Sugar Content in Arbutus unedo L. Fruit and Its Relationship with Climatic and Edaphic Characteristics
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Results
2.1. Analysis of Fruit Sugar Content of Accessions from Different Provenances
2.2. Sugar Content and Its Relation to Climatic Classifications and Edaphic Characteristics
3. Materials and Methods
3.1. Characterization of Accession Prospecting Sites/Provenances
3.2. Methodology for Sugar Contents Analysis
3.3. Data Processing and Statistical Analysis
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Miguel, M.G.; Faleiro, M.L.; Guerreiro, A.C.; Antunes, M.D. Arbutus unedo L.: Chemical and Biological Properties. Molecules 2014, 19, 15799–15823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Oliveira, I.; Baptista, P.; Bento, A.; Pereira, J.A. Arbutus unedo L. and Its Benefits on Human Health. J. Food Nutr. Res. 2011, 50, 73–85. [Google Scholar]
- Salem, I.B.; Ouesleti, S.; Mabrouk, Y.; Landolsi, A.; Saidi, M.; Boulilla, A. Exploring the Nutraceutical Potential and Biological Activities of Arbutus unedo L. (Ericaceae) Fruits. Ind. Crops Prod. 2018, 122, 726–731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fortalezas, S.; Tavares, L.; Pimpão, R.; Tyagi, M.; Pontes, V.; Alves, P.M.; Mcdougall, G.; Stewart, D.; Ferreira, R.B.; Santos, C.N. Antioxidant Properties and Neuroprotective Capacity of Strawberry Tree Fruit (Arbutus unedo). Nutrients 2010, 2, 214–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Hileman, L.C.; Vasey, M.C.; Thomas Parker, V. Phylogeny and Biogeography of the Arbutoideae (Ericaceae): Implications for the Madrean-Tethyan Hypothesis. Syst. Bot. 2001, 26, 131–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Torres, J.A.; Valle, F.; Pinto, C.; Garcia-Fuentes, A.; Salazar, C.; Cano, E. Arbutus unedo Communities in Southern Iberian Peninsula Mountains. Plant Ecol. 2002, 160, 207–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Konstantinidis, P.; Tsiourlis, G.; Xofis, P. Effect of Fire Season, Aspect and Pre-Fire Plant Size on the Growth of Arbutus unedo L. (Strawberry Tree) Resprouts. For. Ecol. Manag. 2006, 225, 359–367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gomes, B.; Castro, F.; Santos, R.; Figueiredo, P.; Silva, M.; Vidal, M.; Ferreira, I.; Nunes, J.; Machado, H.; Gomes, F. Effect of Quercetin on Mycorrhizal Synthesis between Tuber borchii and Arbutus unedo L. In Vitro Plants. Microbiol. Res. 2021, 12, 69–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Richard, F.; Selosse, M.-A.; Gardes, M. Facilitated Establishment of Quercus Ilex in Shrub-Dominated Communities within a Mediterranean Ecosystem: Do Mycorrhizal Partners Matter? FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 2009, 68, 14–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Azcón-Aguilar, C.; Palenzuela, J.; Roldán, A.; Bautista, S.; Vallejo, R.; Barea, J.M. Analysis of the Mycorrhizal Potential in the Rhizosphere of Representative Plant Species from Desertification-Threatened Mediterranean Shrublands. Appl. Soil Ecol. 2003, 22, 29–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Arnan, X.; Quevedo, L.; Rodrigo, A. Forest Fire Occurrence Increases the Distribution of a Scarce Forest Type in the Mediterranean Basin. Acta Oecologica 2013, 46, 39–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Oliveira, A.S.; Silva, J.S.; Guiomar, N.; Fernandes, P.; Nereu, M.; Gaspar, J.; Lopes, R.F.R.; Rodrigues, J.P.C. The Effect of Broadleaf Forests in Wildfire Mitigation in the WUI—A Simulation Study. Int. J. Disaster Risk Reduct. 2023, 93, 103788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Floris, I.; Satta, A.; Ruiu, L. Honeys of Sardinia (Italy). J. Apic. Res. 2007, 46, 198–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Botelho, G.; Gomes, F.; Ferreira, F.M.; Caldeira, I. Influence of Maturation Degree of Arbutus (Arbutus unedo L.) Fruits in Spirit Composition and Quality. Int. Sch. Sci. Res. Innov. 2015, 9, 615–620. [Google Scholar]
- Ulloa, P.A.; Maia, M.; Brigas, A.F. Physicochemical Parameters and Bioactive Compounds of Strawberry Tree (Arbutus unedo L.) Honey. J. Chem. 2015, 2015, 602792. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pallauf, K.; Rivas-Gonzalo, J.C.; Del Castillo, M.D.; Cano, M.P.; Pascual-Teresa, S. Characterization of the Antioxidant Composition of Strawberry Tree (Arbutus unedo L.) Fruits. J. Food Compos. Anal. 2008, 21, 273–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tavares, L.; Fortalezaa, S.; Carrilho, C.; McDougall, G.J.; Stewart, D.; Ferreira, R.B.; Santos, C. Antioxidant and Antiproliferative Properties of Strawberry Tree Tissues. J. Berry Res. 2010, 1, 3–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Scarano, P.; Guida, R.; Zuzolo, D.; Tartaglia, M.; Prigioniero, A.; Postiglione, A.; Pinto, G.; Illiano, A.; Amoresano, A.; Schicchi, R.; et al. An Endemic Plant of the Mediterranean Area: Phytochemical Characterization of Strawberry Tree (Arbutus unedo L.) Fruits Extracts at Different Ripening Stages. Front. Nutr. 2022, 9, 915994. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Izcara, S.; Morante-Zarcero, S.; Casado, N.; Sierra, I. Study of the Phenolic Compound Profile of Arbutus unedo L. Fruits at Different Ripening Stages by HPLC-TQ-MS/MS. Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, 11616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ramires, F.A.; Durante, M.; D’Antuono, I.; Garbetta, A.; Bruno, A.; Tarantini, A.; Gallo, A.; Cardinali, A.; Bleve, G. Novel Fermentation Strategies of Strawberry Tree Arbutus unedo Fruits to Obtain High Nutritional Value Products. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25, 684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Fonseca, D.F.S.; Salvador, Â.C.; Santos, S.A.O.; Vilela, C.; Freire, C.S.R.; Silvestre, A.J.D.; Rocha, S.M. Bioactive Phytochemicals from Wild Arbutus unedo L. Berries from Different Locations in Portugal: Quantification of Lipophilic Components. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2015, 16, 14194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Selen Isbilir, S.; Hulya Orak, H.; Yagar, H.; Ekinci, N. Determination of Antioxidant Activities of Strawberry Tree (Arbutus unedo L.) Flowers and Fruits at Different Ripening Satges. Acta Sci. Pol. Hortorum Cultus 2012, 11, 223–237. [Google Scholar]
- Ruiz-Rodríguez, B.M.; Morales, P.; Fernández-Ruiz, V.; Sánchez-Mata, M.C.; Cámara, M.; Díez-Marqués, C.; Pardo-de-Santayana, M.; Molina, M.; Tardío, J. Valorization of Wild Strawberry-Tree Fruits (Arbutus unedo L.) through Nutritional Assessment and Natural Production Data. Food Res. Int. 2011, 44, 1244–1253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vidrih, R.; Hribar, J.; Prgomet, Ž.; Ulrih, N.P. The Physico-Chemical Properties of Strawberry Tree (Arbutus unedo L.) Fruits. Croat. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2013, 5, 29–33. [Google Scholar]
- Boussalah, N.; Boussalah, D.; Cebadera-Miranda, L.; Fernández-Ruiz, V.; Barros, L.; Ferreira, I.C.F.R.; Cortes Sanchez Mata, M.; Madani, K. Nutrient Composition of Algerian Strawberry-Tree Fruits (Arbutus unedo L.). Fruits 2018, 73, 283–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gomes, F.; Franco, J.; Pato, R.L.; Botelho, G.; Rodrigues, I.; Figueiredo, P.; Casau, F. Produção de Medronho Para Destilar. In Medronheiro, Caderno Técnico; Pestana, M., Ed.; INIAV, Silva Lusitana: Lisboa, Portugal, 2017; pp. 5–33. ISBN 978-972-579-045. [Google Scholar]
- Ayaz, F.A.; Kucukislamoglu, M.; Reunanen, M. Sugar, Non-Volatile and Phenolic Acids Composition of Strawberry Tree (Arbutus unedo L. Var.Ellipsoidea) Fruits. J. Food Compos. Anal. 2000, 13, 171–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Seker, M.; Toplu, C. Determination and Comparison of Chemical Characteristics of Arbutus unedo L. and Arbutus Andrachnae L. (Family Ericaceae) Fruits. J. Med. Food 2010, 13, 1013–1018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Alarcão e Silva, M.L.; Leitão, A.E.; Azinheira, H.G.; Leitão, M.C. The Arbutus Berry: Studies on Its Color and Chemical Characteristics at Two Mature Stages. J. Food Comp. Anal. 2001, 14, 27–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ait Lhaj, Z.; Bchitou, R.; Gaboun, F.; Abdelwahd, R.; Benabdelouahab, T.; Kabbour, M.R.; Pare, P.; Diria, G.; Bakhy, K. Moroccan Strawberry Tree (Arbutus unedo L.) Fruits: Nutritional Value and Mineral Composition. Foods 2021, 10, 2263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Doukani, K.; Tabak, S. Profil Physicochimique Du Fruit “Lendj” (Arbutus unedo L.). Nat. Technol. B Sci. Agron. Biol. 2015, 12, 51–64. [Google Scholar]
- Özcan, M.M.; Haciseferogullan, H. The Strawberry (Arbutus unedo L.) Fruits: Chemical Composition, Physical Properties and Mineral Contents. J. Food Eng. 2007, 78, 1022–1028. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Oliveira, I.; Pinho, P.G.; Malheiro, R.; Baptista, P.; Pereira, J.A. Volatile Profile of Arbutus unedo L. Fruits through Ripening Stage. Food Chem. 2011, 128, 667–673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Celikel, G.; Demirsoy, L.; Demirsoy, H. The Strawberry Tree (Arbutus unedo L.) Selection in Turkey. Sci. Hort. 2008, 118, 115–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Oliveira, I.; Baptista, P.; Malheiro, R.; Casal, S.; Bento, A.; Pereira, J.A. Influence of Strawberry Tree (Arbutus unedo L.) Fruit Ripening Stage on Chemical Composition and Antioxidant Activity. Food Res. Int. 2011, 44, 1401–1407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Marques, M.P.; Martin, D.; Bosch, M.; Martins, J.; Biswal, A.; Zuzarte, M.; de Carvalho, L.B.; Canhoto, J.; da Costa, R. Unveiling the Compositional Remodelling of Arbutus unedo L. Fruits during Ripening. Sci. Hortic. 2022, 303, 111248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Morales, D. Use of Strawberry Tree (Arbutus unedo) as a Source of Functional Fractions with Biological Activities. Foods 2022, 11, 3838. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Botelho, G.; Anjos, O.; Estevinho, L.M.; Caldeira, I. Methanol in Grape Derived, Fruit and Honey Spirits: A Critical Review on Source, Quality Control, and Legal Limits. Processes 2020, 8, 1609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Galego, L.; Botelho, G.; Da Silva, J.P. Arbutus unedo L. Fruit Distillates and the Requirement for Further Quality Specifications. In Proceedings of the 12th Meeting on Food Chemistry, Lisboa, Portugal, 10–12 September 2014; p. 191. [Google Scholar]
- Caldeira, I.; Gomes, F.; Mira, H.; Botelho, G. Distillates Composition Obtained of Fermented Arbutus unedo L. Fruits from Different Seedlings and Clonal Plants. Ann. Agric. Sci. 2019, 64, 21–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Franco, J. O Medronho—Da Planta Ao Fruto, as Práticas Culturais. Actas Port. Hortic. Jorn. Medronho 2012, 22, 18–25. [Google Scholar]
- Šic Žlabur, J.; Bogdanović, S.; Voća, S.; Skendrović Babojelić, M. Biological Potential of Fruit and Leaves of Strawberry Tree (Arbutus unedo L.) from Croatia. Molecules 2020, 25, 5102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Pato, R.L.; Botelho, G.; Franco, J.; Santos, S.; Ressurreição, S.; Figueiredo, P.; Gama, J.; Gomes, F. Interaction between Farming Type, Nutrient Uptake and Plant Material in Strawberry Tree Fruit Production and Quality. In Proceedings of the Acta Horticulturae; International Society for Horticultural Science (ISHS), Leuven, Belgium, 31 January 2022; pp. 275–284. [Google Scholar]
- Soares da Silva, A.M. Carta Litológica—Notícia Explicativa I.13; Comissão Nacional do Ambiente: Lisboa, Portugal, 1983. [Google Scholar]
- IUSS Working Group WRB World Reference Base for Soil Resources. International Soil Classification System for Naming Soils and Creating Legends for Soil Maps, 4th ed.; International Union of Soil Sciences (IUSS): Vienna, Austria, 2022. [Google Scholar]
- Cardoso, J.C.; Bessa, M.T.; Marado, M.B. Carta Dos Solos de Portugal (1: 1,000,000). Sep. Agron. Lusit. 1973, 33, 481–602. [Google Scholar]
- INMG. O Clima de Portugal. Normais Climatológicas Correspondentes a 1951–1980 (1a, 2a, 3a e 4a Regiões); INMG: Lisboa, Portugal, 1991. [Google Scholar]
- Alcoforado, M.J.; Alegria, M.F.; Ramos-Pereira, A.; Sirgado, C. Domínios Bioclimáticos Em Portugal Definidos Por Comparação Dos Índices de Gaussen e de Emberger, 3rd ed.; Centro de Estudos Geográficos Universidade de Lisboa: Lisboa, Portugal, 2009; ISBN 9789726361930. [Google Scholar]
- Thornthwaite, C.W. An Approach toward a Rational Classification of Climate. Geogr. Rev. 1948, 38, 55–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- ICNF 6o. Inventário Florestal Nacional. 2015 Relatório Final; ICNF, Ed.; ICNF: Lisboa, Portugal, 2019. [Google Scholar]
- ICNF 6o. Inventário Florestal Nacional, Áreas Dos Usos Do Solo e Das Espécies Florestais de Portugal Continental. Resultados Preliminares; Instituto da Conservação da Natureza e das Florestas: Lisboa, Portugal, 2013. [Google Scholar]
- Oliveira, A.S.; Silva, J.S.; Gaspar, J.; Guiomar, N.; Fernandes, P. Is Native Forest an Alternative to Prevent Wildfire in the WUI in Central Is Native Forest an Alternative to Prevent Wildfire in the WUI in Central Portugal? In Geografia, Riscos e Proteção Civil. Homenagem ao Professor Doutor Luciano Lourenço; Nunes, A., Amaro, A., Vieira, A., Castro, F.V., Félix, F., Eds.; Associação Portuguesa de Riscos, Prevenção e Segurança: Vilarinho, Portugal, 2021; Volume 2, ISBN 9789899053052. [Google Scholar]
- INIAV. Plano Nacional Para Os Recursos Genéticos Vegetais; Ministério da Agricultura e do Mar, Ed.; INIAV: Lisboa, Portugal, 2015. [Google Scholar]
- Santo, D.E.; Galego, L.; Gonçalves, T.; Quintas, C. Yeast Diversity in the Mediterranean Strawberry Tree (Arbutus unedo L.) Fruits’ Fermentations. Food Res. Int. 2012, 47, 45–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ribeiro, M.M.; Piotti, A.; Ricardo, A.; Gaspar, D.; Costa, R.; Parducci, L.; Vendramin, G.G. Genetic Diversity and Divergence at the Arbutus unedo L. (Ericaceae) Westernmost Distribution Limit. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0175239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Gomes, F.; Costa, R.; Ribeiro, M.M.; Figueiredo, E.; Canhoto, J.M. Analysis of Genetic Relationship among Arbutus unedo L. Genotypes Using RAPD and SSR Markers. J. For. Res. 2013, 24, 227–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gomes, F.; Simões, M.; Lopes, M.L.; Canhoto, J.M. Effect of Plant Growth Regulators and Genotype on the Micropropagation of Adult Trees of Arbutus unedo L. (Strawberry Tree). New Biotechnol. 2010, 27, 882–892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Gomes, F.; Gama, J.; Figueiredo, P.; Clemente, M.; Plácito, F.; Pato, R.L.; Botelho, G.; Franco, J.; Nazaré, N.; Guilherme, R.; et al. Avaliação de Clones de Arbutus unedo L.: Apresentação de Resultados. In Proceedings of the II Jornadas do Medronho; Gomes, F., Sousa, R.M., Guilherme, R., Eds.; Actas Portuguesas de Horticultura: Coimbra, Portugal, 2015; Volume 24, pp. 15–23. [Google Scholar]
- Nunes, A.S.; Castro, F.; Simões, M.; Botelho, G.; Gomes, F.; Franco, J. Caracterização Dos Estados Fenológicos e Da Produção de Clones de Medronheiro. Actas Port. Hortic. 2022, 35, 27–34. [Google Scholar]
- Thornthwaite, C.W.; Mather, J.R. The Water Balance. In Publications in Climatology; Drexel Institute of Technology: Philadelphia, PA, USA, 1955; Volume 8, pp. 5–86. [Google Scholar]
- Bento, V.A.; Russo, A.; Vieira, I.; Gouveia, C.M. Identification of Forest Vulnerability to Droughts in the Iberian Peninsula. Theor. Appl. Climatol. 2023, 152, 559–579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jafari, M.; Tavili, A.; Panahi, F.; Zandi Esfahan, E.; Ghorbani, M. Chapter 1 Introduction. In Reclamation of Arid Lands; Jafari, M., Tavili, A., Panahi, F., Zandi Esfahan, E., Ghorbani, M., Eds.; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2018; pp. 1–19. ISBN 978-3-319-54828-9. [Google Scholar]
- Nunes, A.S.; Castro, F.; Simões, M.; Gomes, F.; Botelho, G.; Franco, J. AGROTEC Revista Técnico-Científica Agrícola No 34. Suplemento Pequenos Frutos; Publindustria: Porto, Portugal, 2020; pp. 4–6. [Google Scholar]
- Fleckinger, J. Notations Phénologiques et Représentations Graphiques Du Dévelopment Des Bourgeons de Poirier. In Proceedings of the Congrès de Paris de L’Association française pour l’avancement des Sciences, Paris, France; 1945; p. 118. [Google Scholar]
- Baggiolini, M. Les Stades Repères Dans Le Développement Annuel de La Vigne et Leur Utilisation Pratique. Rev. Rom. Agric. 1952, 8, 4–6. [Google Scholar]
- Anastácio, J. Contributo Para o Estudo Do Medronheiro (Arbutus unedo L.): Caracterização Morfológica de Clones e Fisiologia Pós-Colheita Do Fruto. Master’s Thesis, Agricultural Engineering, Instituto Superior de Agronomia, Lisboa, Portugal, 2014. [Google Scholar]
- Miller, J.N.; Miller, J.C. Statistics and Chemometrics for Analytical Chemistry, 5th ed.; Pearson Education Limited: Edinburgh, Scotland, 2005; ISBN 0-131-29192-0. [Google Scholar]
- Caldeira, I.; Gomes, F.; Botelho, G. Arbutus unedo L. Spirit: Does the Water Addition Before Fermentation Matters? In INCREaSE; Mortal, A., Aníbal, J., Monteiro, J., Sequeira, C., Semião, J., da Silva, M.M., Oliveira, M., Eds.; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2018; pp. 206–215. ISBN 978-3-319-70271-1. [Google Scholar]
- Molina, M.; Pardo-De-Santayana, M.; Aceituno, L.; Morales, R.; Tardio, J. Fruit Production of Strawberry Tree (Arbutus unedo L.) in Two Spanish Forests. Forestry 2011, 84, 419–429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Duarte, R.; Castro, F.; Ramos, I.; Antunes, C.; Figueiredo, P.; Franco, J.; Gama, J.D.; Silva, J.P.; Balseiro, M.; Chá, L.C.; et al. Apresentação de Resultados de Ensaios Instalados No Campo Com Plantas Clonais e Seminais de Medronheiro. In Proceedings of the Congresso Nacional dos Recursos Silvestres 2023; Escola Superior Agrária de Bragança: Bragança, Portugal, 2023; p. 37. [Google Scholar]
Local/Provenance | N | Maltose | Sucrose | Glucose | Fructose | Reducing Sugar | Total Sugar |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
(Mean ± SE g/100 g, Fresh Pulp Fruit) | |||||||
TM-Fisgas Ermelo | 6 | 0.87 ± 0.30 d | 0.00 ± 0.00 c | 4.33 ± 0.10 bcd | 8.66 ± 0.43 def | 13.86 ± 0.71 cde | 13.86 ± 0.71 de |
TM-Mosteiró | 19 | 1.24 ± 0.23 cd | 0.12 ± 0.07 b | 3.98 ± 0.11 cd | 8.54 ± 0.32 ef | 13.77 ± 0.55 de | 13.89 ± 0.58 e |
São Mamede | 26 | 0.63 ± 0.13 d | 0.85 ± 0.11 b | 5.13 ± 0.55 bcd | 10.42 ± 1.14 cdef | 16.18 ± 1.76 de | 17.04 ± 1.81 de |
Penamacor | 24 | 0.61 ± 0.14 d | 0.74 ± 0.12 b | 5.14 ± 0.22 bc | 11.70 ± 0.39 bcd | 17.45 ± 0.58 cd | 18.19 ± 0.63 cd |
Penha Garcia * | 2 | 0.00 ± 0.00 e | 0.00 ± 0.00 c | 4.13 ± 0.04 bcd | 12.26 ± 0.20 abcd | 16.39 ± 0.16 bcd | 16.39 ± 0.16 abcd |
Cadaval * | 4 | 0.81 ± 0.27 d | 0.45 ± 0.45 ab | 4.72 ± 0.29 bcd | 12.16 ± 0.61 abcd | 17.70 ± 1.03 abcd | 18.15 ± 0.73 abcd |
Monchiqu e * | 25 | 0.67 ± 0.13 d | 1.58 ± 0.15 a | 6.80 ± 0.26 a | 12.29 ± 0.61 abcd | 19.77 ± 0.88 abc | 21.34 ± 0.97 ac |
ODM-Pomba * | 16 | 2.08 ± 0.16 bc | 0.16 ± 0.09 b | 4.91 ± 0.28 bcd | 12.66 ± 0.60 abc | 19.65 ± 0.86 abc | 19.81 ± 0.89 abcd |
ODM-Cerca Pomares * | 3 | 0.96 ± 0.50 cd | 0.32 ± 0.32 b | 3.77 ± 0.11 bcd | 10.82 ± 0.06 bcd | 15.54 ± 0.43 bcd | 15.86 ± 0.61 bcd |
ODM-Trancão * | 9 | 2.06 ± 0.30 bc | 0.32 ± 0.16 b | 4.16 ± 0.30 bcd | 11.31 ± 0.61 bcd | 17.54 ± 0.85 bcd | 17.85 ± 0.88 bcd |
ODM-Nave Redondo * | 10 | 3.30 ± 0.96 ab | 0.66 ± 0.36 ab | 6.03 ± 0.40 ab | 15.33 ± 1.28 ab | 24.66 ± 1.63 ab | 25.31 ± 1.57 ab |
ODM–Cortes Pereira * | 15 | 3.73 ± 0.53 a | 0.51 ± 0.17 b | 5.82 ± 0.39 ab | 17.01 ± 1.46 a | 26.56 ± 2.31 a | 27.07 ± 2.30 a |
Caldeirão | 25 | 0.41 ± 0.12 d | 0.97 ± 0.14 ab | 4.93 ± 0.11 b-d | 11.78 ± 0.33 b-d | 17.12 ± 0.43 cd | 18.08 ± 0.45 cd |
Barrocal | 20 | 1.02 ± 0.15 d | 0.39 ± 0.14 b | 4.03 ± 0.25 cd | 7.89 ± 0.55 f | 12.95 ± 0.79 e | 13.34 ± 0.84 e |
Total/Global mean | 204 | 1.25 ± 0.10 | 0.67 ± 0.05 | 5.07 ± 0.11 | 11.49 ± 0.28 | 17.81 ± 0.43 | 18.47 ± 0.44 |
Local/Provenance | N | Lithology 1 | pH 2 | T annual (°C) 3 | P annual (mm) 3 | Humidity Index | Xeroth. Index | Climatic Classification 4 | Climatic Classif. 5 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TM-Fisgas Ermelo/FE | 6 | Shales, Quarzites | 2 | 13.4 | 1390.5 | 111.51 | 42.40 | Sub-Mediterranean | B4 B′2 s a′ |
TM-Mosteiró | 19 | Shales | 3 | 13.4 | 1128.1 | 84.69 | 60.96 | Attenuated Mesomed 4.1 | B3 B′2 s2 a′ |
São Mamede | 26 | Shales, Sandst. 1.1 | 2 | 15.2 | 852.4 | 45.41 | 71.38 | Attenuated Mesomed 4.1 | B1 B′2 s2 a′ |
Penamacor | 24 | Shales, Quarzites | 2 | 14.4 | 838.2 | 47.80 | 98.64 | Accentuated Mesomed 4.1 | B1 B′2 s2 a′ |
Penha Garcia * | 2 | Shales | 3 | 14.4 | 838.2 | 47.80 | 98.64 | Accentuated Mesomed 4.1 | B1 B′2 s2 a′ |
Cadaval * | 4 | Gonglomerates 1.2 Sand 1.1 | 3 | 15.0 | 777.6 | 40.20 | 86.64 | Accentuated Mesomed 4.1 | C2 B′2 s a′ |
Monchique * | 25 | Syenite & Shale | 2 | 15.1 | 949.0 | 60.22 | 87.36 | Accentuated Mesomed 4.1 | B1 B′2 s2 a′ |
ODM-Pomba * | 16 | Shale, graywacke | 3 | 15.8 | 715.7 | 34.27 | 87.52 | Accentuated Mesomed 4.1 | C2 B′2 s2 a′ |
ODM-Cerca Pomares * | 3 | Shale, graywacke | 3 | 15.0 | 760.5 | 35.69 | 88.96 | Accentuated Mesomed 4.1 | C2 B′2 s a′ |
ODM-Trancão * | 9 | Shale, graywacke | 3 | 15.0 | 571.9 | 15.73 | 85.04 | Accentuated Mesomed 4.1 | C1 B′2 s a′ |
ODM-Nave Redondo * | 10 | Shale, graywacke | 3 | 15.1 | 748.9 | 40.03 | 90.56 | Accentuated Mesomed 4.1 | C2 B′2 s2 a′ |
ODM-Cortes Pereira * | 15 | Shale, graywacke | 3 | 15.8 | 623.1 | 22.08 | 83.52 | Accentuated Mesomed 4.1 | C1 B′2 s2 a′ |
Caldeirão | 25 | Shale, graywacke | 3 | 15.9 | 866.7 | 51.40 | 95.90 | Accentuated Mesomed 4.1 | B1 B′2 s2 a′ |
Barrocal | 20 | Limestone | 4 | 15.9 | 697.0 | 33.96 | 118.18 | Attenuated Thermomed 4.2 | C2 B′2 s2 a′ |
Climatic Classification | N | Maltose | Sucrose | Glucose | Fructose | Reducing Sugar | Total Sugar |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
(Mean ± SE g/100 g, Fresh Pulp Fruit) | |||||||
Accentuated Mesomediterranean | 133 | 1.42 ± 0.15 a | 0.78 ± 0.07 a | 5.40 ± 0.12 a | 12.79 ± 0.29 a | 19.61 ± 0.46 a | 20.39 ± 0.47 a |
Attenuated Mesomediterranean | 45 | 0.89 ± 0.13 b | 0.55 ± 0.09 a | 4.64 ± 0.33 ab | 9.63 ± 0.68 b | 15.16 ± 1.05 b | 15.71 ± 1.09 b |
Attenuated Thermomediterranean | 20 | 1.02 ± 0.15 ab | 0.39 ± 0.14 a | 4.03 ± 0.25 c | 7.89 ± 0.55 c | 12.95 ± 0.79 b | 13.34 ± 0.84 b |
Sub-Mediterranean | 6 | 0.87 ± 0.30 b | 0.00 ± 0.00 a | 4.33 ± 0.10 bc | 8.66 ± 0.43 bc | 13.86 ± 0.71 b | 13.86 ± 0.71 b |
Total/Global mean | 204 | 1.25 ± 0.10 | 0.67 ± 0.05 | 5.07 ± 0.11 | 11.49 ± 0.28 | 17.81 ± 0.43 | 18.47 ± 0.44 |
Climatic Classification | N | Maltose | Sucrose | Glucose | Fructose | Reducing Sugar | Total Sugar |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mean ± SE (g/100 g, Fresh Pulp Fruit) | |||||||
B4 B′2 s a′ | 6 | 0.87 ± 0.30 cde | 0.00 ± 0.00 ab | 4.33 ± 0.10 ab | 8.66 ± 0.43 bc | 13.86 ± 0.71 bc | 13.86 ± 0.71 bc |
B3 B′2 s2 a′ | 19 | 1.24 ± 0.23 cd | 0.12 ± 0.07 b | 3.98 ± 0.11 b | 8.54 ± 0.32 c | 13.77 ± 0.55 c | 13.89 ± 0.58 c |
B1 B′2 s2 a′ | 102 | 0.57 ± 0.06 e | 1.02 ± 0.07 a | 5.47 ± 0.18 a | 11.55 ± 0.35 b | 17.59 ± 0.54 b | 18.61 ± 0.57 b |
C1 B′2 s a′ | 9 | 2.06 ± 0.30 b | 0.32 ± 0.16 ab | 4.16 ± 0.30 ab | 11.31 ± 0.61 bc | 17.54 ± 0.85 bc | 17.85 ± 0.88 bc |
C1 B′2 s2 a′ | 15 | 3.73 ± 0.53 a | 0.51 ± 0.17 ab | 5.82 ± 0.39 a | 17.01 ± 1.46 a | 26.56 ± 2.31 a | 27.07 ± 2.30 a |
C2 B′2 s a′ | 7 | 0.87 ± 0.24 de | 0.39 ± 0.27 ab | 4.31 ± 0.25 ab | 11.59 ± 0.43 abc | 16.77 ± 0.72 bc | 17.17 ± 0.65 bc |
C2 B′2 s2 a′ | 46 | 1.89 ± 0.25 bc | 0.37 ± 0.10 ab | 4.77 ± 0.20 ab | 11.17 ± 0.61 bc | 17.83 ± 0.89 bc | 18.19 ± 0.91 bc |
Total/Global mean | 204 | 1.25 ± 0.10 | 0.67 ± 0.05 | 5.07 ± 0.11 | 11.49 ± 0.28 | 17.81 ± 0.43 | 18.47 ± 0.44 |
N = 204 | B * | Std. Err. of b * | b | Std. Err. of b | t (189) | p-Value |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Intercept | 8.936646 | 8.271868 | 1.08037 | 0.281356 | ||
Local/Prov. * | 0.36478 | 0.178853 | 0.014216 | 0.006970 | 2.03954 | 0.042788 |
P annual (mm) * | −4.17974 | 1.371076 | −0.003352 | 0.001100 | −3.04851 | 0.002629 |
T annual (°C) | 0.20738 | 0.116945 | 0.029438 | 0.016600 | 1.77335 | 0.077782 |
Altitude (m) | −0.23436 | 0.149311 | −0.000202 | 0.000129 | −1.56964 | 0.118171 |
Xerothermic index * | −0.40376 | 0.196952 | −0.003293 | 0.001606 | −2.05014 | 0.041732 |
Sun Exp. (1–8) | −0.03605 | 0.066087 | −0.002118 | 0.003883 | −0.54542 | 0.586106 |
Light (1–3) | 0.00809 | 0.092425 | 0.002102 | 0.024016 | 0.08752 | 0.930354 |
Soil Texture (1–11) | 0.18024 | 0.094916 | 0.009293 | 0.004894 | 1.89900 | 0.059088 |
pH (1–5) * | −0.46739 | 0.195788 | −0.093108 | 0.039002 | −2.38724 | 0.017962 |
Longitude | −0.05647 | 0.287082 | −0.013405 | 0.068146 | −0.19671 | 0.844268 |
Latitude | 0.33393 | 0.212757 | 0.030505 | 0.019436 | 1.56956 | 0.118191 |
Humid Index (Ihu) * | 3.63697 | 1.304984 | 0.024660 | 0.008848 | 2.78698 | 0.005863 |
Climat. Clas. Xero. * Ind. * | −0.22129 | 0.096013 | −0.031799 | 0.013797 | −2.30479 | 0.022265 |
Inland vs. Coast | −0.17945 | 0.273031 | −0.054265 | 0.082564 | −0.65724 | 0.511823 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Chá, L.C.; Ressurreição, S.; Oliveira, L.; Santos, S.; Nunes, M.; Vidal, M.; Varejão, J.; Gomes, F. Sugar Content in Arbutus unedo L. Fruit and Its Relationship with Climatic and Edaphic Characteristics. Plants 2024, 13, 3383. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants13233383
Chá LC, Ressurreição S, Oliveira L, Santos S, Nunes M, Vidal M, Varejão J, Gomes F. Sugar Content in Arbutus unedo L. Fruit and Its Relationship with Climatic and Edaphic Characteristics. Plants. 2024; 13(23):3383. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants13233383
Chicago/Turabian StyleChá, Luciano Chá, Sandrine Ressurreição, Libânia Oliveira, Sandra Santos, Manuel Nunes, Maria Vidal, Jorge Varejão, and Filomena Gomes. 2024. "Sugar Content in Arbutus unedo L. Fruit and Its Relationship with Climatic and Edaphic Characteristics" Plants 13, no. 23: 3383. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants13233383
APA StyleChá, L. C., Ressurreição, S., Oliveira, L., Santos, S., Nunes, M., Vidal, M., Varejão, J., & Gomes, F. (2024). Sugar Content in Arbutus unedo L. Fruit and Its Relationship with Climatic and Edaphic Characteristics. Plants, 13(23), 3383. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants13233383