Next Article in Journal
Karyotype Variability in Wild Narcissus poeticus L. Populations from Different Environmental Conditions in the Dinaric Alps
Next Article in Special Issue
Determination of the Allelic Composition of the sdw1/denso (HvGA20ox2), uzu1 (HvBRI1) and ari-e (HvDep1) Genes in Spring Barley Accessions from the VIR Collection
Previous Article in Journal
Influence of Organic and Inorganic Fertilizers on Tea Growth and Quality and Soil Properties of Tea Orchards’ Top Rhizosphere Soil
Previous Article in Special Issue
Drought Stress Response in Guar (Cyamopsis tetragonoloba (L.) Taub): Physiological and Molecular Genetic Aspects
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Involvement of Abscisic Acid in Transition of Pea (Pisum sativum L.) Seeds from Germination to Post-Germination Stages

1
Department of Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, St. Petersburg State University, 199034 St. Petersburg, Russia
2
Federal Research Center N.I. Vavilov All-Russian Institute of Plant Genetic Resources, 190000 St. Petersburg, Russia
3
Laboratory of Growth Regulators, The Czech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Experimental Botany & Palacky University, Faculty of Science, Slechtitelu 27, CZ-78371 Olomouc, Czech Republic
4
School of Advanced Engineering Studies, Novosibirsk State University, 630090 Novosibirsk, Russia
5
Rusagro Group of Companies, 115054 Moscow, Russia
6
Laboratory of Analytical Biochemistry and Biotechnology, K.A. Timiryazev Institute of Plant Physiology, Russian Academy of Sciences, 127276 Moscow, Russia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Plants 2024, 13(2), 206; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants13020206
Submission received: 8 December 2023 / Revised: 30 December 2023 / Accepted: 7 January 2024 / Published: 11 January 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Genetics and Genomics of Crop Breeding and Improvement)

Abstract

:
The transition from seed to seedling represents a critical developmental step in the life cycle of higher plants, dramatically affecting plant ontogenesis and stress tolerance. The release from dormancy to acquiring germination ability is defined by a balance of phytohormones, with the substantial contribution of abscisic acid (ABA), which inhibits germination. We studied the embryonic axis of Pisum sativum L. before and after radicle protrusion. Our previous work compared RNA sequencing-based transcriptomics in the embryonic axis isolated before and after radicle protrusion. The current study aims to analyze ABA-dependent gene regulation during the transition of the embryonic axis from the germination to post-germination stages. First, we determined the levels of abscisates (ABA, phaseic acid, dihydrophaseic acid, and neo-phaseic acid) using ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry. Second, we made a detailed annotation of ABA-associated genes using RNA sequencing-based transcriptome profiling. Finally, we analyzed the DNA methylation patterns in the promoters of the PsABI3, PsABI4, and PsABI5 genes. We showed that changes in the abscisate profile are characterized by the accumulation of ABA catabolites, and the ABA-related gene profile is accompanied by the upregulation of genes controlling seedling development and the downregulation of genes controlling water deprivation. The expression of ABI3, ABI4, and ABI5, which encode crucial transcription factors during late maturation, was downregulated by more than 20-fold, and their promoters exhibited high levels of methylation already at the late germination stage. Thus, although ABA remains important, other regulators seems to be involved in the transition from seed to seedling.

1. Introduction

In higher plants, seed production is crucial to species survival. Most seeds enter dormancy during late maturation and maintain this state until environmental conditions become favorable for germination [1,2]. The transition from dormancy to germination is influenced by a balance of phytohormones and significant environmental factors, such as temperature, water availability, and light [1,3]. This transition, occurring at the end of germination, involves extensive transcriptome reprogramming and signaling pathway alterations, leading to the silencing of seed maturation genes and activation of those for vegetative growth [4,5,6,7,8,9].
Whether seeds acquire the ability to germinate or remain dormant depends on the phytohormone balance [10,11,12]. Notably, abscisic acid (ABA) promotes seed dormancy and inhibits germination, while gibberellins (GAs) break seed dormancy and induce germination [13,14,15,16,17,18]. During early embryogenesis, ABA prevents seed abortion and promotes embryo growth, initially provided by the maternal tissues and later produced by the seeds themselves [18,19]. Consequently, the ABA level rises sharply late in embryogenesis, counteracting GAs and suppressing embryo growth [19].
As the embryo develops, it enlarges through cell elongation and accumulates storage compounds. ABA regulates the transport of monosaccharides and amino acids from maternal tissues and their conversion into stored forms like polysaccharides and proteins. In late maturation, metabolic processes slow down, and seeds desiccate and enter dormancy [20,21].
Numerous studies have shown that the decreasing ABA level is crucial for dormancy release and germination [7,12,19,22]. ABA degradation occurs through hydroxylation and conjugation, with ABA 8’-hydroxylases playing a key role in rapid ABA level decline during seed imbibition [17,23,24,25,26]. However, ABA’s signaling role during the seed-to-seedling transition remains unclear.
A key player in the seed transition from dormancy to germination is the LAFL regulatory network, comprising LEAFY COTYLEDON1 (LEC1) and LEC1-LIKE (L1L) of the NF-YB family transcription factors (TFs) and ABSCISIC ACID INSENSITIVE3 (ABI3), FUSCA3 (FUS3), and LEC2 (LEAFY COTYLEDON2) of the B3-AFL TF family [27,28,29]. The LAFL network, originating in a common ancestor of bryophytes and vascular plants, acts as a positive regulator of seed maturation genes but suppresses germination [30,31,32]. This network allows orthodox seeds to maintain desiccation tolerance during dormancy and germination [33,34,35,36]. Radicle protrusion marks the transition to the post-germination stage, with seeds becoming seedlings and losing desiccation tolerance [9,33,37]. This stage is typically associated with LAFL network silencing [5,32,34,38,39].
Our previous transcriptomic profiling of the P. sativum embryo axis before and after radicle protrusion revealed unexpected findings [4]. Although we anticipated the expression of LAFL network genes before radicle protrusion and their subsequent silencing, only PsABI3 showed significant expression in the seed axis. We also observed the expression of other ABA-related genes (PsABI4 and PsABI5). As result, ABI3, ABI4, and ABI5 were expressed in the embryonic axis before radicle protrusion but downregulated at the post-germination stage. Given that ABI3, ABI4, and ABI5 are central transcriptional factors in seed-specific events, including maturation, dormancy, longevity, germination, and post-germination growth [16,40,41], we propose that PsABI3, PsABI4, and PsABI5 also play a role in regulating the P. sativum seed-to-seedling transition [4,9].
Germination-related repression of the LAFL transcriptional network is due to epigenetic regulation of gene expression through DNA methylation and post-translational modifications of histones [5,8,32,42,43,44]. DNA methylation patterns change throughout seed development, germination, and seedling establishment [8,45,46,47,48,49,50,51,52,53,54,55]. DNA methylation occurs in three sequence contexts (CG, CHG, and CHH) and refers to the addition of a methyl group to the C5 position of cytosine to form 5-methylcytosine [56]. Methylation of CHH sites notably increases from early to late stages of seed development, then decreases during germination [8,49,50]. Two DNA methylases, RdDM (RNA directed DNA methylation) and CMT2 (DOMAINS REARRANGED METHYLTRANSFERASE 2), responsible for methylating CHH sites in developing seeds, are inactivated during germination [53,54]. In contrast, CG and CHG methylation patterns are relatively stable throughout seed development [47,48,57]. Therefore, monitoring the level of 5-methylcytosine (m5C) is considered as a universal marker for seeds at the different stages of their ontogenesis [46].
This study analyzes ABA metabolite profiles, ABA-associated gene expression, and DNA methylation in the promoters of PsABI3, PsABI4, and PsABI5 in the embryonic axis of germinated pea seeds before and after radicle protrusion. We discuss these findings in the context of ABA-dependent gene regulation during the seed-to-seedling transition.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Plant Material

Pea seeds of the commercial cultivar “Prima” were sourced from the N.I. Vavilov All-Russian Institute of Plant Genetic Resources, St. Petersburg, Russia. Seeds were imbibed for 72 h between layers of moist filter paper, then visually divided into two batches: (a) before embryonic root growth initiation (before radicle protrusion) and (b) post-initiation of root growth (after radicle protrusion). The seed axis from both batches was isolated, frozen in liquid nitrogen, homogenized, and stored at −80 °C before use in biochemical experiments and total genomic DNA extraction.

2.2. Quantitation of ABA and ABA-Related Metabolites

The selected plant hormones in the embryonic axis were quantified using ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography coupled with tandem mass spectrometry (UHPLC–MS/MS). The sample preparation and analysis were performed according to the modified protocol by Šimura and co-workers [58]. For the quantitation of ABA and ABA-related metabolites, 15 mg (fresh weight) of the homogenized plant material was extracted in 1 mL 60% (v/v) acetonitrile (ACN) with the addition of 5 pmol of [2H6]ABA as the internal standard. Four zirconium oxide 2.0 mm extraction beads (Next Advance, Troy, NY, USA) were added to the liquid sample. The sample was shaken in a Retsch MM400 bead mill (Retsch, Haan, Germany) at 27 Hz for 5 min, sonicated for 3 min, and incubated for half an hour at 4 °C. Afterwards, the sample was centrifuged at 20,000 rpm for 10 min at 4 °C (Allegra 64R benchtop centrifuge, Beckman Coulter, Brea, CA, USA). The supernatant was loaded onto an Oasis® HLB 30 mg/L cc extraction cartridge (Waters, Milford, CT, USA). The cartridge was subsequently washed with 0.5 mL 60% (v/v) ACN and 0.5 mL 30% (v/v) ACN. All fractions (the flow-through and both washes) were collected and dried under reduced pressure using a SpeedVac concentrator (RC1010 Centrivap Jouan, ThermoFisher, Waltham, MA, USA). The sample was reconstructed in 40 µL of 25% (v/v) ACN and 5 µL of the sample was injected onto an Acquity UPLC CSH C18 RP 150 × 2.1 mm, 1.7 μm chromatographic column (Waters, Milford, CT, USA). The UHPLC separation was performed using the Acquity UPLC I-Class System (Waters, Milford, CT, USA) coupled to a triple quadrupole tandem mass spectrometer (Xevo TQ-XS) equipped with electrospray ionization (Waters, Manchester, UK). The gradient elution and the MS/MS working in multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) mode followed previously published conditions, as described by Šimura et al. [58]. The obtained chromatographic peaks were evaluated in MassLynx V4.2 software (Waters, Manchester, UK). The targeted compounds were quantified using the isotope dilution method.

2.3. Annotation of ABA-Associated Genes

ABA-associated genes were annotated based on RNA sequencing-based transcriptome profiling [4]. Annotation was performed utilizing the Ensembl BioMart tool (https://plants.ensembl.org/biomart/martview (accessed on 23 August 2023)) and the URGI database (https://urgi.versailles.inra.fr/Species/Pisum (accessed on 23 August 2023)). Gene ontology (GO) terms, InterPro domains (https://www.ebi.ac.uk/interpro (accessed on 23 August 2023)), and Arabidopsis thaliana orthologs were identified for each gene [59]. Genes with a false-discovery rate (FDR) <0.05 and log base 2-transformed fold change (|logFC|) >2 were considered differentially expressed. Clustering was performed using the k-means algorithm, and the optimal number of clusters was determined using the Elbow method.

2.4. DNA Extraction and Sodium Bisulfite Treatment

Total genomic DNA from seeds at two developmental stages (before and after radicle protrusion) was extracted using the DNeasy Plant Mini Kit (QIAGEN, Düsseldorf, Germany), according to the manufacturer’s instructions (www.qiagen.com (accessed on 10 March 2022)). Sodium bisulfite treatment of 1 μg genomic DNA from each sample was conducted using the EpiTect Fast Bisulfite Kit (QIAGEN, Germany).

2.5. Primer Design and In Silico Analysis

Primers for amplifying bisulfite-treated DNA were designed against cytosine-converted sequences using SnapGene 6.1.2 (https://www.snapgene.com (accessed on 21 February 2022)). Prediction of CpG islands in the PsABI3, PsABI4, and PsABI5 promoter sequences was performed utilizing Meth-Primer 2.0 (https://www.urogene.org/methprimer2 (accessed on 21 February 2022)) and PlantPAN 3.0 (http://plantpan.itps.ncku.edu.tw/index.html (accessed on 25 February 2022)). Promoter mapping for transcription factor binding sites was performed using PlantPAN 3.0 and PCBase (http://pcbase.itps.ncku.edu.tw/index (accessed on 15 March 2022)), followed by filtering for stress and hormone response motifs at similar score = 1.

2.6. PCR, Electrophoretic Analysis, Extraction, and Purification

To amplify genomic and bisulfite-treated DNA, PCR was performed in a 50 μL mixture containing 70 ng of DNA template, 10 pM of each primer, and BioMaster HS-Taq PCR kit (2×) (BioLabMix, Novosibirsk, Russia) or Tersus Plus PCR kit (Evrogen, Moscow, Russia), according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The PCR conditions included an initial denaturation step at 94 °C for 5 min; followed by 35 cycles of denaturation at 94 °C for 1 min, annealing 50 °C for 1 min, and extension at 72 °C for 2 min; and a final elongation step at 72 °C for 5 min. The PCR screening of colonies was performed in a 25 μL mixture containing 10 pM of M13F and M13R primers (Evrogen, Russia), 0.25 mM of each dNTP, 1× reaction buffer (67 mM TrisHCl, pH 8.8; 2 mM MgCl2; 18 mM (NH4)2SO4; 0.01% Tween 20) and 0.5 U Taq polymerase (Syntol, Russia). After an initial denaturation at 95 °C for 15 min; 35 cycles were performed at 94 °C for 20 s, 55 °C for 30 s, and 72 °C for 1 min; followed by a final elongation at 72 °C for 5 min. Electrophoretic analysis was performed on 1% agarose gel (Helicon, Moscow, Russia) prepared on TAE buffer (Sigma-Aldrich, St., Louis, MO, USA) with ethidium bromide (VWR (Amresco), Cleveland, OH, USA). The amplified fragments were extracted from the gel using the MinElute Gel Extraction Kit (QIAGEN, Germany).

2.7. Cloning and Sequencing of the Amplified PCR Fragments

Freshly prepared PCR products were ligated with a vector using the Quick-TA kit (Evrogen, Russia), which included the pAL2-T vector, Quick-TA T4 DNA Ligase, buffer, M13 forward primer, and M13 reverse primer, according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Chemical transformation of competent Escherichia coli (Migula 1895) Castellani and Chalmers 1919 DH10B cells was then performed. Transformed colonies carrying inserts of the expected size were selected on selective LB medium (DIA-M, Moscow, Russia) with 100 µg/mL of ampicillin (BioChemica, PanReac Applichem, Spain). The purified amplified fragments were sequenced in both directions using M13 primers and the BigDye™ Terminator v3.1 Cycle Sequencing Kit (Applied Biosystems™, Waltham, MA, USA) on a 3500 Applied Biosystems Genetic Analyzer. For DNA methylation analysis, at least 10 clones were sequenced for each amplicon. The alignment of sequences was carried out using SnapGene 6.1.2 (https://www.snapgene.com/ (accessed on 10 December 2022)).

2.8. Statistical Analyses

Two-tailed t-tests (alpha = 0.05) were used to compare the means of ABA-related metabolites. Analysis was performed using MS Excel add-in, with data representing the mean ± standard error of 3 biological and 3 technical replicates (n = 9).

3. Results

3.1. Quantitation of ABA and ABA-Related Metabolites in the Pea Embryonic Axis before and after Radicle Protrusion

To delve deeper into ABA homeostasis, we examined the levels of ABA and its metabolites in the embryonic axis of germinated pea seeds, both before and after radicle protrusion. This axis encompasses the first true leaves, epicotyl, hypocotyl, and root (Figure 1).
We analyzed levels of abscisic acid (ABA), phaseic acid (PA), dihydrophaseic acid (DPA), neo-phaseic acid (neoPA), and 7′-hydroxy ABA (7′-OH-ABA). Notably, we observed an accumulation of PA and DPA, which are key products of ABA catabolism, against a backdrop of decreasing ABA level (Figure 2). Intriguingly, 7′-OH-ABA was not detected in the embryonic axis before or after radicle protrusion.

3.2. Categorization and Functional Annotation of ABA-Associated DEGs in the Pea Embryonic Axis before and after Radicle Protrusion

In our previous work, we performed RNA sequencing of the isolated embryonic axis before and after radicle protrusion [4]. Here, we provide a more detailed profile of ABA-associated differentially expressed genes (DEGs) annotated using the Pea Genome Assembly v1a from the UGRI server as the primary annotation source [60]. The differentially expressed genes were annotated using a BLASTX search against the A. thaliana (TAIR 10) protein database (with a threshold e-value < 10−9). GO and MapMan annotations were assigned based on A. thaliana homologous proteins. Singular enrichment analysis of the DEG lists was performed using the AgriGO v.2 toolkit [61]. GO terms with adjusted p-value < 0.05 were considered significantly enriched. We found 30 A. thaliana genes belonging to the GO term «Response to abscisic acid stimulus» and 70 orthologs in P. sativum.
Thus, a total of 70 ABA-associated DEGs were annotated in the pea embryonic axis. Among these, 46 genes showed higher expression and 24 genes showed lower expression after radicle protrusion by more than 4-fold (|logFC| > 2) (Figure 3 and Figure S1, Table S1).
ABA-dependent DEGs upregulated in the seed axis after radicle protrusion included those related to cellular signaling, stress resistance, membrane transporters, and TFs regulating developmental programs (Table S1). These genes encoded serine-threonine/tyrosine protein kinases CRK29 (Psat6g212040) and CIPK17 (Psat0s2012g0280), a protein phosphatase 2C family member (Psat7g017080), the α-subunit of G protein (Psat6g097080), and an inositol polyphosphate-related phosphatase (Psat4g078320). The expression of genes associated with the water deprivation response, antifungal proteins, and calcium signaling also significantly increased. The expression of Psat6g199400 encoding protein RD29B/LTI65 increased 4.5-fold, that of Psat5g266320 encoding antifungal protein ginkbilobin-2 increased 5–8-fold, and that of Psat4g146960 encoding calcium signaling protein ANNEXIN4 increased 9-fold. Genes responsible for the synthesis of membrane transporters included Psat4g117800 (encoding P-ATPase) and Psat4g184760 (encoding potassium channel AKT2/3). The expression of Psat2g121520 (encoding TCP15 protein) increased 8-fold.
Conversely, the downregulated DEGs included key ABA-response genes like ABI5 (Psat3g033680), ABI3 (Psat3g142040), ABI4 (Psat2g031240), LTI65 (Psat0s2227g0040), LTP4 (Psat7g227120), HVA22E (Psat5g052360), and RD22 (Psat6g033920 and Psat6g033960) (Table S1). These genes are highly conserved across functional domains, with ABI4, ABI5, and HVA22E exhibiting sequence homology in various drought-tolerant species [4]. These genes may play a crucial role in dehydration tolerance during the transition from seed germination to seedling establishment.

3.3. DNA Methylation in the Promoters of the PsABI3, PsABI4, and PsABI5 Genes

We selected the PsABI3 gene along with newly identified drought-responsive genes PsABI4 and PsABI5 for epigenetic analysis. These genes were identified in the P. sativum genome and sequenced from the commercial cultivar “Prima” (Table S2).
In silico analysis of the promoters and first exons (including 5′-UTR) of PsABI3, PsABI4, and PsABI5 revealed low GC composition (29%, 34%, and 23% respectively), with only individual CpG sites predicted and no CpG islands detected (Figure S2). Considering that plant DNA methylation can occur at CpG, CpHpG, and CpHpH sites, we designed primers for bisulfite sequencing (with conversion of unmethylated C to T) of both CpG and non-CpG sites (Table S2).
To analyze the methylation profile of the promoters and the beginning of the first exons of the PsABI3, PsABI4 and PsABI5 genes, we performed amplification of the bisulfite-treated DNA using designed primers (Table S3). Bisulfite-treated DNA amplification and subsequent cloning revealed methylation in the promoters of PsABI3, PsABI4, and PsABI5 already before radicle protrusion (Figure 4).
Additionally, we mapped the promoters of these genes to compare potential methylation sites and binding sites for TFs (Table S4). Notably, the PsABI4 promoter had the lowest number of TF binding sites, while the PsABI5 promoter contained numerous potential LAFL protein binding sites, along with motifs associated with responses to cold and water deprivation.

4. Discussion

4.1. ABA Catabolism

ABA plays vital roles in seed development and maturation, encompassing the accumulation of storage compounds, acquisition of desiccation tolerance, induction of dormancy, and suppression of precocious germination [12,17,18,19,62,63,64]. However, to break dormancy and initiate germination, ABA needs to be catabolized, primarily through hydroxylation and conjugation. The primary ABA hydroxylation route is the ABA catabolic pathway (Figure 5), which relies on the activities of CYP707A cytochrome P450, notably ABA 8′-hydroxylases [65].
Initially, ABA is catalyzed by 8′-hydroxylase, converting it to 8′-hydroxy ABA (8′-OH ABA), an unstable intermediate [66,67]. This intermediate is then spontaneously rearranged into PA and subsequently reduced by PA reductase (PAR) to DPA [24,68]. The 9′-hydroxylation pathway, similar to 8′-hydroxylation, involves CYP707A enzymes and converts 9′-hydroxy ABA (9′-OH ABA) to neoPA with both 8′-C and 9′-C hydroxylation catalyzed by the same enzyme [16]. Recently, Bai et al. (2022) [24] identified a downstream catabolite of neoPA in the 9′-hydroxylation pathway as epi-neodihydrophaseic acid (epi-neoDPA) and discovered the responsible enzyme, neoPA reductase 1 (NeoPAR1) (Figure 5).
Our study examined ABA and ABA-related catabolites in the embryonic axis of P. sativum seeds before and after radicle protrusion. We found a decline in ABA content with a concurrent rise in levels of its catabolites (PA, DPA, and neoPA) (Figure 2). Intriguingly, PA, similar to ABA, can regulate stomatal closure and suppress seed germination [69,70]. Weng et al. (2016) demonstrated that PA functions as a signaling molecule through ABA receptors. Similar ABA-like hormonal activity was observed for neoPA, but not for epi-neoDPA [24]. Additionally, altered seed germination patterns were noted in neo-PAR1 mutant and overexpression lines, implicating the ABA catabolic pathway as a critical regulatory mechanism during the seed-to-seedling transition [24]. Despite the reduced ABA level, the accumulation of its catabolic products (PA and neoDPA) in the embryonic axis suggests a continued regulatory influence via ABA receptors.

4.2. Annotation of ABA-Associated DEGs

In our prior RNA sequencing-based transcriptomic analysis of the pea embryonic axis isolated from seeds before and after radicle protrusion [4], we identified 24,184 DEGs, with 2101 showing notably higher expression. This work extends that analysis by focusing on ABA-associated DEGs (ABA-DEGs). Of the 70 ABA-DEGs annotated, 46 genes were upregulated and 24 genes were downregulated by more than 4-fold after radicle protrusion (Figure 3).
The upregulated ABA-DEGs predominantly pertained to cellular signaling, stress resistance, membrane transporters, and transcription factors that regulate seedling development. For instance, Psat6g199400, encoding RD29B/LTI65, which responds to water deprivation, was upregulated 4.5-fold. This gene’s promoter region contains two ABA-responsive elements (ABREs) that require cis-acting elements for the dehydration-responsive expression of RD29B/LTI65 [71,72]. Similarly, Psat4g146960, encoding ANNEXIN4, a calcium-binding protein involved in drought and other stress responses [73,74], showed a 9-fold increase in expression (Table S1).
Among the upregulated genes were those coding for membrane transporters like Psat4g117800 (P-ATPase) and Psat4g184760 (potassium channel AKT2/3). P-type ATPases play a role in ion transport across membranes, utilizing ATP for transmembrane conformational changes [75,76]. Additionally, Psat2g121520, encoding TCP15, a transcription factor implicated in cell expansion and proliferation [77,78], was upregulated 8-fold. The TCP proteins, known as TEOSINTE BRANCHED 1 (TB1) in maize, CYCLOIDEA (CYC) in Anthirrinum majus, and PCF in rice [79], have been linked to various developmental processes, including light-induced cotyledon opening in Arabidopsis [80].
Conversely, the downregulated ABA-DEGs included genes central to ABA signaling (ABI3, ABI4, and ABI5) and those involved in the water deprivation response (LEA14, RD22, HVA22, PER1, and LTI65) (Table S1). Seed germination is governed by the antagonistic balance of ABA/GA, with ABA catabolism preceding GA synthesis and activation [5,7,17]. Key ABA signaling genes ABI3, ABI4, and ABI5 encode the TFs featuring B3, AP2, and bZIP domains, which control the expression of ABA-responsive genes crucial for seed maturation, dormancy, longevity, germination, and post-germination growth ([12,16,81,82,83].
ABI5 encodes a member of the basic leucine zipper TF family and is involved in ABA signaling in seeds by acting as a signal integrator between ABA and other hormones [41,84,85]. Arabidopsis abi5 mutants have pleiotropic defects in the ABA response, including reduced sensitivity to ABA, inhibition of germination, and altered expression of some ABA-regulated genes [86,87]. Notably, Psat3g033680, encoding ABI5, exhibited 22-fold downregulation after radicle protrusion.
ABI4 was shown to be a key integration node for multiple signals participating in critical transition steps during plant ontogenesis [88,89,90]. In dormant seeds, ABI4 acts as a repressor of ABA catabolism by binding to the promoter of CYP707A, being the main enzyme of ABA catabolism [91]. Thereby, ABA and GAs can antagonistically modify the expression and stability of ABI4, suggesting the existence of regulatory loops [88]. In germinating seeds, ABI4 can regulate both ABA synthesis and catabolism. Some authors suggest that ABI4 is a key regulator of the balance between ABA and GAs in seeds at the post-germination stage [88,90]. In our study, the level of the Psat2g031240 gene encoding ABI4 was decreased 21-fold.
ABI3 encodes AP2/B3-like transcriptional factor family protein [92]. ABI3 belongs to the LAFL regulatory network, where it interacts with LEAFY COTYLEDON1 (LEC1), ABSCISIC ACID INSENSITIVE3 (ABI3), FUSCA3 (FUS3), and LEC2 [31,32]. The LAFL network is a positive regulator of seed dormancy and needs to be suppressed for seed germination. Together, ABI3, FUS3, and LEC1 are involved in the sensitivity of seeds to ABA and regulate expression of the 12S storage protein gene family [93]. In addition, both FUS3 and LEC1 positively regulate ABI3 protein abundance in seeds [94]. The expression of Psat3g142040, encoding ABI3, was decreased 21-fold.
We also found the downregulation of ABA-dependent genes involved in the response to water deprivation (LEA14, RD22, HVA22, PER1, and LTI65) (Table S1). In accordance with our findings, Psat7g085840 encoding peroxiredoxin1 (PER1), Psat0s2227g0040 encoding protein LTI65/78, and Psat0s2780g0040 encoding late embryogenesis abundant (LEA) protein were downregulated 20–30-fold. Peroxiredoxins are thiol-dependent antioxidants containing one (1-Cys) or two (2-Cys) conserved Cys residues [95]. PER1 encodes a 1-Cys peroxiredoxin (PER1) protein that accumulates during seed development but rapidly disappears upon germination [96]. PER1 is involved in the quenching of reactive oxygen species (ROS) during late maturation, dormancy, and early germination, thereby maintaining seed viability [96,97,98]. The low temperature-induced (LTI) protein family is associated with responses to abiotic stresses. In Arabidopsis, homologous genes RD29A (LTI78) and RD29B (LTI65) are induced by cold, drought, salt, and abscisic acid [71]. Most LEA genes have ABA response elements in their promoters and their expression can be induced not only by ABA, but also by cold or drought. Desiccation-related protein LEA14 belongs to the group II LEA proteins, also known as dehydrins [99]. LEA14 is induced in response to salt and low temperature [100].

4.3. Epigenetic Regulation of the PsABI3, PsABI4, and PsABI5 Genes Based on DNA Promoter Methylation

Major transitions in the plant life cycle require fine-tuned regulation at the molecular and cellular levels. Epigenetic regulation, particularly DNA methylation, is crucial for maintaining genome stability in plants by inhibiting transposable element movement and modulating gene expression during development and stress responses [8,56]. DNA methylation patterns in seeds undergo significant changes during their development and germination [8,46,47,48,49,52,54].
Our study reveals that during the transition from germination to post-germination, the expression of key ABA signaling pathway genes (ABI3, ABI4, and ABI5) is markedly suppressed. We analyzed the DNA promoter methylation profiles of PsABI3, PsABI4, and PsABI5 to understand their epigenetic regulation. Contrary to our expectations of low promoter methylation levels based on their expression before radicle protrusion [4], we observed high methylation levels both before and after this developmental stage (Figure 4). Notably, approximately one-third of the PsABI3 gene promoter region showed reduced methylation. However, this region might belong to the 5′-UTR as per the Pea Genome International Consortium version 1a (Figure S3, pink).
We further investigated the coincidence of epigenetic markers with transcription factor binding sites in the promoters of these genes using PlantPAN 3.0 and PCBase, focusing on stress and hormone response motifs. PsABI5 showed numerous potential binding sites for LAFL network proteins, along with motifs associated with cold and water deprivation responses (Figure S4). This finding aligns with the role of ABI5 as a major regulator of seed maturation and longevity in legumes [41]. Our results suggest that epigenetic modifications impacting the binding ability of ABI3, ABI4, and ABI5 to DNA promoters occur prior to initiation of the seed transition from germination to post-germination.
Thus, our study provides insight into the involvement of ABA in the transition of P. sativum from the germination to post-germination stages when seeds turn into seedlings. The initiation of embryonic axis growth corresponds with changes in the abscisate profile: a decrease in the ABA level and an accumulation of its catabolites (PA, DPA, and neoPA), which possess hormonal activity similar to ABA [24,101]. Our in-depth analysis of ABA-DEGs revealed 46 upregulated and 24 downregulated genes with more than 4-fold changes. Most upregulated ABA-DEGs were related to the regulation of seedling development. Most notably, the expression of ABI3, ABI4, and ABI5 was significantly downregulated, and their promoters exhibited high levels of methylation both before and after radicle protrusion. While ABA continues to be important, other regulators appear to be involved in the seed-to-seedling transition.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/plants13020206/s1, Figure S1: Expression heatmap of ABA-associated DEGs in the embryonic axis of P. sativum before and after radicle protrusion (RP); Figure S2: Predicted methylation sites for CpG motifs in the sequences of seed resistance to dehydration genes in the P. sativum genome; Figure S3: Mapping of the PsABI3 gene promoter; Figure S4: Mapping of the PsABI4 gene promoter; Figure S5: Mapping of the PsABI5 gene promoter; Table S1: Annotation of ABA-associated genes in the transcriptome of the P. sativum embryonic axis; Table S2: The ABA-dependent genes of P. sativum seeds selected for analysis of DNA methylation in the promoters; Table S3: Primers used for amplification of gene promoter regions from bisulfite-treated DNA isolated from the embryonic axis of P. sativum; Table S4: Functions of transcription factors, the binding sites of which were identified in the gene promoter regions of PsABI3, PsABI4, and PsABI5 [102,103,104,105].

Author Contributions

G.S. and S.M. conceived the project. E.K. (Ekaterina Krylova), P.V. and I.P. performed the experiments. K.S., E.K. (Ekaterina Krylova) and A.V. analyzed the data. G.S., K.S. and S.M. wrote the manuscript. M.S., A.F. and E.K. (Elena Khlestkina) reviewed and edited the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Russian Science Foundation, grant no. 20-16-00086 (50% of the study dealing with annotation of ABA-associated DEGs and DNA methylation in the promoters of the ABA-depended genes), the grant IGA from Palacky University no. IGA PrF_2023_031 (25% of the study dealing with quantitation of ABA and ABA-related metabolites) and the K.A. Timiryazev Institute of Plant Physiology, Russian Academy of Sciences, theme no. 1021052706080-4-1.6.11 (25% of the study dealing with the bioinformatics and preparing the plant material).

Data Availability Statement

Data are contained within the article and supplementary materials.

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to Tatiana Leonova and Alena Kusnetsova for their help in preparing the plant material for phytohormone analysis.

Conflicts of Interest

Author Ksenia Strygina was employed by the Rusagro Group of Companies. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

References

  1. Chahtane, H.; Kim, W.; Lopez-Molina, L. Primary seed dormancy: A temporally multilayered riddle waiting to be unlocked. J. Exp. Bot. 2016, 68, erw377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Yan, A.; Chen, Z. The control of seed dormancy and germination by temperature, light and nitrate. Bot. Rev. 2020, 86, 39–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Bentsink, L.; Koornneef, M. Seed dormancy and germination. Arab. B. 2008, 6, e0119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Smolikova, G.; Strygina, K.; Krylova, E.; Vikhorev, A.; Bilova, T.; Frolov, A.; Khlestkina, E.; Medvedev, S. Seed-to-seedling transition in Pisum sativum L.: A transcriptomic approach. Plants 2022, 11, 1686. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Smolikova, G.; Strygina, K.; Krylova, E.; Leonova, T.; Frolov, A.; Khlestkina, E.; Medvedev, S. Transition from seeds to seedlings: Hormonal and epigenetic aspects. Plants 2021, 10, 1884. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Silva, A.T.; Ligterink, W.; Hilhorst, H.W.M. Metabolite profiling and associated gene expression reveal two metabolic shifts during the seed-to-seedling transition in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Mol. Biol. 2017, 95, 481–496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Carrera-Castaño, G.; Calleja-Cabrera, J.; Pernas, M.; Gómez, L.; Oñate-Sánchez, L. An updated overview on the regulation of seed germination. Plants 2020, 9, 703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Luján-Soto, E.; Dinkova, T.D. Time to wake up: Epigenetic and small-RNA-mediated regulation during seed germination. Plants 2021, 10, 236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Smolikova, G.; Medvedev, S. Seed-to-seedling transition: Novel aspects. Plants 2022, 11, 1988. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Finkelstein, R.R. The role of hormones during seed development and germination. In Plant Hormones; Davies, P.J., Ed.; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2010; pp. 549–573. ISBN 978-1-4020-2684-3. [Google Scholar]
  11. Shu, K.; Meng, Y.J.; Shuai, H.W.; Liu, W.G.; Du, J.B.; Liu, J.; Yang, W.Y. Dormancy and germination: How does the crop seed decide? Plant Biol. 2015, 17, 1104–1112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Ali, F.; Qanmber, G.; Li, F.; Wang, Z. Updated role of ABA in seed maturation, dormancy, and germination. J. Adv. Res. 2022, 35, 199–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Shu, K.; Liu, X.; Xie, Q.; He, Z. Two faces of one seed: Hormonal regulation of dormancy and germination. Mol. Plant 2016, 9, 34–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Yan, A.; Chen, Z. The pivotal role of abscisic acid signaling during transition from seed maturation to germination. Plant Cell Rep. 2017, 36, 689–703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Hauvermale, A.L.; Steber, C.M. GA signaling is essential for the embryo-to-seedling transition during Arabidopsis seed germination, a ghost story. Plant Signal. Behav. 2020, 15, 1705028. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Chen, K.; Li, G.; Bressan, R.A.; Song, C.; Zhu, J.; Zhao, Y. Abscisic acid dynamics, signaling, and functions in plants. J. Integr. Plant Biol. 2020, 62, 25–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Sano, N.; Marion-Poll, A. ABA metabolism and homeostasis in seed dormancy and germination. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 5069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Finkelstein, R. Abscisic acid synthesis and response. Arab. Book 2013, 11, e0166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Nambara, E.; Okamoto, M.; Tatematsu, K.; Yano, R.; Seo, M.; Kamiya, Y. Abscisic acid and the control of seed dormancy and germination. Seed Sci. Res. 2010, 20, 55–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Gutierrez, L.; Van Wuytswinkel, O.; Castelain, M.; Bellini, C. Combined networks regulating seed maturation. Trends Plant Sci. 2007, 12, 294–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Finkelstein, R.; Reeves, W.; Ariizumi, T.; Steber, C. Molecular aspects of seed dormancy. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2008, 59, 387–415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Finch-Savage, W.E.; Leubner-Metzger, G. Seed dormancy and the control of germination. New Phytol. 2006, 171, 501–523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Nambara, E.; Marion-Poll, A. Abscisic acid biosynthesis and catabolism. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2005, 56, 165–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Bai, Y.-L.; Yin, X.; Xiong, C.-F.; Cai, B.-D.; Wu, Y.; Zhang, X.-Y.; Wei, Z.; Ye, T.; Feng, Y.-Q. Neophaseic acid catabolism in the 9′-hydroxylation pathway of abscisic acid in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Commun. 2022, 3, 100340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Kushiro, T.; Okamoto, M.; Nakabayashi, K.; Yamagishi, K.; Kitamura, S.; Asami, T.; Hirai, N.; Koshiba, T.; Kamiya, Y.; Nambara, E. The Arabidopsis cytochrome P450 CYP707A encodes ABA 8′-hydroxylases: Key enzymes in ABA catabolism. EMBO J. 2004, 23, 1647–1656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Okamoto, M.; Kuwahara, A.; Seo, M.; Kushiro, T.; Asami, T.; Hirai, N.; Kamiya, Y.; Koshiba, T.; Nambara, E. CYP707A1 and CYP707A2, which encode abscisic acid 8′-hydroxylases, are indispensable for proper control of seed dormancy and germination in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 2006, 141, 97–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Carbonero, P.; Iglesias-Fernández, R.; Vicente-Carbajosa, J. The AFL subfamily of B3 transcription factors: Evolution and function in angiosperm seeds. J. Exp. Bot. 2016, 68, erw458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Han, J.-D.; Li, X.; Jiang, C.-K.; Wong, G.K.-S.; Rothfels, C.J.; Rao, G.-Y. Evolutionary analysis of the LAFL genes involved in the land plant seed maturation program. Front. Plant Sci. 2017, 8, 439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Roscoe, T.T.; Guilleminot, J.; Bessoule, J.-J.; Berger, F.; Devic, M. Complementation of seed maturation phenotypes by ectopic expression of ABSCISIC ACID INSENSITIVE3, FUSCA3 and LEAFY COTYLEDON2 in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell Physiol. 2015, 56, 1215–1228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Cagliari, A.; Turchetto-Zolet, A.C.; Korbes, A.P.; Maraschin, F.d.S.; Margis, R.; Margis-Pinheiro, M. New insights on the evolution of Leafy cotyledon1 (LEC1) type genes in vascular plants. Genomics 2014, 103, 380–387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Jia, H.; Suzuki, M.; McCarty, D.R. Regulation of the seed to seedling developmental phase transition by the LAFL and VAL transcription factor networks. WIREs Dev. Biol. 2014, 3, 135–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Lepiniec, L.; Devic, M.; Roscoe, T.J.; Bouyer, D.; Zhou, D.-X.; Boulard, C.; Baud, S.; Dubreucq, B. Molecular and epigenetic regulations and functions of the LAFL transcriptional regulators that control seed development. Plant Reprod. 2018, 31, 291–307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Faria, J.M.R.; Buitink, J.; van Lammeren, A.A.M.; Hilhorst, H.W.M. Changes in DNA and microtubules during loss and re-establishment of desiccation tolerance in germinating Medicago truncatula seeds. J. Exp. Bot. 2005, 56, 2119–2130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Dekkers, B.J.W.; Costa, M.C.D.; Maia, J.; Bentsink, L.; Ligterink, W.; Hilhorst, H.W.M. Acquisition and loss of desiccation tolerance in seeds: From experimental model to biological relevance. Planta 2015, 241, 563–577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Smolikova, G.; Leonova, T.; Vashurina, N.; Frolov, A.; Medvedev, S. Desiccation tolerance as the basis of long-term seed viability. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 22, 101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Sano, N.; Lounifi, I.; Cueff, G.; Collet, B.; Clément, G.; Balzergue, S.; Huguet, S.; Valot, B.; Galland, M.; Rajjou, L. Multi-omics approaches unravel specific features of embryo and endosperm in rice seed germination. Front. Plant Sci. 2022, 13, 867263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Buitink, J.; Ly Vu, B.; Satour, P.; Leprince, O. The re-establishment of desiccation tolerance in germinated radicles of Medicago truncatula Gaertn. seeds. Seed Sci. Res. 2003, 13, 273–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Tsukagoshi, H.; Saijo, T.; Shibata, D.; Morikami, A.; Nakamura, K. Analysis of a sugar response mutant of Arabidopsis identified a novel B3 domain protein that functions as an active transcriptional repressor. Plant Physiol. 2005, 138, 675–685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Tsukagoshi, H.; Morikami, A.; Nakamura, K. Two B3 domain transcriptional repressors prevent sugar-inducible expression of seed maturation genes in Arabidopsis seedlings. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2007, 104, 2543–2547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Zinsmeister, J.; Lalanne, D.; Ly Vu, B.; Schoefs, B.; Marchand, J.; Dang, T.T.; Buitink, J.; Leprince, O. ABSCISIC ACID INSENSITIVE4 coordinates eoplast formation to ensure acquisition of seed longevity during maturation in Medicago truncatula. Plant J. 2023, 113, 934–953. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Zinsmeister, J.; Lalanne, D.; Terrasson, E.; Chatelain, E.; Vandecasteele, C.; Vu, B.L.; Dubois-Laurent, C.; Geoffriau, E.; Signor, C.L.; Dalmais, M.; et al. ABI5 is a regulator of seed maturation and longevity in legumes. Plant Cell 2016, 28, 2735–2754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Molitor, A.M.; Bu, Z.; Yu, Y.; Shen, W.-H. Arabidopsis AL PHD-PRC1 complexes promote seed germination through H3K4me3-to-H3K27me3 chromatin state switch in repression of seed developmental genes. PLoS Genet. 2014, 10, e1004091. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Mozgova, I.; Köhler, C.; Hennig, L. Keeping the gate closed: Functions of the polycomb repressive complex PRC2 in development. Plant J. 2015, 83, 121–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Ding, X.; Jia, X.; Xiang, Y.; Jiang, W. Histone modification and chromatin remodeling during the seed life cycle. Front. Plant Sci. 2022, 13, 865361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Xing, M.-Q.; Zhang, Y.-J.; Zhou, S.-R.; Hu, W.-Y.; Wu, X.-T.; Ye, Y.-J.; Wu, X.-X.; Xiao, Y.-P.; Li, X.; Xue, H.-W. Global analysis reveals the crucial roles of DNA methylation during rice seed development. Plant Physiol. 2015, 168, 1417–1432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Michalak, M.; Plitta-Michalak, B.P.; Suszka, J.; Naskręt-Barciszewska, M.Z.; Kotlarski, S.; Barciszewski, J.; Chmielarz, P. Identification of DNA methylation changes in European beech seeds during desiccation and storage. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 3557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. An, Y.C.; Goettel, W.; Han, Q.; Bartels, A.; Liu, Z.; Xiao, W. Dynamic changes of genome-wide DNA methylation during soybean seed development. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 12263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Narsai, R.; Gouil, Q.; Secco, D.; Srivastava, A.; Karpievitch, Y.V.; Liew, L.C.; Lister, R.; Lewsey, M.G.; Whelan, J. Extensive transcriptomic and epigenomic remodelling occurs during Arabidopsis thaliana germination. Genome Biol. 2017, 18, 172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Bouyer, D.; Kramdi, A.; Kassam, M.; Heese, M.; Schnittger, A.; Roudier, F.; Colot, V. DNA methylation dynamics during early plant life. Genome Biol. 2017, 18, 179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Lee, J.; Lee, S.; Park, K.; Shin, S.-Y.; Frost, J.M.; Hsieh, P.-H.; Shin, C.; Fischer, R.L.; Hsieh, T.-F.; Choi, Y. Distinct regulatory pathways contribute to dynamic CHH methylation patterns in transposable elements throughout Arabidopsis embryogenesis. Front. Plant Sci. 2023, 14, 1204279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Li, W.-Y.; Chen, B.-X.; Chen, Z.-J.; Gao, Y.-T.; Chen, Z.; Liu, J. Reactive oxygen species generated by NADPHoxidases promote radicle protrusion and root elongation during rice seed germination. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2017, 18, 110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Gomez-Cabellos, S.; Toorop, P.E.; Cañal, M.J.; Iannetta, P.P.M.; Fernández-Pascual, E.; Pritchard, H.W.; Visscher, A.M. Global DNA methylation and cellular 5-methylcytosine and H4 acetylated patterns in primary and secondary dormant seeds of Capsella bursa-pastoris (L.) Medik. (shepherd’s purse). Protoplasma 2022, 259, 595–614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Dew-Budd, K.J.; Chow, H.T.; Kendall, T.; David, B.C.; Rozelle, J.A.; Mosher, R.A.; Beilstein, M.A. Mating system is associated with seed phenotypes upon loss of RNA-directed DNA methylation in Brassicaceae. Plant Physiol. 2023, kiad622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Kawakatsu, T.; Nery, J.R.; Castanon, R.; Ecker, J.R. Dynamic DNA methylation reconfiguration during seed development and germination. Genome Biol. 2017, 18, 171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Bartels, A.; Han, Q.; Nair, P.; Stacey, L.; Gaynier, H.; Mosley, M.; Huang, Q.; Pearson, J.; Hsieh, T.-F.; An, Y.-Q.; et al. Dynamic DNA methylation in plant growth and development. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 2144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Kawakatsu, T.; Ecker, J.R. Diversity and dynamics of DNA methylation: Epigenomic resources and tools for crop breeding. Breed. Sci. 2019, 69, 191–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Lin, J.-Y.; Le, B.H.; Chen, M.; Henry, K.F.; Hur, J.; Hsieh, T.-F.; Chen, P.-Y.; Pelletier, J.M.; Pellegrini, M.; Fischer, R.L.; et al. Similarity between soybean and Arabidopsis seed methylomes and loss of non-CG methylation does not affect seed development. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2017, 114, E9730–E9739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Šimura, J.; Antoniadi, I.; Široká, J.; Tarkowská, D.; Strnad, M.; Ljung, K.; Novák, O. Plant hormonomics: Multiple phytohormone profiling by targeted metabolomics. Plant Physiol. 2018, 177, 476–489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Ge, S.X.; Son, E.W.; Yao, R. iDEP: An integrated web application for differential expression and pathway analysis of RNA-Seq data. BMC Bioinform. 2018, 19, 534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Kreplak, J.; Madoui, M.; Cápal, P.; Novák, P.; Labadie, K.; Aubert, G.; Bayer, P.E.; Gali, K.K.; Syme, R.A.; Main, D.; et al. A reference genome for pea provides insight into legume genome evolution. Nat. Genet. 2019, 51, 1411–1422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Tian, T.; Liu, Y.; Yan, H.; You, Q.; Yi, X.; Du, Z.; Xu, W.; Su, Z. agriGO v2.0: A GO analysis toolkit for the agricultural community, 2017 update. Nucleic Acids Res. 2017, 45, W122–W129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Zhou, W.; Chen, F.; Luo, X.; Dai, Y.; Yang, Y.; Zheng, C.; Yang, W.; Shu, K. A matter of life and death: Molecular, physiological, and environmental regulation of seed longevity. Plant. Cell Environ. 2020, 43, 293–302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Graeber, K.; Nakabayashi, K.; Miatton, E.; Leubner-Metzger, G.; Soppe, W.J.J. Molecular mechanisms of seed dormancy. Plant. Cell Environ. 2012, 35, 1769–1786. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Kanno, Y.; Jikumaru, Y.; Hanada, A.; Nambara, E.; Abrams, S.R.; Kamiya, Y.; Seo, M. Comprehensive hormone profiling in developing Arabidopsis seeds: Examination of the site of ABA biosynthesis, ABA transport and hormone interactions. Plant Cell Physiol. 2010, 51, 1988–2001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Saito, S.; Hirai, N.; Matsumoto, C.; Ohigashi, H.; Ohta, D.; Sakata, K.; Mizutani, M. Arabidopsis CYP707A s encode (+)-abscisic acid 8′-hydroxylase, a key enzyme in the oxidative catabolism of abscisic acid. Plant Physiol. 2004, 134, 1439–1449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Milborrow, B.V.; Vaughan, G.T. Characterization of dihydrophaseic acid 4′-O-β-D-glucopyranoside as a major metabolite of abscisic acid. Funct. Plant Biol. 1982, 9, 361–372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Cai, W.-J.; Zeng, C.; Zhang, X.-Y.; Ye, T.; Feng, Y.-Q. A structure–guided screening strategy for the discovery and identification of potential gibberellins from plant samples using liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry assisted by chemical isotope labeling. Anal. Chim. Acta 2021, 1163, 338505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Zeevaart, J.A.D.; Milborrow, B. V Metabolism of abscisic acid and the occurrence of epi-dihydrophaseic acid in Phaseolus vulgaris. Phytochemistry 1976, 15, 493–500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Sharkey, T.D.; Raschke, K. Effects of phaseic acid and dihydrophaseic acid on stomata and the photosynthetic apparatus. Plant Physiol. 1980, 65, 291–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Walker-Simmons, M.K.; Holappa, L.D.; Abrams, G.D.; Abrams, S.R. ABA metabolites induce group 3 LEA mRNA and inhibit germination in wheat. Physiol. Plant. 1997, 100, 474–480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Msanne, J.; Lin, J.; Stone, J.M.; Awada, T. Characterization of abiotic stress-responsive Arabidopsis thaliana RD29A and RD29B genes and evaluation of transgenes. Planta 2011, 234, 97–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Liu, W.; Thapa, P.; Park, S.-W. RD29A and RD29B rearrange genetic and epigenetic markers in priming systemic defense responses against drought and salinity. Plant Sci. 2023, 337, 111895. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Medvedev, S.S. Principles of calcium signal generation and transduction in plant cells. Russ. J. Plant Physiol. 2018, 65, 771–783. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Li, J.; Yang, Y. How do plants maintain pH and ion homeostasis under saline-alkali stress? Front. Plant Sci. 2023, 14, 1217193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Dyla, M.; Basse Hansen, S.; Nissen, P.; Kjaergaard, M. Structural dynamics of P-type ATPase ion pumps. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 2019, 47, 1247–1257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Sim, S.I.; Park, E. P5-ATPases: Structure, substrate specificities, and transport mechanisms. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 2023, 79, 102531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Aguilar-Martínez, J.A.; Sinha, N. Analysis of the role of Arabidopsis class I TCP genes AtTCP7, AtTCP8, AtTCP22, and AtTCP23 in leaf development. Front. Plant Sci. 2013, 4, 406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Ferrero, L.V.; Gastaldi, V.; Ariel, F.D.; Viola, I.L.; Gonzalez, D.H. Class I TCP proteins TCP14 and TCP15 are required for elongation and gene expression responses to auxin. Plant Mol. Biol. 2021, 105, 147–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. Cubas, P.; Lauter, N.; Doebley, J.; Coen, E. The TCP domain: A motif found in proteins regulating plant growth and development. Plant J. 1999, 18, 215–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Alem, A.L.; Ariel, F.D.; Cho, Y.; Hong, J.C.; Gonzalez, D.H.; Viola, I.L. TCP15 interacts with GOLDEN2-LIKE1 to control cotyledon opening in Arabidopsis. Plant J. 2022, 110, 748–763. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Reeves, W.M.; Lynch, T.J.; Mobin, R.; Finkelstein, R.R. Direct targets of the transcription factors ABA-Insensitive(ABI)4 and ABI5 reveal synergistic action by ABI4 and several bZIP ABA response factors. Plant Mol. Biol. 2011, 75, 347–363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Feng, C.; Chen, Y.; Wang, C.; Kong, Y.; Wu, W.; Chen, Y. Arabidopsis RAV1 transcription factor, phosphorylated by SnRK2 kinases, regulates the expression of ABI3, ABI4, and ABI5 during seed germination and early seed development. Plant J. 2014, 80, 654–668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Li, X.; Zhong, M.; Qu, L.; Yang, J.; Liu, X.; Zhao, Q.; Liu, X.; Zhao, X. AtMYB32 regulates the ABA response by targeting ABI3, ABI4 and ABI5 and the drought response by targeting CBF4 in Arabidopsis. Plant Sci. 2021, 310, 110983. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Skubacz, A.; Daszkowska-Golec, A.; Szarejko, I. The role and regulation of ABI5 (ABA-insensitive 5) in plant development, abiotic stress responses and phytohormone crosstalk. Front. Plant Sci. 2016, 7, 1884. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Hu, Y.; Han, X.; Yang, M.; Zhang, M.; Pan, J.; Yu, D. The transcription factor INDUCER OF CBF EXPRESSION1 interacts with ABSCISIC ACID INSENSITIVE5 and DELLA proteins to fine-tune abscisic acid signaling during seed germination in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 2019, 31, 1520–1538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Zhao, H.; Nie, K.; Zhou, H.; Yan, X.; Zhan, Q.; Zheng, Y.; Song, C. ABI5 modulates seed germination via feedback regulation of the expression of the PYR/PYL/RCAR ABA receptor genes. New Phytol. 2020, 228, 596–608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Wei, J.; Li, X.; Song, P.; Wang, Y.; Ma, J. Studies on the interactions of AFPs and bZIP transcription factor ABI5. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2022, 590, 75–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Shu, K.; Chen, Q.; Wu, Y.; Liu, R.; Zhang, H.; Wang, P.; Li, Y.; Wang, S.; Tang, S.; Liu, C.; et al. ABI4 mediates antagonistic effects of abscisic acid and gibberellins at transcript and protein levels. Plant J. 2016, 85, 348–361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Maymon, T.; Eisner, N.; Bar-Zvi, D. The ABCISIC ACID INSENSITIVE (ABI) 4 transcription factor is stabilized by stress, ABA and phosphorylation. Plants 2022, 11, 2179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Gregorio, J.; Hernández-Bernal, A.F.; Cordoba, E.; León, P. Characterization of evolutionarily conserved motifs involved in activity and regulation of the ABA-INSENSITIVE (ABI) 4 transcription factor. Mol. Plant 2014, 7, 422–436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Shu, K.; Zhang, H.; Wang, S.; Chen, M.; Wu, Y.; Tang, S.; Liu, C.; Feng, Y.; Cao, X.; Xie, Q. ABI4 regulates primary seed dormancy by regulating the biogenesis of abscisic acid and gibberellins in Arabidopsis. PLoS Genet. 2013, 9, e1003577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Tian, R.; Wang, F.; Zheng, Q.; Niza, V.M.A.G.E.; Downie, A.B.; Perry, S.E. Direct and indirect targets of the Arabidopsis seed transcription factor ABSCISIC ACID INSENSITIVE3. Plant J. 2020, 103, 1679–1694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Yang, Z.; Liu, X.; Wang, K.; Li, Z.; Jia, Q.; Zhao, C.; Zhang, M. ABA-INSENSITIVE 3 with or without FUSCA3 highly up-regulates lipid droplet proteins and activates oil accumulation. J. Exp. Bot. 2022, 73, 2077–2092. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Parcy, F.; Valon, C.; Kohara, A.; Misera, S.; Giraudat, J. The ABSCISIC ACID-INSENSITIVE3, FUSCA3, AND LEAFY COTYLEDON1 loci act in concert to control multiple aspects of Arabidopsis seed development. Plant Cell 1997, 9, 1265–1277. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  95. Dietz, K.-J. Peroxiredoxins in plants and cyanobacteria. Antioxid. Redox Signal. 2011, 15, 1129–1159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Chen, H.; Chu, P.; Zhou, Y.; Ding, Y.; Li, Y.; Liu, J.; Jiang, L.; Huang, S. Ectopic expression of NnPER1, a Nelumbo nucifera 1-cysteine peroxiredoxin antioxidant, enhances seed longevity and stress tolerance in Arabidopsis. Plant J. 2016, 88, 608–619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  97. Chen, H.; Ruan, J.; Chu, P.; Fu, W.; Liang, Z.; Li, Y.; Tong, J.; Xiao, L.; Liu, J.; Li, C.; et al. AtPER1 enhances primary seed dormancy and reduces seed germination by suppressing the ABA catabolism and GA biosynthesis in Arabidopsis seeds. Plant J. 2020, 101, 310–323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Haslekås, C.; Viken, M.K.; Grini, P.E.; Nygaard, V.; Nordgard, S.H.; Meza, T.J.; Aalen, R.B. Seed 1-cysteine peroxiredoxin antioxidants are not involved in dormancy, but contribute to inhibition of germination during stress. Plant Physiol. 2003, 133, 1148–1157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Abdul Aziz, M.; Sabeem, M.; Mullath, S.K.; Brini, F.; Masmoudi, K. Plant group II LEA proteins: Intrinsically disordered structure for multiple functions in response to environmental stresses. Biomolecules 2021, 11, 1662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Jia, F.; Qi, S.; Li, H.; Liu, P.; Li, P.; Wu, C.; Zheng, C.; Huang, J. Overexpression of Late Embryogenesis Abundant 14 enhances Arabidopsis salt stress tolerance. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2014, 454, 505–511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Weng, J.-K.; Ye, M.; Li, B.; Noel, J.P. Co-evolution of hormone metabolism and signaling networks expands plant adaptive plasticity. Cell 2016, 166, 881–893. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Song, L.; Huang, S.C.; Wise, A.; Castanon, R.; Nery, J.R.; Chen, H.; Watanabe, M.; Thomas, J.; Bar-Joseph, Z.; Ecker, J.R. A transcription factor hierarchy defines an environmental stress response network. Science 2016, 354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  103. O’Malley, R.C.; Huang, S.C.; Song, L.; Lewsey, M.G.; Bartlett, A.; Nery, J.R.; Galli, M.; Gallavotti, A.; Ecker, J.R. Cistrome and Epicistrome Features Shape the Regulatory DNA Landscape. Cell 2016, 165, 1280–1292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  104. Merelo, P.; Xie, Y.; Brand, L.; Ott, F.; Weigel, D.; Bowman, J.L.; Heisler, M.G.; Wenkel, S. Genome-Wide Identification of KANADI1 Target Genes. PLoS One 2013, 8, e77341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Serrano-Mislata, A.; Bencivenga, S.; Bush, M.; Schiessl, K.; Boden, S.; Sablowski, R. DELLA genes restrict inflorescence meristem function independently of plant height. Nat. Plants 2017, 3, 749–754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Images of P. sativum seeds: (a) before radicle protrusion, (b) after radicle protrusion. Embryo includes cotyledons (Cot), first true leaves (Lf), epicotyl (Ep), hypocotyl (Hy), and root (R). Embryonic axis includes Lf, Ep, Hy, and R.
Figure 1. Images of P. sativum seeds: (a) before radicle protrusion, (b) after radicle protrusion. Embryo includes cotyledons (Cot), first true leaves (Lf), epicotyl (Ep), hypocotyl (Hy), and root (R). Embryonic axis includes Lf, Ep, Hy, and R.
Plants 13 00206 g001
Figure 2. The contents of abscisic acid (ABA), phaseic acid (PA), dihydrophaseic acid (DPA), and neo-phaseic acid (neoPA) observed in the embryonic axis of P. sativum before and after radicle protrusion (RP). The data represent the mean ± standard error of 9 biological replicates. The statistical analysis relied on two-tailed t-test with a critical alpha value of 0.05. Significant differences between the mean values are indicated (*** p ≤ 0.001, ** p ≤ 0.005).
Figure 2. The contents of abscisic acid (ABA), phaseic acid (PA), dihydrophaseic acid (DPA), and neo-phaseic acid (neoPA) observed in the embryonic axis of P. sativum before and after radicle protrusion (RP). The data represent the mean ± standard error of 9 biological replicates. The statistical analysis relied on two-tailed t-test with a critical alpha value of 0.05. Significant differences between the mean values are indicated (*** p ≤ 0.001, ** p ≤ 0.005).
Plants 13 00206 g002
Figure 3. Volcano plot representing 70 differentially expressed genes (DEGs). The X-axis indicates the log2-transformed gene expression fold changes in the seed axis before and after radicle protrusion. The Y-axis indicates the log10-transformed p-values. Significant DEGs with lower expression are highlighted in blue (№ 1–24). Significant DEGs with higher expression are highlighted in red (№ 25–70). See Table S1 for the full description of the downregulated and upregulated genes.
Figure 3. Volcano plot representing 70 differentially expressed genes (DEGs). The X-axis indicates the log2-transformed gene expression fold changes in the seed axis before and after radicle protrusion. The Y-axis indicates the log10-transformed p-values. Significant DEGs with lower expression are highlighted in blue (№ 1–24). Significant DEGs with higher expression are highlighted in red (№ 25–70). See Table S1 for the full description of the downregulated and upregulated genes.
Plants 13 00206 g003
Figure 4. Methylation of ABA-related gene promoters in the embryonic axis of germinated P. sativum seeds before and after radicle protrusion (RP). (a) The PsABI3 gene promoter before RP. (b) The PsABI3 gene promoter after RP. (c) The PsABI4 gene promoter before RP. (d) The PsABI4 gene promoter after RP. (e) The PsABI5 gene promoter before RP. (f) The PsABI5 gene promoter after RP. The length of the analyzed segment of the PsABI3 promoter is 1057 bp and the number of cytosines is 160; for the PsABI4 promoter, the length is 721 bp with 181 cytosines; and for the PsABI5 promoter, the length is 1231 bp with 142 cytosines. Circles represent cytosines, with methylated bases shown in black and unmethylated bases in white. See Figures S3–S5 for mapping of PsABI3, PsABI4, and PsABI5, accordingly.
Figure 4. Methylation of ABA-related gene promoters in the embryonic axis of germinated P. sativum seeds before and after radicle protrusion (RP). (a) The PsABI3 gene promoter before RP. (b) The PsABI3 gene promoter after RP. (c) The PsABI4 gene promoter before RP. (d) The PsABI4 gene promoter after RP. (e) The PsABI5 gene promoter before RP. (f) The PsABI5 gene promoter after RP. The length of the analyzed segment of the PsABI3 promoter is 1057 bp and the number of cytosines is 160; for the PsABI4 promoter, the length is 721 bp with 181 cytosines; and for the PsABI5 promoter, the length is 1231 bp with 142 cytosines. Circles represent cytosines, with methylated bases shown in black and unmethylated bases in white. See Figures S3–S5 for mapping of PsABI3, PsABI4, and PsABI5, accordingly.
Plants 13 00206 g004
Figure 5. Oxidative pathways of ABA catabolism: CYP707s—cytochrome P450 monooxygenases; PA—phaseic acid; neoPA—neophaseic acid; DPA—dihydrophaseic acid; neoDPA—epi-neodihydrophaseic acid; PAR—PA reductase.
Figure 5. Oxidative pathways of ABA catabolism: CYP707s—cytochrome P450 monooxygenases; PA—phaseic acid; neoPA—neophaseic acid; DPA—dihydrophaseic acid; neoDPA—epi-neodihydrophaseic acid; PAR—PA reductase.
Plants 13 00206 g005
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Smolikova, G.; Krylova, E.; Petřík, I.; Vilis, P.; Vikhorev, A.; Strygina, K.; Strnad, M.; Frolov, A.; Khlestkina, E.; Medvedev, S. Involvement of Abscisic Acid in Transition of Pea (Pisum sativum L.) Seeds from Germination to Post-Germination Stages. Plants 2024, 13, 206. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants13020206

AMA Style

Smolikova G, Krylova E, Petřík I, Vilis P, Vikhorev A, Strygina K, Strnad M, Frolov A, Khlestkina E, Medvedev S. Involvement of Abscisic Acid in Transition of Pea (Pisum sativum L.) Seeds from Germination to Post-Germination Stages. Plants. 2024; 13(2):206. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants13020206

Chicago/Turabian Style

Smolikova, Galina, Ekaterina Krylova, Ivan Petřík, Polina Vilis, Aleksander Vikhorev, Ksenia Strygina, Miroslav Strnad, Andrej Frolov, Elena Khlestkina, and Sergei Medvedev. 2024. "Involvement of Abscisic Acid in Transition of Pea (Pisum sativum L.) Seeds from Germination to Post-Germination Stages" Plants 13, no. 2: 206. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants13020206

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop