Next Article in Journal
Photosynthetic Performance and Yield Losses of Winter Rapeseed (Brassica napus L. var. napus) Caused by Simulated Hail
Previous Article in Journal
Identification of PgRg1-3 Gene for Ginsenoside Rg1 Biosynthesis as Revealed by Combining Genome-Wide Association Study and Gene Co-Expression Network Analysis of Jilin Ginseng Core Collection
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Plants
Volume 13
Issue 13
10.3390/plants13131782
plants-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Effects of Photoperiod and Light Quality on Germination and Growth of Camellia sinensis ‘HuangKui’

by
Gan Hu
†,
Xingchen Li
†,
Junlong Yang
,
Qingqing Yuan
,
Shijun Yang
,
Wenjun Fu
,
Xianchen Zhang
,
Yeyun Li
,
Zhougao Shen
and
Jiayue Jiang
*
State Key Laboratory of Tea Plant Biology and Utilization, Anhui Agricultural University, Hefei 230036, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Plants 2024, 13(13), 1782; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants13131782
Submission received: 5 June 2024 / Revised: 23 June 2024 / Accepted: 25 June 2024 / Published: 27 June 2024
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Light, as a critical environmental factor, plays a pivotal role in photosynthesis, ultimately influencing the timing of bud flush in tea plants. However, the synergistic effects of different photoperiods and light qualities on the timing of bud flush in the albino tea cultivar ‘HuangKui’ (later germination variety) remain unknown. Thus, the objective of this study was to investigate the effects of different photoperiods (12L/12D, 14L/10D, 16L/8D, and 18L/6D, where L = the number of daylight hours and D = the number of hours of darkness) and ratios of red (R) to blue (B) light (R/B 1:1, R/B 1:2, R/B 1:3, and R/B 2:1) on the germination and growth of the albino tea variety ‘HuangKui’. In our study, we examined how different photoperiods and red light and blue light affected tea germination and growth by investigating the timing of bud flush, photosynthesis, chlorophyll content, and growth indicators. First, our study showed that ‘HuangKui’ germinated 4 days, 2 days, and 1 day earlier under the 16L/8D photoperiod at the one bud and one leaf period compared with plants cultivated under the 12L/12D, 14L/10D, and 18L/6D photoperiods under light simulating the solar spectrum. Also, the growth of ‘HuangKui’ was maximumly promoted under the 16L/8D photoperiod treatment. Additionally, the earliest germination of ‘HuangKui’ was observed for the 16L/8D photoperiod under the R/B 2:1 (red/blue) treatment compared with the other treatments. Moreover, the greatest plant height, length of the new shoots, and new leaf areas were detected in the albino tea variety ‘HuangKui’ under R/B 2:1. Moreover, the contents of auxin (indole acetic acid, IAA) and trans-zeatin (tZ) under R/B 2:1 were significantly higher than those under the R/B 1:1 and control treatments with the 16L/8D photoperiod. Additionally, the auxin-related expression levels of CsIAA13, CsGH3.1, CsAUX1, and CsARF2 under the R/B 2:1 treatment were significantly higher than those in the control. The expression of CsARR-B, a positive regulator of cytokinin-related genes, was significantly higher under the R/B 2:1 treatment than under the control treatment, while the opposite result was found for the expression of the negative regulator CsARR-A. Therefore, the R/B 2:1 treatment with the 16L/8D photoperiod was an appropriate means of timing the bud flush for the albino tea variety ‘HuangKui’, which may be related to IAA or tZ signal transduction. In conclusion, our research offers a novel lighting strategy that promotes the germination and growth of albino tea cultivars.

1. Introduction

The tea plant (Camellia sinensis (L.) O. Kuntze), a perennial woody plant, originated in southwestern China and is now extensively grown all over the world. Its fresh leaves can be used to make popular non-alcoholic beverages [1]. As a significant economic crop, the germination time of tea plants is an important agronomic trait, directly impacting tea production and local tea economic development. ‘HuangKui’ is one of the most representative albino tea cultivars [2]. Due to its limited chloroplast development and insufficient chlorophyll accumulation, the tender shoots exhibit a golden yellow color in early spring [3]. Therefore, the amino acid and theanine contents in ‘HuangKui’ are significantly higher than those in the green variety, resulting in its unique flavor. However, ‘HuangKui’ is a late-bud break tea cultivar [4], and thus, exploring the germination-promoting mechanisms in albino tea plants is an urgent task in the tea industry.
An increasing amount of evidence has shown that the exogenous application of plant growth regulators can promote tea growth. Recently, auxin (indole acetic acid, IAA), gibberellic acid (GA3), cytokinins (CKs), and brassinolide (BL) were shown to promote the germination of tea plant shoots effectively [5,6,7,8]. Di et al. [9] reported that an exogenous supply of melatonin (MT), which upregulates leucine-rich repeat (LRR) receptor-like serine/threonine-protein kinase and transcription factors (CsMYB6, CsMYB7, CsWRKY40, and CsWRKY75), promotes the growth of tea plants. Also, Lin et al. [10] found that the germination density of spring tea (Fudingdahao variety) increased from 8.58% to 15.24% with the foliar application of silicon fertilizer in early spring. In addition, the foliar application of magnesium promotes tea plant growth by enhancing glutamine synthetase-mediated nitrogen assimilation [11].
Additionally, the molecular biological approach for germination research in tea plants has achieved definite progress. CsARP1, CsGLP1, CsARF1, CsPIN3, CsAUX1, and CsPILS2 have all been found to be closely related to dormancy lifting and tea shoot germination in tea plants [12]. Combined with quantitative trait loci (QTL) mapping, Tan et al. [13] found that two major QTLs (qSPI3 and qSPI4) play an important role in the spring germination of tea plants. Seven genes (three uncharacterized protein genes, two peroxidase genes, one uridine S’-monophosphate synthase gene, and one calmodulin-binding protein gene) affecting the timing of bud flush in tea plants were identified [14].
However, the above methods are time-consuming and have a low efficiency. Thus, it is very important to adopt appropriate measures to promote spring bud flush. With the continuous progress of technology, a novel lighting technology, LEDs (light-emitting diodes), with high efficiency, stability, and controllability, has been widely used in crop sprouting. For example, 50 μmol m−2 s−1 with a 12 h d−1 photoperiod is an optimal light condition for the shoot growth of ginseng (Panax ginseng) [15]. Chen et al. [16] reported that greater sprout length was observed under 16-h red and blue light conditions. In addition, higher levels of fresh weight, shoot height, and root length were detected in Snapdragon (Antirrhinum majus L.) under 50% blue and 50% red treatment compared with natural daylight treatment [17]. Similar results showed that the greatest leaf area and germination rate in arugula (Eruca vesicaria ssp. Sativa) were detected under a 24-h photoperiod with blue–red–far-red lighting [18]. The above experiments confirmed that the appropriate combination of LEDs can significantly enhance plant germination rates. However, the effect of red and blue light on germination in tea plants remains unknown.
In this study, different photoperiods and light qualities were provided to examine the germination and growth of ‘HuangKui’ (an albino tea variety). In addition, the contents and expression levels of hormone-related genes were detected to explore the underlying mechanism.

2. Results

2.1. Tea Plant’s Phenological Periods and Growth

As shown in Figure 1, the best growth of tea plants was observed under the 16L/8D treatment (in all cases, the number refers to the number of hours, and L and D represent daylight hours and hours of darkness, respectively). The leaves of ‘HuangKui’ began to sprout at 8 days under the 16L/8D and 18L/6D treatments, while the leaves sprouted at 9 or 10 days under the 14L/10D and 12L/12D treatments. Additionally, the number of days until the appearance of one bud and one leaf, one bud and two leaves, and one bud and three leaves are shown in Table 1.

2.2. Leaf Photosynthetic Performance under Different Photoperiod Treatments

To further illustrate the effect of different photoperiod treatments on the growth of tea plants, the photosynthetic parameters were measured on the fully expanded second leaves of each treatment. Consistent with the above results, the highest levels of stomatal conductance (Figure 2A) and intercellular CO2 concentration (Figure 2B) were detected under the 16L/8D treatment. The photosynthesis of ‘HuangKui’ was significantly higher by 20.73% under the 16L/8D treatment compared with that under the 12L/12D treatment (Figure 2C). Also, similar results were found for the transpiration rate (Figure 2D).

2.3. Leaf Chlorophyll Content under Different Photoperiod Treatments

The chlorophyll level is an important component related to photosynthesis in plants. As shown in Table 2, the highest contents of chlorophyll A and chlorophyll B were detected under the 16L/8D photoperiod, being significantly higher than those under the 12L/12D and 14L/10D photoperiods.

2.4. Growth of Tea Plants under Different Photoperiod Treatments

To further compare the growth difference under different light treatments, the new leaf area, new shoot length, length of the internode, and the number of newly expanded leaves were analyzed. The greatest new leaf area (Figure 3A), new shoot length (Figure 3B), and number of newly expanded leaves (Figure 3D) were observed under the 16L/8D treatment. However, no significant difference was found in the length of the internode under different light treatments (Figure 3C).

2.5. Tea Plant’s Phenological Periods under Different Light Quality Treatments

The above results indicate that a 16L/8D photoperiod is a suitable treatment for the growth of ‘HuangKui’. To further explore the effect of different light qualities on tea growth under the 16L/8D photoperiod, the different lighting equipment is presented, and the ratios of red and blue light are shown in Figure 4. Significant differences in the growth of ‘HuangKui’ were found under different light-quality treatments.
As shown in Figure 5, the R/B 2:1 treatment maximally promoted the growth of the tea plants. Additionally, the impact of different light quality treatments on the number of days of the tea plants’ phenological periods was investigated. ‘HuangKui’ germinated 3 days earlier under the R/B 2:1 treatment compared with the control. In contrast, the R/B 1:1 treatment impaired the growth of tea leaves, and similar results were found regarding the number of days until the appearance of one bud and one leaf, one bud and two leaves, and one bud and three leaves (Table 3).

2.6. Leaf Photosynthetic Performance under Different Light Quality Treatments

To further illustrate the effect of different light-quality treatments on the growth of the tea plants, the photosynthetic parameters were measured on the fully expanded second leaves of each treatment. Consistent with the above results, the highest level of stomatal conductance (Figure 6A) was detected under the R/B 2:1 treatment. Thus, the photosynthesis of ‘HuangKui’ was significantly higher by 57.28% under the R/B 2:1 treatment compared with the control (Figure 6C). Also, similar results were found in the intercellular CO2 concentration (Figure 6B) and transpiration rate (Figure 6D).

2.7. Growth of Tea Plants under Different Light Quality Treatments

Similarly, to further compare the growth difference under different light quality treatments, the new leaf area, new shoot length, length of the internode, and number of newly expanded leaves were measured. The highest new leaf area (Figure 7A), new shoot length (Figure 7B), and length of the internode (Figure 7C) were detected under the R/B 2:1 treatment compared with the control treatment, being significantly higher by 19.38%, 29.87%, and 25.50%, respectively. However, no significant difference was found in the number of newly expanded leaves under the different light-quality treatments (Figure 7D). Additionally, the R/B 1:1 treatment significantly impaired tea plant growth, and the new shoot length was significantly lower by 10.41%.

2.8. Tea Plant Quality under Different Light Quality Treatments

The above results indicate that R/B 2:1 is a suitable light-quality treatment for the germination and growth of ‘HuangKui’. To further investigate the effects of different light-quality treatments on tea quality, the tea polyphenol content, total free amino acid content, and caffeine content were analyzed using the first leaf from the top (Figure 8).
Among the different treatments, the R/B 2:1 treatment resulted in the highest level of tea polyphenols for ‘HuangKui’ (Figure 8A). Also, the levels of C (87.50%), EGCG (5.24%), GCG (105.52%), ECG (25.70%), and TC (5.83%) significantly increased under the R/B 2:1 treatment compared with those in the control treatment (Table 4). In addition, a higher ratio of blue light (R/B 1:2 and R/B 1:3) significantly increased the content of free amino acids by 5.45% and 13.12%, and no significant difference was found in the total free amino acid content under the R/B 2:1 treatment compared with the control. However, ‘HuangKui’ tea leaves under the R/B 1:1 treatment exhibited the lowest level of total free amino acids (Figure 8B). Moreover, compared with the control treatment, the contents of caffeine under the R/B 1:1 and R/B 1:3 treatments significantly increased by 8.60% and 11.52%, respectively. However, the R/B 1:2 and R/B 2:1 treatments exhibited a decrease in the caffeine content compared with the control treatment (Figure 8C).

2.9. The Hormone Content and Gene Expression Levels under Different Light Qualities

As mentioned in the introduction, auxin and cytokinin play an important role in plant growth. Thus, the auxin (IAA) and trans-zeatin (tZ) contents in ‘HuangKui’ under different light quality treatments were detected. The results indicate that tea plants with earlier germination (R/B 2:1) exhibited higher contents of IAA and tZ (Figure 9A). However, lower accumulation levels of IAA and tZ were detected in tea plants that germinated later (R/B 1:1) (Figure 9B).
To further clarify the promotion mechanism, the expression level of the auxin- and cytokinin-related genes in the first leaf from the top was analyzed via qRT-PCR.
The results show that the auxin-related gene expression levels of CsIAA13, CsGH3.1, CsAUX1, and CsARF2 in the R/B 2:1 treatment were significantly higher than those in the control (Figure 9C–F). In addition, a significantly lower expression level of CsARR-A (negative regulator) was detected under the R/B 2:1 treatment than the control, while the opposite result was found for CsARR-B (positive regulator) (Figure 9G,H).

3. Discussion

The timing of bud flush is one of the most important agronomic traits of tea plants. Tea cultivars with an early timing of bud flush are highly valued for economic development. However, under natural conditions, the late timing of bud flush in the albino tea plant cultivar ‘HuangKui’ limits this tea’s economic value. Light serves as the energy source for plant photosynthesis, influencing plant growth and development. Plants perceive different wavelengths of light through various photoreceptors that respond to different regions of the absorption spectrum [19], playing an important role in the timing of bud flush of various plants [20,21].
The results of our study reveal that the appropriate condition to promote the bud flush of ‘HuangKui’ was the 16L/8D photoperiod (Table 1). Similar results reported that a 16L/8D photoperiod promoted earlier budburst in two co-occurring Mediterranean oaks (Quercus ilex L. subsp. Ballota and Q. faginea Lam.) [22]. Generally, a longer photoperiod contributes to an increase in light capture and canopy photosynthesis, thus increasing the chlorophyll content and germination [23]. However, excessively long photoperiods can cause an overabundance of light energy, which disrupts the photosynthetic chloroplasts, thereby adversely affecting plant growth and development [24]. Therefore, in our study, a lower total chlorophyll content was detected under the 18L/6D treatment compared with the 16L/8D treatment (Table 2). It may be that the longer photoperiods led to excess light energy, which impeded photosynthetic chloroplast metabolism and tea plant growth. Also, Šrajer Gajdošik reported that the most favorable growth conditions for industrial hemp (Cannabis sativa L. subsp. sativa) were observed under a 16L/8D photoperiod compared with those under a 20L/4D photoperiod [25]. Additionally, another previous study reported that excessively long photoperiods lead to the appearance and development of photo-oxidation or photodamage [26]. Therefore, our results imply that a 16L/8D photoperiod is an appropriate means of timing bud flush for the albino tea variety ‘HuangKui’, while the longer photoperiod (18L/6D) hindered chlorophyll biosynthesis and photosynthetic ability.
The blue light band (400–500 nm) and red light band (600–700 nm) are important components associated with the sunlight spectrum, playing a primary role in plant growth and development [27]. It is well known that red light wavelengths perfectly fit the absorption peak of chlorophylls and phytochromes, and thus, a high ratio of red light promotes plant growth [28]. In our study, a high ratio of red light (R/B = 2:1) significantly promoted tea plant growth compared with low ratios of red light (R/B = 1:1, 1:2, and 1:3). Similar results reported that a ratio of red/blue light of 2:1 was the most suitable light source for the growth of Haematococcus pluvialis, producing a higher biomass and photosynthetic pigment content than a red/blue light 1:2 treatment [29]. Also, the maximum growth rate of duckweed (Lemna minor L.) (11.37 g/m2/day) was observed at a red/blue ratio of 2:1 compared with a red/blue ratio of 1:4 [30]. Consistent with the above results, our results show that a ratio of red/blue light of 2:1 significantly promoted tea plant growth under a 16L/8D photoperiod (Table 3).
As mentioned above, the R/B 2:1 treatment significantly promoted the growth of tea plants under a 16L/8D photoperiod [31]. Plants perceive light signals via multiple sensory photoreceptors. Additionally, light signaling coordinates with plant hormones such as auxins and cytokinins in regulating plant germination and growth [32,33]. As is well known, auxin is one of the plant hormones associated with cell elongation. The auxin family candidates GH3, Aux/IAA, and SAUR play a significant role in plant growth [34,35]. In addition, cytokinins are widely recognized as key regulators in promoting germination [36].
Therefore, to further reveal the promotion mechanism, the related plant hormone contents of leaves were detected (Figure 9A,B). Our results show that ‘HuangKui’ under the R/B 2:1 treatment exhibited a higher content of auxin (IAA) compared with those under the R/B 1:1 and control treatments under the 16L/8D photoperiod (Figure 9A). To further establish a correlation between the levels of transcripts of the studied genes and IAA level, GH3.1 [37,38], IAA13 [39], ARF2 [40], and AUX1 [41], which affect IAA signaling pathways, were analyzed. Our results show that higher auxin-related gene expression levels of CsGH3.1, CsIAA13, CsARF2, and CsAUX1 were detected under R/B 2:1 with earlier germination (Figure 9C–F). Previous studies also reported the role of auxin-related genes in IAA synthesis and plant growth. For example, the addition of 0.05 μM 1-naphthylacetic acid to a medium of Rhododendron cells significantly increased the expression level of DUHoIAA13, resulting in a higher IAA content, thereby effectively completing the regeneration of buds from leaves in vitro [42]. Also, SlARF2-overexpressing tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) displayed significantly increased IAA contents, which enhanced tomato lateral root formation [43]. Additionally, the overexpression of OsAUX1 in rice led to an increase in the IAA content, resulting in an increased rate of lateral root initiation in rice plants in response to local nitrate supply [44]. Consistent with the above study, our study indicated that a higher ratio of red light (R/B 2:1) induced a higher expression level of auxin-related genes (CsGH3.1, CsIAA13, CsARF2, and CsAUX1) and significantly increased the IAA content, thus promoting the germination of tea plants.
Moreover, cytokinins are widely recognized as key regulators in promoting germination [36]. Two response regulators (ARR-A and ARR-B) are involved in cytokinin signal transduction, and they play opposite roles in the germination of plant buds [45]. In our study, the highest trans-zeatin (tZ) content was found under the R/B 2:1 treatment (Figure 9B), and the cytokinin-related gene expression level of CsARR-B under R/B 2:1 was significantly higher than that in the control (Figure 9H). In Arabidopsis, ARR-B positively promotes bud regeneration by directly activating WUS expression [46]. In addition, BcARR-B positively regulated cytokinin synthesis in cabbage (Brassica campestris L.) [47]. In contrast, the lowest cytokinin-related gene expression level of CsARR-A was found under the R/B 2:1 treatment (Figure 9G). The overexpression of AtARR-A in Arabidopsis decreased the trans-zeatin (tZ) content and resulted in a significant reduction in hypocotyl elongation [48]. Therefore, in our study, the higher expression level of ARR-B and the lower expression level of ARR-A regulated cytokinin synthesis, thus promoting the germination and growth of ‘HuangKui’.
Therefore, our results show that R/B 2:1 under a 16L/8D photoperiod is an appropriate means of timing the bud flush for the albino tea variety ‘HuangKui’, which may be due to the specific plant hormone signal transduction. However, the interaction between hormones and their specific molecular mechanisms still needs to be further investigated.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Plant Material and Experimental Settings

The plants of the albino tea variety ‘HuangKui’ (2-year-old seedlings) were obtained from Langxi County, Xuancheng City, Anhui Province, China. The tea plants were carefully washed and planted in a plastic pot with a radius of 4 cm and a height of 10 cm that was filled with peat, perlite, and vermiculite (2:1:1). Then, the tea plants were transferred to an artificial climate chamber (Anhui Agricultural University, located at 31°520′ N 117°150′ E). The conditions were as follows: a temperature of around 25 °C and a humidity between 70% and 75%. The tea plants were grown for 12 days before the light treatments were imposed. The LEDs were equipped with light plates (Hangzhou Linan Jiayu Technology Co., Ltd., Hangzhou, China). The photosynthetic photon flux density (PPFD) in the climate chamber was set to 200 μmol·m−2 s−1 irradiance for all plants.
The light treatments with different photoperiods included 12L/12D, 14L/10D, 16L/8D, and 18L/6D, and the different light treatments were simulated from the solar spectrum. The light treatments with different red/blue (R/B) light ratios included R/B 1:1, R/B 1:2, R/B 1:3, and R/B 2:1. The light distribution was recorded using a SPIC-300AW (Hangzhou Yuanfang Optoelectronic Information Co., Ltd., Hangzhou, China) spectrometer, as shown in Table 5.

4.2. Determination of Phenological Period Timing

The timing of the budburst, one bud and one leaf, one bud and two leaves, and one bud and three leaves, was assessed visually. These visual assessments were performed using the method described by Yi et al. [49]. This method is recognized for the identification of phenological periods in tea plants.

4.3. Determination of Photosynthetic Characteristics

The photosynthetic parameters of fully expanded second leaves from twelve plants in each treatment group were recorded using a portable photosynthesizer (CIRAS-3, PP Inc., Amesbury, MA, USA), as described in Yang et al. [50]. During the measurements, the light intensity was maintained at a constant level of 200 μmol m−2 s−1, the temperature was strictly controlled within the range of 25 ± 1 °C, and the CO2 concentration was strictly controlled at 400 ± 10 μmol mol−1.

4.4. Chlorophyll Concentration

The first and second leaves of tea plants were collected. The leaves were weighed and ground with 10 milliliters of 80% acetone. The liquid supernatants were filtered, and the samples were centrifuged at 4000× g for 10 min. The concentrations of chlorophyll a (Chl a) and chlorophyll b (Chl b) were measured using a spectrophotometer at 663 nm (OD (optical density)663) and 646 nm (OD646). The contents of chlorophyll a and b were calculated using the following formulas:
CChl.a (mg g−1 FW) = (12.21 × OD663 − 2.81 × OD646)/(1000 × FW) × V
CChl.b (mg g−1 FW) = (20.13 × OD646 − 5.03 × OD663)/(1000 × FW) × V
where V and FW indicate the volume of the reaction system and the weight of the isolated tea leaves, respectively [51].

4.5. Determination of Tea Plant Growth

For the growth analysis, the growth indicators were measured once new buds had ceased to sprout (n = 12). The lengths of new shoots and internodes were accurately measured by using a vernier caliper (DL91150, Delix Group, Ninghai County, Ningbo City, China), and the area of the leaves was measured by using a specialized area meter (AM-350, ADC Bioscience UK Ltd., Oxfordshire, UK).

4.6. Tea Polyphenols, Free Amino Acids, and Caffeine

The concentrations of tea polyphenols, free amino acids, caffeine, and catechin components were determined in fresh leaves (second leaves) collected from tea plants. Tea polyphenols were determined using an ultraviolet (UV) spectrophotometer (UV T5, Shanghai, China) at 765 nm, followed by the Folin–Ciocalteu method [52]. The determination of free amino acids was based on the ninhydrin coloration staining method [53]. In addition, the extraction and detection methods of catechins were based on high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) analysis following the protocol by Ye et al. [54].

4.7. Hormone Determination

Hormone extraction and analysis were conducted as described by Kijidani et al. [55] and Zeng et al. [56]. Briefly, hormones were extracted from 300 mg of powdered tea leaves (fresh weight) and transferred to 15 mL screw-cap tubes. Then, 3000 μL of a 2-propanol/water/concentrated HCl solution (2:1:0.002, v/v) was initially added as the solvent. Subsequently, the samples were agitated in a shaker at 4 °C for 30 min. Then, 6000 μL of dichloromethane was added, and the mixture was agitated further for 30 min at 4 °C. Centrifugation at 4000 r/min for 10 min resulted in the formation of two distinct layers, with plant debris positioned at the interface. The lower layer (1 mL) was concentrated with a nitrogen evaporator for 1 h, redissolved in 1 mL of methyl alcohol, vortexed, centrifuged at 4000 r/min for 10 min at 4 °C, and analyzed by liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry (LC/MS).
IAA (97% content) and tZ (98% content) as internal standards, and plant hormone standard solutions were prepared in methanol/water/formic acid (50:50:0.1%, v/v). For IAA analysis, an ACQUITY UPLC BEH C18 column (2.1 mm × 100 mm, 1.7 μm, Waters, Milford, MA, USA) was used with a mobile phase of acetonitrile and distilled water, both containing 0.1% (v/v) formic acid, at a flow rate of 0.3 mL/min. In addition, for tZ analysis, a CORTECS UPLC T3 column (2.1 mm × 100 mm, 1.6 μm, Waters, Milford, MA, USA) was used with a mobile phase consisting of methanol and distilled water, both containing 0.1% (v/v) formic acid, at a flow rate of 0.3 mL/min. Quantitative analyses were performed based on the calibration curves of the standards.

4.8. Primer Design and Quantitative Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) (qRT-PCR)

qRT–PCR and RNA extraction were performed following the method presented by Wang et al. [57]. In our experiments, CsGAPDH was selected as a reference control, and primers for the validated genes were designed using Primer 3 Plus. Relative expression levels were calculated using the 2−ΔΔCt method [58]. All of the primers used in this study are shown in Table S1.

4.9. Statistical Analysis

All measurements of different replicate samples were analyzed. All data analyses were performed using SPSS 26.0 software. Data are presented as the mean ± standard deviation (SD). The statistical analysis included a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), and statistical significance was calculated using Duncan’s multiple range test at a significance level of p < 0.05.

5. Conclusions

In this study, we found that the R/B 2:1 treatment under a 16L/8D photoperiod was an appropriate mode for promoting the germination and growth of the albino tea cultivar ‘HuangKui’.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/plants13131782/s1, Table S1: Primers used in this study.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, J.J., X.Z., Y.L. and Z.S.; methodology, G.H.; software, X.L. and J.Y.; validation, J.J.; formal analysis, W.F., S.Y. and Q.Y.; resources, J.J. and G.H.; writing—original draft preparation, J.J. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Key Research and Development Project (2021YFD1601100), Anhui Universities Research Project (2023AH050987), Anhui Province Science and Technology Major Project (201903a06020016, 202203a06020014). In addition, this work was also supported by the “Langxi Etiolated Tea + Finance + Technology” Pilot Project.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author. The data are not publicly available due to privacy.

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to XianChen Zhang (Anhui Agricultural University), who helped us polish our manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Chang, N.; Zhou, Z.; Li, Y.; Zhang, X. Exogenously applied Spd and Spm enhance drought tolerance in tea plants by increasing fatty acid desaturation and plasma membrane H+-ATPase activity. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2022, 170, 225–233. [Google Scholar]
  2. Liu, X.; Cheng, X.; Cao, J.; Zhu, W.; Sun, Y.; Lin, N.; Wan, X.; Liu, L. UV-B regulates seasonal greening of albino leaves by modulating CsHY5-inhibiting chlorophyll biosynthesis in Camellia sinensis cv. Huangkui. Plant Sci. 2023, 328, 111569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Liu, X.; Cao, J.; Cheng, X.; Zhu, W.; Sun, Y.; Wan, X.; Liu, L. CsRVE1 promotes seasonal greening of albino Camellia sinensis cv. Huangkui by activating chlorophyll biosynthesis. Tree Physiol. 2023, 43, 1432–1443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Hao, G.; Zheng, Z.; Ma, H.; Ye, Y.; Guo, M.; Cheng, H.; Rua, L. New albino tea variety-Zhongbai 4. China Tea 2019, 41, 11–13. [Google Scholar]
  5. Li, W.; Xiang, F.; Su, Y.; Luo, Z.; Luo, W.; Zhou, L.; Liu, H.; Xiao, L. Gibberellin Increases the Bud Yield and Theanine Accumulation in Camellia sinensis (L.) Kuntze. Molecules 2021, 26, 3290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Chen, J.; Wu, S.; Mao, K.; Li, J.; Dong, F.; Tang, J.; Zeng, L.; Gu, D. Adverse effects of shading on the tea yield and the restorative effects of exogenously applied brassinolide. Ind. Crops Prod. 2023, 197, 116546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Thirugnanasambantham, K.; Prabu, G.; Mandal, A.K.A. Synergistic effect of cytokinin and gibberellins stimulates release of dormancy in tea (Camellia sinensis (L.) O. Kuntze) bud. Physiol. Mol. Biol. Plants 2020, 26, 1035–1045. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Li, C.; Wang, H.; Chen, Y.; Li, Y.; Wang, X.; Yue, C. Study on the Regulation Roles of Plant Hormones on the Growth and Development of Tea Shoots inSpring. J. Tea Sci. 2023, 43, 335–348. [Google Scholar]
  9. Di, T.; Zhao, L.; Chen, H.; Qian, W.; Wang, P.; Zhang, X.; Xia, T. Transcriptomic and Metabolic Insights into the Distinctive Effects of Exogenous Melatonin and Gibberellin on Terpenoid Synthesis and Plant Hormone Signal Transduction Pathway in Camellia sinensis. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2019, 67, 4689–4699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Lin, S.; Lin, Y.; Jiang, S.; Liu, W.; Xie, J. Effects of Foliar Application of Silicon Fertilizer on Yield and Quality of White Tea. China Tea 2021, 43, 52–55. [Google Scholar]
  11. Zhang, Q.; Shi, Y.; Hu, H.; Shi, Y.; Tang, D.; Ruan, J.; Fernie, A.; Liu, M. Magnesium promotes tea plant growth via enhanced glutamine synthetase-mediated nitrogen assimilation. Plant Physiol. 2023, 192, 1321–1337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Wang, L.; Wu, L.; Wei, K.; Wang, L. Tea plant timing of spring bud flush QTL candidate genes. J. Tea Sci. 2023, 6, 10. [Google Scholar]
  13. Tan, L.; Cui, D.; Wang, L.; Liu, Q.; Zhang, D.; Hu, X.; Fu, Y.; Chen, S.; Zou, Y.; Chen, W.; et al. Genetic analysis of the early bud flush trait of tea plants (Camellia sinensis) in the cultivar ‘Emei Wenchun’ and its open-pollinated offspring. Hortic. Res. 2022, 9, 086. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Wang, R.; Gao, X.; Yang, J.; Kong, X. Genome-Wide Association Study to Identify Favorable SNP Allelic Variations and Candidate Genes That Control the Timing of Spring Bud Flush of Tea (Camellia sinensis) Using SLAF-seq. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2019, 67, 10380–10391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Lee, B.; Pham, M.; Cui, M.; Lee, H.; Hwang, H.; Jang, I.; Chun, C. Growth and physiological responses of Panax ginseng seedlings as affected by light intensity and photoperiod. Hortic. Environ. Biotechnol. 2022, 63, 835–846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Chen, J.; Chen, Z.; Li, Z.; Zhao, Y.; Chen, X.; Guo, R. Effect of Photoperiod on Chinese Kale (Brassica alboglabra) Sprouts Under White or Combined Red and Blue Light. Front. Plant Sci. 2021, 11, 589746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Nabipour, S.; Hir, P.; Chamani, E.; Estaji, A. LED Lighting Influences Germination, Growth, and Biochemical Indices of Snapdragon. Russ. J. Plant Physiol. 2023, 70, 121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Vatistas, C.; Avgoustaki, D.D.; Monedas, G.; Bartzanas, T. The effect of different light wavelengths on the germination of lettuce, cabbage, spinach and arugula seeds in a controlled environment chamber. Sci. Hortic. 2024, 331, 113118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Paik, I.; Huq, E. Plant photoreceptors: Multi-functional sensory proteins and their signaling networks. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 2019, 92, 114–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Zhang, F.; Cheng, G.; Shu, X.; Wang, N.; Wang, Z. Transcriptome Analysis of Lycoris chinensis Bulbs Reveals Flowering in the Age-Mediated Pathway. Biomolecules 2022, 12, 899. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Varinder, S.; Valérie, B.; Marianne, L.; Valérie, G. Effect of light quality and extended photoperiod on flower bud induction during transplant production of day-neutral strawberry cultivars. Can. J. Plant Sci. 2022, 102, 356–367. [Google Scholar]
  22. Pérez, V.; Castro, P.; Valladares, F. Differential and interactive effects of temperature and photoperiod on budburst and carbon reserves in two co-occurring Mediterranean oaks. Plant Biol. 2009, 11, 142–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Elkins, C.; van Iersel, M.W. Longer Photoperiods with the Same Daily Light Integral Improve Growth of Rudbeckia Seedlings in a Greenhouse. HortScience 2020, 55, 1676–1682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Chu, Q.; Qin, Y.; Li, C.; Cheng, S.; Su, L.; He, Z.; Zhou, X.; Shao, D.; Guo, X. Effects of Different Photoperiods on the Growth and Nutritional Characteristics of Two Celery Cultivars in Plant Factory. Agronomy 2023, 13, 3039. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Šrajer Gajdošik, M.; Vicić, A.; Gvozdić, V.; Galić, V.; Begović, L.; Mlinarić, S. Effect of Prolonged Photoperiod on Light-Dependent Photosynthetic Reactions in Cannabis. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 9702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Shibaeva, T.G.; Mamaev, A.V.; Titov, A.F. Possible Physiological Mechanisms of Leaf Photodamage in Plants Grown under Continuous Lighting. Russ. J. Plant Physiol. 2023, 70, 15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Peng, Y.; Fan, M.; Wang, Q.; Lan, W.; Long, Y. Best hyperspectral indices for assessing leaf chlorophyll content in a degraded temperate vegetation. Ecol. Evol. 2018, 8, 7068–7078. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Haijie, D.; Genhua, N.; Mengmeng, G.; Joseph, M.J.H. Effects of Light Quality on Growth and Phytonutrient Accumulation of Herbs under Controlled Environments. Horticulturae 2017, 3, 36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Li, K.; Ye, Q.; Li, Q.; Xia, R.; Guo, W.; Cheng, J. Effects of the spatial and spectral distribution of red and blue light on Haematococcus pluvialis growth. Algal Res. 2020, 51, 102045. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Li, Q.; Yi, Z.; Yang, G.; Xu, Y.; Jin, Y.; Tan, L.; Du, A.; He, K.; Zhao, H.; Fang, Y. Effects of various spectral compositions on micro-polluted water purification and biofuel feedstock production using duckweed. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2022, 29, 52003–52012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Chowdhury, M.; Gulandaz, A.; Islam, S.; Reza, N.; Ali, M.; Islam, N.; Park, S.; Chung, S. Lighting conditions affect the growth and glucosinolate contents of Chinese kale leaves grown in an aeroponic plant factory. Hortic. Environ. Biotechnol. 2023, 64, 97–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Lv, B.; Zhu, J.; Kong, X.; Ding, Z. Light participates in the auxin-dependent regulation of plant growth. J. Integr. Plant Biol. 2021, 63, 819–822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Roman, H.; Girault, T.; Barbier, F.; Péron, T.; Brouard, N.; Pěnčík, A.; Novák, O.; Vian, A.; Sakr, S.; Lothier, J.; et al. Cytokinins Are Initial Targets of Light in the Control of Bud Outgrowth. Plant Physiol. 2016, 172, 489–509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Swarup, R.; Bhosale, R. Developmental Roles of AUX1/LAX Auxin Influx Carriers in Plants. Front. Plant Sci. 2019, 10, 1306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Cheng, Y.; Cheng, L.; Hu, G.; Guo, X.; Lan, Y. Auxin and CmAP1 regulate the reproductive development of axillary buds in Chinese chestnut (Castanea mollissima). Plant Cell Rep. 2023, 42, 287–296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Liu, J.; Sherif, M.S. Hormonal Orchestration of Bud Dormancy Cycle in Deciduous Woody Perennials. Front. Plant Sci. 2019, 10, 01136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Hao, X.; Tang, H.; Wang, B.; Wang, L.; Cao, H.; Wang, Y.; Zeng, J.; Fang, S.; Chu, J.; Yang, Y.; et al. Gene Characterization and Expression Analysis Reveal the Importance of Auxin Signaling in Bud Dormancy Regulation in Tea Plant. J. Plant Growth Regul. 2019, 38, 225–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Wang, X.; Jia, C.; An, L.; Zeng, J.; Ren, A.; Han, X.; Wang, Y.; Wu, S. Genome-wide identification and expression characterization of the GH3 gene family of tea plant (Camellia sinensis). BMC Genom. 2024, 25, 120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Zhu, H.; Li, H.; Yu, J.; Zhao, H.; Zhang, K.; Ge, W. Regulatory Mechanisms of ArAux/IAA13 and ArAux/IAA16 in the Rooting Process of Acer rubrum. Genes 2023, 14, 1206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Vert, G.; Walcher, C.; Chory, J.; Nemhauser, J. Integration of auxin and brassinosteroid pathways by Auxin Response Factor 2. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2008, 105, 9829–9834. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Yang, L.; Zhang, K.; Li, L. Identification and Expression Analysis of AUX1/LAX Gene Family in Moso Bamboo (Phyllostachys edulis). J. Northwest For. Univ. 2022, 37, 89–95. [Google Scholar]
  42. Peng, L.; Li, H.; Song, J.; Xie, W.; Zhang, L.; Li, S.; Cai, Y.; Zhao, Z. Morphological and transcriptome analyses reveal mechanism for efficient regeneration of adventitious buds from in vitro leaves of Rhododendron delavayi regulated by exogenous TDZ. In Vitro Cell. Dev. Biol. Plant 2022, 58, 1025–1037. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Ren, Z.; Liu, R.; Gu, W.; Dong, X. The Solanum lycopersicum auxin response factor SlARF2 participates in regulating lateral root formation and flower organ senescence. Plant Sci. Int. J. Exp. Plant Biol. 2017, 256, 103–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Song, W.; Sun, H.; Li, J.; Gong, X.; Huang, S.; Zhu, X.; Zhang, Y.; Xu, G. Auxin distribution is differentially affected by nitrate in roots of two rice cultivars differing in responsiveness to nitrogen. Ann. Bot. 2013, 112, 1383–1393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Li, S.; Zheng, H.; Zhang, X.; Sui, N. Cytokinins as central regulators during plant growth and stress response. Plant Cell Rep. 2021, 40, 271–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Liu, Z.; Dai, X.; Li, J.; Liu, N.; Liu, X.; Li, S.; Xiang, F. The Type-B Cytokinin Response Regulator ARR1 Inhibits Shoot Regeneration in an ARR12-Dependent Manner in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 2020, 32, 2271–2291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Ou, X.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, J.; Xie, Z.; He, B.; Jiang, Z.; Wang, Y.; Su, W.; Song, S.; Hao, Y.; et al. Identification of BcARR Genes and CTK Effects on Stalk Development of Flowering Chinese Cabbage. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 7412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. To, J.P.; Haberer, G.; Ferreira, F.J.; Deruère, J.; Mason, M.G.; Schaller, G.E.; Alonso, J.M.; Ecker, J.R.; Kieber, J.J. Type-A Arabidopsis response regulators are partially redundant negative regulators of cytokinin signaling. Plant Cell 2004, 16, 658–671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Yi, X.; Zhao, Y.; Huang, C.; Wang, H. Phenological Observation and Meteorological Conditions Analysis during 2019 Spring Tea growth in Nanjian. Agric. Technol. Equip. 2019, 4, 37–38+40. [Google Scholar]
  50. Yang, N.; Han, M.; Teng, R.; Yang, Y.; Wang, Y.; Xiong, A.; Zhuang, J. Exogenous Melatonin Enhances Photosynthetic Capacity and Related Gene Expression in A Dose-Dependent Manner in the Tea Plant (Camellia sinensis (L.) Kuntze). Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 6694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Tian, Y.; Wang, H.; Sun, P.; Fan, Y.; Qiao, M.; Zhang, L.; Zhang, Z. Response of leaf color and the expression of photoreceptor genes of Camellia sinensis cv. Huangjinya to different light quality conditions. Sci. Hortic. 2019, 251, 225–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Sun, M.; Jiang, C.; Kong, Y.; Luo, J.; Yin, P.; Guo, G. Recent Advances in Analytical Methods for Determination of Polyphenols in Tea: A Comprehensive Review. Foods 2022, 11, 1425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Zhang, X.; Chen, K.; Zhao, Z.; Li, S.; Li, Y. A Novel LED Light Radiation Approach Enhances Growth in Green and Albino Tea Varieties. Plants 2023, 12, 988. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Ye, J.; Wang, Y.; Wang, Y.; Hong, L.; Jia, X.; Kang, J.; Lin, S.; Wu, Z.; Wang, H. Improvement of soil acidification in tea plantations by long-term use of organic fertilizers and its effect on tea yield and quality. Front. Plant Sci. 2022, 13, 1055900. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Kijidani, Y.; Tsuyama, T.; Tokumoto, Y. Distribution of Plant Hormones and Their Precursors in Cambial Region Tissues of Quercus myrsinifolia and Castanopsis cuspidata var. sieboldii after Bending Stems or Applying Ethylene precursor. Forests 2023, 14, 813. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Zeng, L.; Wang, X.; Liao, Y.; Gu, D.; Dong, F.; Yang, Z. Formation of and changes in phytohormone levels in response to stress during the manufacturing process of oolong tea (Camellia sinensis). Postharvest Biol. Technol. 2019, 157, 110974. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Wang, P.; Zheng, Y.; Guo, Y.; Chen, X.; Sun, Y.; Yang, J.; Ye, N. Identification, expression, and putative target gene analysis of nuclear factor-Y (NF-Y) transcription factors in tea plant (Camellia sinensis). Planta 2019, 250, 1671–1686. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Pi, X.; Chang, N.; Zhou, Z.; Li, Y.; Zhang, X. CsFAD2 and CsFAD5 are key genes for C18:2 fatty acid pathway-mediated cold tolerance in tea (Camellia sinensis). Environ. Exp. Bot. 2023, 210, 105317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Plants 13 01782 g001
Figure 1. The effect of different photoperiod treatments on the growth of tea plants.
Figure 1. The effect of different photoperiod treatments on the growth of tea plants.
Plants 13 01782 g001
Plants 13 01782 g002
Figure 2. Effect of different photoperiod treatments on photosynthetic parameters of ‘Huangkui’. Effect of different photoperiod treatments on stomatal conductance (A), intercellular CO2 concentration (B), net photosynthetic rate (C), and transpiration rate (D) of ‘Huangkui’; Note: Different lowercase letters on the top of the bar chart indicate significant differences at the level of p < 0.05.
Figure 2. Effect of different photoperiod treatments on photosynthetic parameters of ‘Huangkui’. Effect of different photoperiod treatments on stomatal conductance (A), intercellular CO2 concentration (B), net photosynthetic rate (C), and transpiration rate (D) of ‘Huangkui’; Note: Different lowercase letters on the top of the bar chart indicate significant differences at the level of p < 0.05.
Plants 13 01782 g002
Plants 13 01782 g003
Figure 3. Effect of different photoperiod treatments on shoot growth in ‘Huangkui’. Effect of different photoperiod treatments on new leaf area (A), new shoot length (B), length of the internode (C), and the number of newly expanded leaves (D) of ‘Huangkui’. Note: Different lowercase letters on the top of the bar chart indicate significant differences at the level of p < 0.05.
Figure 3. Effect of different photoperiod treatments on shoot growth in ‘Huangkui’. Effect of different photoperiod treatments on new leaf area (A), new shoot length (B), length of the internode (C), and the number of newly expanded leaves (D) of ‘Huangkui’. Note: Different lowercase letters on the top of the bar chart indicate significant differences at the level of p < 0.05.
Plants 13 01782 g003
Plants 13 01782 g004
Figure 4. Spectral distribution of different light treatments. (A) Different light quality equipment, (B) Spectral composition in different light quality treatments.
Figure 4. Spectral distribution of different light treatments. (A) Different light quality equipment, (B) Spectral composition in different light quality treatments.
Plants 13 01782 g004
Plants 13 01782 g005
Figure 5. The effect of different light quality treatments on the growth of tea plants.
Figure 5. The effect of different light quality treatments on the growth of tea plants.
Plants 13 01782 g005
Plants 13 01782 g006
Figure 6. Effect of different light quality treatments on photosynthetic parameters of ‘Huangkui’. Effect of different light quality treatments on stomatal conductance (A), intercellular CO2 concentration (B), net photosynthetic rate (C), and transpiration rate (D) of ‘Huangkui’; Note: Different lowercase letters on the top of the bar chart indicate significant differences at the level of p < 0.05.
Figure 6. Effect of different light quality treatments on photosynthetic parameters of ‘Huangkui’. Effect of different light quality treatments on stomatal conductance (A), intercellular CO2 concentration (B), net photosynthetic rate (C), and transpiration rate (D) of ‘Huangkui’; Note: Different lowercase letters on the top of the bar chart indicate significant differences at the level of p < 0.05.
Plants 13 01782 g006
Plants 13 01782 g007
Figure 7. Effect of different light quality treatments on shoot growth in ‘Huangkui’. Effect of different light quality treatments on new leaf area (A), new shoot length (B), length of the internode (C), and the number of newly expanded leaves (D) of ‘Huangkui’. Note: Different lowercase letters on the top of the bar chart indicate significant differences at the level of p < 0.05.
Figure 7. Effect of different light quality treatments on shoot growth in ‘Huangkui’. Effect of different light quality treatments on new leaf area (A), new shoot length (B), length of the internode (C), and the number of newly expanded leaves (D) of ‘Huangkui’. Note: Different lowercase letters on the top of the bar chart indicate significant differences at the level of p < 0.05.
Plants 13 01782 g007
Plants 13 01782 g008
Figure 8. The effect of different light quality treatments on the quality in ‘Huangkui’. The effect of different light-quality treatments on polyphenol content (A), free amino acids (B), and caffeine content (C). Note: Different lowercase letters on the top of the bar chart indicate significant differences at the level of p < 0.05.
Figure 8. The effect of different light quality treatments on the quality in ‘Huangkui’. The effect of different light-quality treatments on polyphenol content (A), free amino acids (B), and caffeine content (C). Note: Different lowercase letters on the top of the bar chart indicate significant differences at the level of p < 0.05.
Plants 13 01782 g008
Plants 13 01782 g009
Figure 9. The hormone content of IAA (A) and tZ (B) and expression levels of CsIAA13 (C), CsGH3.1 (D), CsAUX1 (E), CsARF2 (F), CsARR-A (G) and CsARR-B (H) in ‘Huangkui’ leaves grown under R/B 1:1, R/B 2:1 and control treatment. Note: Different lowercase letters on the top of the bar chart indicate significant differences at the level of p < 0.05.
Figure 9. The hormone content of IAA (A) and tZ (B) and expression levels of CsIAA13 (C), CsGH3.1 (D), CsAUX1 (E), CsARF2 (F), CsARR-A (G) and CsARR-B (H) in ‘Huangkui’ leaves grown under R/B 1:1, R/B 2:1 and control treatment. Note: Different lowercase letters on the top of the bar chart indicate significant differences at the level of p < 0.05.
Plants 13 01782 g009
Table 1. The effect of different photoperiod treatments on the tea plant phenological periods.
Table 1. The effect of different photoperiod treatments on the tea plant phenological periods.
Photoperiod
Treatments		BuddingOne Bud and One LeafOne Bud and Two LeavesOne Bud and Three Leaves
DaysDaysDaysDays
12L/12D10 d16 d21 d27 d
14L/10D9 d14 d19 d25 d
16L/8D8 d12 d17 d24 d
18L/6D8 d13 d18 d25 d
Table 2. The effects of different photoperiod treatments on chlorophyll content in ‘HuangKui’. Means followed by different letters differ significantly by Duncan (p < 0.05).
Table 2. The effects of different photoperiod treatments on chlorophyll content in ‘HuangKui’. Means followed by different letters differ significantly by Duncan (p < 0.05).
Photoperiod
Treatments		Chlorophyll A
(mg/g FW)		Chlorophyll B
(mg/g FW)		Chlorophyll (A + B)
(mg/g FW)
12L/12D0.563 ± 0.011 b0.136 ± 0.020 b0.699 ± 0.013 d
14L/10D0.575 ± 0.004 b0.159 ± 0.009 ab0.734 ± 0.011 c
16L/8D0.649 ± 0.022 a0.189 ± 0.034 a0.838 ± 0.013 a
18L/6D0.642 ± 0.015 a0.142 ± 0.009 b0.784 ± 0.010 b
Table 3. The impact of different light quality treatments on the formation days of tea plant phenological periods.
Table 3. The impact of different light quality treatments on the formation days of tea plant phenological periods.
Light Quality
Treatments		BuddingOne Bud and One LeafOne Bud and Two LeavesOne Bud and Three Leaves
DaysDaysDaysDays
Control8 d12 d17 d24 d
R/B 1:110 d14 d17 d26 d
R/B 1:27 d12 d16 d22 d
R/B 1:36 d10 d15 d21 d
R/B 2:15 d9 d14 d18 d
Table 4. The effect of light quality treatments on the catechins acid in ‘HuangKui’. Means followed by different letters differ significantly by Duncan (p < 0.05).
Table 4. The effect of light quality treatments on the catechins acid in ‘HuangKui’. Means followed by different letters differ significantly by Duncan (p < 0.05).
Light Quality
Treatments		ControlR/B 1:1R/B 1:2R/B 1:3R/B 2:1
GC5.16 ± 0.21 a3.99 ± 0.40 b3.60 ± 0.43 b3.43 ± 0.78 b3.68 ± 0.48 b
EGC34.47 ± 0.42 ab33.22 ± 1.64 bc32.20 ± 0.23 c29.86 ± 0.39 d35.00 ± 0.31 a
C0.96 ± 0.02 c0.95 ± 0.00 c1.78 ± 0.06 b2.21 ± 0.04 a1.80 ± 0.01 b
EC13.85 ± 0.10 ab13.37 ± 0.54 b12.00 ± 0.13 c12.35 ± 0.36 c14.40 ± 0.30 a
EGCG66.18 ± 0.18 b57.83 ± 0.37 e64.73 ± 0.87 c62.86 ± 0.49 d69.65 ± 1.39 a
GCG1.45 ± 0.40 c2.38 ± 0.28 b2.47 ± 0.04 b3.06 ± 0.03 a2.98 ± 0.05 a
ECG8.56 ± 0.46 bc10.52 ± 0.36 a9.16 ± 0.10 b8.28 ± 0.29 c10.76 ± 0.55 a
TC130.64 ± 0.74 b122.27 ± 0.62 d125.92 ± 0.85 c122.06 ± 1.20 d138.26 ± 2.15 a
Note: GC, (−)-gallocatechin; EGC, (−)-epigallocatechin; C, (+)-catechin; EC (+)-epicatechin; EGCG, (−)-epigallocatechin gallate; GCG, (−)-gallocatechin gallate; ECG, (−)-epicatechin gallate; TC, total catechins.
Table 5. The ratio of the emission spectral distribution of the LED light sources.
Table 5. The ratio of the emission spectral distribution of the LED light sources.
Light Quality TreatmentsControlR/B 1:1R/B 1:2R/B 1:3R/B 2:1
Number of R/B LED Tube Assemblies/4/23/33/23/2
Half-width HW/nm170.622.522.522.724.6
Irradiance Ee (W/m2)53.3142.033.836.134.4
Light intensity range
μmol−1 m−2 s−1		201~223192~229204~247193~233207~238
Red light band share (R)LED plant full spectrum light50%33%25%66%
Lue light band share (B)LED plant full spectrum light50%66%75%33%
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Hu, G.; Li, X.; Yang, J.; Yuan, Q.; Yang, S.; Fu, W.; Zhang, X.; Li, Y.; Shen, Z.; Jiang, J. Effects of Photoperiod and Light Quality on Germination and Growth of Camellia sinensis ‘HuangKui’. Plants 2024, 13, 1782. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants13131782

AMA Style

Hu G, Li X, Yang J, Yuan Q, Yang S, Fu W, Zhang X, Li Y, Shen Z, Jiang J. Effects of Photoperiod and Light Quality on Germination and Growth of Camellia sinensis ‘HuangKui’. Plants. 2024; 13(13):1782. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants13131782

Chicago/Turabian Style

Hu, Gan, Xingchen Li, Junlong Yang, Qingqing Yuan, Shijun Yang, Wenjun Fu, Xianchen Zhang, Yeyun Li, Zhougao Shen, and Jiayue Jiang. 2024. "Effects of Photoperiod and Light Quality on Germination and Growth of Camellia sinensis ‘HuangKui’" Plants 13, no. 13: 1782. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants13131782

APA Style

Hu, G., Li, X., Yang, J., Yuan, Q., Yang, S., Fu, W., Zhang, X., Li, Y., Shen, Z., & Jiang, J. (2024). Effects of Photoperiod and Light Quality on Germination and Growth of Camellia sinensis ‘HuangKui’. Plants, 13(13), 1782. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants13131782

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop