Next Article in Journal
Transcriptome Analysis of Apple Leaves with Apple Necrotic Mosaic Virus-Associated Mosaic Symptoms
Previous Article in Journal
Identification and Expression Analysis of Rice MYB Family Members in Response to Heat Stress
Previous Article in Special Issue
Improving Nutrient Use Efficiency of Rice Under Alternative Wetting and Drying Irrigation Combined with Slow-Release Nitrogen Fertilization
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Genetic Characterization and Symbiotic Performance of Soybean Rhizobia Under Cold and Water-Deficient Conditions in Poland

by
Riku Watanabe
1,
Maria Daniela Artigas Ramirez
2,3,4,
Shin-ichiro Agake
4,
Sonoko Dorothea Bellingrath-Kimura
5,6,
Sylwia Lewandowska
7,
Yuki Onishi
8,
Yohei Nishikawa
9,
Haruko Takeyama
8,9,10,
Michiko Yasuda
4,* and
Naoko Ohkama-Ohtsu
4,11,*
1
Graduate School of Agriculture, Tokyo University of Agriculture and Technology, 3-5-8, Saiwai-cho, Fuchu 183-8509, Tokyo, Japan
2
College of Biological Science and Technology, Beijing Forestry University, No. 35, Qinghua East Road, Haidian District, Beijing 100083, China
3
Center for Applied Biotechnology (CBA), Faculty of Experimental Science and Technology, Department of Biology, University of Carabobo, Valencia 2001, Carabobo, Venezuela
4
Institute of Global Innovation Research, Tokyo University of Agriculture and Technology, 3-5-8, Saiwai-cho, Fuchu 183-8509, Tokyo, Japan
5
Leibniz Centre for Agricultural Landscape Research (ZALF), Eberswalder Str. 84, 15374 Müncheberg, Germany
6
Faculty of Life Sciences, Humboldt-University of Berlin, Unter den Linden 6, 10099 Berlin, Germany
7
Department of Genetics, Plant Breeding and Seed Production, Wrocław University of Environmental and Life Sciences, Pl. Grunwaldzki 24A, 50-363 Wrocław, Poland
8
Graduate School of Advanced Science and Engineering, Waseda University, 2-2 Wakamatsu-cho, Shinjuku-ku 162-8480, Tokyo, Japan
9
Research Organization for Nano & Life Innovation, Waseda University, 513 Waseda Tsurumaki-cho, Shinjuku-ku 162-0041, Tokyo, Japan
10
Institute for Advanced Research of Biosystem Dynamics, Waseda Research Institute for Science and Engineering, Graduate School of Advanced Science and Engineering, Waseda University, 3-4-1 Okubo, Shinjuku-ku 169-8555, Tokyo, Japan
11
Institute of Agriculture, Tokyo University of Agriculture and Technology, 3-5-8, Saiwai-cho, Fuchu 183-8509, Tokyo, Japan
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Plants 2025, 14(12), 1786; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants14121786
Submission received: 3 May 2025 / Revised: 1 June 2025 / Accepted: 6 June 2025 / Published: 11 June 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Nitrogen Nutrition in Plants)

Abstract

Soybeans have been cultivated in Poland for more than 140 years. However, Poland’s cold and water-deficient climatic conditions hinder soybean cultivation. Although the availability of suitable soybean varieties in Poland contributes to meeting the demand for soybean production, it is important to identify rhizobial inoculants in Polish soils suitable for soybean cultivation. In this study, we cultivated soybean varieties (Abelina, Merlin, and Sultana) grown in soils taken from four regions in Poland and isolated 330 strains from soybean root nodules. 16S rRNA gene sequencing identified 49 strains of highly stress-tolerant nodule-associated bacteria, including Bradyrhizobium, Rhizobium, Ensifer, Tardiphaga, and Ralstonia spp. Several isolates exhibited positive effects on soybean growth under cold and water-deficient conditions. In particular, the isolate Bradyrhizobium japonicum PSN49, which is phylogenetically similar to B. japonicum USDA 123, increased plant biomass and nodule formation in the soybean cultivar Abelina under abiotic stress conditions due to its high nitrogen-fixing activity. Whole-genome comparisons between PSN49 and other Bradyrhizobium strains revealed that trehalose biosynthesis genes and cold shock proteins contributed to cold stress tolerance. These findings and the strains identified in this study will enhance soybean production and deepen the understanding of the soybean–rhizobium relationship in Poland.

1. Introduction

Soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merr.) is one of the most important legume plants worldwide, and its seed contains a high amount of protein. Its origins are in East Asia, including China and Japan. The history of soybean cultivation in Japan dates back to before the common era (BCE); however, in Europe, it was only introduced around the 18th century [1]. In European countries, soybeans are mainly used for livestock feed [2] and green manure rather than human food, chemical [3,4], or pharmaceutical applications [5,6]. The demand for Polish field production is systematically increasing to ensure food security. Moreover, soybeans are receiving considerable attention for plant-based meats because of their health and environmental benefits. Therefore, it is important to increase soybean production [7] and to be independent as a country. According to Lewandowska (2016) [8], for many farmers in Poland, the production of this plant is a “godsend” for defective rotations that mainly consist of cereals, maize, and rapeseed. The inclusion of soybean cultivation in crop sequences is an important and valuable element [9]. In Poland, soybeans have been introduced and tested for more than 140 years; however, the first milestone in cultivating this species was only achieved in the second decade of the 21st century. In 2019, the area of soybean cultivation in Poland was 20,000 ha. This area increased to 80,000 ha by 2024. This rapid growth in recent decades indicates that soybean production and cultivation areas in Poland could further increase in the future.
In Poland, as well as in the European Union (EU), there is a need to provide non-GM feed protein sources. Currently, Poland imports approximately 2 million tons of genetically modified (GM) varieties of soybean meal for a total of EUR 4 billion [7]. In the EU, soybean meal is used as the primary source of plant protein in the feed of livestock, such as poultry and cattle [10]. The EU is the largest importer of soybean meal, accounting for 70% of the high-protein components used in the production of compound feed. This results in a dependence on protein purchased from other countries like the USA, Brazil, and Argentina. Therefore, attempts to cultivate soybeans under Polish conditions are needed. One way to achieve a protein balance is to improve legume yields and, in particular, to improve soybean agronomics in European countries [11,12].
Rhizobia are mainly soil diazotrophic bacteria that form nodules on legume roots and fix atmospheric nitrogen (N2). They reduce N2 to ammonia and then supply it to their host plants. Nitrogenases, encoded by nif genes, principally nifHDK, catalyze this reaction. The rhizobia promote host plant growth, and, in return, the host supplies photosynthesized carbon to the rhizobia. Thus, through legume–rhizobium symbiosis, a process called biological nitrogen fixation is realized, contributing to a reduction in chemical nitrogen fertilization. Most rhizobia belong to Alphaproteobacteria, including Rhizobium, Bradyrhizobium, Ensifer, Mesorhizobium, and Azorhizobium [13,14]. However, some rhizobia are related to Betaproteobacteria, such as Paraburkholderia and Cupriavidus [15,16]. The symbiotic relationship between rhizobia and a host plant strongly depends on host genetics, specificity, and the environment. This relationship is accomplished through molecular signaling. The bacterial nod gene cluster is associated with nodule formation in rhizobia [17]. The most common nod gene, considered the most important among the more than 20 nod genes, is nodDABC. Symbiosis is initiated by the binding of flavonoids secreted by the legume roots to the nodD protein.
The interaction between soybeans and rhizobia is well known. Bradyrhizobium species (slow-growing bacteria), such as Bradyrhizobium japonicum, Bradyrhizobium diazoefficiens, Bradyrhizobium elkanii, Bradyrhizobium yuanmingense, and Bradyrhizobium liaoningense, and Ensifer species (fast-growing bacteria), such as Ensifer fredii, are mainly available as commercial soybean inoculants [18,19,20,21,22]. Currently, imported inoculants are widely used in Poland. However, soybeans with these inoculants form few root nodules, leading to a decrease in the soybean–rhizobia interaction efficiency and, consequently, lower yields under severe cold and water-deficient conditions. Numerous studies on soybean–rhizobium symbiosis and cold or drought stress have been conducted, mainly in countries with severe climates. In Canada, a country with a severely cold climate, a locally adapted rhizobium, B. japonicum 532C, is available as a cold-tolerant commercial soybean rhizobium inoculant [23]. Bradyrhizobium sp., isolated under arid conditions in Argentina, was found to improve soybean production compared to the commercial inoculant B. japonicum E109 [24]. In Germany, located to the west of Poland, soybean rhizobia (Bradyrhizobium and Rhizobium spp.) exhibit a high biomass and nitrogen fixation activities [25,26]. Therefore, it is important to introduce and develop rhizobial inoculants that are suitable for the local environmental conditions and cultivated varieties. According to an American study, the success of soybean growing depends on a combination of weather conditions, soil type, and cultivar [27]. The identification of a suitable cultivar that tolerates unfavorable weather conditions is essential to promote further progress in breeding work [28]. By developing new varieties adapted to the Polish soil and climatic conditions, soybean meal imports can be reduced. Recently, the growth and yield of soybeans in the cold climates of Poland have been verified [29]. Abelina produces relatively high yields in cold environments. Abelina and Merlin, originally Austrian (AT) cultivars but reproduced in Poland, are currently the most popular soybean varieties in Poland. The cultivar Merlin was the most popular variety grown in Poland during 2010–2022. However, no rhizobial inoculants have been developed for these soybean cultivars in Poland.
This study aimed to determine the best native strains for use as novel soybean inoculants in Poland. Therefore, we isolated and identified locally adapted rhizobia suitable for the Polish environment and screened for strains with the highest symbiotic performance, abiotic stress tolerance, and nitrogen-fixing activity. Whole genome sequencing was also performed on the most promising strain to gain insight into the basis of its growth promotion in severe environments.

2. Results

2.1. Isolation and Phenotypical Characterization of Rhizobia from Polish Soils

The soybean cultivars Abelina, Sultana, and Merlin were grown to isolate abiotic stress-tolerant rhizobia from soils in Poland (Figure 1, Table 1). In total, 330 strains of indigenous nodule-associated bacteria were isolated from the soybean root nodules. Most of the isolates were obtained from fields with a history of soybean cultivation. Only a few rhizobia were isolated from fields without a history of soybean production. Rhizobia could not be isolated from soil sample nos. 3, 4, 5, and 7 (Table 1 and Table S1). After cultivation, plants in the field with no history of soybean growth had yellow leaves, similar to the non-inoculated plants; however, plants in the field soil with a history of soybean cultivation were greener (Figure S1).

2.2. Environmental Stress Potential of Polish Rhizobia

To screen for rhizobia that can endure severe abiotic stress in Poland, the tolerance of the 330 strains was evaluated (Figure 2). Some strains showed an extremely high tolerance to cold, osmotic, and salinity stresses: 18 strains were cold stress-tolerant, 107 were osmotic stress-tolerant, and 66 strains were salinity stress-tolerant. Approximately 86% of the strains isolated from Abelina root nodules survived on YMA containing 10% mannitol, whereas only 58% and 69% of Merlin- and Sultana-isolated rhizobia, respectively, displayed tolerance.

2.3. Phylogenetic Characterization of Rhizobia

Forty-nine strains were selected as the top-performing strains based on their origin and stress tolerance. Based on 16S rRNA gene sequencing, the representative strains were separated into two groups (I and II; Figure 3). Group I, Alphaproteobacteria, comprised four subgroups: Group IA, containing Bradyrhizobium; Group IB, containing Tardiphaga; Group IC, containing Ensifer and Rhizobium; and Group ID, containing Rhizobium. Group II, containing Ralstonia, was classified as Betaproteobacteria. Bradyrhizobium was identified as the most abundant genus (71%, 35 strains). Both strains of Tardiphaga were isolated from soil samples without a history of soybean cultivation (soil sample nos. 1 and 6; Table S2). Most Bradyrhizobium (34 strains) samples were isolated from fields with a history of soybean cultivation. Tardiphaga and Ralstonia, which are not known as rhizobia, were excluded from further assays. Based on the stress tolerance potential and 16S rRNA gene sequences, nine strains were identified as promising strains for further MLST and plant assays.

2.4. Nitrogen Fixation-Associated Gene Sequencing and MSLT in Rhizobia

Forty-four representative strains were further evaluated for nitrogen fixation-related genes (nodD, a nodulation protein D gene; nifH, a nitrogenase reductase gene) and subjected to phylogenetic analysis. The nodD and nifH genes were amplified in 39 and 43 strains, respectively. The nodD of the strains was divided into Group I (containing B. japonicum USDA 6T) and Group II (containing Rhizobium etli CFN 42T). The nodD gene of most strains (34 strains, 87% of the amplified genes) was classified as Group I and was orthologous to B. japonicum USDA 6T (Figure S2). Rhizobium PMN31 also showed the presence of the nodD gene, which was orthologous to B. japonicum USDA 6T. The nodD gene was not amplified in PAP2, PAT8, PAN13, PAN21, and PMN27.
Similar results were observed for nifH as for nodD. The nifH genes were sorted into three groups: Group IA, which contained B. japonicum USDA 6T; Group IB, which contained B. amphicarpae 39S1MBT; and Group II, which contained R. etli CFN 42T (Figure S3). Almost 84% of the amplified genes (36 strains), including those of Rhizobium PAN13 and PMN31 and Ensifer PAN21, were genetically similar to B. japonicum USDA 6T. The nifH gene of PMN27 was not amplified.
Housekeeping genes of the nine strains selected as promising bacteria were analyzed (Figure S4). Classification based on the concatenated sequences showed that all five Bradyrhizobium strains were phylogenetically similar to B. japonicum USDA 123.

2.5. Plant Inoculation Assays

To evaluate symbiotic performance, nine representative strains—five Bradyrhizobium, three Rhizobium, and one Ensifer—were selected based on the 16S rRNA gene sequence and inoculated onto the host plant, soybean. Three European soybean cultivars—Abelina, Merlin, and Sultana—were used for the assay. Upon inoculation of the isolated rhizobia in Abelina, one of the most popular cultivars in Poland, all strains induced soybean nodule formation and nitrogen fixation (Table 2). Compared to the positive control, namely, B. diazoefficiens USDA 110T, inoculation with strains other than PAN21 and PMN31 resulted in comparable increases in plant biomass. Of note, B. japonicum PSN49 showed the highest plant growth-promoting effects, with an increase of 67.7% in root dry weight and 17% in whole plant biomass, compared with plants inoculated with B. diazoefficiens USDA 110T. B. japonicum PMN37 and PMN35 induced a significant increase in the nodule dry weight in Abelina. The number of nodules in Abelina increased upon inoculation with Ensifer sp. PAN21.
Similarly, for other soybean varieties, inoculation with several isolates, such as PSN49, resulted in increases in biomass similar to that induced by B. diazoefficiens USDA 110T (Tables S3 and S4). However, no significant increase was observed in Merlin, except for the number of nodules when inoculated with PAN13. In Sultana, inoculation with PMN31 and PMN30 significantly increased nodule dry weight, while inoculation with PMN30 also led to a significant increase in the number of nodules and acetylene reduction activity.

2.6. Plant Inoculation Assays Under Cold Conditions

Based on the plant inoculation tests under normal environmental conditions, two strains of Bradyrhizobium (PMN37 and PSN49) were selected for pot tests under low-temperature conditions. As shown in Figure 4a, plants with adequate nitrogen fixation maintained their green color, whereas the non-inoculated plants turned yellowish. Bradyrhizobium strains had a stable and positive effect on Abelina. Plants inoculated with B. japonicum PSN37 had an increased shoot biomass compared to B. diazoefficiens USDA 110T, but the difference was not significant (Figure 4b). Moreover, inoculation with B. japonicum PSN37 led to a significant increase in the root and nodule dry weights of Abelina (Figure 4c,d, and Table S5). Inoculation with B. japonicum PSN49 also caused a significant increase in nodule dry weight. However, the two Bradyrhizobium strains did not alter the nitrogen content, SPAD value, or acetylene reduction activity of the plants (Figure 4f–h).
PMN37 and PSN49 promoted Merlin and Abelina growth. Plants inoculated with PMN37 or PSN49 showed increased shoot and root dry weights and nodule numbers; however, the differences were not significant (Figure S5a,b,d). Plants inoculated with PSN49 showed significantly higher nodule dry weights than those of B. diazoefficiens USDA 110T (Figure S5c). PMN37 also resulted in a high nodule dry weight for Merlin. However, the isolates did not contribute to an increase in the SPAD and acetylene reduction activities (Figure S5e,f).

2.7. Plant Inoculation Assays Under Water-Deficient Conditions

Plant assays were performed under water-deficient conditions with the same four strains used in the cold conditions. After 6 weeks of cultivation, leaf color was not as markedly different from that noted under cold conditions (Figure 5a). Under water-deficient conditions, plant growth was greatly enhanced by B. japonicum PSN49 inoculation, unlike what was noted under the cold conditions. PSN49 had a significantly positive effect on the shoot dry weight, root dry weight, nodule dry weight, and nitrogen content of Abelina compared to B. diazoefficiens USDA 110T (Figure 5b–d,f; Table S5). The nodule dry weights of plants inoculated with PMN37 and PSN49 were significantly increased (Figure 5d).
The root dry weights of Merlin increased significantly upon non-inoculation (n.i.) and inoculation with PMN37 (Figure S6b). Inoculation with PSN49 or PMN37 tended to induce an increase in nodule dry weight compared with B. diazoefficiens USDA 110T; however, no differences in shoot biomass or SPAD values were observed (Figure S6c). Similar to Abelina, PSN49 and PSN37 exhibited strong growth-promoting effects in Merlin.

2.8. Whole Genome Sequencing of PSN49

Whole genome sequencing was performed on the PSN49 strain, which promoted soybean growth under the abiotic stress conditions. The PSN49 genome is composed of 11,082,922 bp of DNA, containing 10,931 CDSs (Table 3 and Table S6). In addition to MLST, orthoANI value calculations (https://www.ezbiocloud.net/tools/ani, accessed on 15 December 2024) of other Bradyrhizobium strains and phylogenetic analysis showed that PSN49 is a strain that is genetically close to B. japonicum USDA 123.
Cold or drought stress-associated genes are listed in Table S7 given that PSN49 contributed to soybean growth promotion under abiotic stress conditions. AcdS (1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate (ACC) deaminase) was annotated as a gene associated with plant growth promotion under abiotic stress conditions. The cold stress adaptation-associated genes were also annotated as follows: cspA (cold shock protein), gyrA (DNA gyrase), clpBP (protein folding-associated genes), dnaK (heat shock protein 70), rnr (ribonuclease R), and DEAD-box protein-coding genes deaD, rhlB, dbpA, and rhlE. The PSN49 genome contained sixteen copies of cspA genes, while the B. diazoefficiens USDA 110T genome only possessed twelve copies. Moreover, dbpA was annotated in the PSN49 genome, coding for a DEAD-box family ATP-dependent RNA helicase. A comparison of the OrthoFinder results between the PSN49 and B. diazoefficiens USDA 110T genome and the NCBI database showed that B. diazoefficiens USDA 110T has no dbpA-coding gene. PSN49 genome annotation indicated the presence of the following osmotic stress adaptation-associated genes: cell membrane adaptation-associated genes (desR and fabF), an ectoine synthase gene (ectC), proline synthase genes (proABC), trehalose synthase-associated genes (otsAB and treSYZ), trehalose synthase genes (betAB), and polyamine synthase-associated genes (hss, arcA, and speCEF). According to OrthoFinder and the NCBI database, the desR-coding gene (desR), which encodes a transcriptional regulatory protein, is present in the PSN49 genome but not in the B. diazoefficiens USDA 110T genome. The following oxidative stress adaptation-associated genes were also annotated: superoxide dismutase (sodB and chrC), catalase (katAEG), and glutathione S-transferase (gstB).
These genes were classified into COG categories with the orthologues of B. diazoefficiens USDA 30 and USDA 110T, B. elkanii USDA 31, and B. japonicum USDA 6T (Figure 6a). Compared to the other strains, PSN49 and B. diazoefficiens USDA 30 had more genes associated with carbohydrate transport and metabolism (G), including genes involved in the trehalose synthesis pathway. In the transcription category (K), PSN49, B. diazoefficiens USDA 30, and B. elkanii USDA 31 had a higher number of genes than the other strains. Genes encoding cold shock proteins accounted for most (84.6–94.1%) of this category. A total of 59 representative proteins in the genome of PSN49 were selected and reported in Table S7; the similarity of the proteins to those of nineteen Bradyrhizobium strains was evaluated using BLASTp (Figure 6b). The trehalose-6-phosphate synthase protein in PSN49 was notably different from the other strains. This genome contained three copies of this gene, including one orthologous to that of all strains (80.4–100% identity); one orthologous to that of B. elkanii USDA 31, USDA 46, and USDA 76T (91.32% identity); and another orthologous to that of several strains of B. japonicum (100.00% identity), B. diazoefficiens USDA 30 (85.56% identity), and B. elkanii USDA 46 (71.72% identity). Proteins with a high identity to dbpA and desR were not identified in some B. japonicum and other Bradyrhizobium. Only a single copy was present in the genome of B. diazoefficiens USDA 110T. In addition, B. diazoefficiens USDA 110T lacked orthologues to clpP_3, dbpA, desR, betA_2, betB_1, and speE_1 of PSN49, although several other strains possessed them.

3. Discussion

3.1. Diversity of the Soybean Rhizobia Isolated from Polish Soil with Inoculant History

In the present study, we isolated rhizobia from 19 soil samples in western Poland using three varieties of soybeans (Abelina, Sultana, and Merlin) as host plants. A clear difference was observed in the number of nodules formed between fields without a history of soybean cultivation (soil sample nos. 1–9) and those with a history (soil sample nos. 10–19). Consistent with Yuan et al. (2020) [26], the number of nodules formed in the soil from fields with a history was large compared to those without a history (Figure S1; Table S1). In fields with a history, a B. japonicum inoculant was used as the symbiotic partner. In Poland, Bradyrhizobium rhizobia have been used as a viable inoculant for more than 7 years, or even 20 years in some locations, in soybean fields cultivated without the use of additional inoculants [33,34]. Past soybean cultivation and the application of rhizobial inoculants potentially affected the community structure of soil rhizobia and increased the survivability and priority of soybean rhizobia in the soil, even under cold and water-deficient conditions in Poland. Furthermore, these strains were considered environmentally adapted to rhizobia in this country and were used for further assays.

3.2. High Compatibility Between Abelina and Highly Osmotic-Tolerant Rhizobia

Under severe abiotic stress conditions, legumes have a reduced number of nodules, and their nitrogen-fixing activity is suppressed [35]. Tolerance to abiotic stress in rhizobia is crucial for soybean cultivation in specific environments [35]. Many rhizobia isolated from the Abelina nodules were highly tolerant to osmotic stress (Figure 2). Abelina is a cultivar that is widely grown in Poland. In Łączka, eastern Poland, Abelina showed a higher biomass and an increased accumulation of atmospheric nitrogen compared to Merlin [36]. Despite the differences between eastern and western Poland, Abelina potentially represents a soybean that is more suited to the drought environment in Poland and has a higher nodule formation capacity. When rhizobia were isolated from German soil using the Japanese cultivar Glycine max Enrei and the European cultivar Merlin as host plants, the isolates from Merlin were more tolerant to low-temperature stress and better adapted to the German environment [26]. As all three soybean cultivars used in this study were European varieties, no significant differences emerged. However, the results suggest the possibility that Abelina, which shows good growth in water-deficient Polish environments, may be suitable for the isolation of rhizobia with high osmotic stress tolerance.

3.3. Phylogenetic Characteristics of Locally Adapted Bradyrhizobium Strains Contribute to Soybean Growth Under Abiotic Stress Conditions

Bradyrhizobium spp. were isolated from the soil of various fields in Poland using three soybean cultivars as hosts. As Bradyrhizobium rhizobia are known to have a tight symbiosis with soybeans, these locally adapted Bradyrhizobium strains and Polish soybean cultivars were expected to show a beneficial relationship [37]. In the MLST-based taxonomy, five strains selected from these Bradyrhizobium strains showed higher homology to B. japonicum USDA 123 than to B. japonicum USDA 6T, a major soybean rhizobium (Figure S4a). Notably, B. japonicum USDA 123 originates from the United States. Although this strain is a highly competitive rhizobium, it has a relatively low nitrogen-fixing capacity [38,39]. In Minnesota, it was reported that in co-inoculation with B. japonicum USDA 123 and B. diazoefficiens USDA 110T for soybean, B. japonicum USDA 123 and the locally adapted serocluster 123 rhizobia dominated the soybean root nodules, whereas inoculation with B. diazoefficiens USDA 110T inhibited root nodule formation [37,40]. Madrzak et al. isolated soybean rhizobia from four sites located in western Poland [41]. All isolates were obtained from soybean fields with inoculants, and 87.5% of the serologically analyzed B. japonicum isolates belonged to serocluster 123, indicating that serocluster 123 is highly competitive in Poland. However, these isolates were not serologically identified in the present study. To describe the relationship among soybeans, Bradyrhizobium, and the serotype of rhizobium, serotyping is required. In the eastern region of Germany, neighboring Poland, some Bradyrhizobium spp. were isolated from soybean cultivation fields with Bradyrhizobium inoculants using methods similar to those used in the present study [26]. However, the homology of the housekeeping genes (atpD and recA) in the isolates in this study was low. The five Bradyrhizobium strains subjected to MLST in this study were particularly stress-tolerant bacteria. Therefore, although it is possible that a closely related strain of B. japonicum USDA 123 was only identified by chance, it is highly likely that a closely related strain of B. japonicum USDA 123 was specifically adapted to the Polish environment and involved in soybean nodule formation. According to Yuan et al. (2020), the German isolates improved the growth of Merlin under cold conditions [26]. In this study, the isolates were more effective on Abelina under water-deficient conditions than on Merlin under cold conditions (Figure 5 and Figure S5). These results suggest that slight differences in the climate and environment as well as adapted varieties were reflected in these results. Our results indicate the importance of the isolation of rhizobia adapted to the cultivation conditions, the location, and climatic conditions.
Plant assays under abiotic stress conditions demonstrated that the isolated locally adapted Bradyrhizobium strains have the potential to improve soybean growth in western Poland. In particular, under drought stress conditions, B. japonicum PSN49 exhibited a high biomass and nitrogen content (Figure 5). The bioassay also showed that PSN49 had a high salinity stress tolerance on YMA plates (Table S2). Thus, the plant and bioassay results were consistent. These findings indicate that the tolerance of rhizobium to drought stress directly influences the effectiveness of soybean inoculation under water-deficient conditions. As mentioned above, PMN37 and PSN49 are B. japonicum USDA 123-related strains. To date, no reports have suggested that B. japonicum USDA 123 improves soybean growth under abiotic stresses or mitigates abiotic stress in soybeans. However, 79% of the serocluster 123 USDA rhizobia, including B. japonicum USDA 123, can biosynthesize polysaccharides in nodules; in contrast, B. diazoefficiens USDA 110T and B. japonicum USDA 6T do not [42]. Moreover, when temperatures are reduced to 30, 25, and 20 °C, B. japonicum USDA 123 up-regulates the expression of nodC (one of the nodule formation-associated genes) [43]. In this study, the inoculation of every soybean cultivar with PMN37 or PSN49 led to an increase in nodule dry weight (Figures S5 and S6), and the rates of increase were extremely high (50–114% increase compared to B. diazoefficiens USDA 110 inoculation). Shiro et al. reported that B. japonicum USDA 123 increased its competitiveness under cold conditions when soybeans were inoculated with other Bradyrhizobium strains [43]. Therefore, PMN37 and PSN49 exhibited high potential under severe environmental conditions in Poland. An increase in nodule dry weight directly induces host plant biomass under drought stress. However, there are other factors to be considered, such as cold stress tolerance.
In particular, our results indicated a very close relationship among three factors: the soybean cultivar Abelina, locally adapted Bradyrhizobium strains, and water-deficient stress conditions. Approximately 86% of the strains isolated from Abelina root nodules showed osmotic stress tolerance (survival on YMA containing 10% mannitol; Figure 2). Regarding the other host cultivar isolates, 58% and 69% of the strains from Merlin and Sultana, respectively, showed osmotic stress tolerance. Moreover, the locally adapted Bradyrhizobium strains only yielded a significantly high biomass in Abelina, whereas they only had positive effects on Merlin to some extent. PMN37 and PSN49 were isolated from the Merlin and Sultana plants, respectively (Table S2). Although not from Abelina, a combination of Abelina-derived strains and these strains may be more effective in Poland.

3.4. Genomic Approach for Assessment of the Abiotic Stress Adaptation of PSN49

The genetic properties of PSN49 were revealed using whole genome sequencing, predicting the plant growth-promoting potential of this strain for soybeans under stress conditions. Many genes associated with abiotic stress adaptation have been annotated on the genome. Most of its cold-inducible proteins are involved in RNA metabolism, such as the cold shock family of proteins (Csps) and the RNA helicase DeaD [44]. Low temperatures cause the stabilization of the secondary structures of nucleic acids, which can affect transcription, RNA degradation, and translation [45]. Csps are among the most up-regulated proteins in response to cold shock and are nucleic acid-binding proteins containing a highly conserved cold shock domain that harbors the nucleic acid-binding motifs [45,46]. Csps function by binding to RNA and promoting the formation of single-stranded RNA by unwinding bases [47,48]. Csps promote protein translation and have been suggested to contribute to translational selectivity at low temperatures [49]. In addition, Csps function in the regulation of the transcription of two cold shock genes, hns and gyrA [50,51]. The genome of PSN49 harbors more copies of cspA genes than that of B. diazoefficiens USDA 110T. According to the NCBI database, the numbers of Csp-coding genes of the other B. japonicum strains, USDA 6T, USDA 135, and SEMIA 5079, are eleven, twelve, and six, respectively. R. etli CFN 42, Rhizobium leguminorasum ATCC 14479, and Ensifer meliloti MABNR56 have eight, nine, and nine copies of Csps, respectively (Table S8). This suggests the specificity of the copy number of Csps in the genome of PSN49. B. diazoefficiens USDA 30 and B. elkanii USDA 31 also have more copies of cold shock proteins (Figure 6a; Table S7). These strains were isolated from the northern regions in the USA and improved the yield, leaf area, protein production, nitrogen content, and nodule formation of soybeans more than the commercial Canadian strain B. japonicum 532 C under field conditions in Canada [52,53]. Our results indicate a possible relationship among the following three factors: soybean growth promotion under abiotic stress conditions, the cold environment of the isolation source, and cold shock proteins. Helicase DeaD can melt secondary structures and facilitate their degradation by the cold shock exoribonucleases PNPase and RNase R [44]. DEAD-box family genes in soybean are induced by rhizobia and/or highly expressed in the nodule; thus, DEAD-box family proteins play a crucial role in soybean–rhizobium symbiosis [54]. The dbpA gene is one of the DEAD-box family protein-coding genes specifically identified on the genome of PSN49 (Figure 6b). In Yersinia pseudotuberculosis, a Proteobacteria, dbpA mutation significantly impaired growth at low temperatures, suggesting a requirement for this gene in Y. pseudotuberculosis under cold stress conditions [55]. In addition, under desiccation-induced stress, a DEAD-box ATP-dependent RNA helicase coding gene is induced in B. japonicum [56]. It has been suggested that there is a correlation between the induction of DEAD-box RNA helicases and salinity and drought stress in plants [57]. Only five strains, with the exception of PSN49, had this protein in our plotting results; therefore, it is difficult to predict the functions of this protein in Bradyrhizobium. It may play an important role in soybean inoculants under stress conditions.
The adaptation of bacterial cell membranes to cold and osmotic stress involves membrane fluidity through the rapid desaturation of fatty acids [44,58]. At low temperatures, this occurs through the induction of fatty acid desaturase, regulated by the sensor kinase DesK and the response regulator DesR in Bacillus subtilis [59]. In Pseudomonas aeruginosa, a mutant of fatty acid desaturase, regulation is inhibited by high concentrations of NaCl, and the expression of osmoprotectant synthesis genes is suppressed [58]. No description of the desR gene in Bradyrhizobium has been reported; therefore, it is difficult to predict the function of this gene in PSN49. However, there is a gene coding for a sensor histidine kinase that is located five genes upstream of the desR gene in this genome. It is possible that these genes are involved in the regulation of fatty acid desaturase.
The BLASTp plots of the annotated genes revealed the specificity of the trehalose-6-phosphate synthase in PSN49 (Figure 6b). The first gene (otsA_1) was predicted to be a common protein in the genus of Bradyrhizobium, whereas the second and third were additional copies of this protein. B. elkanii USDA 31 and USDA 46 possessed the second gene. B. japonicum USDA 5 and USDA 28, B. diazoefficiens USDA 30, and B. elkanii USDA 46 had the third gene. The otsA gene of Bradyrhizobium is involved in intracellular trehalose synthesis and accumulation induced by salinity and desiccation stresses [56,60]. Sugawara et al. showed that otsA is important for soybean root nodule maturation [60]. The application of trehalose improved B. japonicum survival on soybean seeds under desiccation stress, indicating the importance of trehalose for soybean rhizobial inoculants [61]. Trehalose concentrations are higher in B. elkanii USDA 46 and B. japonicum USDA 5 and USDA 28 on soybean seeds than that in B. diazoefficiens USDA 110 [62]. Streeter also found a significant positive correlation between trehalose accumulation and seed survival across strains, as well as the increased survival of B. japonicum USDA 5 and USDA 28. In addition, the aforementioned B. diazoefficiens USDA 30 and B. elkanii USDA 31 strains are low-temperature-tolerant rhizobia that promote soybean growth in cold environments [52,53]. These five strains and PSN49 partially share multiple copies of the trehalose-6-phosphate synthase orthologue. This result indicates a possible specificity of trehalose synthesis in PSN49 and the importance of trehalose for the relationship between Bradyrhizobium bacteria and abiotic stress. Therefore, these putative proteins in PSN49 are predicted to play important roles in promoting soybean growth under cold and water-deficient conditions. Interestingly, PSN49 possessed an orthologue that is common in B. elkanii. Soybean nodules formed by a B. elkanii strain accumulate higher trehalose concentrations [63]. It is difficult to understand the mechanisms by which PSN49 acquired this orthologue in the present study alone. Our results indicate that this strain is an important genetic resource, providing not only a soybean inoculant under stress conditions but also new insights into the relationship between bacterial trehalose and abiotic stress.
The PSN49 genome contains many genes associated with cold and water-deficient stress, including these three types of genes. These genes are predicted to be involved in the growth promotion of soybeans under abiotic stress conditions by PSN49. However, these whole-genome analysis results are only predictions and do not indicate the phenotypes of these strains. Further investigation is required to describe the contribution of these abiotic stress-associated genes to soybean growth.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Isolation of Soybean Rhizobia from Polish Soils

Nineteen soil samples were collected from different fields in western Poland (Table 1, Figure 1). The fields were divided into four regions. Seven fields (soil sample nos. 1 and 14–19) were located in Nowy Roznow/Nowe Goluszowice (50°11′ N; 17°49′ E), three (soil sample nos. 2, 4, and 5) were in the Pawlowice/śląskie voivodship (49°58′ N; 18°43′ E), one (soil sample no. 3) was in Wroclaw (51°18′ N; 17°11′ E), and eight (soil sample nos. 6–13) were in Tarnow (50°35′ N; 16°49′ E). The sampling sites were categorized into two types. Nos. 1–9 were fields with no history of soybean cultivation, and nos. 10–19 were fields with a history of soybean cultivation. All soil samples were stored at 4 °C after collection.
Three cultivars of European soybeans, namely Abelina, Merlin, and Sultana, were used as trap hosts for rhizobial isolation. The surface of the soybean seeds was sterilized by immersion in 70% ethanol for 30 s followed by 3% sodium hypochlorite for 2 min. The seeds were rinsed 4 times with sterilized distilled water and incubated at 28 °C for 2 d. The germinated seedlings were transplanted into 300 mL glass jars containing sterilized vermiculite (Yoshino Gypsum, Tokyo, Japan) mixed with 5 g of the soil sample [16]. After the jars were transferred to the indoor cultivation room, plants were cultivated at 25 °C for 4 weeks under a 16 h light/8 h dark photoperiod. A water content of 60 mL/100 g was maintained in the jars via irrigation with a sterilized nitrogen-free nutrient solution until harvest. The nitrogen-free solution was prepared as described by Artigas-Ramirez et al. (2019) [16]. After 4 weeks, the soybean plants were uprooted from the jars. The roots were washed with tap water, and the root nodules were removed. The detached nodules were surface-sterilized by soaking in 70% ethanol for 1 min and 3% sodium hypochlorite for 2 min. They were washed four times with sterilized distilled water and crushed in 300 µL of 15% glycerol. Then, 10 µL of the suspension was spread on 1.5% yeast extract mannitol agar (YMA) plates [16]. After incubation at 28 °C for 3–10 d, single colonies were selected. Pure colonies were obtained for further assays after several iterations of streaking onto fresh YMA plates. The isolates were used to further evaluate abiotic stress tolerance, genetic characteristics, and symbiotic performance.

4.2. Abiotic Stress Tolerance Assays

Phenotypic characteristics in response to abiotic stress were evaluated to screen for environmentally adaptable Polish strains. The tolerance of the isolated bacteria to low and high temperatures, as well as osmotic and salinity stresses, was assessed. Briefly, 10 µL of the culture was spotted on YMA plates and incubated at 4, 10, 20, 28, 35, and 40 °C for 3–14 d to test temperature stress tolerance abilities [26]. YMA supplemented with 1, 5, 10, or 15% (w/v) mannitol and 0, 1, 2, 3, or 4% (w/v) NaCl was used for the osmotic and salinity stress tolerance tests, respectively [26,64]. The strains were incubated on each plate at 28 °C for 3–14 d. Bacterial growth was evaluated, and the growth on the YMA plates served as a control. The stress tolerance of the strains was scored according to the growth rate of each colony as follows: no growth (–), 10–60% growth compared to the control (+), 60–80% growth compared to the control (++), and 80–100% growth compared to the control (+++).

4.3. Genomic DNA Extraction

Forty-nine strains were selected as the top-performing strains based on their origin and stress tolerance. The isolates were incubated in YM broth at 28 °C for 3–7 d. Before DNA isolation, the cells were washed with phosphate-buffered saline. Total genomic DNA was extracted from the rhizobial cells using a Wizard Genomic DNA Purification Kit (Promega, Madison, WI, USA).

4.4. DNA Amplification and Sequencing of 16S rRNA and Symbiosis-Associated Genes

A PCR amplification and sequencing of the 16S rRNA, nodulation protein D (nodD), and nitrogenase reductase (nifH) gene fragments from the representative 44–49 strains was performed. The 50 μL reaction mixture for PCR amplification included the following components: 2 μL primer sets (10 μM each), 25 μL Taq DNA polymerase Master Mix (GO-Taq, Promega, Madison, WI, USA), and 50–150 ng DNA template. The primer sets and PCR conditions are listed in Table S9 [13,65,66,67]. The nifH genes of some strains were amplified using nested PCR [67]. The 25 μL reaction mixture for nested PCR amplification included the following components: 0.5 μL primer sets (10 μM each), 12.5 μL Taq DNA polymerase Master Mix (GO-Taq, Promega, Madison, WI, USA), and 150 ng DNA template or PCR-first step production. A FastGene Gel/PCR Extraction Kit (Nippon Genetics, Tokyo, Japan) was used to purify the PCR products. Purified DNA fragments were sequenced with primer sets (Table S10) using an ABI Prism 3500 Genetic Analyzer (Applied Biosystems, Waltham, MA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s protocol.
Phylogenetic trees were constructed based on the nucleotide sequences of each strain and compared with the sequences registered in the GenBank nucleotide sequence database using BLAST (v10.2). Multiple sequences were aligned, and phylogenetic trees were established based on maximum composite likelihood analysis using the Tamura–Nei model and bootstrap method with Genetix 11 and MEGA X software (v10.2).

4.5. Multilocus Sequence Typing (MLST)

Based on the stress tolerance and 16S rRNA gene sequencing results, nine strains were selected for further assays in plants. These representative strains were identified and characterized based on the sequencing of four housekeeping genes, namely atpD, recA, glnA, and rpoB, and used for the phylogenetic analysis. The primer sets and PCR conditions are listed in Table S10 [68,69,70,71,72,73]. The composition of the mixture for PCR amplification and the purification of DNA fragments, as well as the methods of sequencing and identification, were the same as those used for the 16S rRNA and nitrogen fixation-associated genes. MLST was performed based on the concatenated sequences of the four genes.

4.6. Plant Inoculation Assay

Nine representative strains were evaluated for their symbiotic performance with soybeans in pot experiments. B. diazoefficiens USDA 110T was used as a positive control for the main statistical and physiological performance analyses. Here, “n.i.” (non-inoculated) served as a negative control and was treated with a sterilized nitrogen-free nutrient solution without any bacterial strain. Three European soybean cultivars (Abelina, Merlin, and Sultana) were used as trap hosts. The seeds were surface-sterilized and germinated as described above. The germinated seedlings were transplanted into 300 mL glass jars containing sterilized vermiculite (Fukushima Vermi, Fukushima, Japan), and 5 mL of each bacterial suspension (108 CFU/mL) was added to each plant. The plants were grown aseptically in a growth chamber under the same conditions as those previously described for the isolation experiments. All treatments were performed in triplicate for each strain. After 4 weeks, all parts of the plants were harvested and used for measurements. Fresh roots with nodules were evaluated for nitrogenase activity using the acetylene reduction assay. The plant roots were incubated in 300 mL glass jars containing 10% acetylene gas (v/v) at 25 °C for 1 h. After incubation, the ethylene concentration in the jar was measured using a Shimadzu GC-2014 gas chromatograph (Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan) equipped with a Porapak-N column (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA). The samples were run in 1 mL for 6 min. Root nodules were removed from each root and counted. The separated shoots, roots, and nodules were dried at 80 °C for 2 d and weighed.
Additionally, pot experiments were performed to simulate the Polish environment, which included cold climates and water deficits. Two representative strains were selected based on plant assays under optimal environmental conditions. Two European soybean cultivars, Abelina and Merlin, were used as trap hosts. As a low-temperature treatment, the plants were grown at 20 °C with light for 16 h and at 10 °C in the dark for 8 h, whereas the standard conditions were maintained at 25 °C at all times. For water-deficient conditions, the plants were cultivated with half the amount of irrigation (30 mL/100 g) of the previous assays. After 6 weeks, the plants were harvested, and the acetylene reduction activity, number of nodules, and biomass were evaluated using the same method. Additionally, nitrogen content was measured using the dried powders of the plant shoots with an NC analyzer (SUMIGRAPH NCTR22, Sumika Chemical Analysis Service Ltd., Tokyo, Japan). All treatments were performed with four replicates for each strain.

4.7. Whole Genome Sequencing of PSN49

Whole genome sequencing of the representative Bradyrhizobium strain, PSN49, was performed. The genomic DNA was extracted using a Wizard Genomic DNA Purification Kit (Promega, Madison, WI, USA). After assessing the quality of the extracted DNA using a Qubit 4 fluorometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) and Femto Pulse System (Agilent, Santa Clara, CA, USA), the sequencing library was prepared via the SMRTbell Prep Kit 3.0 protocol (102-182-700, REV03 MAR2024, Pacific Biosciences, Menlo Park, CA, USA). Revio sequencing was performed using a Revio SMRT Cell tray (PacBio; 102-202-200) and Revio™ Polymerase Kit (PacBio; 102-739-100). After sequencing, bam files were generated with SMRT link v13.1.0.221970 and processed with samtools 1.21 [74]. The sequenced reads were assembled using Flye v.2.9.4 [75] with the default settings, and contigs < 1000 bp were removed using SeqKit v2.6.1 [76]. The genomic sequences were annotated with Prokka v1.14.6 (--rawproduct--mincontiglen 1000) [77] and DDBJ Fast Annotation and Submission Tool and were evaluated with QUAST v.5.0.2 [78] and the CheckM v1.1.3 lineage workflow (-r--ali--genes--tab_table) [79]. Taxonomy identification was performed using GTDB-Tk 2.3.2 [80] with the default option, using the Release214 database. Orthologous genes between the PSN49 and Bradyrhizobium strains were calculated based on OrthoFinder v2.5.5 [81]. A phylogenetic tree of Bradyrhizobium genomes was constructed using UBCG v2 [82]. A heat map for comparison among the proteins in the Bradyrhizobium genomes was created using the Interactive Tree of Life (iTOL) v6 [83].

4.8. Nucleotide Sequence Accession Numbers

DNA sequences were deposited in the DNA Data Bank of Japan (DDBJ) under accession numbers LC765466 to LC765506 and LC765508 to LC765515 for 16S rRNA sequences; LC767878 to LC767888, LC767890, and LC767891 for recA sequences; LC767731 to LC767742, LC767744, and LC767745 for atpD sequences; LC767892 to LC767903, LC767905, and LC767906 for rpoB sequences; LC767746 to LC767757, LC767759, and LC767760 for glnA sequences; LC767645 to LC767684 for nodD sequences; and LC767690 to LC767730 for nifH sequences. Whole genome sequences of PSN49 were CP187249–CP187256. Sequences of reference strains for whole genome analysis were obtained from NCBI database with the following accession numbers: GCF_037623515.1, GCF_000807315.1, GCF_001887695.1, GCF_029892585.1, GCF_021229375.1, GCF_024170805.1, GCF_024171065.1, GCF_000284375.1, GCF_024171145.1, GCF_024170955.1, GCA_024171185.1, GCF_024171225.1, GCF_024171205.1, GCF_024809375.1, GCF_023278185.1, GCF_001642675.1, GCF_000482525.1, GCF_040549625.1, and GCF_002278135.3.

4.9. Statistical Analyses

Data were statistically analyzed using two-tailed Dunnett’s test at p < 0.05 (R v4.3.1) and compared to values for B. diazoefficiens USDA 110T as positive control.

5. Conclusions

In conclusion, we identified promising rhizobial candidates for soybean cultivation in Poland. B. japonicum PMN37 and PSN49 can potentially improve the growth of soybeans exposed to severe environmental conditions. These isolates are expected to acquire broad niches and adapt to the local environment with high competitiveness because they are related to B. japonicum USDA 123. For these strains to be applied in soybean production in Poland, it is necessary to address various problems related to the soil environment, climatic conditions, and increase in final yield. This study provides valuable insights by identifying locally adapted rhizobium material that can be practically applied in soybean cultivation in Poland and elucidating the genetic and historical background of the rhizobium material. We believe that this study will serve as a foundation for technological developments that will revolutionize soybean cultivation in Poland.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/plants14121786/s1, Figure S1: Rhizobia isolation by using Merlin cultivation as a host trap; Figure S2: Phylogenetic tree based on nodD gene sequences of the representative strains; Figure S3: Phylogenetic tree based on the nifH gene sequences of the representative strains; Figure S4: Phylogenetic trees based on the MLST of the promising inoculants; Figure S5: Plant inoculation assay under the cold condition (Merlin); Figure S6: Plant inoculation assay under the water deficient condition (Merlin); Table S1: Number of isolates from Polish soils; Table S2: Phenotypic characterization and 16S rRNA gene identification of 49 representative strains; Table S3: Merlin cultivar inoculation assay for the representative nine strains; Table S4: Sultana cultivar inoculation assay for the representative nine strains; Table S5: Plant inoculation assay for PSN49 under the abiotic stress conditions in Abelina; Table S6: Contigs of PSN49 genome; Table S7: Cold and drought stress-associated genes annotated on the genomes of PSN49 and reference strains; Table S8: Overview and number of copies of Csps on reference rhizobial strains; Table S9: Symbiotic primer sets and PCR condition analysis; Table S10: Primer sets and PCR conditions for identification and MLST.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, R.W., M.D.A.R., M.Y., S.-i.A. and N.O.-O.; methodology, R.W., M.D.A.R. and N.O.-O.; formal analysis, R.W.; investigation, R.W., M.D.A.R. and Y.O.; resources, S.L. and N.O.-O.; data curation, N.O.-O.; writing—original draft preparation, R.W.; writing—review and editing, M.D.A.R., M.Y., S.-i.A., S.D.B.-K., S.L., Y.N. and N.O.-O.; supervision, M.D.A.R., M.Y., S.-i.A., Y.N., H.T. and N.O.-O.; project administration, S.D.B.-K., S.L. and N.O.-O.; funding acquisition, S.D.B.-K., S.L., H.T. and N.O.-O. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by JST-SICORP Concert-Japan [grant number JPMJSC16C2]; JSPS KAKENHI [grant number 20KK0136]; the Cabinet Office, Government of Japan, Moonshot R&D Program for Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries (JPJ009237, funding agency: Bio-oriented Technology Research Advancement Institution); and SusCrop-ERANET [grant number SUSCROP/I/LegumeGap/01/2019].

Data Availability Statement

The datasets generated and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Shin Okazaki and Kun Yuan for their scientific advice.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. He, F.J.; Chen, J.Q. Consumption of soybean, soy foods, soy isoflavones and breast cancer incidence: Differences between Chinese women and women in Western countries and possible mechanisms. Food Sci. Hum. Wellness 2013, 2, 146–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. De Visser, L.C.M.; Schreuder, R.; Stoddard, F. Protein sources in animal feed. Les sources de protéines dans l’alimentation du bétail The EU’s dependency on soya bean import for the animal feed industry and potential for EU produced alternatives. OCL 2014, 21, D407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Biermann, U.; Friedt, W.; Lang, S.; Lühs, W.; Machmüller, G.; Metzger, J.O.; Mark, M.R.; Schäfer, H.J.; Schneider, M.P. New Syntheses with Oils and Fats as Renewable Raw Materials for the Chemical Industry. Biorefineries-Ind. Process. Prod. Status Quo Future Dir. 2008, 2, 253–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Carrera, C.S.; Dardanelli, J.L.; Soldini, D.O. Chemical compounds related to nutraceutical and industrial qualities of non-transgenic soybean genotypes. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2014, 94, 1463–1469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Zaheer, K.; Humayoun Akhtar, M. An updated review of dietary isoflavones: Nutrition, processing, bioavailability and impacts on human health. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2017, 57, 1280–1293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Messina, M. Soy and health update: Evaluation of the clinical and epidemiologic literature. Nutrients 2016, 8, 754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Lewandowska, S.; Michalak, I. Effect of algal extracts on germination ability of different varieties of soybean. Seed and Seedlings. In Proceedings of the XIV Scientific and Technical Seminar, Prague, Czech Republic, 10–14 June 2019; pp. 84–90. [Google Scholar]
  8. Lewandowska, S. Perspectives of Soybean Cultivation in Poland. 2016. Available online: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/304898171_Perspectives_of_soybean_cultivation_in_Poland (accessed on 1 April 2025).
  9. Michalak, I.; Lewandowska, S.; Detyna, J.; Olsztyńska-Janus, S.; Bujak, H.; Pacholska, P. The Effect of Macroalgal Extracts and Near Infrared Radiation on Germination of Soybean Seedlings: Preliminary Research Results. Open Chem. 2018, 16, 1066–1076. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Niwińska, B.; Witaszek, K.; Niedbała, G.; Pilarski, K. Seeds of n-GM soybean varieties cultivated in Poland and their processing products as high-protein feeds in cattle nutrition. Agriculture 2020, 10, 174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Serafin-Andrzejewska, M.; Jama-Rodzeńska, A.; Helios, W.; Kozak, M.; Lewandowska, S.; Zalewski, D.; Kotecki, A. Influence of nitrogen fertilization, seed inoculation and the synergistic effect of these treatments on soybean yields under conditions in south-western Poland. Sci. Rep. 2024, 14, 6672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Miladinovic, J.; Kurosaki, H.; Burton, J.W.; Hrustic, M.; Miladinovic, D. The adaptability of shortseason soybean genotypes to varying longitudinal regions. Eur. J. Agron. 2006, 25, 243–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Risal, C.P.; Yokoyama, T.; Ohkama-Ohtsu, N.; Djedidi, S.; Sekimoto, H. Genetic diversity of native soybean bradyrhizobia from different topographical regions along the southern slopes of the Himalayan Mountains in Nepal. Syst. Appl. Microbiol. 2010, 33, 416–425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Andrews, M.; Andrews, M.E. Specificity in legume-rhizobia symbioses. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2017, 18, 705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. De Meyer, S.E.; Briscoe, L.; Martínez-Hidalgo, P.; Agapakis, C.M.; De-Los Santos, P.E.; Seshadri, R.; Reeve, W.; Weinstock, G.; O’Hara, G.; Howieson, J.G.; et al. Symbiotic Burkholderia species show diverse arrangements of nif/fix and nod genes and lack typical High-Affinity cytochrome cbb3 Oxidase genes. Mol. Plant-Microbe Interact. 2016, 29, 609–619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Ramírez, M.D.A.; España, M.; Aguirre, C.; Kojima, K.; Ohkama-Ohtsu, N.; Sekimoto, H.; Yokoyama, T. Burkholderia and Paraburkholderia are predominant soybean rhizobial genera in venezuelan soils in different climatic and topographical regions. Microbes Environ. 2019, 34, 43–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Roche, P.; Maillet, F.; Plazanet, C.; Debellé, F.; Ferro, M.; Truchet, G.; Promé, J.C.; Dénarié, J. The common nodABC genes of Rhizobium meliloti are host-range determinants. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1996, 93, 15305–15310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Buendía-Clavería, A.M.; Rodriguez-Navarro, D.N.; Santamaría-Linaza, C.; Ruiz-Saínza, J.E.; Temprano-Vera, F. Evaluation of the Symbiotic Properties of Rhizobium fredii in European Soils. Syst. Appl. Microbiol. 1994, 17, 155–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Vinuesa, P.; Rojas-Jiménez, K.; Contreras-Moreira, B.; Mahna, S.K.; Prasad, B.N.; Moe, H.; Selvaraju, S.B.; Thierfelder, H.; Werner, D. Multilocus sequence analysis for assessment of the biogeography and evolutionary genetics of four Bradyrhizobium species that nodulate soybeans on the asiatic continent. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2008, 74, 6987–6996. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Rumjanek, N.G.; Dobert, R.C.; Van Berkum, P.; Triplett, E.W. Common soybean inoculant strains in Brazil are members of Bradyrhizobium elkanii. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1993, 59, 4371–4373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Fatima, Z.; Zia, M.; Chaudhary, M.F. Effect of Rhizobium strains and phosphorus on growth of soybean (Glycine max) and survival of Rhizobium and P solubilizing bacteria. Pak. J. Bot. 2006, 38, 459–464. [Google Scholar]
  22. Liu, H.; Cui, Y.; Zhou, J.; Penttinen, P.; Liu, J.; Zeng, L.; Chen, Q.; Gu, Y.; Zou, L.; Zhao, K.; et al. Nickel mine soil is a potential source for soybean plant growth promoting and heavy metal tolerant rhizobia. PeerJ 2022, 10, e13215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Soulemanov, A.; Prithiviraj, B.; Carlson, R.W.; Jeyaretnam, B.; Smith, D.L. Isolation and characterization of the major nod factor of Bradyrhizobium japonicum strain 532C. Microbiol. Res. 2002, 157, 25–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Melchiorre, M.; de Luca, M.J.; Anta, G.G.; Suarez, P.; Lopez, C.; Lascano, R.; Racca, R.W. Evaluation of Bradyrhizobia strains isolated from field-grown soybean plants in Argentina as improved inoculants. Biol. Fertil. Soils 2011, 47, 81–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Omari, R.A.; Yuan, K.; Anh, K.T.; Reckling, M.; Halwani, M.; Egamberdieva, D.; Ohkama-Ohtsu, N.; Bellingrath-Kimura, S.D. Enhanced Soybean Productivity by Inoculation with Indigenous Bradyrhizobium Strains in Agroecological Conditions of Northeast Germany. Front. Plant Sci. 2022, 12, 707080. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Yuan, K.; Reckling, M.; Ramirez, M.D.A.; Djedidi, S.; Fukuhara, I.; Ohyama, T.; Yokoyama, T.; Bellingrath-Kimura, S.D.; Halwani, M.; Egamberdieva, D.; et al. Characterization of rhizobia for the improvement of soybean cultivation at cold conditions in central Europe. Microbes Environ. 2020, 35, ME19124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Haegele, J.W.; Below, F.E. Transgenic corn rootworm protection increases grain yield and nitrogen use of maize. Crop Sci. 2013, 53, 585–594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. EAG volume 19 issue 4 Cover and Back matter. Exp. Agric. 1983, 19, b1–b8. [CrossRef]
  29. Szczerba, A.; Płażek, A.; Pastuszak, J.; Kopeć, P.; Hornyák, M.; Dubert, F. Effect of low temperature on germination, growth, and seed yield of four soybean (Glycine max L.) cultivars. Agronomy 2021, 11, 800. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Kabała, C.; Charzyński, P.; Chodorowski, J.; Drewnik, M.; Glina, B.; Greinert, A.; Hulisz, P.; Jankowski, M.; Jonczak, J.; Łabaz, B.; et al. Polish soil classification, 6th edition—Principles, classification scheme and correlations. Soil Sci. Annu. 2019, 70, 71–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Soil Survey Division Staff. Soil Survey Manual—Chapter 3 Examination and description of soils. Soil Surv. Man. 1993, 18, 46–155. Available online: http://soils.usda.gov/technical/manual/ (accessed on 1 April 2025).
  32. van Reeuwijk, L.P. Procedures for Soil Analysis; International Soil Reference and Information Centre: Wageningen, The Netherlands, 2002. [Google Scholar]
  33. Griebsch, A.; Matschiavelli, N.; Lewandowska, S.; Schmidtke, K. Presence of Bradyrhizobium sp. Under continental conditions in central europe. Agriculture 2020, 10, 446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Narozna, D.; Pudełko, K.; Króliczak, J.; Golińska, B.; Sugawara, M.; Madrzak, C.J.; Sadowsky, M.J. Survival and competitiveness of Bradyrhizobium japonicum strains 20 years after introduction into field locations in Poland. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2015, 81, 5552–5559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Rong, L.; Chen, H.; Yang, Z.; Yuan, S.; Zhou, X. Research status of soybean symbiosis nitrogen fixation. Oil Crop Sci. 2020, 5, 6–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Rymuza, K.; Radzka, E.; Wysokiński, A. Nitrogen uptake from different sources by Non-GMO soybean varieties. Agronomy 2020, 10, 1219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Thilakarathna, M.S.; Raizada, M.N. A meta-analysis of the effectiveness of diverse rhizobia inoculants on soybean traits under field conditions. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2017, 105, 177–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Caldwell, B.E.; Vest, G. Effects of Rhizobium japonicum Strains on Soybean Yields. Crop Sci. 1970, 10, 19–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Kvien, C.S.; Ham, G.E.; Lambert, J.W. Recovery of Introduced Rhizobium japonicum Strains by Soybean Genotypes 1. Agron. J. 1981, 73, 900–905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Moawad, M.; Schmidt, E.L. Occurrence and nature of mixed infections in nodules of field-grown soybeans (Glycine max). Biol. Fertil. Soils 1987, 5, 112–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Madrzak, C.J.; Golinska, B.; Kroliczak, J.; Pudelko, K.; Lazewska, D.; Lampka, B.; Sadowsky, M.J. Diversity among field populations of Bradyrhizobium japonicum in Poland. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1995, 61, 1194–1200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Streeter, J.G.; Salminen, S.O.; Whitmoyer, R.E.; Carlson, R.W. Formation of novel polysaccharides by Bradyrhizobium japonicum bacteroids in soybean nodules. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1992, 58, 607–613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Shiro, S.; Kuranaga, C.; Yamamoto, A.; Sameshima-Saito, R.; Saeki, Y. Temperature-dependent expression of NODC and community structure of soybean-nodulating Bradyrhizobia. Microbes Environ. 2016, 31, 27–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Barria, C.; Malecki, M.; Arraiano, C.M. Bacterial adaptation to cold. Microbiology 2013, 159 Pt 12, 2437–2443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Zhang, Y.; Gross, C.A. Cold Shock Response in Bacteria. Annu. Rev. Genet. 2021, 55, 377–400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Schindelin, H.; Jiang, W.; Inouye, M.; Heinemann, U. Crystal structure of CspA, the major cold shock protein of Escherichia coli. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1994, 91, 5119–5123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Jiang, W.; Hou, Y.; Inouye, M. CspA, the major cold-shock protein of Escherichia coli, is an RNA chaperone. J. Biol. Chem. 1997, 272, 196–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Phadtare, S.; Severinov, K. Nucleic acid melting by Escherichia coli CspE. Nucleic Acids Res. 2005, 33, 5583–5590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Gualerzi, C.O.; Giuliodori, A.M.; Pon, C.L. Transcriptional and post-transcriptional control of cold-shock genes. J. Mol. Biol. 2003, 331, 527–539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Teana, A.L.A.; Brandi, A.; Falconi, M.; Spurio, R.; Pon, C.L.; Gualerzi, C.O. Identification of a cold shock transcriptional enhancer of the Escherichia coli gene encoding nucleoid protein H-NS. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1991, 88, 10907–10911. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Jones, P.G.; Krah, R.; Tafuri, S.R.; Wolffe, A.P. DNA gyrase, CS7.4, and the cold shock response in Escherichia coli. J. Bacteriol. 1992, 174, 5798–5802. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Zhang, H.; Charles, T.C.; Driscoll, B.T.; Prithiviraj, B.; Smith, D.L. Low temperature-tolerant Bradyrhizobium japonicum strains allowing improved soybean yield in short-season areas. Agron. J. 2002, 94, 870–875. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Zhang, H.; Prithiviraj, B.; Charles, T.C.; Driscoll, B.T.; Smith, D.L. Low temperature tolerant Bradyrhizobium japonicum strains allowing improved nodulation and nitrogen fixation of soybean in a short season (cool spring) area. Eur. J. Agron. 2003, 19, 205–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Wang, J.; Sun, Z.; Liu, H.; Yue, L.; Wang, F.; Liu, S.; Su, B.; Liu, B.; Kong, F.; Fang, C. Genome-Wide Identification and Characterization of the Soybean Snf2 Gene Family and Expression Response to Rhizobia. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 7250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Jiang, X.; Keto-Timonen, R.; Skurnik, M.; Korkeala, H. Role of DEAD-box RNA helicase genes in the growth of Yersinia pseudotuberculosis IP32953 under cold, pH, osmotic, ethanol and oxidative stresses. PLoS ONE 2019, 14, e0219422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Cytryn, E.J.; Sangurdekar, D.P.; Streeter, J.G.; Franck, W.L.; Chang, W.S.; Stacey, G.; Emerich, D.W.; Joshi, T.; Xu, D.; Sadowsky, M.J. Transcriptional and physiological responses of Bradyrhizobium japonicum to desiccation-induced stress. J. Bacteriol. 2007, 189, 6751–6762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Vashisht, A.A.; Tuteja, N. Stress responsive DEAD-box helicases: A new pathway to engineer plant stress tolerance. J. Photochem. Photobiol. B Biol. 2006, 84, 150–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Kim, S.; Ha, J.; Lee, H.; Lee, S.; Lee, J.; Choi, Y.; Oh, H.; Yoon, Y.; Choi, K.H. Role of Pseudomonas aeruginosa DesB in adaptation to osmotic stress. J. Food Prot. 2019, 82, 1278–1282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Aguilar, P.S.; Hernandez-Arriaga, A.M.; Cybulski, L.E.; Erazo, A.C.; De Mendoza, D. Molecular basis of thermosensing: A two-component signal transduction thermometer in bacillus subtilis. EMBO J. 2001, 20, 1681–1691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Sugawara, M.; Cytryn, E.J.; Sadowsky, M.J. Functional role of Bradyrhizobium japonicum trehalose biosynthesis and metabolism genes during physiological stress and nodulation. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2010, 76, 1071–1081. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Streeter, J.G. Effect of trehalose on survival of Bradyrhizobium japonicum during desiccation. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2003, 95, 484–491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Streeter, J.G. Factors affecting the survival of Bradyrhizobium applied in liquid cultures to soya bean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] seeds. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2007, 103, 1282–1290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Streeter, J.G.; Gomez, M.L. Three enzymes for trehalose synthesis in Bradyrhizobium cultured bacteria and in bacteroids from soybean nodules. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2006, 72, 4250–4255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Zézé, A.; Mutch, L.A.; Young, J.P.W. Direct amplification of nodD from community DNA reveals the genetic diversity of Rhizobium leguminosarum in soil. Environ. Microbiol. 2001, 3, 363–370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Laguerre, G.; Nour, S.M.; Macheret, V.; Sanjuan, J.; Drouin, P.; Amarger, N. Classification of rhizobia based on nodC and nifH gene analysis reveals a close phylogenetic relationship among Phaseolus vulgaris symbionts. Microbiology 2001, 147, 981–993. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Widmer, F.; Shaffer, B.T.; Porteous, L.A.; Seidler, R.J. Analysis of nifH gene pool complexity in soil and litter at a douglas fir forest site in the Oregon cascade mountain range. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1999, 65, 374–380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Del Cerro, P.; Megías, M.; López-Baena, F.J.; Gil-Serrano, A.; Pérez-Montaño, F.; Ollero, F.J. Osmotic stress activates nif and fix genes and induces the Rhizobium tropici CIAT 899 Nod factor production via NodD2 by up-regulation of the nodA2 operon and the nodA3 gene. PLoS ONE 2019, 14, e0213298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Gaunt, M.W.; Turner, S.L.; Rigottier-Gois, L.; Lloyd-Macgilp, S.A.; Young, J.P.W. Phylogenies of atpD and recA support the small subunit rRNA-based classification of rhizobia. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2001, 51, 2037–2048. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Payne, G.W.; Vandamme, P.; Morgan, S.H.; LiPuma, J.J.; Coenye, T.; Weightman, A.J.; Jones, T.H.; Mahenthiralingam, E. Development of a recA gene-based identification approach for the entire Burkholderia genus. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2005, 71, 3917–3927. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Martens, M.; Delaere, M.; Coopman, R.; De Vos, P.; Gillis, M.; Willems, A. Multilocus sequence analysis of Ensifer and related taxa. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2007, 57, 489–503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Mohkam, M.; Nezafat, N.; Berenjian, A.; Mobasher, M.A.; Ghasemi, Y. Identification of Bacillus Probiotics Isolated from Soil Rhizosphere Using 16S rRNA, recA, rpoB Gene Sequencing and RAPD-PCR. Probiotics Antimicrob. Proteins 2016, 8, 8–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Nzoué, A.; Miché, L.; Klonowska, A.; Laguerre, G.; de Lajudie, P.; Moulin, L. Multilocus sequence analysis of Bradyrhizobia isolated from Aeschynomene species in Senegal. Syst. Appl. Microbiol. 2009, 32, 400–412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Khamis, A.; Colson, P.; Raoult, D.; La Scola, B. Usefulness of rpoB Gene Sequencing for Identification of Afipia and Bosea Species, Including a Strategy for Choosing Discriminative Partial Sequences. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2003, 69, 6740–6749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Danecek, P.; Bonfield, J.K.; Liddle, J.; Marshall, J.; Ohan, V.; Pollard, M.O.; Whitwham, A.; Keane, T.; McCarthy, S.A.; Davies, R.M. Twelve years of SAMtools and BCFtools. GigaScience 2021, 10, giab008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Kolmogorov, M.; Yuan, J.; Lin, Y.; Pevzner, P.A. Assembly of long, error-prone reads using repeat graphs. Nat. Biotechnol. 2019, 37, 540–546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Shen, W.; Le, S.; Li, Y.; Hu, F. SeqKit: A cross-platform and ultrafast toolkit for FASTA/Q file manipulation. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0163962. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Seemann, T. Prokka: Rapid prokaryotic genome annotation. Bioinformatics 2014, 30, 2068–2069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Mikheenko, A.; Prjibelski, A.; Saveliev, V.; Antipov, D.; Gurevich, A. Versatile genome assembly evaluation with QUAST-LG. Bioinformatics 2018, 34, i142–i150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Parks, D.H.; Imelfort, M.; Skennerton, C.T.; Hugenholtz, P.; Tyson, G.W. CheckM: Assessing the quality of microbial genomes recovered from isolates, single cells, and metagenomes. Genome Res. 2015, 25, 1043–1055. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Chaumeil, P.A.; Mussig, A.J.; Hugenholtz, P.; Parks, D.H. GTDB-Tk: A toolkit to classify genomes with the genome taxonomy database. Bioinformatics 2020, 36, 1925–1927. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Emms, D.M.; Kelly, S. OrthoFinder: Phylogenetic orthology inference for comparative genomics. Genome Biol. 2019, 20, 238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Kim, J.; Na, S.I.; Kim, D.; Chun, J. UBCG2: Up-to-date bacterial core genes and pipeline for phylogenomic analysis. J. Microbiol. 2021, 59, 609–615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Interactive Tree of Life (iTOL) v6: Recent updates to the phylogenetic tree display and annotation tool. Nucleic Acids Res. 2024, 52, W78–W82. [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Soil sampling sites. The red dots indicate sites with a soybean cultivation history; the white dots indicate sites with no soybean history. This map was created using Google-Pro Earth, 2023.
Figure 1. Soil sampling sites. The red dots indicate sites with a soybean cultivation history; the white dots indicate sites with no soybean history. This map was created using Google-Pro Earth, 2023.
Plants 14 01786 g001
Figure 2. Abiotic stress tolerances of native isolates from Poland. Evaluation of stress tolerance of strains for each isolated host plant. Number of strains for each condition that survived in each medium is shown. (a) Cold stress, (b) high-temperature stress, (c) osmotic stress, and (d) salinity stress.
Figure 2. Abiotic stress tolerances of native isolates from Poland. Evaluation of stress tolerance of strains for each isolated host plant. Number of strains for each condition that survived in each medium is shown. (a) Cold stress, (b) high-temperature stress, (c) osmotic stress, and (d) salinity stress.
Plants 14 01786 g002
Figure 3. Phylogenetic clustering tree based on 16S rRNA gene sequences of forty-nine representative strains. Labels show cluster genus distribution of selected isolates. Group I includes Alpha-proteobacteria, and Group II includes Beta-proteobacteria. The length of each sequence is 1366 bp. Tree was constructed using maximum likelihood method. Bootstrap values are shown as percentages from 1000 replicates.
Figure 3. Phylogenetic clustering tree based on 16S rRNA gene sequences of forty-nine representative strains. Labels show cluster genus distribution of selected isolates. Group I includes Alpha-proteobacteria, and Group II includes Beta-proteobacteria. The length of each sequence is 1366 bp. Tree was constructed using maximum likelihood method. Bootstrap values are shown as percentages from 1000 replicates.
Plants 14 01786 g003
Figure 4. The performance of isolates native to Poland using the Abelina cultivar under cold conditions. Four strains were used as the inoculant for Abelina. (a) Plants 6 weeks after inoculation with n.i., USDA 110, PMN37, and PSN49. (b) Shoot dry weight, (c) root dry weight, (d) nodule dry weight, (e) nodule number, (f) nitrogen content in the shoots, (g) SPAD value, and (h) acetylene reduction activity (µmol h−1 g−1 nodule dry weight). “n.i.” indicates non-inoculated plants (negative control). “USDA 110” indicates Bradyrhizobium diazoefficiens USDA 110 (positive control) treatment. The values and error bars represent the mean and standard deviation of four biological replicates. The experiment was repeated independently with consistent results. The results for each strain were compared with those for strain USDA 110 using Dunnett’s test; * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001.
Figure 4. The performance of isolates native to Poland using the Abelina cultivar under cold conditions. Four strains were used as the inoculant for Abelina. (a) Plants 6 weeks after inoculation with n.i., USDA 110, PMN37, and PSN49. (b) Shoot dry weight, (c) root dry weight, (d) nodule dry weight, (e) nodule number, (f) nitrogen content in the shoots, (g) SPAD value, and (h) acetylene reduction activity (µmol h−1 g−1 nodule dry weight). “n.i.” indicates non-inoculated plants (negative control). “USDA 110” indicates Bradyrhizobium diazoefficiens USDA 110 (positive control) treatment. The values and error bars represent the mean and standard deviation of four biological replicates. The experiment was repeated independently with consistent results. The results for each strain were compared with those for strain USDA 110 using Dunnett’s test; * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001.
Plants 14 01786 g004
Figure 5. Plant response to inoculation with Polish isolates under water-deficient conditions. Four strains were used as the inoculant for Abelina. (a) Plants 6 weeks after inoculation with n.i., USDA 110, PMN37, and PSN49. (b) Shoot dry weight, (c) root dry weight, (d) nodule dry weight, (e) nodule number, (f) nitrogen content in shoot, (g) SPAD value, and (h) acetylene reduction activity (µmol h−1 g−1 nodule dry weight). “n.i.” indicates non-inoculated plants (negative control). “USDA 110” indicates Bradyrhizobium diazoefficiens USDA 110 (positive control) treatment. The values and error bars represent the mean and standard deviation of four biological replicates. The experiment was repeated independently with consistent results. The results for each strain were compared with those for strain USDA 110 using Dunnett’s test: * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001.
Figure 5. Plant response to inoculation with Polish isolates under water-deficient conditions. Four strains were used as the inoculant for Abelina. (a) Plants 6 weeks after inoculation with n.i., USDA 110, PMN37, and PSN49. (b) Shoot dry weight, (c) root dry weight, (d) nodule dry weight, (e) nodule number, (f) nitrogen content in shoot, (g) SPAD value, and (h) acetylene reduction activity (µmol h−1 g−1 nodule dry weight). “n.i.” indicates non-inoculated plants (negative control). “USDA 110” indicates Bradyrhizobium diazoefficiens USDA 110 (positive control) treatment. The values and error bars represent the mean and standard deviation of four biological replicates. The experiment was repeated independently with consistent results. The results for each strain were compared with those for strain USDA 110 using Dunnett’s test: * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001.
Plants 14 01786 g005
Figure 6. Genome sequencing of Bradyrhizobium japonicum PSN49. (a) COG of the annotated genes associated with cold and drought stress in PSN49 and Bradyrhizobium strains. USDA 30, Bradyrhizobium diazoefficiens USDA 30; USDA 31, Bradyrhizobium elkanii USDA 31; USDA 110, B. diazoefficiens USDA 110; USDA 6, B. japonicum USDA 6. (b) The identity rates (%) of the annotated proteins associated with cold and drought stress in PSN49 are compared to those in Bradyrhizobium strains using UBCG v2 and BLASTp. Dark green to light green, 55–100% identity; blank, <55% identity.
Figure 6. Genome sequencing of Bradyrhizobium japonicum PSN49. (a) COG of the annotated genes associated with cold and drought stress in PSN49 and Bradyrhizobium strains. USDA 30, Bradyrhizobium diazoefficiens USDA 30; USDA 31, Bradyrhizobium elkanii USDA 31; USDA 110, B. diazoefficiens USDA 110; USDA 6, B. japonicum USDA 6. (b) The identity rates (%) of the annotated proteins associated with cold and drought stress in PSN49 are compared to those in Bradyrhizobium strains using UBCG v2 and BLASTp. Dark green to light green, 55–100% identity; blank, <55% identity.
Plants 14 01786 g006
Table 1. Soil sampling fields and their crop histories.
Table 1. Soil sampling fields and their crop histories.
Soil Sample No.Site NameSoil Sample Collection DateSoil Gravity CategoriesClay
(%)
(<0.02 mm)
Silt
(%)
(0.1–0.02 mm)
Sand
(%)
(1–0.1 mm)
Crop Rotation History
(Winter–Spring–Autumn–Summer)
Soybean Harvest DatepH
1NOWY ROŻNÓW15 November 2019Light394516Spring wheat–oilseed rape–
winter wheat–maize
-6.3
2PAWŁOWICE12 November 2019Light201565Winter oilseed rape–winter wheat–
winter oilseed rape–winter wheat
-7.9
3WROCŁAW14 November 2019Medium251857Oat–winter oilseed rape–winter wheat–winter oilseed rape–winter wheat-6.2
4PAWŁOWICE14 November 2019Medium231562Winter oilseed rape–winter wheat–
winter oilseed rape–winter wheat
-6.5
5PAWŁOWICE21 November 2019Light161470Oat–winter triticale–flax–
winter oilseed rape–winter triticale
-7.6
6TARNÓW26 November 2019Heavy404515Winter wheat–sugar beet–
spring barley–winter oilseed rape
-6.2
7TARNÓW27 November 2019Heavy414811Spring barley–winter oilseed rape–
winter wheat–sugar beet
-6.3
8TARNÓW28 November 2019Heavy434215Sugar beet–spring barley–
winter oilseed rape–winter wheat
-6.1
9TARNÓW26 November 2019Heavy454114Spring barley–vegetable–
spring barley–vegetable
-6.5
10TARNÓW20 November 2019Heavy474310Soybean–winter wheat–
potatoes–soybean
20196.3
11TARNÓW17 November 2019Heavy424711Winter wheat–winter oilseed rape–
winter wheat–soybean
20196.2
12TARNÓW13 November 2019Heavy444214Soybean–spring wheat–
vegetable–winter wheat
20166.1
13TARNÓW8 November 2019Heavy394615Maize–winter wheat–vegetable–
spring wheat–soybean–vegetable–
winter wheat–vegetable
20156.6
14NOWY ROŻNÓW8 November 2019Heavy384715Sugar beet–winter wheat–
oilseed rape–winter wheat–
soybean–maize–spring wheat
20176.5
15NOWY ROŻNÓW5 November 2019Heavy365113Sugar beet–winter wheat–
oilseed rape–winter wheat–
soybean–maize–spring wheat
20166.4
16NOWY ROŻNÓW6 November 2019Heavy374914Sugar beet–winter wheat–oilseed rape–
winter wheat–soybean
20196.7
17NOWY ROŻNÓW6 November 2019Heavy384814Sugar beet–winter wheat–oilseed rape–
winter wheat–soybean–maize
20186.5
18NOWE GOLUSZOWICE7 November 2019Heavy364123Winter wheat–oilseed rape–
winter wheat–soybean
20196.7
19NOWY ROŻNÓW4 November 2019Heavy384220Winter wheat–oilseed rape–
winter wheat–soybean
20196.5
These soil values are based on Kabala et al., 2019 [30]; Soil Survey Division Staff, 1993 [31]. The pH method was measured as described by van Reeuwijk, 2002 [32]. Here, “-“ indicates fields without a soybean history.
Table 2. Poland cultivar inoculation assays for nine representative strains.
Table 2. Poland cultivar inoculation assays for nine representative strains.
StrainClassification Based on MLSTWhole Plant Dry Weight (g)Shoot Dry Weight (g)Root Dry Weight (g)Number of NodulesNodule Dry Weight (g)ARA (/Nodule DW)ARA (/Plant DW)
Non-inoculation (negative control)0.966 ± 0.147 *0.628 ± 0.064 **0.338 ± 0.0220.00-0.000.00
USDA 110 (positive control)1.643 ± 0.1561.352 ± 0.0770.291 ± 0.01933.00 ± 4.730.056 ± 0.00316.40 ± 2.260.57 ± 0.12
PAN18Bradyrhizobium japonicum1.684 ± 0.1721.326 ± 0.0920.358 ± 0.02739.67 ± 8.410.094 ± 0.0198.04 ± 1.610.47 ± 0.15
PMN30Bradyrhizobium japonicum1.379 ± 0.2721.045 ± 0.1210.334 ± 0.04049.67 ± 9.400.088 ± 0.0117.88 ± 0.150.50 ± 0.02
PMN35Bradyrhizobium japonicum1.604 ± 0.2171.238 ± 0.1130.366 ± 0.01547.00 ± 3.460.116 ± 0.004 *7.85 ± 1.760.58 ± 0.16
PMN37Bradyrhizobium japonicum1.749 ± 0.2261.297 ± 0.1130.453 ± 0.018 *51.67 ± 3.180.123 ± 0.015 **9.11 ± 2.060.66 ± 0.20
PSN49Bradyrhizobium japonicum1.921 ± 0.5291.433 ± 0.2190.489 ± 0.090 **37.67 ± 3.330.108 ± 0.01611.16 ± 3.320.58 ± 0.08
PAT4Rhizobium sp.1.583 ± 0.0781.163 ± 0.0600.420 ± 0.02045.67 ± 7.510.087 ± 0.02721.14 ± 9.830.85 ± 0.19
PAN13Rhizobium sp.1.620 ± 0.3511.221 ± 0.1630.399 ± 0.04046.67 ± 1.670.103 ± 0.0117.35 ± 1.300.47 ± 0.06
PMN31Rhizobium sp.1.122 ± 0.2500.830 ± 0.118 *0.292 ± 0.02759.00 ± 6.030.089 ± 0.01114.14 ± 3.701.09 ± 0.24
PAN21Ensifer sp.1.013 ± 0.145 *0.748 ± 0.040 **0.265 ± 0.05475.33 ± 10.17 **0.049 ± 0.00312.22 ± 2.640.58 ± 0.09
ARA represents acetylene reduction activity, reported as µmol h−1 g−1 nodule dry weight. USDA 110 is Bradyrhizobium diazoefficiens USDA 110T. Results for each strain were compared with those for USDA 110 using Dunnett’s test; * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01.
Table 3. Overview of the PSN49 genome.
Table 3. Overview of the PSN49 genome.
StrainBradyrhizobium japonicum PSN49Bradyrhizobium japonicum USDA 123Bradyrhizobium japonicum USDA 6TBradyrhizobium diazoefficiens USDA 110T
Total length11,082,92210,457,6659,207,3849,106,064
GC (%)63.2363.2763.6764.06
CDS10,93110,25384218586
rRNA6363
tRNA61595855
Accession numberCP187249–CP187256GCA_000482525.1GCA_000284375.1GCA_001642675.1
OrthoANI value (%) to USDA 12399.77---
OrthoANI value (%) to USDA 695.4695.40--
OrthoANI value (%) to USDA 11089.5389.4090.15-
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Watanabe, R.; Artigas Ramirez, M.D.; Agake, S.-i.; Bellingrath-Kimura, S.D.; Lewandowska, S.; Onishi, Y.; Nishikawa, Y.; Takeyama, H.; Yasuda, M.; Ohkama-Ohtsu, N. Genetic Characterization and Symbiotic Performance of Soybean Rhizobia Under Cold and Water-Deficient Conditions in Poland. Plants 2025, 14, 1786. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants14121786

AMA Style

Watanabe R, Artigas Ramirez MD, Agake S-i, Bellingrath-Kimura SD, Lewandowska S, Onishi Y, Nishikawa Y, Takeyama H, Yasuda M, Ohkama-Ohtsu N. Genetic Characterization and Symbiotic Performance of Soybean Rhizobia Under Cold and Water-Deficient Conditions in Poland. Plants. 2025; 14(12):1786. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants14121786

Chicago/Turabian Style

Watanabe, Riku, Maria Daniela Artigas Ramirez, Shin-ichiro Agake, Sonoko Dorothea Bellingrath-Kimura, Sylwia Lewandowska, Yuki Onishi, Yohei Nishikawa, Haruko Takeyama, Michiko Yasuda, and Naoko Ohkama-Ohtsu. 2025. "Genetic Characterization and Symbiotic Performance of Soybean Rhizobia Under Cold and Water-Deficient Conditions in Poland" Plants 14, no. 12: 1786. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants14121786

APA Style

Watanabe, R., Artigas Ramirez, M. D., Agake, S.-i., Bellingrath-Kimura, S. D., Lewandowska, S., Onishi, Y., Nishikawa, Y., Takeyama, H., Yasuda, M., & Ohkama-Ohtsu, N. (2025). Genetic Characterization and Symbiotic Performance of Soybean Rhizobia Under Cold and Water-Deficient Conditions in Poland. Plants, 14(12), 1786. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants14121786

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop