Next Article in Journal
Clubroot-Induced Changes in the Root and Rhizosphere Microbiome of Susceptible and Resistant Canola
Previous Article in Journal
Transcriptomics Identifies Differentially Expressed Genes Inducing Tuber Formation in Early- and Late-Maturing Potatoes
Previous Article in Special Issue
Effects of Auxin (Indole-3-butyric Acid) on Adventitious Root Formation in Peach-Based Prunus Rootstocks
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Correction

Correction: Hale et al. Differential Expression Profiling Reveals Stress-Induced Cell Fate Divergence in Soybean Microspores. Plants 2020, 9, 1510

1
College of Science and Mathematics, Arkansas State University, Jonesboro, AR 72467-1080, USA
2
Arkansas Biosciences Institute, Arkansas State University, Jonesboro, AR 72467-0639, USA
3
College of Agriculture, Arkansas State University, Jonesboro, AR 72467-1080, USA
4
Agricultural Experiment Station, University of Arkansas System Division of Agriculture, Jonesboro, AR 72467-2340, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Plants 2024, 13(13), 1881; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants13131881
Submission received: 13 June 2024 / Accepted: 19 June 2024 / Published: 8 July 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Plant Regeneration)
In the original publication [1], there was a mistake in Figure 1 as published. Panels d and e were not soybean, but rather a second plant species that was being studied simultaneously. The corrected Figure 1 appears below.
The authors state that the scientific conclusions are unaffected. This correction was approved by the Academic Editor. The original publication has also been updated.

Reference

  1. Hale, B.; Phipps, C.; Rao, N.; Wijeratne, A.; Phillips, G.C. Differential expression profiling reveals stress-induced cell fate divergence in soybean microspores. Plants 2020, 9, 1510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. In vitro development of temperature-stressed soybean microspores. (ac) Microgametogenesis, denoted by cell enlargement and the presence of starch granules; (df) microspore embryogenesis in soybean. (d) Embryogenic microspore with evident cytoskeletal fibers fragmenting the cytoplasm; (e) rapidly dividing pro-embryo; (f) microspore-derived embryo with established polarity; (g,h) pollen mitosis 1 (g) and 2 (h) observed in noninduced microspores; (ik) cytological markers associated with an embryogenic culture. (i) Symmetrical division during pollen mitosis 1 observed via DAPI staining; (j,k) secretion of intrinsic molecules from nonisodiametric cells into the induction medium, forming a matrix. VC = vegetative cell; GC = generative cell; SC = sperm cell; Sym = symmetrical mitotic division; Asym = asymmetrical mitotic division. (ac) bars = 15 μm; (d) 5 μm; (e) 100 μm; (f) 1 mm; (g,h) 10 μm; (i,j) 15 μm; (k) 100 μm.
Figure 1. In vitro development of temperature-stressed soybean microspores. (ac) Microgametogenesis, denoted by cell enlargement and the presence of starch granules; (df) microspore embryogenesis in soybean. (d) Embryogenic microspore with evident cytoskeletal fibers fragmenting the cytoplasm; (e) rapidly dividing pro-embryo; (f) microspore-derived embryo with established polarity; (g,h) pollen mitosis 1 (g) and 2 (h) observed in noninduced microspores; (ik) cytological markers associated with an embryogenic culture. (i) Symmetrical division during pollen mitosis 1 observed via DAPI staining; (j,k) secretion of intrinsic molecules from nonisodiametric cells into the induction medium, forming a matrix. VC = vegetative cell; GC = generative cell; SC = sperm cell; Sym = symmetrical mitotic division; Asym = asymmetrical mitotic division. (ac) bars = 15 μm; (d) 5 μm; (e) 100 μm; (f) 1 mm; (g,h) 10 μm; (i,j) 15 μm; (k) 100 μm.
Plants 13 01881 g001
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Hale, B.; Phipps, C.; Rao, N.; Wijeratne, A.; Phillips, G.C. Correction: Hale et al. Differential Expression Profiling Reveals Stress-Induced Cell Fate Divergence in Soybean Microspores. Plants 2020, 9, 1510. Plants 2024, 13, 1881. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants13131881

AMA Style

Hale B, Phipps C, Rao N, Wijeratne A, Phillips GC. Correction: Hale et al. Differential Expression Profiling Reveals Stress-Induced Cell Fate Divergence in Soybean Microspores. Plants 2020, 9, 1510. Plants. 2024; 13(13):1881. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants13131881

Chicago/Turabian Style

Hale, Brett, Callie Phipps, Naina Rao, Asela Wijeratne, and Gregory C. Phillips. 2024. "Correction: Hale et al. Differential Expression Profiling Reveals Stress-Induced Cell Fate Divergence in Soybean Microspores. Plants 2020, 9, 1510" Plants 13, no. 13: 1881. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants13131881

APA Style

Hale, B., Phipps, C., Rao, N., Wijeratne, A., & Phillips, G. C. (2024). Correction: Hale et al. Differential Expression Profiling Reveals Stress-Induced Cell Fate Divergence in Soybean Microspores. Plants 2020, 9, 1510. Plants, 13(13), 1881. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants13131881

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop