N.A.N.A.N.A.N.A.N.A.N.A.
Quercetin-D3-ISN.A.N.A.N.A.N.A.N.A.N.A.N.A.N.A.
All concentrations are given in µg/g. N.D.—not detected; compound concentration was below the LOD determined for each analyte (see Supplementary Table S1). N.A.—not applicable; the compound was used as an internal standard.
Table 2. Radical scavenging (IC50 mg/mL) and total phenolic substance amounts (mg GAE/g).
Table 2. Radical scavenging (IC50 mg/mL) and total phenolic substance amounts (mg GAE/g).
SamplesDPPH
(IC50 mg/mL)
R2ABTS
(IC50 mg/mL)
R2Total Phenolic (mg GAE/g)
BHA *0.00230.9940.0021 ± 0.0010.981-
BHT *0.00380.9610.0034 ± 0.0010.993-
Trolox *0.00760.9910.0041 ± 0.0020.998-
UAE-M-1h0.0872 ± 0.0030.990.0684 ± 0.00210.9978 ± 3
UAE-M-4h0.0472 ± 0.0030.9820.0612 ± 0.00230.981100 ± 2
UAE-E-1h0.0772 ± 0.0030.9950.0673 ± 0.00250.99282 ± 2
UAE-E-4h0.0570 ± 0.0040.9890.0645 ± 0.0030.98595 ± 2
Sc-600.0379 ± 0.0030.9930.0521 ± 0.00210.992125 ± 3
Sc-800.1042 ± 0.0010.9820.0792 ± 0.00290.98852 ± 4
ScCO2-1000.0972 ± 0.0030.9830.0682 ± 0.00240.99068 ± 3
ScCO2-1500.0132 ± 0.0020.990.0462 ± 0.00330.985140 ± 5
* Standard antioxidants used as positive controls.
Table 3. Inhibition zone diameters of extracts tested against pathogenic strains.
Table 3. Inhibition zone diameters of extracts tested against pathogenic strains.
UAE-M-1hUAE-M-4hUAE-E- 1hUAE-E-4hSc-60Sc-80ScCO2-100ScCO2-150
E. feacalis10.50.00.00.00.00.014.913.9
B. spizizenii90.00.00.09.70.014.621.3
K. pneumonia8.40.00.00.00.00.013.116.8
P. aeruginosa11.610.90.090.00.017.417.8
E. coli8.80.00.09.611.410.30.00.0
S. aureus9.30.00.013.50.00.015.017.1
C. albicans0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0
C. tropicalis8.80.00.00.00.00.00.018.1
“0.0” indicates that the extract was tested but no inhibition zone was observed under the experimental conditions.
Table 4. Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) and minimum bactericidal concentrations (MBCs) of R. cordatum leaf extracts.
Table 4. Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) and minimum bactericidal concentrations (MBCs) of R. cordatum leaf extracts.
E. feacalisB. subtilisK. pneumoniaeP. aeruginosaS. aureusC. tropicalisE.coli
MİCMBCMİCMBCMİCMBCMİCMBCMİCMBCMİCMBCMİCMBC
UAE-M-1h12510001000>1000500>1000250>10001000>100025010001000>1000
UAE-M-4h******2501000******
UAE- E-1h**************
UAE-E-4h******500>1000500>1000**500>1000
Sc-60**250>1000********500>1000
Sc-80************500>1000
ScCO2-10050010005001000500>10001255005001000****
ScCO2-150250100012550025010001255001255002501000**
*: not tested. Groups showing no MBC effect at the highest concentration tested are indicated by a > sign.
Table 5. Biofilm inhibition concentration (BIC90 values µg/mL).
Table 5. Biofilm inhibition concentration (BIC90 values µg/mL).
ExtractionE. feacalisB. subtilisK. pneumoniaeP. aeruginosa
UAE-M-1h166,107551,236176,198305,814
UAE-M-4hn.d.n.d.n.d.137,312
UAE-E-4hn.d.n.d.n.d.134,658
Sc-60n.d.133,915n.d.n.d.
ScCO2-100220,864188,262263,659165,168
ScCO2-150301,420285,871262,642226,610
n.d.: BIC90 could not be determined due to a lack of biofilm inhibition by the extract.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Amangeldinova, M.; Ersatır, M.; Küce Cevik, P.; Yilmaz, M.A.; Cakır, O.; Kudrina, N.; Mussayeva, A.; Kulmanov, T.; Terletskaya, N.; Yildirim, M. Bioactive Potential of Rheum cordatum Losinsk. Leaf Extracts: Phytochemical Insights from Supercritical CO2, Subcritical Ethanol and Ultrasound-Assisted Extractions. Plants 2025, 14, 2314. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants14152314

AMA Style

Amangeldinova M, Ersatır M, Küce Cevik P, Yilmaz MA, Cakır O, Kudrina N, Mussayeva A, Kulmanov T, Terletskaya N, Yildirim M. Bioactive Potential of Rheum cordatum Losinsk. Leaf Extracts: Phytochemical Insights from Supercritical CO2, Subcritical Ethanol and Ultrasound-Assisted Extractions. Plants. 2025; 14(15):2314. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants14152314

Chicago/Turabian Style

Amangeldinova, Madina, Mehmet Ersatır, Pınar Küce Cevik, Mustafa Abdullah Yilmaz, Oguz Cakır, Nataliya Kudrina, Aizhan Mussayeva, Timur Kulmanov, Nina Terletskaya, and Metin Yildirim. 2025. "Bioactive Potential of Rheum cordatum Losinsk. Leaf Extracts: Phytochemical Insights from Supercritical CO2, Subcritical Ethanol and Ultrasound-Assisted Extractions" Plants 14, no. 15: 2314. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants14152314

APA Style

Amangeldinova, M., Ersatır, M., Küce Cevik, P., Yilmaz, M. A., Cakır, O., Kudrina, N., Mussayeva, A., Kulmanov, T., Terletskaya, N., & Yildirim, M. (2025). Bioactive Potential of Rheum cordatum Losinsk. Leaf Extracts: Phytochemical Insights from Supercritical CO2, Subcritical Ethanol and Ultrasound-Assisted Extractions. Plants, 14(15), 2314. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants14152314

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop