Next Article in Journal
MaMYBR30, a Novel 1R-MYB, Plays Important Roles in Plant Development and Abiotic Stress Resistance
Next Article in Special Issue
Urban Air Pollution and Plant Tolerance: Omics Responses to Ozone, Nitrogen Oxides, and Particulate Matter
Previous Article in Journal
Increasing Cyetpyrafen Spray Volume and Ozone Spray Improves the Control Effects against Two-Spotted Spider Mite (Tetranychus urticae) in Strawberries
Previous Article in Special Issue
‘Organ’ising Floral Organ Development
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

When Size Matters: New Insights on How Seed Size Can Contribute to the Early Stages of Plant Development

1
Department of Science and Technology for Sustainable Development and One Health, Università Campus Bio-Medico di Roma, via Álvaro del Portillo, 21, 00128 Rome, Italy
2
Department of Biology and Biotechnology “Charles Darwin”, Sapienza University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Plants 2024, 13(13), 1793; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants13131793
Submission received: 11 June 2024 / Revised: 26 June 2024 / Accepted: 27 June 2024 / Published: 28 June 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue The Molecular Basis of Plant Developmental Diversity)

Abstract

:
The seed habit is the most complex and successful method of sexual reproduction in vascular plants. It represents a remarkable moment in the evolution of plants that afterward spread on land. In particular, seed size had a pivotal role in evolutionary success and agronomic traits, especially in the field of crop domestication. Given that crop seeds constitute one of the primary products for consumption, it follows that seed size represents a fundamental determinant of crop yield. This adaptative feature is strictly controlled by genetic traits from both maternal and zygotic tissues, although seed development and growth are also affected by environmental cues. Despite being a highly exploited topic for both basic and applied research, there are still many issues to be elucidated for developmental biology as well as for agronomic science. This review addresses a number of open questions related to cues that influence seed growth and size and how they influence seed germination. Moreover, new insights on the genetic–molecular control of this adaptive trait are presented.

1. Introduction

The remarkable significance of seeds was first emphasized by Darwin, who used seeds as an example to explain three concepts of the theory he was developing: competition, adaptation, and natural selection [1].
The evolution of seeds in the late Devonian gave rise to a widespread diffusion of plants on earth, as reproduction became water-independent due to the development of the pollination process. The following establishment of angiosperms, with respect to the gymnosperms, was due to the double fertilization-based reproduction mechanism, which gave rise to three distinct tissues in the seed: the maternal seed coat (testa), the triploid endosperm, and the diploid embryo [2,3,4,5]. The latter gives rise to seedlings and will be fed with nutrients by the endosperm until germination. As for the seed coat, which arises from the sporophytic integuments, as well as protecting the embryo, it plays a key role in determining the seed size [6].
Seed size is a complex quantitative and multigenic trait that is strictly regulated; given the diverse origin of seed tissues, there is both a maternal and zygotic control of this character, as well as a crosstalk between these molecular networks, allowing fine-tuning control of this developmental process [7,8,9]. Although this trait is genetically determined and, as such, conserved within a species [10], it is influenced by environmental conditions, such as temperature, day length, and light.
The maternal integuments delimit the cavity where both the embryo and the endosperm will develop, thus playing a key role in defining the final dimension of the seed [11,12,13]. The maternal control of seed size relies on several mechanisms, such as the ubiquitin-proteasome and the G-protein pathways [13,14,15,16,17,18], as well as the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) signaling [19], phytohormones, and growth factors [20].
In rice, as in Arabidopsis, several major QUANTITATIVE TRAIT LOCI (QTLs) associated with seed size variation have been mapped. Very recently, one of these QTLs for seed size and weight has been identified on chromosome 1 (SSW1, SEED SIZE, and WEIGHT1) [21]. SSW1 encodes an amino acid transporter, AAP8, which has been previously shown to be involved in the source-to-sink partitioning of organic nitrogen [22] and in seed development [23]. SSW1 positively affects seed size, as it alters cell proliferation of the maternal integuments of the ovules and developing seeds [21]. Natural variation in SSW1 results in the dominant SSW1Cvi allele characterized by larger seeds and increased seed yield with respect to the recessive SSW1Ler allele. In addition, the amount of amino acids and storage proteins were higher in the line expressing the SSW1Cvi allele compared to the one bearing the SSW1Ler allele, consistent with the amino acid permease activity of SSW1. Given the increased amino acid transport activity of the SSW1Cvi allele, the nitrogen use efficiency (NUE) also increased under low nitrogen conditions [21], thus defining a link between an environmental situation and an endogenous molecular mechanism.
Among the hormones involved in the control of seed size and yield, gibberellins (GA) have been proposed both as a growth-promoting hormone and for the effects of overexpression of some GA-stimulated Arabidopsis (GASA) genes, namely GASA4 and GASA10, which caused an increase in seed size and weight [24,25]. Furthermore, the DELLA gain-of-function mutants gai1 and rgl2Δ17, which are insensitive to GA [26,27], have been shown to affect seed size and morphology [28,29]. Very recently, it has been demonstrated that DELLA proteins contribute to increased cell numbers in maternal integuments through the induction of the transcription factor AINTEGUMENTA, which promotes cell proliferation in these tissues [30,31].
Organ size is an important trait of plant ecology, and in crops, it is directly related to yield and quality. In particular, presently, seed size plays an important role due to constantly changing climate conditions. In fact, despite breeding efforts, many phases of the crop life cycle remain sensitive to adverse environmental cues, with the final effects of decreasing the size, number, and fertility of seeds, delaying germination, and reducing seed vigor in crops [32]. Therefore, gaining insights into the determinants of this multigenic trait is of concern for both basic and applied research.
The genetic and molecular basis of the control of seed size has been recently reviewed [33] both in monocots and dicots; therefore, in this review, we will address a number of open questions directly or indirectly related to the genetic and molecular control of seed size.
In particular, following an analysis of very recent insights into the molecular mechanisms that control this multigenic character, we will discuss the role of the cell wall as a constraint on seed growth, but also the effect of environmental conditions on seed development and final size. Then, agricultural implications will be considered, as seed size influences seed yield, thus representing a basic adaptive trait for crops. Finally, we will also focus on the interplay between seed size and seed germination, examining if and how the former influences the germination process and affects germination rate and/or timing (Figure 1).

2. Developmental Control of Seed Size

2.1. Maternal and Zygotic Control of Seed Size

Maternal and zygotic tissues cooperate in controlling the growth of the embryo, the endosperm, and the seed coat, thus defining seed size. Given that two recent reviews summarize the genetic and molecular networks underlying the control of seed size [33,34], in this section, some new insights on the best characterized maternal and zygotic regulation pathways, namely the ubiquitin-proteosome and the HAIKU ones, will be discussed (Figure 1).
The ubiquitin-proteasome pathway targets key factors regulating the growth and development of maternal tissues involved in seed formation [9,34]. In Arabidopsis, this pathway influences seed size through the activity of the ubiquitin receptor DA1 [14] and of its closest homolog DA1-related (DAR1). DA1 is a ubiquitin receptor with two Ubiquitin-Interacting Motif (UIM) domains and a C-terminal peptidase activity. The da1-1 allele produces a mutant protein DA1R358K, which negatively affects DA1 and DAR1 and produces larger seeds. The effects of R358K mutation in an invariant amino acid in a conserved region could be explained by interfering with the interaction of DA1 family members with a common target [14]. Furthermore, two RING-type E3 ligases, DA2 and ENHANCER OF DA1 (EOD1)/BIG BROTHER (BB), physically interact with DA1 cooperating on its negative regulation of seed size. Consistently, da2-1 and eod1/bb mutants have larger seeds and organs and synergistically enhance the da1-1 phenotype [13,14,17,35]. Both DA2 and BB/EOD1 are able to monoubiquitinate DA1 [17], and, on the other hand, DA1 is able to cleave BB/EOD1 and DA2, which is likely a feedback regulation of the E3 ubiquitin ligases. Very recently, it has been proved that DA2 is able to auto-ubiquitinylate, and this affects its enzymatic activity towards DA1. Since the growth-inhibiting function of DA2 is dependent on DA1, this suggests a fine-tuning mechanism of the balance between cell proliferation and differentiation to regulate plant organ size [36]. The active DA1 cleaves downstream growth regulators as the Ubiquitin-specific Protease Target (UBP15), known as a growth-promoting factor in seeds. ubp15 mutant was isolated as a suppressor of the da1-1 mutant phenotype, while UBP15 overexpressing plants mimic the seed size phenotype of da1-1 [17].
Recently, new insights on this molecular pathway have been provided. Indeed, it has been established that the membrane receptor-like kinase ERECTA (ER) transmits to DA1 and other downstream effectors the signal about the regulation of seed size, revealing a nearly complete ER-MKK4/5-MPK3/6-DA1-UBP15 signaling pathway promoting the proliferation of outer integuments in developing seeds [37]. Since the Landsberg erecta (Ler) ecotype exhibits smaller seeds than the Columbia (Col-0), the authors investigated whether ER might be responsible for this difference. Evidence from a previous study in rice supports this hypothesis, as inactivation of the rice ER homolog (OsER1) resulted in a higher number and reduced size of grains in the spikelet [38]. Consistently, Ler plants expressing gERCol exhibited increased seed size, and er105 mutant (Col-0) expressing ERpro:ER-4myc transgene reverted their smaller seeds to the WT size. ER controls seed size maternally by regulating cell proliferation, as it does for the growth of other organs [39,40]. Moreover, genetic and molecular data proved that the ER signal is carried by the DA1-UBP15 pathway. Indeed, da1-1 mutation and UBP15-OX restored the reduced size and outer integument cell number of the er105 and er105 erl2-1 mutant seeds, as the ubp15-1 mutation restored the phenotype of the ER-OX seeds [37].
As for many plant growth processes [41,42,43], MKK4/5-MPK3/6 signaling acts downstream ER also for seed size control by phosphorylation and inactivation of DA1. MPK3 and MPK6 directly interact with DA1 in yeast two-hybrid assays, and MPK6 phosphorylates and inactivates DA1. Indeed, both WT and non-phosphorylatable DA1 proteins recovered the phenotype of da1-1 seeds, while the constitutively phosphorylated DA1 only slightly decreased the size and outer integument cell number of da1-1 seeds. Interestingly, in the signaling pathway that regulates seed size, ER does not need its cytoplasmic domains, indicating that ER might function as a co-receptor. Indeed, the expression of gERCol with a truncated cytoplasmic tail in er105 mutant plants resulted in seeds similar to or larger than the WT [37].
The DA1 pathway is conserved among different species. For example, the overexpression of the negative interfering mutant of Arabidopsis DA1 (AtDA1R358K) increased seed size and yield in Brassica napus [44]. Similarly, in maize, the overexpression of mutated ZmDA1 or mutated ZmDAR1 increases kernel yield [45].
The rice homolog of AtER, OsER1, has been linked to grain number and size. It has been demonstrated that OsER1 acts upstream of the OsMKKK10-OsMKK4-OsMPK6 cascade to control the number of spikelets per panicle and that this pathway regulates cytokinin metabolism. Indeed, OsMPK6 interacts with and phosphorylates the zinc finger transcription factor DROUGHT AND SALT TOLERANCE (DST), enhancing its transcriptional activity and, in turn, inducing expression of CYTOKININ OXIDASE 2 (OsCKX2), which results in cytokinin degradation, thus maintaining cytokinin at the level required for spikelet formation [38]. Furthermore, the Oser1 loss-of-function mutant produced shorter but wider grains. Nonetheless, the molecular mechanism responsible for grain shape controlled by OsER1 remains unclear, possibly due to the diverse downstream substrates of OsMPK6. Interestingly, OsDA1, a rice homolog of AtDA1, is a negative regulator of rice grain size and directly interacts with OsUBP15, which, similarly to Arabidopsis, positively regulates grain size [46]. It would be interesting to investigate whether the DA1-UBP15 pathway functions in a similar way in Arabidopsis and rice. Moreover, despite the importance of the DA1-UBP15 pathway in regulating seed size, the upstream elements of this pathway are not yet known.
Endoplasmic reticulum (ER)-associated degradation (ERAD) ubiquitin-proteasome system is required for the degradation of misfolded proteins in the ER [47]; therefore, its E1 ubiquitin-activating enzymes are ER-associated [48]. Recently, it has been shown that SMALL GRAIN 3 (SMG3), which encodes an ERAD-related E2, is involved in grain size and weight in rice (Li et al., 2023). Furthermore, DECREASED GRAIN SIZE 1 (DGS1), previously linked to grain size regulation (Zhu et al., 2021), is an active E3 ubiquitin ligase that interacts with SMG3 in ER. Indeed, overexpression of both SMG3 and DGS1 resulted in longer grains [49]. Interestingly, both the smg3 and dgs1 mutants were less sensitive to brassinosteroid (BR), suggesting that SMG3 and DGS1 are involved in BR signaling. Moreover, DGS1 directly interacts with and ubiquitinates BRASSINOSTEROID INSENSITIVE 1 (BRI1), affecting its accumulation. Consistently, genetic analysis demonstrated that SMG3, DGS1, and BRI1 cooperate in regulating grain size and weight. The proposed working model explained how SMG3 and DGS1 influence grain size, at least in part, by mediating the degradation of misfolded BRI1, which may disturb the formation and/or function of normal BRI1 protein [49].
The ubiquitin (Ub)–26S proteasome system (UPS) consists of the core protease 20S and the 19S regulatory particle (RP). The Arabidopsis RPT2, an RP subunit, is encoded by two homologous genes, AtRPT2a and AtRPT2b. A loss of function of AtRPT2a affected UPS activity, resulting in increased seed size and organs, such as leaves, stems, flowers, and embryos. These size abnormalities have been explained by the increased cell expansion, which compensates for a reduction in cell number [50]. More recently, UPS and autophagy interplay have been shown as essential for proper embryo and seed development, thus through maternal and zygotic tissues, by playing a crucial role in regulating proteome stability [51]. Three proteasome and four autophagy mutants have been analyzed to investigate their role in seed development. These mutants showed different seed size phenotypes: the proteosome (rpn10-1) and autophagy mutants (atg10-1 and atg13a-2 atg13b-2) showed enlarged seed phenotype similar to rpt2a-2, while other UPS (rpn1a-4) and autophagy (atg5-1 and atg7-2) mutants showed smaller, similar or larger variation in seed sizes compared to wildtype, respectively [51].
Moreover, the expression of UPS subunits with the total protein ubiquitylation has been compared, and the activity of critical enzymes involved in autophagy flux has been analyzed in developing seedlings, siliques, and embryos of Arabidopsis thaliana. The UPS activity decreased rapidly during early silique and embryo development, while autophagy flux was more sustained and seemed to play a role in later stages of seed development. Furthermore, the reduction of proteasome subunits during siliques development was less pronounced in autophagy-deficient mutants (atg7-2) or wildtype treated with autophagy inhibitor, supporting the conclusion that proteasomes undergo non-selective autophagy-mediated degradation. Similarly, key autophagy proteins such as ATG5, ATG7, and ATG12 were stabilized upon treatment with the proteasome inhibitor MG132, indicating that these proteins are degraded by the UPS. These findings illustrate the mutual regulation between the UPS and autophagy to maintain proteome homeostasis during critical stages of seed development [51].
Several studies indicate that endosperm development is influenced by the HAIKU (IKU) pathway [9,34]. The HAIKU pathway regulates endosperm proliferation and cellularization in Arabidopsis and, therefore, is a key regulator of seed size in Arabidopsis. This pathway consists of three core genes preferentially expressed in early endosperm: IKU1, encoding a VQ-motif-containing protein; MINISEED3 (MINI3), encoding a WRKY transcription factor; and IKU2 (HAIKU2), encoding a leucine-rich repeat receptor-like kinase [52,53,54]. Pollination of iku mutants with wildtype pollen produced normal-sized seeds, suggesting that IKU1, IKU2, and MINI3 regulate seed growth zygotically. Consistently, mutations in these genes resulted in reduced growth and precocious cellularization of the endosperm, resulting in a smaller seed size phenotype [52,53,54]. The transcriptional activator SHB1 (SHORT HYPOCOTYL UNDER BLUE1) works upstream of MINI3 and IKU2 to promote seed enlargement. Indeed, MINI3, together with SHB1, directly binds MINI3 and IKU2 promoters to promote their expression [55]. Consistently, dominant shb1-D mutant developed larger seeds, and this phenotype is suppressed by IKU2 or MIN3 inactivation [56]. Also, IKU1 interacts with MINI3 to positively regulate MINI3 and IKU2 directly or in a transcriptional complex together with SHB1 [34,53,56]. Abscisic acid (ABA) regulates seed size by negatively controlling the IKU pathway. Indeed, in the ABA-deficient mutant aba2, seed size increased along with the expression of SHB1, MINI3, and IKU2. It has been shown that ABA regulates the IKU pathway by repressing SHB1 expression via the transcription factor ABI5 (ABA INSENSITIVE 5). Consistently, the abi5 mutant shows larger seeds and higher SHB1 transcript levels [57]. Furthermore, it has been reported that BRs also affect seed size through zygotic tissues. Indeed, BR-deficient and BR-insensitive mutants produce small, round seeds, and fertilization of these mutants with wildtype pollen results in normal-sized but round seeds, indicating zygotic control. BR activates the expression of SHB1, IKU1, MINI3, and IKU2 in Arabidopsis endosperm, and the BR-response transcription factor BRASSINAZOLE-RESISTANT1 (BZR1) binds to the promoters of SHB1, MINI3, and IKU2 directly [58].
Downstream, the IKU pathway’s cytokinin signaling acts to control seed growth. In Arabidopsis, inactivation of the cytokinin signaling components, such as the sensor histidine kinases AHKs or the histidine phosphotransferases AHPs, results in an increased seed size [59,60]. Indeed, cytokinin homeostasis can affect seed number and seed size in Arabidopsis and crop plants [38,61,62]. Therefore, cytokinin signaling may contribute to balancing seed size and seed number. Interestingly, CYTOKININ OXIDASE 2 (CKX2) is a direct target of MINI3. Indeed, it has been demonstrated that MINI3 binds to the promoter of CKX2 to regulate its expression, and the seed size phenotype of iku2 can be partially rescued by the ahk2 ahk3 mutant or overexpression of CKX2. Therefore, the IKU pathway acts, at least partially, through cytokinin signaling to regulate seed size [63].
Recently, it has been shown that ectopic overexpression of AtSHB1 results in larger seeds in canola, where AtSHB1 regulates the expression of canola genes which are homologous to Arabidopsis MINI3, IKU2, SHB1, AGAMOUS-LIKE 62 (AGL62), and FERTILIZATION INDEPENDENT ENDOSPERM (FIE). Consistently, SHB1 regulates AGL62 and FIE in Arabidopsis [64]. These findings suggest that SHB1 may regulate different aspects of seed development, including the activity of the Polycomb Repressive Complex 2 responsible for epigenetic control during seed development (FIS-PRC2) [34,64,65].
Interestingly, the evolutionarily conserved role of IKU2 during endosperm proliferation in dicots and monocots has been recently demonstrated [66]. IKU2s was epigenetically repressed by PRC2 in dicot plants, while in monocots, this expression continued during endosperm development due to the lack of H3K27me3 markers on IKU2s gene loci [66]. This ancestral IKU2 function, but divergent epigenetic regulation may reveal the evolutionary route of seed development [66].

2.2. Does Cell Wall Constrain Seed Growth?

Many QTL and genes involved in the control of seed size in Arabidopsis and crops have been identified, but how seed growth is arrested once it has reached a definite size is still an open question. In other organisms, the determination of organ size is thought to be controlled by mechanical and biochemical signals [67,68]. Mechanical signals in plants influence growth by the modulation of auxin distribution [69], cytoskeleton organization [70], chromatin organization [71], and gene expression [72]. The primary cause of mechanical stress in plant cells is turgor pressure, defined as the force exerted by water pushing outward on the plasma membrane and the plant cell wall (CW), which counterbalances it. Differences in solute concentration between the outside of the cell membrane and the cytoplasm generate turgor pressure, which puts CW in tension [73]. Plant cells are interconnected by CWs, consequently the build-up of turgor-driven tensile stresses provide instructive intercellular and intertissue signals influencing morphogenesis. Since cells within tissues are not mechanically isolated, mechanical signals encompass both cell-autonomous and noncell-autonomous contributions [74]. For instance, how organ growth is influenced by pressure from inner tissues has been studied in developing seeds. Seed growth depends on the interplay between the testa and the endosperm [7], both maternal-derived tissues with a pivotal role in the control of seed size. Within the endosperm, the rise in turgor pressure, generated by osmolyte accumulation, is believed to drive seed growth, while its progressive reduction at the end of the growth phase was proposed to contribute to growth arrest [75]. Accordingly, nanoindentation techniques have shown that endosperm pressure follows this trend. Surprisingly, haiku2 mutant fails to decrease endosperm pressure at the end of the growth phase but develops smaller seeds than the WT [76], suggesting that endosperm pressure plays two antagonistic roles: it both drives and inhibits seed growth. This can be explained by the observation that the increase of endosperm pressure exerts tensile stress over the testa, inducing the expression of EUI-LIKE P450 A1 [77], a negative regulator of seed size, which promotes CW stiffening and thus constrain seed growth [78]. Accordingly stiffening was also observed in wheat grain at late developmental stage which may contribute to arrest grain radial growth [79].
Environmental stresses are well known to reduce cell growth in response to CW stiffening [80]. Accordingly, it has been shown that strain stiffening restricts organ bulging and limits growth in tomato shoots [81]. Moreover, growth arrest in coleoptile has been correlated with loss of CW plasticity rather than turgor pressure, which implies an increase in CW stiffness [82]. This evidence highlights the importance of CW mechanical properties during plant development. The CW is composed of cellulose, the major load-bearing component, non-cellulosic polysaccharides (pectin and hemicellulose), and other non-saccharide components [83]. The pectin matrix is believed to play a central role in the determination of cell-wall mechanical properties. Homogalacturonans (HG) is the most abundant pectin. It is synthesized in a methyl-esterified form, and its degree of methyl esterification is controlled by the action of Pectin Methyl Esterases (PMEs) [84]. The degree of methyl esterification influences HG enzymatic degradation, which leads to cell-wall weakening and promotes growth [85]. On the other hand, full de-methyl esterification causes the formation of cross-links, which increase stiffness and restrain growth [86]. Accordingly, it was observed that during the late seed growth phase, pectin de-methyl esterification occurs mostly in the adaxial epidermis of the outer integument, supporting its load-bearing role [76]. The overexpression of inhibitors of PME activity (PMEI5) results in larger and heavier seeds, a phenotype that could be the consequence of an altered level of pectin methyl esterification or reduced seed production in the silique [87]. Conversely, mutation of PMEI6 produces seeds with reduced width and length, leading to smaller seeds [88], without any variation in the production of seeds in the silique. In grasses, pectin is less abundant than in eudicots [89]. Nevertheless, it plays an important role in seed development. Recently, it was shown in barley that the nucellus, the central part of the ovule, displays a different pattern of HG methyl esterification, more de-esterified in the inner nucellar cells than in the outer one [90]. Mutation of both OPM1 and OPM2 (OVULE PECTIN MODIFIER1 and 2), belonging to the PME family, increased barley grain length. Consistently, overexpression of PMEI had a similar effect, thus strengthening the importance of the degree of HG methyl esterification during seed development [90].
Mutation of genes directly involved in CW biosynthesis rather than CW remodeling seems to affect seed growth and development, altering the final size and weight. For instance, mutation of CELLULOSE SYNTHASE 2 and 9 (CESA2 and CESA9), which are involved in cellulose biosynthesis, results in smaller seeds [91,92]. In the case of CESA5, even though the length and area are reduced, the weight [88] does not seem to be affected [92].
The CW, beside polysaccharides, contains different proteins involved in CW assembly and loosening. Among these, EXPANSINs (EXPNs) are CW-loosening proteins [93]. EXPNs induce CW relaxation by cutting the connection between cellulosic and non-cellulosic polysaccharides, thus promoting cell swelling [94,95]. EXPNs have been shown to promote seed growth in Arabidopsis, maize, rice, and wheat [77,96,97,98,99,100]. Since EXPNs promote wall-loosening, which results in the reduction of turgor pressure and cell swelling, it would be interesting to study how EXPNs affect turgor-driven tensile stresses between tissues, in particular between testa and endosperm.
Plant cells constantly oversee CW integrity (CWI) and, in the case of CW malfunctioning, activate compensatory mechanisms aiming to restore CW functionality and prevent cell death [101]. Cells monitor CWI with different mechanisms. They can perceive (i) plasma membrane stretches through Ca2+ and other ion channels, (ii) shrinking or displacement of the plasma membrane through cell-surface sensor kinase, and (iii) cell-wall modification, most likely through receptor kinase belonging to the Catharanthus roseus Receptor-Like Kinases (CrRLK1Ls) family [102]. Mutations in sensors involved in CWI perception affect seed growth. For instance, FERONIA (FER), which is involved in cell elongation [103], is an upstream regulator of RAC/ROPs GTPases, membrane-associated proteins acting as molecular transducers of extracellular signals [104,105]. FER represses cell elongation of integument cells, thus negatively controlling seed growth, through the activation of a signaling pathway with Guanine Exchange Factors 1 (GEF1), which stimulates GDP–GTP exchange and activates RAC/ROPs [106]. Notably, FERONIA-like receptors (FLR) in rice also control grain size, with FLR1, FLR2, and FLR8 acting as negative regulators, while FLR15 is a positive one [107]. Also, the receptor-like kinase FEI2, which is involved in response to CW damage downstream of THESEUS1 (THE1) CrRLK1Ls [108], is likely to be involved in the control of grain size, although it plays a positive function, promoting seed growth [88]. Increasing evidence has shown that mutations or chemical treatments impairing CW deposition activate CWI maintenance mechanisms [101], leading to jasmonic acid (JA) production and lignin deposition in a turgor-dependent manner [108,109,110]. JA is bound by the receptor CORONATINE-INSENSITIVE PROTEIN 1 (COI1) [111] and triggers degradation of the JASMONATE-ZIM DOMAIN (JAZ) repressors, thus relieving the JAZ-mediated repression of the transcription factor targets, such as MYCs [112]. JA has been shown to play a pivotal role in the control of seed size. Indeed, both coi1 and myc2/3/4/5 mutant seeds show increased size and weight [113], while JAZ11 overexpression reduces it [114]. Moreover, also the loss-of-function mutant for JASMONATE RESISTANT 1 (JAR1), which catalyzes the formation of bioactive JA-Ile conjugates, shows increased seed size and weight [113]. Conversely, alteration of JA biosynthesis caused by mutation impairing keto-acyl thiolase 2B (KAT-2B) leads to a reduction in seed size and grain weight [115]. Mutation in KAT-2B also showed a significant increase in ABA and the induction of genes involved in senescence, suggesting that the alteration in grain size and weight observed in this mutant could be caused by multiple effects.
Since CW properties, mechanical signals, and CWI are tightly interconnected to optimize plant growth and development, it would be interesting to assess whether the suppression of CWI maintenance coupled with CW alteration aimed at reducing stiffening of the testa may be an exploitable strategy to further increase seed weight and quality in crops.

3. Seed Size as Determinant of Plant Success

3.1. Is Seed Size Related to Tolerance to Environmental Stresses?

Environmental factors such as high/low temperatures, drought stress, light intensity, and soil salinity due to changes in precipitation can have a dramatic impact on seed sizes and composition, thus affecting plant development and reducing crop yields. Nonetheless, the precise molecular mechanisms underlying these variations are still largely unexplored.
Temperature plays a crucial role in plant growth and development, directly influencing seed quality and crop yield. Both extremely high and low temperatures can have detrimental effects on seeds, eventually impacting agricultural productivity. Indeed, temperature fluctuations during seed formation and maturation stages significantly affect seed features and size, often leading to reduced viability and vigor [116]. A recent study highlighted how soybean seeds suffering from high night temperatures during the filling stage are characterized by reduced yield and altered seed size and composition. Three cultivars, ZH39 (high-protein variety), Z1307 (medium-protein variety), and ZH76 (low-protein variety), have been subjected to a 28 °C high night temperature treatment for two years. The treatment had a detrimental effect on seed size in all varieties, as the length, width, and diameter of seeds showed a significant decrease. Along with the seed size, the protein, residue, and oil contents were also affected by the treatment. A transcriptomic analysis carried out on samples of treated soybean leaves revealed that the seed size and quality phenotype following heat treatment was due, as previously suggested, to the down-regulation of both genes involved in regulating pericarp cell-wall expansion [117] and HEAT SHOCK PROTEINS (HSPs) related genes [116,118,119].
The role of HSPs in relation to heat stress and seed size was further investigated in tobacco, where 61 HSP70 members have been identified. HSP70 is a highly conserved HSP, acting as the main molecular chaperone in most plants [120]. Indeed, NtHSP70-8 was found to be highly expressed under drought stress conditions, conferring drought tolerance to tobacco when overexpressed [121]. In the study by Zhang et al., the aim was to identify and characterize tobacco HSP70 genes with high homology to NtHSP70-8, which could play a crucial role in alleviating heat stress. NtHSP70-8b was chosen, and its expression levels under heat, drought, high salt stress, and abscisic acid (ABA) treatment were assessed. ABA is known to play an essential role in heat-stress response [122], as it has been reported that overexpression of the ABA RESPONSE ELEMENT BINDING (AREB) gene enhances high-temperature tolerance [123]. The expression of NtHSP70-8b reached its highest level after 4 h heat and ABA treatment. Interestingly, NtHSP70-8b overexpression significantly increased seed weight and diameter, while knockout lines exhibited the opposite phenotype. In addition, OE lines showed a significant increase in the expression levels of ABA synthesis and response, stress defense, and other HSP genes, resulting in a lower H2O2 and malondialdehyde (MDA) content, while KO lines showed significantly reduced antioxidant capacity compared to the wildtype under heat-stress conditions [124]. These results suggest that NtHSP70-8b has substantial potential for improving tobacco seed yield, as well as tolerance to heat stress.
Among the great number of transcription regulators that plants have evolved to cope with environmental stresses, an interesting example is represented by the TFs belonging to the Alfin-like (AL) family, which are related to seed size and drought stress tolerance in Oryza sativa (rice) [125]. Water availability is a more and more significant threat to rice production since the water required for rice cultivation represents approximately 50% of the water used for agricultural purposes [126]. By association analysis, it was shown that the natural variation of OsALs genes is mainly associated with seed size and drought tolerance. Thus, two loss-of-function mutants were produced, osal7.1 and osal11. Overexpressing and mutant lines for OsAL7.1 and OsAL11 demonstrated that these two proteins negatively regulate both seed size and drought tolerance, although the molecular mechanism of this activity has not yet been unveiled [125].
The GRAIN SIZE AND ABIOTIC STRESS TOLERANCE 1 (GSA1) QTL has been identified for its allelic variation on grain size and tolerance to abiotic stresses [127]. As for grain size, natural variation in GSA1 causes reduced grain weight, width, and length. Based on genetic and molecular analyses, it was proved that GSA1 positively regulates grain size through the control of the ratio between cell proliferation and cell expansion during spikelet development. It has been previously shown that auxin plays a major role in the control of seed size through the activity of a number of auxin regulatory factors, namely BIG GRAIN1 (BG1) and TILLERING AND SMALL GRAIN 1 (TSG1) [128,129]. Consistently, RNA-seq of GSA1 allelic variants revealed that GSA1 indirectly alters auxin levels and auxin-related genes, as well as the auxin transporter PIN1 [127]. Curiously, GSA1 encodes for a UDP-glucosyltransferase (UTG83A1), whose enzymatic activity towards flavonoids and monolignols has been proved in vitro [127]. It is known that flavonoid glycosides accumulate under abiotic stresses to protect plants against oxidative damage [130]. A metabolomic assay on the allelic variants of GSA1 under normal and salt stress conditions revealed that the relative levels of flavonoid glycosides were lower in the more sensitive variants and higher in the more tolerant ones, thus suggesting that GSA1 is crucial for the induction of the phenylpropanoid pathway and the accumulation of flavonoid glycosides and anthocyanins in response to abiotic stress [127].
Photoperiod, as a marker of day length, represents an important environmental cue as it allows plants to undergo developmental and physiological processes during the most favorable period in order to maximize their reproductive success [131]. Plants are classified into long-day (LD), short-day (SD), or day-neutral, depending on their optimal photoperiod for flowering, although photoperiod also influences vegetative development. Recently, it has been shown that growing under the most suitable photoperiodic condition results in bigger and heavier seeds, suggesting that photoperiod-mediated floral transition and seed development may be synergistically controlled by conserved regulatory mechanisms [132].
Given the central role of the regulator CONSTANS (CO) in integrating internal and external signals into the photoperiodic flowering pathway, it was investigated its contribution to the post-flowering reproductive growth in Arabidopsis [132]. Using different transgenic lines, it was possible to observe that overexpressing and mutant lines for CO resulted in larger and smaller seed phenotypes, respectively, under both SD and LD and that the mutant line co-9 was insensitive to day length.
Moreover, using a steroid-inducible version of CO, activation at 6 Days After Pollination (DAP) resulted in significantly larger seeds, while at 8 DAP did not affect seed size, suggesting that CO has a key role in the photo-mediated early stage of seed development, with its expression pattern pointing to an action during early seed coat and/or embryo development. Transcriptomic analysis revealed that CO represses APETALA 2 (AP2) transcription, thus restraining its negative effect on seed size during the early stages of seed development [132]. Therefore, CO promotes seed enlargement in photoperiodic plants under optimal photoperiod conditions, exerting its function by recruiting different co-factors to inversely regulate AP2 expression in a day length-dependent manner. While this model was proved in Arabidopsis and rice, soybean CO homolog only has a light effect on seed size as on the expression of AP2, implying that the mechanism identified may not be evolutionarily conserved [132] (Figure 1).

3.2. Seed Size Is a Quantitative and Qualitative Agronomic Trait for Cereals

The study of how seed size is established is a fascinating question of plant developmental biology; nevertheless, seed size also represents a relevant qualitative and quantitative agronomic trait that has been the target of natural selection and intensive breeding activity. The value of this trait is due to its contribution to seed weight, one of the criteria that determines final yield in many crops, especially for cereals, which are the main source of calories for humans and animals worldwide. On the other hand, for crops such as rice, seed size represents a valuable qualitative trait. In fact, grain shape and size are important characteristics driving consumers’ choices; hence, they determine the success and price of a rice variety on the market. The two main rice subspecies are japonica and indica, which show different seed shapes: indica grains are characterized by a long and thin shape, while japonica seeds are roundish and short, as the result of many years of domestication and natural selection. However, breeders keep working on always finding new varieties with different length/width ratios and, given that Italy is the first producer of rice in Europe, a beautiful example of breeders’ work can be seen in the grain diversity of the Italian rice varieties belonging to the japonica subspecies (Figure 2) [133].
Breeding activity has benefited from Genome-Wide Association Studies (GWAS) and QTL analyses that helped to understand the natural and artificial selection that contributed to seed size, as well as to decipher the molecular mechanisms, providing targetable genes for new breeding. GWAS is a high throughput analysis that allows the matching of specific genomic variations with the agronomic trait of interest. Recently, Chen and co-authors used GWAS to identify the genetic variants that determine the differences between japonica and indica rice [134]. They found that the coding sequence of the GRAIN SHAPE ON CHROMOSOME 9 (GSE9) gene originated de novo in the japonica subspecies from an intergenic region. In fact, the majority of the indica subspecies have an SNP changing A to G at the start code of GSE9, implying that they do not express this gene, while japonica subspecies do. Functional analyses confirmed that the japonica GSE9 gene makes larger seeds because it affects the number and size of the cells of the spikelet hull, regulating cell cycle and expansion. However, the molecular function of GSE9 is still unknown, and hence, further analyses are necessary to discover the molecular mechanism [134].
The most diffuse strategy for the identification of the loci linked to an agronomic trait is still the QTL analysis. It relies on the mapping of genetic markers to identify the genomic locus segregating with a specific quantitative trait. Over the years, many QTLs have been identified for grain size, but only a few of them have been characterized. Hence, here we describe the main QTLs for which extensive functional analyses have been done, while a more extensive list of the QTLs associated with grain size is reported in Table 1 [127,135,136,137,138,139].
The first QTL associated with grain size in the indica subspecies was identified on the centromeric region of chromosome 3, and alone, it explained 20% of the weight variations and 55% of the length variations in grain rice varieties. In 2006, this QTL was identified as GRAIN SIZE 3 (GS3) locus [140], which encodes for a Gγ subunit (Group III) of the heterotrimeric G-proteins, a protein family extensively shown to be regulators of grain size. The two main domains of the GS3 protein are the Gy-like domain at the N-terminal part and the Cys-domain at the C-terminal [147]. The Gy-like domain was already known as the Organ Size Regulator (OSR) because it was recognized to be specific and sufficient for the negative function of GS3 in grain size [15]. In fact, the Gy-like domain participates in the binding of GS3 with Gβ-protein RGB, which, together with other G-proteins, such as DENSE AND ERECT PANICLE 1 (DEP1) and RICE Gα SUBUNIT (RGA), regulate seed size.
A mutation widely present in rice varieties with long grain changes the C to A, inserting a premature stop coding and producing a truncated protein missing most of the Gγ-like domain2 and the Cys-domain [15]. This indicates that the mutation has ancient origins and that GS3 works as a negative regulator of seed size, as also confirmed by several functional analyses. Another interesting mutation of GS3 was found in the Chuan-7 rice variety that lacks only the Cys-domain and determines extra small seeds, suggesting that the Cys-domain is a regulatory region for GS3 function [15,148]. In 2021, Yang and co-authors found that the Cys-domain is essential for the interaction with the RING E3 ligase Chang Li Geng1-1 (CLG1), which brings GS3 to degradation [149]. Moreover, genetic analyses revealed that CLG1 natural variations are associated with different seed lengths, further supporting the importance of the GS3-mediated pathway in the regulation of grain size.
Another well-studied QTL is called GRAIN WIDTH 5 (GW5, also known as qSW5 and GSE5) [150,151]. This QTL is mainly associated with grain width, which seems to depend on the expression levels of the GW5 gene [151,152]: high GW5 expression determines thin grains, while low expression roundish ones. GW5 is used as a marker for distinguishing japonica and indica subspecies, as deletions in the promoter of GW5 are typical of the japonica seeds with a roundish phenotype [141,151,152]. At the molecular level, GW5 encodes for a calmodulin-containing protein localized at the plasma membrane and in the nucleus [142,146], and many pieces of evidence suggest that GW5 controls seed shape, regulating the BR pathway. As well as overall plant growth, BR is also involved in the control of seed size, regulating cell elongation, division, and differentiation [153]. GW5 mediates BR signaling because it interacts with the GLYCOGEN SYNTHASE KINASES (GSK2, the homologous of the Arabidopsis BIN2), inhibiting its activity, which includes the phosphorylation of two transcription factors, namely BZR1 and DWARF AND LOW-TILLERING (DLT) [142]. The GSK2-mediated phosphorylation of BZR1 and DLT determines their degradation and hence restrains BR-mediated gene expression.
Moreover, GW5 interacts with the transcription factor WRKY53 [154] to control the expression of the SGW5 gene, a novel QTL linked with grain width [146]. Given that WRKY53 is a transcription factor involved in BR signaling to regulate seed size in rice [154], this could suggest that GW5 participates in the BR-mediated gene expression regulating different factors. However, how the GW5-mediated BR pathway determines the length/width ratio of the seed is still largely unknown. In particular, it would be interesting to understand the effect of GW5-mediated BR pathway at single-cell resolution, also considering the impact of BR on seed size as described above, and the identification of other QTLs, such as GS10 and GL2, both linking seed size with the BR pathway [144,145,155].
A deep functional characterization has been carried out for the GRAIN WIDTH AND WEIGHT 2 (GW2) QTL, which encodes for an E3 ligase protein and is homologous to the already mentioned Arabidopsis DA2 protein [13]. GW2 was found in a QTLs mapping from the cross between the japonica variety WY3, with large grain, and the indica one FAZ1, with small seeds. The analysis revealed that the GW2 allele of the WY3 rice is truncated, while the one from FAZ1 rice encodes the full-length protein that negatively regulates seed width [143]. The size-related phenotype is likely to be due to the cell number of the spikelet hulls, suggesting that GW2 inhibits cell division, an observation also confirmed by a new GW2 allele called gw2.1 [156]. However, the molecular mechanism underlying GW2-mediated cell proliferation is not fully elucidated yet, although, given the nature of the protein, finding its target of degradation could be the goal. In fact, E3 ligase activity provides specificity for proteasome degradation, recognizing and ubiquitinating only specific targets, but finding the E3 ligase-target match can be very challenging due to the transient nature of the binding. So far, only two targets have been identified for GW2: EXPLA1, an expansive, driving cell-wall loosening [157], and WG1, a CC-type glutaredoxin protein that positively regulated cell proliferation [158].
Moreover, the size-related phenotype, GW2, has also been characterized for the effect on endosperm expansion, which is an indirect effect of the spikelet hull size. Endosperm is a critical tissue for grain quality because it accumulates starch, proteins, and lipids as reserve molecules in a process called grain filling [159]. Given the importance of rice as a nutritional food, it is easy to imagine why finding QTL involved in grain filling is an attractive objective, and GW2 has become the focus of many research lines. In 2021, it was shown that the knockout of GW2 by CRISPR-Cas9 positively affects grain protein and minerals contents [160], further supporting the idea that GW2 represents a key locus for enhancing rice quality.
As already mentioned, seeds represent the key element for plant fitness, and many aspects of seed biology need to be considered when agronomic selections are applied. Understanding how seed morphology is linked, for example, to seed vigor, meant as seed longevity and germination, is a fascinating issue that will be discussed in the next paragraph.

3.3. Does Seed Size Influence the Success of Seed Germination?

The germination process starts with water uptake and ends with the protrusion of the radicle. Successful seed germination is important for initiating the next phase of the plant life cycle, ensuring vigorous and healthy seedling growth, and ultimately resulting in high crop yields [161]. Additionally, seed size and weight are important agronomic traits influencing plant fitness, environmental stress adaptation, yield, and quality [162,163,164]. In barley, ABA inhibits GA-mediated α-amylase expression to control dormancy and germination [165]. Similarly, the study by Asatsuma et al. [166] found that rice lines with suppressed expression of α-amylase I-1 at both the mRNA and protein levels exhibited significantly delayed seed germination and seedling growth [166]. Seed development is a complex process, finely regulated by numerous genes that respond to developmental and environmental signals, including ABA, which regulates different processes in plants, such as seed germination, dormancy, fruit development, and stress adaptation [9,167,168]. Variations in ABA levels are mainly controlled by de novo biosynthesis, hydroxylation, and conjugation. Notably, the hydrolysis of ABA-glucose ester mediated by β-glucosidase, which releases active ABA, is considered faster than the de novo biosynthesis pathway and plays a key role in regulating endogenous ABA content in response to abiotic stresses, thus influencing seed physiology [169].
In a recent study by Wang et al., the Citrullus lanatus β-glucosidases 1 (ClBG1) gene, which encodes a β-glucosidase involved in ABA modulation, was found to be highly expressed during the ripening of cultivated watermelon but at low levels in non-ripening wild watermelon, suggesting its involvement in ABA-mediated fruit ripening. To further investigate the function of ClBG1 in watermelon, the CRISPR/Cas9 system was used to introduce mutations in the ClBG1 gene in the cultivated watermelon variety ZXJM. This study found that dysfunction of ClBG1 led to decreased seed size and weight. Notably, ClBG1, located on chromosome 8, is physically near the seed size QTL ClSS8.2 [170,171]. This finding confirms that ClBG1 may play a role in watermelon seed size control. Additionally, the shape and size of plant organs are controlled by programmed cell division and cell expansion. Specifically, the spatiotemporal patterns of cell division and cell enlargement are mainly regulated by the reorientation of microtubule arrays. In this study, the GO term enrichment analysis of the DEGs revealed that microtubule-, tubulin-, and cell cycle-related genes were strongly affected by mutation in the Clbg1 gene, which was consistent with the alteration of cell number and size. Although cell size was significantly increased, seed size and weight decreased in the Clbg1-mutant lines, indicating that cell number is the most important factor in seed size determination [172]. In recent years, there has been substantial progress in identifying important genes that regulate grain number and weight, significantly advancing the genetic improvement of rice yield [173]. To date, over 80 genes related to rice grain size have been identified and linked to various regulatory pathways. As already mentioned, a significant pathway is the G-protein signaling pathway, which includes the Heterotrimeric G-protein α subunit (RGA1) [15,174]. The RGA1 gene plays a crucial role in controlling several seed traits in rice, including grain size and seed germination, primarily through modulating ABA content [175]. The mutation in SMALL AND ROUND GRAIN 5 (SRG5) gene in rice is associated with increased ABA levels, which correlate with delayed seed germination. RT-qPCR analysis indicated a significant decrease in ABA biosynthesis and catabolism gene expression in the srg5 mutant, with biosynthetic genes at about 70% and catabolic genes at 40% of wildtype levels. This was further demonstrated by a 20% increase in ABA levels in the srg5 mutant in germinating seeds compared to wildtype. To identify the target gene of SRG5, BSA, and genetic linkage analysis pinpointed the Alpha-subunit of GTP-binding protein Os05g0333200, which encodes RGA1, as the gene responsible for the small-grain phenotype in the srg5 mutant. A G to A mutation in the first intron of RGA1 disrupted normal splicing, leading to a premature stop codon and a truncated protein [175]. This mutation in RGA1 resulted in small grain size and reduced plant height, confirming it as the target gene affected by the srg5 mutation. Thus, the effect of RGA1 extends beyond seed size to include significant impacts on seed germination, mediated through regulating ABA catabolism [175].
Seed germination and post-germination seedling performance are often affected by environmental factors and inherent seed traits. Likewise, seed size (mass) is an important evolutionary trait that affects seed germination and seedling performance [176,177,178,179]. In phenotypic analysis concerning seed size and germination, it is evident that seed size plays a key role in germination outcomes under varied environmental conditions. Larger seeds have greater resources for seedling metabolism to utilize during germination and an increased ability to stress tolerance, enabling greater seedling survival and growth [180]. In Brassica tournefortii and Lotus garcinii, larger seeds exhibited a notably higher germination percentage compared to smaller seeds under controlled temperature. Specifically, larger seeds demonstrated enhanced germination under a 12-h light cycle at 25/35 °C and 15/25 °C, respectively. The low germination percentage for small seeds of B. tournefortii and L. garcinii compared with the large seeds may be attributed to different levels of seed dormancy within a seed lot, as all of the ungerminated seeds were healthy and hence considered viable, which indicates that smaller seeds have a deeper degree of dormancy than larger seeds [181]. Another study on Dennettia tripetala investigated the effects of seed size on germination and early seedling growth by categorizing seeds into small, medium, and large sizes. The experiment used a Completely Randomized Design and assessed variables such as seedling height, collar diameter, leaf number, and biomass. The results demonstrated that larger seeds exhibited a slightly delayed germination but improved overall growth characteristics compared to smaller seeds. Indeed, larger seeds showed advantages in seedling height, collar diameter, and biomass, suggesting a larger number of nutrient reserves promoting early growth. Conversely, smaller seeds germinated slightly earlier but displayed lower growth features. These findings contribute to a better understanding of the physiological impacts of seed size on plant development, providing valuable insights for agricultural practices, especially in optimizing the cultivation and regeneration of this species [182].
In natural variation studies, it is evident that larger seeds generally yield better germination and early growth. However, these studies primarily document phenotypic observations and do not explore the underlying genetic pathways that lead to these differences [181,182,183]. This is in contrast to the detailed genetic insights provided by CRISPR-based research, such as the studies on watermelon and rice, where specific genes like ClBG1 and RGA1 were targeted, demonstrating how genetic modifications can directly impact seed size and germination processes [172,175]. It is important to understand the complex genetic networks that influence seed size and yield, highlighting how both genetic mechanisms and environmental factors shape these traits [184].
To effectively bridge the gap between the observed phenotypic variations in naturally occurring seed sizes and the precise genetic variations achieved through CRISPR, future research should focus on applying genomic and molecular biology tools to explore the genetic foundations of naturally varying seed sizes.

Author Contributions

Writing—original draft preparation, review, and editing, A.B., S.C., H.K., A.L., C.L., R.L. and P.V.; figures—conception and achievement, A.B., S.C., H.K., A.L., C.L. and R.L. All authors reviewed, edited and discussed this review. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was partially funded by the European Union Next-GenerationEU (PIANO NAZIONALE DI RIPRESA E RESILIENZA (PNRR)–MISSIONE 4 COMPONENTE 2, INVESTIMENTO 1.4–D.D. 1032 17/06/2022), grant number: CN00000022-National Research Centre for Agricultural Technologies (Agritech) (S.C.), and by the European Union Next-GenerationEU (PRIN2022 20228Z8TXN) (P.V.) R.L. is supported by the Italian Ministry of University and Research (MUR) (project 630 “Development of bio-based solutions for the valorization of waste agri-food biomass”, D.M. 631 n. 1062—10.08.2021 PON “Ricerca e Innovazione” 2014–2020, Asse IV “Istruzione e 632 ricerca per il recupero”–Azione IV.4–“Dottorati e contratti di ricerca su tematiche 633 dell’innovazione” e Azione IV.6–“Contratti di ricerca su tematiche Green”).

Acknowledgments

We thank the following companies Bertone Sementi S.p.a, Lugano Leonardo, and Unagarlanda, for providing the rice grains shown in Figure 2.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Black, M. Darwin and Seeds. Seed Sci. Res. 2009, 19, 193–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Friedman, W.E. Developmental and Evolutionary Hypotheses for the Origin of Double Fertilization and Endosperm. C. R. Acad. Sci. III 2001, 324, 559–567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Haughn, G.; Chaudhury, A. Genetic Analysis of Seed Coat Development in Arabidopsis. Trends Plant Sci. 2005, 10, 472–477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Lafon-Placette, C.; Köhler, C. Embryo and Endosperm, Partners in Seed Development. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2014, 17, 64–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Beeckman, T.; De Rycke, R.; Viane, R.; Inzé, D. Histological Study of Seed Coat Development in Arabidopsis Thaliana. J. Plant Res. 2000, 113, 139–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Chaudhury, A.M.; Koltunow, A.; Payne, T.; Luo, M.; Tucker, M.R.; Dennis, E.S.; Peacock, W.J. Control of Early Seed Development. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 2001, 17, 677–699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Garcia, D.; Fitz Gerald, J.N.; Berger, F. Maternal Control of Integument Cell Elongation and Zygotic Control of Endosperm Growth Are Coordinated to Determine Seed Size in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 2005, 17, 52–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Sundaresan, V. Control of Seed Size in Plants. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2005, 102, 17887–17888. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Li, N.; Xu, R.; Li, Y. Molecular Networks of Seed Size Control in Plants. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2019, 70, 435–463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Tsukaya, H. Mechanism of Leaf-Shape Determination. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2006, 57, 477–496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Adamski, N.M.; Anastasiou, E.; Eriksson, S.; O’Neill, C.M.; Lenhard, M. Local Maternal Control of Seed Size by KLUH/CYP78A5-Dependent Growth Signaling. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2009, 106, 20115–20120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Fang, W.; Wang, Z.; Cui, R.; Li, J.; Li, Y. Maternal Control of Seed Size by EOD3/CYP78A6 in Arabidopsis Thaliana. Plant J. 2012, 70, 929–939. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Xia, T.; Li, N.; Dumenil, J.; Li, J.; Kamenski, A.; Bevan, M.W.; Gao, F.; Li, Y. The Ubiquitin Receptor DA1 Interacts with the E3 Ubiquitin Ligase DA2 to Regulate Seed and Organ Size in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 2013, 25, 3347–3359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Li, Y.; Zheng, L.; Corke, F.; Smith, C.; Bevan, M.W. Control of Final Seed and Organ Size by the DA1 Gene Family in Arabidopsis Thaliana. Genes. Dev. 2008, 22, 1331–1336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Mao, H.; Sun, S.; Yao, J.; Wang, C.; Yu, S.; Xu, C.; Li, X.; Zhang, Q. Linking Differential Domain Functions of the GS3 Protein to Natural Variation of Grain Size in Rice. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2010, 107, 19579–19584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Li, N.; Li, Y. Ubiquitin-Mediated Control of Seed Size in Plants. Front. Plant Sci. 2014, 5, 332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Dong, H.; Dumenil, J.; Lu, F.-H.; Na, L.; Vanhaeren, H.; Naumann, C.; Klecker, M.; Prior, R.; Smith, C.; McKenzie, N.; et al. Ubiquitylation Activates a Peptidase That Promotes Cleavage and Destabilization of Its Activating E3 Ligases and Diverse Growth Regulatory Proteins to Limit Cell Proliferation in Arabidopsis. Genes. Dev. 2017, 31, 197–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Huang, K.; Wang, D.; Duan, P.; Zhang, B.; Xu, R.; Li, N.; Li, Y. Wide and Thick Grain 1, Which Encodes an Otubain-like Protease with Deubiquitination Activity, Influences Grain Size and Shape in Rice. Plant J. 2017, 91, 849–860. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Xu, R.; Duan, P.; Yu, H.; Zhou, Z.; Zhang, B.; Wang, R.; Li, J.; Zhang, G.; Zhuang, S.; Lyu, J.; et al. Control of Grain Size and Weight by the OsMKKK10-OsMKK4-OsMAPK6 Signaling Pathway in Rice. Mol. Plant 2018, 11, 860–873. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Zhang, J.; Zhang, X.; Liu, X.; Pai, Q.; Wang, Y.; Wu, X. Molecular Network for Regulation of Seed Size in Plants. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 10666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Jiang, S.; Jin, X.; Liu, Z.; Xu, R.; Hou, C.; Zhang, F.; Fan, C.; Wu, H.; Chen, T.; Shi, J.; et al. Natural Variation in SSW1 Coordinates Seed Growth and Nitrogen Use Efficiency in Arabidopsis. Cell Rep. 2024, 43, 114150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Santiago, J.P.; Tegeder, M. Connecting Source with Sink: The Role of Arabidopsis AAP8 in Phloem Loading of Amino Acids. Plant Physiol. 2016, 171, 508–521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Schmidt, R.; Stransky, H.; Koch, W. The Amino Acid Permease AAP8 Is Important for Early Seed Development in Arabidopsis Thaliana. Planta 2007, 226, 805–813. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Roxrud, I.; Lid, S.E.; Fletcher, J.C.; Schmidt, E.D.L.; Opsahl-Sorteberg, H.-G. GASA4, One of the 14-Member Arabidopsis GASA Family of Small Polypeptides, Regulates Flowering and Seed Development. Plant Cell Physiol. 2007, 48, 471–483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Trapalis, M.; Li, S.F.; Parish, R.W. The Arabidopsis GASA10 Gene Encodes a Cell Wall Protein Strongly Expressed in Developing Anthers and Seeds. Plant Sci. 2017, 260, 71–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Koorneef, M.; Elgersma, A.; Hanhart, C.J.; van Loenen-Martinet, E.P.; van Rijn, L.; Zeevaart, J.A.D. A Gibberellin Insensitive Mutant of Arabidopsis Thaliana. Physiol. Plant. 1985, 65, 33–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Dill, A.; Sun, T. Synergistic Derepression of Gibberellin Signaling by Removing RGA and GAI Function in Arabidopsis Thaliana. Genetics 2001, 159, 777–785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Gomez, M.D.; Ventimilla, D.; Sacristan, R.; Perez-Amador, M.A. Gibberellins Regulate Ovule Integument Development by Interfering with the Transcription Factor ATS. Plant Physiol. 2016, 172, 2403–2415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Gómez, M.D.; Fuster-Almunia, C.; Ocaña-Cuesta, J.; Alonso, J.M.; Pérez-Amador, M.A. RGL2 Controls Flower Development, Ovule Number and Fertility in Arabidopsis. Plant Sci. 2019, 281, 82–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Gómez Jiménez, M.D.; Cored, I.; Barro-Trastoy, D.; Sanchez-Matilla, J.; Tornero, P.; Pérez-Amador, M.Á. DELLA Proteins Positively Regulate Seed Size in Arabidopsis. Development 2023, 150, dev201853. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Klucher, K.M.; Chow, H.; Reiser, L.; Fischer, R.L. The AINTEGUMENTA Gene of Arabidopsis Required for Ovule and Female Gametophyte Development Is Related to the Floral Homeotic Gene APETALA2. Plant Cell 1996, 8, 137–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Wing, I.S.; De Cian, E.; Mistry, M.N. Global Vulnerability of Crop Yields to Climate Change. J. Environ. Econ. Manag. 2021, 109, 102462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Gasparis, S.; Miłoszewski, M.M. Genetic Basis of Grain Size and Weight in Rice, Wheat, and Barley. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 16921. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Xu, G.; Zhang, X.; Xu, G.; Zhang, X. Mechanisms Controlling Seed Size by Early Endosperm Development. Seed Biol. 2023, 2, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Disch, S.; Anastasiou, E.; Sharma, V.K.; Laux, T.; Fletcher, J.C.; Lenhard, M. The E3 Ubiquitin Ligase BIG BROTHER Controls Arabidopsis Organ Size in a Dosage-Dependent Manner. Curr. Biol. 2006, 16, 272–279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Chen, Y.; Vermeersch, M.; Van Leene, J.; De Jaeger, G.; Li, Y.; Vanhaeren, H. A Dynamic Ubiquitination Balance of Cell Proliferation and Endoreduplication Regulators Determines Plant Organ Size. Sci. Adv. 2024, 10, eadj2570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Wu, X.; Cai, X.; Zhang, B.; Wu, S.; Wang, R.; Li, N.; Li, Y.; Sun, Y.; Tang, W. ERECTA Regulates Seed Size Independently of Its Intracellular Domain via MAPK-DA1-UBP15 Signaling. Plant Cell 2022, 34, 3773–3789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Guo, T.; Lu, Z.-Q.; Shan, J.-X.; Ye, W.-W.; Dong, N.-Q.; Lin, H.-X. ERECTA1 Acts Upstream of the OsMKKK10-OsMKK4-OsMPK6 Cascade to Control Spikelet Number by Regulating Cytokinin Metabolism in Rice. Plant Cell 2020, 32, 2763–2779. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Shpak, E.D.; Lakeman, M.B.; Torii, K.U. Dominant-Negative Receptor Uncovers Redundancy in the Arabidopsis ERECTA Leucine-Rich Repeat Receptor–Like Kinase Signaling Pathway That Regulates Organ Shape. Plant Cell 2003, 15, 1095–1110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Shpak, E.D.; Berthiaume, C.T.; Hill, E.J.; Torii, K.U. Synergistic Interaction of Three ERECTA-Family Receptor-like Kinases Controls Arabidopsis Organ Growth and Flower Development by Promoting Cell Proliferation. Development 2004, 131, 1491–1501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Wang, H.; Ngwenyama, N.; Liu, Y.; Walker, J.C.; Zhang, S. Stomatal Development and Patterning Are Regulated by Environmentally Responsive Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinases in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 2007, 19, 63–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Zhang, M.; Zhang, S. Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase Cascades in Plant Signaling. J. Integr. Plant Biol. 2022, 64, 301–341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Meng, X.; Wang, H.; He, Y.; Liu, Y.; Walker, J.C.; Torii, K.U.; Zhang, S. A MAPK Cascade Downstream of ERECTA Receptor-Like Protein Kinase Regulates Arabidopsis Inflorescence Architecture by Promoting Localized Cell Proliferation. Plant Cell 2012, 24, 4948–4960. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Wang, J.-L.; Tang, M.-Q.; Chen, S.; Zheng, X.-F.; Mo, H.-X.; Li, S.-J.; Wang, Z.; Zhu, K.-M.; Ding, L.-N.; Liu, S.-Y.; et al. Down-Regulation of BnDA1, Whose Gene Locus Is Associated with the Seeds Weight, Improves the Seeds Weight and Organ Size in Brassica Napus. Plant Biotechnol. J. 2017, 15, 1024–1033. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Xie, G.; Li, Z.; Ran, Q.; Wang, H.; Zhang, J. Over-Expression of Mutated ZmDA1 or ZmDAR1 Gene Improves Maize Kernel Yield by Enhancing Starch Synthesis. Plant Biotechnol. J. 2018, 16, 234–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Shi, C.; Ren, Y.; Liu, L.; Wang, F.; Zhang, H.; Tian, P.; Pan, T.; Wang, Y.; Jing, R.; Liu, T.; et al. Ubiquitin Specific Protease 15 Has an Important Role in Regulating Grain Width and Size in Rice. Plant Physiol. 2019, 180, 381–391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Strasser, R. Protein Quality Control in the Endoplasmic Reticulum of Plants. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2018, 69, 147–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Vembar, S.S.; Brodsky, J.L. One Step at a Time: Endoplasmic Reticulum-Associated Degradation. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2008, 9, 944–957. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Li, J.; Zhang, B.; Duan, P.; Yan, L.; Yu, H.; Zhang, L.; Li, N.; Zheng, L.; Chai, T.; Xu, R.; et al. An Endoplasmic Reticulum-Associated Degradation-Related E2-E3 Enzyme Pair Controls Grain Size and Weight through the Brassinosteroid Signaling Pathway in Rice. Plant Cell 2023, 35, 1076–1091. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Kurepa, J.; Wang, S.; Li, Y.; Zaitlin, D.; Pierce, A.J.; Smalle, J.A. Loss of 26S Proteasome Function Leads to Increased Cell Size and Decreased Cell Number in Arabidopsis Shoot Organs. Plant Physiol. 2009, 150, 178–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Yu, P.; Hua, Z. The Ubiquitin–26S Proteasome System and Autophagy Relay Proteome Homeostasis Regulation during Silique Development. Plant J. 2022, 111, 1324–1339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Garcia, D.; Saingery, V.; Chambrier, P.; Mayer, U.; Jürgens, G.; Berger, F. Arabidopsis Haiku Mutants Reveal New Controls of Seed Size by Endosperm. Plant Physiol. 2003, 131, 1661–1670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Wang, A.; Garcia, D.; Zhang, H.; Feng, K.; Chaudhury, A.; Berger, F.; Peacock, W.J.; Dennis, E.S.; Luo, M. The VQ Motif Protein IKU1 Regulates Endosperm Growth and Seed Size in Arabidopsis. Plant J. 2010, 63, 670–679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Luo, M.; Dennis, E.S.; Berger, F.; Peacock, W.J.; Chaudhury, A. MINISEED3 (MINI3), a WRKY Family Gene, and HAIKU2 (IKU2), a Leucine-Rich Repeat (LRR) KINASE Gene, Are Regulators of Seed Size in Arabidopsis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2005, 102, 17531–17536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Kang, X.; Li, W.; Zhou, Y.; Ni, M. A WRKY Transcription Factor Recruits the SYG1-Like Protein SHB1 to Activate Gene Expression and Seed Cavity Enlargement. PLOS Genet. 2013, 9, e1003347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Zhou, Y.; Zhang, X.; Kang, X.; Zhao, X.; Zhang, X.; Ni, M. SHORT HYPOCOTYL UNDER BLUE1 Associates with MINISEED3 and HAIKU2 Promoters in Vivo to Regulate Arabidopsis Seed Development. Plant Cell 2009, 21, 106–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Cheng, Z.J.; Zhao, X.Y.; Shao, X.X.; Wang, F.; Zhou, C.; Liu, Y.G.; Zhang, Y.; Zhang, X.S. Abscisic Acid Regulates Early Seed Development in Arabidopsis by ABI5-Mediated Transcription of SHORT HYPOCOTYL UNDER BLUE1. Plant Cell 2014, 26, 1053–1068. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Jiang, W.-B.; Huang, H.-Y.; Hu, Y.-W.; Zhu, S.-W.; Wang, Z.-Y.; Lin, W.-H. Brassinosteroid Regulates Seed Size and Shape in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 2013, 162, 1965–1977. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Hutchison, C.E.; Li, J.; Argueso, C.; Gonzalez, M.; Lee, E.; Lewis, M.W.; Maxwell, B.B.; Perdue, T.D.; Schaller, G.E.; Alonso, J.M.; et al. The Arabidopsis Histidine Phosphotransfer Proteins Are Redundant Positive Regulators of Cytokinin Signaling. Plant Cell 2006, 18, 3073–3087. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Riefler, M.; Novak, O.; Strnad, M.; Schmülling, T. Arabidopsis Cytokinin Receptor Mutants Reveal Functions in Shoot Growth, Leaf Senescence, Seed Size, Germination, Root Development, and Cytokinin Metabolism. Plant Cell 2006, 18, 40–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Ashikari, M.; Sakakibara, H.; Lin, S.; Yamamoto, T.; Takashi, T.; Nishimura, A.; Angeles, E.R.; Qian, Q.; Kitano, H.; Matsuoka, M. Cytokinin Oxidase Regulates Rice Grain Production. Science 2005, 309, 741–745. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Bartrina, I.; Otto, E.; Strnad, M.; Werner, T.; Schmülling, T. Cytokinin Regulates the Activity of Reproductive Meristems, Flower Organ Size, Ovule Formation, and Thus Seed Yield in Arabidopsis Thaliana. Plant Cell 2011, 23, 69–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Li, J.; Nie, X.; Tan, J.L.H.; Berger, F. Integration of Epigenetic and Genetic Controls of Seed Size by Cytokinin in Arabidopsis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2013, 110, 15479–15484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Zhang, H.; Cheng, F.; Xiao, Y.; Kang, X.; Wang, X.; Kuang, R.; Ni, M. Global Analysis of Canola Genes Targeted by SHORT HYPOCOTYL UNDER BLUE 1 during Endosperm and Embryo Development. Plant J. 2017, 91, 158–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Mozgova, I.; Köhler, C.; Hennig, L. Keeping the Gate Closed: Functions of the Polycomb Repressive Complex PRC2 in Development. Plant J. 2015, 83, 121–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Wu, D.; Wei, Y.; Zhao, X.; Li, B.; Zhang, H.; Xu, G.; Lv, J.; Zhang, D.; Zhang, X.; Ni, M. Ancestral Function but Divergent Epigenetic Regulation of HAIKU2 Reveals Routes of Seed Developmental Evolution. Mol. Plant 2022, 15, 1575–1589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Aegerter-Wilmsen, T.; Heimlicher, M.B.; Smith, A.C.; de Reuille, P.B.; Smith, R.S.; Aegerter, C.M.; Basler, K. Integrating Force-Sensing and Signaling Pathways in a Model for the Regulation of Wing Imaginal Disc Size. Development 2012, 139, 3221–3231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Shraiman, B.I. Mechanical Feedback as a Possible Regulator of Tissue Growth. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2005, 102, 3318–3323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Nakayama, N.; Smith, R.S.; Mandel, T.; Robinson, S.; Kimura, S.; Boudaoud, A.; Kuhlemeier, C. Mechanical Regulation of Auxin-Mediated Growth. Curr. Biol. 2012, 22, 1468–1476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Uyttewaal, M.; Burian, A.; Alim, K.; Landrein, B.; Borowska-Wykręt, D.; Dedieu, A.; Peaucelle, A.; Ludynia, M.; Traas, J.; Boudaoud, A.; et al. Mechanical Stress Acts via Katanin to Amplify Differences in Growth Rate between Adjacent Cells in Arabidopsis. Cell 2012, 149, 439–451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Fal, K.; Korsbo, N.; Alonso-Serra, J.; Teles, J.; Liu, M.; Refahi, Y.; Chabouté, M.-E.; Jönsson, H.; Hamant, O. Tissue Folding at the Organ–Meristem Boundary Results in Nuclear Compression and Chromatin Compaction. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2021, 118, e2017859118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Landrein, B.; Kiss, A.; Sassi, M.; Chauvet, A.; Das, P.; Cortizo, M.; Laufs, P.; Takeda, S.; Aida, M.; Traas, J.; et al. Mechanical Stress Contributes to the Expression of the STM Homeobox Gene in Arabidopsis Shoot Meristems. eLife 2015, 4, e07811. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Beauzamy, L.; Nakayama, N.; Boudaoud, A. Flowers under Pressure: Ins and Outs of Turgor Regulation in Development. Ann. Bot. 2014, 114, 1517–1533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Ali, O.; Cheddadi, I.; Landrein, B.; Long, Y. Revisiting the Relationship between Turgor Pressure and Plant Cell Growth. New Phytol. 2023, 238, 62–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Beauzamy, L.; Fourquin, C.; Dubrulle, N.; Boursiac, Y.; Boudaoud, A.; Ingram, G. Endosperm Turgor Pressure Decreases during Early Arabidopsis Seed Development. Development 2016, 143, 3295–3299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Creff, A.; Ali, O.; Bied, C.; Bayle, V.; Ingram, G.; Landrein, B. Evidence That Endosperm Turgor Pressure Both Promotes and Restricts Seed Growth and Size. Nat. Commun. 2023, 14, 67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Zhang, X.; Wang, Y.; Liu, M.; Yan, P.; Niu, F.; Ma, F.; Hu, J.; He, S.; Cui, J.; Yuan, X.; et al. OsEXPA7 Encoding an Expansin Affects Grain Size and Quality Traits in Rice (Oryza sativa L.). Rice 2024, 17, 36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Creff, A.; Brocard, L.; Ingram, G. A Mechanically Sensitive Cell Layer Regulates the Physical Properties of the Arabidopsis Seed Coat. Nat. Commun. 2015, 6, 6382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Chateigner-Boutin, A.-L.; Lapierre, C.; Alvarado, C.; Yoshinaga, A.; Barron, C.; Bouchet, B.; Bakan, B.; Saulnier, L.; Devaux, M.-F.; Girousse, C.; et al. Ferulate and Lignin Cross-Links Increase in Cell Walls of Wheat Grain Outer Layers during Late Development. Plant Sci. 2018, 276, 199–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Schopfer, P. Biomechanics of Plant Growth. Am. J. Bot. 2006, 93, 1415–1425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Kierzkowski, D.; Nakayama, N.; Routier-Kierzkowska, A.-L.; Weber, A.; Bayer, E.; Schorderet, M.; Reinhardt, D.; Kuhlemeier, C.; Smith, R.S. Elastic Domains Regulate Growth and Organogenesis in the Plant Shoot Apical Meristem. Science 2012, 335, 1096–1099. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Kutschera, U. Cessation of Cell Elongation in Rye Coleoptiles Is Accompanied by a Loss of Cell-Wall Plasticity. J. Exp. Bot. 1996, 47, 1387–1394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Cosgrove, D.J. Nanoscale Structure, Mechanics and Growth of Epidermal Cell Walls. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2018, 46, 77–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Levesque-Tremblay, G.; Pelloux, J.; Braybrook, S.A.; Müller, K. Tuning of Pectin Methylesterification: Consequences for Cell Wall Biomechanics and Development. Planta 2015, 242, 791–811. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Peaucelle, A.; Braybrook, S.A.; Le Guillou, L.; Bron, E.; Kuhlemeier, C.; Höfte, H. Pectin-Induced Changes in Cell Wall Mechanics Underlie Organ Initiation in Arabidopsis. Curr. Biol. 2011, 21, 1720–1726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Parre, E.; Geitmann, A. Pectin and the Role of the Physical Properties of the Cell Wall in Pollen Tube Growth of Solanum Chacoense. Planta 2005, 220, 582–592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Müller, K.; Levesque-Tremblay, G.; Bartels, S.; Weitbrecht, K.; Wormit, A.; Usadel, B.; Haughn, G.; Kermode, A.R. Demethylesterification of Cell Wall Pectins in Arabidopsis Plays a Role in Seed Germination. Plant Physiol. 2013, 161, 305–316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Di Marzo, M.; Babolin, N.; Viana, V.E.; de Oliveira, A.C.; Gugi, B.; Caporali, E.; Herrera-Ubaldo, H.; Martínez-Estrada, E.; Driouich, A.; de Folter, S.; et al. The Genetic Control of SEEDSTICK and LEUNIG-HOMOLOG in Seed and Fruit Development: New Insights into Cell Wall Control. Plants 2022, 11, 3146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Vogel, J. Unique Aspects of the Grass Cell Wall. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2008, 11, 301–307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Yang, X.; Wilkinson, L.G.; Aubert, M.K.; Houston, K.; Shirley, N.J.; Tucker, M.R. Ovule Cell Wall Composition Is a Maternal Determinant of Grain Size in Barley. New Phytol. 2023, 237, 2136–2147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Stork, J.; Harris, D.; Griffiths, J.; Williams, B.; Beisson, F.; Li-Beisson, Y.; Mendu, V.; Haughn, G.; DeBolt, S. CELLULOSE SYNTHASE9 Serves a Nonredundant Role in Secondary Cell Wall Synthesis in Arabidopsis Epidermal Testa Cells. Plant Physiol. 2010, 153, 580–589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  92. Mendu, V.; Griffiths, J.S.; Persson, S.; Stork, J.; Downie, A.B.; Voiniciuc, C.; Haughn, G.W.; DeBolt, S. Subfunctionalization of Cellulose Synthases in Seed Coat Epidermal Cells Mediates Secondary Radial Wall Synthesis and Mucilage Attachment. Plant Physiol. 2011, 157, 441–453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Wolf, S.; Hématy, K.; Höfte, H. Growth Control and Cell Wall Signaling in Plants. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2012, 63, 381–407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. McQueen-Mason, S.J.; Cosgrove, D.J. Expansin Mode of Action on Cell Walls (Analysis of Wall Hydrolysis, Stress Relaxation, and Binding). Plant Physiol. 1995, 107, 87–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. Yennawar, N.H.; Li, L.-C.; Dudzinski, D.M.; Tabuchi, A.; Cosgrove, D.J. Crystal Structure and Activities of EXPB1 (Zea m 1), a β-Expansin and Group-1 Pollen Allergen from Maize. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2006, 103, 14664–14671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Sun, Q.; Li, Y.; Gong, D.; Hu, A.; Zhong, W.; Zhao, H.; Ning, Q.; Tan, Z.; Liang, K.; Mu, L.; et al. A NAC-EXPANSIN Module Enhances Maize Kernel Size by Controlling Nucellus Elimination. Nat. Commun. 2022, 13, 5708. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  97. Calderini, D.F.; Castillo, F.M.; Arenas-M, A.; Molero, G.; Reynolds, M.P.; Craze, M.; Bowden, S.; Milner, M.J.; Wallington, E.J.; Dowle, A.; et al. Overcoming the Trade-off between Grain Weight and Number in Wheat by the Ectopic Expression of Expansin in Developing Seeds Leads to Increased Yield Potential. New Phytol. 2021, 230, 629–640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  98. Tan, J.; Wang, M.; Shi, Z.; Miao, X. OsEXPA10 Mediates the Balance between Growth and Resistance to Biotic Stress in Rice. Plant Cell Rep. 2018, 37, 993–1002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  99. Chen, S.; Luo, Y.; Wang, G.; Feng, C.; Li, H. Genome-Wide Identification of Expansin Genes in Brachypodium Distachyon and Functional Characterization of BdEXPA27. Plant Sci. 2020, 296, 110490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Bae, J.M.; Kwak, M.S.; Noh, S.A.; Oh, M.-J.; Kim, Y.-S.; Shin, J.S. Overexpression of Sweetpotato Expansin cDNA (IbEXP1) Increases Seed Yield in Arabidopsis. Transgenic Res. 2014, 23, 657–667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Vaahtera, L.; Schulz, J.; Hamann, T. Cell Wall Integrity Maintenance during Plant Development and Interaction with the Environment. Nat. Plant. 2019, 5, 924–932. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  102. Bacete, L.; Hamann, T. The Role of Mechanoperception in Plant Cell Wall Integrity Maintenance. Plants 2020, 9, 574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  103. Guo, H.; Li, L.; Ye, H.; Yu, X.; Algreen, A.; Yin, Y. Three Related Receptor-like Kinases Are Required for Optimal Cell Elongation in Arabidopsis Thaliana. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2009, 106, 7648–7653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  104. Duan, Q.; Kita, D.; Li, C.; Cheung, A.Y.; Wu, H.-M. FERONIA Receptor-like Kinase Regulates RHO GTPase Signaling of Root Hair Development. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2010, 107, 17821–17826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  105. Nibau, C.; Wu, H.; Cheung, A.Y. RAC/ROP GTPases: “hubs” for Signal Integration and Diversification in Plants. Trends Plant Sci. 2006, 11, 309–315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  106. Yu, F.; Li, J.; Huang, Y.; Liu, L.; Li, D.; Chen, L.; Luan, S. FERONIA Receptor Kinase Controls Seed Size in Arabidopsis Thaliana. Mol. Plant 2014, 7, 920–922. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  107. Wang, L.; Wang, D.; Yang, Z.; Jiang, S.; Qu, J.; He, W.; Liu, Z.; Xing, J.; Ma, Y.; Lin, Q.; et al. Roles of FERONIA-like Receptor Genes in Regulating Grain Size and Quality in Rice. Sci. China Life Sci. 2021, 64, 294–310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  108. Engelsdorf, T.; Gigli-Bisceglia, N.; Veerabagu, M.; McKenna, J.F.; Vaahtera, L.; Augstein, F.; Van der Does, D.; Zipfel, C.; Hamann, T. The Plant Cell Wall Integrity Maintenance and Immune Signaling Systems Cooperate to Control Stress Responses in Arabidopsis Thaliana. Sci. Signal. 2018, 11, eaao3070. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Mielke, S.; Zimmer, M.; Meena, M.K.; Dreos, R.; Stellmach, H.; Hause, B.; Voiniciuc, C.; Gasperini, D. Jasmonate Biosynthesis Arising from Altered Cell Walls Is Prompted by Turgor-Driven Mechanical Compression. Sci. Adv. 2021, 7, eabf0356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Lorrai, R.; Erguvan, Ö.; Raggi, S.; Jonsson, K.; Široká, J.; Tarkowská, D.; Novák, O.; Verger, S.; Robert, S.; Ferrari, S. Cell Wall Integrity Modulates a PHYTOCHROME-INTERACTING FACTOR (PIF)—HOOKLESS1 (HLS1) Signalling Module Controlling Apical Hook Formation in Arabidopsis. bioRxiv 2023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Yan, J.; Zhang, C.; Gu, M.; Bai, Z.; Zhang, W.; Qi, T.; Cheng, Z.; Peng, W.; Luo, H.; Nan, F.; et al. The Arabidopsis CORONATINE INSENSITIVE1 Protein Is a Jasmonate Receptor. Plant Cell 2009, 21, 2220–2236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Yan, J.; Yao, R.; Chen, L.; Li, S.; Gu, M.; Nan, F.; Xie, D. Dynamic Perception of Jasmonates by the F-Box Protein COI1. Mol. Plant 2018, 11, 1237–1247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Hu, S.; Yang, H.; Gao, H.; Yan, J.; Xie, D. Control of Seed Size by Jasmonate. Sci. China Life Sci. 2021, 64, 1215–1226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Mehra, P.; Pandey, B.K.; Verma, L.; Prusty, A.; Singh, A.P.; Sharma, S.; Malik, N.; Bennett, M.J.; Parida, S.K.; Giri, J.; et al. OsJAZ11 Regulates Spikelet and Seed Development in Rice. Plant Direct 2022, 6, e401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Chen, Y.; Yan, Y.; Wu, T.-T.; Zhang, G.-L.; Yin, H.; Chen, W.; Wang, S.; Chang, F.; Gou, J.-Y. Cloning of Wheat Keto-Acyl Thiolase 2B Reveals a Role of Jasmonic Acid in Grain Weight Determination. Nat. Commun. 2020, 11, 6266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Yang, L.; Song, W.; Xu, C.; Sapey, E.; Jiang, D.; Wu, C. Effects of High Night Temperature on Soybean Yield and Compositions. Front. Plant Sci. 2023, 14, 1065604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Kino, R.I.; Pellny, T.K.; Mitchell, R.A.C.; Gonzalez-Uriarte, A.; Tosi, P. High Post-Anthesis Temperature Effects on Bread Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) Grain Transcriptome during Early Grain-Filling. BMC Plant Biol. 2020, 20, 170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  118. Kumar, R.; Khungar, L.; Shimphrui, R.; Tiwari, L.D.; Tripathi, G.; Sarkar, N.K.; Agarwal, S.-K.; Agarwal, M.; Grover, A. AtHsp101 Research Sets Course of Action for the Genetic Improvement of Crops against Heat Stress. J. Plant Biochem. Biotechnol. 2020, 29, 715–732. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Tiwari, L.D.; Kumar, R.; Sharma, V.; Sahu, A.K.; Sahu, B.; Naithani, S.C.; Grover, A. Stress and Development Phenotyping of Hsp101 and Diverse Other Hsp Mutants of Arabidopsis Thaliana. J. Plant Biochem. Biotechnol. 2021, 30, 889–905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Singh, G.; Sarkar, N.K.; Grover, A. Hsp70, sHsps and Ubiquitin Proteins Modulate HsfA6a-Mediated Hsp101 Transcript Expression in Rice (Oryza sativa L.). Physiol. Plant. 2021, 173, 2055–2067. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Song, Z.; Li, Y.; Jia, Y.; Lian, W.; Jia, H. An Endoplasmic Reticulum-Localized NtHSP70-8 Confers Drought Tolerance in Tobacco by Regulating Water Loss and Antioxidant Capacity. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2021, 188, 104519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Gomez-Cadenas, A.; Vives, V.; Zandalinas, S.I.; Manzi, M.; Sanchez-Perez, A.M.; Perez-Clemente, R.M.; Arbona, V. Abscisic Acid: A Versatile Phytohormone in Plant Signaling and Beyond. Curr. Protein Pept. Sci. 2015, 16, 413–434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Suzuki, N.; Bassil, E.; Hamilton, J.S.; Inupakutika, M.A.; Zandalinas, S.I.; Tripathy, D.; Luo, Y.; Dion, E.; Fukui, G.; Kumazaki, A.; et al. ABA Is Required for Plant Acclimation to a Combination of Salt and Heat Stress. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0147625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  124. Zhang, X.; Li, J.; Li, M.; Zhang, S.; Song, S.; Wang, W.; Wang, S.; Chang, J.; Xia, Z.; Zhang, S.; et al. NtHSP70-8b Positively Regulates Heat Tolerance and Seed Size in Nicotiana Tabacum. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2023, 201, 107901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  125. Yang, Y.; Ma, X.; Xia, H.; Wang, L.; Chen, S.; Xu, K.; Yang, F.; Zou, Y.; Wang, Y.; Zhu, J.; et al. Natural Variation of Alfin-like Family Affects Seed Size and Drought Tolerance in Rice. Plant J. 2022, 112, 1176–1193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  126. Lampayan, R.M.; Rejesus, R.M.; Singleton, G.R.; Bouman, B.A. Adoption and Economics of Alternate Wetting and Drying Water Management for Irrigated Lowland Rice. Field Crop. Res. 2015, 170, 95–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Dong, N.-Q.; Sun, Y.; Guo, T.; Shi, C.-L.; Zhang, Y.-M.; Kan, Y.; Xiang, Y.-H.; Zhang, H.; Yang, Y.-B.; Li, Y.-C.; et al. UDP-Glucosyltransferase Regulates Grain Size and Abiotic Stress Tolerance Associated with Metabolic Flux Redirection in Rice. Nat. Commun. 2020, 11, 2629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  128. Liu, L.; Tong, H.; Xiao, Y.; Che, R.; Xu, F.; Hu, B.; Liang, C.; Chu, J.; Li, J.; Chu, C. Activation of Big Grain1 Significantly Improves Grain Size by Regulating Auxin Transport in Rice. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2015, 112, 11102–11107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Guo, T.; Chen, K.; Dong, N.-Q.; Ye, W.-W.; Shan, J.-X.; Lin, H.-X. Tillering and Small Grain 1 Dominates the Tryptophan Aminotransferase Family Required for Local Auxin Biosynthesis in Rice. J. Integr. Plant Biol. 2020, 62, 581–600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Nakabayashi, R.; Yonekura-Sakakibara, K.; Urano, K.; Suzuki, M.; Yamada, Y.; Nishizawa, T.; Matsuda, F.; Kojima, M.; Sakakibara, H.; Shinozaki, K.; et al. Enhancement of Oxidative and Drought Tolerance in Arabidopsis by Overaccumulation of Antioxidant Flavonoids. Plant J. 2014, 77, 367–379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Johansson, M.; Staiger, D. Time to Flower: Interplay between Photoperiod and the Circadian Clock. J. Exp. Bot. 2015, 66, 719–730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Yu, B.; He, X.; Tang, Y.; Chen, Z.; Zhou, L.; Li, X.; Zhang, C.; Huang, X.; Yang, Y.; Zhang, W.; et al. Photoperiod Controls Plant Seed Size in a CONSTANS-Dependent Manner. Nat. Plants 2023, 9, 343–354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  133. Cai, X.; Fan, J.; Jiang, Z.; Basso, B.; Sala, F.; Spada, A.; Grassi, F.; Lu, B.-R. The Puzzle of Italian Rice Origin and Evolution: Determining Genetic Divergence and Affinity of Rice Germplasm from Italy and Asia. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e80351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Chen, R.; Xiao, N.; Lu, Y.; Tao, T.; Huang, Q.; Wang, S.; Wang, Z.; Chuan, M.; Bu, Q.; Lu, Z.; et al. A de Novo Evolved Gene Contributes to Rice Grain Shape Difference between Indica and Japonica. Nat. Commun. 2023, 14, 5906. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  135. Wang, A.; Hou, Q.; Si, L.; Huang, X.; Luo, J.; Lu, D.; Zhu, J.; Shangguan, Y.; Miao, J.; Xie, Y.; et al. The PLATZ Transcription Factor GL6 Affects Grain Length and Number in Rice. Plant Physiol. 2019, 180, 2077–2090. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  136. Wang, Y.; Xiong, G.; Hu, J.; Jiang, L.; Yu, H.; Xu, J.; Fang, Y.; Zeng, L.; Xu, E.; Xu, J.; et al. Copy Number Variation at the GL7 Locus Contributes to Grain Size Diversity in Rice. Nat. Genet. 2015, 47, 944–948. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Qi, P.; Lin, Y.-S.; Song, X.-J.; Shen, J.-B.; Huang, W.; Shan, J.-X.; Zhu, M.-Z.; Jiang, L.; Gao, J.-P.; Lin, H.-X. The Novel Quantitative Trait Locus GL3.1 Controls Rice Grain Size and Yield by Regulating Cyclin-T1;3. Cell Res. 2012, 22, 1666–1680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. Zhang, Y.-M.; Yu, H.-X.; Ye, W.-W.; Shan, J.-X.; Dong, N.-Q.; Guo, T.; Kan, Y.; Xiang, Y.-H.; Zhang, H.; Yang, Y.-B.; et al. A Rice QTL GS3.1 Regulates Grain Size through Metabolic-Flux Distribution between Flavonoid and Lignin Metabolons without Affecting Stress Tolerance. Commun. Biol. 2021, 4, 1171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  139. Shi, C.-L.; Dong, N.-Q.; Guo, T.; Ye, W.-W.; Shan, J.-X.; Lin, H.-X. A Quantitative Trait Locus GW6 Controls Rice Grain Size and Yield through the Gibberellin Pathway. Plant J. 2020, 103, 1174–1188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Fan, C.; Xing, Y.; Mao, H.; Lu, T.; Han, B.; Xu, C.; Li, X.; Zhang, Q. GS3, a Major QTL for Grain Length and Weight and Minor QTL for Grain Width and Thickness in Rice, Encodes a Putative Transmembrane Protein. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2006, 112, 1164–1171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Weng, J.; Gu, S.; Wan, X.; Gao, H.; Guo, T.; Su, N.; Lei, C.; Zhang, X.; Cheng, Z.; Guo, X.; et al. Isolation and Initial Characterization of GW5, a Major QTL Associated with Rice Grain Width and Weight. Cell Res. 2008, 18, 1199–1209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. Liu, J.; Chen, J.; Zheng, X.; Wu, F.; Lin, Q.; Heng, Y.; Tian, P.; Cheng, Z.; Yu, X.; Zhou, K.; et al. GW5 Acts in the Brassinosteroid Signalling Pathway to Regulate Grain Width and Weight in Rice. Nat. Plants 2017, 3, 17043. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  143. Song, X.-J.; Huang, W.; Shi, M.; Zhu, M.-Z.; Lin, H.-X. A QTL for Rice Grain Width and Weight Encodes a Previously Unknown RING-Type E3 Ubiquitin Ligase. Nat. Genet. 2007, 39, 623–630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  144. Che, R.; Tong, H.; Shi, B.; Liu, Y.; Fang, S.; Liu, D.; Xiao, Y.; Hu, B.; Liu, L.; Wang, H.; et al. Control of Grain Size and Rice Yield by GL2-Mediated Brassinosteroid Responses. Nat. Plants 2015, 2, 15195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  145. Chen, E.; Hou, Q.; Liu, K.; Gu, Z.; Dai, B.; Wang, A.; Feng, Q.; Zhao, Y.; Zhou, C.; Zhu, J.; et al. Armadillo Repeat Only Protein GS10 Negatively Regulates Brassinosteroid Signaling to Control Rice Grain Size. Plant Physiol. 2023, 192, 967–981. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  146. Abbas, W.; Shalmani, A.; Zhang, J.; Sun, Q.; Zhang, C.; Li, W.; Cui, Y.; Xiong, M.; Li, Y. The GW5-WRKY53-SGW5 Module Regulates Grain Size Variation in Rice. New Phytol. 2024, 242, 2011–2025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  147. Botella, J.R. Can Heterotrimeric G Proteins Help to Feed the World? Trends Plant Sci. 2012, 17, 563–568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  148. Sun, S.; Wang, L.; Mao, H.; Shao, L.; Li, X.; Xiao, J.; Ouyang, Y.; Zhang, Q. A G-Protein Pathway Determines Grain Size in Rice. Nat. Commun. 2018, 9, 851. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  149. Yang, W.; Wu, K.; Wang, B.; Liu, H.; Guo, S.; Guo, X.; Luo, W.; Sun, S.; Ouyang, Y.; Fu, X.; et al. The RING E3 Ligase CLG1 Targets GS3 for Degradation via the Endosome Pathway to Determine Grain Size in Rice. Mol. Plant 2021, 14, 1699–1713. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  150. Shomura, A.; Izawa, T.; Ebana, K.; Ebitani, T.; Kanegae, H.; Konishi, S.; Yano, M. Deletion in a Gene Associated with Grain Size Increased Yields during Rice Domestication. Nat. Genet. 2008, 40, 1023–1028. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  151. Wan, X.; Weng, J.; Zhai, H.; Wang, J.; Lei, C.; Liu, X.; Guo, T.; Jiang, L.; Su, N.; Wan, J. Quantitative Trait Loci (QTL) Analysis For Rice Grain Width and Fine Mapping of an Identified QTL Allele Gw-5 in a Recombination Hotspot Region on Chromosome 5. Genetics 2008, 179, 2239–2252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  152. Duan, P.; Xu, J.; Zeng, D.; Zhang, B.; Geng, M.; Zhang, G.; Huang, K.; Huang, L.; Xu, R.; Ge, S.; et al. Natural Variation in the Promoter of GSE5 Contributes to Grain Size Diversity in Rice. Mol. Plant 2017, 10, 685–694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  153. Chen, X.; Hu, X.; Jiang, J.; Wang, X. Functions and Mechanisms of Brassinosteroids in Regulating Crop Agronomic Traits. Plant Cell Physiol. 2024, pcae044. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  154. Tian, X.; He, M.; Mei, E.; Zhang, B.; Tang, J.; Xu, M.; Liu, J.; Li, X.; Wang, Z.; Tang, W.; et al. WRKY53 Integrates Classic Brassinosteroid Signaling and the Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase Pathway to Regulate Rice Architecture and Seed Size. Plant Cell 2021, 33, 2753–2775. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  155. Liu, D.; Zhang, X.; Li, Q.; Xiao, Y.; Zhang, G.; Yin, W.; Niu, M.; Meng, W.; Dong, N.; Liu, J.; et al. The U-Box Ubiquitin Ligase TUD1 Promotes Brassinosteroid-Induced GSK2 Degradation in Rice. Plant Commun. 2022, 4, 100450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  156. Huang, J.; Chen, Z.; Lin, J.; Guan, B.; Chen, J.; Zhang, Z.; Chen, F.; Jiang, L.; Zheng, J.; Wang, T.; et al. Gw2.1, a New Allele of GW2, Improves Grain Weight and Grain Yield in Rice. Plant Sci. 2022, 325, 111495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  157. Choi, B.S.; Kim, Y.J.; Markkandan, K.; Koo, Y.J.; Song, J.T.; Seo, H.S. GW2 Functions as an E3 Ubiquitin Ligase for Rice Expansin-Like 1. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 1904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  158. Hao, J.; Wang, D.; Wu, Y.; Huang, K.; Duan, P.; Li, N.; Xu, R.; Zeng, D.; Dong, G.; Zhang, B.; et al. The GW2-WG1-OsbZIP47 Pathway Controls Grain Size and Weight in Rice. Mol. Plant 2021, 14, 1266–1280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  159. Ma, B.; Zhang, L.; He, Z. Understanding the Regulation of Cereal Grain Filling: The Way Forward. J. Integr. Plant Biol. 2023, 65, 526–547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  160. Achary, V.M.M.; Reddy, M.K. CRISPR-Cas9 Mediated Mutation in GRAIN WIDTH and WEIGHT2 (GW2) Locus Improves Aleurone Layer and Grain Nutritional Quality in Rice. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 21941. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  161. Holdsworth, M.J.; Bentsink, L.; Soppe, W.J.J. Molecular Networks Regulating Arabidopsis Seed Maturation, After-ripening, Dormancy and Germination. New Phytol. 2008, 179, 33–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  162. Guo, Y.; Gao, M.; Liang, X.; Xu, M.; Liu, X.; Zhang, Y.; Liu, X.; Liu, J.; Gao, Y.; Qu, S.; et al. Quantitative Trait Loci for Seed Size Variation in Cucurbits—A Review. Front. Plant Sci. 2020, 11, 304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  163. Miao, C.; Wang, D.; He, R.; Liu, S.; Zhu, J.-K. Mutations in MIR396e and MIR396f Increase Grain Size and Modulate Shoot Architecture in Rice. Plant Biotechnol. J. 2020, 18, 491–501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  164. Wang, W.; Pan, Q.; Tian, B.; He, F.; Chen, Y.; Bai, G.; Akhunova, A.; Trick, H.N.; Akhunov, E. Gene Editing of the Wheat Homologs of TONNEAU 1-recruiting Motif Encoding Gene Affects Grain Shape and Weight in Wheat. Plant J. 2019, 100, 251–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  165. Gómez-Cadenas, A.; Zentella, R.; Walker-Simmons, M.K.; Ho, T.-H.D. Gibberellin/Abscisic Acid Antagonism in Barley Aleurone Cells: Site of Action of the Protein Kinase PKABA1 in Relation to Gibberellin Signaling Molecules. Plant Cell 2001, 13, 667–679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  166. Asatsuma, S.; Sawada, C.; Itoh, K.; Okito, M.; Kitajima, A.; Mitsui, T. Involvement of Alpha-Amylase I-1 in Starch Degradation in Rice Chloroplasts. Plant Cell Physiol. 2005, 46, 858–869. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  167. Figueiredo, D.D.; Köhler, C. Signalling Events Regulating Seed Coat Development. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 2014, 42, 358–363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  168. Seymour, G.B.; Østergaard, L.; Chapman, N.H.; Knapp, S.; Martin, C. Fruit Development and Ripening. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2013, 64, 219–241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  169. Lee, K.H.; Piao, H.L.; Kim, H.-Y.; Choi, S.M.; Jiang, F.; Hartung, W.; Hwang, I.; Kwak, J.M.; Lee, I.-J.; Hwang, I. Activation of Glucosidase via Stress-Induced Polymerization Rapidly Increases Active Pools of Abscisic Acid. Cell 2006, 126, 1109–1120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  170. Ren, Y.; McGregor, C.; Zhang, Y.; Gong, G.; Zhang, H.; Guo, S.; Sun, H.; Cai, W.; Zhang, J.; Xu, Y. An Integrated Genetic Map Based on Four Mapping Populations and Quantitative Trait Loci Associated with Economically Important Traits in Watermelon (Citrullus lanatus). BMC Plant Biol. 2014, 14, 33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  171. Prothro, J.; Sandlin, K.; Abdel-Haleem, H.; Bachlava, E.; White, V.; Knapp, S.; McGregor, C. Main and Epistatic Quantitative Trait Loci Associated with Seed Size in Watermelon. J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 2012, 137, 452–457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  172. Wang, Y.; Wang, J.; Guo, S.; Tian, S.; Zhang, J.; Ren, Y.; Li, M.; Gong, G.; Zhang, H.; Xu, Y. CRISPR/Cas9-Mediated Mutagenesis of ClBG1 Decreased Seed Size and Promoted Seed Germination in Watermelon. Hortic. Res. 2021, 8, 70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  173. Li, Y.; Wu, S.; Huang, Y.; Ma, X.; Tan, L.; Liu, F.; Lv, Q.; Zhu, Z.; Hu, M.; Fu, Y.; et al. OsMADS17 Simultaneously Increases Grain Number and Grain Weight in Rice. Nat. Commun. 2023, 14, 3098. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  174. Ueguchi-Tanaka, M.; Fujisawa, Y.; Kobayashi, M.; Ashikari, M.; Iwasaki, Y.; Kitano, H.; Matsuoka, M. Rice Dwarf Mutant D1, Which Is Defective in the α Subunit of the Heterotrimeric G Protein, Affects Gibberellin Signal Transduction. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2000, 97, 11638–11643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  175. Yang, X.; Lu, J.; Shi, W.-J.; Chen, Y.-H.; Yu, J.-W.; Chen, S.-H.; Zhao, D.-S.; Huang, L.-C.; Fan, X.-L.; Zhang, C.-Q.; et al. RGA1 Regulates Grain Size, Rice Quality and Seed Germination in the Small and Round Grain Mutant Srg5. BMC Plant Biol. 2024, 24, 167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  176. He, Y.; Wang, M.; Wen, S.; Zhang, Y.; Ma, T.; Du, G. Seed Size Effect on Seedling Growth under Different Light Conditions in the Clonal Herb Ligularia Virgaurea in Qinghai-Tibet Plateau. Acta Ecol. Sin. 2007, 27, 3091–3108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  177. Herrera, L.P.; Laterra, P. Do Seed and Microsite Limitation Interact with Seed Size in Determining Invasion Patterns in Flooding Pampa Grasslands? In Herbaceous Plant Ecology; Van Der Valk, A.G., Ed.; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2008; ISBN 978-90-481-2797-9. [Google Scholar]
  178. Souza, M.L.; Fagundes, M. Seed Size as Key Factor in Germination and Seedling Development of Copaifera Langsdorffii (Fabaceae). Am. J. Plant Sci. 2014, 2014, 48412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  179. Phartyal, S.S.; Rosbakh, S.; Ritz, C.; Poschlod, P. Ready for Change: Seed Traits Contribute to the High Adaptability of Mudflat Species to Their Unpredictable Habitat. J. Veg. Sci. 2020, 31, 331–342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  180. Vaughton, G.; Ramsey, M. Sources and Consequences of Seed Mass Variation in Banksia marginata (Proteaceae). J. Ecol. 1998, 86, 563–573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  181. Gairola, S.; Mahmoud, T.; Shabana, H.A.; AlKetbi, A.; Phartyal, S.S. Effect of Seed Size on Germination in Three Species from Arid Arabian Deserts. Botany 2021, 99, 69–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  182. Fredrick, C.; Chima, U.D.; Jimmy, A.O. Effect of Seed Size on Germination and Early Seedling Growth of Dennettia tripetala (G. Baker). PAT 2020, 16, 94–103. [Google Scholar]
  183. Chacón, P.; Bustamante, R.; Henríquez, C. The Effect of Seed Size on Germination and Seedling Growth of Cryptocarya alba (Lauraceae) in Chile. Rev. Chil. De. Hist. Nat. 1998, 71, 189–197. [Google Scholar]
  184. Alam, I.; Batool, K.; Huang, Y.; Liu, J.; Ge, L. Developing Genetic Engineering Techniques for Control of Seed Size and Yield. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 13256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Mechanisms and pathways to control seed size. The figure shows the different regulators described in the review that act through maternal and/or zygotic tissues and in response to environmental stresses. All regulators have been studied in Arabidopsis unless otherwise specified. The dashed lines represent indirect interaction. Created with BioRender.com (accessed on 6 June 2024).
Figure 1. Mechanisms and pathways to control seed size. The figure shows the different regulators described in the review that act through maternal and/or zygotic tissues and in response to environmental stresses. All regulators have been studied in Arabidopsis unless otherwise specified. The dashed lines represent indirect interaction. Created with BioRender.com (accessed on 6 June 2024).
Plants 13 01793 g001
Figure 2. Length/Width ratio of seed is an agronomic trait under natural and artificial selection. (A) The two dimensions that determine the seed size. The length is the maximum of the longest axis of the seed, while the width is measured perpendicular to the length axis. (B) 10-grain of some Italian rice varieties belonging to the japonica subspecies showing different length/width ratios. Long-type grains are usually characterized by a length/width ratio bigger than 2, while round types are by a ratio lower than 2.
Figure 2. Length/Width ratio of seed is an agronomic trait under natural and artificial selection. (A) The two dimensions that determine the seed size. The length is the maximum of the longest axis of the seed, while the width is measured perpendicular to the length axis. (B) 10-grain of some Italian rice varieties belonging to the japonica subspecies showing different length/width ratios. Long-type grains are usually characterized by a length/width ratio bigger than 2, while round types are by a ratio lower than 2.
Plants 13 01793 g002
Table 1. List of the main QTLs associated with grain size in rice. The locus is referred to as the RAP-DB ID. The molecular function for the gene causative of the QTL is reported, as well as the effect on length and width, which are the two main dimensions affecting grain size. The main references reporting the QTLs characterization are cited.
Table 1. List of the main QTLs associated with grain size in rice. The locus is referred to as the RAP-DB ID. The molecular function for the gene causative of the QTL is reported, as well as the effect on length and width, which are the two main dimensions affecting grain size. The main references reporting the QTLs characterization are cited.
QTLLocusMolecular
Function
Effect on
Seed Size
References
GS3Os03g0407400G-proteinNegative on length[15,140]
GW5Os05g0187500Regulator of the
BR signaling pathway
Negative on width[141,142]
GW2Os02g0244100E3 Ubiquitin LigaseNegative on width[143]
GL6Os06g0666100Transcription factorPositive on length[135]
GL7Os07g0603300Regulator of cell cycle
(to be confirmed)
Positive on length[136]
GL3.1Os03g0646900Serine/Threonine phosphatasePositive on length[137]
GS3.1Os03g0229500MATE transporterNegative on
length and width
[138]
GW6Os06g0266800GAST family proteinPositive on width[139]
GL2Os02g0701300Transcription factorPositive on length[144]
GS10Os10g0522601Proteins with Armadillo tandem repeatsNegative on width[145]
SGW5Os02g0543400WD40 repeat-like domain-containing proteinPositive on width[146]
GSA1Os03g0757500UDP-glucosyltransferasePositive on
width and length
[127]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Boccaccini, A.; Cimini, S.; Kazmi, H.; Lepri, A.; Longo, C.; Lorrai, R.; Vittorioso, P. When Size Matters: New Insights on How Seed Size Can Contribute to the Early Stages of Plant Development. Plants 2024, 13, 1793. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants13131793

AMA Style

Boccaccini A, Cimini S, Kazmi H, Lepri A, Longo C, Lorrai R, Vittorioso P. When Size Matters: New Insights on How Seed Size Can Contribute to the Early Stages of Plant Development. Plants. 2024; 13(13):1793. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants13131793

Chicago/Turabian Style

Boccaccini, Alessandra, Sara Cimini, Hira Kazmi, Andrea Lepri, Chiara Longo, Riccardo Lorrai, and Paola Vittorioso. 2024. "When Size Matters: New Insights on How Seed Size Can Contribute to the Early Stages of Plant Development" Plants 13, no. 13: 1793. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants13131793

APA Style

Boccaccini, A., Cimini, S., Kazmi, H., Lepri, A., Longo, C., Lorrai, R., & Vittorioso, P. (2024). When Size Matters: New Insights on How Seed Size Can Contribute to the Early Stages of Plant Development. Plants, 13(13), 1793. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants13131793

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop