Next Article in Journal
Karyotype’s Rearrangement in Some Hybrids of the Orchidinae Subtribe
Previous Article in Journal
Global Research Trends and Recent Advances in Medicinal Plant-Synthesized Nanoparticles for Cancer Treatment
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Non-Structural Carbohydrates Accumulation in Seedlings Improved Flowering Quality of Tree Peony under Forcing Culture Conditions, with Roots Playing a Crucial Role

1
Henan Comprehensive Utilization Engineering Technical Research Center for Peony, College of Mudan, Henan University of Science and Technology, Luoyang 471023, China
2
College of Landscape Architecture and Art, Henan Agricultural University, Zhengzhou 450002, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Plants 2024, 13(20), 2837; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants13202837
Submission received: 21 August 2024 / Revised: 8 October 2024 / Accepted: 8 October 2024 / Published: 10 October 2024
(This article belongs to the Section Plant Physiology and Metabolism)

Abstract

:
(1) Tree peony (Paeonia suffruticosa Andrews) is a woody ornamental plant originating from China, and beloved by people worldwide. Non-structural carbohydrates (NSCs) play a crucial role in regulating the flowering quality of tree peonies in both field and potted conditions. However, the effects of NSCs accumulation and allocation in various organs during the vegetative growth stage on the flowering quality of tree peony under forcing culture remains unclear. (2) Two-year-old grafted seedlings of tree peony cv. ‘Luoyanghong’ were subjected to orthogonal treatments to investigate the role of NSCs accumulation in plants’ developmental process. We measured leaf photosynthetic capacity, NSCs accumulation in the organs of seedlings, observed key ornamental characteristics of flowering quality under forcing culture conditions, and evaluated the qualities of seedlings and flowers using the seedling index (SI) and flowering index (FI), respectively. (3) There was a significant positive correlation between leaf photosynthetic capacity and NSCs accumulation in both the whole plant and roots of potted tree peony. Roots were identified as the primary organs for NSCs accumulation in potted tree peonies. Sufficient NSCs accumulation in the plant, particularly in the roots during the defoliation period, was essential not only for enhancing the seedling quality of potted tree peonies but also for improving the flowering quality under forcing culture conditions. Both the seedling index (SI) and flowering index (FI) exhibited a significant dose-response with increasing root NSCs accumulation at defoliation. The T3 group, which involved slight root pruning (by 25%), combined with a high-concentration rooting agent (750 mg·L−1) and Metarhizium anisopliae (20 million U·mL−1), resulted in the highest photosynthetic capacity, SI, FI and NSCs accumulation status (NSCAR), making it the optimal treatment combination. (4) This finding indicates that increasing NSCs accumulation in the roots of potted tree peonies is a crucial biological foundation for producing high-quality potted flowers under forcing culture conditions, which provide new insights into the importance of NSCs in tree peony flowering and may improve the production technology for high-quality potted tree peony flowers under forcing culture conditions.

1. Introduction

Tree peonies, known as Paeonia suffruticosa Andr., originated from China and boast a heritage stretching over 1500 years. Renowned for their brilliant and fragrant flower, they are extolled as the ‘king of flowers’, symbolizing wealth and prosperity in Chinese culture [1]. Historically, field planting has been the predominant cultivation method for tree peonies due to its low costs and ease of management [2]. However, the natural flowering period of field-planted tree peonies is short and concentrated, posing the challenge of extending the blooming period to meet tourist demands [3]. Interestingly, potted tree peonies play an increasingly important role in off-site and off-season industrial production due to their mobility and ease in controlled environments [4,5]. Significant improvements in the flowering quality of potted tree peony have been achieved through the efforts of horticulturists [6,7]. Some researchers have proposed that flowering of tree peony requires significant nutrient consumption [8]. However, there are few reports detailing the role of nutrient accumulation in the flowering process of tree peony.
Tree peony, a perennial deciduous shrub, stores photosynthetic assimilates in stems and roots as material and energy sources for organ reconstruction in the subsequent growth period [9]. The growth of tree peony buds and leaves is almost simultaneous from spring to early summer, leading to intense competition for nutrient remobilization between vegetative and reproductive organs. This nutrient competition often results in bud abortion [10]. Defoliation, which reduces leaf competition for nutrients, is beneficial for increasing the flowering quality under forcing culture conditions [11].
Roots are one of the main nutrient providers for the growth of buds and leaves. The concentration of carbon (C), nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P), and potassium (K) in the roots significantly decreases after flowering [12], indicating that enhancing the nutrient mobilization capacity in roots may improve the flowering quality of potted tree peony under forcing culture conditions [13]. Inorganic elements (N, P, and K) for plant growth and development can be quickly supplemented through irrigation [14]. However, off-season potted tree peony production faces certain challenges and difficulties in the reconstruction of tissue carbon skeleton during the plant development process. In fact, the storage of organic carbon of roots during the vigorous growth period is a key factor for the new organ reconstruction of tree peony in the next growth period.
Organic carbon in plants includes structural carbohydrates (SCs) and non-structural carbohydrates (NSCs). SCs are polysaccharides used to build and solidify plant tissues, including cell walls, stems and stalks, making them difficult to remobilize [15,16]. In contrast, NSCs are the main form of carbon storage and can undergo frequent transformations, providing the building blocks for plant reconstruction and versatile resources for metabolic processes [17].
NSCs, which consist mainly of soluble sugars and starch, are crucial substrates for construction and energy, and even act as signaling triggers in maintaining plant life and defense [18,19]. In adverse conditions, such as low temperatures and drought, when photosynthates cannot meet the demands of metabolism, storage NSCs are remobilized to help plants survive unfavorable conditions [20]. Due to morphological and physiological diversity, plants have evolved different NSCs storage and mobilization strategies [21]. Deciduous broad-leaved trees stored more NSCs in their roots than evergreen species. When low temperatures occur, stored starch in roots converts to soluble sugars, which protect plants from low-temperature damage and provide energy for leave and stem growth in spring [22]. NSCs accumulation during the previous growing season also significantly impacts deciduous plant regrowth in the next season [23]. Our previous research found that the growth status of above-ground parts of the tree peony is closely related to the accumulation of NSCs [24]. Major ornamental characteristics of tree peony, such as flowering rate, petal color, flower diameter and flowering period, are significantly influenced by NSCs content [25,26,27]. However, our current understanding of NSCs’ impact on tree peony flowering is limited. Previous studies primarily focused on the influence of NSCs concentration on growth during the normal season, rarely addressing the accumulation of NSCs and its effect on off-season flowering quality under forcing culture conditions.
This study aimed to investigate the specific role of NSCs accumulation in regulating the flowering quality of tree peony under forcing culture conditions. An orthogonal test was designed with three factors: root pruning, rooting agent and Metarhizium anisopliae. The objective was to explore the relationship between NSCs accumulation in organs and flowering characteristics of potted tree peony. This experiment may provide valuable technical support for the simplified and high-quality production of potted off-season tree peony flowers under forcing culture conditions.

2. Results

2.1. Changes in the Photosynthetic Capacity of Leaves

Leaves are the main organs for NSCs production in potted tree peony plants, and high photosynthetic capacity is essential for accumulating sufficient NSCs. These NSCs play important roles in supporting seedling development and organ reconstruction for the next growth stage. Photosynthesis parameters were measured by the Li-6400 system in May 2021. The results showed no significant difference in Pn among all groups (Table 1). However, groups with slight root pruning showed lower Gs, Tr, and Ci, and higher WUE, indicating that a well-developed root system is beneficial for improving the efficiency of water and CO2 utilization in the leaves of potted tree peony.
Leaf area per plant (LA) is also a key factor influencing the photosynthetic assimilation capacity of seedlings. The results indicated that LA decreased with increased root pruning and showed an increasing trend with increased concentrations of rooting agent. This suggests that root pruning and rooting agent have different effects on leaf development: root pruning reduces nutrient storage in roots, inhibiting leaf development, while rooting agent can alleviate these negative effects.
Antioxidant capacity plays an important role in the continuous synthesis of NSCs in leaves. The results showed that leaf POD activity of slight root pruning groups was higher than in the control. Concurrently, the content of MDA, a product of membrane lipid peroxidation, decreased with increasing rooting agent concentration. These findings indicate that root pruning and rooting agent have different effects on antioxidant capacity in potted tree peony leaves. Root pruning may reduce the storage nutrient in roots, thereby limiting leaf expansion, while rooting agent can mitigate this negative effect.

2.2. Differences in Morphology and NSCs accumulation of Potted Seedlings

The morphological characteristics and NSCs accumulation status of potted tree peony seedlings were measured after defoliation in October 2021, revealing significant differences among the 10 groups. Abundant fibrous roots developed at the coarse roots in all groups, an important adaptive phenomenon to the potted environment (Figure S1). Except for T1 and T6, the stem length (SL) in all groups was significantly shorter than that of T0, indicating that root pruning showed a noticeable dwarfing effect (Table 2). Meanwhile, stem diameter (SD), whole plant biomass (WPB), NSCs accumulation in the root (NSCAR), NSCs accumulation in the total plant (NSCAT), and seedling index (SI) decreased with increasing root pruning but showed an upward trend with higher concentrations of the rooting agent. Notably, over 96% of NSCs were stored in the root in all groups. The WPB and NSCAT of T2, T3, and T6 exceeded those of T0. The growth quality of potted tree peony seedlings, evaluated by SI, indicated that the slight and moderate root pruning groups achieved or surpassed the quality of T0, with T3 exhibiting the highest SI.

2.3. Differences in Flowering Quality under Forcing Culture Conditions

Under forcing culture management, the flowering characteristics among different groups exhibited notable differences (Figure S2; Table 3). Compared to control (T0), plant height (PH) of T7 and T8 groups significantly reduced by 26.8% and 28.9%, respectively, while branches number (BN) increased by approximately 27%, 60%, 60%, 94%, 110%, 94%, 83%, 94% and 38%, respectively (Table 3). Severe root pruning (T7 and T8) resulted in crown width (CW), leaf length and SPAD values that were markedly lower than those of T0. However, there was no significant difference in the branch diameter (BD) and leaf thickness (LT). The moderate root pruning groups (T4, T5 and T6) had the highest flowering number per plant (FNP), likely due to their high branching ability. There was no significant difference in flower diameter (FD) among all groups except for T7 and T8. The value L* increased with increasing degree of root pruning, while the value a* and anthocyanin content (PAC) decreased. Flavonoid content in petals (PFC)increased with the concentration of the rooting agent. There was no significant difference in soluble sugars’ content in petals compared to T0. The flowering quality under forcing culture conditions was further evaluated using the flowering index (FI), revealing that the FI of T2, T3, T5, and T6 was significantly higher than that of T0, with T3 achieving the highest value. This indicates that optimized transplant management measures could significantly improve the flowering quality of tree peony under forcing culture.
Furthermore, analysis of the effect of treatments on FI using range analysis showed that the influence of the three treatments on the FI ranked from high to low as follows: root pruning > rooting agent > Metarhizium anisopliae. The optimal levels for each factor were slight root pruning, high concentration of rooting agent, and Metarhizium anisopliae, respectively. The optimal group was T3: A1B3C3, which involved 25% root pruning intensity, irrigation with 750 mg·L−1 rooting agent, and 20 million U·mL−1 Metarhizium anisopliae (Table 4), achieving optimal flowering quality for the regulation of the opening stage of potted tree peony.

2.4. Correlations Analysis of Growth Parameters of Potted Seedlings and Off-Season Flower

As previously mentioned, there are differences in the growth parameters of potted seedlings and off-season flowering quality among different groups. To analyze the intrinsic relationship between these parameters, a simple correlation analysis was conducted. The results showed that photosynthesis parameters of leave significantly affect NSCs accumulation (Figure 1a). Among these parameters, Gs and Tr were positively and negatively correlated with NSCAT and NSCAR, respectively, while WUE, LA and POD, key indexes of photosynthetic capacity, had significant or extremely significant positive correlations with NSCAT and NSCAR. Furthermore, NSCAT and NSCAR also positively correlated with SL, SD, WPB and SI of potted seedlings. The correlation coefficient of NSCAR with SI reached 0.668, indicating that improving of photosynthetic capacity is beneficial for NSCs assimilation, and sufficient NSCs accumulation is foundational for strengthening seedling growth.
The parameters of flowering and vegetative growth of flowers are interrelated (Figure 1b). FD was positively correlated with PH, CW, SPAD, BW and LL. SPAD was positively correlated with BW, LL, FD, PAC, PFC and PSSC. Both FD and SPAD have negative correlations with BN. FI, a comprehensive evaluation index of potted tree peony flowering, showed significant positive correlations with CW, SPAD, BW, LL, FNP, FD, a*, PAC and PFC, while it was negatively correlated with L* and LT.

2.5. Correlation Network Analysis between Growth Parameter of Potted Seedling and Off-Season Flowering

The correlation network of growth parameters for potted seedlings and off-season flowering quality was constructed to identify the key factors in tree peony growth (Figure 2). The correlation threshold was set to 0.4 for positive correlations and −0.4 for negative correlations (p < 0.05). The nodes with red background indicated stronger correlations, signifying essential factors. The results showed that NSCAR, NSCAT and FI were key factors in tree peony growth. Therefore, we suggest that NSCs accumulation in roots of potted seedlings may play an important role in the flowering processes of forcing-cultured tree peony.

2.6. Dependency between SI and FI on Roots’ NSCs accumulation

At the time of defoliation, more than 96% of NSCs were stored in the roots of potted tree peony seedlings (Table 2). Therefore, the NSCs storage capacity of the total plant depends primarily on that of the roots. The dependency relationship of SI and FI on NSCs accumulation was analyzed using scatter plots, revealing that both SI and FI significantly increased with the increase in NSCAR (Figure 3). The determination coefficients between SI and NSCAR, FI and NSCAR are 0.4530 and 0.5129 (p < 0.01), respectively. This further confirms that NSCs accumulation played a crucial role in the growth of potted tree peonies and has significant dosage effects on the qualities of seedlings and flowering. Further analysis of the dependency of SI and FI (Figure 4) found a positive correlation between FI and SI, with a determination coefficient of 0.4825 (p < 0.01). Therefore, the flowering quality of forcing-cultured tree peony highly depends on the SI of potted base seedlings.

3. Discussion

3.1. Seedling Quality Depends upon NSCs accumulation of Potted Tree Peony

Under normal conditions, plants assimilate CO2 from the atmosphere via photosynthesis, using most of it in biomass construction and metabolism. A smaller fraction, in the form of soluble sugars or starch, is stored in NSCs pools [28]. NSCs play distinct functional roles, including matter transport, energy metabolism, osmoregulation, development, signaling regulation and defense when carbon assimilation cannot meet the demand. Therefore, NSCs accumulation is an integrative function relating to all life activities of plants [29].
Leaf being the main photosynthesis organ, its capacity for carbon uptake is affected by inherent and extrinsic factors, such as temperature and water in the environment, chloroplast structure, leaf morphology and antioxidant capacity [30]. Our results indicated that LA, WUE and POD were key indicators of the photosynthetic capacity of leaves, which positively correlated to NSCs accumulation and is significantly affected by root pruning degree. This suggested that NSCs accumulation influences leaf photosynthesis interdependently. For example, root pruning reduces NSCs storage in roots, which inhibits the photosynthetic capacity of leaves during vigorous growth periods, resulting in a decrease in NSCs accumulation. Interestingly, rooting agent treatment could promote leaf growth and improve WUE, which is beneficial for NSCs accumulation. This may be related to the regulatory effect of phytohormones in rooting agent on leaves [31].
In their long-term evolution, plants have developed one or more NSCs pools in their bodies to avoid the risk of NSCs depletion, providing energy for various life activities [32,33]. NSCs are distributed and stored in various organs, enabling plants to balance “growth” and “resistance” [21]. Our results showed that over 96% of NSCs in tree peony seedlings were stored in roots after defoliation, indicating that roots are the main NSCs pools. Fewer NSCs accumulated in stems, serving as auxiliary NSCs pools. However, this distribution may change as the plant ages and during growth seasons.
The natural living environments of plants are variable, so plants, and long-lived trees, in particular, are likely to face stressful conditions throughout their lives. Adversities such as drought, high temperature, low temperature, excessive shading, biotic and abiotic stress can temporarily or permanently destroy plant photosynthetic organs, which limits carbon uptake and forces plants to rely on NSCs storage [34,35,36]. Consequently, a plant’s ability to remobilize and reuse stored NSCs for metabolic activity, defense, and osmoregulation is directly linked to its survival [37,38,39,40]. Kabeya found that the seasonal distribution of NSCs is closely related to plant nutrient status in high-elevation plants, suggesting that NSCs can serve as indicators for assessing plants’ nutrient status [41]. The decreased NSCs concentration in P. sylvestris seedlings due to prolonged storage negatively affects their survival and growth after planting [42].
Compared to field cultivation, potted plants live in a small, and unstable space with restricted root growth, making them more susceptible to biotic and abiotic stress. Therefore, NSCs reserves in potted seedlings are considered a key quality attribute that can improve seedling field performance in out-planting [43]. Our result showed that NSCAR and NSCAT had significant correlations with SL, SD, WPB and SI of potted seedlings, indicating that NSCs are essential building blocks for biomass (Figure 1a). Since more than 96% of NSCs are stored in the roots of potted tree peonies, NSCAR played a more important role in tree peony seedling growth than NSCAT (Table 2), making it a powerful physiological index for seedling quality evaluation. SI, an effective morphological indicator, is widely used in the evaluation of seedling quality [44]. Our results showed that SI significantly and positively correlated with NSCAR, with a significant dose effect (Figure 3). This makes it useful for the rapid assessment of tree peony seedling quality in production. In summary, the T3 group had the highest photosynthetic capacity, SI and NSCAR, making it the optimal group.

3.2. NSCs Are Matter and Energy Sources and Signaling Triggers of Off-Season Tree Peony

NSCs are reserved not only as organic matter and energy substrates for organ reconstruction, but also as sugar signaling triggers in coordinating the vegetative and reproductive growth of plants. A study on Mediterranean oaks found that, compared with evergreen Mediterranean oaks, deciduous species stored more NSCs for new branch growth, with their biomass being significantly influenced by NSCs in early spring [45]. In sweet orange trees, flowering is the most energy-demanding phenological stage, with about 80% of the total NSCs consumed before the end of fruit drop, primarily until flowering, and the demand for NSCs increased with increasing flower number [46]. In the production of cut peony flowering, NSCs were crucial for improving flower quality, and the depletion of NSCs significantly shortened the flowering periods [47]. In the flowering process of tree peony, NSCs not only provide essential energy but also play a role in sugar signaling. T6P, a type of NSCs, regulated the expression of sugar signaling-related genes such as PsTPS, PsSnRK1 and PsHXK, key factors in regulating tree peony flowering [48].
FI was significantly and positively correlated with most ornamental characteristics, such as CW, SPAD, BW, LL, FNP, FD, a*, PAC and PFC, making it the most important index for evaluating tree peony flowering quality. The determination coefficients between FI and both NSCAR and SI were 0.5129 and 0.4825, respectively, with significant dose effects. This suggested that NSCAR may be the physiological factor linking SI and FI, indicating that we could select the high-quality quality seedling for off-season potted tree peony production based on NSCs accumulation in root or SI. However, SI, being a non-destructive measure, is more suitable for practical production requirements. In our test, the T3 group, which had the highest SI, FI, and NSCs accumulation in roots, proved to be the optimal treatment.

3.3. Roots NSCs Remobilization Is a Milestone in Forcing Culture Conditions

Storage pools in plants are defined as stored resources that have been accumulated and can be remobilized; this mobilization may occur daily, seasonally or decadally in different organs [49]. The remobilization of accumulated NSCs varies across organs or years. For example, during the flowering of sweet oranges, the root serves as the main NSCs pool, supporting 73% of remobilized NSCs for the entire plant [44]. Under normal conditions, NSCs accumulated during the growing season are unlikely to be fully depleted, with previously stored NSCs being preserved in deeper structures as old NSCs [50]. Compared to old NSCs, the new NSCs have a high turnover rate, suggesting that plants prefer to use newly accumulated NSCs over old ones [51].
For tree peony, increased remobilization of NSCs through the application of GA can promote flowering and improve flower quality [52]. In our study, the accumulated NSCs in roots played a more significant role in tree peony flowering than those in stem (Figure 2). The FI increased with NSCAR rapidly at first and then slowly, exhibiting significant dosage effects. This suggested that remobilized NSCs in seedlings likely meet the need for flowering in optimal groups. However, the quantification of remobilized NSCs in different organs during tree peony flowering requires further experimentation. Additionally, investigating whether increasing the remobilization of NSCs, primarily by phytohormone, temperature, gas and water [30,53], is beneficial in enhancing tree peony flowering quality is a promising area for exploring.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Experimental Site and Design

Two-year-old grafted plants of Paeonia suffruticosa (‘Luoyanghong’) were cultivated at the potted tree peony research station of Henan University of Science and Technology, located in Luoyang of Henan province, China (Latitude 34°47′18″ N, and longitude 112°34′40″ E, elevation 191 m). This experiment utilized an orthogonal design with L9(34) orthogonal tables. Four hundred robust, disease-free, and uniformly grafted seedlings were selected in October 2020. These plants were randomly divided into 10 groups, and coarse roots were pruned to different degrees (Treatment A: 25%, 33%, and 50% of total root length removed). Subsequently, the plants were potted in black plastic pots (25 cm height, 22 cm inner diameter) and irrigated with different concentrations of rooting agents (Treatment B: 250, 500, and 750 mg·L−1) and Metarhizium anisopliae suspension (Treatment C: 10, 15, and 20 million U·mL−1, Greenation, Chongqing, China). The treatments are detailed in Table 5.

4.2. Potted Seedling Growth and Flowering Regulation

The potting substrate was primarily composed of peat and high-temperature decomposed organic fertilizer, with a bulk density of 0.3 g·cm−3 and a pH of 6.7. The substrate contained 400 mg·g−1 of organic matter, 230 mg·g−1 of total carbon, 15 mg·g−1 of total nitrogen, 500 μg·g−1 of available phosphorus, and 30 μg·g−1 of available potassium. Each pot was filled with approximately 5.0 kg of substrate with a 50% moisture content. These potted tree peonies were placed under a shade net with a 40% shading rate and received normal water and fertilizer management until defoliation in October 2021. After defoliation in autumn 2021, the biomass of each organ of the potted seedlings was measured, with four repetitions. Subsequently, four other potted tree peonies were moved into −2 °C cold storage for 35 days of vernalization treatment, and then transported to a greenhouse to regulate the flowering period under forcing culture conditions until the plants opened.

4.3. Measurement of Photosynthesis Performance

The net photosynthetic rate (Pn), intercellular CO2 concentration (Ci), stomatal conductance (Gs), and transpiration rate (Tr) were determined using a Li-6400 portable photosynthesis system (Li-COR, Tucson, AZ, USA) at 25 °C, 1000 µmol m−2 s−1 light intensity. Water use efficiency (WUE) was calculated as WUE = Pn/Tr. Three top leaves in a plant were measured, with five repetitions per group, during the vigorous growth stage of tree peonies in May 2021. Leaf area per plant (LA) was determined using Digimizer (https://www.digimizer.com/, 25 May 2021) image analysis software (MedCalc Software Ltd., Ostend, Belgium).

4.4. Determination of Antioxidant Performance

Peroxidase (POD) activity was assessed using the guaiacol method [54]. Malondialdehyde (MDA) content was measured via the thio-barbituric acid method [55] during the vigorous growth stage of tree peonies in May 2021. Leaves from four plants were combined and ground into powder in liquid nitrogen, and four replicates were collected.

4.5. Seedlings’ Morphological Observation at Defoliation

After defoliation in October 2021, the substrate around the roots was washed with tap water. Four tree peony seedlings per group were separated into four organs (stems, old roots, woody new roots, and fine roots). Stem length (SL) and stem diameter (SD) were measured using a vernier caliper with an accuracy of 0.01 mm. The biomass of the whole plant (WPB) and each organ was measured using an electronic balance with an accuracy of 0.01 g. The robustness of the potted seedlings was evaluated based on the seedling index (SI) [56].
SI was calculated using the following formula:
SI = SD/SL × WPB

4.6. Characteristics’ Observation of Off-Season Flowering

During peak fluorescence, the ornamental characteristics of potted tree peonies were observed in each group. Branches number (BN) and flower number per plant (FNP) were recorded. Plant height (PH), leaf length (LL), and crown width (CW) were measured using a centimeter scale, and the crown width index (CWI). Flower diameter (FD) and branch diameter were measured using a reading vernier caliper, while leaf thickness (LT) was determined using a spiral micrometer. The SPAD value of leaves (SPAD) was measured with a CCM200 chlorophyll meter [57], and petal color (values a* and L*) was measured using an NR20XE precision color difference meter [58].
CWI was calculated using the following formula:
CWI = CW/PH

4.7. Determination of Non-Structural Carbohydrates

Each organ of four plants was collected and ground into powder in liquid nitrogen. Non-structural carbohydrates (NSCs) in different organs were measured using the anthrone colorimetric method [59]. NSCs accumulation (NSCA) was calculated according to Formula (3). The NSCs accumulation in total plant (NSCAT) was the sum of NSCA in each organ.
NSCA was calculated using the following formula.
NSCA = NSCs content × organ biomass

4.8. Determination of Anthocyanin and Flavonoid in Petals

Petal of flowers were ground into powder in liquid nitrogen. The anthocyanin and flavonoid in petals were extracted by acidic methanol solution (with 0.1% hydrochloric acid) for 24 h. The concentration of anthocyanins was determined by the absorbance at 530 and 657 nm [60]. The content of flavonoids was determined using the Al(NO3)3-NaNO2 colorimetry method [61].

4.9. Evaluation of Off-Season Flowering Quality

Based on the national standard for potted tree peony flower classification [62], six key ornamental characteristics were divided into five levels. The flowering index (FI) was then used to comprehensively evaluate flower quality. The scoring criteria are shown in Table 6. FI was calculated according to Formula (4).
FI = a* + FD + FNP + SPAD + BN + CI

4.10. Statistical Analysis

The experimental data were analyzed using Microsoft Excel 2019 (Microsoft Crop., Redmond, WA, USA) and SPSS 17.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) software. Differences in the data were analyzed using one-way ANOVA with post hoc Duncan’s multiple range tests, with p-values less than 0.05 considered statistically significant. The creation of scatter plots of SI and FI with NSCAT were used Excel 2019. The correlation network was performed using the OmicStudio tools at https://www.omicstudio.cn/tool (accessed on 25 July 2024). Photos of potted tree peony seedlings and off-season flowers were processed using Adobe Photoshop CS6 (Adobe Systems Inc., San Jose, CA, USA).

5. Conclusions

In summary, this study demonstrated that high photosynthetic capacity is the base of increasing NSCs assimilation in root; moreover, sufficient NSCs are beneficial in achieving the highest seedling and flowering quality in potted tree peony. T3 group treated by light root pruning combined with high-concentration rooting agent and Metarhizium anisopliae have the highest photosynthetic capacity, status of NSCs accumulation, seedling and flowering quality, and this is the optimal treatment. These findings provide a new perspective in understanding the key roles of NSCs in tree peony growth and flowering and offer a measure for optimizing the cultivation practices of tree peony. This has great application value in the industrial production of off-season potted tree peony flowers. Although NSCs accumulation in plants is the endogenous material basis for improving the flowering quality of off-season tree peony, further studies on the mechanisms of NSCs remobilization in plants will provide new insights for the off-season cultivation of tree peonies.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/plants13202837/s1, Figure S1: Seedlings morphology of potted tree peony at defoliation stage; Figure S2: The flowering status of off-season potted tree peony by forcing culture.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.G.; funding acquisition, G.S. and S.G.; project administration G.S.; methodology, S.Z. and Y.Z.; investigation, S.S. and T.S.; formal analysis, Y.Z. and S.S.; resources, S.Z. and G.S.; writing—original draft, S.S. and T.S.; writing—review and editing, G.S. supervision, G.S. All authors discussed the results and commented on the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Key Research and Development Program (2020YFD1000500).

Data Availability Statement

Data are contained within the article and Supplementary Materials.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare there are no competing interests.

References

  1. Zhou, S.; Ma, C.; Zhou, W.B.; Gao, S.C.; Hou, D.Y.; Guo, L.L.; Shi, G.A. Selection of stable reference genes for QRT-PCR in tree peony ‘Doulv’ and functional analysis of PsCUC3. Plants 2024, 13, 1741. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Liu, P.; Fu, L.S.; Jang, K.M. Comparative analysis on economic benefit of Xiangfeng Peony. Sci. Silvae Sin. 2019, 55, 167–174. [Google Scholar]
  3. Zhou, H.; Cheng, F.Y.; Wang, R.; Zhong, Y.; He, C.Y. Transcriptome comparison reveals key candidate genes responsible for the unusual reblooming trait in tree peonies. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e79996. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Li, J.J. Zhongguo Mudan Shaoyao; China Forestry Publishing House: Beijing, China, 1999; pp. 15–35. [Google Scholar]
  5. Guan, Y.R.; Xue, J.Q.; Xue, Y.Q.; Yang, R.W.; Wang, S.L.; Zhang, X.X. Effect of exogenous GA3 on flowering quality, endogenous hormones, and hormone- and flowering-associated gene expression in forcing-cultured tree peony (Paeonia suffruticosa). J. Integr. Agric. 2019, 18, 1295–1311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Wang, S.L.; Xue, J.Q.; Ahmadi, N.; Holloway, P.; Zhu, F.Y.; Ren, X.X.; Zhang, X.X. Molecular characterization and expression patterns of PsSVP genes reveal distinct roles in flower bud abortion and flowering in tree peony (Paeonia suffruticosa). Can. J. Plant Sci. 2014, 94, 1181–1193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Mornya, P.M.P.; Cheng, F.Y. Effect of combined chilling and GA3 treatment on bud abortion in forced ‘Luoyanghong’ tree peony (Paeonia suffruticosa Andr.). Hortic. Plant J. 2018, 4, 250–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Gao, Z.M.; Wang, L.Y. Study on the root growth and photosynthesis characteristics of the tree peony after rejuvenation. Forest Res. 2004, 17, 479–483. [Google Scholar]
  9. Wang, C.Z.; Ma, X.Y.; Li, Q.K.; Hu, Y.H.; Yang, J.; Song, Z.P. Effects of NSC in different organs and at different growth stages on the yield of oil peony Fengdan with different ages. Front. Plant Sci. 2023, 14, 1108668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Xue, J.Q.; Li, T.T.; Wang, S.L.; Xue, Y.Q.; Liu, X.W.; Zhang, X.X. Defoliation and gibberellin synergistically induce tree peony flowering with non-structural carbohydrates as intermedia. J. Plant Physiol. 2019, 233, 31–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Wang, Y.Y.; Wang, X.P.; Xue, Y.Q.; Wang, S.L.; Ren, X.X.; Xue, J.Q.; Zhang, X.X. Complete defoliation is essential for tree peony reflowering in autumn to trigger sucrose metabolism and adjust source-sink balance in buds and leaves. Sci. Hortic. 2023, 308, 111540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Tong, N.N.; Shu, Q.Y.; Wang, B.C.; Peng, L.P.; Liu, Z.A. Histology, physiology, and transcriptomic and metabolomic profiling reveal the developmental dynamics of annual shoots in tree peonies (Paeonia suffruticosa Andr.). Hortic. Res. 2023, 10, uhad152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Shi, S.Y.; Wang, Z.C.; Shi, G.A. Effects of two forced cultivation methods on quality of potted tree peony ‘Luoyanghong’ and regulating effect of boron by root irrigation. Shandong Agric. Sci. 2022, 54, 64–70. [Google Scholar]
  14. Wang, Z.C.; Shi, S.Y.; Gao, S.C. Effect of water-soluble fertilizer on flowering quality of potted itoh peony ‘Bartzella’ under forcing cultivation. Acta Bot. Boreali-Occident. Sin. 2022, 42, 845–853. [Google Scholar]
  15. Li, M.; Hoch, G.; Körner, C. Source/sink removal affects mobile carbohydrates in Pinus cembra at the Swiss treeline. Trees 2002, 16, 331–337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Rezaie, N.; D’Andrea, E.; Scartazza, A.; Gričar, J.; Prislan, P.; Calfapietra, C.; Battistelli, A.; Moscatello, S.; Proietti, S.; Matteucci, G. Upside down and the game of C allocation. Tree Physiol. 2023, tpad034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Smith, M.G.; Miller, R.E.; Arndt, S.K.; Kasel, S.; Bennett, L.T. Whole-tree distribution and temporal variation of non-structural carbohydrates in broadleaf evergreen trees. Tree Physiol. 2018, 38, 570–581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Wiley, E.; Helliker, B. A re-evaluation of carbon storage in trees lends greater support for carbon limitation to growth. New Phytol. 2012, 195, 285–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Reyes-Bahamonde, C.; Piper, F.I.; Cavieres, L.A. Elevational variation of the seasonal dynamic of carbohydrate reserves in an alpine plant of Mediterranean mountains. Alp. Bot. 2022, 132, 315–327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Li, M.H.; Jiang, Y.; Wang, A.; Li, X.; Zhu, W.; Yan, C.F.; Du, Z.; Shi, Z.; Lei, J.; Schönbeck, L.; et al. Active summer carbon storage for winter persistence in trees at the cold alpine treeline. Tree Physiol. 2018, 38, 1345–1355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Chen, W.S.; Ding, H.H.; Li, J.R.; Fu, F.W.; Li, Y.Y.; Xiao, S.Y.; Xu, D.; Lu, J.; Fang, J.P. How do montane plants manage to survive? Inferring from non-structural carbohydrates. Trees 2023, 37, 331–348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Villar-Salvador, P.; Uscola, M.; Jacobs, D.F. The role of stored carbohydrates and nitrogen in the growth and stress tolerance of planted forest trees. New For. 2015, 46, 813–839. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Li, Z.S.; Li, X.L.; He, F. Non-structural carbohydrates contributed to cold tolerance and regeneration of Medicago sativa L. Planta 2023, 257, 116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Shi, S.Y.; Shi, T.; Zhou, S.; Gao, S.C.; Shi, G.A. Characteristics of compensatory growth and non-structural carbohydrates accumulation of potted tree peony. Acta Bot. Boreali-Occident. Sin. 2023, 43, 1732–1743. [Google Scholar]
  25. Zhang, Y.X.; Yu, D.; Liu, C.Y.; Gai, S.P. Dynamic of carbohydrate metabolism and the related genes highlights PPP pathway activation during chilling induced bud dormancy release in tree peony (Paeonia suffruticosa). Sci. Hortic. 2018, 242, 36–43. [Google Scholar]
  26. Yuan, X.; Yuan, T.; Liu, S.D. Variation in physiological and biochemical properties and DNA methylation patterns during autumn flowering of tree peony (Paeonia suffruticosa). Sci. Silvae Sin. 2021, 57, 53–67. [Google Scholar]
  27. Xue, Y.Q.; Liu, Z.Y.; Sun, K.R.; Zhang, X.X.; Lv, Y.M.; Xue, J.Q. The mechanism of sugar signal involved in regulating re-flowering of tree peony under forcing culture. Acta Hortic. Sin. 2023, 50, 596–606. [Google Scholar]
  28. Dietze, M.C.; Sala, A.; Carbone, M.S.; Czimczik, C.I.; Mantooth, J.A.; Richardson, A.D.; Vargas, R. Nonstructural carbon in woody plants. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2014, 65, 667–687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Hartmann, H.; Trumbore, S.E. Understanding the roles of nonstructural carbohydrates in forest trees-from what we can measure to what we want to know. New Phytol. 2016, 211, 386–403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Riikonen, J.; Mäenpää, M.; Alavillamo, M.; Silfver, T.; Oksanen, E. Interactive effect of elevated temperature and O3 on antioxidant capacity and gas exchange in Betula pendula saplings. Planta 2009, 230, 419–427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Shiraz, M.F.; Sami, F.; Siddiqui, H.; Yusuf, M.; Hayat, S. Interaction of auxin and nitric oxide improved photosynthetic efficiency and antioxidant system of brassica juncea plants under salt stress. J. Plant Growth Regul. 2020, 40, 2379–2389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Kuptz, D.; Fleischmann, F.; Matyssek, R.; Grams, T.E. Seasonal patterns of carbon allocation to respiratory pools in 60-yr-old deciduous (Fagus sylvatica) and evergreen (Picea abies) trees assessed via whole-tree stable carbon isotope labeling. New Phytol. 2011, 191, 160–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Omari, E. Accumulation versus storage of total non-structural carbohydrates in woody plants. Trees 2022, 36, 869–881. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Mollá, S.; Villar-Salvador, P.; García-Fayos, P.; Rubira, J.L. Physiological and transplanting performance of Quercus ilex L. (holm oak) seedlings grown in nurseries with different winter conditions. Forest Ecol. Manag. 2006, 237, 218–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Heredia-Guerrero, N.; Oliet, J.A.; Villar-Salvador, P.; Benito, L.F.; Peñuelas, J. Fertilization regime interacts with fall temperature in the nursery to determine the frost and drought tolerance of the Mediterranean oak Quercus ilex subsp. ballota. For. Ecol. Manag. 2014, 331, 50–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Wang, Z.G.; Wang, C.K. Dynamics in nonstructural carbohydrates of Fraxinus mandshurica seedlings during a progressive shade. Trees 2023, 37, 309–317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Mornya, P.M.P.; Cheng, F.Y.; Li, H.Y. Chronological changes in plant hormone and sugar contents in cv. Ao-Shuang autumn flowering tree peony. Hortic. Sci. 2011, 38, 104–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. O’Brien, M.J.; Leuzinger, S.; Philipson, C.D.; Tay, J.; Hector, A. Drought survival of tropical tree seedlings enhanced by non-structural carbohydrate levels. Nat. Clim. Chang. 2014, 4, 710–714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Ai, Z.M.; He, L.R.; Xin, Q.; Yang, T.; Liu, G.B.; Xue, S. Slope aspect affects the non-structural carbohydrates and C: N: P stoichiometry of Artemisia sacrorum on the Loess Plateau in China. Catena 2017, 152, 9–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Liu, W.D.; Su, J.R.; Li, S.F.; Lang, X.D.; Huang, X.B. Non-structural carbohydrates regulated by season and species in the subtropical monsoon broad-leaved evergreen forest of Yunnan Province, China. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 1083. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Kabeya, D. Differentiating between the adverse effects of nutrient-limitation and direct-cold-limitation on tree growth at high altitudes. Arct. Antarct. Alp. Res. 2010, 42, 430–437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Puttonen, P. Carbohydrate reserves in Pinus sylvestris seedling needles as an attribute of seedling vigor. Scand. J. For. Res. 1986, 1, 181–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Grossnickle, S.C.; Ivetić, V. Root system development and field establishment: Effect of seedling quality. New For. 2022, 53, 1021–1067. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Kuo, W.; Yeh, N.; Fujimoto, N.; Lin, H.C. Physicochemical properties and fertility index of culture media containing distillery residue biochar and their applications to plug seedling. J. Fac. Agric. Kyushu Univ. 2019, 64, 127–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Palacio, S.; Camarero, J.J.; Maestro, M.; Alla, A.Q.; Lahoz, E.; Montserrat-Martí, G. Are storage and tree growth related? Seasonal nutrient and carbohydrate dynamics in evergreen and deciduous Mediterranean oaks. Trees 2018, 32, 777–790. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Dovis, V.L.; Machado, E.C.; Ribeiro, R.V.; Filho, J.R.M.; Sales, C.R.G. Roots are important sources of carbohydrates during flowering and fruiting in ‘Valencia’ sweet orange trees with varying fruit load. Sci. Hortic. 2014, 174, 87–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Waltona, E.F.; Boldinghb, H.L.; McLarenc, G.F.; Williamsa, M.; Jackmana, R.B. The dynamics of starch and sugar utilisation in cut peony (Paeonia lactiflora Pall.) stems during storage and vase life. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 2010, 58, 142–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Liu, Z.Y.; Shi, Y.T.; Xue, Y.Q.; Wang, X.P.; Huang, Z.; Xue, Q.Y.; Zhang, X.X. Non-structural carbohydrates coordinate tree peony flowering both as energy substrates and as sugar signaling triggers, with the bracts playing an essential role. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2021, 159, 80–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Chapin, F.S.; Schulze, E.; Mooney, H.A. The ecology and economics of storage in plants. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 1990, 21, 423–447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Trumbore, S.; Czimczik, C.I.; Sierra, C.A.; Muhr, J.; Xu, X. Non-structural carbon dynamics and allocation relate to growth rate and leaf habit in California oaks. Tree Physiol. 2015, 3, 1206–1222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Gaudinski, J.B.; Torn, M.S.; Riley, W.J.; Swanston, C.W.; Trumbore, S.E.; Joslin, J.; Majdi, H.; Dawson, T.E.; Hanson, P. Use of stored carbon reserves in growth of temperate tree roots and leaf buds: Analyses using radiocarbon measurements and modeling. Glob. Chang. Biol. 2009, 15, 992–1014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Xue, Y.Q.; Xue, J.Q.; Ren, X.X.; Li, C.Y.; Sun, K.R.; Cui, L.T.; Lyu, Y.M.; Zhang, X.X. Nutrient supply is essential for shifting tree peony reflowering ahead in autumn and sugar signaling is involved. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 7703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Wang, X.L.; Liu, D.; Li, Z.Q. Effects of the coordination mechanism between roots and leaves induced by root-breaking and exogenous cytokinin spraying on the grazing tolerance of ryegrass. J. Plant Res. 2012, 125, 407–416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Rao, M.V.; Paliyath, G.; Ormrod, D.P. Ultraviolet-B- and ozone-induced biochemical changes in antioxidant enzymes of Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Physiol. 1996, 110, 125–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Heath, R.L.; Packer, L. Photoperoxidation in isolated chloroplasts. I. Kinetics and stoichiometry of fatty acid peroxidation. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 1968, 125, 189–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Liu, C.Y.; Shi, T.; Shi, G.A.; Yang, L.F.; Fan, X.F.; Gao, S.C.; Zhang, G.N. Research on adaptability of different peony to forcing culture. Sci. Silvae Sin. 2019, 55, 54–62. [Google Scholar]
  57. Vig, R.G.; Huzsvai, L.; Dobos, A.; Nagy, J. Systematic measurement methods for the determination of the SPAD values of maize (Zea mays L.) canopy and potato (Solanum tuberosum L.). Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 2012, 43, 1684–1693. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Donoso, A.; Rivas, C.; Zamorano, A.; Peña, Á.; Handford, M.; Aros, D. Understanding alstroemeria pallida flower colour: Links between phenotype, anthocyanins and gene expression. Plants 2020, 10, 55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Buysse, J.; Merckx, R. An improved colorimetric method to quantify sugar content of plant tissue. J. Exp. Bot. 1993, 44, 1627–1629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Luo, J.R.; Duan, J.J.; Huo, D.; Shi, Q.Q.; Niu, L.X.; Zhang, Y.L. Transcriptomic analysis reveals transcription factors related to leaf anthocyanin biosynthesis in Paeonia qiui. Molecules 2017, 22, 2186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. He, J.M.; Yin, T.P.; Chen, Y.; Cai, L.; Tai, Z.G.; Li, Z.J.; Liu, C.S.; Wang, Y.R.; Ding, Z.T. Phenolic compounds and antioxidant activities of edible flowers of Pyrus pashia. J. Funct. Foods 2015, 17, 371–379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. GB/T 27646-2011; Potted Tree Peony. National Forestry Administration: Beijing, China, 2011.
Figure 1. Correlation of growth parameters of potted seedlings (a) and off-season flowering (b) of tree peony. The asterisks indicate significant relation * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01.
Figure 1. Correlation of growth parameters of potted seedlings (a) and off-season flowering (b) of tree peony. The asterisks indicate significant relation * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01.
Plants 13 02837 g001
Figure 2. Correlation network analysis of growth parameters of seedlings and flowers of potted tree peony. The nodes with red background meant stronger correlations. The yellow solid and gray dashed lines connecting nodes mean positive and negative correlations. The area of the point is consistent with its degree of weight. The thickness of lines represents Pearson’s coefficient.
Figure 2. Correlation network analysis of growth parameters of seedlings and flowers of potted tree peony. The nodes with red background meant stronger correlations. The yellow solid and gray dashed lines connecting nodes mean positive and negative correlations. The area of the point is consistent with its degree of weight. The thickness of lines represents Pearson’s coefficient.
Plants 13 02837 g002
Figure 3. Dependence of SI of potted seedling at defoliation and FI of off-season potted flowers on NSCAT of tree peony. Blue spots and line are SI. Orange spots and line are FI.
Figure 3. Dependence of SI of potted seedling at defoliation and FI of off-season potted flowers on NSCAT of tree peony. Blue spots and line are SI. Orange spots and line are FI.
Plants 13 02837 g003
Figure 4. Dependence of SI of potted seedling at defoliation with FI of off-season potted flowers.
Figure 4. Dependence of SI of potted seedling at defoliation with FI of off-season potted flowers.
Plants 13 02837 g004
Table 1. Changes in photosynthesis and lipid peroxidation in potted tree peony leaves.
Table 1. Changes in photosynthesis and lipid peroxidation in potted tree peony leaves.
GroupsPn
/(µmolCO2
·m−2·s−1)
Gs
/(mmolH2O
·m−2·s−1)
Ci
/(µmol ·mol−1)
Tr
/(mmolH2O
·m−2·s−1)
WUE
/(µmolCO2
·mmol−1 H2O)
LA
/(cm2 ·plant−1)
POD Activity/(U·g−1·h−1)MDA Content
/(µmol·g−1)
T010.21 ± 1.510.09 ± 0.01 b200.8 ± 18.0 bc2.89 ± 0.34 de3.54 ± 0.35 a1725.6 ± 263.5 a41.4 ± 13.6 c9.79 ± 0.29 ab
T19.75 ± 2.230.09 ± 0.04 b194.4 ± 29.1 c2.81 ± 0.97 e3.58 ± 0.45 a1554.1 ± 77.6 ab62.5 ± 11.0 b10.07 ± 0.57 a
T210.81 ± 1.790.10 ± 0.02 ab195.7 ± 28.5 c3.08 ± 0.59 cde3.57 ± 0.58 a1345.4 ± 81.4 bc63.7 ± 15.1 b8.54 ± 0.37 de
T311.01 ± 1.650.10 ± 0.02 ab198.1 ± 17.7 c3.27 ± 0.62 bcde3.40 ± 0.25 a1792.3 ± 209.7 a82.7 ± 14.2 a8.14 ± 0.37 ef
T411.41 ± 1.080.10 ± 0.02 ab196.2 ± 17.9 c3.36 ± 0.46 abcd3.42 ± 0.26 a1269.2 ± 244.1 cd19.8 ± 2.6 d9.10 ± 0.33 cd
T510.60 ± 2.440.12 ± 0.03 a225.0 ± 13.9 a3.78 ± 0.85 ab2.82 ± 0.23 bc1237.0 ± 40.5 cd27.9 ± 8.8 cd9.28 ± 0.38 bc
T610.52 ± 1.050.11 ± 0.02 ab222.9 ± 14.9 a4.02 ± 0.47 a2.63 ± 0.28 c1434.7 ± 203.5 bc33.5 ± 11.0 cd8.02 ± 0.39 ef
T710.63 ± 1.060.11 ± 0.02 ab210.7 ± 11.3 abc3.84 ± 0.47 ab2.78 ± 0.15 bc1028.6 ± 112.3 d26.4 ± 6.2 cd10.36 ± 0.4 a
T810.69 ± 1.560.10 ± 0.02 ab189.4 ± 18.8 c3.53 ± 0.67 abcd3.06 ± 0.26 b1097.5 ± 157.0 d15.7 ± 10.2 d7.94 ± 0.35 ef
T910.64 ± 1.490.11 ± 0.02 ab220.0 ± 24.3 ab3.65 ± 0.49 abc2.94 ± 0.43 bc1219.2 ± 209.9 cd19.8 ± 4.6 d7.55 ± 0.13 f
Pn Net photosynthetic rate, Gs Stomatal conductance, Ci Intercellular CO2 concentration, Tr Transpiration rate, WUE Water use efficiency, LA Leaf area per plant. Note: Different letters in the same column meant significant differences at 0.05 level (mean values ± SE, n = 4).
Table 2. Changes in morphology and NSCs accumulation of potted seedlings at defoliation.
Table 2. Changes in morphology and NSCs accumulation of potted seedlings at defoliation.
GroupsSL
/mm
SD
/mm
WPB
/(g·plant−1)
NSCAS
/(g·plant−1)
NSCAR
/(g·plant−1)
NSCAT
/(g·plant−1)
SI
T0111.6 ± 11.9 a6.2 ± 0.1 ab344.8 ± 39.2 a1.42 ± 0.06 h81.3 ± 4.3 b82.7 ± 4.2 b19.2 ± 1.7 bcd
T1102.0 ± 9.0 ab6.3 ± 0.3 ab332.9 ± 17.3 ab2.46 ± 0.03 b79.1 ± 2.8 b81.6 ± 2.8 b20.8 ± 2.4 bc
T288.2 ± 4.0 bc5.4 ± 0.1 cd345.4 ± 39.2 a2.92 ± 0.12 a80.3 ± 6.2 b83.2 ± 6.3 b21.2 ± 2.5 bc
T391.4 ± 7.6 bc6.4 ± 0.3 a370.7 ± 15.1 a2.01 ± 0.06 d89.0 ± 0.5 a91.0 ± 0.5 a26.2 ± 2.9 a
T493.4 ± 14.7 bc5.8 ± 0.7 bc321.6 ± 32.9 ab1.93 ± 0.08 de71.4 ± 3.0 c73.4 ± 3.0 c20.2 ± 2.3 bc
T587.2 ± 12.0 bc5.3 ± 0.2 d333.3 ± 24.9 ab1.84 ± 0.07 ef69.9 ± 1.1 c71.7 ± 1.2 c20.3 ± 1.5 bc
T699.1 ± 12.4 ab6.1 ± 0.4 ab362.6 ± 24.2 a2.33 ± 0.16 c81.3 ± 2.8 b83.6 ± 2.7 b22.4 ± 0.9 b
T782.8 ± 5.8 c4.7 ± 0.2 e288.0 ± 41.1 b1.79 ± 0.03 f54.0 ± 2.2 d55.7 ± 2.2 d16.4 ± 2.6 d
T878.7 ± 9.7 c4.9 ± 0.4 de287.7 ± 39.4 b1.65 ± 0.05 g57.4 ± 3.1 d59.0 ± 3.1 d18.0 ± 2.1 d
T992.7 ± 4.6 b5.9 ± 0.3 abc292.5 ± 27.9 b1.28 ± 0.04 i58.1 ± 2.1 d59.4 ± 2.1 d18.7 ± 1.7 cd
SL Stem length, SD Stem diameter, WPB Whole plant biomass, NSCAS NSCs accumulation in stem, NSCAR NSCs accumulation in root, NSCAT NSCs accumulation in total plant. SI Seedling index. Note: Different letters in the same column meant significant differences at 0.05 level (mean values ± SE, n = 4).
Table 3. The morphological and flowering quality differences in off-season potted tree peony flowers.
Table 3. The morphological and flowering quality differences in off-season potted tree peony flowers.
GroupsT0T1T2T3T4T5T6T7T8T9
PH/(cm)47.8 ± 5.4 a44.2 ± 6.2 ab42.0 ± 2.7 ab41.5 ± 4.7 abc43.8 ± 3.3 ab45.3 ± 7.1 ab41.8 ± 7.3 abc35.0 ± 4.1 bc34.0 ± 3.7 c43.3 ± 2.1 ab
CW/(cm)57.1 ± 4.6 ab56.5 ± 11.2 ab52.3 ± 5.4 ab55.8 ± 4.3 ab57.1 ± 9.1 ab59.1 ± 6.0 a60.3 ± 8.0 a48.0 ± 4.0 bc44.8 ± 3.7 c56.5 ± 4.3 b
BN/(N)1.8 ± 0.5 d2.3 ± 0.5 cd3.0 ± 1.1 abc3.0 ± 0.0 abc3.5 ± 0.6 ab3.8 ± 1.0 a3.5 ± 0.6 ab3.3 ± 0.5 abc3.5 ± 0.6 ab2.5 ± 0.6 bcd
SPAD38.3 ± 3.5 a33.4 ± 2.5 bcd35.5 ± 1.4 ab35.3 ± 1.1 ab34.0 ± 2.6 abc34.5 ± 2.2 abc35.5 ± 3.8 ab28.8 ± 4.6 d30.1 ± 2.3 cd32.5 ± 3.1 bcd
BD/(mm)8.45 ± 1.547.82 ± 0.597.60 ± 0.648.00 ± 0.608.05 ± 0.568.09 ± 0.567.61 ± 0.577.21 ± 0.967.58 ± 0.858.54 ± 0.47
LL/(cm)35.5 ± 4.2 a32.8 ± 2.6 ab31.6 ± 2.1 ab33.3 ± 3.1 ab34.1 ± 3.5 a36.5 ± 3.8 a32.1 ± 2.2 ab29.0 ± 3.3 b28.3 ± 2.3 b34.5 ± 2.7 a
LT/(mm)0.17 ± 0.010.17 ± 0.010.16 ± 0.010.16 ± 0.010.17 ± 0.010.15 ± 0.010.16 ± 0.010.17 ± 0.010.17 ± 0.010.17 ± 0.01
CWI1.20 ± 0.05 c1.27 ± 0.10 bc1.24 ± 0.08 bc1.35 ± 0.06 ab1.30 ± 0.12 bc1.32 ± 0.09 bc1.45 ± 0.07 a1.38 ± 0.09 ab1.32 ± 0.04 bc1.31 ± 0.07 bc
FNP/(N)1.8 ± 0.5 bc1.3 ± 0.5 bc1.8 ± 0.5 bc2.3 ± 0.5 ab2.0 ± 0.8 ab3.0 ± 0.1 a2.3 ± 1.0 ab1.0 ± 0.1 c1.8 ± 1.0 bc1.5 ± 0.6 bc
FD/(mm)189.2 ± 4.4 ab198.7 ± 2.8 a191.4 ± 12.0 ab181.7 ± 16.2 ab175.2 ± 20.1 abc188.5 ± 17.8 ab175.7 ± 21.6 abc150.6 ± 10.5 c156.7 ± 29.5 bc189.7 ± 15.4 a
L*49.6 ± 5.3 c50.3 ± 1.8 bc41.1 ± 3.3 d45.7 ± 5.7 cd48.8 ± 6.9 cd52.8 ± 5.9 abc52.4 ± 8.2 abc58.9 ± 1.9 a52.8 ± 5.7 abc58.1 ± 3.0 ab
a*25.2 ± 3.7 bc27.8 ± 0.6 bc32.1 ± 2.5 ab32.1 ± 1.2 a26.2 ± 5.0 bc21.8 ± 7.0 cd24.2 ± 7.9 bc19.4 ± 5.9 cd19.7 ± 6.6 cd17.4 ± 2.8 d
PAC/(U·g−1)24.7 ± 0.7 d29.3 ± 0.9 c40.6 ± 1.5 a34.2 ± 1.9 b28.9 ± 1.2 c21.5 ± 0.9 e34.0 ± 1.6 b19.4 ± 0.2 f19.5 ± 0.7 f16.3 ± 0.4 g
PFC/(mg·g−1)26.9 ± 1.5 d28.4 ± 0.7 cd32.0 ± 0.8 b34.9 ± 2.6 a30.5 ± 1.3 bc29.3 ± 0.5 cd34.9 ± 2.1 a26.7 ± 1.0 d27.0 ± 0.9 d27.8 ± 1.9 d
PSSC/(mg·g−1)36.3 ± 2.7 ab36.7 ± 2.4 ab33.2 ± 1.2 ab32.8 ± 1.3 ab37.4 ± 3.0 a32.1 ± 4.8 ab34.6 ± 2.6 ab32.8 ± 1.2 ab32.6 ± 5.4 ab28.6 ± 4.4 b
FI16.0 ± 1.4 cd16.8 ± 1.5 cd18.3 ± 2.5 ab19.8 ± 2.1 a17.0 ± 2.2 abc18.5 ± 0.6 ab19.0 ± 2.0 ab11.5 ± 1.9 e13.5 ± 2.7 de14.0 ± 1.4 de
PH Plant high, CW Crown width, BN branch number, SPAD SPAD value of leaves, BD Branch diameter, LL Leaf length, LT Leaf thickness, CWI Crown width index, FNP Flower number per plant, FD Flower diameter, L* value L*, a* value a*, PAC Petal anthocyanin content, PFC Petal flavonoid content, PSSC Petal soluble sugars content, FI Flowering index. Note: Different letters in the same column meant significant differences at 0.05 level (mean values ± SE, n = 4).
Table 4. Range analysis of flowering index of potted tree peony under forcing cultivation.
Table 4. Range analysis of flowering index of potted tree peony under forcing cultivation.
GroupsA/Root Pruning
(%)
B/Rooting Agent
(mg·L−1)
C/Metarhizium anisopliae
(million U·mL−1)
FI
T1252501016.8 ± 1.5
T2255001518.3 ± 2.5
T3257502019.8 ± 2.1
T4332501517.0 ± 2.2
T5335002018.5 ± 0.6
T6337501019.0 ± 2.0
T7502502011.5 ± 1.9
T8505001013.5 ± 2.7
T9507501514.0 ± 1.4
K118.1714.7516.08
K217.9216.7516.42
K313.0017.5816.58
R5.172.830.50
OrderA > B > C
Optimal combinationA1B3C3
Table 5. Experimental design of orthogonal.
Table 5. Experimental design of orthogonal.
GroupsA/Root Pruning
(%)
B/Rooting Agent
(mg·L−1)
C/Metarhizium anisopliae
(million U·mL−1)
T0 (Control)0 (No)0 (No)0 (No)
T125 (Slight)250 (Low)10 (Low)
T225 (Slight)500 (Moderate)15 (Moderate)
T325 (Slight)750 (High)20 (High)
T433 (Moderate)250 (Low)15 (Moderate)
T533 (Moderate)500 (Moderate)20 (High)
T633 (Moderate)750 (High)10 (Low)
T750 (Severe)250 (Low)20 (High)
T850 (Severe)500 (Moderate)10 (Low)
T950 (Severe)750 (High)15 (Moderate)
Table 6. The scoring criteria for potted tree peony flowers.
Table 6. The scoring criteria for potted tree peony flowers.
IndexesLevels
12345
a*<2121–2525–2929–33>33
FD/mm<155155–170170–185185–200>200
FNP/N.plant−112345
SPAD <3030–3232–3434–36>36
BN/N.plant−11234>5
CI<120123–130130–14040–150>150
According to the national standard of potted tree peony flowers classification, we divided six key ornamental characteristics into five levels (1–5) and gave corresponding scores.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Shi, S.; Shi, T.; Zhou, S.; Gao, S.; Zhao, Y.; Shi, G. Non-Structural Carbohydrates Accumulation in Seedlings Improved Flowering Quality of Tree Peony under Forcing Culture Conditions, with Roots Playing a Crucial Role. Plants 2024, 13, 2837. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants13202837

AMA Style

Shi S, Shi T, Zhou S, Gao S, Zhao Y, Shi G. Non-Structural Carbohydrates Accumulation in Seedlings Improved Flowering Quality of Tree Peony under Forcing Culture Conditions, with Roots Playing a Crucial Role. Plants. 2024; 13(20):2837. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants13202837

Chicago/Turabian Style

Shi, Shuaiying, Tian Shi, Shuang Zhou, Shuangcheng Gao, Yuan Zhao, and Guoan Shi. 2024. "Non-Structural Carbohydrates Accumulation in Seedlings Improved Flowering Quality of Tree Peony under Forcing Culture Conditions, with Roots Playing a Crucial Role" Plants 13, no. 20: 2837. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants13202837

APA Style

Shi, S., Shi, T., Zhou, S., Gao, S., Zhao, Y., & Shi, G. (2024). Non-Structural Carbohydrates Accumulation in Seedlings Improved Flowering Quality of Tree Peony under Forcing Culture Conditions, with Roots Playing a Crucial Role. Plants, 13(20), 2837. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants13202837

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop