Next Article in Journal
MiR5651, miR170-3p, and miR171a-3p Regulate Cadmium Tolerance by Targeting MSH2 in Arabidopsis thaliana
Previous Article in Journal
Pre-Chilling CGA Application Alleviates Chilling Injury in Tomato by Maintaining Photosynthetic Efficiency and Altering Phenylpropanoid Metabolism
Previous Article in Special Issue
Cultivated St. John’s Wort Flower Heads Accumulate Tocotrienols over Tocopherols, Regardless of the Year of the Plant
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

A Review of Botany, Phytochemistry, and Biological Activities of Fragaria vesca and Fragaria viridis Widespread in Kazakhstan

by
Gayane A. Atazhanova
1,2,
Gulnissa K. Kurmantayeva
1,2,
Yana K. Levaya
1,2,*,
Margarita Yu Ishmuratova
1 and
Marlen K. Smagulov
1
1
Research Park of Biotechnology and Eco-Monitoring, Karaganda Buketov University, Universitetskaya Street, 28, Karaganda 100028, Kazakhstan
2
School of Pharmacy, Karaganda Medical University, Gogol Street, 40, Karaganda 100017, Kazakhstan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Plants 2025, 14(13), 2027; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants14132027
Submission received: 13 May 2025 / Revised: 17 June 2025 / Accepted: 1 July 2025 / Published: 2 July 2025

Abstract

According to current taxonomic consensus, the genus Fragaria L. (family Rosaceae) comprises nine recognized species: Fragaria × ananassa (Duchartre ex Weston) Duchesne ex Rozier, Fragaria bucharica Losinsk., Fragaria viridis subsp. campestris (Steven) Pael., Fragaria chiloensis (L.) Mill., Fragaria moschata Duchesne ex Weston, Fragaria orientalis Losinsk., Fragaria vesca L., Fragaria virginiana Mill., and Fragaria viridis Duchartre. Within the flora of Kazakhstan, two species are of particular significance: F. vesca L. and F. viridis Weston. The genus Fragaria L. is notable for its high content of diverse classes of biologically active compounds, which exhibit a broad spectrum of pharmacological and physiological activities. This review focuses on two Fragaria species native to the flora of Kazakhstan: F. vesca L. and F. viridis Weston. It summarizes recent advances in their botanical characterization, phytochemical profiling, extraction methodologies, and biological activities. Available evidence indicates that the phytochemical composition of extracts obtained from these species is modulated by a range of environmental and biological factors. These include habitat conditions, climate variability, chemotypic diversity, and the specific extraction protocols applied. Particular emphasis is placed on modern extraction techniques and the identification of low-molecular-weight metabolites. These include anthocyanins, volatile organic compounds, flavonoids, and phenolic acids, which contribute significantly to the observed biological effects. The review findings support the relevance of continued research into the potential application of these species as sources for the development of novel therapeutic and prophylactic agents. In addition, they highlight their promise for use in the formulation of biologically active compounds intended for food supplements and cosmetic products.

1. Introduction

Wild plant species that form part of the native flora have long served as important sources of medicinal and vitamin-rich raw materials, both for public use and for the pharmaceutical industry. Amid the growing global interest in natural and environmentally sustainable products, particular attention is being paid to their use in medicine and cosmetology. In this context, the identification and quality assessment of promising regional sources of medicinal plant materials has become increasingly relevant. The determination of phytochemical parameters in plant raw materials offers a scientific foundation for recommending specific species for cultivation and large-scale harvesting. This, in turn, enables the development of novel pharmaceutical and cosmetic products derived from these bioresources. The outcomes of phytochemical research on biologically active compounds may prove useful in both scientific and industrial fields. In addition, they can support the development of practical recommendations for local communities regarding the everyday use of wild and cultivated plant species.
Among the representatives of the genus Fragaria L. (family Rosaceae), particular research interest is directed toward two species: F. vesca L. and F. viridis Weston. Despite their morphological similarities, these species exhibit notable differences in the composition of phenolic compounds, organic acids, and other biologically active constituents [1]. The plants sources/their phytochemicals have been known already from ancient traditional medicine for their multiple effects, especially the bioactive compounds being used for their healing activity [2].
Representatives of the genus Fragaria, which are believed to have originated during the Tertiary period, are distributed across Eurasia and America. The diploid species, such as F. vesca, are considered among the most ancient representatives of the genus [3]. Eastern Asia is regarded as the primary center of origin and early diversification of Fragaria. It is in this region that both diploid and the earliest tetraploid species are thought to have emerged [4]. Subsequently, the genus Fragaria underwent extensive dispersal, expanding its range into Europe; America; and the mountainous regions of the tropics and Eurasia, including the Himalayas and Japan. In ancient Rus, F. vesca was harvested from the wild and used both as a food source and for medicinal purposes [5]. The natural range of F. viridis extends farther eastward, encompassing Central Asia and Siberia. Historically, it did not achieve the same wide distribution as F. vesca, although it was known to and used by humans at an earlier stage. Over time, both species began to be cultivated. This process led to the development of numerous hybrid cultivars [6].
Plants of the genus Fragaria are widely used in both conventional and traditional medicine as sources of medicinal and vitamin-rich raw materials [7]. Fresh berries, rich in vitamin C, are considered a valuable dietary remedy for liver, kidney, and heart diseases [8]. They are also prescribed in large quantities to weakened patients as a general tonic, as well as for the treatment of inflammatory conditions of the stomach and bile ducts, and to normalize intestinal function [9]. Infusions made from the fruits and leaves of Fragaria species are used as diuretics in the treatment of gout, urolithiasis, cholelithiasis, hypertension, scurvy, and other forms of vitamin deficiencies, as well as in cases of uterine bleeding [10]. Fresh berries, when consumed in large quantities, have demonstrated effectiveness in the treatment of vascular sclerosis, hypertension, constipation, and diarrhea. In the Republic of Belarus, a medicinal product known as “wild strawberry leaves” has been registered. In the Russian Federation, dietary supplements containing Fragaria are commercially produced. The quality of F. vesca raw material is regulated by the State Pharmacopoeia XIV edition (FS.2.5.0016.15) [11], which sets standards for the content of extractable substances (minimum 25%) and total flavonoids, expressed as rutin (minimum 1%).
The present review focuses on a comparative analysis of the chemical composition and biological activity of these two species growing in the territory of Kazakhstan. A review of the scientific literature shows that the chemical composition of F. vesca has been extensively studied. It is characterized by considerable diversity and variability. In contrast, the available data on the chemical composition of F. viridis leaves remain limited and fragmentary. This highlights a clear lack of in-depth and comprehensive studies on this species. Existing sources only briefly mention the presence of flavonoids, tannins, alkaloids, and vitamin C in the leaves of F. viridis, highlighting the need for further clarification and systematic investigation. The abundance of raw plant material, the presence of wild populations, the high biological productivity, and the potential for cultivation make these Fragaria species promising subjects for further scientific investigation. Moreover, F. vesca and F. viridis are among the most widespread Fragaria species in the flora of Kazakhstan. Their traditional use in phytotherapy further supports the rationale for selecting these species as objects of study. The aim of this review is to summarize and analyze current data on the chemical composition and biological activity of two Fragaria species that are of the greatest fundamental and applied significance. Particular emphasis is placed on their potential applications in the cosmetic, pharmaceutical, and food industries.

2. Methodology

For a comprehensive literature review, published data were analyzed through the following search engine systems: ScienceDirect®, PubMed®, SciFinder®, Web of Science®, Scopus®, and Google Scholar®. Additional information was obtained from academic dissertations, theses, specialized literature in plant sciences, national pharmacopoeias of various countries, and ethnobotanical sources. The data collection process adhered to the guidelines outlined in the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement [12]. During the search process, the following keywords were used: “Fragaria”, “compounds”, “isolation”, “extraction”, and “biological activity”. Previously published reviews provide data on the phytochemical and biological properties of Fragaria species up to 2019, indicating a lack of recent studies conducted over the past five years. In this regard, it is crucial to provide a more comprehensive overview and update the existing information on the chemical composition of Fragaria species. This includes botanical differences, biological properties of isolated extracts, essential oils, and individual compounds, as well as their potential applications in the pharmaceutical, cosmetic, and medical industries.

3. Botany

The genus Fragaria L. belongs to the Rosaceae Juss. family and is represented by the cultivated species F. × ananassa (Duchartre ex Weston) Duchesne ex Rozier, as well as several wild species. Wild species are distributed across Eurasia and America, thriving in a variety of environments from the tundras of Canada and Alaska to the tropics of Eurasia. A small number of high-altitude species have been identified in the Himalayas, India, Japan, and the Kuril Islands. According to P.M. Zukovskij (1964) [13], the genus Fragaria L. is of typical forest and mesophytic origin. According to the Flora of the USSR [14], the genus includes nine species: F. × ananassa (Duchartre ex Weston) Duchesne ex Rozier, F. bucharica Losinsk., F. viridis subsp. campestris (Steven) Pael., F. chiloensis (L.) Mill., F. moschata Duchesne ex Weston, F. orientalis Losinsk., F. vesca L., F. virginiana Mill., and F. viridis Duchartre. For the flora of Kazakhstan [15], two species are reported: F. vesca L. and F. viridis Weston. M.S. Baitenov [16] also lists two species found in Kazakhstan, while the global flora includes approximately 15 species, distributed across Europe, Asia, and America. According to Plants of the World Online (POWO) [17,18], the genus Fragaria comprises 24 species, which are distributed across Eurasia and America. Introduced species are found in South America and Africa (Figure 1).
The genus was first described by Tragus in 1553, who referred to it as fragaris, derived from Latin, meaning “fragrant”. The systematic characterization was provided by Carl Linnaeus in 1753, while the taxonomy of the genus was further elaborated by Duschesne in 1766. According to various sources, the reported number of Fragaria species has ranged from 11 to 100. Currently, 24 species are officially recognized. It is believed that active hybridization processes are occurring between some species in the wild [13]. For instance, F. × ananassa is considered a cultivated hybrid, spontaneously produced through the crossbreeding of F. chiloensis (from Chile) and F. virginiana (from the Atlantic coast of America) [19]. This hybrid is the progenitor of all cultivated Fragaria cultivars. The center of origin of the genus is believed to be in Eastern and Southeastern Asia. From this region, Fragaria species subsequently spread to Europe and the Americas [20].
Members of the genus Fragaria are perennial plants that form rosettes of long-petioled leaves, which are typically compound and trifoliate. From these rosettes, creeping stolons emerge, which root at the nodes and facilitate effective vegetative propagation. These plants produce multi-flowered corymbs with either hermaphroditic or unisexual flowers. The genus includes both cultivated forms, which often revert to a wild state, and wild species that retain their natural characteristics.
An analysis of the morphological data for the two species, whose chemical composition and biological activity were the focus of this study, revealed several differences. The primary differences involve plant size, the shape of leaflets and teeth, the characteristics of inflorescences and flowers, and the presence of hermaphroditic or unisexual flowers, as well as the shape and coloration of petals, sepals, and fruits. All the studied species primarily inhabit forest, meadow, or shrub communities of the mesophytic type.
F. vesca is characterized by light green, thin leaves with more pronounced teeth. The flower stems are long and often extend significantly above the leaves. The berries are elongated, red, with a soft texture and a distinct, strong fragrance. The tendrils of F. vesca are well-developed and play an active role in vegetative reproduction, forming new rosettes. In its natural habitats in Kazakhstan, this species is found on the edges and clearings of island forests, in spruce and fir forests, and in shrub thickets. Its distribution range spans the Akmolinsk, Almaty, East Kazakhstan, North Kazakhstan, and Karaganda regions, as well as the areas surrounding Tarbagatai, the Dzhungarian Alatau, the Chu-Ili Mountains, the Kyrgyz Alatau, Western Tien Shan, and other regions [15].
The flowering period of F. vesca and F. viridis in Kazakhstan occurs from May to June, while fruiting is observed from June to July (Figure 2 and Figure 3).
In F. viridis, the leaves are dark green, dense, with less pronounced teeth. The flower stems are short, and the flowers are often located below the level of the leaves. The berries are more rounded and sometimes remain greenish even when fully ripe. They have a firmer texture and a less pronounced aroma. The tendrils are fewer, and reproduction is predominantly through seeds. F. viridis grows in aspen-birch thickets; on open grassy mountain slopes, forest edges, and clearings; and in meadows and meadow steppes. Its distribution range is smaller than that of F. vesca, but the local population also uses its fruits for consumption in fresh, cooked, and dried forms.

4. Methods for Obtaining Extracts and Essential Oils from Fragaria Species

Plants of the genus Fragaria (Fragaria spp.) represent a valuable source of low-molecular-weight bioactive compounds. These include phenolic constituents, anthocyanins, flavonoids, organic acids, vitamins, and various other phytochemicals. Such metabolites are known to exhibit significant antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, and antimicrobial activities. The selection of an optimal extraction method is critical for the preservation of these compounds. Moreover, it plays a pivotal role in ensuring their effective application across pharmaceutical, food, and cosmetic industries.
Extraction methods for isolating bioactive compounds from Fragaria species can be classified according to several criteria. These include the type of solvent employed, the mode of physical treatment applied to the plant material, and the overall process technology. Conventional techniques encompass maceration, percolation, and Soxhlet extraction. In contrast, modern approaches involve ultrasound-assisted extraction, microwave-assisted extraction, and supercritical fluid extraction. In addition, biotechnological strategies are increasingly utilized. These include enzymatic hydrolysis and the use of cell suspension cultures.
Maceration involves soaking plant material in an appropriate solvent at room temperature or under mild heating. The efficiency of this method is influenced by several parameters, including extraction duration, temperature, and the ratio of plant biomass to solvent volume. Among the key advantages of maceration are its simplicity and low operational costs. For instance, fruits of Fragaria spp. have been extracted using 96% ethanol over a period of 48 h. The resulting extract was subsequently filtered and concentrated using a rotary evaporator at 37 °C until a viscous mass was obtained [21]. However, the principal limitation of maceration lies in the extended processing time required to achieve adequate yields.
In some studies, the maceration process has been conducted over extended durations. For example, extraction at 25 °C without agitation was carried out for a period of two weeks. The solid-to-solvent mass ratio was maintained at 1:10. Upon completion, the solution was filtered using Macherey–Nagel filter paper. The solvent was then evaporated, and the remaining biomass was resuspended in dimethyl sulfoxide to a final concentration of 100 g/L [22].
Modified short-duration protocols have also been developed to enhance process efficiency. In one such approach, dried leaves of F. vesca were extracted using a 50% aqueous ethanol solution at a solid-to-liquid ratio of 1:10 (w/v). The extraction was performed at room temperature under magnetic stirring at 750 rpm for one hour. Following vacuum filtration, ethanol was removed using a rotary evaporator. The remaining aqueous phase was subsequently lyophilized and stored at 22 °C [23].
Since the leaves of F. vesca contain various classes of phenolic compounds, research efforts continue to focus on developing more efficient extraction methods. Additionally, improving analytical techniques for characterizing these bioactive components remains a priority. To evaluate the effects of temperature, extraction time, and solvent-to-sample ratio, both microwave-assisted and pressurized solvent extraction methods have been tested. The highest total phenolic content and strongest radical-scavenging activity were achieved using ultrasound-assisted extraction. This was performed at 150 °C for 5 min, with a solvent-to-biomass ratio of 40:1 (v/w). Microwave-assisted extraction at 80 °C for 5 min was particularly effective for isolating phenolic acids. In contrast, ultrasound-assisted extraction resulted in a higher yield of proanthocyanidins [24].
Other studies investigated the impact of ultrasound extraction duration and solvent composition on the efficiency of proanthocyanidin recovery from Fragaria leaves. The optimal conditions were identified as follows: extraction with a 56% acetone–water mixture, combined with ultrasonic treatment for 50 min in a bath operating at a frequency of 35 kHz. Under these parameters, the maximum yield of proanthocyanidins reached 124.0 mg per 100 g of dry weight [25].
Among the modern high-efficiency extraction techniques, the Dionex™ ASE 350 (Thermo Scientific™, Salt Lake City, UT, USA) accelerated solvent extraction system stands out as a powerful alternative to Soxhlet, ultrasound-assisted, and supercritical fluid extraction methods. This technique relies on the application of elevated pressure and temperature within sealed stainless-steel cells. Such conditions significantly accelerate the recovery of target compounds. For example, extraction of F. × ananassa was carried out using ethanol and water at temperatures of 90 °C and 110 °C, respectively, under a pressure of 10.3 MPa. Conventional maceration was performed in parallel for comparison. The results demonstrated that accelerated solvent extraction reduced the extraction time from several hours to just 5–20 min. It also doubled the extract yield, minimized solvent consumption, and ensured high reproducibility of the results [26].
In addition to extracts, various types of oils are also obtained from Fragaria plants. The extraction method plays a critical role in determining both the composition and quality of these oils. Cold pressing preserves the nutritional and functional properties of the oil. However, it is associated with a relatively low yield up to 15% of the oil remains in the press cake and high susceptibility of the product to oxidation. An alternative approach involves supercritical carbon dioxide extraction. This method is carried out under anaerobic conditions and enables near-complete recovery of lipid components. A comparative study was conducted on F. vesca seed oil obtained via both methods, followed by a detailed compositional and quality assessment [27].
To prepare aqueous extracts from F. vesca leaves, the authors employed two approaches: decoction and infusion. In the decoction method, 1 g of dried plant material was mixed with 50 mL of ultrapure water, boiled for 15 min, then steeped for an additional 20 min before filtration. In the infusion method, the plant material was poured over with water preheated to 95 °C and steeped for 20 min. Both aqueous extracts exhibited notable biological activity and hold promise for use in the development of functional foods and cosmetic formulations [28].
Research showed that extraction conditions significantly influence the structural characteristics of the resulting polyphenol–polysaccharide conjugates. When high temperatures, ultrasound, or microwave irradiation are applied, significant changes occur in the structure of the isolated polysaccharides. These changes happen despite the medium’s consistent acidity. These methods provide higher extraction efficiency and enhanced anticoagulant activity compared to traditional techniques. Additionally, they enable the isolation of compounds with lower molecular weight [29].
The authors proposed the use of membrane ultrafiltration to obtain high-purity dietary fibers composed of polyphenol–polysaccharide conjugates from F. vesca. In one protocol, 250 g of ground plant material was steeped in a 0.1 M NaOH solution for 24 h, followed by extraction at 97 °C for 6 h. The resulting solution was then neutralized, concentrated, and subjected to ultrafiltration. This approach significantly reduced extraction time and the consumption of organic solvents and water, while maintaining high efficiency in recovering the target compounds [30].
Volatile compounds are typically isolated using methods based on the analysis of the vapor phase, including solid-phase microextraction, steam distillation, supercritical fluid extraction, and dynamic headspace techniques [31]. Solid-phase microextraction is the most widely used method for extracting aromatic compounds. It is especially preferred for analyzing fresh fruits without causing their destruction. It is often coupled with gas chromatography and allows for qualitative assessment of volatile substances. Steam distillation, however, is less sensitive to thermolabile compounds, while supercritical fluid extraction offers a gentle approach for extracting terpenes and esters. Dynamic headspace technique is used to capture volatile substances as they transition into the gas phase. It is important to note that methods for analyzing volatile compounds do not provide a complete profile of the plant matrix. Rather, they offer an assessment of the presence of specific volatile components.

5. Volatile Components of Fragaria vesca and Fragaria viridis

Over 20 wild species of Fragaria have been identified, with the most common being the diploid species F. vesca and F. viridis. Studies focusing on the volatile aromatic compounds of Fragaria have revealed that the fruits contain a variety of low-molecular-weight substances responsible for their characteristic aroma. Among these, complex esters, aldehydes, ketones, alcohols, and terpene compounds stand out. The composition and concentration of these compounds can vary significantly depending on the cultivar and the ripeness of the fruit. The presence of specific compounds is influenced by factors such as berry maturity, cultivation conditions, and the storage period and conditions. Based on differences in the composition of aroma-forming compounds, researchers have made numerous attempts to identify characteristic markers. These markers are intended to distinguish not only between Fragaria species but also among individual cultivars. The most commonly encountered volatile components in the two Fragaria species are presented in Table 1.
Volatile compounds in Fragaria are key determinants of its characteristic aroma and flavor profile. For instance, the monoterpenoids linalool (1) and geraniol (2) contribute to the freshness and complexity of the aroma. Lactones impart tropical nuances such as peach and coconut notes, while aldehydes are responsible for fresh and herbaceous undertones. A distinctive feature of the volatile profile of F. vesca fruit is its richness in esters and monoterpenes. These include α-pinene (3), β-myrcene (4), α-terpineol (5), and α-phellandrene (6). Together, they contribute to the pleasant and readily recognizable aroma of F. vesca, which is closely associated with methyl 2-aminobenzoate (7).
Berry aroma is influenced by both genotype and environmental conditions [32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42]. Volatile organic compounds are primarily responsible for aroma and also contribute significantly to the flavor of fresh berries. Although these compounds represent only 0.01% to 0.001% of the fresh fruit weight, they have a profound impact on fruit quality. Approximately 360 volatile compounds have been identified from fresh Fragaria spp. material. These include esters, aldehydes, ketones, alcohols, terpenes, furanones, and sulfur-containing compounds. Among them, esters are the most abundant and diverse class, both qualitatively and quantitatively. A total of 131 different esters have been identified in the aroma profile of Fragaria. Esters impart fruity and floral notes and account for 25% to 90% of the total volatile content in fresh, ripe fruits. Other compound classes such as aldehydes and furanones may comprise up to 50% of the volatile fraction. Alcohols can make up to 35%, though they typically contribute less to aroma perception. Terpenes usually constitute less than 10%, and sulfur compounds less than 2% of volatiles. Despite their low abundance, both classes can significantly influence the overall aroma of Fragaria.
In contrast to cultivated garden varieties, F. vesca is renowned for its intense flavor and aroma. Most wild Fragaria species produce relatively small fruits, yet these accumulate higher levels and a broader spectrum of volatile molecules compared to domesticated cultivars [42]. Due to its rich aromatic profile, F. vesca has attracted significant scientific interest. Methyl anthranilate (7) is recognized as the primary aroma compound in F. vesca. Ketones such as 2-pentanone (8), 2-heptanone (9), and 2-nonanone (10), as well as terpenoids including myrtenal (11), myrtenyl acetate (12), and α-terpineol (5), are found at higher concentrations in wild berries [43].
The high variability of volatile compounds in Fragaria can be attributed to genetic factors, ripening stage, and post-harvest conditions. Compared to cultivated strawberries, F. vesca exhibits a distinctive and more intense flavor profile. Genetic factors have also been shown to influence its aroma characteristics. In a study by Urrutia [44], the genetic basis of aromatic compounds in F. vesca fruit was explored. This species was found to possess a richer and more fruit-forward aroma than that of cultivated varieties. The study utilized a collection of nearly isogenic lines derived from a cross between F. vesca and F. bucharica. This genetic material enabled detailed investigation of variability and qualitative traits in fruit composition. Volatile compounds were analyzed using gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC-MS), which revealed a complex and highly variable volatile profile. A total of 100 compounds were identified, including esters, aldehydes, ketones, alcohols, terpenoids, furans, and lactones. Within this dataset, a subset of key volatiles was identified as major contributors to the characteristic aroma and flavor of F. vesca. Genetic analysis revealed 50 major quantitative trait loci.
To assess aroma quality based on chemical composition, volatile compounds are typically grouped according to their olfactory impact on berry aroma. Among these, esters form one of the principal classes of aroma-active compounds, imparting the characteristic fruity scent to the fruit. According to studies [32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42], esters account for approximately 25% to 90% of the total volatile content in Fragaria. These studies also indicate that nearly all esters identified in Fragaria are saturated. This means that neither the alcohol nor the acid fragments of these molecules contain double bonds. Differences in the composition of volatile esters between wild and cultivated Fragaria species have been reported by Donga et al. [37]. The authors proposed that the ester profile, dominated by acetate esters in F. Vesca and by ethyl hexanoate (13) in F. × ananassa, plays a key role in defining the divergent aromatic patterns of the two species.
Aroma-forming compounds characteristic of Fragaria cultivated in regions such as the United States and China are also present in the volatile profile of Fragaria grown in the Republic of Belarus. These include esters, terpenes, furans, and lactones. In Fragaria cultivated in this region, the volatile fraction includes not only saturated esters but also unsaturated ones. These unsaturated esters contain double bonds in both the alcohol and acid moieties of the ester molecule. Volatile compound analysis revealed a striking relationship between berry pigmentation and ester composition. Fruits harvested from the same plant at the same time but differing in color intensity displayed distinct volatile profiles. Light red berries showed a higher proportion of unsaturated esters, whereas dark red berries were richer in saturated esters. For example, floral-scented compounds such as β-linalool (1) and nerolidol (12) were found in significantly greater concentrations in dark red berries compared to light red ones [31].
Sensory evaluation of F. viridis fruits revealed a pleasant taste and an exceptionally fresh, fruity aroma. Essential oils from the leaves and fruits of F. viridis were obtained via hydrodistillation and subsequently analyzed by GC-MS. In the leaf essential oil, 39 constituents were identified, accounting for 67.3% to 80.7% of the total oil composition. The major compounds included β-linalool (1) at levels up to 8.9%; n-nonanal (14) (0.5–8.6%); nerolidol (12) (2.1–4.8%); α-bisabolol (15) (0.8–6.7%); and phytol (16), whose concentration ranged from 18.4% to 47.4% (Figure 3). Notably, the relative abundance of these components varied depending on the growing conditions. The essential oil extracted from F. viridis fruits contained 34 compounds, which together comprised 42.0% to 70.7% of the total oil content. The dominant constituents included m/p-xylene (17) (2.4–14.0%), isolidene (18) (4.7–8.5%), methyl eugenol (19) (3.3–8.4%), and α-muurolene (20) (6.8–11.3%). Additionally, one unidentified compound was detected, with a concentration ranging from 0% to 25.6%, depending on the environmental conditions [33].
Thus, the aroma of Fragaria results from a complex interplay of the concentrations and ratios of various volatile compounds, which are directly influenced by both genetic factors and cultivation conditions.

6. Phenolic Profile of Fragaria

The value of Fragaria berries is largely attributed to their high content of phytochemical compounds, primarily phenolic substances. Among the richest dietary sources of phenolics, Fragaria ranks ninth, providing approximately 390 mg of total polyphenols per serving. The sustained global increase in Fragaria consumption underscores the promising prospects for its future production and commercialization [4]. Among the low-molecular-weight metabolites present in Fragaria, phenolic compounds represent the most abundant and diverse class. Flavonoids constitute the principal subgroup of phenolics, with anthocyanins being predominant. Other flavonoid subclasses such as flavanols and flavonols contribute to a lesser extent. In addition to flavonoids, Fragaria phenolics also include hydrolyzable tannins, primarily ellagitannins and gallotannins, as well as phenolic acids, including hydroxybenzoic and hydroxycinnamic acids.

6.1. Anthocyanins in Fruits of Fragaria vesca and Fragaria viridis

Anthocyanins, the water-soluble glycosides of anthocyanidins, are widely distributed polyphenolic secondary metabolites belonging to the flavonoid class. These compounds are derivatives of 2-phenylbenzopyran (or 2-phenylchroman) and structurally represent glycosides of flavylium cations-anthocyanidins (Figure 4). The core structure of anthocyanidins consists of a C6–C3–C6 carbon skeleton. It comprises a chromane ring system, substituted at position 2 with a phenyl ring. In this structural framework, the substituted benzene ring directly fused to the chromane is designated as ring A. The phenyl ring attached at position 2 is referred to as ring B, and the heterocyclic chromane ring itself is identified as ring C. A key structural feature distinguishes anthocyanins from other flavonoid subclasses. It is the presence of a formal positive charge on the oxygen atom located within the pyran ring.
Anthocyanins exhibit a broad spectrum of pharmacological activities, as demonstrated in rigorously controlled in vitro and in vivo experiments, as well as in preclinical and clinical studies. These compounds have been shown to enhance ocular trophism and night vision, reduce the risk of cardiovascular diseases, and mitigate vascular complications associated with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Such effects are primarily attributed to their antioxidant capacity, as well as their hypoglycemic and hypolipidemic properties. Additionally, anthocyanin-rich extracts have been reported to exert anti-inflammatory effects, inhibit lipid peroxidation, decrease capillary permeability and fragility, and stabilize cellular membranes.
Anthocyanins are the most well-known and quantitatively significant class of polyphenolic compounds in Fragaria. They are of considerable biomedical interest due to a broad range of health-promoting properties, including antioxidant potential, anticancer activity, anti-inflammatory effects, and antiangiogenic mechanisms of action [45]. The quantitative composition of the anthocyanin profile is primarily determined by the Fragaria genotype. According to the Joint World Health Organization Expert Committee on Food Additives, the acceptable daily intake of anthocyanins for humans has been set at 2.5 mg per kg of body weight. In contrast, Russian nutritional guidelines recommend a daily intake of 50 to 150 mg of anthocyanins to support health and physiological function [46].
More than 25 distinct anthocyanin pigments have been identified in Fragaria spp., yet pelargonidin-3-glucoside (21) consistently emerges as the predominant anthocyanin, regardless of genetic background or environmental conditions [47]. Cyanidin-3-glucoside (22) is also a constant constituent of Fragaria, although it is typically present in lower concentrations. In addition to these principal compounds, several minor anthocyanins have been detected in strawberry fruits, including pelargonidin-3-rutinoside (23) and pelargonidin-3-arabinoside (24). When comparing the average anthocyanin content across different samples, a significantly higher concentration was observed in wild-collected F. vesca fruits compared to cultivated varieties, 132 mg per 100 g1 versus 90 mg per 100 g1, respectively [48].
Anthocyanin accumulation is also influenced by environmental factors, including abiotic stressors and exogenous compounds. This suggests that targeted manipulation of environmental conditions could enhance anthocyanin content in strawberry fruits. Plants grown under field conditions are frequently subjected to multiple stress factors throughout their development. These effects are further exacerbated by abrupt shifts in global climate patterns. For instance, findings reported in [49] demonstrate that water deficit positively affects anthocyanin accumulation in F. vesca berries, but only when ambient temperatures remain moderate, around 20 °C.
The content and composition of anthocyanins vary among different cultivars of F. vesca, yet the predominant anthocyanins typically include pelargonidin 3-O-glucoside (21), cyanidin 3-O-glucoside (22), and pelargonidin 3-O-rutinoside (23). For example, a hydromethanolic extract of wild F. vesca fruits collected in the northeast region of Portugal revealed six anthocyanins: cyanidin 3-O-glucoside (22), pelargonidin 3-O-glucoside (21), peonidin 3-O-glucoside (25), cyanidin 3-O-malonylglucoside (26), pelargonidin 3-O-malonylglucoside (27), and peonidin 3-O-malonylglucoside (28). Among these, pelargonidin 3-O-glucoside (21) was identified as the major anthocyanin (Figure 5). Notably, malonylated derivatives were reported in F. vesca for the first time [50].
Malonylated anthocyanin derivatives were identified in the fruits of two diploid inbred lines of F. vesca f. Semperflorens-Ruegen F7-4 (a red-fruited genotype) and YW5AF7 (a yellow-fruited genotype) using ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography coupled with high-resolution tandem mass spectrometry (UHPLC-HRMS(n)) [51]. In Ruegen F7-4 fruits, malonyl derivatives (26–28) were detected alongside cyanidin 3-O-glucoside (22), peonidin 3-O-glucoside (25), and pelargonidin 3-O-malonylglucoside (27). The authors report that both peonidin 3-O-glucoside (25) and peonidin 3-O-malonylglucoside (28) were first identified in F. vesca var. Ruegen F7-4. In contrast, mature fruits of the YW5AF7 line exclusively contained pelargonidin 3-O-glucoside (21), with no malonylated anthocyanins detected.
The chemical composition of fruit extracts from F. vesca collected in the Campania region of Southern Italy was investigated by a group of Italian researchers. Both wild and cultivated specimens were harvested from geographically distinct locations. The extracts were subjected to liquid chromatography coupled with high-resolution mass spectrometry (LC-ESI-Orbitrap-MS) to enable comprehensive metabolite profiling. A total of nine anthocyanins were detected and structurally characterized in the methanolic extracts of both wild and cultivated strawberries of various origins. These included cyanidin 3-O-glucoside (22), pelargonidin 3-O-glucoside (21), pelargonidin 3-O-rutinoside (23), peonidin 3-O-glucoside (25), cyanidin 3-O-malonylglucoside (26), pelargonidin 3-O-malonylglucoside (27), peonidin 3-O-malonylglucoside (28), delphinidin 3-O-glucoside (29), and delphinidin 3-O-malonylglucoside (30). The relative content of anthocyanins was found to vary depending on the geographic origin of the fruit samples [52].
In strawberry fruits, anthocyanins account for approximately 58.1% to 81.0% of the total phenolic content. Numerous studies showed that the major anthocyanin in strawberries is pelargonidin 3-O-glucoside (21). It accounts for approximately 60% to 95% of the total anthocyanin content. The second most abundant anthocyanin is pelargonidin 3-O-malonylglucoside (27), whose levels may range from 0% to 33.5%, depending on the genotype. The anthocyanin content in strawberries is strongly influenced by the genetic background of the specific cultivar or form. It is well established that anthocyanins are key determinants of fruit coloration [53]. Therefore, visual assessment can serve as a preliminary method for estimating anthocyanin levels in analyzed samples. Anthocyanins are synthesized from their aglycone precursors, anthocyanidins such as pelargonidin, cyanidin, and delphinidin, through conjugation with glycosyl, acyl, and methyl groups in various combinations (Table 2). This structural diversification resulting from such modifications underlies the extensive color variability observed in flowers, fruits, and related plant tissues [54].
In the study conducted by Olennikov et al. [55], the metabolite profile of F. viridis fruits was analyzed at three distinct ripening stages. The characterization was performed using high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) with a photodiode array detector, coupled to electrospray ionization triple quadrupole mass spectrometry (ESI-QqQ-MS). Prior to the main analysis, extraction protocols for fresh fruit samples were systematically optimized. Various solvents, including methanol, ethanol, isopropanol, water, and acetone, were evaluated. In addition, different solvent-to-material ratios, temperature conditions (ranging from 20 °C to 90 °C), and extraction techniques (ultrasound-assisted, microwave-assisted, and water bath extraction) were tested. As a result of this preliminary optimization, the final extraction procedure employed 100% methanol at a solvent-to-material ratio of 1:1. This was followed by a 5 min homogenization step and ultrasonic treatment for 30 min at 45 °C. Fruit samples of F. viridis were collected in the Republic of Sakha (Yakutia) at three distinct stages of ripening. Analysis revealed the presence of both cyanidin and pelargonidin derivatives. Specifically, cyanidin-based anthocyanins included cyanidin 3-O-sophoroside (31), cyanidin 3-O-rutinoside (32), and cyanidin 3-O-glucoside (22). Pelargonidin derivatives comprised pelargonidin 3-O-rutinoside (23) and pelargonidin 3-O-glucoside (33) (Figure 6). Compound identification was based on characteristic ultraviolet irradiation (UV)-visible absorption spectra-ranging from 525 to 535 nm for cyanidins, and from 498 to 505 nm for pelargonidins. Additional confirmation was provided by aglycone fragmentation patterns in mass spectrometry, with m/z 285 for cyanidins and m/z 269 for pelargonidins. Identification was further supported by comparison with authentic reference standards. Notably, this study reports for the first time the detection of p-coumaroyl anthocyanin esters in Fragaria fruits.
In the methanolic extract of F. vesca berries collected in central Portugal, six cyanidin-based anthocyanins (22, 34–38) were identified using HPLC coupled to a LCQ Deca XP MAX mass spectrometer (Thermo Electron, Bremen, Germany) equipped with an ESI source operating in positive ion mode. Quantification of these compounds was performed at an absorbance wavelength of 530 nm. Among the identified anthocyanins, cyanidin 3-O-glucoside (22) was found to be the most abundant, with a concentration of 1945.3 ± 98.5 mg/kg [56].
Thus, anthocyanins in F. vesca and F. viridis represent a major group of polyphenolic compounds. They are responsible for the characteristic red to purple pigmentation of the berries and are known to exhibit significant biological activity. Several anthocyanidin aglycones have been identified in both F. vesca and F. viridis, with cyanidin and pelargonidin derivatives predominating. The principal anthocyanins detected in strawberry fruits include cyanidin 3-O-glucoside; pelargonidin 3-O-glucoside; and, to a lesser extent, delphinidin 3-O-glucoside. Anthocyanin biosynthesis in Fragaria species is regulated by genes associated with the phenylpropanoid pathway. This process is influenced by ripening stage, environmental conditions, light exposure, and stress factors. Peak anthocyanin concentrations are typically observed in fully ripe fruits, as well as in response to UV or mechanical damage. From a pharmacognostic and nutraceutical perspective, Fragaria-derived anthocyanins are of considerable interest as promising compounds for the development of antioxidant and anti-aging therapeutics. Additionally, they may serve as biochemical markers of fruit maturity.
Despite the promising potential of anthocyanins as components in food, cosmetic, and pharmaceutical formulations, their broad industrial application remains limited by several key factors. Effective utilization requires high purity and retention of biological activity throughout production and storage. However, anthocyanins are inherently labile compounds. They are prone to structural degradation, metal ion complexation (with K, Mg, Ca), oxidative reactions, and polymerization. The presence of structurally similar flavonoids further complicates the standardization of plant raw materials. In addition, the economic feasibility of large-scale anthocyanin production must be carefully considered. Therefore, targeted selection of Fragaria species and genotypes with high anthocyanin content is essential for the development of cultivars suitable for industrial cultivation.

6.2. Flavonols in Fragaria vesca and Fragaria viridis

Flavonols represent one of the key classes of flavonoids widely distributed in plants, including strawberries (Fragaria spp.). These compounds exhibit a broad spectrum of biological activities. They are known for their antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, antimicrobial, and vasoprotective properties. Flavonols possess the ability to scavenge free radicals, inhibit lipid peroxidation, and modulate the activity of various enzymes involved in cellular defense mechanisms. Recent evidence also indicates that flavonols may exert neuroprotective effects by supporting cognitive function and lowering the risk of neurodegenerative diseases.
The major flavonols identified in strawberry leaves and fruits exhibit strong antioxidant activity. They play a critical role in protecting plant tissues from oxidative stress. Their concentration can vary significantly depending on species and cultivar, fruit ripening stage, environmental growing conditions, and the extraction methods employed. Due to their bioactive properties, flavonols from Fragaria spp. are of considerable interest in pharmacology and nutraceutical research. They hold significant potential as natural antioxidants. These compounds may contribute to the development of both preventive and therapeutic agents. Such agents could target a range of disorders, including cardiovascular and neurodegenerative diseases.
Quercetin (38) is a major bioactive constituent in Fragaria species and serves as a pharmacologically active ingredient in numerous therapeutic formulations [57]. Among its most significant pharmacological properties are antioxidant, antidiabetic, anticancer, antitumor, anti-inflammatory, antiallergic, antihypertensive, and antidepressant activities. Myricetin (39) and kaempferol (40), along with their glycosylated derivatives, are also prominent flavonols found in Fragaria spp. These compounds exhibit high pharmacological potential and contribute to the overall therapeutic value of the plant matrix [58,59].
The qualitative composition and quantitative determination of flavonols in leaf extracts of F. vesca collected in Croatia were analyzed under optimized extraction conditions using ultrasound-assisted and microwave-assisted methods. Flavonol profiling was performed by UPLC coupled with tandem mass spectrometry (MS-MS). The following flavonols were identified: quercetin (38), myricetin (39), kaempferol (40), isorhamnetin (41), quercetin 3-O-glucoside (42), rutin (43), quercetin-3-glucuronide (44), quercetin-3-rhamnoside (45), quercetin-3-pentoside (46), quercetin-acetyl-hexoside (47), myricetin-3-O-rhamnoside (48), myricetin-3-O-galactoside (49), myricetin-3-O-arabinoside (50), kaempferol-3-rutinoside (51), kaempferol-3-glucuronide (52), kaempferol-3-O-hexoside (53), kaempferol-3-O-pentoside (54), kaempferol-pentosyl-hexoside (55), kaempferol-acetyl-hexoside (56), kaempferol-acetyl-rutinoside (57), isorhamnetin-3-rhamnoside (58), and isorhamnetin-3-hexoside (59) [24]. This study represents the first comprehensive characterization of diverse flavonol derivatives in F. vesca, with eight kaempferol derivatives and nine quercetin derivatives identified. The content of major flavonols, rutin, quercetin, kaempferol, and their glycosylated forms, was substantially higher in ultrasound-assisted extracts compared to those obtained via microwave-assisted extraction.
In contrast, a study by Portuguese researchers, employing HPLC at 280 nm following maceration of a 50% aqueous-ethanol extract of F. vesca (1:10, w/v), identified only four quercetin and kaempferol glycosides. However, their concentrations were reported to be very low [23].
In the fruits of cultivated F. vesca of cultivars Ruegen F7-4 and YW5AF7, only trace amounts of quercetin 3-O-glucoside (42), quercetin-acetyl-hexoside (47), and two kaempferol 3-O-acetyl-hexoside derivatives were identified [51].
In fruits of Italian F. vesca, the following flavonols were detected: quercetin rhamnoside (45), isoquercitrin (60), quercetin glucuronide (44), kaempferol glucuronide (52), and kaempferol coumaroyl hexoside (61). Among these, quercetin glucuronide (44) was found at comparatively high concentrations [52].
In the study conducted by D’Urso et al. [60], bioactive compounds in the leaves of F. vesca collected in Italy were investigated using metabolomics approaches based on liquid chromatography coupled with mass spectrometry. This analytical strategy enabled the detection of a broad spectrum of polyphenolic compounds, including flavonoids, phenolic acids, and tannins. The principal antioxidant constituents were identified as quercetin (38), kaempferol (40), and ellagic acid derivatives. However, precise quantitative data for these individual compounds were not reported.
Bagdonaitea et al. quantified the levels of rutin (43) and quercetin 3-O-glucoside (42) in the fruits and leaves of F. vesca and F. viridis, cultivated under identical conditions in Lithuania, using HPLC. Among the analyzed samples, F. vesca fruits exhibited the highest concentrations: 1.38 ± 0.19 mg/g for (43) and 0.69 ± 0.10 mg/g for (42). F. vesca demonstrated the highest overall content of the targeted phenolic compounds among the species studied. This finding highlights its potential as a valuable source of biologically active substances [61].
In the study carried out by Stoenescu et al. [62], Romanian researchers conducted a quantitative analysis of flavonoid content in various anatomical parts of F. viridis. Phenolic compounds were extracted using 100% methanol. The analysis was performed on an UltiMate 3000 XRS UHPLC system equipped with a UV–VIS diode array detector, with detection set at 278 nm. Rutin (43) was identified as the predominant flavonoid in the inflorescences, with a concentration of 242.36 ± 14.20 mg/100 g. Myricetin (39) was measured at 66.98 ± 2.15 mg/100 g (Figure 7). In the fruits, rutin was present at 7.50 ± 0.03 mg/100 g, whereas myricetin was not detected.
A detailed analysis of flavonols in the fruits of F. viridis at different stages of ripening and during storage was conducted by Yildiz et al. [1]. Using HPLC-PAD-ESI-tQ-MS, flavonols were identified based on their UV spectral profiles, with absorption maxima at 256/268/360 nm for quercetin derivatives and 265/343 nm for kaempferol derivatives. In this study, 34 flavonols were identified in the fruits of F. viridis, including 2 aglycones, quercetin and kaempferol, along with 32 glycosidic derivatives, which included both non-acylated and acylated fragments linked to sugar moieties. The total flavonol content in F. viridis fruits varied during the ripening process, with unripe fruits containing 1.24 mg/g, and mature fruits showing a decrease to 1.01 mg/g. The total content of quercetin (38) and its derivatives ranged from 0.66 to 0.82 mg/g, while kaempferol (40) and its derivatives were present at levels of 0.35 to 0.42 mg/g. During the storage of mature F. viridis fruits, the following changes were observed: at 4 °C (7 days), the rutin (43) content decreased by 16.7% (from 0.24 to 0.20 mg/g). At 20 °C (3 days), a 25% reduction in rutin (43) content was noted (from 0.24 to 0.18 mg/g), accompanied by an increase in quercetin 3-O-glucoside (42) and quercetin 3-O-glucuronide (44) (Figure 8). F. viridis fruits are a rich source of flavonols, particularly quercetin derivatives. The highest concentrations of these compounds were observed in unripe fruits, gradually decreasing as the fruits ripened. Storage at low temperatures helps preserve flavonols, which is crucial for maintaining the antioxidant activity of the fruits [1].
Thus, the leaves of F. vesca represent a rich source of antioxidants and can be considered a promising raw material for the development of natural medicines and functional foods. The flavonols in the leaves of F. vesca are primarily quercetin (38) and kaempferol (40). As for the glycosidic forms of flavonols, researchers from Commonwealth of Independent States countries have reported that the dominant compound in F. vesca leaves is the quercetin glycoside rutin (43). This compound may account for up to 3.2% of the total flavonoid content in the leaves [63,64,65,66,67]. Several international studies report either trace amounts of rutin (43) or none at all. Other quercetin derivatives identified include isoquercetin (60) and quercetin 3-O-glucoside (42).

6.3. Flavan-3-ols and Flavan-3,4-diols in Fragaria vesca and Fragaria viridis

Flavan-3-ols constitute a subclass of flavonoids, encompassing both catechins and proanthocyanidins. These compounds belong specifically to the flavanol subgroup within flavonoids. Structurally, flavan-3-ols are characterized by a three-ring backbone comprising rings A, B, and C. Their activity is modulated by the number and position of hydroxyl groups on these rings. Notably, flavan-3-ols lack an oxo group at the C4 position of the C ring. This feature distinguishes them from flavanones. In addition, they do not possess a double bond between the C2 and C3 positions. In both F. vesca and F. viridis, flavan-3-ols play a pivotal role in antioxidative defense and act as protective secondary metabolites. Key representatives of this class include (+)-catechin (compound 63), (−)-epicatechin (compound 64), and oligomeric proanthocyanidins, primarily in the form of dimers and trimers.
Flavan-3,4-diols represent a distinct subclass of flavanols, commonly referred to as leucoanthocyanidins. These compounds are recognized as biosynthetic precursors of both anthocyanidins and proanthocyanidins. Structurally, they are colorless due to the absence of conjugated double bonds in the chromophore region. Flavan-3,4-diols differ from flavan-3-ols in that they possess two hydroxyl groups located at the C3 and C4 positions of the flavan backbone. This unique configuration confers distinct chemical reactivity. They are inherently unstable and readily undergo oxidative transformation to yield anthocyanidins. Alternatively, they may participate in polymerization reactions, leading to the formation of proanthocyanidins. These compounds are naturally present in Fragaria species, including F. vesca and F. viridis, with the highest concentrations typically observed in immature fruits and foliage.
Leaf material of F. vesca, collected during the summer of 2022 in the Dalmatia region of Croatia, was subjected to ultrasound-assisted cavitation and microwave-assisted extraction techniques. Among the isolated phenolic constituents, (−)-epicatechin (64) was detected at a relatively high concentration of 100.29 ± 2.84 mg per 100 g of dry weight in the ultrasound-assisted extracts. Even more pronounced was the accumulation of procyanidin B1 (65), quantified at 332.26 ± 9.40 mg/100 g under the same extraction conditions. Other identified compounds included epigallocatechin gallate (66), epicatechin gallate (67), a procyanidin trimer (68), and procyanidin B2 (69) (Figure 9). However, these were present only in trace or minor quantities.
In a study D’Urso et al. [52], a total of 39 metabolites were identified in methanolic extracts of F. vesca leaves using LC-ESI-Orbitrap-MS. Among the compounds detected were procyanidin B1 (65), (epi)afzelechin-(epi)catechin dimers (70), procyanidin C1 (71), and procyanidin B2 (69). In the same study, the authors also investigated the metabolite composition of F. vesca leaves preserved via immediate flash-freezing in liquid nitrogen, followed by lyophilization. For extraction, 500 mg of freeze-dried leaf material was treated with 10 mL of 70:30 ethanol–water solution. The mixture was subjected to 15 min of ultrasonic treatment and subsequently centrifuged at 1750 rpm for 15 min. A total of 27 metabolites were identified using LC-ESI/LTQ-Orbitrap-MS. These were predominantly classified as organic acids, flavonoids, catechin derivatives, and catechin oligomers [60].
In ultrasound-assisted leaf extracts of F. viridis, both (+)-catechin hydrate (72) and (−)-epicatechin (64) were detected at concentrations of 311.76 ± 21.35 mg/100 g and 778.11 ± 15.10 mg/100 g dry weight, respectively [62].
In F. vesca, multiple flavan-3-ols were identified, including (+)-catechin (63), B-type proanthocyanidin dimers, B-type trimers, and B-type tetramers. The identification was supported by HRMSn data, UV spectral characteristics, and comparison with literature references [51].
Catechin (63) was isolated from an aqueous extract of F. vesca leaves. The extract was purified using SPE C18 (Supelco, USA). Water was employed as the washing solvent, while methanol was used for elution of the target compound from the column. Final isolation was performed using reversed-phase HPLC coupled with a diode array detector [66].
Catechin derivatives belong to the broader class of flavan-3-ols and were detected both as monomeric units and as structural subunits within proanthocyanidin oligomers. These ranged from dimers to higher-order polymers. In a study conducted by researchers [68], two chromatographic peaks with characteristic galloyl-related UV absorption features were observed. These peaks appeared after acid hydrolysis of F. vesca extracts obtained from plants cultivated in Bolivia.
Water-soluble procyanidins obtained through the fermentation of a tannin-rich extract from F. vesca roots were analyzed using HPLC. Three B-type procyanidin dimers, namely, procyanidins B1, B2, and B5, were identified and quantified. In addition, two flavan-3-ol monomers, (+)-catechin (63) and (−)-epicatechin (64), were detected. These procyanidins demonstrated both antibacterial activity and pronounced angioprotective properties [69].
Furthermore, in a water-methanol extract of F. vesca fruits collected in the northeastern region of Portugal, (+)-catechin (63) was detected in appreciable quantities using HPLC-DAD-MS/ESI analysis [23].
In a recent study [70], the accumulation of polyphenols and the expression of genes involved in their biosynthesis were investigated in fruits of two F. vesca genotypes: the red-fruited “Baron Solemacher” (BS) and the white-fruited “Pineapple Crush” (PC). The analysis encompassed four developmental stages: early green (G1), late green (G2), turning (T), and fully ripe (R). At the ripe stage (R), “Baron Solemacher” exhibited a markedly higher flavan-3-ol content (417 mg/100 g fresh weight) compared to “Pineapple Crush” (210 mg/100 g). These findings highlight distinct metabolic pathway activities between the two genotypes. Catechin, a key flavan-3-ol, is synthesized via the phenylpropanoid–flavonoid biosynthetic pathway. In “Baron Solemacher”, the expression of several structural genes associated with this pathway, PAL1, CHS, F3’H, DFR, ANS, and UFGT1, was significantly upregulated at the ripe stage. Crucially, the transcription factor MYB10, known to regulate the expression of these genes, was also expressed at substantially higher levels in the red-fruited genotype during fruit ripening. In contrast, the white-fruited “Pineapple Crush” showed reduced expression of MYB10 and the aforementioned structural genes, resulting in lower accumulation of flavan-3-ols, including catechin. These data suggest that the differential expression of flavonoid biosynthetic genes directly influences catechin (63) accumulation in F. vesca fruits. This regulation is genotype-dependent and is particularly controlled at the transcriptional level by the MYB10 transcription factor.
Blanch et al. [71] comprehensively examined the impact of high-concentration CO2 treatment on catechin and proanthocyanidin content in F. vesca berries. Postharvest treatment of fruits was conducted under elevated CO2 atmospheres (20% and 40%) at low temperatures to evaluate its effect on flavonoid biosynthesis, including catechins, proanthocyanidins, and anthocyanins. The CO2-treated berries exhibited a notable increase in the levels of proanthocyanidins B1 and B3. Flavonoid profiling was conducted using quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometry (Q-TOF). Quantitative analysis was performed by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) coupled with quadrupole mass spectrometry. The observed increase in catechin concentrations following CO2 treatment may contribute to reduced fungal spoilage. This effect is likely attributable to the well-documented antimicrobial properties of catechins.
Quantitative data on catechin and proanthocyanidin content in F. viridis fruits at different ripening stages have been reported [55]. Fresh fruit samples (100 g) were extracted twice with 100 mL of methanol using an ultrasonic water bath at 50 °C for 30 min per extraction. Compound identification and quantification were performed using HPLC equipped with a photodiode array detector and a triple quadrupole mass spectrometer with ESI. Calibration was conducted using authentic standards, including catechin and proanthocyanidin references. The total content of catechins and proanthocyanidins was found to decrease progressively during fruit maturation. In unripe fruits, the concentration reached 0.29 mg/g fresh weight, decreasing to 0.17 mg/g in semi-ripe fruits and further to 0.09 mg/g in fully ripe fruits.
Catechins and proanthocyanidins are key representatives of the flavanol subclass, playing a central role in antioxidant capacity, flavor development, and defense against biotic stressors in Fragaria species. F. vesca is characterized by a more active phenolic metabolism, particularly under stress conditions such as postharvest CO2 treatment. These stressors induce the accumulation of catechins, including (−)-epicatechin, and B-type proanthocyanidin dimers such as B1 and B3. This reflects a high degree of plasticity in the phenolic profile and suggests that flavonoid biosynthesis in F. vesca can be modulated by external environmental cues. These compounds contribute to defense responses and may enhance resistance to fungal pathogens. In contrast, F. viridis shows a gradual decline in catechin and proanthocyanidin levels (e.g., B2 and C2) during natural ripening. This trend reflects a phenolic shift toward anthocyanin dominance as fruit maturity progresses. Peak levels of catechins and proanthocyanidins in F. viridis are observed during the early developmental stages. These compounds subsequently undergo metabolic transformation or degradation as the fruit matures. This indicates a limited capacity for their sustained accumulation and a lower phenolic adaptability to environmental stimuli, compared to F. vesca.
F. vesca exhibits higher biochemical activity and a greater capacity for adaptive accumulation of catechins and proanthocyanidins. In contrast, F. viridis is characterized by a more stable yet less flexible flavanol profile. Peak concentrations of these compounds in F. viridis are detected at early developmental stages. These interspecific differences reflect distinct modes of metabolic regulation and may be relevant for the development of functional food products and for optimizing fruit storage strategies.

6.4. Phenolic Acids and Their Derivatives in Fragaria vesca and Fragaria viridis

Phenolic acids identified in F. vesca and F. viridis represent a class of biologically active compounds with strong antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, and antimicrobial properties. These metabolites participate in plant defense mechanisms by enhancing resilience to environmental stressors. In addition, they contribute significantly to the flavor, aroma, and nutritional value of both fruit and leaf tissues.
Due to their chemical structure, which includes hydroxyl and carboxyl functional groups, phenolic acids exhibit high chemical reactivity. They actively participate in modulating redox processes within plant and animal cells. These compounds are extensively studied for their potential applications in pharmacology, cosmetology, and the food industry. Their pronounced antioxidant capacity contributes to cellular protection against oxidative stress. Consequently, this reduces the risk of developing chronic diseases.
Of particular interest are hydroxycinnamic and hydroxybenzoic acids identified in the leaves of Fragaria species. These compounds exhibit not only strong antioxidant properties but also notable antimicrobial activity. The composition and concentration of phenolic acids can be influenced by various extraction techniques. This offers promising opportunities for their targeted application in biomedical and technological fields. Phenolic acids represent important phytochemical constituents in both F. vesca and F. viridis. Notably, the wild genotype, F. vesca, tends to accumulate higher levels of these compounds [48].
UPLC/MS-MS was employed to profile the phenolic composition of F. vesca leaf extracts. Several phenolic acids were identified through comparison with authentic standards, including ferulic (73), rosmarinic (74), chlorogenic (75), syringic (76), caffeic (77), and gallic acids (78). Based on previously established fragmentation patterns [72], a number of additional derivatives were tentatively identified (Figure 10). These included 3-p-caffeoylquinic (79), 3,5-di-O-caffeoylquinic (80), 4,5-di-O-caffeoylquinic (81), 4-O-caffeoylquinic (82), 5-O-galloylquinic (83), 3-O-feruloylquinic (84), and 3,5-digalloylquinic acids (85). The presence of 4-O-caffeoylquinic acid (82) confirms earlier findings [60], whereas the remaining derivatives are reported here for the first time [24].
Microwave-assisted extraction at 80 °C increased the total yield of phenolic acids by 40% compared to ultrasound-assisted extraction. Although both methods resulted in extracts dominated by four major acids, p-hydroxybenzoic (86), gallic (78), 5-O-galloylquinic (83), and chlorogenic acid (75), their relative distributions differed depending on the extraction technique. Microwave extraction was 109% more efficient in recovering 4-O-caffeoylquinic acid (82) and showed significantly enhanced extraction of phenolics containing varying numbers of hydroxyl groups. In contrast, ultrasound-assisted extraction favored the recovery of ferulic (73) and syringic (76) acids [24].
Fragaria species typically contain a broad spectrum of low-molecular-weight phenolic metabolites. However, the total phenolic content is generally lower compared to that of other commonly consumed berries, such as blueberries, bilberries, and raspberries. According to a recent review [73], the phenolic content in F. vesca varies within the following ranges (mg per 100 g fresh weight): ellagic acid (87), 9.7–34.5; gallic acid (78), 5.6–44.0; and ferulic acid (73), 1.5–5.1 (Figure 11). Notably, the highest concentration of ellagic acid (87) was observed in green-stage fruits, reaching 351.96 mg/100 g dry weight.
Using HPLC-UV analysis, Stoenescu et al. identified a range of phenolic acids in methanolic extracts obtained via ultrasound-assisted cavitation. The compounds detected included gallic acid (78), neochlorogenic acid (88), chlorogenic acid (75), vanillic acid (89), syringic acid (76), p-coumaric acid (90), ferulic acid (73), sinapic acid (91), salicylic acid (92), and ellagic acid (87). Among these, gallic acid (78) was the most abundant, particularly in the green-stage fruits of F. vesca, where its concentration reached 122.02 mg/100 g dry weight. Syringic acid (76) was found in only one sample type, green leaves and strawberry flowers, at concentrations of 131.01 mg/100 g DW and 29.05 mg/100 g DW, respectively [62].
F. vesca leaves represent a rich and largely underutilized source of biologically active compounds with well-documented health-promoting properties. Their chemical composition has been comprehensively characterized using UPLC–ESI-MS/MS. Among the identified phenolic constituents, neochlorogenic acid (88) was quantified at a concentration of 5.05 mg/g dry weight [74].
Ellagitannins are complex esters of ellagic acid and carbohydrates, most commonly glucose. They are formed by the oxidative coupling of two gallic acid residues, resulting in the creation of a bixicyclohexenone system. Upon hydrolysis, this structure releases ellagic acid. In other words, ellagitannins are tannins that contain ellagic acid in a bound form, which is released upon hydrolysis. These compounds are widely distributed in plants and exhibit pronounced antioxidant and anti-inflammatory activities [75]. It has been found that extracts from the leaves and fruits of F. vesca contain ellagic acid (78) in sufficient amounts compared to the flowers [62].
In a study performed by Vrhovsek et al. [76], agrimoniin (93) was isolated from the fruits of F. vesca, and its structure was determined through spectral data. It was also established that agrimoniin is the primary ellagitannin present in the fruits of F. vesca. Additionally, sanguin H-6 (94) and lambertianin C (95) were identified (Figure 12).
Ellagitannins and other phenolic compounds in the fruits of two diploid inbred lines of F. vesca f. semperflorens—Ruegen F7-4 and YW5AF7, were characterized using UHPLC-HRMS(n). Identified in minor quantities were methylpentoside ellagic acid, methylpentoside methyl ellagic acid, 3-O-acetyl-hexoside methyl ellagic acid, 3-O-pentoside methyl ellagic acid, galloyl-bis-HHDP-glucose, and trigalloylglucose [51].
Gallic acid (78) and ellagic acid (87) were identified from samples of F. vesca collected at altitudes ranging from 2650 to 3300 m above sea level in Bolivia [68].
Various fractions were obtained from the aqueous-ethanolic extract of F. vesca leaves by gel chromatography using a Sephadex LH-20 column (Sigma-Aldrich). Fractionation was achieved through sequential elution with 50% aqueous methanol (2 L), 75% aqueous methanol (2.5 L), and 70% aqueous acetone (1 L). The entire fractionation process was monitored by HPLC, which yielded eight major fractions. The fraction enriched in ellagitannins was profiled at 280 nm. Twelve compounds within this fraction were tentatively identified as ellagitannins using HPLC-PDA-ESI/MSn. Identification was based on their characteristic UV and mass spectral features. All detected compounds exhibited a typical UV absorption profile, with a maximum below 270 nm. Most compounds showed an absorption maximum between 248 and 257 nm, along with a minor shoulder at approximately 280–284 nm. Among the identified compounds were ellagic acid (m/z 87), ellagitannin derivatives, galloyl-HHDP-glucose conjugates, and sanguine H-2, among others [77].
F. vesca has been recognized as a rich source of ellagitannins and ellagic acid glycosides. Milczarek et al. [78] evaluated the influence of fruit comminution methods on the efficiency of ellagitannin extraction. Specifically, they compared homogenization with cryogenic grinding. In addition, two extraction activation strategies were compared: ultrasonic treatment and mechanical shaking. In the second phase of the study, response surface methodology (RSM) was employed to determine the optimal extraction parameters. Experimental variables included acetone concentration (40%, 60%, and 80%), ultrasound duration (5, 10, and 15 min), and temperature (20, 35, and 50 °C). The resulting extracts were quantitatively analyzed by HPLC with a diode-array detector (DAD), and compound identification was confirmed using mass spectrometry. The comminution step was found to be critical for efficient ellagitannin recovery. On average, extracts from cryogenically milled fruits contained approximately 20% less ellagitannins. This amount is lower compared to extracts obtained from homogenized material. According to RSM analysis, acetone concentration was the most significant factor influencing extraction yield. The highest ellagitannin content was observed at 80% acetone, within the tested range of 40–80%. Neither extraction temperature nor ultrasound duration significantly affected extraction efficiency. Agrimoniin (m/z 93) was identified as the major ellagitannin present in F. vesca.
In the fruits of F. viridis, ellagic acid (m/z 87), four ellagic acid glycosides, and eighteen distinct ellagitannins were identified using authentic reference standards [55]. These included lambertianin C (m/z 95), sanguin H-10, sanguin H-6, sanguin H-2, and pedunculagin, as well as structurally characterized compounds such as strictinin, castalagin, and casuarictin. Further analysis via MS/MS confirmed the presence of agrimoniin (m/z 93), the ellagitannin fragarian A, and agrimonic acids A and B. Ellagitannins were found to be the predominant class of secondary metabolites in F. viridis fruits, with total concentrations ranging from 5.97 to 7.54 mg/g fresh weight. Among the quantified compounds, agrimoniin (1.41–2.63 mg/g) and lambertianin C (1.20–1.86 mg/g) were identified as the major constituents.
Thus, a variety of polyphenolic acids were identified in the fruits of both strawberry species, F. vesca and F. viridis, including ellagic acid (87) and gallic acid (78), along with their respective derivatives. Gallic acid (78) was found at lower concentrations compared to ellagic acid (87). Notably, ellagic acid was detected both in its free form and as part of glycosidic and tannin complexes. It contributes substantially to the antioxidant profile of the berries. It is worth noting that F. viridis exhibited a tendency toward slightly higher gallic acid (78) content relative to F. vesca. This difference may be attributed to variations in the biosynthetic pathways between the two species. Nevertheless, ellagic acid (87) and its associated tannins, particularly agrimoniin (93), remain the predominant polyphenolic constituents in both species.

6.5. Other Compounds in Fragaria vesca and Fragaria viridis

The fruits of F. vesca and F. viridis are recognized as valuable sources of ascorbic acid (vitamin C). This compound plays a pivotal role in antioxidant defense. Additionally, it contributes to the stabilization of phenolic compounds within plant tissues [79]. The concentration of ascorbic acid can vary depending on environmental conditions, fruit maturity, and genetic factors. Nonetheless, F. vesca typically exhibits a slightly higher level of this vitamin compared to F. viridis. In addition to ascorbic acid, both species also contain various organic acids, including citric, malic, tartaric, and fumaric acids. Citric acid predominates in the overall acid profile, contributing to the characteristic refreshing flavor of the berries. Malic acid is also present in significant quantities, where it participates in the regulation of acidity and the stabilization of metabolic compounds. The specific ratio of organic acids can serve as a biochemical marker of fruit maturity and cultivar identity. Moreover, it influences both the sensory characteristics and the stability of biologically active compounds, such as polyphenols and vitamins. Taken together, F. vesca and F. viridis exhibit a favorable acid composition that combines the high ascorbic acid content with a diverse spectrum of organic acids. This contributes significantly to their nutritional quality and functional potential.
Beyond polyphenolic and organic acids, the fruits of F. vesca and F. viridis contain a wide array of biologically active compounds. These include flavonoids, anthocyanins, sugars, pectins, amino acids, and aromatic constituents. The berries also contain appreciable levels of soluble sugars, namely, glucose, fructose, and sucrose, which contribute to their characteristic sweetness. Additionally, the fruits are rich in dietary fiber, particularly pectins. These compounds are important not only for digestive health but also for the technological functionality of the raw material in food processing.
A variety of triterpenoids and steroids have also been identified in the fruits and other plant parts of F. vesca and F. viridis. These compounds play essential roles in plant physiological processes and exhibit potential pharmacological activity [27].
Strawberry fruits contain a broad spectrum of mineral elements, including phosphorus (P), calcium (Ca), cobalt (Co), and manganese (Mn). Notably, the iron (Fe) content in strawberry fruits is approximately twice that found in plums. It is also up to 40 times higher than in grapes. This highlights their superior mineral profile in terms of iron content. In addition, the roots and rhizomes of F. vesca and F. viridis have been shown to accumulate up to 9.4% tannins, which may contribute to both the plant’s defense mechanisms and its pharmacological potential. Quantitative data on the elemental composition of strawberry leaf ash reveal significant levels of macroelements (mg/g): potassium (K)—21.9; calcium (Ca)—14.7; magnesium (Mg)—4.5; and iron (Fe)—0.6. Microelements (µg/g) include manganese (Mn)—0.22; copper (Cu)—0.84; zinc (Zn)—0.9; cobalt (Co)—0.22; molybdenum (Mo)—1.28; chromium (Cr)—0.3; aluminum (Al)—0.29; barium (Ba)—0.81; vanadium (V)—0.9; selenium (Se)—11.0; nickel (Ni)—0.18; strontium (Sr)—0.75; lead (Pb)—0.25; iodine (I)—0.09; bromine (Br)—78.3; and boron (B)—143.2. Among the studied species, F. vesca exhibited the highest levels of iron in its mineral composition [80], further reinforcing its nutritional and functional significance.
Polysaccharides have been isolated from the leaves of wild strawberry, with yields ranging from 4.5% to 7.5%. Hydrolysate analysis revealed the presence of galactose, fructose, glucose, arabinose, xylose, and rhamnose, as well as glucuronic and galacturonic acids. The predominant monomeric components of the polysaccharide fraction were identified as glucose (6.2–10.0%), fructose (5.9–9.5%), glucuronic acid (11.3–24.6%), and galacturonic acid (5.7–12.6%). In addition to bound forms, free monosaccharides such as fructose, glucose, sucrose, and trehalose were also detected. Furthermore, the samples contained pectins and hemicelluloses, contributing to the structural and functional matrix of the plant tissues. Amino acid profiling revealed the presence of several proteinogenic amino acids, including aspartic acid, threonine, serine, glutamic acid, glycine, alanine, valine, methionine, leucine, tyrosine, lysine, phenylalanine, histidine, and arginine. The total content of free amino acids was quantified at 14 mg%, while the bound fraction reached 90 mg% [7].
Moreover, two novel compounds: 5-(4-hydroxy-3-methoxyphenethyl)-7-methoxy-2H-chromen-3-ol and 5-(4-hydroxy-3-methoxyphenethyl)-4,7-dimethoxy-2H-chromen-3-ol, were isolated from the ethyl acetate fraction of a methanolic extract derived from the aerial parts of F. vesca collected in Pakistan. Their structures were elucidated using a combination of infrared (IR), UV, and nuclear magnetic resonance (1H-NMR, 13C-NMR), supported by two-dimensional (2D) NMR techniques, including HMBC, HMQC, and COSY [81].

7. Biological Activity of Fragaria vesca and Fragaria viridis and Prospects for Their Application

The fruits and vegetative organs of F. vesca and F. viridis exhibit a broad spectrum of pharmacological activities. This is primarily due to their high content of bioactive compounds. These include polyphenols, triterpenoids, flavonoids, anthocyanins, organic acids, ascorbic acid, and aromatic compounds. Both species demonstrate significant antioxidant properties, which can be attributed to their elevated levels of ellagitannins, ellagic acid, gallic acid, anthocyanins, and ascorbic acid. These compounds effectively neutralize free radicals and protect cells from oxidative stress. Flavonoids and phenolic acids in strawberries possess the ability to inhibit inflammatory mediators. Additionally, the antimicrobial activity of extracts has been established, particularly against Gram-positive bacteria and certain fungi. This suggests their potential application in treating oral and skin inflammations. The antioxidants present in the berries contribute to protecting the liver from toxic damage. They also promote the health of the gastric mucosa. As a result, they help reduce the risk of ulcer formation. These beneficial effects are largely attributed to ellagic acid and flavonoids. Studies indicate that strawberry extracts can reduce blood glucose levels. They also improve insulin sensitivity and lower lipid levels. These effects are primarily attributed to polyphenols, especially quercetin and ellagitannins. Ellagic acid and its derivatives have been shown to inhibit tumor cell proliferation, induce apoptosis, and suppress angiogenesis. These effects have been extensively studied in models of breast, prostate, and colorectal cancers. Phenolic compounds play a crucial role in protecting neurons from oxidative damage. Because of this, both species are promising candidates for preventing age-related neurodegenerative diseases, such as Alzheimer’s disease.
An overview of the main biological effects of F. vesca and F. viridis is provided in Table 3.
Thus, F. vesca and F. viridis represent promising candidates for further investigation. Their high content of biologically active compounds, along with pronounced antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, and antimicrobial properties of the extracts, support their potential therapeutic relevance. These findings provide a strong rationale for continued in-depth study. Moreover, it was established that the LD50 of the ethanolic extract derived from F. vesca leaves exceeds 2000 mg/kg. According to established toxicological classifications, this places the extract in Class V, indicating it is practically non-toxic.
Currently, the development of the aforementioned formulations is underway, primarily based on F. vesca. For instance, a gel containing a 2% F. vesca leaf extract has been formulated as a promising cosmetic product with antioxidant and potential skin-brightening properties. It is suitable for safe and effective topical application. The gel demonstrated high antioxidant activity, comparable to that of ascorbic acid. Specifically, it reduced reactive oxygen species (ROS) levels by 86.2% under UV irradiation and by 61.1% following exposure to H2O2. In vitro studies using HaCaT keratinocyte cell lines confirmed the absence of cytotoxic effects. Furthermore, dermatological assessments conducted on human volunteers revealed good skin tolerance and no signs of irritation. The gel also maintained physicochemical stability under various storage conditions, including fluctuations in temperature and light exposure [23]. In addition, F. vesca fruit juice has been employed in the formulation of a cosmetic face powder. The study results indicated that the product was homogeneous, stable, non-irritating, and safe for use on the skin. The pH remained within the physiologically acceptable range of 4.5 to 6.5. The formulation was also well-received by study participants, indicating high user acceptability [103].
Turkish researchers emphasized the potential of F. vesca as a fruit capable of contributing substantially to regional economic development, particularly through commercial and gastronomic tourism. The incorporation of F. vesca-based dishes and beverages into local food service offerings is expected to generate significant added value for the region’s culinary sector [104]. In addition, commercially available herbal toothpaste containing F. vesca extract demonstrated notable efficacy in reducing bacterial accumulation on dental surfaces. It also promotes overall oral health [105].
Based on the chemical composition and demonstrated biological activity of F. vesca and F. viridis, a wide range of therapeutic and preventive formulations may be developed. These include antioxidant complexes (e.g., capsules, tablets) intended for the prevention of disorders associated with oxidative stress, such as cardiovascular diseases and neurodegenerative conditions. In addition, anti-inflammatory phytopharmaceuticals, such as syrups, tinctures, and drops, may be formulated for the treatment of chronic inflammatory disorders. Extract-based hepatoprotective agents designed to support liver function also represent a promising direction. Furthermore, anti-aging creams and serums exhibiting antioxidant activity could be developed for cosmetic purposes, including the reduction of wrinkles and dull skin tone. Other potential applications include the development of parapharmaceuticals and dietary supplements aimed at enhancing general health and well-being.
In conclusion, F. vesca and F. viridis should be regarded not only as edible plants but also as potential therapeutic agents. Although both species exhibit similar biological effects, F. vesca demonstrates comparatively stronger antioxidant and antimicrobial activities. In contrast, F. viridis may offer greater efficacy in managing diabetes and metabolic syndrome, likely due to differences in specific polyphenol and organic acid content. The results of recent studies confirm that both F. vesca and F. viridis are rich sources of biologically active compounds, including phenolic constituents, flavonoids, and vitamins. The observed antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, and antimicrobial properties of their extracts underscore their potential for application in the pharmaceutical, cosmetic, and functional food industries. Particularly promising is the development of natural phytopreparations aimed at preventing inflammatory conditions and enhancing the body’s antioxidant defense systems. Future research will focus on standardizing extracts, elucidating mechanisms of action, and designing innovative therapeutic and cosmetic products based on these plant species.

Author Contributions

Analysis of chemical composition and biological activity, G.A.A.; analysis of extraction methods, G.K.K.; analysis of chemical composition, manuscript layout, and the revision of literature sources, Y.K.L.; data related to botanical research, M.Y.I.; analysis of biological activity, M.K.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

Review was prepared accordance with grant project of Ministry of Science and Higher Education of Republic of Kazakhstan (Number AP19677164 “Development of new cosmeceutical agents of antioxidant action based on domestic plant raw materials”).

Data Availability Statement

No new data were created or analyzed in this study.

Acknowledgments

The authors gratefully acknowledge the support of the university administration for enabling the completion of this research.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Yildiz, H.; Ercisli, S.; Hegedus, A.; Akbulut, M.; Topdas, E.F.; Aliman, J. Bioactive content and antioxidant characteristics of wild (Fragaria vesca L.) and cultivated strawberry (Fragaria × ananassa Duch.) fruits from Turkey. J. Appl. Bot. Food Qual. 2014, 87, 274–278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Bungau, S.G.; Popa, V.-C. Between Religion and Science: Some Aspects Concerning Illness and Healing in Antiquity. Transylv. Rev. 2015, 26, 3–19. [Google Scholar]
  3. Sun, J.; Sun, R.; Liu, H.; Chang, L.; Li, S.; Zhao, M.; Shennan, C.; Lei, J.; Dong, J.; Zhong, C.; et al. Complete chloroplast genome sequencing of ten wild Fragaria species in China provides evidence for phylogenetic evolution of Fragaria. Genomics 2021, 113, 1170–1179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Fierascu, R.C.; Temocico, G.; Fierascu, I.; Ortan, A.; Babeanu, N.E. Fragaria Genus: Chemical Composition and Biological Activities. Molecules 2020, 25, 498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Chamorro, M.F.; Mazzoni, A.; Lescano, M.N.; Fernandez, A.; Reiner, G.; Langenheim, M.E.; Mattera, G.; Robredo, N.; Garibaldi, L.; Quintero, C. Wild vs. cultivated strawberries: Differential fruit quality traits and antioxidant properties in Fragaria chiloensis and Fragaria × ananassa. Discov. Food 2025, 5, 71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Chambers, A.; Moon, P.; Fu, Y.; Choiseul, J.; Bai, J.; Plotto, A.; Baldwin, E. Yield and Fruit Quality of Sixteen Fragaria vesca Accessions Grown in Southern Florida. HortScience 2018, 53, 1396–1403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Grinevich, V.S.; Korozhan, N.V. Strawberry leaves: Component composition and pharmacological properties. Literature review. Bull. Pharm. 2018, 1, 87–94. [Google Scholar]
  8. Golovinskaia, O.; Wang, C.K. Review of Functional and Pharmacological Activities of Berries. Molecules 2021, 26, 3904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Dryden, G.W.; Song, M.; McClain, C. Polyphenols and gastrointestinal diseases. Curr. Opin. Gastroenterol. 2006, 22, 165–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Ibrahim, D.S.; Abd El-Maksoud, M.A. Effect of strawberry (Fragaria × ananassa) leaf extract on diabetic nephropathy in rats. Int. J. Exp. Pathol. 2015, 96, 87–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Pharmacopoeial Article C.2.5.0016.15 Wild Strawberry Leaves. Available online: https://pharmacopoeia.ru/fs-2-5-0016-15-zemlyaniki-lesnoj-listya/ (accessed on 23 February 2025). (In Russian).
  12. Moher, D.; Shamseer, L.; Clarke, M.; Ghersi, D.; Liberati, A.; Petticrew, M.; Shekelle, P.; Steward, L.A.; PRISMA-P Group. Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 Statement. Syst. Rev. 2015, 4, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Zukovskij, P.M. Cultivated Plants and Their Relatives; Nauka: Moscow, Russia, 1964; p. 790. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
  14. Komarov, V.L. Flora of the USSR; Publishing House of the USSR Academy of Sciences: Moscow, Russia, 1941; Volume 10, pp. 58–67. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
  15. Baytenov, M.S.; Pavlov, N.V. Flora of Kazakhstan; Science: Almaty, Kazakhstan, 1961; Volume 4, pp. 415–417. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
  16. Baytenov, M.S. Generic Complex of Flora. In Flora of Kazakhstan; Gylym: Almaty, Kazakhstan, 2001; p. 114. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
  17. Kew. Plants of the World Online. Genus Fragaria L. Available online: https://powo.science.kew.org/taxon/urn:lsid:ipni.org:names:30014957-2 (accessed on 23 February 2025).
  18. Govaerts, R.; Nic Lughadha, E.; Black, N.; Turner, R.; Paton, A. The World Checklist of Vascular Plants, a Continuously Updated Resource for Exploring Global Plant Diversity. Sci. Data 2021, 8, 215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Liston, A.; Cronn, R.; Ashman, T.L. Fragaria: A genus with deep historical roots and ripe for evolutionary and ecological insights. Am. J. Bot. 2014, 101, 1686–1699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Dubey, A.K. Strawberries. In Origin, Taxonomy and Distribution; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2019; p. 11. [Google Scholar]
  21. Halimatussa’diah, F.N.; Fitriastut, D. Comparison between maceration and microwave extraction techniques of strawberry fruit (fragaria sp) and antioxidant activity test. IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2019, 523, 012024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Křížkovská, B.; Hoang, L.; Brdová, D.; Klementová, K.; Szemerédi, N.; Loučková, A.; Kronusová, O.; Spengler, G.; Kaštánek, P.; Hajšlová, J.; et al. Modulation of the bacterial virulence and resistance by well-known European medicinal herbs. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2023, 312, 116484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Couto, J.; Figueirinha, A.; Batista, M.T.; Paranhos, A.; Nunes, C.; Gonçalves, L.M.; Marto, J.; Fitas, M.; Pinto, P.; Ribeiro, H.M.; et al. Fragaria vesca L. Extract: A Promising Cosmetic Ingredient with Antioxidant Properties. Antioxidants 2020, 9, 154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Terpinc, P.; Dobroslavić, E.; Garofulić, I.E.; Repajić, M.; Cegledi, E.; Dobrinčić, A.; Pedisić, S.; Levaj, B. Maximizing the Recovery of Phenolic Antioxidants from Wild Strawberry (Fragaria vesca) Leaves Using Microwave-Assisted Extraction and Accelerated Solvent Extraction. Processes 2023, 11, 3378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Ivanov, I.; Petkova, N.A.; Pavlov, A.; Denev, P. Optimization of proantocyanidine extraction process from Fragaria vesca L. Leaves. Sci. Bull. Ser. F Biotechnol. 2014, 18, 115–118. [Google Scholar]
  26. Pukalskienė, M.; Pukalskas, A.; Dienaitė, L.; Revinytė, S.; Pereira, C.V.; Matias, A.A.; Venskutonis, P.R. Recovery of Bioactive Compounds from Strawberry (Fragaria × ananassa) Pomace by Conventional and Pressurized Liquid Extraction and Assessment Their Bioactivity in Human Cell Cultures. Foods 2021, 10, 1780. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Grajzer, M.; Wiatrak, B.; Jawień, P.; Marczak, Ł.; Wojakowska, A.; Wiejak, R.; Rój, E.; Grzebieluch, W.; Prescha, A. Evaluation of Recovery Methods for Fragaria vesca L. Oil: Characteristics, Stability and Bioactive Potential. Foods 2023, 12, 1852. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Ivanov, I.; Petkova, N.A.; Pavlov, A.; Denev, P. Polyphenols content and antioxidant activities in infusion and decoction extracts obtained from Fragaria vesca L. leaves. Sci. Bull. Ser. F Biotechnol. 2015, 19, 145–148. [Google Scholar]
  29. Pawlaczyk-Graja, I.; Balicki, S.; Wilk, K.A. Effect of various extraction methods on the structure of polyphenolic-polysaccharide conjugates from Fragaria vesca L. leaf. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2019, 130, 664–674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Pawlaczyk-Graja, I.; Balicki, S.; Ziewiecki, R.; Capek, P.; Matulová, M.; Wilk, K.A. New isolation process for bioactive food fiber from wild strawberry leaf. Biochem. Eng. J. 2020, 161, 107639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Pachytskaya, M.I.; Suboch, V.P. The composition of the volatile components aromatoobrazuyuschih strawberries grown in Belarus. Food Ind. Sci. Technol. 2016, 1, 89–97. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
  32. Urrutia, M.; Meco, V.; Rambla, J.L.; Martín-Pizarro, C.; Pillet, J.; Andrés, J.; Sánchez-Sevilla, J.F.; Granell, A.; Hytönen, T.; Posé, D. Diversity of the volatilome and the fruit size and shape in European woodland strawberry (Fragaria vesca). Plant J. 2023, 116, 1201–1217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Kirillov, V.; Stikhareva, T.; Atazhanova, G.; Makubayeva, A.; Serafimovich, M.; Kabanova, S.; Rakhimzhanov, A.; Adekenov, S. Composition of essential oil of leaves and fruits of green strawberry (Fragaria viridis Weston) growing wild in Northern Kazakhstan. J. Appl. Bot. Food Qual. 2019, 92, 39–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Najda, A.; Dyduch, M. Contents and chemical composition of essential oils from wild strawberry (Fragaria vesca L.). Herba Pol. 2009, 55, 153–162. [Google Scholar]
  35. Kushnarenko, S.V.; Utegenova, G.A.; Özek, G.; Özek, T.; Kotukhov, Y.A.; Danilova, A.N.; Satekov, E.Y. Catalogue of Essential Oils of Plants of East Kazakhstan; Basip. SHYG.: Almaty, Kazakhstan, 2015; p. 72. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
  36. Zheng, S.; Cai, J.; Huang, P.; Wang, Y.; Yang, Z.; Yu, Y. Determination of volatile profiles of woodland strawberry (Fragaria vesca) during fruit maturation by HS-SPME GC-MS. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2023, 103, 7455–7468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Dong, J.; Zhang, Y.; Tang, X.; Jin, W.; Han, Z. Differences in volatile ester composition between Fragaria × ananassa and F. vesca and implications for strawberry aroma patterns. Sci. Hortic. 2013, 150, 47–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Pyysalo, T.; Honkanen, E.J.; Hirvi, T. Volatiles of wild strawberries, Fragaria vesca L., compared to those of cultivated berries, Fragaria .times. ananassa cv Senga Sengana. J. Agric. Food Chem. 1979, 27, 19–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Negri, A.S.; Allegra, D.; Simoni, L.; Rusconi, F.; Tonelli, C.; Espen, L.; Galbiati, M. Comparative analys is of fruit aroma patterns in the domesticated wild strawberries “Profumata di Tortona”(F. moschata) and“Regina delle Valli”(F.vesca). Front. Plant Sci. 2015, 6, 56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Jo, J.S.; Yoo, H.J.; Sim, H.S.; Lee, J.M.; Kim, S.K. Profiling of Flavor Volatiles by SPME-GC-MS in Strawberry Cultivars during Fruit Development and Ripening. Hortic. Sci. Technol. 2024, 42, 326–338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Forney, C.F.; Kalt, W.; Jordan, M.A. The Composition of Strawberry Aroma Is Influenced by Cultivar, Maturity, and Storage. Hortscience 2000, 35, 1022–1026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Honkanen, E.; Hirvi, Y. The Flavor of Berries. In Food Flavours; Morton, I., MacLeod, A., Eds.; Elsevier Scientific Publications: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1982; pp. 125–193. [Google Scholar]
  43. Ulrich, D.; Hoberg, E.; Rapp, A.; Kecke, S. Analysis of strawberry flavour—discrimination of aroma types by quantification of volatile compounds. Z Leb. Unters Forsch 1997, 205, 218–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Urrutia, M.; Rambla, J.L.; Alexiou, K.G.; Granell, A.; Monfort, A. Genetic analysis of the wild strawberry (Fragaria vesca) volatile composition. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2017, 121, 99–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Petruskevicius, A.; Viskelis, J.; Urbonaviciene, D.; Viskelis, P. Anthocyanin Accumulation in Berry Fruits and Their Antimicrobial and Antiviral Properties: An Overview. Horticulturae 2023, 9, 288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Lukyanchuk, I.V.; Zhbanova, E.V. Biologically Active Complex of Strawberry Fruits. Fruit Grow. 2017, 29, 150–158. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
  47. Zhbanova, E.V.; Luk’yanchuk, I.V.; Pak, N.A. Anthocyanins of strawberry berries (review). Mod. Sci. Res. Innov. 2016, 3. Available online: https://web.snauka.ru/issues/2016/03/64910 (accessed on 5 June 2025). (In Russian).
  48. Najda, A.; Dyduch-Siemińska, M.; Dyduch, J.; Gantne, M. Comparative analysis of secondary metabolites contents in Fragaria vesca L. fruits. Ann. Agric. Environ. Med. 2014, 21, 339–343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Rugienius, R.; Bendokas, V.; Siksnianas, T.; Stanys, V.; Sasnauskas, A.; Kazanaviciute, V. Characteristics of Fragaria vesca Yield Parameters and Anthocyanin Accumulation under Water Deficit Stress. Plants 2021, 10, 557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Dias, M.I.; Barros, L.; Morales, P.; Cámara, M.; Alves, M.J.; Oliveira, M.B.; Santos-Buelga, C.; Ferreira, I.C. Wild Fragaria vesca L. fruits: A rich source of bioactive phytochemicals. Food Funct. 2016, 7, 4523–4532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Sun, J.; Liu, X.; Yang, T.; Slovin, J.; Chen, P. Profiling polyphenols of two diploid strawberry (Fragaria vesca) inbred lines using UHPLC-HRMS(n.). Food Chem. 2014, 146, 289–298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. D’Urso, G.; Maldini, M.; Pintore, G.; d’Aquino, L.; Montoro, P.; Pizza, C. Characterisation of Fragaria vesca fruit from Italy following a metabolomics approach through integrated mass spectrometry techniques. LWT 2016, 74, 387–395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Mazza, G.J. Anthocyanins and heart health. Ann. Ist. Super. Sanita 2007, 43, 369–374. [Google Scholar]
  54. Makarevich, A.M.; Shutova, A.G.; Spiridovich, E.V.; Reshetnikov, V.N. Functions and properties of anthocyanins of plant raw materials. Proc. BSU 2010, 4, 1–11. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
  55. Olennikov, D.N.; Vasilieva, A.G.; Chirikova, N.K. Fragaria viridis Fruit Metabolites: Variation of LC-MS Profile and Antioxidant Potential during Ripening and Storage. Pharmaceuticals 2020, 13, 262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Veberic, R.; Slatnar, A.; Bizjak, J.; Stampar, F.; Mikulic-Petkovsek, M. Anthocyanin composition of different wild and cultivated berry species. LWT-Food Sci. Technol. 2015, 60, 509e517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Frent, O.-D.; Stefan, L.; Morgovan, C.M.; Duteanu, N.; Dejeu, I.L.; Marian, E.; Vicas, L.; Manole, F. A Systematic Review: Quercetin—Secondary Metabolite of the Flavonol Class, with Multiple Health Benefits and Low Bioavailability. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25, 12091. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Swathi, N.; Ganta, S. A Recent Review on Dietary Flavonoid-Myricetin. Sys. Rev. Pharm. 2021, 12, 3940–3950. [Google Scholar]
  59. Alrumaihi, F.; Almatroodi, S.A.; Alharbi, H.O.A.; Alwanian, W.M.; Alharbi, F.A.; Almatroudi, A.; Rahmani, A.H. Pharmacological Potential of Kaempferol, a Flavonoid in the Management of Pathogenesis via Modulation of Inflammation and Other Biological Activities. Molecules 2024, 29, 2007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. D’Urso, G.; Pizza, C.; Piacente, S.; Montoro, P. Combination of LC–MS based metabolomics and antioxidant activity for evaluation of bioactive compounds in Fragaria vesca leaves from Italy. J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 2018, 150, 233–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Bagdonaitea, E.; Jakstasb, V.; Raudonisb, R.; Janulis, V. Chlorogenic acid, rutin and hyperoside content in Fragaria vesca, F. viridis and F. moschata in Lithuania. Nat. Prod. Res. 2012, 27, 181–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Stoenescu, A.-M.; Trandafir, I.; Cosmulescu, S. Determination of Phenolic Compounds Using HPLC-UV Method in Wild Fruit Species. Horticulturae 2022, 8, 84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Mudnic, I.; Modun, D.; Brizic, I.; Vukovic, J.; Generalic, I.; Katalinic, V.; Bilusic, T.; Ljubenkov, I.; Boban, M. Cardiovascular effects in vitro of aqueous extract of wild strawberry (Fragaria vesca, L.) leaves. Phytomed. Int. J. Phytother. Phytopharm. 2009, 16, 462–469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Drozdova, I.L. Investigation of Plant Sources of Polysaccharides and Phenolic Compounds: Prospects for Their Practical Use in Pharmacy. Ph.D. Thesis, Kursk State Medical University, Kursk, Russia, 2006; pp. 1–363. (In Russian). [Google Scholar]
  65. Bubenchikova, V.N.; Drozdova, I.L. Phenolic Compounds and Polysaccharides from Fragaria vesca L. Leaves. Rastit. Resur. 2003, 39, 94–98. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
  66. Buřičová, L.; Andjelkovic, M.; Čermáková, A.; Réblová, Z.; Jurček, O.; Kolehmainen, E.; Verhé, R.; Kvasnička, F. Antioxidant capacity and antioxidants of strawberry, blackberry, and raspberry leaves. Czech. J. Food Sci. 2011, 29, 181–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Liberal, J.; Francisco, V.; Costa, G.; Figueirinha, A.; Amaral, M.T.; Marques, C.; Girão, H.; Lopes, M.C.; Cruz, M.T.; Batista, M.T. Bioactivity of Fragaria vesca leaves through inflammation, proteasome and autophagy modulation. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2014, 158, 113–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Peñarrieta, J.M.; Alvarado, J.A.; Bergenståhl, B.; Ákesson, B. Total Antioxidant Capacity and Content of Phenolic Compounds in Wild Strawberries (Fragaria vesca) Collected in Bolivia. Int. J. Fruit Sci. 2009, 9, 344–359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Vennat, B.; Pourrat, A.; Pourrat, H.; Gross, D.; Bastide, P.; Bastide, J. Procyanidins from the Roots of Fragaria vesca: Characterization and Pharmacological Approach. Chem. Pharm. Bull. 1988, 36, 828–833. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Roy, S.; Singh, S.; Archbold, D.D. Developmental Variation in Fruit Polyphenol Content and Related Gene Expression of a Red-Fruited versus a White-Fruited Fragaria vesca Genotype. Horticulturae 2018, 4, 30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Blanch, M.; Alvarez, I.; Sanchez-Ballesta, M.T.; Escribano, M.I.; Merodio, C. Increasing catechin and procyanindin accumulation in high-CO2-treated Fragaria vesca strawberries. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2012, 60, 7489–7496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Garofulić, I.E.; Kruk, V.; Martić, A.; Martić, I.; Zorić, Z.; Pedisić, S.; Dragović, S.; Dragović-Uzelac, V. Evaluation of Polyphenolic Profile and Antioxidant Activity of Pistacia lentiscus L. Leaves and Fruit Extract Obtained by Optimized Microwave-Assisted Extraction. Foods 2020, 9, 1556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Gündeşli, M.A.; Korkmaz, N.; Okatan, V. Polyphenol content and antioxidant capacity of berries: A review. Int. J. Agric. For. Life Sci. 2019, 3, 350–361. [Google Scholar]
  74. Cyboran-Mikołajczyk, S.; Męczarska, K.; Solarska-Ściuk, K.; Ratajczak-Wielgomas, K.; Oszmiański, J.; Jencova, V.; Bonarska-Kujawa, D. Protection of Erythrocytes and Microvascular Endothelial Cells against Oxidative Damage by Fragaria vesca L. and Rubus idaeus L. Leaves Extracts—The Mechanism of Action. Molecules 2022, 27, 5865. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Gasperotti, M.; Masuero, D.; Guella, G.; Palmieri, L.; Martinatti, P.; Pojer, E.; Mattivi, F.; Vrhovsek, U. Evolution of ellagitannin content and profile during fruit ripening in Fragaria spp. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2013, 61, 8597–8607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Vrhovsek, U.; Guella, G.; Gasperotti, M.; Pojer, E.; Zancato, M.; Mattivi, F. Clarifying the Identity of the Main Ellagitannin in the Fruit of the Strawberry, Fragaria vesca and Fragaria ananassa Duch. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2012, 60, 2507–2516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Liberal, J.; Costa, G.; Carmo, A.L.; Vitorino, R.; Marques, C.; Domingues, M.R.; Domingues, P.; Gonc, A.C.; Alves, R.; Sarmento-Ribeiro, A.B.; et al. Chemical characterization and cytotoxic potential of an ellagitannin-enriched fraction from Fragaria vesca leaves. Arab. J. Chem. 2019, 12, 3652–3666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Milczarek, A.; Sójka, M.; Klewicki, R. Selection of Conditions of Ultrasound-Assisted, Three-Step Extraction of Ellagitannins from Selected Berry Fruit of the Rosaceae Family Using the Response Surface Methodology. Food Anal. Methods 2020, 13, 1650–1665. [Google Scholar]
  79. Levaya, Y.K.; Atazhanova, G.A.; Kurmantaeva, G.K. Determination of the quantitative content of ascorbic acid in plants of the flora of Central Kazakhstan. Bull. Karaganada Univ. 2024, 2, 104–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Ivanišová, E.; Horňák, M.; Čech, M.; Harangozo, L’.; Kačániová, M.; Grygorieva, O.; Kowalczewski, P.Ł. Polyphenol Content, Mineral Compounds Composition, Antimicrobial and Antioxidant Activities of Selected Medicinal Herbs from Slovak Republic. Appl. Sci. 2023, 13, 1918. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Sadia, N.; Umar, F.; Ajmal, K.; Haroon, K.; Nasiara, K.; Rizwana, S.; Javid, H.; Abdur, R. Antidepressent Effect of Two New Benzyl Derivatives from Wild Strawberry Fragaria vesca var. nubicola Lindl. ex Hook.f. Front. Pharmacol. 2017, 8, 469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Zugić, A.; Đorđević, S.; Arsić, I.; Marković, G.; Živković, J.; Jovanović, S.; Tadić, V. Antioxidant Activity and Phenolic Compounds in 10 Selected Herbs from Vrujci Spa, Serbia. Ind. Crops Prod. 2014, 52, 519–527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Horčinová Sedláčková, V.; Vergun, O.; Grygorieva, O.; Jankurová, S.; Ferencová, J.; Krivosudská, E. Antioxidant Activity, Polyphenol and Anthocyanin Content of Three Strawberry Species (Fragaria × ananassa Duchesne ex Rozier, Fragaria vesca L., and Fragaria moschata Weston). J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. Food Sci. 2025, 14, e11448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Dias, M.I.; Barros, L.; Oliveira, M.B.P.P.; Santos-Buelga, C.; Ferreira, I.C.F.R. Phenolic profile and antioxidant properties of commercial and wild Fragaria vesca L. roots: A comparison between hydromethanolic and aqueous extracts. Ind. Crops Prod. 2015, 63, 125–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Oldani, M.; Guzzetti, L.; Pioltelli, E.; Sala, D.; Panzeri, D.; Brioschi, M.; Forcella, M. Assessment of the Nutraceutical Properties of Wild Strawberry (Fragaria vesca L.) Extracts on Human Colorectal Cell Lines. Mol. Nutr. Food Res. 2025, 69, e70018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Kiselova, Y.; Ivanova, D.; Chervenkov, T.; Gerova, D.; Galunska, B.; Yankova, T. Correlation Between the In Vitro Antioxidant Activity and Polyphenol Content of Aqueous Extracts from Bulgarian Herbs. Phytother. Res. 2006, 20, 961–965. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Oktyabrsky, O.; Vysochina, G.; Muzyka, N.; Samoilova, Z.; Kukushkina, T.; Smirnova, G. Assessment of Antioxidant Activity of Plant Extracts Using Microbial Test Systems. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2009, 106, 1175–1183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Martínez-Ferri, E.; Forbes-Hernandez, T.Y.; Cervantes, L.; Soria, C.; Battino, M.; Ariza, M.T. Relation Between Strawberry Fruit Redness and Bioactivity: Deciphering the Role of Anthocyanins as Health Promoting Compounds. Foods 2024, 13, 110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Vega, E.N.; García-Herrera, P.; Ciudad-Mulero, M.; Dias, M.I.; Matallana-González, M.C.; Cámara, M.; Tardío, J.; Molina, M.; Pinela, J.; Pires, T.C.S.P.; et al. Wild Sweet Cherry, Strawberry and Bilberry as Underestimated Sources of Natural Colorants and Bioactive Compounds with Functional Properties. Food Chem. 2023, 414, 135669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Ziemlewska, A.; Zagórska-Dziok, M.; Nizioł-Łukaszewska, Z. Assessment of Cytotoxicity and Antioxidant Properties of Berry Leaves as By-Products with Potential Application in Cosmetic and Pharmaceutical Products. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 3240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  91. Ghiamati, S.; Asadi-Gharneh, H.A.; Sabaghnia, N. Antioxidant Capacity and Chemical Composition of Five Iranian Wild Strawberries (Fragaria vesca L.). Agric. For. 2020, 66, 193–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Kanodia, L.; Borgohain, M.; Das, S. Effect of Fruit Extract of Fragaria vesca L. on Experimentally Induced Inflammatory Bowel Disease in Albino Rats. Indian J. Pharmacol. 2011, 43, 18–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Hannum, S.M. Potential Impact of Strawberries on Human Health: A Review of the Science. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2004, 44, 1–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Pereira, S.; Pereira, F.A.; Santos, T.; Pereira, S.G.; Amaral, M.T.; Cardoso, O.; Batista, M.T. Activity of Strawberry (Fragaria vesca) Leaf Phenolic Extracts on Metallo-β-lactamase VIM-2 Producers Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2012, 18, 755–756. [Google Scholar]
  95. Gusev, N.F.; Dokuchaeva, Y.A.; Sycheva, M.V.; Nemereshina, O.N. Biochemical Features and Antibacterial Action of Fragaria viridis Preparations. Izv. Orenbg. State Agrar. Univ. 2016, 4, 206–209. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
  96. Kanodia, L.; Das, S. A Comparative Study of Analgesic Property of Whole Plant and Fruit Extracts of Fragaria vesca in Experimental Animal Models. J. Bangladesh Pharmacol. Soc. 2008, 4, 35–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Ivanova, E.V.; Chainikova, I.N.; Mikhailova, I.V.; Bekpergenova, A.V.; Bondarenko, T.A.; Filippova, Y.V. Fungicidal and Biofilm-Inhibiting Activity of Aqueous Extracts of Medicinal Plants Containing Tannins. Probl. Med. Mycol. 2024, 26, 64–71. (In Russian) [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Yaborova, O.V.; Sosnina, S.A.; Turyshev, A.Y. Study of Diuretic and Anti-inflammatory Activity of Infusion and Extract of Dried Strawberry Leaves. Med. Pharm. J. Pulse 2021, 23, 136–142. [Google Scholar]
  99. Takács, I.; Szekeres, A.; Takács, Á.; Rakk, D.; Mézes, M.; Polyák, Á.; Lakatos, L.; Gyémánt, G.; Csupor, D.; Kovács, K.J.; et al. Wild Strawberry, Blackberry, and Blueberry Leaf Extracts Alleviate Starch-Induced Hyperglycemia in Prediabetic and Diabetic Mice. Planta Medica 2020, 86, 790–799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Eerike, M.; Arunachalam, R.; Yeddula, V.R.; Konda, V.G.R.; Chary, R.P. Evaluation of Hypolipidemic Activity of Ethanolic and Aqueous Extracts of Fragaria vesca in High-Fat Diet Induced Hyperlipidemia in Rats. Int. J. Pharm. Sci. Rev. Res. 2014, 28, 191–196. [Google Scholar]
  101. Kitapova, R.R.; Fed’ko, I.V.; Titova, T.N.; Hamidullina, G.S.; Titova, A.A. Search for Phytogenesis Means Possessing Antitubercular Action. Vestn. VolgGMU 2018, 3, 47–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Malheiros, J.; Simões, D.M.; Antunes, P.E.; Figueirinha, A.; Cotrim, M.D.; Fonseca, D.A. Vascular effects of Fragaria vesca L. in human arteries. Nat. Prod. Res. 2023, 37, 3851–3856. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Sianipar, A.Y.; Nurbaya, S.; Adiansyah, E.; Sitanggang, E.P. Formulating Blush On from Strawberry (Fragaria vesca L.) Juice. Farmanesia 2020, 7, 5–10. [Google Scholar]
  104. Güney, S.K.; Comert, M. Research of the Use of Wild Strawberry (Fragaria vesca) in Gastronomy: The Case of Amasra. J. Tour. Gastron. Stud. 2022, 10, 1979–1991. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Korkmaz, F.M.; Ozel, M.B.; Tuzuner, T.; Korkmaz, B.; Yayli, N. Antimicrobial Activity and Volatile Constituent Analysis of Three Commercial Herbal Toothpastes Containing Aloe Vera L. and Fragaria vesca L. Extracts. Niger. J. Clin. Pract. 2019, 22, 718–726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. The wild (green) and cultivated (purple) distribution ranges of Fragaria L. species according to POWO [17].
Figure 1. The wild (green) and cultivated (purple) distribution ranges of Fragaria L. species according to POWO [17].
Plants 14 02027 g001
Figure 2. (A) Photograph of Fragaria vesca growing in Central Kazakhstan. (B) Photograph of Fragaria viridis growing in Central Kazakhstan. Original photos archived by Ishmuratova M. Yu.
Figure 2. (A) Photograph of Fragaria vesca growing in Central Kazakhstan. (B) Photograph of Fragaria viridis growing in Central Kazakhstan. Original photos archived by Ishmuratova M. Yu.
Plants 14 02027 g002
Figure 3. Volatile oils from Fragaria.
Figure 3. Volatile oils from Fragaria.
Plants 14 02027 g003
Figure 4. Flavylium cation structure of anthocyanins. R1 and R2 represent H, OH, or OCH3; R3 denotes a glycosyl group or hydrogen; R4 is either OH or a glycosyl substituent.
Figure 4. Flavylium cation structure of anthocyanins. R1 and R2 represent H, OH, or OCH3; R3 denotes a glycosyl group or hydrogen; R4 is either OH or a glycosyl substituent.
Plants 14 02027 g004
Figure 5. Anthocyanins identified in Fragaria vesca and Fragaria viridis. Part 1.
Figure 5. Anthocyanins identified in Fragaria vesca and Fragaria viridis. Part 1.
Plants 14 02027 g005
Figure 6. Anthocyanins identified in Fragaria vesca and Fragaria viridis. Part 2.
Figure 6. Anthocyanins identified in Fragaria vesca and Fragaria viridis. Part 2.
Plants 14 02027 g006
Figure 7. Flavonols in Fragaria vesca and Fragaria viridis. Part 1.
Figure 7. Flavonols in Fragaria vesca and Fragaria viridis. Part 1.
Plants 14 02027 g007
Figure 8. Flavonols in Fragaria vesca and Fragaria viridis. Part 2.
Figure 8. Flavonols in Fragaria vesca and Fragaria viridis. Part 2.
Plants 14 02027 g008
Figure 9. Flavan-3-ols identified in Fragaria vesca and Fragaria viridis.
Figure 9. Flavan-3-ols identified in Fragaria vesca and Fragaria viridis.
Plants 14 02027 g009
Figure 10. Phenolic acids identified in Fragaria vesca and Fragaria viridis: Part 1.
Figure 10. Phenolic acids identified in Fragaria vesca and Fragaria viridis: Part 1.
Plants 14 02027 g010
Figure 11. Phenolic acids identified in Fragaria vesca and Fragaria viridis: Part 2.
Figure 11. Phenolic acids identified in Fragaria vesca and Fragaria viridis: Part 2.
Plants 14 02027 g011
Figure 12. Ellagitannins from Fragaria vesca and Fragaria viridis.
Figure 12. Ellagitannins from Fragaria vesca and Fragaria viridis.
Plants 14 02027 g012
Table 1. Chemical composition of essential oils of Fragaria vesca and Fragaria viridis.
Table 1. Chemical composition of essential oils of Fragaria vesca and Fragaria viridis.
Species Location Number of Identified CompoundsMain CompoundsReference
F. vescaHelsinki99c-decalacatone, c-dodecalactone, c-octalactone, d-decalactone, a-farnesene, a-pinene, α-terpineol, linalool, nerol, and myrtenol, methyl butanoate, 1-methylbutyl butanoate, hexyl butanoate, hexyl acetate, (Z)-3-hexenyl acetate, mesifurane, furaneol, € 2-pentenal, 1-penten-3-one[32]
F. viridis (leaves and fruits)Akmola region, Kazakhstan39β-linalool (0.8–8.9%), n-nonanal (0.5–8.6%), tetradecanal (2.1–5.9%), nerolidol (2.1–4.8%), unidentified component (1.9–6.6%), α-bisabolol (0.8–6.7%), phytol (18.4–47.4%), unidentified component (0.9–8.2%)[33]
F. viridis (fruits)Akmola region, Kazakhstan34m/p-xylene (2.4–14.0%), isoledene (4.7–8.5%), methyleugenol (3.3–8.4%), α-cedrene (2.5–3.9%), unidentified component (3.4–9.1%), α-muurolene (6.8–11.3%), nerolidol (1.1–4.8%), α-cedrol (1.7–8.0%), α-bisabolol (2.3–5.0%)[33]
F. vesca (“Rugia” and “Baron von Solemacher” cv.)
(leaves)
Poland58cumene (4.9–6.8%), linalool (13.4–14.1%), nonanal (18.7–20.1%), myrtenol (14.1–14.2%), citronellol (7.6–8.8%), geraniol (6.0–6.7%) [34]
F.viridis (leaves)East Kazakhstan-nonanal (2.5%), linalool (2.6%), dodecanoic (lauric) acid (3.4%), geranyl linalool (3.6%), phytol (17.6%), tetradecanoic (myristic) acid (4.8%), hexadecenoicoic (palmitic) acid (30.7%)[35]
F. vesca (cultivar
Hawaii 4)
China141ethyl butanoate (1.2%), butyl acetate (1.883%), hexyl acetate (1.2%), octyl acetate (2.874%), 2-nonyl acetate (1.243), decyl acetate (1.536), 2-heptanone (12.413),
2-nonanone (8.935)
[23]
F. vesca (cultivar
Reugen)
China139butyl acetate (1.895%), hexyl acetate (1.771%), octyl acetate (5.657%), decyl acetate (1.536%), 2-heptanone (32.821%), 2-nonanone (16.439%)[36]
F. vesca (cultivar Yellow Wonder)China165ethyl butanoate (1.49%), butyl acetate (1.126%), hexyl acetate (1.255%), octyl acetate (3.156%), 2-heptanone (35.886%),
2-nonanone (12.81%)
[36]
F. vesca, cultivarUC4Japan57 identified estersethyl acetate (26.27%)[37]
F. vesca, cultivar UC5Japan57 identified estersoctyl acetate (80.34%)[37]
F. vesca, cultivar JinchuanJapan57 identified estersethyl acetate (17.62%), 1-methyl tridecyl acetate (20.26%), ethyl octanoate (14.53%)[37]
F. vesca, cultivar MaoxianJapan57 identified estersmyrtenyl acetate (5.49%)[37]
F. vesca, cultivar Northeast WildJapan57 identified estersoctyl acetate (12.98%), 1-methyl tridecyl acetate (39.47%), ethyl hexanoate (14.75%)[37]
F. vesca, cultivar Fifteen KuangJapan57 identified estersethyl acetate (45.77%)[37]
F. vesca, cultivar MeanJapan57 identified estersethyl acetate (14.94%), octyl acetate (18.79%), 1-methyl tridecyl acetate (10.84%)[37]
F. vescaFinland872,5-dimethyl-4-methoxy-3(2H)-furanone[38]
F. vesca, cultivar Regina delle ValliItaly131methyl anthranilate[39]
F. vescaSweden24α-muurolene (18.5%), benzaldehyde (14.5%)[40]
F. vesca, cultivar ‘Yellow WonderKorea53ethyl butanoate, 1-hexanol, hexyl acetate[38]
F. vesca, cultivar Baron Solemacher’Korea44ethyl butanoate, hexyl acetate[41]
F. vescaFinland582, 5-dimethyl-4-methoxy-3(2fl)-furanone[42]
Table 2. Combinations of anthocyanidins and functional groups determining color expression in Fragaria species.
Table 2. Combinations of anthocyanidins and functional groups determining color expression in Fragaria species.
NamePosition of Attachment to a MoleculeColor
35673′4′5′
CyanidinOHOHHOHOHOHHRed-orange
DelphinidinOHOHHOHOHOHOHRed-blue
MalvinidinOHOHHOHOCH3OHOCH3Red-blue
PelargonidinOHOHHOHHOHHOrange
PeonidinOHOHHOHOCH3OHHRed-orange
PetunidinOHOHHOHOCH3OHOHRed-blue
Table 3. Biological activity of Fragaria vesca and Fragaria viridis.
Table 3. Biological activity of Fragaria vesca and Fragaria viridis.
Biological ActivityProperties of the SampleSource
Antioxidant and antiradicalF. vesca from Serbia showed strong antioxidant activity (DPPH, FRAP)—87.12 mg AA·g−1 DW[82]
F. vesca from Slovakia antioxidant activity (phosphomolybdenum method)—679.56 ± 3.06 mg TE/g)[80]
Fruit extract of F. vesca in DPPH assay—53.92–87.17%, compared to F. × ananassa 27.21–52.58%[83]
F. viridis extracts (all ripening stages) showed strong antioxidant activity: ABTS—35.07–36.22, DPPH—27.53–29.18 µM TE·g−1 DW; F. vesca showed lower activity: ABTS—19.73, DPPH—15.21 µM TE·g−1 DW[55]
Wild F. vesca infusion: highest phenolic content 253.42 mg/g DW; strong antioxidant activity—DPPH, reducing capacity, lipid peroxidation EC50 = 50.56, 44.78, 4.76 µg/mL[84]
F. vesca extract: in SW480 cells—G2 phase arrest; in E705 cells—apoptosis via ROS increase.[85]
F. vesca extract from Bulgaria: high antioxidant activity in ABTS assay—3.74 ± 0.06 mM[86]
F. vesca extract showed highest antioxidant activity in vivo and in vitro, linked to DPPH scavenging, tannins, and antioxidant gene regulation[87]
White F. vesca fruits had higher antioxidant activity than red; all extracts reduced oxidative damage via direct antioxidants and enzyme action[88]
F. vesca showed strong antioxidant activity in OxHLIA, indicating cell protection from oxidative stress[89]
The leaf extracts of F. vesca tested demonstrated considerable free radical scavenging ability at higher concentrations[90]
F. vesca from Iran showed strong antioxidant activity, highly correlated with phenolics (r = +0.99) and anthocyanins (r = +0.93); biochemical content linked to climate factors[91]
Anti-inflammatoryEthanolic F. vesca extract (500 mg/kg) improved inflammatory bowel disease in vivo, likely due to antioxidant and anti-inflammatory effects[92]
F. vesca leaf extract significantly reduced Freund’s adjuvant-induced edema (1.3–5×) and indomethacin-enhanced edema (1.6–3.8×); also decreased hyperemia and granulomatous tissue in inflammation models[7]
The leaf extract of F. vesca inhibited cyclooxygenase activity in in vitro experiments[93]
F. vesca extract (80–160 mg/mL) reduced nitrite production, inhibited proteasome activity causing ubiquitinated protein buildup, and induced autophagy (LC3-I to LC3-II conversion)[67]
AntimicrobialF. vesca extract (0.08 g/L) demonstrated strong synergy with colistin (4 mg/L) in inhibiting a colistin-resistant phenotype of Pseudomonas aeruginosa[22]
The alcoholic extract of F. vesca leaves exhibited notable antibacterial activity against P. aeruginosa producing the metallo-β-lactamase VIM-2[94]
F. viridis leaf infusions reduced Escherichia coli growth 2–10 fold in all tested samples[95]
F. vesca crude extract and ellagitannin fraction showed antimicrobial activity against Helicobacter pylori, with the fraction inhibiting 67% at 5 mg/mL and crude extract 58% at 12.5 mg/mL[96]
AnalgesicF. vesca leaf extract showed significant analgesic effects, increasing pain response latency 1.9–2.3× in healthy and inflamed animals, and reducing pain in writhing and hot plate tests across inflammation models[96]
AntifungalAqueous F. vesca extracts showed strong antifungal activity with minimal inhibitory concentrations of 25–50 mg/mL against yeast-like fungi[97]
DiureticF. vesca leaf infusion (150 mg/kg) showed diuretic effects, increasing urine output by 2.9 mL at 24 h and 1.7 mL over the following 19 h[98]
F. vesca leaf phenolics (80% ethanol extract) increased diuresis twofold at 50 mg/kg and threefold at 100 mg/kg within 4 h, peaking in the first hour[7]
AntidiabeticF. vesca extract inhibited α-amylase and α-glucosidase by 96% and 97% at 5 mg/mL[99]
AntitumorEllagitannin-enriched fraction from F. vesca leaves showed stronger cytotoxicity than crude extract in HepG2 cells, causing G2/M arrest, autophagy inhibition, ubiquitin-proteasome system impairment, and altered metabolic proteins, indicating therapeutic potential for liver cancer[78]
Antimelanogenic effectF. vesca leaf extract inhibited the target enzyme with IC50 = 238.10 ± 15.51 µg/mL, comparable to arbutin (IC50 = 193.84 ± 14.15 µg/mL)[23]
CytotoxicityF. vesca leaf extract (2 mg/mL) significantly reduced HaCaT keratinocyte viability, indicating cytotoxicity[23]
F. vesca leaf extract affected keratinocyte and fibroblast metabolism, proliferation, and migration in vitro[90]
Anticoagulant activityF. vesca extracts and fractions showed anticoagulant activity by inhibiting the intrinsic pathway in activated partial thromboplastin time assay; purified fractions had the strongest effects[29]
HypolipidemicEthanolic (250–500 mg/kg) and aqueous (500 mg/dL) F. vesca fruit extracts showed significant hypolipidemic activity; 500 mg/kg ethanolic extract matched atorvastatin in vivo[100]
AntitubercularF. vesca extract (10%) strongly inhibited growth of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex strains[101]
Effects on the cardiovascular systemF. vesca leaf aqueous extract caused dose-dependent, endothelium-dependent vasodilation via NO stimulation without affecting heart rate or contractility[63]
The hydroalcoholic extract of F. vesca did not significantly alter basal vascular tone (Emax = 0.62 ± 0.48 mN, n = 3); however, the leaf extract substantially potentiated the contractile response to norepinephrine[102]
Antidepressant effectTwo benzyl derivatives from F. vesca var. nubicola Lindl. ex Hook.f. showed significant antidepressant-like effects in tail suspension and forced swim tests[81]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Atazhanova, G.A.; Kurmantayeva, G.K.; Levaya, Y.K.; Ishmuratova, M.Y.; Smagulov, M.K. A Review of Botany, Phytochemistry, and Biological Activities of Fragaria vesca and Fragaria viridis Widespread in Kazakhstan. Plants 2025, 14, 2027. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants14132027

AMA Style

Atazhanova GA, Kurmantayeva GK, Levaya YK, Ishmuratova MY, Smagulov MK. A Review of Botany, Phytochemistry, and Biological Activities of Fragaria vesca and Fragaria viridis Widespread in Kazakhstan. Plants. 2025; 14(13):2027. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants14132027

Chicago/Turabian Style

Atazhanova, Gayane A., Gulnissa K. Kurmantayeva, Yana K. Levaya, Margarita Yu Ishmuratova, and Marlen K. Smagulov. 2025. "A Review of Botany, Phytochemistry, and Biological Activities of Fragaria vesca and Fragaria viridis Widespread in Kazakhstan" Plants 14, no. 13: 2027. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants14132027

APA Style

Atazhanova, G. A., Kurmantayeva, G. K., Levaya, Y. K., Ishmuratova, M. Y., & Smagulov, M. K. (2025). A Review of Botany, Phytochemistry, and Biological Activities of Fragaria vesca and Fragaria viridis Widespread in Kazakhstan. Plants, 14(13), 2027. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants14132027

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop